正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Asmongold on his silver lining with gambling "I never gamble..would never recommend ppl to gamble..we take gambling sponsors..it's a weird situation where I have to really appreciate gambling in a unique way..bc gambling stands up for free speech..gambling is willing to sponsor Nick Shirley..somebody like me..if it wasn't for...

72,882 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

33 条评论

TECTONE 🇺🇸 的头像
TECTONE 🇺🇸2 个月前

This is the correct take

steeltownUSA 的头像
steeltownUSA2 个月前

Gambling doesn't care about what you say. They want you on their website losing money. It's not some virtuous act and Zack know it.

Chinston's WorstShill 的头像
Chinston's WorstShill2 个月前

LMAO! Yeah, of course, this is the same reason I love the RUSSIANS. Because they sponsor me, which is how you know they stand for free speech. Free speech is when you pay me lol It makes so much sense when you don't think about it. Please don't think about it lol.

Mayo Monster 的头像
Mayo Monster2 个月前

I wouldnt say its free speech, but you should be allowed to spend your money how you want

FinelineTV 的头像
FinelineTV2 个月前

If you haven't noticed Asmongold is working with the Mafia to subvert and destroy America from within Then you haven't been paying attention to what Asmongold has been saying. And how evil it really is. Nick Shirley, really? Hasn't even reported the Cuomo 'Buffalo Billion' yet

Asho! 👁️🐦‍🔥 的头像
Asho! 👁️🐦‍🔥2 个月前

This guy is not smart. Lmao then again smarts is not a prerequisite for American irl streaming just groypers.

overitjoker 的头像
overitjoker2 个月前

What does it say when gambling is the only thing willing to sponsor you

Chinston's WorstShill 的头像
Chinston's WorstShill2 个月前

Is there somebody he WOULDN'T take money from lol? Is there any source too tainted? This is why I say he treats his country the same way he treats his house: If he gets to make money by neglecting his viewers, he will gladly expose them to gambling ads. Because why effort?

RippingOne 的头像
RippingOne2 个月前

As a non-gambler I find it difficult to take a hard stance against gambling when I see so many people that do have favorite sports teams and cheer on shit like the World Cup. The criticisms ring hollow. Pro sports are so much worse than the streamer drama.

Gombar Csaba 的头像
Gombar Csaba2 个月前

Jesus Christ, what a cope. What he is doing is terrible. But he did say he would do anything if it benefits him.

RedFaster 的头像
RedFaster2 个月前

Most of what we do for entertainment is basically the same thing as gambling except there is no chance that you will ever get a penny out of it.

The Doc Demand Show 👨🏾‍🦽👨🏾‍🍳 的头像
The Doc Demand Show 👨🏾‍🦽👨🏾‍🍳2 个月前

There's nothing wrong with gambling $100,000 of my own earnings! It's my $75,000 and I can do as I like! Why would you even care what I do with my own $50,000? It's like you have nothing better to do than concern ourself with my $25,000! Get a life!

Eto 的头像
Eto2 个月前

"i don't gamble because it's a toxic waste of money that's preys on human emotions but I'll take their money and promote it because who cares what happens to people" If your gonna promote it, just own up to it 😂

Katana 的头像
Katana2 个月前

Can we just bring back honesty? If you receive payment from gambling sponsors, just go all-in (no pun intended) and say you don’t mind if people gambles. Because thats literally what your deal says Fuck off with this pussy rationalization behaviour

boochie boy 的头像
boochie boy2 个月前

Because someone dense enough to pour their paycheck into gambling and thinking they ever turn a profit is someone dense enough to watch content from an unbathed attic dweller 🤷🏻‍♂️

Big Dumbo 的头像
Big Dumbo2 个月前

Say what you want about Asmon with this but at least he’s been upfront about how he feels about this and honestly not that big of a deal

Lyon Kingslayer 🇲🇽🇺🇸 的头像
Lyon Kingslayer 🇲🇽🇺🇸2 个月前

If you’re an adult and can’t be responsible for your actions by gambling then that’s a you problem. I have no problem with gambling, but I generally don’t do it because it’s not my thing. But I do gamble in poker with friends for fun once in a while.

Godam Juice 的头像
Godam Juice2 个月前

Did the roach king just call himself a journalist??? 😂😂😂

Biggles 的头像
Biggles2 个月前

Also without gambling we wouldnt have as many homeless people, broken families, suicides, domestic violence cases etc etc

Martin Neumann 的头像
Martin Neumann2 个月前

that is why leftist are against it

inuwu 的头像
inuwu2 个月前

"i never smoke crack... would never recommend ppl to snort coke.. we take cartel sponsors.. its a weird situation where i appreciate the fentanyl in a unique way. .. cuz drugs stands for free speech"

CBtheG 的头像
CBtheG2 个月前

It's heart breaking to watch someone you care about be addicted to gambling.

N R D 的头像
N R D2 个月前

This is the biggest shame about crypto - we were right there - so much capital was flowing into projects - but instead of anything meaningful, we got rugged by SBF and jpegs of monkeys

Rasmus 的头像
Rasmus2 个月前

Stupid people will gamble away their money regardless of who is promoting it.

Johann Hahn 的头像
Johann Hahn2 个月前

"I have to respect gambling, because they are the only sponsors willing to pay scumbags like me"

Kurufal 的头像
Kurufal2 个月前

Autonomy of self is paramount to all. If you don't have autonomy you are a slave.

Sick and Tired of being sick and tired. 的头像
Sick and Tired of being sick and tired.2 个月前

Lol simping for gambling sorry bro that's fucked bad take

Tom Kennedy 🇺🇸 的头像
Tom Kennedy 🇺🇸2 个月前

Everything in moderation.

Jonathan Jung 的头像
Jonathan Jung2 个月前

Gacha games are all about gambling. Loot boxes are all about gambling. So we all have partaked in some sort of gambling in our lives. Not religiously like folks who truly gamble, but still.

dehcirt 的头像
dehcirt2 个月前

I rather have less freedom of speech and no gambling, sorry asmon.

ear 的头像
ear2 个月前

It's not surprising that asmon finds himself of the wrong side of every position all of the time.

Regis Philbin 的头像
Regis Philbin2 个月前

How is sponsoring Nick Shirley a support of free speech the guy gets promoted by our vice president he is not being silenced anywhere lmao

Alex R. Wagner 🇺🇸 的头像
Alex R. Wagner 🇺🇸2 个月前

Uno-Reversed Scientology 🔄

相关视频

Ex-Quant Trader (Finn Hulse) introduces Gambling 2.0: A new ecosystem primitive where your bets are against every other player In this episode, Finn introduces the Gambling 2.0 Initiative (Gambling 2.0 Initiative) and breaks down how replacing the house’s bankroll with a huge player pool inverts predatory incentives and democratizes positive EV, effectively creating a “variance exchange” at the core of all games of chance. Gambling 2.0 is a self-custodial, permissionless, and unfuckwithable system for provably fair gambling where the “house” always wants its players to win. We discuss - How to create a permissionless, fair gambling system that doesn’t exploit its own users - The predatory incentives, practices, and misalignment at the core of “Gambling 1.0” - How gambling can be understood as a “good” thing at a social level - The rise of chronic youth gambling and escaping the permanent underclass - How Gambling 2.0 removes the house and re-aligns incentives in favor of users - How Variance Vault acts as a HIP-3/Shopify layer for building fair gambling at scale - The mechanics of limiting user downside while maintaining high variance upside - Why Finn is pitching Gambling 2.0 to governments first - Powerball/Jackpot style lotteries are an existing primitive version of Gambling 2.0 - Is this practically possible? What does the onboarding process look like with existing infra? - The challenge of provable fairness & randomness - What it looks like to build and deploy Gambling 2.0 at scale Timestamps 0:00 Freeroll & Gambling 2.0 04:30 Predatory gambling mechanics 09:00 Gambling: declining with boomers, increasing with youth 11:30 Labor and capital 12:50 Clavicular, influencers & deceptive (probably illegal) advertising 13:46 The 3 Tenets of Gambling 2.0 19:41 Variance Vault: democratizing upside 23:07 Provably fair house mechanics 27:40 Randomness & decentralization 29:17 The HIP-3/Shopify of gambling 36:52 GTM strategy for Freeroll 40:20 Pitching Freeroll to governments 42:17 Shutdown Las Vegas, rewire into Gambling 2.0 46:00 How to create a fair high variance reward system 51:30 A permissionless gambling layer 53:50 Removing predatory inefficiency from markets 58:10 Self-funding variance 1:02:05 Deploy a game on Freeroll

NGMI

14,878 次观看 • 1 个月前

Gambling companies are finding loopholes to entice vulnerable people back onto their platform - even when people have decided they want to stop gambling and self excluded on BetStop. This is what happens when you leave gaps that can be exploited by what is known to be a predatory industry. And it shows what will happen if the Government opts for a partial ban on gambling ads, rather than a full ban. The late Labor MP Peta Murphy and her committee report gave us the blueprint for change, it's time for the government to implement the Murphy Report recommendations in full. If you want to read more, this is from Peta Murphy's Foreword to the committee report: "Online gambling companies advertise so much in Australia because it works. Online gambling has been deliberately and strategically marketed alongside sport, which has normalised it as a fun, harmless, and sociable activity that is part of a favourite pastime. Gambling advertising is grooming children and young people to gamble and encourages riskier behaviour. The torrent of advertising is inescapable. It is manipulating an impressionable and vulnerable audience to gamble online. Australia’s largest professional sporting codes and broadcast media were largely in lockstep with their advertising and sponsorship partners in the gambling industry during this inquiry to oppose further restrictions. The Committee shares the concerns of many witnesses and the community that the status quo is leading to a generation of young Australians who view gambling and sport as inextricably linked. This is concerning, not only because of the potential increase in Australians experiencing gambling harm, but also about changes to the culture of sport. Australia would be diminished if sport was to be so captured by gambling revenue that providing an opportunity for betting came to be seen as its primary purpose. A phased, comprehensive ban on all gambling advertising on all media – broadcast and online, that leaves no room for circumvention, is needed. Partial bans on gambling advertising do not work. The 2017 media reforms resulted in gambling advertising on television increasing. Harmful industries have shown they will identify and capitalise on any gaps in marketing restrictions and that they are taking advantage of the less regulated online environment. The advertising ban should be enforced sequentially, with advertising that has the highest risk of harm to be addressed immediately. To enable sporting bodies and broadcasters adequate time to locate alternative sources of advertising revenue and to comply with current contractual obligations, the Committee recommends that the comprehensive ban be phased in over a three-year period."

David Pocock

47,178 次观看 • 11 个月前