Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

As the interview moved toward its conclusion, Jay widened the lens beyond Epstein to the Orwellian system taking shape around us. He described the endgame as a “global hive mind,” a structure where surveillance, AI, behavioral conditioning, and economic control fuse into one framework. He referenced elite discussions of...

VigilantFox's profile picture

Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,963,069 subscribers

13,140 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Larry Fink’s "Evolution" on Bitcoin Is a Masterclass in Oligarchic Hypocrisy BlackRock CEO & WEF co-chairman Larry Fink just admitted he was "wrong" about Bitcoin. But his confession reveals a chilling worldview. In 2017, he stood with Jamie Dimon, dismissing Bitcoin as the "currency for money launderers and thieves." Today, BlackRock runs the world's largest Bitcoin ETF. What changed? According to Fink, it wasn't a moral awakening; it was a cold, calculated realization of where true power lies in a decaying global system. Here’s what Fink is really saying: - Bitcoin is the "Currency of Fear." He admits people don't buy it out of hope, but out of desperation. They are "frightened of their security" and "frightened of the debasement" of their national currency. He sees the crumbling faith in the very fiat system his institution profits from. - It's a Tool for Bypassing Failed States. He learned of an Afghan woman using Bitcoin to pay female workers under the Taliban. His takeaway? When state-controlled banking becomes an instrument of oppression or collapses, decentralized networks become essential. He’s not celebrating freedom; he’s acknowledging a new, unstoppable geopolitical reality. - He Admits Its Illicit Use Case is Overblown. By highlighting that 20% of Bitcoin ownership is Chinese despite it being illegal, he implicitly concedes its primary use is not crime, but as a safeguard against authoritarian capital controls and economic instability. The Stunning Conclusion: Fink’s journey is the ultimate indictment of the system he helps lead. He now embraces Bitcoin not because he believes in its libertarian ideals, but because he recognizes it as the inevitable "digital gold" for a world losing trust in governments and central banks. BlackRock isn't "believing" in Bitcoin; it's commodifying your fear. They failed to kill it, so now they're seizing it, packaging it into an ETF, and selling your desperation back to you. The man who called it a tool for thieves now runs the world's biggest vault. The "evolution" isn't in Fink's character; it's in his strategy to control the very asset built to escape his control.
2:28

Larry Fink’s "Evolution" on Bitcoin Is a Masterclass in Oligarchic Hypocrisy BlackRock CEO & WEF co-chairman Larry Fink just admitted he was "wrong" about Bitcoin. But his confession reveals a chilling worldview. In 2017, he stood with Jamie Dimon, dismissing Bitcoin as the "currency for money launderers and thieves." Today, BlackRock runs the world's largest Bitcoin ETF. What changed? According to Fink, it wasn't a moral awakening; it was a cold, calculated realization of where true power lies in a decaying global system. Here’s what Fink is really saying: - Bitcoin is the "Currency of Fear." He admits people don't buy it out of hope, but out of desperation. They are "frightened of their security" and "frightened of the debasement" of their national currency. He sees the crumbling faith in the very fiat system his institution profits from. - It's a Tool for Bypassing Failed States. He learned of an Afghan woman using Bitcoin to pay female workers under the Taliban. His takeaway? When state-controlled banking becomes an instrument of oppression or collapses, decentralized networks become essential. He’s not celebrating freedom; he’s acknowledging a new, unstoppable geopolitical reality. - He Admits Its Illicit Use Case is Overblown. By highlighting that 20% of Bitcoin ownership is Chinese despite it being illegal, he implicitly concedes its primary use is not crime, but as a safeguard against authoritarian capital controls and economic instability. The Stunning Conclusion: Fink’s journey is the ultimate indictment of the system he helps lead. He now embraces Bitcoin not because he believes in its libertarian ideals, but because he recognizes it as the inevitable "digital gold" for a world losing trust in governments and central banks. BlackRock isn't "believing" in Bitcoin; it's commodifying your fear. They failed to kill it, so now they're seizing it, packaging it into an ETF, and selling your desperation back to you. The man who called it a tool for thieves now runs the world's biggest vault. The "evolution" isn't in Fink's character; it's in his strategy to control the very asset built to escape his control.

Camus

16,327 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."
6:11

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."

Sense Receptor

13,996 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock and a WEF co-chair, just gave a masterclass in globalist doublespeak. A critical listen reveals the true agenda. What he says is that the US dollar's dominance is fading due to digital currency, and we must "unlock private capital" to grow. What he means is far more revealing: 1. On Currency: The move toward "stable coins" and digital currency isn't a passive trend; it's an active project. Fink & the WEF envision a future where they, not nation-states, control the monetary rails. The diminishing role of the dollar is a feature, not a bug, of this planned system. 2. On "Unlocking Private Capital": This is the core euphemism. It doesn't mean freeing entrepreneurs. It means systematically removing democratic hurdles—like "streamlining permitting" and regulations—that protect citizens and national sovereignty. It’s about handing the keys of the economy to a consortium of mega-corporations and financial giants like BlackRock. 3. On "Growth": His message to Japan and Italy is a threat: grow on our terms or be crushed by your deficits. It's the language of a financial technocrat who sees nations not as sovereign cultures, but as balance sheets to be managed and consolidated. Most chillingly, Fink claims there is less systemic risk because risks are now hidden in the opaque, unregulated world of private credit. He admits a "big credit event" is coming, but dismisses it as "just losses." This is the ultimate arrogance: the architects of this new system believe they've offloaded the risk onto you—the investor, the saver, the citizen—while insulating themselves. The summary is clear: The future Fink envisions is one of centralized digital control, uneconomic growth mandates, and a financial system where the losses are yours, but the control is theirs.
1:49

Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock and a WEF co-chair, just gave a masterclass in globalist doublespeak. A critical listen reveals the true agenda. What he says is that the US dollar's dominance is fading due to digital currency, and we must "unlock private capital" to grow. What he means is far more revealing: 1. On Currency: The move toward "stable coins" and digital currency isn't a passive trend; it's an active project. Fink & the WEF envision a future where they, not nation-states, control the monetary rails. The diminishing role of the dollar is a feature, not a bug, of this planned system. 2. On "Unlocking Private Capital": This is the core euphemism. It doesn't mean freeing entrepreneurs. It means systematically removing democratic hurdles—like "streamlining permitting" and regulations—that protect citizens and national sovereignty. It’s about handing the keys of the economy to a consortium of mega-corporations and financial giants like BlackRock. 3. On "Growth": His message to Japan and Italy is a threat: grow on our terms or be crushed by your deficits. It's the language of a financial technocrat who sees nations not as sovereign cultures, but as balance sheets to be managed and consolidated. Most chillingly, Fink claims there is less systemic risk because risks are now hidden in the opaque, unregulated world of private credit. He admits a "big credit event" is coming, but dismisses it as "just losses." This is the ultimate arrogance: the architects of this new system believe they've offloaded the risk onto you—the investor, the saver, the citizen—while insulating themselves. The summary is clear: The future Fink envisions is one of centralized digital control, uneconomic growth mandates, and a financial system where the losses are yours, but the control is theirs.

Camus

115,011 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Nine years ago, Bill Gates laid out his vision for India's digital future. Watching his remarks today, the prescience is chilling. He didn't just predict digital transactions; he outlined the blueprint for a system of total control, disguised as "financial inclusion." Gates speaks of the "pieces falling into place." What pieces? A mandatory Digital ID (Aadhaar) to link every citizen to the system. A "low-cost fund switch" (UPI) to monitor every transaction. And eventually, the crown jewel: programmable Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). He praises the "agent network" and "cash in, cash out" for now. But his real goal is the phase he glosses over: "first money transfer but eventually most of your payments." The endgame is a cashless society where every financial move is recorded, tracked, and permissioned. Listen closely to what he celebrates: A system where to borrow money, you must "offer up my history of transactions." A system where your social circle can be instantly tapped to "guarantee the loan." A system where a farmer's income from his crop can be automatically "set aside" by the platform—not by his own choice, but by a pre-programmed rule. This isn't innovation. It is the ultimate paternalistic control grid. Digital ID: The key to the prison. Your identity becomes a token to access the system that controls you. CBDCs: The bars on the cell. Programmable money that can be turned off, restricted to certain purchases, or expired to force spending. "Innovative Products": The justification for the prison. "Helping" the farmer save, "guiding" your spending, "offering" social credit loans. Bill Gates doesn't see a billion individuals. He sees a billion data points to be managed, optimized, and controlled under the guise of help. He said India would lead the world in this model. He was right. The world is watching to see if the world's largest democracy will become the world's most sophisticated digital panopticon.
1:52

Nine years ago, Bill Gates laid out his vision for India's digital future. Watching his remarks today, the prescience is chilling. He didn't just predict digital transactions; he outlined the blueprint for a system of total control, disguised as "financial inclusion." Gates speaks of the "pieces falling into place." What pieces? A mandatory Digital ID (Aadhaar) to link every citizen to the system. A "low-cost fund switch" (UPI) to monitor every transaction. And eventually, the crown jewel: programmable Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). He praises the "agent network" and "cash in, cash out" for now. But his real goal is the phase he glosses over: "first money transfer but eventually most of your payments." The endgame is a cashless society where every financial move is recorded, tracked, and permissioned. Listen closely to what he celebrates: A system where to borrow money, you must "offer up my history of transactions." A system where your social circle can be instantly tapped to "guarantee the loan." A system where a farmer's income from his crop can be automatically "set aside" by the platform—not by his own choice, but by a pre-programmed rule. This isn't innovation. It is the ultimate paternalistic control grid. Digital ID: The key to the prison. Your identity becomes a token to access the system that controls you. CBDCs: The bars on the cell. Programmable money that can be turned off, restricted to certain purchases, or expired to force spending. "Innovative Products": The justification for the prison. "Helping" the farmer save, "guiding" your spending, "offering" social credit loans. Bill Gates doesn't see a billion individuals. He sees a billion data points to be managed, optimized, and controlled under the guise of help. He said India would lead the world in this model. He was right. The world is watching to see if the world's largest democracy will become the world's most sophisticated digital panopticon.

Camus

26,382 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Why Elon didn't want to be CEO: "[Elon] is at core, an engineer and a product guy. He has this great line where he said: "I realized you couldn't be fully in control of the product unless you were also in control of the company." He says he made a moral error, early in Tesla, where he was trying to have his cake and eat it too. He wanted to control the company without running the company. And that was the 2002 to 2008 era, where Tesla was just off to a really messy start. He was providing the funding. He was chairman of the board. But Martin Eberhard was CEO. Eventually, when Tesla was on the verge of death in 2008....Elon was pushed into the position of: "I have to be CEO. I don't want to be. It comes with a lot of chores. It comes with a lot of responsibilities. But if I want this company to be successful, I have to fully internalize and take responsibility for it." And that's what he did, even though he was also in the same position at SpaceX. The fact that these companies are improbable, iconic, and that he funded and led them both in parallel...it's like running a two minute mile twice at the same time. It is such a higher degree of difficulty than most people can conceive of, and the fact that it worked is still unbelievable."
4:24

Why Elon didn't want to be CEO: "[Elon] is at core, an engineer and a product guy. He has this great line where he said: "I realized you couldn't be fully in control of the product unless you were also in control of the company." He says he made a moral error, early in Tesla, where he was trying to have his cake and eat it too. He wanted to control the company without running the company. And that was the 2002 to 2008 era, where Tesla was just off to a really messy start. He was providing the funding. He was chairman of the board. But Martin Eberhard was CEO. Eventually, when Tesla was on the verge of death in 2008....Elon was pushed into the position of: "I have to be CEO. I don't want to be. It comes with a lot of chores. It comes with a lot of responsibilities. But if I want this company to be successful, I have to fully internalize and take responsibility for it." And that's what he did, even though he was also in the same position at SpaceX. The fact that these companies are improbable, iconic, and that he funded and led them both in parallel...it's like running a two minute mile twice at the same time. It is such a higher degree of difficulty than most people can conceive of, and the fact that it worked is still unbelievable."

Ti Morse

47,497 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

How Jeffrey Epstein rose from maths nerd, to a financial fixer for elites, to the boss of blackmail: ‘If you look at Epstein’s operation, what it looks like to me is that it’s a criminal operation on a number of different levels. Epstein is an interesting case because where does he come from? Well, he doesn’t come from a wealthy family. He doesn’t come from an influential family. He was a Long Island kid who was good at mathematics…he was a kind of smart, nerdy kid who made friends by doing their math homework. You’re not popular because you’re a jock. You’re not popular necessarily because you’re that good-looking or you dance well. You’re popular because you can do other people’s math homework and get them to pass. His whole career is ingratiating himself to wealthy, powerful people. What did he do as a financial advisor? Look at it. Just stand back and look at what he did. And what he did was that he helped them dodge taxes. He also helped them hide money. He could help people discover money that had been hidden abroad. He could help them hide money. If you do one, you can do the other. And that’s how he moved as a kind of fixer and arranger into the realm of the rich and powerful. And in that process, either he or other people who were working with him found out that these people can be compromised in a number of ways. And so then you start installing cameras in your residences, in the bedrooms and the bathrooms. There’s only one reason you do that. It’s fairly simple. The only reason why you collect all of this video information on your rich and powerful friends is to potentially use it as leverage against them. You don’t have to actually use it. You simply have to make them aware that you have it and could use it.’ -Prof. Richard Spence on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW:
3:19

How Jeffrey Epstein rose from maths nerd, to a financial fixer for elites, to the boss of blackmail: ‘If you look at Epstein’s operation, what it looks like to me is that it’s a criminal operation on a number of different levels. Epstein is an interesting case because where does he come from? Well, he doesn’t come from a wealthy family. He doesn’t come from an influential family. He was a Long Island kid who was good at mathematics…he was a kind of smart, nerdy kid who made friends by doing their math homework. You’re not popular because you’re a jock. You’re not popular necessarily because you’re that good-looking or you dance well. You’re popular because you can do other people’s math homework and get them to pass. His whole career is ingratiating himself to wealthy, powerful people. What did he do as a financial advisor? Look at it. Just stand back and look at what he did. And what he did was that he helped them dodge taxes. He also helped them hide money. He could help people discover money that had been hidden abroad. He could help them hide money. If you do one, you can do the other. And that’s how he moved as a kind of fixer and arranger into the realm of the rich and powerful. And in that process, either he or other people who were working with him found out that these people can be compromised in a number of ways. And so then you start installing cameras in your residences, in the bedrooms and the bathrooms. There’s only one reason you do that. It’s fairly simple. The only reason why you collect all of this video information on your rich and powerful friends is to potentially use it as leverage against them. You don’t have to actually use it. You simply have to make them aware that you have it and could use it.’ -Prof. Richard Spence on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW:

Going Underground

68,766 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Blueface opened up about whether he is still beefing with DJ Akademiks, saying he doesn’t see Ak as someone he has beef with because everything he says and does is only for content👀 “The way he moves is like less encountery with the people he talks about. He’s more like a come around if he has control over the environment—when it comes to snitches and people that were PC in jail and not be a tough as me, I really don’t get too threatened to beef or be like I wanna do something to you. I see it as content.”
2:00

Blueface opened up about whether he is still beefing with DJ Akademiks, saying he doesn’t see Ak as someone he has beef with because everything he says and does is only for content👀 “The way he moves is like less encountery with the people he talks about. He’s more like a come around if he has control over the environment—when it comes to snitches and people that were PC in jail and not be a tough as me, I really don’t get too threatened to beef or be like I wanna do something to you. I see it as content.”

ɖʌѵє✰

25,513 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Analyst: The idea that Donald Trump was going to unrig the system and drain the swamp was central to his message. And he has done nothing but double down on the notion that the system exists for and by the elites, whether it is the affordability crisis, the tariffs, immigration enforcement that is terrorizing a large portion of this country. And then you have his behavior around the Epstein files.
1:28

Analyst: The idea that Donald Trump was going to unrig the system and drain the swamp was central to his message. And he has done nothing but double down on the notion that the system exists for and by the elites, whether it is the affordability crisis, the tariffs, immigration enforcement that is terrorizing a large portion of this country. And then you have his behavior around the Epstein files.

FactPost

16,191 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Would you bet EVERYTHING on one idea? Michael Saylor did. Michael is a technology entrepreneur and the founder of the company now called Strategy. Long before Bitcoin, he built businesses in business intelligence, speech recognition and smart-home technology. Today, he is probably best known for turning his company into the world’s largest corporate holder of Bitcoin. In 2020, his company was worth around $600 million when he made what I described to him as an “early, very contrarian bet on Bitcoin”. At its peak, the company reached roughly $125 billion. I wanted to understand what Michael saw that almost everyone else didn’t, where that level of conviction comes from, and why his thinking goes far beyond Bitcoin. We discussed things like: - How he says AI helped him create $15 billion last year. - Why he believes buying a house might not be the best way to build wealth. - What he would study if he was 18 today. - Which careers AI could completely transform. - What is happening to the value of the money sitting in your bank. - Why he still has such enormous conviction in Bitcoin. Michael’s whole point is that technology, money and careers are not separate conversations. He sees them as connected parts of where the world is heading, and believes the decisions we make now could matter far more than most people realise. Even if you see the world differently to Michael, there is a lot to take from the way he thinks. His experience building technology companies, making enormous financial bets and thinking deeply about AI gives him a perspective on money, work and the future that is worth listening to. Out now on all platforms. Let me know what you think of this one in the comments ❤️👊🏾
1:53

Would you bet EVERYTHING on one idea? Michael Saylor did. Michael is a technology entrepreneur and the founder of the company now called Strategy. Long before Bitcoin, he built businesses in business intelligence, speech recognition and smart-home technology. Today, he is probably best known for turning his company into the world’s largest corporate holder of Bitcoin. In 2020, his company was worth around $600 million when he made what I described to him as an “early, very contrarian bet on Bitcoin”. At its peak, the company reached roughly $125 billion. I wanted to understand what Michael saw that almost everyone else didn’t, where that level of conviction comes from, and why his thinking goes far beyond Bitcoin. We discussed things like: - How he says AI helped him create $15 billion last year. - Why he believes buying a house might not be the best way to build wealth. - What he would study if he was 18 today. - Which careers AI could completely transform. - What is happening to the value of the money sitting in your bank. - Why he still has such enormous conviction in Bitcoin. Michael’s whole point is that technology, money and careers are not separate conversations. He sees them as connected parts of where the world is heading, and believes the decisions we make now could matter far more than most people realise. Even if you see the world differently to Michael, there is a lot to take from the way he thinks. His experience building technology companies, making enormous financial bets and thinking deeply about AI gives him a perspective on money, work and the future that is worth listening to. Out now on all platforms. Let me know what you think of this one in the comments ❤️👊🏾

Steven Bartlett

144,640 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

Catherine Austin Fitts: "Trump... let the central banks give Wall Street $5 trillion... [and] shut down Main Street [during Covid]... [and he] funded $18 billion to the military [for Warp Speed,] which has killed and disabled millions of Americans... He could have stopped that" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Christian Elliot posted to the Deconstructing Convention YouTube channel on January 24, 2026. *Note that I did not make the subtitles in the video. They are from the source video. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "My problem with Trump is, if you look at what he did when he was president, he delivered the worst shock yet that America has experienced by giving, you know, he let the central banks give Wall Street 5 trillion, and then he, he helped shut down Main Street. He could have stopped that. "Now, I don't think he felt politically able to stop it because the media was so strong, but let's face it, he funded 18 billion to the military to authorize, a vaccination program which has killed and, disabled millions of Americans. That was Trump. "So f you want to give that. The question is, why did he do it? If you wanted to give that the most generous interpretation, what I would say, he's in a system and he feels like he can't, you know, he can't make the system turn if the system wants more central control. "And I'll be blunt, I think the people who are doing Gaza, are very interested in financial transaction control. And I think the pressure on anybody who goes into that position, but including Trump, to get Trump to sell a digital ID through immigration, you know, dealing with immigration or dealing with election fraud, the pressure on him to get a digital ID by the central bankers will be fierce. And the only way we can stop it is to push back hard."
1:33

Catherine Austin Fitts: "Trump... let the central banks give Wall Street $5 trillion... [and] shut down Main Street [during Covid]... [and he] funded $18 billion to the military [for Warp Speed,] which has killed and disabled millions of Americans... He could have stopped that" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Christian Elliot posted to the Deconstructing Convention YouTube channel on January 24, 2026. *Note that I did not make the subtitles in the video. They are from the source video. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "My problem with Trump is, if you look at what he did when he was president, he delivered the worst shock yet that America has experienced by giving, you know, he let the central banks give Wall Street 5 trillion, and then he, he helped shut down Main Street. He could have stopped that. "Now, I don't think he felt politically able to stop it because the media was so strong, but let's face it, he funded 18 billion to the military to authorize, a vaccination program which has killed and, disabled millions of Americans. That was Trump. "So f you want to give that. The question is, why did he do it? If you wanted to give that the most generous interpretation, what I would say, he's in a system and he feels like he can't, you know, he can't make the system turn if the system wants more central control. "And I'll be blunt, I think the people who are doing Gaza, are very interested in financial transaction control. And I think the pressure on anybody who goes into that position, but including Trump, to get Trump to sell a digital ID through immigration, you know, dealing with immigration or dealing with election fraud, the pressure on him to get a digital ID by the central bankers will be fierce. And the only way we can stop it is to push back hard."

Sense Receptor

43,180 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Neil Oliver issues a stark warning about the government's proposed Digital ID, the "BritCard." He identifies it not as a simple piece of plastic, but as the integrated surveillance mechanism that will end privacy forever. This Digital ID system is designed to be the single key to your entire life: banking, benefits, driving licence, health records, and voting rights. Oliver argues this creates a citizen who is "digitally visible to the state across every transaction." Your movements, spending, online activity, and even the protests you attend would be tracked, recorded, and stored permanently. He dismisses the promises of "free" convenience and "great efficiency" as a dangerous illusion. This Digital ID is the pre-prepared, "oven-ready" solution that was waiting for a crisis to justify its rollout. It transforms your inherent rights into state-granted privileges that can be revoked if your behaviour fails to align with official orthodoxy. Refuse a future diktat? Your funds could be frozen. Your freedom to travel, curtailed. Oliver concludes that the "Brit" in BritCard is a misnomer; it has nothing to do with British liberty. It rhymes, instead, with a word that describes a cage. This Digital ID system hands the mechanisms of total control to governments and the unelected global entities that pull their strings. The hill to die on is this one. The fight is against the BritCard Digital ID.
3:33

Neil Oliver issues a stark warning about the government's proposed Digital ID, the "BritCard." He identifies it not as a simple piece of plastic, but as the integrated surveillance mechanism that will end privacy forever. This Digital ID system is designed to be the single key to your entire life: banking, benefits, driving licence, health records, and voting rights. Oliver argues this creates a citizen who is "digitally visible to the state across every transaction." Your movements, spending, online activity, and even the protests you attend would be tracked, recorded, and stored permanently. He dismisses the promises of "free" convenience and "great efficiency" as a dangerous illusion. This Digital ID is the pre-prepared, "oven-ready" solution that was waiting for a crisis to justify its rollout. It transforms your inherent rights into state-granted privileges that can be revoked if your behaviour fails to align with official orthodoxy. Refuse a future diktat? Your funds could be frozen. Your freedom to travel, curtailed. Oliver concludes that the "Brit" in BritCard is a misnomer; it has nothing to do with British liberty. It rhymes, instead, with a word that describes a cage. This Digital ID system hands the mechanisms of total control to governments and the unelected global entities that pull their strings. The hill to die on is this one. The fight is against the BritCard Digital ID.

Camus

78,970 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Regarding Neil Ferguson “And so my conclusion from that is not that he was stupid or that he was doing bad science. He wasn't doing bad science. He was doing exactly what he needed to do and he was paid to do it and he did it knowingly and intentionally. So I think it's a mistake to go too deep into showing how these papers are scientifically wrong and he didn't consider this and he didn't consider that and the model is this and the model is that. From the beginning, the entire thing is just a piece of propaganda. So his job is to be a propagandist. And so anything that he puts out cannot be analyzed or considered as a scientific production. It is not a production of anything that has to do with science. It is a production of propaganda and public relations.” Debbie Lerman Episode 445 NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO US
0:52

Regarding Neil Ferguson “And so my conclusion from that is not that he was stupid or that he was doing bad science. He wasn't doing bad science. He was doing exactly what he needed to do and he was paid to do it and he did it knowingly and intentionally. So I think it's a mistake to go too deep into showing how these papers are scientifically wrong and he didn't consider this and he didn't consider that and the model is this and the model is that. From the beginning, the entire thing is just a piece of propaganda. So his job is to be a propagandist. And so anything that he puts out cannot be analyzed or considered as a scientific production. It is not a production of anything that has to do with science. It is a production of propaganda and public relations.” Debbie Lerman Episode 445 NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO US

Doc Malik

11,609 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

The neighbor insists that his property line is right where this gentleman’s fence is being built. In the middle of the night, he came by and cut down the newly installed fence, and even took a sledge hammer to the new driveway installed as well because he feels it’s on his property line. The gentleman went ahead and got a survey done and clearly showed not only he was wrong, but much of the neighbors “property” is actually his. He hasn’t called the cops because he didn’t get it on video but he knows it was him. Is there anything else he can do at this point?
3:26

The neighbor insists that his property line is right where this gentleman’s fence is being built. In the middle of the night, he came by and cut down the newly installed fence, and even took a sledge hammer to the new driveway installed as well because he feels it’s on his property line. The gentleman went ahead and got a survey done and clearly showed not only he was wrong, but much of the neighbors “property” is actually his. He hasn’t called the cops because he didn’t get it on video but he knows it was him. Is there anything else he can do at this point?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,025,077 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

HOLEE SHIZZLES‼️ 🚨 RFK JR Sounds the Alarm on the WHO IHR Amendment's — A “Trojan Horse” is Quietly being Installed to implement Digital Health ID's and a Global Health Database • he expresses concerns about the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) and their potential to "open the door" to "that kind of system of health IDs," suggesting a pathway to broader surveillance and control mechanisms. • He says the WHO is laying the groundwork for a CENTRALIZED Medical Database for every human being • He connects the potential for digital health IDs to broader issues of surveillance and industry influence. He Mentions Mass "surveillance" and he refers to "industry influence," implying that these IDs could be part of a larger mass surveillance framework that benefits certain industries while encroaching on individual privacy and freedoms. • Kennedy's concerns are framed within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, where he believes critical information and criticisms were suppressed. He suggests that the amendments could perpetuate similar dynamics, potentially using digital health IDs as a tool for narrative management and censorship, as seen during the pandemic. - His overall stance is that such measures, including digital health IDs, could jeopardize civil liberties and national sovereignty. He argues that the U.S. should not sign over authority that could lead to lockdowns and other public health measures without thorough consideration, especially when these measures might invite a system that undermines individual rights. What’s next? - Proposal and Adoption Process: The amendments were proposed and negotiated through the World Health Organization (WHO) processes, in an agreement by the World Health Assembly in May 2024 [World Health Assembly, 2024]. However, the implementation of these amendments is not automatic and requires further steps. - Opt-Out Period: There is a specific window for member states to opt out of these amendments. The U.S. and other countries have until NEXT WEEK, to formally reject the amendments. This opt-out period is crucial because it allows countries to decide whether to be bound by the new regulations.
4:49

HOLEE SHIZZLES‼️ 🚨 RFK JR Sounds the Alarm on the WHO IHR Amendment's — A “Trojan Horse” is Quietly being Installed to implement Digital Health ID's and a Global Health Database • he expresses concerns about the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) and their potential to "open the door" to "that kind of system of health IDs," suggesting a pathway to broader surveillance and control mechanisms. • He says the WHO is laying the groundwork for a CENTRALIZED Medical Database for every human being • He connects the potential for digital health IDs to broader issues of surveillance and industry influence. He Mentions Mass "surveillance" and he refers to "industry influence," implying that these IDs could be part of a larger mass surveillance framework that benefits certain industries while encroaching on individual privacy and freedoms. • Kennedy's concerns are framed within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, where he believes critical information and criticisms were suppressed. He suggests that the amendments could perpetuate similar dynamics, potentially using digital health IDs as a tool for narrative management and censorship, as seen during the pandemic. - His overall stance is that such measures, including digital health IDs, could jeopardize civil liberties and national sovereignty. He argues that the U.S. should not sign over authority that could lead to lockdowns and other public health measures without thorough consideration, especially when these measures might invite a system that undermines individual rights. What’s next? - Proposal and Adoption Process: The amendments were proposed and negotiated through the World Health Organization (WHO) processes, in an agreement by the World Health Assembly in May 2024 [World Health Assembly, 2024]. However, the implementation of these amendments is not automatic and requires further steps. - Opt-Out Period: There is a specific window for member states to opt out of these amendments. The U.S. and other countries have until NEXT WEEK, to formally reject the amendments. This opt-out period is crucial because it allows countries to decide whether to be bound by the new regulations.

MJTruthUltra

437,422 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

DIGITAL CURRENCY OR DIGITAL CONTROL Watch Full Episode Here: On Episode 76 of Going Rogue with Lara Logan, Lara sits down with G. Edward Griffin, bestselling author of The Creature from Jekyll Island, the landmark work exposing the origins of the Federal Reserve. Griffin warns about the rapid push toward centralized digital currencies, arguing they may have less to do with convenience and more to do with control. He compares the “everyone must participate” narrative to other global mandates, suggesting that a fully digital system could eliminate any ability to opt out. He explains how programmable digital currencies could shift power away from individuals entirely, where access to money is no longer just about what you have, but whether you comply. Griffin likens it to a points-based system, where behavior could determine your financial freedom. It is a striking perspective on where financial systems may be headed and what that could mean for personal liberty. Over 97% of Americans are not required by law to pay federal income taxes. Visit G. Edward Griffin Going Rogue with Lara Logan #LaraLogan #GEdwardGriffin #DigitalCurrency #CBDC #TruthMatters
1:58

DIGITAL CURRENCY OR DIGITAL CONTROL Watch Full Episode Here: On Episode 76 of Going Rogue with Lara Logan, Lara sits down with G. Edward Griffin, bestselling author of The Creature from Jekyll Island, the landmark work exposing the origins of the Federal Reserve. Griffin warns about the rapid push toward centralized digital currencies, arguing they may have less to do with convenience and more to do with control. He compares the “everyone must participate” narrative to other global mandates, suggesting that a fully digital system could eliminate any ability to opt out. He explains how programmable digital currencies could shift power away from individuals entirely, where access to money is no longer just about what you have, but whether you comply. Griffin likens it to a points-based system, where behavior could determine your financial freedom. It is a striking perspective on where financial systems may be headed and what that could mean for personal liberty. Over 97% of Americans are not required by law to pay federal income taxes. Visit G. Edward Griffin Going Rogue with Lara Logan #LaraLogan #GEdwardGriffin #DigitalCurrency #CBDC #TruthMatters

Lara Logan

26,650 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Diddy tapes are allegedly being shopped around in Hollywood. This is the man who published the book that is allegedly Kim Porters tell all book based on a flash drive he was given by undisclosed sources. To me, it’s looking more and more like this is legit. Every new piece of disclosure only confirms more and more of the speculation being made. He alleges there are multiple videos on that flash drive too and that he will be providing those tapes to the feds. He makes a lot of claims in this interview. Including the spicy tidbit where he implies that there is a Jay Z tape and that he has seen it. Though he tries to neither confirm nor deny. I will be doing a space with The Redheaded libertarian in a few hours to discuss all the facts and go deep into the speculation about what might be going on beneath the surface of Hollywood. Whole interview linked below.
3:04

Diddy tapes are allegedly being shopped around in Hollywood. This is the man who published the book that is allegedly Kim Porters tell all book based on a flash drive he was given by undisclosed sources. To me, it’s looking more and more like this is legit. Every new piece of disclosure only confirms more and more of the speculation being made. He alleges there are multiple videos on that flash drive too and that he will be providing those tapes to the feds. He makes a lot of claims in this interview. Including the spicy tidbit where he implies that there is a Jay Z tape and that he has seen it. Though he tries to neither confirm nor deny. I will be doing a space with The Redheaded libertarian in a few hours to discuss all the facts and go deep into the speculation about what might be going on beneath the surface of Hollywood. Whole interview linked below.

Ian Carroll

1,090,022 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"I've traced the entire history of Epstein's interaction with different developers and compromised networks that he tried to infiltrate with Peter Thiel in 2011 and beyond to try to pull Bitcoin back into the fold." - Simon Dixon "Brock Pierce was Epstein's guy in the digital currency space." "He tried to persuade me that Satoshi Nakamoto was Dr Craig Wright. He ended up being an essential part of creating an alternative version of Bitcoin." "Brock Pierce also was the co-founder of a stablecoin called Tether. Tether was the gateway drug for central bank digital currencies."
4:26

"I've traced the entire history of Epstein's interaction with different developers and compromised networks that he tried to infiltrate with Peter Thiel in 2011 and beyond to try to pull Bitcoin back into the fold." - Simon Dixon "Brock Pierce was Epstein's guy in the digital currency space." "He tried to persuade me that Satoshi Nakamoto was Dr Craig Wright. He ended up being an essential part of creating an alternative version of Bitcoin." "Brock Pierce also was the co-founder of a stablecoin called Tether. Tether was the gateway drug for central bank digital currencies."

TFTC

94,939 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A central banker at the World Economic Forum warns that the privatization of money is an immediate threat to their power. He says currencies issued by U.S. firms are especially dangerous to national monetary sovereignty, and says his solution is the creation of central bank digital currencies to maintain public control. "The first threat is the privatization of money."
0:39

A central banker at the World Economic Forum warns that the privatization of money is an immediate threat to their power. He says currencies issued by U.S. firms are especially dangerous to national monetary sovereignty, and says his solution is the creation of central bank digital currencies to maintain public control. "The first threat is the privatization of money."

Shadow of Ezra

223,656 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The debate over Digital ID is heating up, and Nigel Farage has positioned himself as its most vehement opponent. Drawing direct parallels to the "two-tier society" created by COVID-19 vaccine passports, he issues a stark warning about the future of British liberty. Farage dismantles the core argument for Digital ID—that it will streamline services and control immigration—dismissing these claims as untrustworthy. He counters that the true outcome will be a system of unprecedented state control, envisioning a future where authorities could monitor your finances and even restrict your travel based on arbitrary metrics like "carbon credits." He forces a critical question: Are we ready to trade centuries of established freedom for a digital leash? Citing the failure of ID cards in post-war Britain and the flawed science behind pandemic restrictions, he argues we are on a path to repeat and amplify past mistakes, with our personal data vulnerable to catastrophic abuse. This isn't just about efficiency; it's about the fundamental relationship between the citizen and the state. Farage declares the fight against Digital ID a essential battle for personal freedom, one he is committed to leading in the public square.
2:12

The debate over Digital ID is heating up, and Nigel Farage has positioned himself as its most vehement opponent. Drawing direct parallels to the "two-tier society" created by COVID-19 vaccine passports, he issues a stark warning about the future of British liberty. Farage dismantles the core argument for Digital ID—that it will streamline services and control immigration—dismissing these claims as untrustworthy. He counters that the true outcome will be a system of unprecedented state control, envisioning a future where authorities could monitor your finances and even restrict your travel based on arbitrary metrics like "carbon credits." He forces a critical question: Are we ready to trade centuries of established freedom for a digital leash? Citing the failure of ID cards in post-war Britain and the flawed science behind pandemic restrictions, he argues we are on a path to repeat and amplify past mistakes, with our personal data vulnerable to catastrophic abuse. This isn't just about efficiency; it's about the fundamental relationship between the citizen and the state. Farage declares the fight against Digital ID a essential battle for personal freedom, one he is committed to leading in the public square.

Camus

145,400 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten