Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

As the Herby-Jonung-Hanke book "Did Lockdowns Work?" found: Lockdowns had a tiny effect on mortality, almost no health benefits, but imposed massive economic costs. Lockdowns were the worst policy blunder since World War II. My latest interview with James Connor:

Steve Hanke

852,177 subscribers

15,778 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

5 Kommentare

Profilbild von James Connor

James Connorvor 1 Jahr

Lockdowns were disastrous not only from an economic point a view but also from a psychological point of view but of course the powers that be never want to address this. In addition, lockdowns and free handouts created a generation of lazy people.

Profilbild von

vor 1 Jahr

@JamesConnor1999 never again….

Profilbild von Freedom Fighter

Freedom Fightervor 1 Jahr

@JamesConnor1999 Thanks, Prof! You are worth your weight in gold dross! 😂

Profilbild von Lost in a Lost World

Lost in a Lost Worldvor 1 Jahr

@HNIJohnMiller @JamesConnor1999 I don't know about anybody else but I had just lost everything I own in Hurricane Irma 3 years prior to the lockdown. It took me 3 years to cobble my life back together and covid finished me off. So it was a financial Devastation for me personally. I kind of gave up.

Profilbild von Roger Horton

Roger Hortonvor 1 Jahr

@JamesConnor1999 Well said SH. I live in Victoria Australia which suffered the worst / longest shutdowns imposed anywhere by the labour Gov’t led by Dan Andrews. We are consequently severely indebted and suffer years of future draconian taxes levies etc due to their chronic mismanagement.

Ähnliche Videos

Yours truly on the health effect of lockdowns: In terms of reducing mortality rates, lockdowns had virtually no effect. Read more in "Did Lockdowns Work?" by Herby, Jonung, and Hanke.

Yours truly on the health effect of lockdowns: In terms of reducing mortality rates, lockdowns had virtually no effect. Read more in "Did Lockdowns Work?" by Herby, Jonung, and Hanke.

Steve Hanke

13,084 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"Lockdowns were a devastating policy.. Sweden.. and Florida are examples that we didn't need to lockdown.. they had lower all-cause excess mortality.. Lockdowns did not save lives but had tremendous consequences on the poor, working class, children & vulnerable" —Jay Bhattacharya

"Lockdowns were a devastating policy.. Sweden.. and Florida are examples that we didn't need to lockdown.. they had lower all-cause excess mortality.. Lockdowns did not save lives but had tremendous consequences on the poor, working class, children & vulnerable" —Jay Bhattacharya

Kulvinder Kaur MD

116,903 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Andrew Bridgen (Andrew Bridgen) was one of the only members of the UK Parliament who spoke out during COVID. I wanted to know what he was actually up against when he did. During the lockdowns, he was watching more people commit suicide in a month than he would normally see in a year. He went to his government. He said you're killing my people. They told him there was no link between suicides and lockdowns. A million people under 25 in the UK came out of those lockdowns on waiting lists for mental health support. But there's no link... He told me himself - they were just lying. At the same time, his government was being pressured to authorize experimental vaccines for children as young as six months old. No healthy child that age had died anywhere in the world. They were at no risk. And Andrew stood up in the House of Commons and said what I've believed for a long time: any society willing to sacrifice its children to protect adults has lost its way. Just like he said, I expect to make sacrifices for my children. I don't expect them to make sacrifices for me.

Andrew Bridgen (Andrew Bridgen) was one of the only members of the UK Parliament who spoke out during COVID. I wanted to know what he was actually up against when he did. During the lockdowns, he was watching more people commit suicide in a month than he would normally see in a year. He went to his government. He said you're killing my people. They told him there was no link between suicides and lockdowns. A million people under 25 in the UK came out of those lockdowns on waiting lists for mental health support. But there's no link... He told me himself - they were just lying. At the same time, his government was being pressured to authorize experimental vaccines for children as young as six months old. No healthy child that age had died anywhere in the world. They were at no risk. And Andrew stood up in the House of Commons and said what I've believed for a long time: any society willing to sacrifice its children to protect adults has lost its way. Just like he said, I expect to make sacrifices for my children. I don't expect them to make sacrifices for me.

Del Bigtree

26,111 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Public Health Agency of Canada finally admits lockdowns wrecked Canadians' mental health: Sheila Gunn Reid Health Canada and PHAC's own data shows youth hospitalizations for mental health issues and self-harm spiked after lockdowns, especially among girls. The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) has quietly admitted what lockdown critics warned about all along: the COVID response left Canadians in a mental health crisis. According to the agency’s latest survey, a staggering 23% of Canadians screened positive for anxiety, depression, or both, and 8% screened positive for post-traumatic stress disorder. These aren’t minor blips. They’re signs of a population still reeling years after the World Health Organization downgraded COVID from a “global threat” to an “ongoing issue.” For years, anyone who dared point out the obvious—that endless lockdowns, shuttered businesses, and forced isolation would have long-term consequences—was mocked as “anti-science.” Now, the government’s own numbers prove them right. And yet, no one who pushed these destructive policies has faced accountability. The politicians, health bureaucrats, and media cheerleaders who demanded we “stay home to stay safe” have skated. At the same time, those control freak ghouls are still on the payroll, or in some cases, are now banning people from the woods in the name of public safety, and writing op-eds to insult those who question the science of hiking causing forest fires. Meanwhile, the Canadians who stood up to end the lockdown madness, like Tamara Lich, Chris Barber and the Freedom Convoy organizers, are the ones dragged through the courts and threatened with jail time. And the worst damage? It was done to kids. PHAC’s own data shows youth hospitalizations for mental health issues and self-harm spiked after lockdowns, especially among girls. Youth in Alberta saw a surge in diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and ADHD, with mortality rates among those in mental-health care more than doubling. Yet the former premier who did it, Jason Kenney, doesn't have the good sense to disappear into well-earned obscurity. He's out there opining about western separation, underestimating the anger once again of the same Albertans who sent him packing for violating their rights with his illegal lockdowns. And they were indeed illegal. National studies confirm what every parent knows: students lost years of learning, socialization, and stability. Life satisfaction, sleep, and school performance all crashed, particularly for girls and already vulnerable youth. Eating disorders among teens exploded, with thousands of hospitalizations, three-quarters of them among girls aged 12–17. This was predictable. It was preventable. And it was warned about in real time. But instead of listening, our leaders chose panic and punishment. Today, Canadians, especially kids, are paying the price. This time is one of those times, I really hate to say I told you so. But we sure did.

Public Health Agency of Canada finally admits lockdowns wrecked Canadians' mental health: Sheila Gunn Reid Health Canada and PHAC's own data shows youth hospitalizations for mental health issues and self-harm spiked after lockdowns, especially among girls. The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) has quietly admitted what lockdown critics warned about all along: the COVID response left Canadians in a mental health crisis. According to the agency’s latest survey, a staggering 23% of Canadians screened positive for anxiety, depression, or both, and 8% screened positive for post-traumatic stress disorder. These aren’t minor blips. They’re signs of a population still reeling years after the World Health Organization downgraded COVID from a “global threat” to an “ongoing issue.” For years, anyone who dared point out the obvious—that endless lockdowns, shuttered businesses, and forced isolation would have long-term consequences—was mocked as “anti-science.” Now, the government’s own numbers prove them right. And yet, no one who pushed these destructive policies has faced accountability. The politicians, health bureaucrats, and media cheerleaders who demanded we “stay home to stay safe” have skated. At the same time, those control freak ghouls are still on the payroll, or in some cases, are now banning people from the woods in the name of public safety, and writing op-eds to insult those who question the science of hiking causing forest fires. Meanwhile, the Canadians who stood up to end the lockdown madness, like Tamara Lich, Chris Barber and the Freedom Convoy organizers, are the ones dragged through the courts and threatened with jail time. And the worst damage? It was done to kids. PHAC’s own data shows youth hospitalizations for mental health issues and self-harm spiked after lockdowns, especially among girls. Youth in Alberta saw a surge in diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and ADHD, with mortality rates among those in mental-health care more than doubling. Yet the former premier who did it, Jason Kenney, doesn't have the good sense to disappear into well-earned obscurity. He's out there opining about western separation, underestimating the anger once again of the same Albertans who sent him packing for violating their rights with his illegal lockdowns. And they were indeed illegal. National studies confirm what every parent knows: students lost years of learning, socialization, and stability. Life satisfaction, sleep, and school performance all crashed, particularly for girls and already vulnerable youth. Eating disorders among teens exploded, with thousands of hospitalizations, three-quarters of them among girls aged 12–17. This was predictable. It was preventable. And it was warned about in real time. But instead of listening, our leaders chose panic and punishment. Today, Canadians, especially kids, are paying the price. This time is one of those times, I really hate to say I told you so. But we sure did.

Rebel News

11,023 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

$🚨 GLOBAL RESET BEGINS: ARGENTINA WALKS AWAY FROM THE WHO Javier Milei has just made a decisive move. Argentina is WITHDRAWING from the World Health Organization — following the path set by Donald Trump. This isn’t symbolic. It’s a direct rejection of supranational control over national health policy. For years, critics have warned that institutions like the WHO were shifting from advisory bodies into policy-driving authorities, influencing lockdowns, mandates, and cross-border health frameworks with little democratic accountability. Milei has now drawn a line: National sovereignty over global compliance. And the implications are significant. If more countries follow, the entire model of centralized global health governance begins to fracture. The real question is no longer if this trend grows — but who follows next. Because in a world of rising crises, nations are being forced to choose: Independent decision-making… or external control.$

🚨 GLOBAL RESET BEGINS: ARGENTINA WALKS AWAY FROM THE WHO Javier Milei has just made a decisive move. Argentina is WITHDRAWING from the World Health Organization — following the path set by Donald Trump. This isn’t symbolic. It’s a direct rejection of supranational control over national health policy. For years, critics have warned that institutions like the WHO were shifting from advisory bodies into policy-driving authorities, influencing lockdowns, mandates, and cross-border health frameworks with little democratic accountability. Milei has now drawn a line: National sovereignty over global compliance. And the implications are significant. If more countries follow, the entire model of centralized global health governance begins to fracture. The real question is no longer if this trend grows — but who follows next. Because in a world of rising crises, nations are being forced to choose: Independent decision-making… or external control.

Jim Ferguson

37,933 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

MUST-WATCH: Prof. Stefan Homburg explains, with surgical precision, why there was no pandemic starting in 2020. "There were no more severe respiratory ilnesses than usual in 2020 and 2021. Corona came, influenza disappeared." "Age-standardised mortality was not higher in 2020 than usual. Mortality only increased since 2021 [just after the "vaccine" roll-out started]." "The idea of a 'pandemic' arose exclusively from new types of mass testing... [which] led the public to believe that there were more sick people and deaths than usual, which was not true." "One must also ask whether the measures [masks, lockdowns etc] were really intended to prevent infection, which they clearly did not, or rather served the purpose of breaking down vaccine hesitancy." Credit: Stefan Homburg

MUST-WATCH: Prof. Stefan Homburg explains, with surgical precision, why there was no pandemic starting in 2020. "There were no more severe respiratory ilnesses than usual in 2020 and 2021. Corona came, influenza disappeared." "Age-standardised mortality was not higher in 2020 than usual. Mortality only increased since 2021 [just after the "vaccine" roll-out started]." "The idea of a 'pandemic' arose exclusively from new types of mass testing... [which] led the public to believe that there were more sick people and deaths than usual, which was not true." "One must also ask whether the measures [masks, lockdowns etc] were really intended to prevent infection, which they clearly did not, or rather served the purpose of breaking down vaccine hesitancy." Credit: Stefan Homburg

Wide Awake Media

780,389 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

One line from Thomas Sowell completely rewired how Konstantin Kisin sees the world: “There are no solutions, only trade-offs.” Kisin says we’ve lost the ability to think like this. We treat every big issue — climate change, the NHS, COVID lockdowns, free speech — as if it has a perfect fix. But every policy, every choice, comes with real costs. Locking down might save some lives but costs others. More free speech means some people will get offended. Trying to “solve” complex problems usually just moves the pain around. The brutal truth? Most of our loud political shouting matches are childish because they pretend one side can magically eliminate problems that are eternal. Once you internalize “no solutions, only trade-offs,” a lot of the noise starts sounding ridiculous. What’s a trade-off you’ve had to accept recently — in politics, health, career, or relationships — that made you realise there really are no pure wins?

One line from Thomas Sowell completely rewired how Konstantin Kisin sees the world: “There are no solutions, only trade-offs.” Kisin says we’ve lost the ability to think like this. We treat every big issue — climate change, the NHS, COVID lockdowns, free speech — as if it has a perfect fix. But every policy, every choice, comes with real costs. Locking down might save some lives but costs others. More free speech means some people will get offended. Trying to “solve” complex problems usually just moves the pain around. The brutal truth? Most of our loud political shouting matches are childish because they pretend one side can magically eliminate problems that are eternal. Once you internalize “no solutions, only trade-offs,” a lot of the noise starts sounding ridiculous. What’s a trade-off you’ve had to accept recently — in politics, health, career, or relationships — that made you realise there really are no pure wins?

Camus

196,182 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Here’s my energetic take on ‘Animal Farm,’ and how it differs greatly from the book since it is not neutral and adds a second communist revolution, and blatantly say communism is the answer as the final resolution. The book it is based on was neither pro nor against capitalism, but the movie displays capitalism solely as greed, with no benefits to the providers of goods or services. How much money did Andy Serkis, a member of the a Socialists Workers party and the producer of this film spend on influencer campaigns!?!?!?

Here’s my energetic take on ‘Animal Farm,’ and how it differs greatly from the book since it is not neutral and adds a second communist revolution, and blatantly say communism is the answer as the final resolution. The book it is based on was neither pro nor against capitalism, but the movie displays capitalism solely as greed, with no benefits to the providers of goods or services. How much money did Andy Serkis, a member of the a Socialists Workers party and the producer of this film spend on influencer campaigns!?!?!?

Angela Rose

30,891 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨🚨 FOLLOW-UP: HOLDEN THORP'S LEGITIMIZATION MACHINE EXPOSED While Ioannidis Faced Death Threats to His Family & Career Destruction for Questioning Lockdowns, Thorp Used Science Magazine to Champion Them Prof. John Ioannidis (Stanford University) in his own words: “Death threats were very commonplace.” “Also to you? Of course. I think both myself and every single member in my family, we were attacked in ways that I could never have imagined…” “The environment was so toxic that the vast majority of credentialed scientists who might have some expertise that would be relevant to epidemiology… Most of those self-silenced.” “If you are attacked in such a way… we would be completely annihilated. We would disappear from the map and our careers would end. Who knows? Maybe we'll be dead.” “The vast majority of credentialed scientists… moved out and they left epidemiology to people who were not epidemiologists.” 🎥 Watch Ioannidis’ own words in full — the toxicity he describes is exactly what Thorp helped normalize. ⚠️ This is the environment Thorp actively helped create and defend. While Ioannidis and other real epidemiologists were being threatened and destroyed, Thorp’s Science Magazine editorials aggressively legitimized lockdowns as “essential science” (2022 “Thank you, Tony!” defending “masks and lockdowns” against “misinformation”; 2020 “Trump lied about science” attacking skeptics). Yet in February 2026 he now admits “anger over the pandemic lockdowns that many Americans now see as avoidable” fueled public distrust — without ever taking responsibility. 📌 Jay Bhattacharya, current NIH Director, said it best: “There is literally no way that the public will regain trust in science with Holden Thorp as the editor of Science. In his position, he embraced lockdowns and dangerous virological research and publicly denigrated scientists who opposed them.” 🔱 ScienceGuardians™ holds no preferences in any fields of science, including various aspects of epidemiology, but strongly believes that politicizing science can lead to severely dangerous consequences, including threats to public health. Donald J. Trump Secretary Kennedy Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD Jay Bhattacharya Elon Musk NIH Research Integrity AAAS

🚨🚨 FOLLOW-UP: HOLDEN THORP'S LEGITIMIZATION MACHINE EXPOSED While Ioannidis Faced Death Threats to His Family & Career Destruction for Questioning Lockdowns, Thorp Used Science Magazine to Champion Them Prof. John Ioannidis (Stanford University) in his own words: “Death threats were very commonplace.” “Also to you? Of course. I think both myself and every single member in my family, we were attacked in ways that I could never have imagined…” “The environment was so toxic that the vast majority of credentialed scientists who might have some expertise that would be relevant to epidemiology… Most of those self-silenced.” “If you are attacked in such a way… we would be completely annihilated. We would disappear from the map and our careers would end. Who knows? Maybe we'll be dead.” “The vast majority of credentialed scientists… moved out and they left epidemiology to people who were not epidemiologists.” 🎥 Watch Ioannidis’ own words in full — the toxicity he describes is exactly what Thorp helped normalize. ⚠️ This is the environment Thorp actively helped create and defend. While Ioannidis and other real epidemiologists were being threatened and destroyed, Thorp’s Science Magazine editorials aggressively legitimized lockdowns as “essential science” (2022 “Thank you, Tony!” defending “masks and lockdowns” against “misinformation”; 2020 “Trump lied about science” attacking skeptics). Yet in February 2026 he now admits “anger over the pandemic lockdowns that many Americans now see as avoidable” fueled public distrust — without ever taking responsibility. 📌 Jay Bhattacharya, current NIH Director, said it best: “There is literally no way that the public will regain trust in science with Holden Thorp as the editor of Science. In his position, he embraced lockdowns and dangerous virological research and publicly denigrated scientists who opposed them.” 🔱 ScienceGuardians™ holds no preferences in any fields of science, including various aspects of epidemiology, but strongly believes that politicizing science can lead to severely dangerous consequences, including threats to public health. Donald J. Trump Secretary Kennedy Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD Jay Bhattacharya Elon Musk NIH Research Integrity AAAS

ScienceGuardians

34,988 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Do people know that in early 2020 Tucker Carlson personally went to Mar-a-Lago to warn Trump about COVID and push for urgent action? Soon after, COVID was framed as a national emergency, power flowed to public-health bureaucracies, and the country entered the era of lockdowns, school closures, and sweeping executive authority. Tucker now denounces all of it, but conveniently skips the part where his intervention, potentially helped light the fuse. Tucker has also said he visited Trump last year during the 12-day war with Iran, this time urging him not to intervene and warning it could trigger World War III. Trump didn’t appear to take his advice on that one.

Do people know that in early 2020 Tucker Carlson personally went to Mar-a-Lago to warn Trump about COVID and push for urgent action? Soon after, COVID was framed as a national emergency, power flowed to public-health bureaucracies, and the country entered the era of lockdowns, school closures, and sweeping executive authority. Tucker now denounces all of it, but conveniently skips the part where his intervention, potentially helped light the fuse. Tucker has also said he visited Trump last year during the 12-day war with Iran, this time urging him not to intervene and warning it could trigger World War III. Trump didn’t appear to take his advice on that one.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

40,088 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

FULL INTERVIEW HERE ON X: "After tabulating, calculating, and quantifying all of the various dimensions of the costs of the [pandemic] lockdown policies, we found that lockdowns are about 30 to 35 times more costly than what they could possibly have delivered in benefits… in terms of human life." This was Gigi Foster's (of Australians for Science and Freedom) stunning revelation to me in June of 2022, based on the results of her own research. I had been well aware that lockdown policies had signficant collateral damage associated with them. Indeed, this was the reason why common-sense public health policy for years had been to avoid them at all costs—until, that is, this was all thrown out the window in early 2020. But I hadn't been ready to accept a 35X differential. The bottom line, according to Gigi, who as a professor at the University of New South Wales is a behavioural economics expert and as such does these sorts of calculations routinely, was always: "How many people would you be willing to kill in order to save one from COVID? That is essentially the trade-off." From skipped cancer screenings to impeded speech development in toddlers to growing social inequality, when we add it all up, what price did we pay? Join me and Gigi to learn the truth in American Thought Leaders 🇺🇸 with @JanJekielek Episode #637, Gigi Foster: Did Our Pandemic Policies Kill More People Than They Saved?, and check out my channel on Box 📦 Club Leader 2.0—I'll post links in the thread below👇

FULL INTERVIEW HERE ON X: "After tabulating, calculating, and quantifying all of the various dimensions of the costs of the [pandemic] lockdown policies, we found that lockdowns are about 30 to 35 times more costly than what they could possibly have delivered in benefits… in terms of human life." This was Gigi Foster's (of Australians for Science and Freedom) stunning revelation to me in June of 2022, based on the results of her own research. I had been well aware that lockdown policies had signficant collateral damage associated with them. Indeed, this was the reason why common-sense public health policy for years had been to avoid them at all costs—until, that is, this was all thrown out the window in early 2020. But I hadn't been ready to accept a 35X differential. The bottom line, according to Gigi, who as a professor at the University of New South Wales is a behavioural economics expert and as such does these sorts of calculations routinely, was always: "How many people would you be willing to kill in order to save one from COVID? That is essentially the trade-off." From skipped cancer screenings to impeded speech development in toddlers to growing social inequality, when we add it all up, what price did we pay? Join me and Gigi to learn the truth in American Thought Leaders 🇺🇸 with @JanJekielek Episode #637, Gigi Foster: Did Our Pandemic Policies Kill More People Than They Saved?, and check out my channel on Box 📦 Club Leader 2.0—I'll post links in the thread below👇

Jan Jekielek

124,953 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Dr. Mark Trozzi exposes a shocking truth: Excess mortality is skyrocketing worldwide—except in countries that rejected the COVID shots. Regions in Africa and Eastern Europe, like Bulgaria and Latvia, are among the few with lower than expected deaths. Everywhere else? A devastating 6%+ excess mortality surge—NOT from COVID, but since the rollout of the shots. Yet, instead of urgent action, governments double down on deception. "A legitimate government would act on 6% excess deaths—not orchestrate a scam," Trozzi asserts, pointing to the failed "coronavirus operation" funded under the previous U.S. administration, with Anthony Fauci at the helm. Trozzi highlights the warnings of epidemiologist Paul Alexander, a former Trump advisor who urged: "No lockdowns. No masks. No mass vaccination. This was never a real pandemic." Alexander, who worked closely with Trump, revealed the president was misled by Fauci—"a good man, duped by bad actors." The data is clear. The question is: Will anyone listen?

Dr. Mark Trozzi exposes a shocking truth: Excess mortality is skyrocketing worldwide—except in countries that rejected the COVID shots. Regions in Africa and Eastern Europe, like Bulgaria and Latvia, are among the few with lower than expected deaths. Everywhere else? A devastating 6%+ excess mortality surge—NOT from COVID, but since the rollout of the shots. Yet, instead of urgent action, governments double down on deception. "A legitimate government would act on 6% excess deaths—not orchestrate a scam," Trozzi asserts, pointing to the failed "coronavirus operation" funded under the previous U.S. administration, with Anthony Fauci at the helm. Trozzi highlights the warnings of epidemiologist Paul Alexander, a former Trump advisor who urged: "No lockdowns. No masks. No mass vaccination. This was never a real pandemic." Alexander, who worked closely with Trump, revealed the president was misled by Fauci—"a good man, duped by bad actors." The data is clear. The question is: Will anyone listen?

Camus

31,457 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Victor Davis Hanson dropped some serious truth bombs about President Trump's foreign policy approach! He explained that Trump isn't some isolationist refusing to engage or a nation-builder wasting blood and treasure - he's a straight-up Jacksonian who picks his fights wisely with massive benefits outweighing any costs. The man nailed it perfectly - no one better as a friend and no one worse as an enemy when you cross the line, and that's exactly how Trump rolls on the world stage!

Victor Davis Hanson dropped some serious truth bombs about President Trump's foreign policy approach! He explained that Trump isn't some isolationist refusing to engage or a nation-builder wasting blood and treasure - he's a straight-up Jacksonian who picks his fights wisely with massive benefits outweighing any costs. The man nailed it perfectly - no one better as a friend and no one worse as an enemy when you cross the line, and that's exactly how Trump rolls on the world stage!

Bill Mitchell

26,366 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Here’s me early in the scamdemic, denouncing lockdowns, already aware the only people at risk were the elderly & those with comorbidities while most people were panicking, obeying & shaming others. Elon Musk also stood up early against the insanity. Where are YOUR receipts? This is a supercut featuring comments from a video I posted to YouTube on 30th April 2020. People went BERSERK, as expected. Fear-induced brain damage is no joke. Maybe you fell victim to it yourself. As for the cowards who had a platform yet said nothing despite knowing what was happening was wrong—here's a mirror🪞. Take a looooooong look.

Here’s me early in the scamdemic, denouncing lockdowns, already aware the only people at risk were the elderly & those with comorbidities while most people were panicking, obeying & shaming others. Elon Musk also stood up early against the insanity. Where are YOUR receipts? This is a supercut featuring comments from a video I posted to YouTube on 30th April 2020. People went BERSERK, as expected. Fear-induced brain damage is no joke. Maybe you fell victim to it yourself. As for the cowards who had a platform yet said nothing despite knowing what was happening was wrong—here's a mirror🪞. Take a looooooong look.

stevenmarkryan

325,579 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

A debate over whether or not Trump had to do Operation Warp Speed (Death): "Trump... funded $18 billion of a campaign that has killed and disabled millions and bankrupted millions of Americans." "But he had to do it to pull us out of lockdowns." "You're saying that if everybody else wants to murder millions of Americans, you have to go along?" This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with David Nino Rodriguez (David Nino Rodriguez) posted to Nino's eponymous YouTube channel on February 5, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Rodriguez: "Trump, when he goes to Davos and it looks really like he's delivering shots across the bow, right? He, he looks like he's declaring war on Davos and the world elite. You know, he pulls out of World Health Organization, the CDC, and it really looks like he's making the right moves. "But then again, I look at this digital, this, digital concentration camp that's coming, and I think to myself, are we really going in the right direction? "What's your thoughts on that? What's your thoughts of him pulling out of the World Health Organization? I mean, he's making all the right moves, right?" Fitts: "No, no, no. So he's made some good moves. If you look at the moves that Kennedy has got him to make, those are good moves. But remember, we continue to allow to be given and encourage to children in a way that's killing children. It's killing people all across the country. "I mean, you know, this is where I got into trouble in the election, because Trump had authorized and funded $18 billion of a campaign that has killed and disabled millions and bankrupted millions of Americans." Rodriguez: "But he had to do it to pull us out of lockdowns." Fitts: "No, no, excuse me. He didn't have to do it. Hold on, hold on." Rodriguez: "But my guests would say. I'm going to say what my guests would say, that he had to do that in order to. Operation Warp Speed is what you're talking about. He had to do that in order to take— Because the elites, the globalists had us planned to be in lockdowns till 2026, and nobody could vote unless they got this." Fitts: "They don't have the power to do that." Rodriguez: "Well, they did it... 2020 happened." Fitts: "No, no, no, no, no, you don't— No one, no one had the power to do that unless the U.S. government and the state governments and the military went along—" Rodriguez: "But they were going along. Everyone was taking this, the military was taking this. All the politicians were in bed with these people. Everyone was compromised. I mean, we all saw it." Fitts: "Wait a minute. You're saying that if everybody else wants to murder millions of Americans, you have to go along?" Rodriguez: "No, no, what I'm saying is, what I'm saying is, I don't think there was any proper move he could have made out of that situation. And he had to go with Operation Warp Speed." Fitts: "No, no, no. There is a proper move he could have made. He said he wasn't going to authorize it. Now, could he have gotten impeached?" Rodriguez: "But he had to get the economy moving and get everyone out of lockdowns, correct? And move us forward. Otherwise, we would have stayed in lockdowns until 2026." Fitts: "Nobody has to. I've been a government official. Nobody has to break the law. Nobody has to murder somebody, okay? He put someone in charge of Operation Warp Speed. You know what his expertise was? The guy who ran Operation Warp Speed? ... it was a guy who'd been head of research at one of the big pharmaceutical companies whose expertise was brain–machine interface. So if you talk about the nanoparticles that were in the shots, what does that have to do with the mark of the beast? Probably something."

A debate over whether or not Trump had to do Operation Warp Speed (Death): "Trump... funded $18 billion of a campaign that has killed and disabled millions and bankrupted millions of Americans." "But he had to do it to pull us out of lockdowns." "You're saying that if everybody else wants to murder millions of Americans, you have to go along?" This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with David Nino Rodriguez (David Nino Rodriguez) posted to Nino's eponymous YouTube channel on February 5, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Rodriguez: "Trump, when he goes to Davos and it looks really like he's delivering shots across the bow, right? He, he looks like he's declaring war on Davos and the world elite. You know, he pulls out of World Health Organization, the CDC, and it really looks like he's making the right moves. "But then again, I look at this digital, this, digital concentration camp that's coming, and I think to myself, are we really going in the right direction? "What's your thoughts on that? What's your thoughts of him pulling out of the World Health Organization? I mean, he's making all the right moves, right?" Fitts: "No, no, no. So he's made some good moves. If you look at the moves that Kennedy has got him to make, those are good moves. But remember, we continue to allow to be given and encourage to children in a way that's killing children. It's killing people all across the country. "I mean, you know, this is where I got into trouble in the election, because Trump had authorized and funded $18 billion of a campaign that has killed and disabled millions and bankrupted millions of Americans." Rodriguez: "But he had to do it to pull us out of lockdowns." Fitts: "No, no, excuse me. He didn't have to do it. Hold on, hold on." Rodriguez: "But my guests would say. I'm going to say what my guests would say, that he had to do that in order to. Operation Warp Speed is what you're talking about. He had to do that in order to take— Because the elites, the globalists had us planned to be in lockdowns till 2026, and nobody could vote unless they got this." Fitts: "They don't have the power to do that." Rodriguez: "Well, they did it... 2020 happened." Fitts: "No, no, no, no, no, you don't— No one, no one had the power to do that unless the U.S. government and the state governments and the military went along—" Rodriguez: "But they were going along. Everyone was taking this, the military was taking this. All the politicians were in bed with these people. Everyone was compromised. I mean, we all saw it." Fitts: "Wait a minute. You're saying that if everybody else wants to murder millions of Americans, you have to go along?" Rodriguez: "No, no, what I'm saying is, what I'm saying is, I don't think there was any proper move he could have made out of that situation. And he had to go with Operation Warp Speed." Fitts: "No, no, no. There is a proper move he could have made. He said he wasn't going to authorize it. Now, could he have gotten impeached?" Rodriguez: "But he had to get the economy moving and get everyone out of lockdowns, correct? And move us forward. Otherwise, we would have stayed in lockdowns until 2026." Fitts: "Nobody has to. I've been a government official. Nobody has to break the law. Nobody has to murder somebody, okay? He put someone in charge of Operation Warp Speed. You know what his expertise was? The guy who ran Operation Warp Speed? ... it was a guy who'd been head of research at one of the big pharmaceutical companies whose expertise was brain–machine interface. So if you talk about the nanoparticles that were in the shots, what does that have to do with the mark of the beast? Probably something."

Sense Receptor

26,966 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

In July of 2020, at the height of COVID lockdowns and global panic, Klaus Schwab released a book called COVID-19: The Great Reset. At the time, many dismissed concerns about the “Great Reset” as “conspiracy theory.” But the people who actually read the book noticed it openly described a future built where our God-Given freedoms would degrade into “privileges” under the guise of safety. Vaccine passports were just the beginning of the nightmarish dystopia planned for humanity. Then something remarkable happened. Millions of people around the world started pushing back. After years of lockdowns, mandates, censorship, inflation, and growing distrust in global institutions, people began rejecting the idea that unelected organizations, corporations, and governments should have increasing control over everyday life. By 2024, many conservatives believed that tide had finally turned. Donald Trump’s victory was seen by supporters as a direct rejection of open-border globalism and the WHO/WEF worldview. For a moment, it felt like the Great Reset had been stopped in its tracks. But while much of the public relaxed and assumed the fight was over, the underlying systems never actually stopped expanding. And that’s exactly what makes the conversation with Tom Renz so unsettling. Because he’s been paying close attention and says the Great Reset actually didn’t fail. It’s that people stopped noticing it was still moving forward. He joins us now. 🧵

In July of 2020, at the height of COVID lockdowns and global panic, Klaus Schwab released a book called COVID-19: The Great Reset. At the time, many dismissed concerns about the “Great Reset” as “conspiracy theory.” But the people who actually read the book noticed it openly described a future built where our God-Given freedoms would degrade into “privileges” under the guise of safety. Vaccine passports were just the beginning of the nightmarish dystopia planned for humanity. Then something remarkable happened. Millions of people around the world started pushing back. After years of lockdowns, mandates, censorship, inflation, and growing distrust in global institutions, people began rejecting the idea that unelected organizations, corporations, and governments should have increasing control over everyday life. By 2024, many conservatives believed that tide had finally turned. Donald Trump’s victory was seen by supporters as a direct rejection of open-border globalism and the WHO/WEF worldview. For a moment, it felt like the Great Reset had been stopped in its tracks. But while much of the public relaxed and assumed the fight was over, the underlying systems never actually stopped expanding. And that’s exactly what makes the conversation with Tom Renz so unsettling. Because he’s been paying close attention and says the Great Reset actually didn’t fail. It’s that people stopped noticing it was still moving forward. He joins us now. 🧵

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

74,943 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

‼Dr. Jonathan Engler (Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB) just dropped a bombshell: He believes there was no pandemic. That there were zero new pathogens added to humanity's disease pool in 2020. As both a doctor and lawyer, Dr. Engler breaks down how he sees that the "COVID crisis" was actually a carefully orchestrated propaganda event using mass testing and media manipulation. Timestamps 05:02 No new dangerous pathogens were added to humanity's respiratory illness pool 09:25 How lockdowns contradicted established respiratory virus science 19:58 The problems with trusting official mortality data 21:30 Understanding the inflammatory effects of mRNA injections 35:19 The profound impact of the nocebo effect on public health 48:08 Why countries should leave the WHO and reject centralisation 50:43 How mass formation led to bizarre theatrical behaviour during COVID Must-watch for anyone questioning the official narrative and seeking truth about what really happened in 2020.

‼Dr. Jonathan Engler (Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB) just dropped a bombshell: He believes there was no pandemic. That there were zero new pathogens added to humanity's disease pool in 2020. As both a doctor and lawyer, Dr. Engler breaks down how he sees that the "COVID crisis" was actually a carefully orchestrated propaganda event using mass testing and media manipulation. Timestamps 05:02 No new dangerous pathogens were added to humanity's respiratory illness pool 09:25 How lockdowns contradicted established respiratory virus science 19:58 The problems with trusting official mortality data 21:30 Understanding the inflammatory effects of mRNA injections 35:19 The profound impact of the nocebo effect on public health 48:08 Why countries should leave the WHO and reject centralisation 50:43 How mass formation led to bizarre theatrical behaviour during COVID Must-watch for anyone questioning the official narrative and seeking truth about what really happened in 2020.

Eddie Hobbs 1215

21,878 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr