正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

As Jeremy said, this sequence from 2G Blaz is so sick! 1. Backdash = perfect whiff punish spacing 2. Combo ender w tatsu (many players would’ve spent 1 super to close the round) 3. Tatsu ender setup for auto timed meaty fireball full screen = no risk for the win

Sherry Nhan

37,642 subscribers

87,856 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术游戏艺术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Pressure sequences that build a Drive Gauge lead 👇 0:00 Once you’ve conditioned the opponent to stop mashing, and they mostly rely on throw techs or fuzzy mash attempts, you can start using “scam” pressure sequences. 👉 > > st.HP xx fireball 👉 > > target combo xx fireball 👉 Drive Rush > walk > > st.HP xx fireball, etc. 0:15 Catching fireball retaliation attempts 👉 st.HP > delayed to catch fireball counter-pokes 👉 If they stop challenging, go for greedy pressure like st.HP > 6MK 0:39 Tip-range 214LP pressure After heavy tatsu, punish counter throw, heavy DP, etc. 👉 tip-range st.HP xx 214LP ※ Only works on Mai, AKI, Sagat, Zangief, and Dhalsim 1:09 214MP is only safe on block against Lily even when it hits deep 1:18 Heavy tatsu > cr.LP, st.LP frame kill > meaty cr.HP > OD fireball leaves you at +2 in throw range 1:34 Using OD fireball after shimmy confirms like cr.LP / 👉 catches retaliation attempts while continuing pressure 1:59 Chip setups from safe jumps after SA2, etc. 👉 A full sequence can create around a 5-bar Drive Gauge lead 👉 If they try anti-air perfect parry to avoid chip, you can punish with empty jump throw 2:16 Chip pressure after medium tatsu or light DP anti-air 👉 Kara jump lets you block reversals like DP 2:27 Charged fireball pressure after st.HP, etc. If the opponent starts parrying after seeing st.HP cancels or fireballs, 👉 walk > target combo xx fireball to continue pressure This alone can create around a 3.5-bar Drive Gauge lead 👉 st.HP charged fireball > walk throw 👉 tip-range st.HP charged fireball > dash throw 👉 Drive Rush overhead are also strong options

Pressure sequences that build a Drive Gauge lead 👇 0:00 Once you’ve conditioned the opponent to stop mashing, and they mostly rely on throw techs or fuzzy mash attempts, you can start using “scam” pressure sequences. 👉 > > st.HP xx fireball 👉 > > target combo xx fireball 👉 Drive Rush > walk > > st.HP xx fireball, etc. 0:15 Catching fireball retaliation attempts 👉 st.HP > delayed to catch fireball counter-pokes 👉 If they stop challenging, go for greedy pressure like st.HP > 6MK 0:39 Tip-range 214LP pressure After heavy tatsu, punish counter throw, heavy DP, etc. 👉 tip-range st.HP xx 214LP ※ Only works on Mai, AKI, Sagat, Zangief, and Dhalsim 1:09 214MP is only safe on block against Lily even when it hits deep 1:18 Heavy tatsu > cr.LP, st.LP frame kill > meaty cr.HP > OD fireball leaves you at +2 in throw range 1:34 Using OD fireball after shimmy confirms like cr.LP / 👉 catches retaliation attempts while continuing pressure 1:59 Chip setups from safe jumps after SA2, etc. 👉 A full sequence can create around a 5-bar Drive Gauge lead 👉 If they try anti-air perfect parry to avoid chip, you can punish with empty jump throw 2:16 Chip pressure after medium tatsu or light DP anti-air 👉 Kara jump lets you block reversals like DP 2:27 Charged fireball pressure after st.HP, etc. If the opponent starts parrying after seeing st.HP cancels or fireballs, 👉 walk > target combo xx fireball to continue pressure This alone can create around a 3.5-bar Drive Gauge lead 👉 st.HP charged fireball > walk throw 👉 tip-range st.HP charged fireball > dash throw 👉 Drive Rush overhead are also strong options

白(ワラキア)

17,000 次观看 • 2 个月前

Set up for Illaoi's super slow but strong back+S1 (charged). This is reversal safe, hits meaty, and is massively plus on block. - You need 2 tentacles out, 1 to HKD and 1 to back+S1 - The jump loop adds damage lost from saving tentacles - backdash before back+S1 #2XKO_ILLAOI

Set up for Illaoi's super slow but strong back+S1 (charged). This is reversal safe, hits meaty, and is massively plus on block. - You need 2 tentacles out, 1 to HKD and 1 to back+S1 - The jump loop adds damage lost from saving tentacles - backdash before back+S1 #2XKO_ILLAOI

【Bernard】

11,057 次观看 • 2 年前

My current thoughts on dealing with Ingrid’s setups, teleports, and beams 👇 Still feels pretty underdeveloped, but here’s what I’ve got so far. 0:00- As a counter to OD parry, meaty OD Hadoken or charged fireball. Even if the parry succeeds, you’re still around +6, so you can punish with 0:12- Safe jumps after MK Tatsu or LP DP. Anti-air invincible reversals can still be blocked, and OD parry can also be covered. 0:28- Counterplay against setup into teleport. If you block from farther away, it tends to become a true blockstring. If you move in and crouch block, it becomes easier to DP or Perfect Parry the teleport. 0:42- If dealing with it from farther out, Perfect Parry first, then if you see the teleport, anti-air with cr.HP or similar. 0:44- Against setup > stock charge or teleport, buffer Perfect Parry Drive Rush beforehand. Go under the teleport with whiff cr.LP > turn-around cr.LP. If you see the charge instead, check with or similar. 0:56- If you recognize either the horizontal or overhead teleport, anti-air with cr.HP or st.LP > st.LP. 1:15- Use Hyakki preemptively against the setup, then go into the HK follow-up if you see teleport or charge. 1:28- Walk forward and parry as a read against mid setup. If you get a close-range Perfect Parry against the mid setup, sweep can punish. 1:33- If they start mixing in heavy setup, use Parry Drive Rush into cr.LP. 1:40- If they use setup at close range, it’s at least possible to react and aim for a sweep trade. 1:46- Against non-enhanced beam, Perfect Parry > 6HP will reach unless it hits at max range. You can also whiff punish missed beams with Drive Rush and similar options.

My current thoughts on dealing with Ingrid’s setups, teleports, and beams 👇 Still feels pretty underdeveloped, but here’s what I’ve got so far. 0:00- As a counter to OD parry, meaty OD Hadoken or charged fireball. Even if the parry succeeds, you’re still around +6, so you can punish with 0:12- Safe jumps after MK Tatsu or LP DP. Anti-air invincible reversals can still be blocked, and OD parry can also be covered. 0:28- Counterplay against setup into teleport. If you block from farther away, it tends to become a true blockstring. If you move in and crouch block, it becomes easier to DP or Perfect Parry the teleport. 0:42- If dealing with it from farther out, Perfect Parry first, then if you see the teleport, anti-air with cr.HP or similar. 0:44- Against setup > stock charge or teleport, buffer Perfect Parry Drive Rush beforehand. Go under the teleport with whiff cr.LP > turn-around cr.LP. If you see the charge instead, check with or similar. 0:56- If you recognize either the horizontal or overhead teleport, anti-air with cr.HP or st.LP > st.LP. 1:15- Use Hyakki preemptively against the setup, then go into the HK follow-up if you see teleport or charge. 1:28- Walk forward and parry as a read against mid setup. If you get a close-range Perfect Parry against the mid setup, sweep can punish. 1:33- If they start mixing in heavy setup, use Parry Drive Rush into cr.LP. 1:40- If they use setup at close range, it’s at least possible to react and aim for a sweep trade. 1:46- Against non-enhanced beam, Perfect Parry > 6HP will reach unless it hits at max range. You can also whiff punish missed beams with Drive Rush and similar options.

白(ワラキア)

31,577 次观看 • 2 个月前

Kwame Brown DESTROYS Tracy Mcgrady for Doubling Down and Saying he could win a Championship with Shaq 🔥🔥 "Kobe Bryant is an interview saying he whooped you 11-3 in 1 on 1 games, Kobe said he made you quit. The guy you guys claim is so close to Kobe Bryant 1 on 1 allegedly lost 11-3, Tmac ain't never get out the 1st round of the playoffs but wants to talk like he was so close. Stats is starting to drive these people crazy they're forgetting dog, they forgetting heart, they forgetting will to win, they forgetting somebody that will do anything to win, they forgetting somebody being coachable enough to win, you had the keys to every team you've been on, so just didnt get it done"

Kwame Brown DESTROYS Tracy Mcgrady for Doubling Down and Saying he could win a Championship with Shaq 🔥🔥 "Kobe Bryant is an interview saying he whooped you 11-3 in 1 on 1 games, Kobe said he made you quit. The guy you guys claim is so close to Kobe Bryant 1 on 1 allegedly lost 11-3, Tmac ain't never get out the 1st round of the playoffs but wants to talk like he was so close. Stats is starting to drive these people crazy they're forgetting dog, they forgetting heart, they forgetting will to win, they forgetting somebody that will do anything to win, they forgetting somebody being coachable enough to win, you had the keys to every team you've been on, so just didnt get it done"

TheTruth

601,473 次观看 • 10 个月前

🪄Release Celebration🪄 New Agent Preview | #Nora "My Scissors Life Story Is Wrong, As Expected." Watch the trailer to find out why Nora said this, and join the celebration for a chance to win rewards! 🔥 🎯To enter: 1.Follow Strinova 2.Repost and like this post 🎁Prizes: Michele 2-in-1 Pillow Blanket ×1 (3 winners) Advanced Warrant ×1 for the New Season (5 winners) ---------- YouTube: Play #Strinova Now! ▷ Epic: ▷ Steam: ▷ Official Website:

🪄Release Celebration🪄 New Agent Preview | #Nora "My Scissors Life Story Is Wrong, As Expected." Watch the trailer to find out why Nora said this, and join the celebration for a chance to win rewards! 🔥 🎯To enter: 1.Follow Strinova 2.Repost and like this post 🎁Prizes: Michele 2-in-1 Pillow Blanket ×1 (3 winners) Advanced Warrant ×1 for the New Season (5 winners) ---------- YouTube: Play #Strinova Now! ▷ Epic: ▷ Steam: ▷ Official Website:

Strinova

28,306 次观看 • 17 天前

120 AI models. FREE for a year. no credit card. Hermes Studio already has NVIDIA preset as the base_url - so all you need is a FREE API key and you're running 120+ models instantly here's the setup: 1/ go to 2/ register, log in, bind your phone number 3/ grab your API key 4/ drop it into Hermes Studio what you get: 1/ 120+ models 2/ 40 requests per minute 3/ free for a full year while everyone's paying for API access, this is sitting right there for free

120 AI models. FREE for a year. no credit card. Hermes Studio already has NVIDIA preset as the base_url - so all you need is a FREE API key and you're running 120+ models instantly here's the setup: 1/ go to 2/ register, log in, bind your phone number 3/ grab your API key 4/ drop it into Hermes Studio what you get: 1/ 120+ models 2/ 40 requests per minute 3/ free for a full year while everyone's paying for API access, this is sitting right there for free

kaize

137,488 次观看 • 1 个月前

Alex’s standing medium punch is absurd. It’s huge, +0 on block, & most importantly: you can hit confirm it into his target combo (which leads to +5 Okie): - you can meaty throw or jab. - If you Jab it’s +2 on block so tick throwing after the jab beats 4f jabs - jab into lariat here is a true block string (usually 1 frame gap). The Lariat is +3 & puts you in the perfect range for Strike / Command Grab mix up -canceling the initial dash into hop makes DP and Drive Reversal whiff. Jabs also whiff. Also puts the opponent in a very awkward position #SF6 #SF6_ALEX #StreetFighter6 #スト6

Alex’s standing medium punch is absurd. It’s huge, +0 on block, & most importantly: you can hit confirm it into his target combo (which leads to +5 Okie): - you can meaty throw or jab. - If you Jab it’s +2 on block so tick throwing after the jab beats 4f jabs - jab into lariat here is a true block string (usually 1 frame gap). The Lariat is +3 & puts you in the perfect range for Strike / Command Grab mix up -canceling the initial dash into hop makes DP and Drive Reversal whiff. Jabs also whiff. Also puts the opponent in a very awkward position #SF6 #SF6_ALEX #StreetFighter6 #スト6

GimR (Go watch SASSY!)

77,826 次观看 • 4 个月前

What Makes an A+++ Setup (According to a $291K Trader) A setup is the specific market condition where all your criteria align for a high-probability trade entry. Most traders don't understand the criteria that makes a solid entry. They take every setup that looks "good enough" — and end up with 1:2 or 1:3 risk-to-reward ratios, grinding for small wins. Here's the difference: An A+++ setup allowed my student Said to make $86,000 in one day from just 3 trades (with 1:18, 1:7, and 1:10 R/R). And $291k over the last 1.5 years. If there’s a mediocre setup, he won’t take it. Some weeks he only trades twice because he's waiting for perfection. In the 2-minute clip below, my student Said walks through the 5 elements that must align for an A+++ setup: 1) Inverse Fair Value Gap — An imbalance price needs to fill 2) Inducement — Liquidity sweep that triggers early traders 3) Imbalance — Gap in price delivery that draws price back 4) Protected Level — Previous inducement + break of structure creates an internal floor/ceiling 5) Break of Structure — Confirmation that one side is in control Said also looks for setups where you have TWO protected levels, not just one. This gives him the confidence to enter at the end of the fair value gap without waiting for additional confirmation. Stop loss goes just below the protected level — tight risk, massive reward potential. — This is just scratching the surface of what Said shared. In the full 1-hour interview, we also dove into: • The exact 3 trades that made him $86K in a single day (with timestamped chart breakdowns) • How he combined two different strategies into one profitable system • Why he still backtests 1-1.5 hours daily even after making $100K/month Just comment "INTERVIEW" and I'll DM you the full interview in the next few minutes.

What Makes an A+++ Setup (According to a $291K Trader) A setup is the specific market condition where all your criteria align for a high-probability trade entry. Most traders don't understand the criteria that makes a solid entry. They take every setup that looks "good enough" — and end up with 1:2 or 1:3 risk-to-reward ratios, grinding for small wins. Here's the difference: An A+++ setup allowed my student Said to make $86,000 in one day from just 3 trades (with 1:18, 1:7, and 1:10 R/R). And $291k over the last 1.5 years. If there’s a mediocre setup, he won’t take it. Some weeks he only trades twice because he's waiting for perfection. In the 2-minute clip below, my student Said walks through the 5 elements that must align for an A+++ setup: 1) Inverse Fair Value Gap — An imbalance price needs to fill 2) Inducement — Liquidity sweep that triggers early traders 3) Imbalance — Gap in price delivery that draws price back 4) Protected Level — Previous inducement + break of structure creates an internal floor/ceiling 5) Break of Structure — Confirmation that one side is in control Said also looks for setups where you have TWO protected levels, not just one. This gives him the confidence to enter at the end of the fair value gap without waiting for additional confirmation. Stop loss goes just below the protected level — tight risk, massive reward potential. — This is just scratching the surface of what Said shared. In the full 1-hour interview, we also dove into: • The exact 3 trades that made him $86K in a single day (with timestamped chart breakdowns) • How he combined two different strategies into one profitable system • Why he still backtests 1-1.5 hours daily even after making $100K/month Just comment "INTERVIEW" and I'll DM you the full interview in the next few minutes.

The Trading Geek (Brad Goh)

15,338 次观看 • 6 个月前

why this wall by BBL Loita 🇹🇷 is so good 1. Hold the site as normal like a regular smoke 2. Hide in the cubby at the start of the round, they can't enter from Cave 3. Set up a crossfire in Cave Nothing revolutionary but good to know for a beginner Viper

why this wall by BBL Loita 🇹🇷 is so good 1. Hold the site as normal like a regular smoke 2. Hide in the cubby at the start of the round, they can't enter from Cave 3. Set up a crossfire in Cave Nothing revolutionary but good to know for a beginner Viper

ROCKET

215,344 次观看 • 4 个月前

auto-research is starting to gain traction as a very viable paradigm for creating useful research discovery. now, that paradigm is still in its infancy and the infrastructure to hold all that trail of context as the agents blaze through experiments isn't well defined (to say the least). on that topic, I had the chance to chat with my boys francesco and giulio from paradigma about what underlying infra is needed to make this paradigm work. the paradigma's paradigm, which involves copious amount of DAGs, make this auto-research paradigm a paradigmatic case of essential infrastructure. here's the full video in full: - 0:00 - what is missing from auto-research? - 2:02 - giulio and francesco ai journey - 8:10 - research infra is the bottleneck? - 10:18 - paradigma vision of autonomous research - 13:17 - “important discovery per joules” - 17:15 - why is DAG the unit of research for auto-research? - 20:40 - is paradigma trying to replace the research publication? - 24:50 - how does knowledge is shared between experiments in the DAG? - 27:34 - what is even auto-research lol? - 33:53 - the value of the human mind in this auto-research future. - 37:00 - how do you reconcile hallucination in this auto-research paradigm? - 41:33 - the adoption of auto-research across varied fields? - 47:30 - ✨ introduction to the auto-research infrastructure. ✨ - 56:55 - where is the code? - 59:10 - full IDE next? - 1:03:20 - the place of the human in this DAG / code quality? manual node? token spent? - 1:16:02 - who’s the user for auto-research? - 1:18:13 - how to validate bad DAG? - 1:20:18 - ✨ auto-research agent results ✨ - 1:22:53 - ✨ how a big research DAG looks like? ✨ - 1:25:10 - how to get the canonical DAG for the final result? - 1:27:50 - the auto-research DAG being the new pre-print? - 1:30:05 - what’s next for paradigma and the auto-research infra? - 1:35:00 - what are they excited about research wise? enjoyyyyy my guys 🌹

auto-research is starting to gain traction as a very viable paradigm for creating useful research discovery. now, that paradigm is still in its infancy and the infrastructure to hold all that trail of context as the agents blaze through experiments isn't well defined (to say the least). on that topic, I had the chance to chat with my boys francesco and giulio from paradigma about what underlying infra is needed to make this paradigm work. the paradigma's paradigm, which involves copious amount of DAGs, make this auto-research paradigm a paradigmatic case of essential infrastructure. here's the full video in full: - 0:00 - what is missing from auto-research? - 2:02 - giulio and francesco ai journey - 8:10 - research infra is the bottleneck? - 10:18 - paradigma vision of autonomous research - 13:17 - “important discovery per joules” - 17:15 - why is DAG the unit of research for auto-research? - 20:40 - is paradigma trying to replace the research publication? - 24:50 - how does knowledge is shared between experiments in the DAG? - 27:34 - what is even auto-research lol? - 33:53 - the value of the human mind in this auto-research future. - 37:00 - how do you reconcile hallucination in this auto-research paradigm? - 41:33 - the adoption of auto-research across varied fields? - 47:30 - ✨ introduction to the auto-research infrastructure. ✨ - 56:55 - where is the code? - 59:10 - full IDE next? - 1:03:20 - the place of the human in this DAG / code quality? manual node? token spent? - 1:16:02 - who’s the user for auto-research? - 1:18:13 - how to validate bad DAG? - 1:20:18 - ✨ auto-research agent results ✨ - 1:22:53 - ✨ how a big research DAG looks like? ✨ - 1:25:10 - how to get the canonical DAG for the final result? - 1:27:50 - the auto-research DAG being the new pre-print? - 1:30:05 - what’s next for paradigma and the auto-research infra? - 1:35:00 - what are they excited about research wise? enjoyyyyy my guys 🌹

Yacine Mahdid

12,091 次观看 • 2 个月前

This is wayyy too fun. I've been trying to achieve this effect for years My Setup: 1. OBS 2. Making 70% of my room into green screen (Thank you SomaticVR) 3. Align my real life Camera with #VRChat Camera and mask out the avatar 4. VR and FBT (8 Orion Trackers from SomaticVR)

SoundsLikeRonen

78,482 次观看 • 3 个月前

i spent 4 dollars to make this post Akali 3H single routing structure with positioning optimizations these range from bnb territory to psychotic, but mainly putting together as an example for combo limits / optimization adjustments on the fly. You can always 2 hit walljump / do single hit jM to reduce some length and maintain the routing if combo time is a concern. For the third and fourth combos, there are 2 versions - one that optimizes for limit strike damage / combo time, and one that sends in extra air normals for 5s2 oki. Just posted both as an example, but routing like this also helps bridge the gap on 5s2 damage if you'd like to use that. Notes: 1) Corner to corner, keep in mind extra normals will increase the pushback and leave you closer to corner by the end, reducing frame adv from the tumble. 2) Nearing corner (starting about 75% of the stage away) adjustment on the ender for when the tumble has less frame adv, just cram in more air normals and save your double jump. 3) Here's where you'll start to see corner adjustments - round start position, this ends up being the starter for max damage midscreen, but if you were to reach the corner after the apex of your second jump loop arc, you can squeeze in extra minimum damage for a notable increase. Fortunately also maximizes corner carry while pushing damage. 4) In corner route. Stupid hard wrt combo time, just posting as an example of combo limits. you can probably just opt for above, but it does get an extra min damage source in. Alternatively, learn an easier combo lol. Have similarly structured stuff for 2H, will probably get to it later.

i spent 4 dollars to make this post Akali 3H single routing structure with positioning optimizations these range from bnb territory to psychotic, but mainly putting together as an example for combo limits / optimization adjustments on the fly. You can always 2 hit walljump / do single hit jM to reduce some length and maintain the routing if combo time is a concern. For the third and fourth combos, there are 2 versions - one that optimizes for limit strike damage / combo time, and one that sends in extra air normals for 5s2 oki. Just posted both as an example, but routing like this also helps bridge the gap on 5s2 damage if you'd like to use that. Notes: 1) Corner to corner, keep in mind extra normals will increase the pushback and leave you closer to corner by the end, reducing frame adv from the tumble. 2) Nearing corner (starting about 75% of the stage away) adjustment on the ender for when the tumble has less frame adv, just cram in more air normals and save your double jump. 3) Here's where you'll start to see corner adjustments - round start position, this ends up being the starter for max damage midscreen, but if you were to reach the corner after the apex of your second jump loop arc, you can squeeze in extra minimum damage for a notable increase. Fortunately also maximizes corner carry while pushing damage. 4) In corner route. Stupid hard wrt combo time, just posting as an example of combo limits. you can probably just opt for above, but it does get an extra min damage source in. Alternatively, learn an easier combo lol. Have similarly structured stuff for 2H, will probably get to it later.

SKD

20,215 次观看 • 3 个月前

zerobaseone's dorm setup is divided into 4! dorm 1: jiwoong with another manager dorm 2: taerae, gunwook, yujin with a manager dorm 3: matthew and ricky with a manager dorm 4: hanbin, hao, gyuvin one of the managers said the setup was decided through the ladder game, and one person gets to live alone with a manager, which is jiwoong as for dorm 4, hanbin does a great job leading everyone so no need to have a manager in the dorm

zerobaseone's dorm setup is divided into 4! dorm 1: jiwoong with another manager dorm 2: taerae, gunwook, yujin with a manager dorm 3: matthew and ricky with a manager dorm 4: hanbin, hao, gyuvin one of the managers said the setup was decided through the ladder game, and one person gets to live alone with a manager, which is jiwoong as for dorm 4, hanbin does a great job leading everyone so no need to have a manager in the dorm

🎸

2,360,008 次观看 • 1 年前

Is this a style points game for the Eagles' offense on Sunday? Ike says a win in Dallas is all that matters: "We gotta knock down this No. 1 seed so that we're hosting the NFC Championship game, which gives us a better chance to be in the Super Bowl. I'll accept gradual improvement each week as long as they're getting wins."

Is this a style points game for the Eagles' offense on Sunday? Ike says a win in Dallas is all that matters: "We gotta knock down this No. 1 seed so that we're hosting the NFC Championship game, which gives us a better chance to be in the Super Bowl. I'll accept gradual improvement each week as long as they're getting wins."

SPORTSRADIO 94WIP

32,218 次观看 • 8 个月前

war comes with death and death is always tragic but the “Free Palestine movement” is being used as a tool to … 1. Justify mass migration 2. Win political support from the growing Muslim majority 3. Allow lefties to pretend to be morally superior … all whilst not doing a single thing to help the Palestinians in Gaza. It is sick to see people use a tragedy for their own personal gain. 💔 Full episode on Dan Wootton

war comes with death and death is always tragic but the “Free Palestine movement” is being used as a tool to … 1. Justify mass migration 2. Win political support from the growing Muslim majority 3. Allow lefties to pretend to be morally superior … all whilst not doing a single thing to help the Palestinians in Gaza. It is sick to see people use a tragedy for their own personal gain. 💔 Full episode on Dan Wootton

BASEDANDBOUGIE

15,178 次观看 • 7 个月前

💥No one rivals Doom! As the Timestream Entanglement engulfs the Multiverse, heroes from across time unleash their full strength to combat the most dangerous Super Villains they've ever encountered. Follow Marvel Rivals and reshare this post for a chance to win a CBT access key! Prize: 50 qualifications for the Closed Beta Test Duration: 1. Event ends on July 27th. 2. Winners will be announced on July 28th. #MarvelRivals #MarvelGames #Marvel #Doom #SDCC2024

💥No one rivals Doom! As the Timestream Entanglement engulfs the Multiverse, heroes from across time unleash their full strength to combat the most dangerous Super Villains they've ever encountered. Follow Marvel Rivals and reshare this post for a chance to win a CBT access key! Prize: 50 qualifications for the Closed Beta Test Duration: 1. Event ends on July 27th. 2. Winners will be announced on July 28th. #MarvelRivals #MarvelGames #Marvel #Doom #SDCC2024

Marvel Rivals

1,600,137 次观看 • 2 年前

Reasons to build a home gym: 1) As many dogs as I want. 2) Nobody stares for drinking a gallon of raw milk. 3) Nobody broccoli heads. 4) My playlist is the only playlist. 5) No waiting for machines. Bulking season starting early this year. Sitting at 250 and fully sending it to 270.

Reasons to build a home gym: 1) As many dogs as I want. 2) Nobody stares for drinking a gallon of raw milk. 3) Nobody broccoli heads. 4) My playlist is the only playlist. 5) No waiting for machines. Bulking season starting early this year. Sitting at 250 and fully sending it to 270.

Ian Smith, Sr.

23,107 次观看 • 1 年前

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount of money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved ____ milestones and eliminated ____ risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve ____ milestones and eliminate ____ risks. This will get the company to ____ state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land. Follow Startup Archive for more tactical startup advice!

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount of money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved milestones and eliminated risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve milestones and eliminate risks. This will get the company to state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land. Follow Startup Archive for more tactical startup advice!

Startup Archive

178,597 次观看 • 2 年前

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved ____ milestones and eliminated ____ risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve ____ milestones and eliminate ____ risks. This will get the company to ____ state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land.

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved milestones and eliminated risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve milestones and eliminate risks. This will get the company to state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land.

Michael McGuiness

735,645 次观看 • 3 年前