Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

At this point clinging to Epstein mythology requires deliberately not learning the most basic factual details of the thing you claim to be so deeply invested in, and so deeply troubled by. That's how you can stay comfortably ensconced in the realm of casual banter, goofy jokes, and aimless...

69,541 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

“Ghislaine Maxwell remains, as of yet, the only woman convicted for trafficking underage victims to absolutely nobody. And that is the fundamental conundrum in the case of the Epstein files. And that is that other than Prince Andrew having been stripped of his title, and Mandelson having to have had to quit the House of Lords and his position in the Labour Party, it doesn’t appear - in the way of punishments - for anyone to have faced anything that could even be described as being close to justice. Keep in mind, and as we’re going to go into in the details of this stream, resignations and public shamings and loss of titles, considering the scale and the implications of the crimes we are talking about, cannot in any way be defined as justice. If we’re discussing, as it appears increasingly to be the case, the international globalist trafficking ring that was trafficking in underage victims for the purposes of acquiring compromise on politicians to sell out the national interests of on behalf of a foreign power, presumably most likely to be Mossad, then we’re talking of not just treason here, we’re also talking, of course, of the crime of underage rape and trafficking, but including, as we’re about to hear in this stream, torture, rape, and so on and so forth. So considering the sheer scale and enormity of the crimes, a resignation here and a stripping of a title there doesn’t feel anywhere near close to justice, especially for those who may have fallen victim to this scheme. So that is the topic for today. Epstein Files Fallout: Name the Clients.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED
1:58

Sensitive content

“Ghislaine Maxwell remains, as of yet, the only woman convicted for trafficking underage victims to absolutely nobody. And that is the fundamental conundrum in the case of the Epstein files. And that is that other than Prince Andrew having been stripped of his title, and Mandelson having to have had to quit the House of Lords and his position in the Labour Party, it doesn’t appear - in the way of punishments - for anyone to have faced anything that could even be described as being close to justice. Keep in mind, and as we’re going to go into in the details of this stream, resignations and public shamings and loss of titles, considering the scale and the implications of the crimes we are talking about, cannot in any way be defined as justice. If we’re discussing, as it appears increasingly to be the case, the international globalist trafficking ring that was trafficking in underage victims for the purposes of acquiring compromise on politicians to sell out the national interests of on behalf of a foreign power, presumably most likely to be Mossad, then we’re talking of not just treason here, we’re also talking, of course, of the crime of underage rape and trafficking, but including, as we’re about to hear in this stream, torture, rape, and so on and so forth. So considering the sheer scale and enormity of the crimes, a resignation here and a stripping of a title there doesn’t feel anywhere near close to justice, especially for those who may have fallen victim to this scheme. So that is the topic for today. Epstein Files Fallout: Name the Clients.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED

أبو عمّار

23,989 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Mehdi Hasan declares the Jeffrey Epstein "conspiracy theory" has been proven "real," because it's finally been proven that Epstein did in fact have "ties to the rich and powerful," as well as to "foreign governments." But... it's been known that Epstein had exactly these "ties" from the literal first moment he gained any public notoriety. Literally, since 2002. The actual Epstein "conspiracy theory" -- now in the process of being memory-holed, amazingly enough -- was of course never merely that Epstein had certain "ties" to "rich and powerful" people, or to representatives of "foreign governments." It was that he was running a vast child-sex trafficking and blackmail operation -- *in concert with* these "rich and powerful people," to whom he had "ties" -- and at the direction of, or in service to, some unknown assemblage of clandestine intelligence agencies. Uh, remember that whole thing about how he was supposedly flying around his VIP friends on the "Lolita Express," or gathering them on "Pedophile Island," so they could rape all the children he'd procured? Then he'd catch them on hidden camera, and use the resulting sexual blackmail to get them to do either his own sinister bidding, or that of his secret intel paymasters? THAT was the fundamental "theory" -- the beating heart of the "Epstein conspiracy," such as there ever was one. And it's been proven resoundingly FALSE -- based on all available evidence, after MILLIONS of new records have now been released. Yet pundits such as Mehdi, who posture as vaguely "anti-establishment," for some reason still feel the need to act like the essential "conspiracy theory" of Epstein has obviously been proven true. They can only do this if they RADICALLY define down why there was ever an "Epstein conspiracy theory" in the first place! Because... it's been proven completely false!

Michael Tracey

31,385 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

It's one thing for Massie and Tucker to engage in wild speculation about Epstein before an audience of millions. Ho hum. But what's really galling here is that Tucker intimates Trump had Epstein "murdered." Tucker then proceeds to misstate basic facts to support his wildly inflammatory intimation. - Contrary to what Tucker states as though it were established fact, Epstein was not "brought back" to the United States from France in July 2019. He flew back on his own accord to Teterboro airport, unaware that he'd been indicted by a Grand Jury and US marshals were waiting to arrest him. - Epstein was not "re-arrested for crimes he'd already been convicted of" in July 2019. Federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York expressly had to concoct a *new* set of crimes to charge Epstein with, so as to circumvent the 2007-2008 federal Non-Prosecution Agreement. Hence, while they charged Epstein for conduct that purportedly took place during the same period that his previous charged offenses were alleged to have taken place -- roughly 2002-2005 -- the 2019 charges included a new federal nexus, by alleging interstate crimes in New York, in addition to Florida. Epstein was federally charged with New York-based offenses for which he was never charged in 2006-2008. - Tucker seems to believe he knows for certain that Epstein was "murdered." That's possible, at least -- but if he's so unwaveringly certain of this, can he please at some point identify the evidence underlying his certainty? I realize most people do not know, and do not necessarily even need to know, these granular details, especially the legal technicalities. But if you're going to intimate that the SITTING PRESIDENT had someone murdered in prison, is it too much to ask that you first have a grasp of the basic facts? Tucker and Massie just don't care.

Michael Tracey

47,252 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Whitney Webb, February 19, 2026: "[Cousin to the Rothschilds Jimmy] Goldsmith and [Robert] Maxwell basically come over [to the U.S.] and engage in these M&As, fronting for the Rothschild family... and then Epstein takes over the portfolio...[and] Evelyn de Rothschild... [was] very, very close to Jeffrey Epstein... And, again, I would argue that, if any family is untouchable, that's one of them. And I doubt investigators would get very far in probing that family." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Clayton Morris (Clayton Morris) and Natali Morris (Natali Morris) posted to the Redacted YouTube channel (Redacted) on February 19, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "But I've argued in my book that, you know, after Maxwell's death, Robert Maxwell's death in 1991, he pops up with Ghislaine in public for the first time and is for all intents and purposes the heir to Robert Maxwell's portfolio. Probably with Israeli intelligence and probably with some of the illicit financial operations that Maxwell was engaged with at the time. "And also his link with some of these organized crime networks I was talking about earlier. But why did Robert Maxwell come to the United States? He made this big entrance the into New York specifically a year or two before he died and brought Ghislaine with him. "And the reason he did that was specifically for the Rothschild banking family. And this is actually in a New York Times article that I reference in my book. I forget the exact title of the article but it's like, 'the Rothchilds' Mega Dealer' or something like that. But if you look it up on the archive dealer is spelled wrong. They switch like the E and the A for some reason, probably to make it harder for you to find. "But, basically, it says that the Rothschild banking dynasty, that at time, which was this article came out in the 1980s, they saw it as an error that they had never properly established a significant foothold on U.S. Wall Street. They had focused instead in Europe and other theaters. "And so in the 1980s, they created a Rothschild entity on Wall Street, and they had it focus on mergers and acquisitions, specifically M&As. And to do so they recorded— and to ensure their success they recruited some corporate raiders that they had a close relationship with from Britain. One of them was Robert Maxwell and the other one was Jimmy Goldsmith, who was a cousin to the Rothschilds and also involved in the same organized crime intelligence link nexus that Robert Maxwell was also tied to, via the Claremont Club, which I discuss in my book. "And Jimmy Goldsmith actually, Epstein was, met a lot of his elite friends in New York even though he's from there but in the elite circle for the first time actually at Jimmy Goldsmith's mansion in the area in the 1970s. Right after coming back from the United Kingdom on a backpacking trip when he dropped out of college, which, I would argue, it all kind of goes back to that crowd. "So Goldsmith and Maxwell basically come over and engage in these M&As, fronting for the Rothschild family specifically and then Epstein takes over the portfolio. And then, we know now, actually, it's been coming out, I think, since, there were new releases, of Epstein information, I think, in the year after my book came out. "So that would be 2023 or so, downstream of the USBI case, when it was settled. Talking about his ties to the de Rothschilds specifically, which is the French side of that banking dynasty. And if you have been paying attention, you would know for some time that Evelyn de Rothschild, in particular, very, very close to Jeffrey Epstein. "She actually wrote a letter to Bill Clinton in 1995. That he should meet Jeffrey Epstein and talk to him about currency stabilization. So this is something that's been going on for a long time. And he's been very involved with this particular family, which, it goes without saying, has extremely deep ties to the state of Israel, for an extremely long period of his career. "And, again, I would argue that, if any family is untouchable, that's one of them. And I doubt investigators would get very far in probing that family."

Sense Receptor

19,473 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten