Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

As Starmer commits another foreign policy u-turn, we mustn’t overlook an extraordinary fact - if these reports are right & missiles were fired at Diego Garcia, with one intercepted by a US destroyer, this once again shows Labour operating extraordinary double standards 👇

63,448 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Steve Reed is lying his way through another media round. “We have systems and defences in place that keep the United Kingdom safe” HMS Duncan is the only asset we currently have capable of intercepting a ballistic missile. It’s already committed to deploying with the HMS Prince of Wales Carrier Strike Group on Operation Firecrest. We currently don’t have enough seaworthy Type 45s to fulfil our existing commitments, which includes the flagship role for the Standing NATO Maritime Group One, let alone defence of the UK mainland against hypothetical ballistic missile attack. “We will take necessary defensive action to protect British interests, British people or our allies across the region” No, we haven’t. We deployed HMS Dragon which has only just arrived in the Eastern Mediterranean. We haven’t intercepted a single missile and have intercepted a handful of the thousands of drone fired. Bahrain is one of our closest allies in the region. It has been repeatedly struck by missiles and drones for three weeks. There is no account of us having played any role in intercepting any of them, despite the C-SIPA agreement between us and the presence of the UK Naval Support Facility. “The UK has been taking down drones and missiles that have been fired around” We haven’t intercepted any missiles. The only capability that could is HMS Dragon, and that has been in transit. “Our assessment is that there was a missile launched at Diego Garcia, two I think….one failed and the other was intercepted, so that shows that our defensive capabilities are correct” An Iranian IRBM failing doesn’t show our defensive capabilities are correct; we got lucky. The other was intercepted, by a US-Navy SM-3 ballistic missile interceptor. Reed implies that this was by UK forces. Once again we were reliant upon the US. We appear entirely unwilling to hold Iran to account for attacking us. The Government is fudging its way through this conflict one indecisive step at a time, but gaslighting us into believing they’re in control of the situation is laughable.

Ben Obese-Jecty MP

61,575 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 EXPOSED: NATO Secretary General Admits They CAN'T Confirm Israel Claim ThatIran FIRED An ICBM At Diego Garcia.🧐 This morning’s Face the Nation interview with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte was a masterclass in "Manufactured Consent." While the Israeli government is screaming from the rooftops that Iran just fired ICBMs at Diego Garcia, the actual head of NATO just admitted they cannot confirm those reports. Bibi Netanyahu and the IDF are claiming that Iran fired two Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) at the joint US-UK base on Diego Garcia—missiles they say can now hit Paris, Berlin, and Rome. In a direct question from Margaret Brennan, NATO’s Mark Rutte had to admit: "We cannot confirm that at the moment." Think about that. The most powerful military alliance in the world—with the best satellite tracking on the planet—cannot verify the very "threat" being used to justify an all-out war. THE PROPAGANDA LOOP: The Narrative: Israel says Iran has 4,000km range missiles to scare Europe into the conflict. The Reality: If NATO can't confirm Israel's story, is it true? NO. This a False Flag or a "ghost launch" designed to drag the UK and Europe into a war they already said they wanted no part of? The "North Korea" Playbook: Rutte is already pivoting to the "pre-emptive" strike argument, saying we can't wait like we did with North Korea. They are using unconfirmed reports to justify confirmed escalations. THE BOTTOM LINE: As I’ve been saying, the "Epstein Class" and the Neocons are desperate for a regional bloodbath to secure their global banking interests. They want you to believe your own family in Europe is under direct threat so you won't question the billions being poured into this illegal war. If the Secretary General of NATO can't confirm the missiles, why is the media reporting them as a "done deal"? Because the truth is the first casualty of war. 🇺🇸⚓️ From: Drop Site FOLLOW Them!

Project Constitution

26,960 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

.David Sacks explains how his distrust of the U.S. foreign policy establishment grew from the numerous lies, $8 trillion spent, and millions killed in Middle Eastern wars over the last two decades: "They lied us into the Iraq War. The war did nothing to improve American security. We destabilized the Middle East. We turned Iraq into an Iranian proxy state. The destabilization created a huge refugee problem that spilled over into Syria, which is another intervention that we bungled. We got in Afghanistan initially motivated by the fact that they supported Al Qaeda, which attacked us on 9/11, but then we stayed there in an open-ended occupation for 20 years, and the entire time we were told that we were winning and the country was being transformed into a democracy and everything turned out to be a lie. All of these foreign interventions in the middle east cost us $8 trillion, and the number of deaths is staggering. Almost a million direct deaths from all the wars we launched, and I've seen excess mortality numbers as high as 5 million. We unleashed staggering death and destruction. So, I don't know how you can live through the past twenty years without rethinking American foreign policy. Not recognizing that American foreign policy has been overly activist and overly interventionist. It's totally backfired on us and blown up in our faces. The sad thing is the same people that got us involved in that foreign policy are still there. It's the foreign policy establishment. There's been very little accountability for all of those people. In fact, most of them have moved to the Democratic party. They are really comfortable with the idea of state power."

KanekoaTheGreat

602,024 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren