Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

At what point do we call this hostile government takeover a constitutional crisis? Russell Vought, as budget chief, is democracy’s worst nightmare—and Trump’s path to authoritarianism. “He was so clear to us that he believes that it’s a President’s power to ignore the laws as written, that it’s a... show more

Christopher Webb

141,766 subscribers

16,761 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Candidly Tiff

Candidly Tiffvor 1 Jahr

It isn’t hostile Trump and R’s are giving them the keys

Profilbild von VOZ

VOZvor 1 Jahr

"The Democratic Party's actions had left many U.S. citizens feeling humiliated. Signs of a Trump victory were proclaimed well before Biden withdrew from the race. The voters had had enough." 📝 @KarinaLMariani

Profilbild von Eleanor 🆘️

Eleanor 🆘️vor 1 Jahr

It took Hitler 53 days.

Profilbild von Eleanor 🆘️

Eleanor 🆘️vor 1 Jahr

Trump said "in 4 years you'll never need to vote again".

Profilbild von ͏Charles W. Stotter

͏Charles W. Stottervor 1 Jahr

How about calling it a coup, because that is what it is.

Profilbild von The Enemy From Within 🪷

The Enemy From Within 🪷vor 1 Jahr

@dmp267 At some point, the States and their residents will have to just stop remitting taxes to the Federal Govt. If the checks and balances in the Constitution are no longer binding, and Trump becomes a de facto king, then it becomes a case of taxation without representation.

Profilbild von Komatsu

Komatsuvor 1 Jahr

Non of this is new People, they go way back to 2016, its the Cambridge Analytica Crowd still working together with Trump and GOP to destroy our Government and take it over

Profilbild von Vivian 💙 Democracy 💕🇺🇸 🗽🟰⚖️📚📜🇺🇦

Vivian 💙 Democracy 💕🇺🇸 🗽🟰⚖️📚📜🇺🇦vor 1 Jahr

It was a constitutional crisis from the get-go. We've got a non-violent (so far) coup going on. We all are in a daze.

Profilbild von StPete 🇺🇸🇨🇦🇬🇧🇺🇦🇩🇰🇪🇺🇺🇳

StPete 🇺🇸🇨🇦🇬🇧🇺🇦🇩🇰🇪🇺🇺🇳vor 1 Jahr

@MischellUtter The constitutional crisis started with the faux election of Donald Trump.

Profilbild von Derek Lightfoot

Derek Lightfootvor 1 Jahr

They all think that. And the brain dead chuckle fucks who buy his dogshit flags, fake gold shoes, red hats and Bibles are unknowingly getting skull dragged by Russian/Chinese bots into the fight thinking they are on the popular side of the argument.

Ähnliche Videos

Watch Senator Jeff Merkley as he holds the floor tonight to shine a light on the Republican healthcare crisis and government shutdown.

Watch Senator Jeff Merkley as he holds the floor tonight to shine a light on the Republican healthcare crisis and government shutdown.

Senate Democrats

21,951 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

This President’s ascendence to power is symptomatic of a deeper spiritual crisis that our country faces.

This President’s ascendence to power is symptomatic of a deeper spiritual crisis that our country faces.

Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock

14,101 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨NEW: Now that Biden has blanket pardoned the entire Biden Crime Family as well as the entire corrupt J6 committee — — Sen. Blumenthal says it’s time for a Constitutional Amendment to curb the President’s pardon power.

🚨NEW: Now that Biden has blanket pardoned the entire Biden Crime Family as well as the entire corrupt J6 committee — — Sen. Blumenthal says it’s time for a Constitutional Amendment to curb the President’s pardon power.

Western Lensman

88,576 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

princess’ fighting mindset is what you wanted to have as a leader, it’s relatable that we can be genuinely happy to others, but you can’t ignore the fact that you have to be selfish at some point, it’s a game, it’s important to save her group. #PBBCollab20GulongGulo

princess’ fighting mindset is what you wanted to have as a leader, it’s relatable that we can be genuinely happy to others, but you can’t ignore the fact that you have to be selfish at some point, it’s a game, it’s important to save her group. #PBBCollab20GulongGulo

em

31,805 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🔥🚨It’s actually a terrible and good thing that there will never be another celebrity as big as Michael Jackson again. The power he had is what led us to the problems we have.

🔥🚨It’s actually a terrible and good thing that there will never be another celebrity as big as Michael Jackson again. The power he had is what led us to the problems we have.

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

28,858 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

"I know I will respect the limits of a president’s power" "Look at this, look at what is written here, USA. These are the American weapons that are used to destroy the buildings..."

"I know I will respect the limits of a president’s power" "Look at this, look at what is written here, USA. These are the American weapons that are used to destroy the buildings..."

Saul Staniforth

775,435 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

There is so much at stake in this election, and, ultimately, the question before us is: What kind of country do we want to live in? The beauty of a democracy, as long as we can hold on to it, is that each of us has the power to answer that question.

There is so much at stake in this election, and, ultimately, the question before us is: What kind of country do we want to live in? The beauty of a democracy, as long as we can hold on to it, is that each of us has the power to answer that question.

Kamala Harris

32,989,798 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

MERKLEY: Would I be in the ballpark to say we've already spent at least $50 billion on the war? VOUGHT: I wouldn't want to make a characterization of that at this point MERKLEY: As the most knowledgeable person in the executive branch on the budget, I would expect you to have pretty good numbers on that, so I'm a little disappointed in that answer

MERKLEY: Would I be in the ballpark to say we've already spent at least $50 billion on the war? VOUGHT: I wouldn't want to make a characterization of that at this point MERKLEY: As the most knowledgeable person in the executive branch on the budget, I would expect you to have pretty good numbers on that, so I'm a little disappointed in that answer

Aaron Rupar

243,918 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

No more oil sales to Venezuelan dictator Maduro until he hands over power to the President-elect! It’s that simple. Instead, the White House is sending a terrible message to the rest of the world that we are weak on dictators, even when they ignore signed agreements with the US!

No more oil sales to Venezuelan dictator Maduro until he hands over power to the President-elect! It’s that simple. Instead, the White House is sending a terrible message to the rest of the world that we are weak on dictators, even when they ignore signed agreements with the US!

Rep. María Elvira Salazar

39,406 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

NEWS ALERT: Democrat Richard Blumenthal LIED in his questioning of OMB Director nominee Russ Vought when he claimed the Supreme Court had ruled in 1975 that the Impoundment Control Act (ICA) was constitutional. The Court did no such thing. In fact, the Court SPECIFICALLY wrote in Train v. New York City that “no issues as to the reach or coverage of the Impoundment Act are before us.” Why would Blumenthal lie about this and claim Russ Vought would “defy” a Supreme Court ruling that never happened?? As I have explained elsewhere, Train was confined to a specific statutory scheme at issue and did not address the President’s constitutional impoundment power—the constitutional issue was not even presented in that case. Russ Vought did a superb job in his testimony, including not backing down in his view that the President has the constitutional power to impound and that the ICA is unconstitutional. Blumenthal is flat out lying to claim that Russ’s view is in defiance of Train’s holding. The Supreme Court has NEVER ruled on the constitutionality of the ICA nor on the President’s constitutional power to impound funds. And we have 170 years of Presidents regularly using his impoundment authority to rein in wasteful or constitutionally problematic spending. Appropriations is a legislative act, the power of the purse. The spending power is an executive power and is vested in the President. Would it be constitutional for Congress to mandate that the President spend $100M to investigate and prosecute certain disfavored individuals? Of course it would not be constitutional and the President has the authority to refuse to spend those funds. Likewise, if Congress appropriated $100M to provide aid to a known terror state or international organization, the President has the constitutional authority (in fact duty) to refuse to do send those funds to this terror entity. There are limits to Congress’ authority to require the President to spend funds. The Impoundment Control Act is a terrible law. It turns history on its head by requiring a President to spend every dollar of an appropriation, even if the project can be done for less. It makes an appropriation a floor rather than a ceiling. The ICA is designed to shovel money out the door regardless of whether it’s necessary to a program, and it’s wildly irresponsible for our fiscal health.

NEWS ALERT: Democrat Richard Blumenthal LIED in his questioning of OMB Director nominee Russ Vought when he claimed the Supreme Court had ruled in 1975 that the Impoundment Control Act (ICA) was constitutional. The Court did no such thing. In fact, the Court SPECIFICALLY wrote in Train v. New York City that “no issues as to the reach or coverage of the Impoundment Act are before us.” Why would Blumenthal lie about this and claim Russ Vought would “defy” a Supreme Court ruling that never happened?? As I have explained elsewhere, Train was confined to a specific statutory scheme at issue and did not address the President’s constitutional impoundment power—the constitutional issue was not even presented in that case. Russ Vought did a superb job in his testimony, including not backing down in his view that the President has the constitutional power to impound and that the ICA is unconstitutional. Blumenthal is flat out lying to claim that Russ’s view is in defiance of Train’s holding. The Supreme Court has NEVER ruled on the constitutionality of the ICA nor on the President’s constitutional power to impound funds. And we have 170 years of Presidents regularly using his impoundment authority to rein in wasteful or constitutionally problematic spending. Appropriations is a legislative act, the power of the purse. The spending power is an executive power and is vested in the President. Would it be constitutional for Congress to mandate that the President spend $100M to investigate and prosecute certain disfavored individuals? Of course it would not be constitutional and the President has the authority to refuse to spend those funds. Likewise, if Congress appropriated $100M to provide aid to a known terror state or international organization, the President has the constitutional authority (in fact duty) to refuse to do send those funds to this terror entity. There are limits to Congress’ authority to require the President to spend funds. The Impoundment Control Act is a terrible law. It turns history on its head by requiring a President to spend every dollar of an appropriation, even if the project can be done for less. It makes an appropriation a floor rather than a ceiling. The ICA is designed to shovel money out the door regardless of whether it’s necessary to a program, and it’s wildly irresponsible for our fiscal health.

Mark Paoletta

217,757 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Proud to support Senator Jeff Merkley on the floor today as he sounds the alarm on Trump's creeping authoritarianism. My family fled Nazi Germany. We know a thing or two about what happens next.

Proud to support Senator Jeff Merkley on the floor today as he sounds the alarm on Trump's creeping authoritarianism. My family fled Nazi Germany. We know a thing or two about what happens next.

Ron Wyden

17,967 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Raskin: I’m happy that he acknowledges he has the power to activate the National Guard. That was what he refused to do four and a half years ago when the Capitol and his own VP were under attack by the mob violence he unleashed against us. That was a real emergency. This is not a real emergency This looks to me like an emergency, which is manufactured because of a public relations crisis relating to the Epstein file. He doesn't want to release Epstein file. So he wants everybody to look in another direction.

Raskin: I’m happy that he acknowledges he has the power to activate the National Guard. That was what he refused to do four and a half years ago when the Capitol and his own VP were under attack by the mob violence he unleashed against us. That was a real emergency. This is not a real emergency This looks to me like an emergency, which is manufactured because of a public relations crisis relating to the Epstein file. He doesn't want to release Epstein file. So he wants everybody to look in another direction.

Acyn

139,858 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

He is Amit Shah. He is the Home Minister of India. He is saying, “Vote for us so that we can do border fencing.” He has claimed that TMC is not giving land to the BSF for border fencing. Does he mean to say that he is compromising on national security just because BJP is not in power in West Bengal? Imagine saying this even after running a majority government at the Centre, with full power as the Home Minister. I want to know what he is smoking before giving speeches in Bengal.

He is Amit Shah. He is the Home Minister of India. He is saying, “Vote for us so that we can do border fencing.” He has claimed that TMC is not giving land to the BSF for border fencing. Does he mean to say that he is compromising on national security just because BJP is not in power in West Bengal? Imagine saying this even after running a majority government at the Centre, with full power as the Home Minister. I want to know what he is smoking before giving speeches in Bengal.

Mohit Chauhan

234,525 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Had to share this one that I found on Instagram (I’ll link it below). This dude is the WORST kind of vendor. Not sure how he sells anything. It’s not just the decision to ignore comps, he was just soooo combative too. Nightmare vendor.

Had to share this one that I found on Instagram (I’ll link it below). This dude is the WORST kind of vendor. Not sure how he sells anything. It’s not just the decision to ignore comps, he was just soooo combative too. Nightmare vendor.

Slab Factory Ty

633,610 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

To ignore a looming debt crisis that is driven by social security and medicare is unconscionable. So long as the President is failing to lead on that issue, Republicans should make it clear that they’re open to compassionate and responsible entitlement reforms down the road.

To ignore a looming debt crisis that is driven by social security and medicare is unconscionable. So long as the President is failing to lead on that issue, Republicans should make it clear that they’re open to compassionate and responsible entitlement reforms down the road.

Mike Pence

2,185,743 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

I didn’t expect so many people to still be hostile towards the president at this point as it’s very clear that he saved this country from oblivion, I’m very positive that he’s gonna repair it all because he’s actually a very competent guy

I didn’t expect so many people to still be hostile towards the president at this point as it’s very clear that he saved this country from oblivion, I’m very positive that he’s gonna repair it all because he’s actually a very competent guy

Ansem Edet

11,401 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 The tariff case before SCOTUS is a constitutional test of presidential power. IEEPA was written for moments like this—when hostile nations weaponize our economy. If Trump wins, it reaffirms a president’s right to defend America’s economy. Watch Mornings with Maria:

🚨 The tariff case before SCOTUS is a constitutional test of presidential power. IEEPA was written for moments like this—when hostile nations weaponize our economy. If Trump wins, it reaffirms a president’s right to defend America’s economy. Watch Mornings with Maria:

Mehek Cooke🇺🇸

25,644 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten