Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

At Calcutta Debating Circle debate on whether Hinduism needs protection from Hindutva, Senior Adv. Sai Deepak J tore into TMC MP Mahua Moitra while opposing the motion, drawing loud audience reactions.

On Record

1,503 subscribers

114,330 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Mahua Moitra & J Sai Deepak's Fiery Exchange Over Hindutva & Hinduism “Hindutva Exists Because…” The Debate 2026 by the Calcutta Debating Circle sets the stage for a charged and unfiltered clash on one of India’s most polarising questions: “Hinduism Needs Protection From Hindutva.” A fiery face-off between TMC MP Mahua Moitra and legal scholar J Sai Deepak as they lock horns over faith, politics, identity, and the future of Indian democracy. Sharp arguments, ideological fault lines, and no easy answers. This is a debate that cuts to the core of contemporary India. Moitra took jibes at her senior Swapan Da, which obviously people found uncalled for and not funny at all. J Sai Deepak, opposing the motion, he argued that Hinduism actually needs protection from secularism, rather than Hindutva. He challenged the narrative that Hindutva began with V.D. Savarkar in 1923. Instead, he traced its roots to 19th-century Bengal (1860s–1909) as an “organic Shakta response” to colonial invasion, citing figures like Bankim Chandra Chatterjee and Sri Aurobindo. He countered claims that Hindutva is “hyper-masculine” or strictly “Brahminical vegetarian,” asserting that Bengali masculinity and Shakta traditions (which include offerings of meat and alcohol) are foundational to Hindutva. J Sai Deepak argued that Hindutva is a civilizational necessity that translates into a political vision, and that it is unconstitutional to deny political representation to Hindutva while allowing it for other ideologies like communism. The event featured sharp rebuttals against co-debaters Mani Shankar Aiyar and Mahua Moitra. He accused Aiyar of conflating Hindutva solely with Savarkar and questioned Moitra on whether she had similar critiques for non-Hindu worldviews. The debate, which also featured Sudhanshu Trivedi and Ashutosh, concluded with the audience overwhelmingly voting against the motion, supporting J Sai Deepak's stance. In no way Moitra could’ve matched J Sai, nowhere near and totally decimated. Credit : ANI.

Mahua Moitra & J Sai Deepak's Fiery Exchange Over Hindutva & Hinduism “Hindutva Exists Because…” The Debate 2026 by the Calcutta Debating Circle sets the stage for a charged and unfiltered clash on one of India’s most polarising questions: “Hinduism Needs Protection From Hindutva.” A fiery face-off between TMC MP Mahua Moitra and legal scholar J Sai Deepak as they lock horns over faith, politics, identity, and the future of Indian democracy. Sharp arguments, ideological fault lines, and no easy answers. This is a debate that cuts to the core of contemporary India. Moitra took jibes at her senior Swapan Da, which obviously people found uncalled for and not funny at all. J Sai Deepak, opposing the motion, he argued that Hinduism actually needs protection from secularism, rather than Hindutva. He challenged the narrative that Hindutva began with V.D. Savarkar in 1923. Instead, he traced its roots to 19th-century Bengal (1860s–1909) as an “organic Shakta response” to colonial invasion, citing figures like Bankim Chandra Chatterjee and Sri Aurobindo. He countered claims that Hindutva is “hyper-masculine” or strictly “Brahminical vegetarian,” asserting that Bengali masculinity and Shakta traditions (which include offerings of meat and alcohol) are foundational to Hindutva. J Sai Deepak argued that Hindutva is a civilizational necessity that translates into a political vision, and that it is unconstitutional to deny political representation to Hindutva while allowing it for other ideologies like communism. The event featured sharp rebuttals against co-debaters Mani Shankar Aiyar and Mahua Moitra. He accused Aiyar of conflating Hindutva solely with Savarkar and questioned Moitra on whether she had similar critiques for non-Hindu worldviews. The debate, which also featured Sudhanshu Trivedi and Ashutosh, concluded with the audience overwhelmingly voting against the motion, supporting J Sai Deepak's stance. In no way Moitra could’ve matched J Sai, nowhere near and totally decimated. Credit : ANI.

Augadh

99,876 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

“A Hindu practitioner in Hinduism can imagine love between Hindus and Muslims, but a Hindutva practitioner will say, No, this is love jihad. A Bengali Hindu eating meat will offer meat to Maa Kaali, but a practitioner of Hindutva will say that's not on...,” says Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra participating in the debate on the theme "Hinduism Needs Protection From Hindutva,” on Sunday. Watch:

“A Hindu practitioner in Hinduism can imagine love between Hindus and Muslims, but a Hindutva practitioner will say, No, this is love jihad. A Bengali Hindu eating meat will offer meat to Maa Kaali, but a practitioner of Hindutva will say that's not on...,” says Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra participating in the debate on the theme "Hinduism Needs Protection From Hindutva,” on Sunday. Watch:

Maktoob

47,831 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

J. Sai Deepak delivered a passionate defense of Hindutva in a recent debate, sharply criticizing Mani Shankar Aiyar. The event, hosted by the Calcutta Debating Circle on January 12, 2026, centered on the provocative topic "Hinduism Needs Protection From Hindutva." The debate took place in Kolkata, described by Deepak as the birthplace of Hindutva due to its historical resistance to colonial influences from the 1860s onward. He reframed the motion, arguing Hinduism requires protection through Hindutva, not from it, and needs safeguarding from secularism. Deepak traced Hindutva's roots to Bengal's intellectual history, citing figures like Sri Aurobindo, Swami Vivekananda, and Bankim Chandra Chatterjee, predating Savarkar and RSS by decades. He portrayed Hindutva as an "organic Shakta response" to colonial invasions, embodying Bengal's revolutionary spirit with imagery like Bharat Mata and Durga worship. Deepak dismissed critics conflating Hindutva with RSS origins, emphasizing its civilizational imperative over mere politics, while noting irony in politicians opposing it as a political tool. Deepak went "ballistic" against Mani Shankar Aiyar (referred to as JMA), mocking his outdated script linking Hindutva solely to Savarkar despite contrary scholarship. He ended with a rallying cry: "Jai Ma Kali, Hindutva is the way of the future," positioning it as inevitable amid regional threats. Credit : ANI.

J. Sai Deepak delivered a passionate defense of Hindutva in a recent debate, sharply criticizing Mani Shankar Aiyar. The event, hosted by the Calcutta Debating Circle on January 12, 2026, centered on the provocative topic "Hinduism Needs Protection From Hindutva." The debate took place in Kolkata, described by Deepak as the birthplace of Hindutva due to its historical resistance to colonial influences from the 1860s onward. He reframed the motion, arguing Hinduism requires protection through Hindutva, not from it, and needs safeguarding from secularism. Deepak traced Hindutva's roots to Bengal's intellectual history, citing figures like Sri Aurobindo, Swami Vivekananda, and Bankim Chandra Chatterjee, predating Savarkar and RSS by decades. He portrayed Hindutva as an "organic Shakta response" to colonial invasions, embodying Bengal's revolutionary spirit with imagery like Bharat Mata and Durga worship. Deepak dismissed critics conflating Hindutva with RSS origins, emphasizing its civilizational imperative over mere politics, while noting irony in politicians opposing it as a political tool. Deepak went "ballistic" against Mani Shankar Aiyar (referred to as JMA), mocking his outdated script linking Hindutva solely to Savarkar despite contrary scholarship. He ended with a rallying cry: "Jai Ma Kali, Hindutva is the way of the future," positioning it as inevitable amid regional threats. Credit : ANI.

Augadh

48,833 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

"Hinduism is endangered by Hindutva" My speech at the Calcutta Debating Circle last evening. Will be uploading a recording of the QnA soon as well. Here's the link to the full debate ( I start from 1:18:41 onward

"Hinduism is endangered by Hindutva" My speech at the Calcutta Debating Circle last evening. Will be uploading a recording of the QnA soon as well. Here's the link to the full debate ( I start from 1:18:41 onward

Dr. Ruchika Sharma

165,635 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

#WATCH | Kolkata: At 'The Debate 2026' hosted by the Calcutta Club, TMC MP Mahua Moitra says, "... Hindutva believes that as a political platform, mine is the only way, and Hinduism believes as a religion and a spiritual platform, that there is room for a lot of others along the way. A Hindu practitioner in Hinduism can imagine love between Hindus and Muslims, but a Hindutva practitioner will say, No, this is love jihad. A Bengali Hindu eating meat will offer meat to Maa Kaali, but a practitioner of Hindutva will say that's not on... So the core question here is, does Hinduism need to protect itself from Hindutva? I would say that the best way to continue to protect Hinduism is to continue to realise that Hindutva is there because Hinduism was there..."

#WATCH | Kolkata: At 'The Debate 2026' hosted by the Calcutta Club, TMC MP Mahua Moitra says, "... Hindutva believes that as a political platform, mine is the only way, and Hinduism believes as a religion and a spiritual platform, that there is room for a lot of others along the way. A Hindu practitioner in Hinduism can imagine love between Hindus and Muslims, but a Hindutva practitioner will say, No, this is love jihad. A Bengali Hindu eating meat will offer meat to Maa Kaali, but a practitioner of Hindutva will say that's not on... So the core question here is, does Hinduism need to protect itself from Hindutva? I would say that the best way to continue to protect Hinduism is to continue to realise that Hindutva is there because Hinduism was there..."

ANI

104,537 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

What Was Hinduism Like Before "Hindutva" Existed? In the Calcutta Club debate on 'Whether Hinduism Needs Protection From Hindutva', Mani Shankar Aiyar says, "You have seen that Hindutva vigilantes beat up and even kill anyone suspected of hoarding, eating, or transporting beef (cow’s meat)." He then quotes Gandhi, saying, "It is a denial of Hinduism and ahimsa to kill a human being to protect a cow." And then attributes this violent Hindu reaction to 'Hindutva', saying "How then can Hinduism rely on thugs and murderers calling themselves Hindutvawadis to protect itself?" So, for the likes of Aiyar, here is a sneak peek into the history of Hinduism (as told by foreign travellers), long before Hindutva - the "bigoted", "exclusionary" ideology invented in the 19th century- existed. This is what Hindus, i.e. the believers of 'Hinduism', used to do with anyone who dared kill a Cow:

What Was Hinduism Like Before "Hindutva" Existed? In the Calcutta Club debate on 'Whether Hinduism Needs Protection From Hindutva', Mani Shankar Aiyar says, "You have seen that Hindutva vigilantes beat up and even kill anyone suspected of hoarding, eating, or transporting beef (cow’s meat)." He then quotes Gandhi, saying, "It is a denial of Hinduism and ahimsa to kill a human being to protect a cow." And then attributes this violent Hindu reaction to 'Hindutva', saying "How then can Hinduism rely on thugs and murderers calling themselves Hindutvawadis to protect itself?" So, for the likes of Aiyar, here is a sneak peek into the history of Hinduism (as told by foreign travellers), long before Hindutva - the "bigoted", "exclusionary" ideology invented in the 19th century- existed. This is what Hindus, i.e. the believers of 'Hinduism', used to do with anyone who dared kill a Cow:

Prateek Rajput

23,088 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

#WATCH | Kolkata: On an egg attack on TMC MP Mahua Moitra, WB BJP President Samik Bhattacharya says, "This egg-throwing must stop, and the TMC leader who is sitting hidden at home needs to step out into the field. TMC is attacking TMC... How can the police identify those who have eggs in their pockets? There is no machine to catch this. Metal detectors don't detect eggs, so let us bring in a new machine... It is ruining Bengal's image..."

#WATCH | Kolkata: On an egg attack on TMC MP Mahua Moitra, WB BJP President Samik Bhattacharya says, "This egg-throwing must stop, and the TMC leader who is sitting hidden at home needs to step out into the field. TMC is attacking TMC... How can the police identify those who have eggs in their pockets? There is no machine to catch this. Metal detectors don't detect eggs, so let us bring in a new machine... It is ruining Bengal's image..."

ANI

319,486 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce

UPDATE from Calcutta Club - The speakers for the motion, particularly Mani Shankar Iyer and Mahua Moitra, stayed true to form. A heady cocktail of arrogance, selective history and personal diatribes, ensuring their time was spent more on sermonising than substantiating. Ms Moitra, in a moment of intellectual self goal, attempted to paint Hinduism as comfortably non vegetarian and Hindutva as rigidly vegetarian. A theory that collapsed under its own weight when she invoked Gandhi’s Hinduism (Gandhi being a staunch vegetarian), while conveniently forgetting that Savarkar, the most vocal proponent of Hindutva, was an atheist and a meat eater. The House, rather sportingly, even recalled the delightful anecdote of Savarkar cooking prawns when Gandhi visited him in London. Reality, as usual, proved inconvenient. ashutosh, sadly, seemed to be debating a motion that only existed in his head. A complete disconnect from both subject and audience, marred by weak articulation and arguments that struggled to locate either logic or coherence. Dr. Ruchika Sharma started with promise but quickly wandered into an entirely different TED Talk on ancient Hindu history and Sanatan Dharma. The actual motion was left abandoned at the altar, while we were treated to an oddly abrasive, patronising monologue delivered with the self certainty of the only “real historian” in the room. Fortunately, KunalSARKAR played the role of the reality check, puncturing the self importance with humour and restoring some order. His intervention was a reminder that good moderation is not just about keeping time, but about keeping egos in check. From the against the motion camp, Swapan Dasgupta was in sublime form. Witty, precise, historically grounded and linguistically commanding. His ten minutes were a masterclass in how control over language shapes narratives, and how Anglophile discomfort with the word Hindutva is often rooted more in prejudice than principle. Agnimitra Paul BJP, from whom much was expected, unfortunately and prematurely, converted her slot into a miniature election rally to the wrong audience. The motion was nowhere to be found, and even the ever patient moderator KunalSARKAR had to humorously rein her in, a moment that drew more applause than her argument. Then entered Sai Deepak J, the speaker many were waiting for. Unapologetic, unburdened by political correctness and razor-sharp. He dismantled the proponents arguments with clinical ease, to thunderous approval from the “guspetias” in the audience (a term Ms Moitra used rather generously for the alleged Hindutvawadis who had infiltrated Calcutta’s elite circle, and one that earned her a solid round of boos). His arguments were crisp, historically honest, and refreshingly free from cherry picking. Finally, Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi arrived to loud cheers, only to leave many disappointed. Instead of engaging the motion, he drifted into grievance-listing and rhetorical digressions, turning what should have been a strong finish into a missed opportunity. Though the judges declared the debate a draw (perhaps in the fear and the pressures mounted by the elite administrators), the overwhelming show of hands against the motion was a rude awakening for Calcutta’s pseudo-liberal elite. It signalled that the tide is turning, and that their once-comfortable narratives are now being dismantled with ease by voices they never thought belonged to the “intelligentsia”

UPDATE from Calcutta Club - The speakers for the motion, particularly Mani Shankar Iyer and Mahua Moitra, stayed true to form. A heady cocktail of arrogance, selective history and personal diatribes, ensuring their time was spent more on sermonising than substantiating. Ms Moitra, in a moment of intellectual self goal, attempted to paint Hinduism as comfortably non vegetarian and Hindutva as rigidly vegetarian. A theory that collapsed under its own weight when she invoked Gandhi’s Hinduism (Gandhi being a staunch vegetarian), while conveniently forgetting that Savarkar, the most vocal proponent of Hindutva, was an atheist and a meat eater. The House, rather sportingly, even recalled the delightful anecdote of Savarkar cooking prawns when Gandhi visited him in London. Reality, as usual, proved inconvenient. ashutosh, sadly, seemed to be debating a motion that only existed in his head. A complete disconnect from both subject and audience, marred by weak articulation and arguments that struggled to locate either logic or coherence. Dr. Ruchika Sharma started with promise but quickly wandered into an entirely different TED Talk on ancient Hindu history and Sanatan Dharma. The actual motion was left abandoned at the altar, while we were treated to an oddly abrasive, patronising monologue delivered with the self certainty of the only “real historian” in the room. Fortunately, KunalSARKAR played the role of the reality check, puncturing the self importance with humour and restoring some order. His intervention was a reminder that good moderation is not just about keeping time, but about keeping egos in check. From the against the motion camp, Swapan Dasgupta was in sublime form. Witty, precise, historically grounded and linguistically commanding. His ten minutes were a masterclass in how control over language shapes narratives, and how Anglophile discomfort with the word Hindutva is often rooted more in prejudice than principle. Agnimitra Paul BJP, from whom much was expected, unfortunately and prematurely, converted her slot into a miniature election rally to the wrong audience. The motion was nowhere to be found, and even the ever patient moderator KunalSARKAR had to humorously rein her in, a moment that drew more applause than her argument. Then entered Sai Deepak J, the speaker many were waiting for. Unapologetic, unburdened by political correctness and razor-sharp. He dismantled the proponents arguments with clinical ease, to thunderous approval from the “guspetias” in the audience (a term Ms Moitra used rather generously for the alleged Hindutvawadis who had infiltrated Calcutta’s elite circle, and one that earned her a solid round of boos). His arguments were crisp, historically honest, and refreshingly free from cherry picking. Finally, Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi arrived to loud cheers, only to leave many disappointed. Instead of engaging the motion, he drifted into grievance-listing and rhetorical digressions, turning what should have been a strong finish into a missed opportunity. Though the judges declared the debate a draw (perhaps in the fear and the pressures mounted by the elite administrators), the overwhelming show of hands against the motion was a rude awakening for Calcutta’s pseudo-liberal elite. It signalled that the tide is turning, and that their once-comfortable narratives are now being dismantled with ease by voices they never thought belonged to the “intelligentsia”

Adit

110,770 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Calcutta Club debate & Sai Deepak J’s speech underline the urgency of framing new Bharat with Hindutva in its true historical context. As I had argued in my🧵 on the “Triangle of Hindu Nationalism” - Bengal ➝ Punjab ➝ Maharashtra - the ideological roots of Hindutva lie in Bengal. Sai Deepak reiterated this, calling Bengal its birthplace, forged in Shakta spirit as a response to dual colonialism faced by Hindus. Point to ponder: As I have always said, in order to reclaim any region into the Hindutva fold, one must not mock its political choices but gently detach it from narrow ethnic, linguistic or caste identities through culture and politics. Once a civilisational periphery, Bengal became the subcontinent’s nerve-centre in the 18th century, only to slip back after Independence. The moment has come for Bengal to reclaim leadership, and act as the Hindutva vanguard for the entire East, from West Bengal to Bangladesh to the North-East.

Calcutta Club debate & Sai Deepak J’s speech underline the urgency of framing new Bharat with Hindutva in its true historical context. As I had argued in my🧵 on the “Triangle of Hindu Nationalism” - Bengal ➝ Punjab ➝ Maharashtra - the ideological roots of Hindutva lie in Bengal. Sai Deepak reiterated this, calling Bengal its birthplace, forged in Shakta spirit as a response to dual colonialism faced by Hindus. Point to ponder: As I have always said, in order to reclaim any region into the Hindutva fold, one must not mock its political choices but gently detach it from narrow ethnic, linguistic or caste identities through culture and politics. Once a civilisational periphery, Bengal became the subcontinent’s nerve-centre in the 18th century, only to slip back after Independence. The moment has come for Bengal to reclaim leadership, and act as the Hindutva vanguard for the entire East, from West Bengal to Bangladesh to the North-East.

Crystal Clear

176,461 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The Wokeshwari Show | SPOOF PM Modi is getting the 'Knesset Medal' in Israel, but Swara is winning the 'Sharia Benchmark' at home. Watch Wokeshwari Ritika J Chandola's loud makeup tutorial for the Jerusalem Parliament. From renaming her son 'Mohammad Rahul' to swapping her foundation for Multani Mitti from Palestine, she’s carrying the entire weight of Indian secularism on her double chin. In this biting satire, 'Swara' explains why her makeup needs to be LOUD enough to reach Jerusalem. Watch her transform into a 'Sharia-compliant' activist while reacting to the PM's visit.

The Wokeshwari Show | SPOOF PM Modi is getting the 'Knesset Medal' in Israel, but Swara is winning the 'Sharia Benchmark' at home. Watch Wokeshwari Ritika J Chandola's loud makeup tutorial for the Jerusalem Parliament. From renaming her son 'Mohammad Rahul' to swapping her foundation for Multani Mitti from Palestine, she’s carrying the entire weight of Indian secularism on her double chin. In this biting satire, 'Swara' explains why her makeup needs to be LOUD enough to reach Jerusalem. Watch her transform into a 'Sharia-compliant' activist while reacting to the PM's visit.

OpIndia.com

32,744 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

VIDEO | At a press conference, TMC MP Mahua Moitra says, "On the Election Commission of India, it is pertinent to note that on July 2, at around 12 noon, the traitors of the Trinamool Congress, who were elected on Mamata Banerjee's symbol but are now very shamelessly calling themselves a breakaway bloc, petitioned the Election Commission. They submitted their complaint around noon, and by that very evening, the Election Commission had written to us. This is unheard of. We have approached the Election Commission many times, and it is usually hard-pressed to respond even within a week. So, for it to write to the Trinamool Congress within three to four hours was unprecedented. The Election Commission has always insisted on proper authorisation and authorised representatives. I remember a time when very senior leaders of the INDIA alliance had gone from each party, and only two or three were allowed inside, while senior leaders like Mr. Jairam Ramesh had to wait outside. They were not even allowed into the room. So, first, whom did this faction represent that they were allowed to go in?..."

VIDEO | At a press conference, TMC MP Mahua Moitra says, "On the Election Commission of India, it is pertinent to note that on July 2, at around 12 noon, the traitors of the Trinamool Congress, who were elected on Mamata Banerjee's symbol but are now very shamelessly calling themselves a breakaway bloc, petitioned the Election Commission. They submitted their complaint around noon, and by that very evening, the Election Commission had written to us. This is unheard of. We have approached the Election Commission many times, and it is usually hard-pressed to respond even within a week. So, for it to write to the Trinamool Congress within three to four hours was unprecedented. The Election Commission has always insisted on proper authorisation and authorised representatives. I remember a time when very senior leaders of the INDIA alliance had gone from each party, and only two or three were allowed inside, while senior leaders like Mr. Jairam Ramesh had to wait outside. They were not even allowed into the room. So, first, whom did this faction represent that they were allowed to go in?..."

Press Trust of India

59,613 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

🚨 Rory & Mal on J. Cole’s The Fall Off Mal says Cole will never mentally get over the decision he made that day when he apologized on stage stressing Cole sounds stuck in that moment, with the confidence gone and the music coming from a near victim mentality, Disc 29 sounds like Off-Season Cole, while Disc 39 sounds more timid and reflective. Rory & Mal say “What If” dragged Kendrick and Drake back into the conversation unnecessarily, making it impossible to fully move on. Mal also questions why Kendrick isn’t on the album at all, saying whether it was cleared or not, the absence is loud.

🚨 Rory & Mal on J. Cole’s The Fall Off Mal says Cole will never mentally get over the decision he made that day when he apologized on stage stressing Cole sounds stuck in that moment, with the confidence gone and the music coming from a near victim mentality, Disc 29 sounds like Off-Season Cole, while Disc 39 sounds more timid and reflective. Rory & Mal say “What If” dragged Kendrick and Drake back into the conversation unnecessarily, making it impossible to fully move on. Mal also questions why Kendrick isn’t on the album at all, saying whether it was cleared or not, the absence is loud.

CY Chels

340,121 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Can the police freeze a political party's bank accounts and bring its day-to-day functioning to a halt? Before the #CalcuttaHighCourt, Senior Advocate Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for a faction claiming to represent the Trinamool Congress (#TMC), challenged the freezing of the party's bank accounts under Section 102 #CrPC. He argued that the provision does not permit a blanket freeze on bank accounts without a clear and direct nexus to the alleged offence. According to Singhvi, the action has disrupted the party's functioning by preventing it from paying salaries, utility bills, and other routine expenses. The opposing side questioned whether the petitioners were authorized to represent the party, arguing that their tenure had ended and new office bearers had been appointed. The case brought into focus the limits of police powers under criminal law and the rights of political parties. Credits: Calcutta High Court This video is shared for legal awareness and educational purposes only. #BankAccountFreeze #ConstitutionalLaw #CriminalLaw #PoliticalParties #RuleOfLaw #CourtProceedings #IndianJudiciary #LegalAwareness

Can the police freeze a political party's bank accounts and bring its day-to-day functioning to a halt? Before the #CalcuttaHighCourt, Senior Advocate Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for a faction claiming to represent the Trinamool Congress (#TMC), challenged the freezing of the party's bank accounts under Section 102 #CrPC. He argued that the provision does not permit a blanket freeze on bank accounts without a clear and direct nexus to the alleged offence. According to Singhvi, the action has disrupted the party's functioning by preventing it from paying salaries, utility bills, and other routine expenses. The opposing side questioned whether the petitioners were authorized to represent the party, arguing that their tenure had ended and new office bearers had been appointed. The case brought into focus the limits of police powers under criminal law and the rights of political parties. Credits: Calcutta High Court This video is shared for legal awareness and educational purposes only. #BankAccountFreeze #ConstitutionalLaw #CriminalLaw #PoliticalParties #RuleOfLaw #CourtProceedings #IndianJudiciary #LegalAwareness

Lawstreet Journal

16,392 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

🚨PENTAGON WHISTLEBLOWER: ‘Pete Hegseth is revelling in death & destruction. ILLEGAL & CRIMINAL use of military force has been amplified by the war on Iran.’ ‘We’ve seen the rhetoric from the start, from the day of the inauguration, there was internal paperwork in the Pentagon, I whistleblew on this, going up to senior levels, calling for the dissolution of the Civilian Protection Center of Excellence. These people on Hegseth’s transition team, people aligned with Hegseth’s vision already that were looking at the civilian protection effort as one of those woke efforts that needs dissolved. We see the rhetoric from Hegseth on this, revelling in death and destruction and lethality, on so-called ‘wokeness’ and ‘stupid rules of engagement’, disregard for Geneva Conventions and just the law of war. So it’s just not surprising at all that our programme, and everything it was doing, was one of the casualties. Let’s look at this whole year and the illegal and criminal use of military force under Hegseth and then going into the Iran war where that’s just been amplified.’ —Master Sgt. Wes Bryant, Pentagon Whistleblower and Former Pentagon Chief of Civilian Harm Assessments, on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇 Wes J. Bryant - Former Pentagon | War Analyst

🚨PENTAGON WHISTLEBLOWER: ‘Pete Hegseth is revelling in death & destruction. ILLEGAL & CRIMINAL use of military force has been amplified by the war on Iran.’ ‘We’ve seen the rhetoric from the start, from the day of the inauguration, there was internal paperwork in the Pentagon, I whistleblew on this, going up to senior levels, calling for the dissolution of the Civilian Protection Center of Excellence. These people on Hegseth’s transition team, people aligned with Hegseth’s vision already that were looking at the civilian protection effort as one of those woke efforts that needs dissolved. We see the rhetoric from Hegseth on this, revelling in death and destruction and lethality, on so-called ‘wokeness’ and ‘stupid rules of engagement’, disregard for Geneva Conventions and just the law of war. So it’s just not surprising at all that our programme, and everything it was doing, was one of the casualties. Let’s look at this whole year and the illegal and criminal use of military force under Hegseth and then going into the Iran war where that’s just been amplified.’ —Master Sgt. Wes Bryant, Pentagon Whistleblower and Former Pentagon Chief of Civilian Harm Assessments, on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇 Wes J. Bryant - Former Pentagon | War Analyst

Going Underground

20,511 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The Furaha City Festival turned into a drama-filled spectacle, delivering not just electrifying performances but also heated rivalries. While Willy Paul’s clash with Diamond Platnumz had already set the tone for the night, Kenyan rapper Khaligraph Jones took things to a whole new level with his bold proclamations. Standing on stage, Khaligraph declared not only that he is the best rapper in Africa but also crowned himself the best artist in Tanzania—right in front of Diamond Platnumz, who has long been considered the king of Tanzanian music. The audacious claim left the audience stunned, with whispers of disbelief rippling through the crowd. As if that wasn’t enough, Khaligraph doubled down by performing his infamous diss track aimed at Tanzanian rappers, a song he released months ago accusing them of “sleeping on the job.” The track reignited old tensions, drawing cheers from his fans and mixed reactions from Tanzanian music lovers in the crowd.

The Furaha City Festival turned into a drama-filled spectacle, delivering not just electrifying performances but also heated rivalries. While Willy Paul’s clash with Diamond Platnumz had already set the tone for the night, Kenyan rapper Khaligraph Jones took things to a whole new level with his bold proclamations. Standing on stage, Khaligraph declared not only that he is the best rapper in Africa but also crowned himself the best artist in Tanzania—right in front of Diamond Platnumz, who has long been considered the king of Tanzanian music. The audacious claim left the audience stunned, with whispers of disbelief rippling through the crowd. As if that wasn’t enough, Khaligraph doubled down by performing his infamous diss track aimed at Tanzanian rappers, a song he released months ago accusing them of “sleeping on the job.” The track reignited old tensions, drawing cheers from his fans and mixed reactions from Tanzanian music lovers in the crowd.

Cliff Harvest

114,058 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🔥⚔️ PRIME SHOWCASE ANNOUNCEMENT — WW1 ⚔️🔥 A major new matchup is officially set for the Word War Debate arena. Ana Kasparian (Ana Kasparian) is stepping into #WWD for the first time at WW1, bringing years of experience as a progressive commentator, journalist, and cultural critic. Known for her sharp analysis, confident delivery, and deep engagement with feminist theory and modern political movements, Ana has spent her career debating some of the most contested ideas in American culture. She will face an already-announced contender who needs no introduction. Pearl Davis (H. Pearl Davis) has rapidly become one of the most polarizing voices challenging modern feminism, gender norms, and cultural narratives. Unfiltered, confrontational, and quick on the rebuttal, Pearl enters the arena ready to defend her views under real pressure, live on stage. These two will meet LIVE in Atlantic City, NJ on January 10th as the Prime Showcase debate at WW1. Debate Topic: “Has modern feminism empowered women-or led them into cultural and relational decline?” The debate will be moderated by Ben Swann (Ben Swann), with live analysis from the WWD panel: •Gavin McInnes (Gavin McInnes) – Right-wing analyst •Kyla Turner (notsoErudite) – Left-wing analyst •Sam Tripoli (Sam Tripoli) – Independent analyst This is not a discussion. This is not a podcast. This is structured, live debate—where ideas are tested in real time and the audience decides what lands. Follow Word War Debate for all matchup drops and updates. We still have the MAIN CARD to announce! Get your tickets now — link in the comments. The stage is set. The arguments are ready. #WW1 is coming.

🔥⚔️ PRIME SHOWCASE ANNOUNCEMENT — WW1 ⚔️🔥 A major new matchup is officially set for the Word War Debate arena. Ana Kasparian (Ana Kasparian) is stepping into #WWD for the first time at WW1, bringing years of experience as a progressive commentator, journalist, and cultural critic. Known for her sharp analysis, confident delivery, and deep engagement with feminist theory and modern political movements, Ana has spent her career debating some of the most contested ideas in American culture. She will face an already-announced contender who needs no introduction. Pearl Davis (H. Pearl Davis) has rapidly become one of the most polarizing voices challenging modern feminism, gender norms, and cultural narratives. Unfiltered, confrontational, and quick on the rebuttal, Pearl enters the arena ready to defend her views under real pressure, live on stage. These two will meet LIVE in Atlantic City, NJ on January 10th as the Prime Showcase debate at WW1. Debate Topic: “Has modern feminism empowered women-or led them into cultural and relational decline?” The debate will be moderated by Ben Swann (Ben Swann), with live analysis from the WWD panel: •Gavin McInnes (Gavin McInnes) – Right-wing analyst •Kyla Turner (notsoErudite) – Left-wing analyst •Sam Tripoli (Sam Tripoli) – Independent analyst This is not a discussion. This is not a podcast. This is structured, live debate—where ideas are tested in real time and the audience decides what lands. Follow Word War Debate for all matchup drops and updates. We still have the MAIN CARD to announce! Get your tickets now — link in the comments. The stage is set. The arguments are ready. #WW1 is coming.

Word War Debate

78,362 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

#KukiTerrorists have launched attacks at the Naga dominated areas of Moirangpurel and Tumulok areas at around 1 p.m. on 6th February. They came down from the Kuki village of Molham and fired indiscriminately on a group of labourers (at least 8-9 people) working in a sand quarry. Workers Ebomcha and Bobocha allege that the Kuki terr0rists had attempted to surround them and continued to fire upon the fleeing labourers. Several people, including women and children were forced to flee for their lives. Kuki terr0rists fired several rounds into the vehicles used for carrying sands and damaged the tyres of three vehicles. The repeated targeting of civilians by Kuki_Zo in Manipur must stop. 28 civilians have lost their lives in the last 2 months. Full scale military action must be taken against these Kuki terr0rists and their sympathisers. Ritu #सत्यसाधक हम लोग We The People 🇮🇳 Divya Kumar Soti Abhijit Iyer-Mitra Abhijit Chavda Nupur J Sharma Hindu Genocide Watch HinduPost Stop Hindu Hate Advocacy Network (SHHAN) Kreately.in Zee News English Anand Ranganathan WION AajTak Dainik Bhaskar Anshul Abhishek 🔥 Anshul Saxena The Pamphlet Dr. Suresh Chavhanke “Sudarshan News” Sudarshan News 🇮🇳 Indrani 🇮🇳 Sai Deepak J Dr Manisha Sharma Shashank Shekhar Jha ADV. ASHUTOSH J. DUBEY 🇮🇳 Sanjay Dixit ಸಂಜಯ್ ದೀಕ್ಷಿತ್ संजय दीक्षित The Jaipur Dialogues Right Singh Rati #ProtectWithPen Shivam Mishra कालनेमी ACRF मुन्ना भाई, पूर्वसैनिक/RSP पं धवरैया.आरक्षण गंदा @UnapologeticH1 Ritika J Chandola Shubham Sharma Shubham Shukla Pak Army Elections 2024

#KukiTerrorists have launched attacks at the Naga dominated areas of Moirangpurel and Tumulok areas at around 1 p.m. on 6th February. They came down from the Kuki village of Molham and fired indiscriminately on a group of labourers (at least 8-9 people) working in a sand quarry. Workers Ebomcha and Bobocha allege that the Kuki terr0rists had attempted to surround them and continued to fire upon the fleeing labourers. Several people, including women and children were forced to flee for their lives. Kuki terr0rists fired several rounds into the vehicles used for carrying sands and damaged the tyres of three vehicles. The repeated targeting of civilians by Kuki_Zo in Manipur must stop. 28 civilians have lost their lives in the last 2 months. Full scale military action must be taken against these Kuki terr0rists and their sympathisers. Ritu #सत्यसाधक हम लोग We The People 🇮🇳 Divya Kumar Soti Abhijit Iyer-Mitra Abhijit Chavda Nupur J Sharma Hindu Genocide Watch HinduPost Stop Hindu Hate Advocacy Network (SHHAN) Kreately.in Zee News English Anand Ranganathan WION AajTak Dainik Bhaskar Anshul Abhishek 🔥 Anshul Saxena The Pamphlet Dr. Suresh Chavhanke “Sudarshan News” Sudarshan News 🇮🇳 Indrani 🇮🇳 Sai Deepak J Dr Manisha Sharma Shashank Shekhar Jha ADV. ASHUTOSH J. DUBEY 🇮🇳 Sanjay Dixit ಸಂಜಯ್ ದೀಕ್ಷಿತ್ संजय दीक्षित The Jaipur Dialogues Right Singh Rati #ProtectWithPen Shivam Mishra कालनेमी ACRF मुन्ना भाई, पूर्वसैनिक/RSP पं धवरैया.आरक्षण गंदा @UnapologeticH1 Ritika J Chandola Shubham Sharma Shubham Shukla Pak Army Elections 2024

Vladimir Adityanath

11,290 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🚨 PEOPLE ARE SAYING THE SUN LOOKS DIFFERENT — AND THEY'RE BLAMING BILL GATES People who claim the sun looks different are often treated like they're crazy. They say it looks whiter. Harsher. More like an LED spotlight than the warm yellow sun they remember growing up with. Most people laugh it off. But now many are wondering if something bigger is going on. While the public was debating whether anything had changed at all, some of the world's most powerful people were openly discussing ways to change it. Real discussions about solar geoengineering, the idea of reflecting a portion of sunlight away from Earth to cool the planet. The controversy exploded even further when Bill Gates became associated with funding research into the concept, and the subject later surfaced in high profile reports and interviews that brought the "dimming the sun" debate to a much wider audience. The stated goal is reducing global temperatures. But many people have a different concern: Who gets to decide how much sunlight reaches the planet? Now videos are going viral showing people comparing old photos, documenting unusual glare patterns, and claiming the sun doesn't look or feel the same as it did years ago. Scientists point to atmospheric conditions, pollution, climate factors, and camera technology. Others think that explanation doesn't tell the whole story. Then people discovered something that made the entire debate even more controversial. The idea of dimming the sun wasn't coming from internet conspiracy forums. It was being discussed by some of the world's most powerful people. That's when a lot of people started asking a very different question. Not whether the sun looks different. But who gets to decide if it should. Should Bill Gates decide how much sunlight reaches Earth?

HustleBitch

88,838 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

REPORT | A Yemeni drone exploded in Eilat on Wednesday night, injuring at least 23 Israelis–including two in very critical condition–Israeli Army Radio confirmed. Yemeni media said the blast tore through hotel rooms and nearby facilities at a tourist center, leaving explosive remnants that required bomb squads. The army admitted its defenses failed to intercept the drone, as the critically wounded were rushed to Soroka Hospital in Beersheba. It wasn't immediately clear if the injured were hurt by the drone or an interceptor. The attack follows earlier Houthi strikes on Eilat hotels and Ramon Airport and is part of nearly 90 missiles and 40 drones launched at Israel since March, meant to deter Israel’s genocidal violence in Gaza and continued strikes on civilian targets in Yemen. Those included the August assassinations of senior Houthi civilian government leaders in Sanaa, including Yemen’s Prime Minister, and the single deadliest attack on journalists in modern history, which killed 32 Yemeni reporters and media staff earlier in September. Israeli officials acknowledged ongoing investigations into why Iron Dome and other systems failed. Defense Minister Katz vowed escalation: “The Houthi terrorists refuse to learn from Iran, Lebanon, and Gaza–and they will learn the hard way. Those who harm Israel will be harmed sevenfold.” Rescue teams remain on high alert across Eilat and the south. Yemen’s armed forces claimed responsibility, saying their UAVs hit two Israeli targets in Umm al-Rashrash (Eilat), saying the operation achieved its goal ‘thanks to Allah.’ while defenses failed. They said it was the second strike in 24 hours, following Tuesday’s raids on Eilat and Beersheba. 🎥 Yemeni army spokesman re-shared footage of the strike: “The Yemeni drone’s voice may not be heard, but its explosion is loud and clear!”

REPORT | A Yemeni drone exploded in Eilat on Wednesday night, injuring at least 23 Israelis–including two in very critical condition–Israeli Army Radio confirmed. Yemeni media said the blast tore through hotel rooms and nearby facilities at a tourist center, leaving explosive remnants that required bomb squads. The army admitted its defenses failed to intercept the drone, as the critically wounded were rushed to Soroka Hospital in Beersheba. It wasn't immediately clear if the injured were hurt by the drone or an interceptor. The attack follows earlier Houthi strikes on Eilat hotels and Ramon Airport and is part of nearly 90 missiles and 40 drones launched at Israel since March, meant to deter Israel’s genocidal violence in Gaza and continued strikes on civilian targets in Yemen. Those included the August assassinations of senior Houthi civilian government leaders in Sanaa, including Yemen’s Prime Minister, and the single deadliest attack on journalists in modern history, which killed 32 Yemeni reporters and media staff earlier in September. Israeli officials acknowledged ongoing investigations into why Iron Dome and other systems failed. Defense Minister Katz vowed escalation: “The Houthi terrorists refuse to learn from Iran, Lebanon, and Gaza–and they will learn the hard way. Those who harm Israel will be harmed sevenfold.” Rescue teams remain on high alert across Eilat and the south. Yemen’s armed forces claimed responsibility, saying their UAVs hit two Israeli targets in Umm al-Rashrash (Eilat), saying the operation achieved its goal ‘thanks to Allah.’ while defenses failed. They said it was the second strike in 24 hours, following Tuesday’s raids on Eilat and Beersheba. 🎥 Yemeni army spokesman re-shared footage of the strike: “The Yemeni drone’s voice may not be heard, but its explosion is loud and clear!”

Drop Site

33,448 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨🇺🇸 CHARLIE KIRK SHOT DEAD, AMERICA’S POLITICAL FLASHPOINT On September 10, 2025, Charlie Kirk was assassinated in Utah. A single bullet cut through the chaos of a college courtyard and ended the life of one of America’s most polarizing conservative voices. It happened during Turning Point USA’s “American Comeback Tour,” a flashy outdoor debate at Utah Valley University where Kirk challenged students to “prove him wrong.” No one expected a sniper perched 430 feet away on the rooftop of the Losee Center, waiting for the perfect shot. The bullet tore through the air and struck Kirk in the neck. He collapsed instantly. Panic detonated across the crowd of 3,000. Students scattered, security scrambled, and campus police locked down buildings as people screamed to “get down” and “run.” Within hours, Kirk was pronounced dead at a local hospital. The assassin vanished into the chaos and remains at large. The setup looked chillingly professional. A scoped rifle, an elevated perch, a clean escape route. The shooter exploited blind spots in campus security, slipping away while thousands were still reeling from the shock. Authorities detained suspects, but no one was charged. Forensic analysis points to a rooftop firing position that lined up with Kirk’s stage. Witnesses and security footage converge on the same spot. It was a textbook hit, carried out in broad daylight against a high-profile political figure, and in front of cameras. The symbolism cut deep. Minutes earlier, Kirk had been speaking about gun violence and mass shootings. His call to stay calm in the face of chaos was interrupted by the very violence he was describing. In the aftermath, comparisons poured in. Lone gunmen. Protection failures. Culture-war tinder catching fire. Critics blasted security lapses, while supporters said this proves the country’s political fever is turning lethal. Charlie Kirk’s death is more than the loss of a conservative firebrand. It is a rupture in the national psyche. In a country saturated with firearms, political stages can turn into sniper alleys. The line between debate and death has rarely felt thinner. Source: AiTelly

Mario Nawfal

284,858 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce