Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

As the #WaqfAmendmentAct2025 dominates headlines, revisit our explosive documentary. It uncovers how, under the cloak of religion, vast swathes of India’s land are being quietly seized, told through ground voices, legal experts, and policy analysts. A story too big to ignore. प्रियंक कानूनगो Priyank Kanoongo Vishnu Shankar Jain Shashank...

19,047 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

5 Comments

DRY-CLEAN's profile picture
DRY-CLEAN11 months ago

Waqf , why only it belongs to only muslim? It runs by public tax and in India gov which secular then how muslim dominate this organisation ? I don't know @AshwiniUpadhyay @Vishnu_Jain1 why not able to convince supereme court. Waqf is not a constitutional right of muslim.

Bharat Tales's profile picture
Bharat Tales3 months ago

Why doesn't Hanuman Ji solve all our problems?

J. Balasubramanian 'JB''s profile picture
J. Balasubramanian 'JB'2 months ago

Why the hell Sangam in panvaadis territory? Sangam belongs to Dravidian language..Sangam era in Tamizh!

Arun Sharma's profile picture
Arun Sharma10 months ago

It's sad that property theft is happening in the land of sanatanis. Perhaps religion of waqf should spare land in Middle East by eqaul measure.

Anand G Rao's profile picture
Anand G Rao9 months ago

Whenever M crowd talks of Waqf and Universe, Kayanat belongs to Allah & his followers...then simply quote this 1st Mantra of Ishavasya Upanishad - the whole Universe n all that moves and doesn't move n is enveloped n is occupied by Isha, long b4, at least 2k years before!

Related Videos

Australia’s Future at Risk: Global Creeping Coup Embedded in the Aboriginal Treaty Process A silent, creeping coup is underway. More than 1,000 international treaties have been signed—without the informed consent of the Australian people. Among them is the Sendai Framework, which places Australia’s health policy under the control of foreign actors, as seen in the coordinated COVID lockstep response. These agreements are reshaping our governance—quietly, methodically—placing control in the hands of foreign agents and agendas. Our elected representatives have no say. We have no say. Laws are being dictated externally through a tangle of treaties, policies, and directives designed to entangle us in a global web of control—one that strips Australia of its sovereignty and people of their voice. The manipulation is legal, but not legitimate. This web of control is anchored in Agenda 21, a 300-page plan of comprehensive governance—since rebranded as Agenda 2030. Despite its sweeping implications, Parliament has embedded it into law without proper scrutiny or public mandate. Our Parliament is captured/compromised. Agenda 21 is not just theory—it’s a blueprint to control everything: land, health, environment, resources, and Indigenous affairs. Under the guise of an Aboriginal treaty process, land is being transferred—not to Aboriginal ownership or autonomy—but into communal titles inaccessible to Aboriginal Australians—under the native title con. Which is designed to end private property rights for everyday Australians. It won’t begin with your home—it starts with Crown land. They are not just targeting property. They are targeting custodianship. This is not reconciliation—it’s reallocation, and it’s happening under frameworks like the Aboriginal treaty, disguised as benevolent policy. This is the point of the treaty: it is part of a recolonisation process. As seen—not just in Australia—landmarks are being renamed. Ayers Rock to Uluru, for example. Renaming and restricting access to these places—where people once holidayed freely—is generating social tension. Now, you can’t set foot on them, and it’s framed as being because “the Aboriginal people don’t want you to.” But that is a lie. The true agenda is being hidden in plain sight. Aboriginal people are being used as scapegoats— under the guise of a global Indigenous rights movement. Behind the language of empowerment lies a strategy of exploitation. By using Aboriginal people as the public face of this agenda, resentment is being weaponised. Emotional friction isn’t incidental—it’s deliberately manufactured and inflamed. This isn’t accidental. Operatives have been strategically embedded to infiltrate and neutralise resistance from within, seeding chaos and confusion at every level. A Secret Society of Central Bankers created Aboriginal Affairs to Scapegoat for Land Grabs But pause and ask yourself: how could this be an Aboriginal-led movement when the very architects who established central banking—both globally and in Australia—are behind the Native Title con and the treaty framework? These figures are linked to a Freemasonic network of financial elites, operating through secret societies tied to the leadership of the Bank of England. The Aboriginal treaty agenda was manufactured through international interference—serving neither Aboriginal communities nor the broader Australian public. It is not reconciliation. It is systemic manipulation—an insidious operation cloaked in the language of justice, built on a web of lies designed to control everything. A Long History of Undermining Nations This is not a new tactic. The same forces have long used policy, economic pressure, and manufactured tensions to erode national autonomy—undermining governments from within while presenting international frameworks as benevolent solutions. Behind the façade lies strategic intervention: targeted disruption masquerading as global progress. This pattern is evident in the origins of Aboriginal Affairs in Australia. Those responsible were also complicit in financing the Nazi regime—before war had been declared. Their covert transfer of stolen foreign gold revitalised a defeated Germany, fuelling the rise of a vast military-industrial complex and enabling the blitzkrieg campaign. These same actors inserted operatives into Bolshevik Russia. They carry a well-documented legacy of dismantling sovereign nations from within. And once again, they stand as the architects of Aboriginal Affairs in Australia. And it’s not just Australia. This is part of a global agenda. In Canada, over 40,000 sites are being renamed. The United States and New Zealand are following the same trajectory. It is a coordinated strategy—engineered to fracture unity and provoke division, all under the guise of reconciliation. Indigenous peoples are being used as scapegoats in a broader agenda to claim control over land, identity, and governance. Even the "Welcome to Country" phoney performance—seen across these nations—function as psychological operations. What appears to be inclusion is the bait in a broader trap. Fight together, not each other. READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE:

Josephine Cashman

60,555 views • 1 year ago

🚨 AMERICANS ARE RISING UP - ARE POLITICIANS LISTENING!? MURPHY, TEXAS — CONSTITUTIONAL FIRE: "ISLAM IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC... AN ISLAMIC CENTER IS A BEEHIVE DESIGNED TO SEED A SEPARATE SOCIETY!" A resolute patriot stood before the packed council last night and delivered a razor-sharp constitutional warning against the proposed Islamic expansions: "Preserve, protect and defend the US Constitution... Local American governments must maintain our national and state identities, as well as our secularism. Article Six establishes the Constitution as the supreme law of the land - our political, legal, and social structure all flow from it. Islam is a way of life that is incompatible with our Constitutional Republic. It is a distinct and separate political, legal and social structure. An Islamic center, through my research, is a beehive designed to be a seed for a separate and distinct society. It is a place for study, for family meetings, for supplying a battalion of men, for academic courses, for political and legal training, for sports. It is designed as a social club, as an office for domestic political and legal resolutions, and the Center for distributing their media. Local American governments must maintain our national and state identities as well as our secularism. We as a nation and as a society, do not have to accommodate the Islamic way of life. It is okay to say no. In fact, there are times that we must say no." BOOM. This is constitutional clarity. Article VI supremacy means no parallel systems. No separate societies seeded in our suburbs. No "beehives" for battalion-building, political resolution, or media propagation under the guise of religion. Murphy's fight against these expansions (IAM Masjid phases advancing, parking/traffic burdens, learning center pushes) echoes the Explanatory Memorandum raided by the FBI - proving these centers aren't just houses of worship; they're multifaceted footholds. Texas patriots: We MUST say NO when it threatens our Republic, secularism, and identity. AMERICANS ARE REJECTING THE ISLAMIZATION!

Amy Mek

17,104 views • 7 months ago