Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Asmongold thinks social media should be read-only for those under 18, would support 3rd party ID verification “No problem with kids going on the internet..but to make an account and allow yourself to receive & send messages from individuals..that’s diff”

Awk20000's profile picture

yeet

145,787 subscribers

166,735 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Gaming
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Julie Inman-Grant answers questions from Australian teenagers about the upcoming under 16 social media ban. She says it's not a ban, it's a delay. Inman-Grant sounds like she thinks she should be the parent of these kids along with the government. At what stage is this just going to far and wouldn't it be better to support parents to make these decisions?
5:52

Julie Inman-Grant answers questions from Australian teenagers about the upcoming under 16 social media ban. She says it's not a ban, it's a delay. Inman-Grant sounds like she thinks she should be the parent of these kids along with the government. At what stage is this just going to far and wouldn't it be better to support parents to make these decisions?

Francynancy

10,178 views • 10 months ago

Asmongold announces he is going to sue The16thUSPrez for defamation (who yeeted his entire account). - Legal Mindset lays out the case, thinks he should do it. - Asmongold says he would be a hypocrite if he didn't. - Says deleting his account and post is against the law. - He might sue multiple people. - Wants to win, be effective, and set an example.
4:36

Asmongold announces he is going to sue The16thUSPrez for defamation (who yeeted his entire account). - Legal Mindset lays out the case, thinks he should do it. - Asmongold says he would be a hypocrite if he didn't. - Says deleting his account and post is against the law. - He might sue multiple people. - Wants to win, be effective, and set an example.

Grummz

225,119 views • 7 months ago

Our kids come first. Social media directly impacts mental health, and I am proud to stand with John Fetterman on an issue we are dealing with not only in our own households, but that parents across America are dealing with too. It is time we bring to light the harm social media can do to our kids, and offer support to those who need it most.
1:29

Our kids come first. Social media directly impacts mental health, and I am proud to stand with John Fetterman on an issue we are dealing with not only in our own households, but that parents across America are dealing with too. It is time we bring to light the harm social media can do to our kids, and offer support to those who need it most.

Katie Britt

12,896 views • 1 year ago

Nigel Farage describes Keir Starmer's under-16 social media ban as an attempt to impose digital ID via the back door. He maintains that the British public should not sacrifice freedoms for a surveillance state that arrests 12,000 people for social media posts annually. "We're all going to have to prove our age... This would mean full facial recognition and going on to a digital register, and I fear that it is digital ID via the back door."
1:48

Nigel Farage describes Keir Starmer's under-16 social media ban as an attempt to impose digital ID via the back door. He maintains that the British public should not sacrifice freedoms for a surveillance state that arrests 12,000 people for social media posts annually. "We're all going to have to prove our age... This would mean full facial recognition and going on to a digital register, and I fear that it is digital ID via the back door."

Wide Awake Media

20,795 views • 2 months ago

'We won't allow a 13 year old to go and see an 18-rated film in the cinema, so it makes no sense for that same 13 year old to be exposed to really harmful content online' David Austin from the British Board of Film Classification told #BBCBreakfast social media companies should carry age classification warnings, as a Government consultation on use for under-16s comes to an end
1:02

'We won't allow a 13 year old to go and see an 18-rated film in the cinema, so it makes no sense for that same 13 year old to be exposed to really harmful content online' David Austin from the British Board of Film Classification told #BBCBreakfast social media companies should carry age classification warnings, as a Government consultation on use for under-16s comes to an end

BBC Breakfast

33,863 views • 3 months ago

No one under 16 (or 18) should be on social media. Irony: churches can’t promote this same policy because of the youth ministry industry. You can’t have accounts to “reach teens” while saying teens should not be on those same accounts for their own safety.
0:58

No one under 16 (or 18) should be on social media. Irony: churches can’t promote this same policy because of the youth ministry industry. You can’t have accounts to “reach teens” while saying teens should not be on those same accounts for their own safety.

Anthony Bradley

10,945 views • 7 months ago

New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said on Monday (August 24) his party will introduce a bill in Parliament that seeks to ban children under 16 from using social media. The bill would require social media platforms to take reasonable steps to verify users' ages, including by utilising existing account information, facial technology and digital identity documents. It was not immediately clear if the bill would garner sufficient support to pass through Parliament, with one of Luxon's coalition partners, the New Zealand First party, saying it would not support it. 📹Reuters
1:28

New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said on Monday (August 24) his party will introduce a bill in Parliament that seeks to ban children under 16 from using social media. The bill would require social media platforms to take reasonable steps to verify users' ages, including by utilising existing account information, facial technology and digital identity documents. It was not immediately clear if the bill would garner sufficient support to pass through Parliament, with one of Luxon's coalition partners, the New Zealand First party, saying it would not support it. 📹Reuters

The Hindu

10,345 views • 4 days ago

In what can only be described as a dark & sinister operation, breaking news every parent should know Australia’s eSafety Commission was given powers to block kids from social media with HUMAN friends, but remains entirely silent on PrON and Ai tech which threatens our kids. Why?
7:14

In what can only be described as a dark & sinister operation, breaking news every parent should know Australia’s eSafety Commission was given powers to block kids from social media with HUMAN friends, but remains entirely silent on PrON and Ai tech which threatens our kids. Why?

Aus Integrity

24,934 views • 1 year ago

⚠️This is a warning A social media ban for under-16s would have drastic consequences - including digital ID checks for all Parliament should focus on supporting parents and schools to help children use the internet in a positive and healthy way, instead of pushing for a ban
0:59

⚠️This is a warning A social media ban for under-16s would have drastic consequences - including digital ID checks for all Parliament should focus on supporting parents and schools to help children use the internet in a positive and healthy way, instead of pushing for a ban

Big Brother Watch

35,020 views • 5 months ago

This is getting really CREEPY Over 14 countries, France, The UK, Australia, the UAE etc, Have all introduced, within a few months of eachother, a carbon copy of the social media ban for those under 16. All of them require id verification in order to prove your age. It doesn’t make sense that so many independent jurisdiction would emulate legislation and that, so quickly. This isn’t organic. This isn’t electorate driven. This is not how sovereign nations work. At this point, there is no coincidence what so ever. It can only be explain by some form of coordinated effort. Which begs the question… by WHO? The why however is simple. Traditional media, is dwindling. GenZ gets their news from Social media. Millennials, a mix of digital sources like social media and podcasts. Anonymity also has to be crushed (hence ID verification) The ideological capture must continue and losing grip on the narrative cannot be allowed. This is painfully obvious. The internet was supposed to democratise information. But its very quickly being turned into a MASSIVE psyop.
1:22

This is getting really CREEPY Over 14 countries, France, The UK, Australia, the UAE etc, Have all introduced, within a few months of eachother, a carbon copy of the social media ban for those under 16. All of them require id verification in order to prove your age. It doesn’t make sense that so many independent jurisdiction would emulate legislation and that, so quickly. This isn’t organic. This isn’t electorate driven. This is not how sovereign nations work. At this point, there is no coincidence what so ever. It can only be explain by some form of coordinated effort. Which begs the question… by WHO? The why however is simple. Traditional media, is dwindling. GenZ gets their news from Social media. Millennials, a mix of digital sources like social media and podcasts. Anonymity also has to be crushed (hence ID verification) The ideological capture must continue and losing grip on the narrative cannot be allowed. This is painfully obvious. The internet was supposed to democratise information. But its very quickly being turned into a MASSIVE psyop.

Elliot Daigneault

125,698 views • 2 months ago

🇪🇺🚨‼️ The EU plans to introduce mandatory age verification for social media. The stated goal is to protect children, but let’s see how such laws and regulations usually evolve. For example, income tax: introduced to tax the top 1% in 1913. 113 years later, everyone is taxed heavily on everything. So what will age verification lead to? Soon crimes will be added to social media access denials, then an Internet “driver’s license” will be introduced and revoked for hate speech and so on. It’s done step by step, never all at once.
1:51

🇪🇺🚨‼️ The EU plans to introduce mandatory age verification for social media. The stated goal is to protect children, but let’s see how such laws and regulations usually evolve. For example, income tax: introduced to tax the top 1% in 1913. 113 years later, everyone is taxed heavily on everything. So what will age verification lead to? Soon crimes will be added to social media access denials, then an Internet “driver’s license” will be introduced and revoked for hate speech and so on. It’s done step by step, never all at once.

Lord Bebo

38,540 views • 1 month ago

Laura Loomer calls for the United States government to force social media companies to censor accounts who disagree with her on politics. Loomer wants Iranian media that makes LEGO videos banned from the internet, along with Russian news outlets. "They need to make sure they send letters to all the social media companies and force compliance." "They need to start enforcing the law."
0:38

Laura Loomer calls for the United States government to force social media companies to censor accounts who disagree with her on politics. Loomer wants Iranian media that makes LEGO videos banned from the internet, along with Russian news outlets. "They need to make sure they send letters to all the social media companies and force compliance." "They need to start enforcing the law."

Shadow of Ezra

150,057 views • 27 days ago

🚨Keir Starmer thought this one would be swept under the carpet and use everything going on as a distraction! Don’t think so. No wonder he wants to ban under 16s from social media platforms, and clamp down on the likes of X!
0:59

🚨Keir Starmer thought this one would be swept under the carpet and use everything going on as a distraction! Don’t think so. No wonder he wants to ban under 16s from social media platforms, and clamp down on the likes of X!

Gauci Reports

70,242 views • 2 months ago

A last ditch effort is being made by George Christensen to stop the Social Media U16 age verification regime. He is working on a repeal bill with Senator Alex Antic and is optimistic the coalition is ready to do an about turn. With the understanding this isn’t about protecting kids but controlling us and enforcing Digital ID.
2:04

A last ditch effort is being made by George Christensen to stop the Social Media U16 age verification regime. He is working on a repeal bill with Senator Alex Antic and is optimistic the coalition is ready to do an about turn. With the understanding this isn’t about protecting kids but controlling us and enforcing Digital ID.

Kat A 🌸

35,315 views • 9 months ago

At a conference in Fremantle, WA Opposition leader Basil Zempilas pledged to ban all social media for under-16s Zempilas: “I would ban mobile phones from school completely and no child would be allowed on social media apps before the age of 16.”
1:25

At a conference in Fremantle, WA Opposition leader Basil Zempilas pledged to ban all social media for under-16s Zempilas: “I would ban mobile phones from school completely and no child would be allowed on social media apps before the age of 16.”

Clown Down Under 🤡

65,822 views • 8 months ago

Well said Senator Antic, but the only problem is that you are member of the Liberal Party and the Liberal Party supports Albanese’s plan to force all Australia have some form of government issued or biometric digital ID to log on to the internet. Senator ANTIC (South Australia) (16:46): I think we all want to see our children protected from harm online, but what's the real cost of a social media ban for children? Firstly, it's not clear to me how an age-specific ban could actually be in force short of requiring all Australians to prove their identity, and therefore their age, before actually using their social media accounts. How would it be done? The only reliable methods that are likely to work are those which require social media accounts to be linked to either a government certified ID, digital ID or biometric data. Immediately, we've gone from talking about a law protecting children under 16 from online harm to proposals potentially requiring all Australians to submit personal identification as a condition of using social media. This is how concerns over safety—in this case, children's safety—convince people to hand over their freedom, to hand over their personal information. Of course, this has nothing to do with the fact that a generation of young people are starting to unpick the lies of the corporate media online, does it? Well, of course it does! What a great way to ensure that young people only get a left-wing government message approved to them via their devices. Frankly, the words 'ban' and 'media' should never exist in a sentence together, and parents should always be in charge of what their children watch and what their children watch online.
1:28

Well said Senator Antic, but the only problem is that you are member of the Liberal Party and the Liberal Party supports Albanese’s plan to force all Australia have some form of government issued or biometric digital ID to log on to the internet. Senator ANTIC (South Australia) (16:46): I think we all want to see our children protected from harm online, but what's the real cost of a social media ban for children? Firstly, it's not clear to me how an age-specific ban could actually be in force short of requiring all Australians to prove their identity, and therefore their age, before actually using their social media accounts. How would it be done? The only reliable methods that are likely to work are those which require social media accounts to be linked to either a government certified ID, digital ID or biometric data. Immediately, we've gone from talking about a law protecting children under 16 from online harm to proposals potentially requiring all Australians to submit personal identification as a condition of using social media. This is how concerns over safety—in this case, children's safety—convince people to hand over their freedom, to hand over their personal information. Of course, this has nothing to do with the fact that a generation of young people are starting to unpick the lies of the corporate media online, does it? Well, of course it does! What a great way to ensure that young people only get a left-wing government message approved to them via their devices. Frankly, the words 'ban' and 'media' should never exist in a sentence together, and parents should always be in charge of what their children watch and what their children watch online.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

28,750 views • 1 year ago

“Nobody is stopping a woman from falling in love But If you’re going to fall in love with an ex-convict, be discreet about it and don’t make it loud on social media” — Morayo Brown
1:03

“Nobody is stopping a woman from falling in love But If you’re going to fall in love with an ex-convict, be discreet about it and don’t make it loud on social media” — Morayo Brown

Big Uncle

38,532 views • 2 months ago