Ashley and Andy doing lovey-dovey things, fuck it. Full uncensored version (NSFW) . Credits: nemlei . . . . #hentaivídeo #sex #thecoffinandyandleilei #hentai_ #nsfw #ashleygraves #andygraves #pussy #ass
48,998 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)
0 条评论
暂无评论
原始帖子的评论将显示在这里
相关视频
![— ✧ Soft Ramblefap Listen to the full audio here or over on GWA (link in comment below). [F4M] I want more 🏷 Tags [ramblefap] [why am I so awkward] [begging] [soft moans] [imagine with me] [rain sounds] [overstim] [don't stop] [whimpering] [real orgasm x2] [pussy is a funny word] [I bought my first bottle of lube for you] [slight fourth wall break] [please just fuck me] [I deserve this] 📖 Summary The dating scene is rough. And sometimes you want more than a quick fuck. You want someone to hold. Someone to love. Someone who will love you back. It can get lonely, but at least we have each other. ─── ⋆⁺‧₊ ☾ ₊‧⁺⋆ ─── Hi Dreamers, I made this while testing out some audio equipment upgrades as I ramble and yearn. I don't do ramblefaps often. I always feel a little awkward doing them as opposed to roleplays. But I'm thinking I might do them more—not a lot, but not as opposed to doing them anymore. Just feeling myself as I imagine things I'd want to do with someone. It's just another way to explore what I want, like roleplays, right? Maybe you and I can imagine we're doing all these things with each other. Sweet dreams, Kimari 🌙🥀](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2088427358726541736/amplify_video_thumb/2088425588453408768/img/WvFq0g6CmabG1e1Y.jpg)
25:26
Sensitive content
— ✧ Soft Ramblefap Listen to the full audio here or over on GWA (link in comment below). [F4M] I want more 🏷 Tags [ramblefap] [why am I so awkward] [begging] [soft moans] [imagine with me] [rain sounds] [overstim] [don't stop] [whimpering] [real orgasm x2] [pussy is a funny word] [I bought my first bottle of lube for you] [slight fourth wall break] [please just fuck me] [I deserve this] 📖 Summary The dating scene is rough. And sometimes you want more than a quick fuck. You want someone to hold. Someone to love. Someone who will love you back. It can get lonely, but at least we have each other. ─── ⋆⁺‧₊ ☾ ₊‧⁺⋆ ─── Hi Dreamers, I made this while testing out some audio equipment upgrades as I ramble and yearn. I don't do ramblefaps often. I always feel a little awkward doing them as opposed to roleplays. But I'm thinking I might do them more—not a lot, but not as opposed to doing them anymore. Just feeling myself as I imagine things I'd want to do with someone. It's just another way to explore what I want, like roleplays, right? Maybe you and I can imagine we're doing all these things with each other. Sweet dreams, Kimari 🌙🥀
KimariRoseVA 🌙🥀
61,169 次观看 • 1 个月前
4:30
Sensitive content
🚨NSFW LANGUAGE - This Trooper Curses a LOT Connecticut State Trooper Matthew Spina, May 18, 2020, I-95 Pearl Harbor Memorial Bridge in New Haven. Driver Kevin Jette passed an unmarked car he thought was driving aggressively and flipped it off. It was Spina, who then pulled him over. What followed was a several-minute profanity-laced rant. Spina ordered Jette out, briefly handcuffed him after seeing marijuana (Jette said he had a medical card), searched a bag, stomped an ashtray, and unloaded: “Who the fuck do you think you are worrying about what I’m doing?” “You came to the right guy.” “How the fuck am I gonna catch a speeder if I’m not speeding?” “I’ve got 14 months. I can’t fucking wait to be done.” “Don’t you ever fuck with me again.” No license, registration, or ticket. State police called it “disturbing,” pulled Spina off the road pending IA, and sent him to Employee Assistance Program for mental health counseling. He was already close to retirement. Full context in the video. ❓How much untreated job rage can you carry and still be safe around the public? ❓Why do we only discuss officer mental health after the public already paid the price? ❓How many last-year troopers are one bad stop away from a viral rant?
👮♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™
133,033 次观看 • 9 天前
1:28
Sensitive content
Elon Musk: We'll hopefully demonstrate orbital propellant transfer next year. “One of the other technologies that's key for Mars is doing orbital propellant transfer. So you can think of this like similar to aerial refueling for airplanes, but in this case it's orbital refilling of rockets, which has never been done before. But it is, you know, technically feasible. I always feel like these things are a little NSFW sort of. Listen, you've got to transfer fluid somehow. This has got to be done. The two Starships would get together and one Starship would transfer fuel and oxygen. And actually, most of the mass is oxygen. It's almost 80% oxygen that gets transferred, a little over 20% fuel. So, you send a Starship to orbit with full payload, and then you send a bunch of other Starships up and you would refill the propellant on that Starship. And once the propellant tanks are mostly full, then you can depart for Mars or the Moon. So, this is an important technology which we should hopefully demonstrate next year.” From: SpaceX Update, May 29, 2025
ELON CLIPS
1,381,518 次观看 • 1 年前
![🔊 JADE’s boyfriend (Rizzle Kicks’s Jordan Stephens) defends Harry Styles’s BRITs performance, pushing back at claims that Harry lacks authenticity with the genres he’s exploring: “This is proximity bias, I promise you. [People are] unable to detach themselves from the memory of a young Harry Styles. If Harry had mystery… he doesn't have that in the UK. I live through the same issue with people. He has lived a life that you don't know about. He didn't even do anything [in the public eye] for an entire year. He wasn't even around. You don't know what he did; you’ve got no idea where he was. If no one knew who Harry Styles was and that was the first performance [they saw], why are you questioning whether or not he went to a fucking club? Just listen to the song. Do you know why I loved Harry's performance? I loved Harry’s performance because – and I mean this – when I was away in Canada, I saw JADE perform twice… and I genuinely, in my heart of hearts, don't think there's a better all-round [pop] performer than JADE in the UK. And I'm not even trying to say this as some lovey-dovey bullshit, I swear to fuck I'm not. I mean this as objectively as possible. Not everyone's going to love pop. But Jade does full choreo, full live vocal, she does full stage design… The amount she puts into a live show, you have to – l have to – respect it. I have to go, ‘Whoa, that is incredible.’ When I look at men who are pop-adjacent, it is fucking barren. Just seeing a solo male artist on stage doing any kind of dance routine – while singing, with a dope set, with a choir, and he's doing these little moves… I want that. I need pop-adjacent artists to get it. For me, my journey with music or movement has developed throughout my life. And actually, oddly, my relationship to techno or club or that kind of rhythm – that energy has come out in me since becoming sober. Since I stopped drinking, I actually want to engage with that club culture more, because the music brings me a sense of escape. And I see that in Harry. My point is, I can understand why a person can be taken into a place of connection to that style of music without trying to *be* anything. Dancing isn't owned by anybody. If anyone wants to dance, they can dance.”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2029917398376001637/amplify_video_thumb/2029917070444359680/img/oyMl_MwM1bEJVYmx.jpg)
![Doggy is trending because Nollywood’s Baba Tee said he didn’t have sex with Ijoba Lande’s wife Dara, that it was just ‘small’ Truth or Dare Doggy. [Full Story One Piece] Last week, content creator Lande announced his marriage had ended, because Dara slept with up to 21 nollywood colleagues. And he had evidence. Adding that, some of them are powerful people. And if he mentioned their names, they’ll kll him. Although, he mentioned actor, Babatunde Tayo (Baba Tee). Lande also accused his manager, and Dara’s bestie, Mary Gold for being the facilitator and the pimp behind his wife’s decadence. In reaction, Baba Tee denied, asked for evidence and threatened a defamation lawsuit against Lande. Over the weekend, Mary Gold confessed. She said, she took Dara to Baba Tee’s house. But when they got there. Dara started seducing Baba Tee, then they played a game. Dara herself dared Baba Tee to do sex with her. Charging him to make the game ‘romantic’. Then, Mary Gold said she left them, went to cook. And later slept off, leaving Dara and Baba Tee alone in the living room. Which she regrets doing. She denied claims of pimping Dara to men. Arguing that, Dara herself seduces these men. But most of all, Baba Tee didn’t know Dara was a married woman, talk less of Ijoba Lande’s wife. Following this.. Baba Tee had no other choice than to admit and narrate his own part. He said, Mary lied. That everything happened in the kitchen. And Mary was with them, and they asked her to look away while it happened. That, Mary was even the one daring Dara to do dirty things like twerk, moan, and asking him to spank her hass. But the doggy was brief. And he’s now suspecting they set him up. Because he was shocked how Ijoba found out, when it only happened amidst three of them. And they all did it with clear eyes. After that, they left his place. Now Darasimi’s Version. She’s saying, she was drunk. Hmm.. Anyways. According to her, Mary asked her to follow her to Baba Tee’s place to invite him as an MC for an event. When they got there, Mary initiated the truth or dare. They did the games in the kitchen. Mary participated, she was the one who asked them to make the game “Romantic”, since they were all adults. (Contrary to Mary’s claim) Mary then dared Dara (Lande’s) wife to give Baba Tee doggy. Baba Tee said he won’t pay money again, that they should just do it. So he whipped out a condom, but she refused. Only offered to “sit” on his laps. Which she did.? When they pressed her. She further said. She and Baba Tee didn’t do anything. Because BT didn’t even get an erection. When they pressed her again, reminding her that Baba Tee said they did Doggy but it was brief. Guess what Dara said. “Maybe it happened and I didn’t know, because I was drunk on 10shots”. Now, experienced players are saying they are all lying. And Baba Tee is irresponsible for sleeping with someone’s wife, even though he claims he’s not aware she was married. Also, Lande should do a DNA test on his kids. The summary of it all is, three adults played dirty truth or dare and it got casted. Follow Trending Explained for daily explanations!](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1899128793773539382/amplify_video_thumb/1899128467830059008/img/jmGN7PH_-vg23w1G.jpg)
13:14
Sensitive content
Doggy is trending because Nollywood’s Baba Tee said he didn’t have sex with Ijoba Lande’s wife Dara, that it was just ‘small’ Truth or Dare Doggy. [Full Story One Piece] Last week, content creator Lande announced his marriage had ended, because Dara slept with up to 21 nollywood colleagues. And he had evidence. Adding that, some of them are powerful people. And if he mentioned their names, they’ll kll him. Although, he mentioned actor, Babatunde Tayo (Baba Tee). Lande also accused his manager, and Dara’s bestie, Mary Gold for being the facilitator and the pimp behind his wife’s decadence. In reaction, Baba Tee denied, asked for evidence and threatened a defamation lawsuit against Lande. Over the weekend, Mary Gold confessed. She said, she took Dara to Baba Tee’s house. But when they got there. Dara started seducing Baba Tee, then they played a game. Dara herself dared Baba Tee to do sex with her. Charging him to make the game ‘romantic’. Then, Mary Gold said she left them, went to cook. And later slept off, leaving Dara and Baba Tee alone in the living room. Which she regrets doing. She denied claims of pimping Dara to men. Arguing that, Dara herself seduces these men. But most of all, Baba Tee didn’t know Dara was a married woman, talk less of Ijoba Lande’s wife. Following this.. Baba Tee had no other choice than to admit and narrate his own part. He said, Mary lied. That everything happened in the kitchen. And Mary was with them, and they asked her to look away while it happened. That, Mary was even the one daring Dara to do dirty things like twerk, moan, and asking him to spank her hass. But the doggy was brief. And he’s now suspecting they set him up. Because he was shocked how Ijoba found out, when it only happened amidst three of them. And they all did it with clear eyes. After that, they left his place. Now Darasimi’s Version. She’s saying, she was drunk. Hmm.. Anyways. According to her, Mary asked her to follow her to Baba Tee’s place to invite him as an MC for an event. When they got there, Mary initiated the truth or dare. They did the games in the kitchen. Mary participated, she was the one who asked them to make the game “Romantic”, since they were all adults. (Contrary to Mary’s claim) Mary then dared Dara (Lande’s) wife to give Baba Tee doggy. Baba Tee said he won’t pay money again, that they should just do it. So he whipped out a condom, but she refused. Only offered to “sit” on his laps. Which she did.? When they pressed her. She further said. She and Baba Tee didn’t do anything. Because BT didn’t even get an erection. When they pressed her again, reminding her that Baba Tee said they did Doggy but it was brief. Guess what Dara said. “Maybe it happened and I didn’t know, because I was drunk on 10shots”. Now, experienced players are saying they are all lying. And Baba Tee is irresponsible for sleeping with someone’s wife, even though he claims he’s not aware she was married. Also, Lande should do a DNA test on his kids. The summary of it all is, three adults played dirty truth or dare and it got casted. Follow Trending Explained for daily explanations!
Trending Explained
88,789 次观看 • 1 年前
![The most epic 13 minute AI rant I've heard in 2026 PS: My parent's heard this when I was playing it in the car and thought Jason ✨👾SaaStr.Ai✨ Lemkin went OFF like Stephen A Smith does on first take PPS: Full transcript below [17:00] Harry Stebbings: I I just wanted to ask Jason, if the people that we want are fundamentally different, the developers that we used to hire, we don't because AI writes the code for us. The marketers we don't want, the sales people we don't want—who who do we want genuinely? Like what is the attractive profile? Because your Anthropic’s and your OpenAIs are hiring, so so what are the people that we want in the companies of the future? [17:18] Jason Lemkin: Look, I know it sounds trite, but but the answer is simple. It's just the expression each year changes. We want folks that are genuinely AI fluent. It's pretty simple. Now you know, maybe last year we called them prompt engineers, right? That used to be a job. I don't know if you remember that actually used to be the hottest job on planet earth. Now no one needs a prompt engineer because it's pretty easy to prompt all these tools. That job died. Okay. Um and now we need go-to-market engineers. Um I think that job's going to die. We need—everyone needs so many forward deployed engineers. Like you can't hire enough forward deployed engineers. But uh you know um but Palantir just announced in whatever their their big their big event—they've gotten their deployment times down over 90% with forward deployed engineers. So that may become—so the this wave of disruption for the titles and the specificity, it's also exhaustingly accelerating. But it's really simple. You meet anyone for any role—sales, marketing, engineering, product, QA—they're they're either they're either they can't keep all of the ways they use AI to accelerate their job from spewing out of their mouth, or they're staring at you. It's there's nowhere in the middle. Like, and the person that comes in and says—it's it's it sounds Captain Obvious—but like, you know, you just had the whatever from Lovable, the the marketing head that was super popular on the show, right? She's just spewing AI-native insights into Lovable, right? It's not that complicated. You hire her, Elena, or whatever it is. You just hire her. It doesn't matter whether she's still in college or a junior or a senior or a middler, a left or right. And honestly, if you interview people, I would say of all even of the best startups I've invested in, maybe 30% of the management team meets this standard at best. 30%. Maybe less. And of the interviews I do in general, it's single-digit percents. It's just and in in that sense, it's the same as ever. Like you either lower the bar in hiring or you hire someone that's actually great. And someone that's actually great is so far ahead of you in how to apply to to employ the efficiencies of AI in their role, your jaw falls on the table. The difference is we used to need warm bodies. That's what's changing. We used to need warm bodies to answer the call, to do QA, to do code review, to to get the blue pixel to go from the upper left to the lower right. You laugh, but you need you literally needed to brute force this with humans. With AI, every day that goes by, the AI—you do not need brute force human beings on your team. And that's another reason they're shrinking. Why are all these new companies so efficient? They're just not brute forcing things with humans. They're just not. They're choosing not to. And so these team—all the brute forcers out there—everyone talks about how bloated teams got in 2021. I don't agree with that. I think they got as big as they needed to be when growth was high and you needed humans to do everything. All you look at these teams that that doubled—well if growth continued at 60% like the rate in early 2021 for 5 years or can help me do the math and every single thing a software company did required a human. You were understaffed by your 2021 headcount. You'd be sitting here in 2026. You every office in SoMa would be triple packed and you there wouldn't be enough humans to staff your company. It's just the world changed. [20:33] Harry Stebbings: Jason, you live on the bleeding edge. I think me and Rory see that and I think the world sees that when they hear you every week in terms of how you run SaaS. For all of the CEOs and execs who listen to the show, what would you advise them in terms of determining whether someone is AI fluent when they meet them for jobs, for talent? [20:51] Jason Lemkin: Here's I realized I was just asked this. I just did a review with a super fast startup growing just crossing 100 million and I was asked this question. And one of my favorite executives, I thought his answer was pretty dated and because he gave me an answer that was about 6 months old. The answer 6 months old is: "I look for folks in my team, I look for you know at what tools they play with." Okay, that was a great answer in like summer of 2025. Okay, I tried Lovable last week. Okay, the answer in 2026 is: "What commercial AI tool have you brought into your organization this month?" That's the test. Anyone that is on the bleeding edge that you would want to hire—now there are so many great products in the market. Okay, there is no excuse in any role to have not brought one tool a month into your organization. Okay, there—now there's going to be better and better tools and better and better products as the year goes on. What's the one you did? And you will see folks with their deer in the headlights to this question. What what sales tool? What marketing tool? What product tool? What engineering tool? What did you bring in? Why did you pick it? How does it working? Because if you're at remotely at the cutting edge, you're all over this. You're looking for the next agentic tools that will radically improve how you do business. This is—you think everyone thinks SaaS is at the bleeding edge, right? You know, you know, all we do is we're just looking for the tools and trying them. Okay? Okay, we're one year ahead of everybody else because we did the simplest thing in the world. Like we tried the tools early and we trained them. We trained them for a month. Okay, I'll give you—want hear a horrible example from this week? Super hot AI company valued at 6 billion. Okay, I'm not going to name it. Um, this week yesterday told us we had to quadruple what we spent on their product. Okay, their agent told us, right? And why did this happen? Okay. Well, at this $6 billion company, no one had trained the agent on its pricing properly. No one had tested it. They said, "Well, well, we've been in beta." And we said, "Well, when did the beta launch? A year ago." Okay, these are people asleep at at the wheel. You want somebody who the instant this comes up, they exactly know what the issue is. And "Hey, when I was at Lovable Replit, we trained the agent. This is how we did it. I brought in this tool. I brought in this tool that that Rory invested in last week. It solved all these issues." That's what you want to hear. And if they haven't brought in a tool in the last 30 days, at least deeply evaluated it. I don't really care whether they bought it, but gone so far down the funnel they can tell you—pick whatever tool: Fixie, Regie, GC, AIGC—I don't care how you went through it, you looked at it, you can tell me the eight ways it would improve the productivity of your business and three you didn't. Just don't hire that person because they're going to run your company to the ground. This is the job today. The job today is not to screw around on ChatGPT and to be a prompt engineer. The job today is to bring the best AI and agentic products into your organization and leverage all the hard work that the engineers have done building those products. That's your job. You don't have to screw around. You don't have to be a prompt engineer anymore. You have to be an agent deployment expert. A—this is the new job we're making up today. An Agentic Deployment Expert. That's your job from C-level to junior. Agentic Deployment Expert. Don't hire anybody else. You're going to regret it. They're going to stare at the camera. He's good. Stare at the camera. He's honorable. We could probably just I could slip away, get a coffee, and come back. No. And I I sound exasperated, Rory. And I—but the reason I am is I can just see I can see my best companies doing it. And I can see some companies I've invested in not doing it. And I want to cry. I just want to cry when they have no ADs on their team. I just—like you're flushing your years of your life down the toilet by not approaching your how you're building this company this way. [24:33] Rory: Yes. And at the risk of being positive, it's worth pointing out two things he didn't say. Well, something implicit why he said—Jason didn't do the only hire, you know, he didn't commit the um employment law, I think it's a civil penalty of saying only employ people below X who get the new new thing because he implicitly said anyone can do it provided you're willing to learn. And I think that's the big aha that's one of the positive statements to make here right? Look and I think it applies—I'm always wary of being "Hey, coming across, hey this this is the things that you all have to do." I think it applies to everyone including investors right? I mean I will say I have found that unless you're willing to invest the time learning these tools you actually shouldn't be investing in them. One of my partners Andy had this expression: "You know, if you decide you want to stop learning new things you probably should retire within 6 to 12 months and never write another check again." Maybe that's down to 3 to 6 months at this stage, right? And I think, you know, it's— [25:27] Harry Stebbings: Yeah, I actually I actually had a meeting with mine and Jason's biggest investor the other day and I—pretend he's not here—I said I think he's the most equipped investor for this generation of investing because I don't think anyone quite sits at the bleeding edge like he does on the investor side. [25:42] Harry Stebbings: Why in terms of using the equip stuff? Yeah. Yeah. In terms of using the stuff, understanding understanding bottlenecks, constraints. For sure. [25:51] Jason Lemkin: But can I just add one point? We can just cuz it's so important if it helps people. Okay, we are—and thank you Harry. We're going through these phases. Okay, and when AI started to blow up for real for us, uh call it early 2024, right? Maybe late '23, I wasn't equipped. It was too technical. I wasn't going to go in and figure out—I wasn't smart enough to figure out how to deal with a massively hallucinating LLM API and turn that and turn that into something magical. Kudos to investors and others that that got it in early '23, '22. I mean I remember I—I guess it was maybe SaaStr Annual '23. I was with David Sacks and I did a Q&A and I said, "How you thinking about AI at Craft?" He's like, "Well we're all in. We want 80% of '23 of investments to be AI." I'm like, "Great but like show me the show me the great ones in market." He's like, "They're all prototypes. We're all they're all they're all proof of concepts but we're all in anyway." That's where you kind of had to be in '23 if you weren't investing at like the LLM level. Okay, I wasn't smart enough. Then we went through this weird-ass prompt engineer era where like you you could torture these products to do something good, right? But you had to torture them. You had to like craft these crazy things that made no sense. Now we are in the era where mere ordinarily smart generalists can make these tools do magical things. And literally I go to these meetings and people be like, "I don't know how to like this is so scary. I don't know how to do this." And we show them our backends. Do you know how to do a workflow generator? Do you know how to do a a decision tree? Like we've been building these since software in the '90s. Okay, if you—I can show you all of our agents. The how they work is novel. They do have to be trained. You can't be lazy and have these agents work. But honestly, the the UI, the UX, the way we interact with them, it's just software. And so my point is: Pick yourself off the ground. This is your time now. If you felt lost in AI era, if you felt like you're behind, you don't understand what all these people are saying on X and Twitter and their Claude and and their and talking about all the 4.6 point Nano point and it's over—like you just it's not your world. This is your time. This is your time for the generalist that knows how to use software tools really really well. And I—this is my last point but it's so important. If ever in your recent life—and this is why you could be all you need to be is young at heart to Rory's point—if in the last three to five years you have successfully deployed a piece of enterprise software of any sort you yourself, not some agency you hired, but if you have deployed it, you can deploy any agentic tool. Any. And you can become the hero in your company and you can become the hero in your functional area. But I watch folks—I'm literally helping a company now that they're adding hundreds of sales folks this year with a new pre-IPO COO—he's not hasn't brought in a single tool, totally scared of it. Okay, it's not that hard. Did you use SalesLoft? Did you use Outreach? Did you use HubSpot? Do you know these tools? If you can deploy these tools, you can deploy a world-changing AI agent. And so this is the time for people like the folks that that were shut out of the AI revolution right now. The generalist folks that are not that know how to deploy software that don't even know how to build software. Like vibe coding for me was folks who knew how to build software, but you didn't have to be an engineer. Now, you just need to know how to deploy software to win with AI agents. That's all you need to know. So many people have these skills and they're petrified of AI. "How did you do that? How did you deploy an AI BDR?" Well, we bought a piece of software, we figured out how it worked for a day, we set it up in an afternoon, and then and then we did spend 30 months training it, which you didn't do with this old software because in the old days, we just had to manually upload all the data, right? And there was no training. The the only non-intuitive part is training these things. And it's it's it's just work. So that's why when I see folks on the management team not doing this, there's no excuse. You do not need to be technical to win with AI agents in Q2 of '26. You do not need to be even 1% technical. Not at all. So it's your time. Or you're going to get laid off. Or you're going to get laid off because you're not going to matter.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2036795243681423518/amplify_video_thumb/2036794127560613888/img/52_cdbzzL6_foTSI.jpg)
![🚨❓🛸 Breaking: What the Heck is Going On? 👽❓🚨 Senior White House Officials: We cannot find any copies of the DIA's AAWSAP records. Robert Bigelow: "We have copies of everything [from AAWSAP]." (Please spread this far and wide and tag the appropriate people. Aaron Lukas Stephen Miller Donald J. Trump BigelowPodcast Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies (BICS). Let's get these folks together.) ~ Ainsley Earhardt: "....is releasing new documents that might provide proof of extraterrestrial life, including decades-old, never-before-seen UFO footage." Brian Brian Kilmeade: "Really? We should have led with this." Lawrence Jones: "Right. Peter Doocy joins us live from the White House with this exclusive. Hey, Peter." (Doocy has been kicking ass with his reporting on UAP.) Peter Doocy: "Good morning. I was summoned to an office in the West Wing yesterday for a private briefing about these files that you're about to see on your screen for the first time ever. "Let's show the first clip. It was taken by a Navy aerial photographer. His name was Delbert Newhouse. It was taken along a Utah highway. If you look closely, it looks like a drone swarm, but there were no known drones in the sky when this video was taken in 1952. "I am told they took the first and only copy of this film. They found it in the National Archives. It has been digitized into 4K to be released right here for the first time today." (I watched it today. Film footage from 1952 that's turned into 4K isn't much clearer. But...the Newhouse film clip was first released in 1956, and it was stabilized and posted on YouTube in recent years and that's much better than what was released today. I'm no expert on everything historical in ufology but I'll share something on that 1952 sighting in another post that's MUCH better than what was put out today by our government.) Doocy: "The second clip we have taken by a law enforcement officer's iPhone along a busy Colorado highway three years ago. The officer's narration and some nearby buildings have been redacted. I heard the unredacted version, though, and he is describing multiple orbs hovering over a sensitive military installation for 15 minutes at a time. This one was three years ago. "And then we have a third clip taken by a drone over the Middle East last year. It shows six objects flying in formation, destination unknown. The Pentagon looks at this, they say they do not know what they are looking at on the screen. "And then there's this. There is a newly declassified copy of an expense report, a line-by-line expense report, going through the $22 million dollars that the DIA spent to investigate repeated, years-long claims over something called Skinwalker Ranch. Claims of extra...things in the sky, UFOs, UAPs." (This was AAWSAP and it wasn't focused just on Skinwalker Ranch. Not even close. Read, "Skinwalkers at the Pentagon" by Drs. James Lacatski and Colm Kelleher, and award-winning, investigative journalist, George Knapp, for an inside look at that program. And the three follow-up books, with the last two authored by Lacatski himself). Doocy: "Harry Reid, before he passed away - this was in 2008 - got $22 million dollars to investigate this. Officials now are telling me, senior White House officials are telling me, they cannot find any copy of the records. They've got all the proof that this government contractor was spending $22 million dollars to do this investigation, but when folks high up at the White House who can just pick up the phone and say, 'I need a copy of those records,' make the call, they are being told that if these records were created, they are either lost or something happened to them. "Somebody has them; they are not available to White House officials right now. Which kind of seems like one of these UFO movies where it gets to the Oval Office and the president has to be told that there are certain things that are too classified even for the president." (Those senior White House officials should contact the guy who briefed Trump in the Oval Office in February on UFOs: Robert Bigelow. Bigelow's company, BAASS (Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies), was the contractor for that program.) Here's Bigelow on Episode 2 of The Bigelow Podcast: Bigelow: "BAASS, our organization, we have the 38 papers. We have copies of everything [from AAWSAP]." George Knapp: "The DIRDs." Bigelow: "We have everything. We have all the other papers going up to about approximately 100. So, DIA has those someplace." Knapp: "But they deny it. They say, 'We don't have 'em.'" Bigelow: "Well, I don't know. They could be buried in a frigging trailer or the back of a car somewhere in the trunk and put into a cellar. I don't know where it is, but we have ours, we have copies of everything. (Problem solved. I'm sure those senior White House officials will be on a plane to Las Vegas once they see my tweet. 🙄) Bigelow: "I don't think it's our business to go around the government and divulge ours without sanction of proof, without approval. I mean, without approval. I feel uncomfortable about that. I don't mind the 38 papers (which have been public for years). I think beyond that, I'm uncomfortable by not having some kind of official, ass-covering approval, you know?" (I disagree. The American taxpayers paid for that. Release it all. They then go on the discuss how personal details of people involved would need to be scrubbed if those papers were to ever be made public. No problem with that. But Mr. Bigelow has had a decade and a half to do that. Either way, that should NOT stop Mr. Bigelow from calling his contact at the White House (or vice verse), doubling down, and saying, "I have ALL of the AAWSAP data. Come to Vegas and I'll let you see it all.") Doocy: "But, we should stress, again, officials do not know what the objects are in these videos that are gonna go wide online after this report." Kilmeade: "Now they don't know, Peter, but do you know? Doocy: "[long pause] Can't say." [All laugh. I like the comedy.] Jones: "Well played." Kilmeade: I would check a burn bag in the FBI building. Jones: "Right, exactly." Earhardt: "He used to know, he wiped the record. They just look like white dots to me. I mean, How do we know that's not a drone?" Kilmeade: "Well, it's the 50s." Earhardt: "I know, but they're just like, white dots." (Exactly. Interesting, but it will NOT move the needle with the masses. We have no idea what those white dots represent and they're not making any incredible maneuvers. But it's still coverage of UFOs on a national news show that has a lot of viewers who aren't into UFOs, like us. So, not a bad thing.) Doocy: "Well, the one clip is from a guy in 1952, and so you look at a lot of this stuff now. It's like, oh well, maybe that's a lens flare, maybe it's a hobbyist, maybe it's a weather balloon. But in 1952, there was not a lot of stuff up in the sky. And so, when you look at a video like this, yes, it is old, but it kind of creates a decades-long storyline. We know that these are things that have been a curiosity of humans on Earth for generations, and this is why. And this is a really clear clip that puts into focus - clearer focus, 4K - what some of these guys were...said that they were seeing." (Excellent summary and context by Doocy.) Earhardt: "Were you able to look through the expense report? What are some of the expenses? How'd they spend $22 million dollars?" Kilmeade: "Wow." Earhardt: "And there are no records?" Jones: "Nothing to show for it." Doocy: "I've got it. It's 59 pages long, and some of the stuff is still blocked out. But you know it's got dates. A lot of the stuff is 2008 and 2009. $2.8 million dollars, $3.6 million dollars, $2.1 million dollars. It's a well-respected government contractor (Bigelow's company, BAASS) that was doing this." (I have ChatGPT trying to find this 59-page document and so far it has struck out. We know they had 50 full time investigators over a 27-month period and they all had to be paid. Plus, they had to retrofit buildings in case they received classified UAP-related materials, allegedly from Lockheed, or elsewhere. And, in 2021, I was told the DIRDs cost $15,000 a piece or $570,000 for all 38 studies.) Doocy: "And again, it was Harry Reid out in Nevada who had an interest in UFOs because there are a lot of sightings out there. Harry Reid is the one who got the $22 million dollars of government money appropriated for this." (Kilmeade scoffs. He should know that it was the late Senators Reid (D), Inouye (D) and Stevens (R) who helped fund AAWSAP to the tune of $22 million. This shouldn't be a partisan issue.) Doocy: "Somebody went and investigated, and the files...they just can't find them. Maybe they will turn up at some point, but it is noteworthy that, given all of the interest and all the money that was spent, that somebody from the West Wing of the White House calls and they can't produce the files." Earhardt: "It disappeared." Kilmeade: "Should check [Reid's] estate. Check Harry Reid's closet." Earhardt: "Or someone's bank account (laughs)." (Or make a phone call to Mr. Bigelow. Long-distance calls are free nowadays. To insinuate that Reid pocketed any of that money is ridiculous, and partisan. Also...apparently, Bigelow spent $1 million of his own money to keep the program going towards the end.) Jones: "They think we're all stupid. The only person that knows is the dead senator, right? I mean, come on. Thanks, Peter." Earhardt: "Very interesting. All right, thank you Peter." Kilmeade: "There's an excellent chance they're gonna be friendly." (Based on what?) Earhardt: "Oh, the aliens?" Kilmeade; "And just tell us what they know. Why are they able to move so quick?"](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2101014195387170908/amplify_video_thumb/2101014092253433857/img/9u_HrbbeuMqbGr9M.jpg)