Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Asmongold thinks the Supreme Court ruling on Birthright Citizenship should be ignored by the federal government "I don't think there's any reason that we should be listening to a Supreme Court that tells u a Chinese communist that has a baby here, takes the baby back to China for... show more

yeet

163,858 subscribers

386,563 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Asmongold says the military is the real enforcement mechanism, not the Supreme Court "I think honestly, they should just ignore the Supreme Court. The court has no enforcement mechanism. The government, the president, the military is the enforcement mechanism." "We should ignore the court and we should deport them anyway. We should denaturalize every single person who was born here to non legal parents and then send every single one of them out of the country."

Asmongold says the military is the real enforcement mechanism, not the Supreme Court "I think honestly, they should just ignore the Supreme Court. The court has no enforcement mechanism. The government, the president, the military is the enforcement mechanism." "We should ignore the court and we should deport them anyway. We should denaturalize every single person who was born here to non legal parents and then send every single one of them out of the country."

Asmongold Updates

30,230 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

"What has essentially happened now is anybody from China can come over here, have a baby, and that baby will be American no matter what." Megyn sounds off on the Supreme Court for upholding birthright citizenship for the children of foreign nationals.

"What has essentially happened now is anybody from China can come over here, have a baby, and that baby will be American no matter what." Megyn sounds off on the Supreme Court for upholding birthright citizenship for the children of foreign nationals.

The Megyn Kelly Show

35,925 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Do I have this correct? The US Supreme Court just ruled that ANYONE, from ANYWHERE, can come into the country by ANY MEANS and for ANY REASON and if they have a baby in the United States then that baby is automatically an American citizen? This is the dumbest ruling ever.

Do I have this correct? The US Supreme Court just ruled that ANYONE, from ANYWHERE, can come into the country by ANY MEANS and for ANY REASON and if they have a baby in the United States then that baby is automatically an American citizen? This is the dumbest ruling ever.

Derrick Evans

67,530 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Holder: The Supreme Court is a broken institution. And it’s something that has to be part of the national conversation in ’26 and in ’28. If there is a Democratic trifecta in 2028—and I think the possibility of that is pretty good—Supreme Court reform has to be on the table. Term limits, at a minimum, and potentially expanding the Court are things that should be seriously considered. We cannot leave in place, without at least a discussion—and I think without substantive reforms being implemented—the Supreme Court as it is presently constituted.

Holder: The Supreme Court is a broken institution. And it’s something that has to be part of the national conversation in ’26 and in ’28. If there is a Democratic trifecta in 2028—and I think the possibility of that is pretty good—Supreme Court reform has to be on the table. Term limits, at a minimum, and potentially expanding the Court are things that should be seriously considered. We cannot leave in place, without at least a discussion—and I think without substantive reforms being implemented—the Supreme Court as it is presently constituted.

Acyn

1,444,336 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

KV Iyyer - BHARAT 🇮🇳🇮🇱

220,556 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

BREAKING: The US Supreme Court has ruled that Former President Donald Trump can appear on the ballot in Colorado. Many were wondering about the 14th Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court has reversed the decision of the lower courts, stating that enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates, particularly the Presidency, is Congress's responsibility, not the States'. The judgment emphasizes the unique role of federal governance and the need for uniformity across states in federal elections. Some may not like this decision, but the Supreme Court has ruled and we should accept it.

BREAKING: The US Supreme Court has ruled that Former President Donald Trump can appear on the ballot in Colorado. Many were wondering about the 14th Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court has reversed the decision of the lower courts, stating that enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates, particularly the Presidency, is Congress's responsibility, not the States'. The judgment emphasizes the unique role of federal governance and the need for uniformity across states in federal elections. Some may not like this decision, but the Supreme Court has ruled and we should accept it.

Ed Krassenstein

932,089 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 BREAKING: In a massive development, the Supreme Court has agreed to rule on if President Trump has the Constitutional authority to END birthright citizenship for illegal aliens. This will be huge. Birthright citizenship for illegals was NOT intended under the 14th Amendment! SCOTUS SHOULD DO THE RIGHT THING!

🚨 BREAKING: In a massive development, the Supreme Court has agreed to rule on if President Trump has the Constitutional authority to END birthright citizenship for illegal aliens. This will be huge. Birthright citizenship for illegals was NOT intended under the 14th Amendment! SCOTUS SHOULD DO THE RIGHT THING!

Eric Daugherty

180,619 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

.@SIfill_ on whether Trump can end birthright citizenship: “The invasion language, that’s the important part… this has been laying the foundation for the Supreme Court… I would love to be able to tell you the Supreme Court would reject that out of hand, but frankly, I can’t.”

.@SIfill_ on whether Trump can end birthright citizenship: “The invasion language, that’s the important part… this has been laying the foundation for the Supreme Court… I would love to be able to tell you the Supreme Court would reject that out of hand, but frankly, I can’t.”

The Briefing with Jen Psaki

72,816 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

VIDEO | Delhi: On the Opposition's walkout from Parliament, Rajya Sabha MP Menaka Guruswamy says, "Today, the biggest issue is what the government has done to parliamentary democracy. The government and the Speaker are censoring content. We have been raising the issue of the restoration of statehood. We want the Home Minister to come to the House. Even on the Bills being presented, for example, the Bill to increase the number of Supreme Court judges by four, we wanted to have a discussion on the judiciary." She added, "As for what is being said today about the abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir, I was one of the lawyers who argued the case. The government assured the Supreme Court and the then Chief Justice that statehood would be restored. That assurance forms part of the Supreme Court's judgment and has been recorded by the Court. Yet, two years later, there is still no sign of the restoration of statehood." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | Delhi: On the Opposition's walkout from Parliament, Rajya Sabha MP Menaka Guruswamy says, "Today, the biggest issue is what the government has done to parliamentary democracy. The government and the Speaker are censoring content. We have been raising the issue of the restoration of statehood. We want the Home Minister to come to the House. Even on the Bills being presented, for example, the Bill to increase the number of Supreme Court judges by four, we wanted to have a discussion on the judiciary." She added, "As for what is being said today about the abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir, I was one of the lawyers who argued the case. The government assured the Supreme Court and the then Chief Justice that statehood would be restored. That assurance forms part of the Supreme Court's judgment and has been recorded by the Court. Yet, two years later, there is still no sign of the restoration of statehood." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

171,423 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

#WATCH | Delhi | Rajya Sabha MP and Senior Advocate who is representing TMC, Kapil Sibal says, "...This case is an exception, and that is why I have come here. Because the mainstream media is reporting on the court case in a different way, they are reporting that our petition has been dismissed. This is wrong in itself... The TMC's claim in the High Court was that this circular is wrong... the High Court said that this circular is correct. When we came to the Supreme Court, we decided that we would not challenge the circular. But we will request the Supreme Court to implement it... The circular states that the EC has received information from many places that there are going to be some problems in every booth during the election... This is why the EC has decided that every booth will have a nominee from the central government..." He adds, "We stated in the Supreme Court that their own circular says if you want to keep a nominee from the central government, then do so, but keep a nominee from the state government as well. Randomise that as well... The Supreme Court noted that we were challenging the circular there, but we clarified that we are not challenging the circular anymore. We are saying that it should be implemented... Now we have hope. The Supreme Court said, and this is an order, that the EC will follow the circular issued by them both in letter and spirit... What is written is that there will be a nominee from the state government and a nominee from the central government... The mainstream media that is running it is saying that our petition has been dismissed. This is completely wrong... give them the right information..."

#WATCH | Delhi | Rajya Sabha MP and Senior Advocate who is representing TMC, Kapil Sibal says, "...This case is an exception, and that is why I have come here. Because the mainstream media is reporting on the court case in a different way, they are reporting that our petition has been dismissed. This is wrong in itself... The TMC's claim in the High Court was that this circular is wrong... the High Court said that this circular is correct. When we came to the Supreme Court, we decided that we would not challenge the circular. But we will request the Supreme Court to implement it... The circular states that the EC has received information from many places that there are going to be some problems in every booth during the election... This is why the EC has decided that every booth will have a nominee from the central government..." He adds, "We stated in the Supreme Court that their own circular says if you want to keep a nominee from the central government, then do so, but keep a nominee from the state government as well. Randomise that as well... The Supreme Court noted that we were challenging the circular there, but we clarified that we are not challenging the circular anymore. We are saying that it should be implemented... Now we have hope. The Supreme Court said, and this is an order, that the EC will follow the circular issued by them both in letter and spirit... What is written is that there will be a nominee from the state government and a nominee from the central government... The mainstream media that is running it is saying that our petition has been dismissed. This is completely wrong... give them the right information..."

ANI

73,891 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Buttigieg: Under the laws of this country and the constitution, we could have a Supreme Court that better reflects the expectations of the American people and that is more legitimate. We'd be better off with a court that has 13 justices that would match the number of districts that we have in the federal system

Buttigieg: Under the laws of this country and the constitution, we could have a Supreme Court that better reflects the expectations of the American people and that is more legitimate. We'd be better off with a court that has 13 justices that would match the number of districts that we have in the federal system

Acyn

26,053 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

JD Vance announces the Trump Administration plans on correcting the Supreme Court ruling on Birthright Citizenship He says the ruling is “A mistake” “I don't know how anybody can say that if a person who is an illegal alien or a person, for example, who's pregnant and comes to the United States on a vacation, they have a baby and all of a sudden their entire family gets the benefits of American citizenship. I don't think that's what the framers of the 14th Amendment had in mind. I don't think it's the right case — We're going to try to correct that mistake, but, nobody's perfect, including the Supreme Court” The best way to correct this is a Constitutional Amendment Propose an amendment clarifying and limiting the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause to children of US citizens or legal permanent residents

JD Vance announces the Trump Administration plans on correcting the Supreme Court ruling on Birthright Citizenship He says the ruling is “A mistake” “I don't know how anybody can say that if a person who is an illegal alien or a person, for example, who's pregnant and comes to the United States on a vacation, they have a baby and all of a sudden their entire family gets the benefits of American citizenship. I don't think that's what the framers of the 14th Amendment had in mind. I don't think it's the right case — We're going to try to correct that mistake, but, nobody's perfect, including the Supreme Court” The best way to correct this is a Constitutional Amendment Propose an amendment clarifying and limiting the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause to children of US citizens or legal permanent residents

Wall Street Apes

78,402 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi | On the Supreme Court Collegium recommending transfer of Justice Yashwant Varma of the Delhi High Court to his parent High Court in Allahabad after an adverse report against him, Senior advocate and Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal says, "...The issue of corruption within the judiciary is a very serious issue. This is not something that has been articulated by senior councils and lawyers in the country for the first time. It has been going on for years. It is time for the Supreme Court to start looking at issues of how the appointment process takes place. The appointment process should be more transparent and carefully done...Corruption is a very serious issue and despite what PM Modi has said the corruption has increased..."

#WATCH | Delhi | On the Supreme Court Collegium recommending transfer of Justice Yashwant Varma of the Delhi High Court to his parent High Court in Allahabad after an adverse report against him, Senior advocate and Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal says, "...The issue of corruption within the judiciary is a very serious issue. This is not something that has been articulated by senior councils and lawyers in the country for the first time. It has been going on for years. It is time for the Supreme Court to start looking at issues of how the appointment process takes place. The appointment process should be more transparent and carefully done...Corruption is a very serious issue and despite what PM Modi has said the corruption has increased..."

ANI

163,132 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr