Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Ashlyn Sullivan thinks the Phillies could benefit from a fresh start across the board next season. "When you're looking for a fresh perspective, I don't think going back to the same old song and dance is going to get you where you want to be—especially if you're most likely... show more

SPORTSRADIO 94WIP

258,231 subscribers

24,872 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Ashlyn Sullivan on the Flyers missing out on Leo Carlsson: "The problem here is you're going to go into the season most likely without that 1C, and you're going to go years to come without that 1C."

Ashlyn Sullivan on the Flyers missing out on Leo Carlsson: "The problem here is you're going to go into the season most likely without that 1C, and you're going to go years to come without that 1C."

SPORTSRADIO 94WIP

10,784 views • 2 months ago

Ashlyn Sullivan on the Flyers missing out on Leo Carlsson: "The problem here is you're going to go into the season most likely without that one seed, and you're going to go years to come without that one seed."

Ashlyn Sullivan on the Flyers missing out on Leo Carlsson: "The problem here is you're going to go into the season most likely without that one seed, and you're going to go years to come without that one seed."

SPORTSRADIO 94WIP

31,914 views • 2 months ago

"If they [#Packers] don't have those injuries next year they're going to be, I think, CHAMPIONS of the NFC North and you're going to love the chances they're going to have."

"If they [#Packers] don't have those injuries next year they're going to be, I think, CHAMPIONS of the NFC North and you're going to love the chances they're going to have."

ESPN Milwaukee

15,003 views • 7 months ago

Ashlyn Sullivan on the Phillies: “Pitching is not going to be good enough to win you a world championship and that is the goal of this team.”

Ashlyn Sullivan on the Phillies: “Pitching is not going to be good enough to win you a world championship and that is the goal of this team.”

SPORTSRADIO 94WIP

13,377 views • 3 months ago

Barack Obama in 2009: "This is not going to be a free ride. You're going to pay a significant fine. You're going learn English. You're going to go to the back of the line so you don't go ahead of someone in Mexico City who's applying legally."

Barack Obama in 2009: "This is not going to be a free ride. You're going to pay a significant fine. You're going learn English. You're going to go to the back of the line so you don't go ahead of someone in Mexico City who's applying legally."

Defiant L’s

4,277,188 views • 1 year ago

Nick Saban is famous for The Process. But if you don't know where you're going, you don't know what process will get you there. So the most important part of The Process is having a VISION for where you want to go.

Nick Saban is famous for The Process. But if you don't know where you're going, you don't know what process will get you there. So the most important part of The Process is having a VISION for where you want to go.

Thad Wells

28,272 views • 9 months ago

Tom Brady says he deliberately pushed teammates until they broke to find out who he could actually trust "I want to push them to the point where they're really uncomfortable, because believe me, the opponents are going to push you till you're uncomfortable" "If you're going to break in practice, you're going to break in the game. If you're going to break against me and my voice yelling at you, you're going to break when there's 70,000 fans screaming at you" "I want to pressure test you early. If you break, I don't need you anyway" "I need to figure out if it's in you. If it's in you, let's go. You're my team. Let's ride. If you're not, get out I don't need you"

Tom Brady says he deliberately pushed teammates until they broke to find out who he could actually trust "I want to push them to the point where they're really uncomfortable, because believe me, the opponents are going to push you till you're uncomfortable" "If you're going to break in practice, you're going to break in the game. If you're going to break against me and my voice yelling at you, you're going to break when there's 70,000 fans screaming at you" "I want to pressure test you early. If you break, I don't need you anyway" "I need to figure out if it's in you. If it's in you, let's go. You're my team. Let's ride. If you're not, get out I don't need you"

Arslan

187,585 views • 2 months ago

Nothing good is going to come from your life if you don't dedicate yourself. You're going to want to quit, you're going to doubt it's possible and if you want it you're going to just need to do it anyway. So, do you want to reach your goals or not?

Nothing good is going to come from your life if you don't dedicate yourself. You're going to want to quit, you're going to doubt it's possible and if you want it you're going to just need to do it anyway. So, do you want to reach your goals or not?

Andrew Tate

311,685 views • 2 years ago

Mark Zuckerberg, founder, chairman and CEO of Meta, on how he actually runs the company: "I basically don't believe in delegation." He starts by naming the assumption he's rejecting. "I think that there's sort of this theory that a lot of people have, which is like, all right, the job of a leader is you hire people and you delegate things to them." Zuckerberg doesn't operate that way. He's also clear that he can't personally handle everything: "My theory is there's so much going on across the company that I can't possibly get involved in all of it. So all these people are going to have a ton of stuff that they're going to do. But fundamentally, if there is a decision that I want to be involved with, I'm going to be involved in it." The distinction carries the whole argument. He reserves the right to review any call, and no layer of the org chart gets to tell him something is beneath him or outside his lane. His reasoning comes back to accountability: "I think that's generally a good way for founders to operate. If you're running the company and you're on the hook for everything and there's something that's important at whatever level of detail in the organization, I don't get the logic of saying 'I'm not going to be involved in that.'" That's the load-bearing line. If you're answerable for the output, opting out of the input makes no sense. Mark Zuckerberg does attach one condition, and it's a real one rather than a throwaway: "You want to have humility and know that if you're diving into some decision, you may not have the most context immediately." Diving in means showing up without pretending you already have the answer. The expectation extends across the whole company: "I generally think that you want to be able to just have the cultural expectation that things are not going to be so hierarchical and you're just going to dive into whatever you want."

Mark Zuckerberg, founder, chairman and CEO of Meta, on how he actually runs the company: "I basically don't believe in delegation." He starts by naming the assumption he's rejecting. "I think that there's sort of this theory that a lot of people have, which is like, all right, the job of a leader is you hire people and you delegate things to them." Zuckerberg doesn't operate that way. He's also clear that he can't personally handle everything: "My theory is there's so much going on across the company that I can't possibly get involved in all of it. So all these people are going to have a ton of stuff that they're going to do. But fundamentally, if there is a decision that I want to be involved with, I'm going to be involved in it." The distinction carries the whole argument. He reserves the right to review any call, and no layer of the org chart gets to tell him something is beneath him or outside his lane. His reasoning comes back to accountability: "I think that's generally a good way for founders to operate. If you're running the company and you're on the hook for everything and there's something that's important at whatever level of detail in the organization, I don't get the logic of saying 'I'm not going to be involved in that.'" That's the load-bearing line. If you're answerable for the output, opting out of the input makes no sense. Mark Zuckerberg does attach one condition, and it's a real one rather than a throwaway: "You want to have humility and know that if you're diving into some decision, you may not have the most context immediately." Diving in means showing up without pretending you already have the answer. The expectation extends across the whole company: "I generally think that you want to be able to just have the cultural expectation that things are not going to be so hierarchical and you're just going to dive into whatever you want."

Big Brain Business

45,196 views • 26 days ago

Arteta: “You want to be part of the noise or not? If not then go to do something else, be part of another different club. You want to be Arsenal and everybody's been demanding for 10 years, 15 years. We need to go back there. Now we are there and now what? “You don't want noise. Noise is part and the bullets are part of that. Try to deal with them in the right way and achieve what you are looking for.” On Man City having the Premier League title in their hands: “We have to do what we have to do, and nothing is going to change for anybody at the end. You're going to have to win the next match and if you do that, you're going to be in a much stronger position. That's the only thing.”

Arteta: “You want to be part of the noise or not? If not then go to do something else, be part of another different club. You want to be Arsenal and everybody's been demanding for 10 years, 15 years. We need to go back there. Now we are there and now what? “You don't want noise. Noise is part and the bullets are part of that. Try to deal with them in the right way and achieve what you are looking for.” On Man City having the Premier League title in their hands: “We have to do what we have to do, and nothing is going to change for anybody at the end. You're going to have to win the next match and if you do that, you're going to be in a much stronger position. That's the only thing.”

Connor Humm

103,333 views • 7 months ago

Catherine Austin Fitts: "The problem isn't that [our] currency is fiat...[and] you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold...the central bankers have accumulated all [of it]. [And] now...you're [saying] we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind?" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Jerm Warfare posted to the UK Column News (UK Column) YouTube channel on January 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The thing that makes the current system what they would call slavery is debt-basing and secrecy, okay? And the failure of their elected representatives to obey the law. "So you have lawlessness, you have debt basing and you have secrecy, okay? The problem is not that the currency is fiat, because what I will tell you is if you go back through history, if you read Alexander Del Mar, the most effective currencies in the world are fiat currencies that are well governed. "We have a debt-based fiat currency that is not well governed in my opinion. But it could be. Now, remember, there has been almost no support in the general population for managing it responsibly. Everybody was like, no, don't manage it responsibly, get me my check. And if that means you're irresponsible, that's okay, I want my check. "But you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold and silver. You're going to make it much worse. Because while we've done this sort of hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil, for 30 years the central bankers have accumulated all the gold. So now that they have all the gold, you're going to tell me we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind? "Because now they've got the gold and if you start a gold transaction system now you need gold from them and they've got you over a barrel, right? And what are you going to do to get gold? You're going to have to sell your land, you're going to have to sell your kids, you're going to have to sell real assets to get their gold, right? Why would you do that? "Why would you create— You know, you're dependent on your enemy now you're going to increase your dependency on your enemy now. You're out of your mind, okay? That's not a sound money system. Especially because they want to make it digital. And so they're going to have fiat gold, which is even— I mean, if you think fiat is bad, wait til you see fiat gold when they own all the gold. "So you know, what we want is we want a fiat system and we want it with lawful and no secrecy or minimal secrecy. You're going to have to have some secrecy and a good governance system. Can we get there? Of course we can get there, but we can't get there if you have an entire population that is absolutely committed to corrupt short-term behavior."

Catherine Austin Fitts: "The problem isn't that [our] currency is fiat...[and] you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold...the central bankers have accumulated all [of it]. [And] now...you're [saying] we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind?" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Jerm Warfare posted to the UK Column News (UK Column) YouTube channel on January 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The thing that makes the current system what they would call slavery is debt-basing and secrecy, okay? And the failure of their elected representatives to obey the law. "So you have lawlessness, you have debt basing and you have secrecy, okay? The problem is not that the currency is fiat, because what I will tell you is if you go back through history, if you read Alexander Del Mar, the most effective currencies in the world are fiat currencies that are well governed. "We have a debt-based fiat currency that is not well governed in my opinion. But it could be. Now, remember, there has been almost no support in the general population for managing it responsibly. Everybody was like, no, don't manage it responsibly, get me my check. And if that means you're irresponsible, that's okay, I want my check. "But you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold and silver. You're going to make it much worse. Because while we've done this sort of hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil, for 30 years the central bankers have accumulated all the gold. So now that they have all the gold, you're going to tell me we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind? "Because now they've got the gold and if you start a gold transaction system now you need gold from them and they've got you over a barrel, right? And what are you going to do to get gold? You're going to have to sell your land, you're going to have to sell your kids, you're going to have to sell real assets to get their gold, right? Why would you do that? "Why would you create— You know, you're dependent on your enemy now you're going to increase your dependency on your enemy now. You're out of your mind, okay? That's not a sound money system. Especially because they want to make it digital. And so they're going to have fiat gold, which is even— I mean, if you think fiat is bad, wait til you see fiat gold when they own all the gold. "So you know, what we want is we want a fiat system and we want it with lawful and no secrecy or minimal secrecy. You're going to have to have some secrecy and a good governance system. Can we get there? Of course we can get there, but we can't get there if you have an entire population that is absolutely committed to corrupt short-term behavior."

Sense Receptor

36,952 views • 7 months ago

“The delivery of it (the song) is going to be a lot more heartfelt when you finally step up to the microphone and think ‘Right I know what this song is about’... That’s going to come across inevitably.” Noel on ‘If I Had A Gun’.

“The delivery of it (the song) is going to be a lot more heartfelt when you finally step up to the microphone and think ‘Right I know what this song is about’... That’s going to come across inevitably.” Noel on ‘If I Had A Gun’.

Noel Gallagher

134,203 views • 2 years ago

Jordan Peterson: "If you're competent and silent you will be ignored." "You might think well people should reward you because you're competent. And yes of course they should. But if you're competent and silent then you're just part of the background that's keeping everything functioning" On why you cannot negotiate from a position of weakness: "If you want to push your career forward you have to push it forward. You have to be competent and you have to be strategic" "To be strategic when you negotiate for a new position or a new salary you have to be able to say if you don't give me what I want then something you don't like will happen to you" "It's not a physical threat. It's that you have an option" "You have your CV in order. You're educated and competent and desirable to people outside of your immediate job. You're willing to instantly put yourself on the job market" "So that when you go talk to the person you're negotiating with you're credible" On the one thing most people completely miss about negotiation: "It's very seldom that you're talking to the person who's at the top of the pecking order. What you need to do is tell them a story that they can tell to their boss to make you not a problem" "A good story is look we really need this person because they're hyper competent and they have a better offer" "If you go in there with no power you're going to lose. Obviously" He concludes with the one thing every competent person needs to hear: "The first thing you need to know if you're going to negotiate is that you have to be able to say no. And what no means is that you're not going to do it"

Jordan Peterson: "If you're competent and silent you will be ignored." "You might think well people should reward you because you're competent. And yes of course they should. But if you're competent and silent then you're just part of the background that's keeping everything functioning" On why you cannot negotiate from a position of weakness: "If you want to push your career forward you have to push it forward. You have to be competent and you have to be strategic" "To be strategic when you negotiate for a new position or a new salary you have to be able to say if you don't give me what I want then something you don't like will happen to you" "It's not a physical threat. It's that you have an option" "You have your CV in order. You're educated and competent and desirable to people outside of your immediate job. You're willing to instantly put yourself on the job market" "So that when you go talk to the person you're negotiating with you're credible" On the one thing most people completely miss about negotiation: "It's very seldom that you're talking to the person who's at the top of the pecking order. What you need to do is tell them a story that they can tell to their boss to make you not a problem" "A good story is look we really need this person because they're hyper competent and they have a better offer" "If you go in there with no power you're going to lose. Obviously" He concludes with the one thing every competent person needs to hear: "The first thing you need to know if you're going to negotiate is that you have to be able to say no. And what no means is that you're not going to do it"

Brad

35,334 views • 1 month ago

"If you love football, you're going to want to be here." John Harbaugh is looking for a group of players that love the game 🏈

"If you love football, you're going to want to be here." John Harbaugh is looking for a group of players that love the game 🏈

NFL

201,608 views • 8 months ago