Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

#AussieBloke steps out from behind the #Gloryhole to get his nuts licked. #AussieBoy #AAB #Gay4Pay #AussieBJ #BiCuriousGuys #straightbait #Tricked #BigLoad #UncutDick #Str8CuriousGuys #Str8 #GayGloryhole #GloryholeBJ #GayBJ #Tradie

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Blueface's mom and new girlfriend almost scrapped at his welcome home party and the rapper and others had to step in to break it up. On Tuesday night (Dec. 2), Blue and streamer N3on hosted a welcome home party for the rapper in Los Angeles. However, things went left when the rapper's mother, Karlissa Harvey, and girlfriend, Nevaeh Akira, almost threw hands. In one video captured of the incident, Nevaeh walks up behind Karlissa, who responds by turning around and mushing Blue's new GF. Nevaeh goes to retaliate, and several men, including Blueface and Wack 100, step in to stop the altercation before things get all the way out of hand. "That bi**h pushed me," Nevaeh can be heard screaming at people trying to calm her down. Blueface eventually steps in and pulls her away. Karlissa has since commented on the incident via social media. "Now when y'all aww what really happened don't apologize to me just suck the hemorage out my [peach emoji]," she wrote in one post. Karlissa downplayed the dustup and claimed Nevaeh fell into her, which is what caused Karlissa to mistakenly react by pushing her. "Y'all need to stop guessing and assuming," she added. "We had an absolute amazing night after the miscommunication." Blueface's official welcome home party comes a month after he was released from prison on Nov. 3, after serving almost two years behind bars. The Los Angeles rapper's latest relationship comes following a nasty breakup with Hazel-E a week ago.

XXL Magazine

291,438 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

11 years ago today, we got one of the greatest interviews in MMA history. “You’re looking at the current king, Ariel. You’re interviewing the current king…and July 11th the current king will be there raising gold.” Less than two weeks later at UFC 189, during McGregor’s iconic walkout, Joe Rogan put the monumental moment for Ireland into words: “We’ve seen countries get behind their fighters before, but there’s never been anything like this. The Irish people have come out tonight in a way that just defines them as a nation. And this man has incredible weight on his shoulders right now. The pressure that he’s experiencing right now, the hype behind all of this, very few human beings in this world will ever experience anything remotely similar to what’s going on inside the mind and the body of Conor McGregor as he steps into this octagon.” That was the atmosphere surrounding Conor McGregor before and during UFC 189. But Conor’s interview with Ariel Helwani 10 days before fight night, at the UFC x Reebok launch in New York City, will forever be gold. He still didn’t know if Jose Aldo or Chad Mendes would be standing across from him. Conor didn’t care. When Ariel asked about Aldo potentially pulling out, Conor said he didn’t blame him: “If an individual is afraid to fight, you cannot force him. So it is what it is. If he’s running, if he’s scared, there’s nothing I can do…Sometimes I look in the mirror and get a little fright as well looking at myself. I am an absolute animal. A machine. So I probably wouldn’t want to fight me either.” The whole situation was unprecedented. A fighter had just traveled the world on the most intense media tour the sport had ever seen, only to have his championship opponent thrown into uncertainty 10 days out. McGregor embraced the chaos, and walked into UFC 189 with the backing of a country behind him like we’ve never seen before. Now, 11 years later, UFC 329 lands on that exact same date, July 11th. The last time he fought on July 11th, he opened as the slight underdog. By the time the Octagon door closed, he was around a -190 favorite. There are underdogs, and then there’s Conor McGregor, a one-man market mover. 👊🏼: Conor McGregor 🎙️: Ariel Helwani

AFeldmanMMA

62,397 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The “trans” rally in Sheffield against “segregation” yesterday: No matter why the “trans” lunatics thought we went to their “protest” in Sheffield yesterday or how THEY reacted violently - we only went there to hold a suffragette flag and take a photo. I had a dog in one hand and my phone in the other and stood at the back. I did not provoke anyone other than … being me and them hating me. They lost their minds. They were looking out for us. They went nuts when we showed up shouting “they’re HERE! 12.05 are HERE!” and then swarmed LightninLex 🏴 following her in a mob. I was concerned for her safety at this point in the video which is why I’m shouting her name. A very big man pretending to be a woman is part of the mob surrounding her and has a gleeful look on his face as he puts both his arms round her with his big trans flag. She keeps her arms in the air. She did nothing to provoke them even when surrounded. She did not however give in or show fear - because she never does. They will never get that from her. Yet a woman with a baby on her chest who was also crowding in as part of the mob pushing at LightninLex calls me “hateful”. A man who has previously assaulted a TERF woman was right behind following me close. Wearing a Keffiyeh over his face - obviously. These men are very angry at the release of the “code of practice” which promises them a “third space” for their “safety” in changing rooms and toilets away from women - they are looking for women to take that anger out on. The overall message of speeches was “we are coming to get into women’s spaces and we will do it by force if the law tells us no”. They chanted (whilst they had her pinned in their midst) “STAND UP FIGHT BACK”. No one was “fighting” them yesterday. We had a flag. We were two women walking to the Town Hall. All we have done is highlight that risk to women. All they have done is show themselves as violent and worryingly quick to show it. They hate women - specifically women who say no. These men are angry, they will be “fighting” you, they will be violent towards women. #Terfs #sheffield #NoManisAWoman

Jean Hatchet

19,227 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

ANTHROPIC'S PRODUCT CHIEF HAS USED CLAUDE FABLE 5 FOR MONTHS BEFORE ANYONE ELSE. HERE'S WHAT HE LEARNED ABOUT THE MOST POWERFUL MODEL YET Mike Krieger co-founded Instagram and now runs product at Anthropic. He's had Claude Fable 5 for two months before the public, and his takeaway is that it changes how you have to work, not just how much you get done. Here's what stood out, and what to actually do with it 1. It holds the whole project, so stop chopping tasks small. The old habit was breaking work into model-sized pieces and stitching them. Fable keeps the whole thing in context. What to do: stop pre-slicing your prompts into tiny steps. Hand it the full goal and the intent behind it, the way you'd brief a senior engineer, and let it sequence the work itself 2. Delegate big, async, and overnight. He sets it on a hard task at night and wakes to it finished, including the model getting itself unstuck when a service died, scaffolding a workaround, and documenting it. What to do: stop babysitting one prompt at a time. Kick off long jobs and walk away. Run several sessions at once instead of one you watch 3. The skill is planning now, not typing. His day moved to long architecture conversations up front, then execution in chunks. What to do: spend your first prompts planning, not building. Then ask it to output an HTML page or markdown doc of the plan so your team aligns before any code is written. That early alignment is the new leverage 4. Match the effort level to the task. Fable's range is wide, so a heavy reasoning pass on a tiny UI tweak is overkill (and pricey). What to do: dial effort down for small jobs, save the deep thinking for hard ones. And don't use your most expensive model for quick questions, keep a fast model for those 5. Verification is the real bottleneck now. The hard part isn't getting output, it's trusting it. What to do: make every change ship with proof. Have Claude attach a screenshot or video of what it built, so you can see the result instead of reading the diff. Then stand behind the decisions yourself before you merge 6. Cost is per-result, not per-turn. Fable is expensive per call but often one-shots what other models need ten turns to get right. What to do: judge cost by what it takes to finish the task to your satisfaction, not the price of a single message. Give it a real task and see how far it gets before you jump in His bigger point: software engineering isn't over, it's different. The craft moved from writing code to owning intent, taste, and what actually ships. The floor rose so anyone can build, and the ceiling rose so experts go further than before Bookmark this

Yarchi

30,958 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

During the first sneak preview of Norman Jewison's "In the Heat of the Night" (1968) in San Francisco, the audience went nuts. They stamped their feet and laughed. Norman Jewison's heart sank completely when there was a huge wave of laughter during Poitier's signature line in the movie, "They call me Mister Tibbs!". As the movie ended, he walked out of the theater dazed and sorrowful, with Hal Ashby trailing behind him. Jewison thought to himself, “'I had made a film that had a little bit of humor, but not a comedy.' I was devastated. Truly devastated. I said to Hal Ashby, ‘Oh, my God. What have we done here?’” However, Ashby was unfazed. He told Jewison that the audience weren’t laughing at the movie; they were just grooving on the humiliating comeuppance Poitier was handing to Steiger in every scene. He continued, “You don’t understand. They were enjoying the film. They were into it. They get it.” Jewison wondered if the movie needed a major recut; Ashby suggested losing a couple of lines here and there, but nothing more. Jewison returned to Los Angeles with serious misgivings. But he was able to console himself with one reaction. “Even in San Francisco, when we got to the scene where Endicott slaps Tibbs and Tibbs slaps him right back, there was suddenly no sardonic or ironic feeling in the audience. There was a gasp, an intake of breath throughout the theater that was almost palpable. From the white audience and the black audience. They didn’t take that as a joke. And at that moment, I knew we had them.” ("Pictures at a Revolution", Mark Harris, 2008) P.S: Remembering the great Canadian Filmmaker Norman Jewison on his 100th birthday!

DepressedBergman

96,726 просмотров • 15 дней назад

What a fever dream. This season has been absolutely demanding, mentally and physically. There have been so many points where I've just wanted to give up and throw in the towel. It seemed every time we made one step forward, we would take two steps back. The biggest thing that kept me going was the small glimpses here and there. Not many people saw them, but when things were going right, there were glimpses from within our team. We just kept saying if we could get a race to go our way, we would have a career day. Going into the dirt races we knew we would have a good run if we could just finish, but we did more than actually finish, we competed. For the first time this season, we actually felt a part of the upper-pack battle, fighting for the Lucky Dog, trading paint and throwing slide jobs. Attrition always plays a huge part of these races, but rarely are we able to benefit greatly from it. But yesterday was different. We were actually able to find ourselves in the lucky dog spot when we needed it most, got back on the lead lap and kept putting ourselves in a position to succeed. We know we'll have struggles throughout the rest of the season, we know we probably won't have another run like this all season, but for one day, for one race, we can say we felt like we competed. For us, such a small team with such a long history, to be a part of it week in and week out has been an awesome experience all year long and I'm excited to have this entire team behind me. I appreciate every single person that has been with us throughout my career and this awesome journey. It means a lot to see so much support, even through all the lows. It really does a mean a lot to me, and I appreciate it greatly. We're going up to Madison International Speedway this Friday, looking to put together some last second sponsors and help keep the good runs going. Stats/Accomplishment's from yesterdays 7th place finish (in 800+ ARCA Menards Series (Main Series Only) Races since 1984, stats only from when Wayne has fielded his own equipment): My new career best finish Best finish for Wayne Peterson Motorsports since 7th place (-14 laps) at Middle Georgia Raceway in 1984 Only his 10th lead lap finish since 1984 Only his 9th top ten finish since 1984 First lead lap finish for WPM since 2018 First lead lap finish on a track under 2.0 miles since 2015 and only his second ever Highest finishing Ford (I believe only the 2nd time the team has ever been a highest finishing manufacture) Fastest lap by a Ford

Brayton Laster

57,194 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🚨 Jon Bray's RØDE Wireless Microphone Theory VS. Tai Norman's Charlie Kirk: Operation 322 2-Shot Theory ⚠️ It is CRITICAL to understand that Jon Bray INTENTIONALLY left out EXTREMELY IMPORTANT video frames from his final analysis... I challenged him on this months ago. 🔑 He doubled down on his flawed approach. Fast forward to today... Candace Owens, Baron Coleman, Stew Peters, and many others are now starting to parrot the claim that Charlie was blown up by his RØDE microphone. These are our friends. We can't let them go out like this. Nope! We are all a family in this Charlie Kirk investigative community, and when your family is off track you don't just write them off. So I don't want to just write them off, but instead I want to give them a chance to correct the record. This DEBUNKED claim they are all following now was popularized by a fake anonymous Iranian hacker whose video was covered on TPV Sean's channel FIRST. Everything that these top channels are saying now, was said a couple months ago by this fake anonymous Iranian hacker. INTENTIONALLY Planted! Israel intentionally lifted up a debunked and failed theory so that it would take the heat off of itself regarding the traction I was beginning to see. I was getting up to 2,100 followers in one day, and many days with over 1,000 followers. 🙄 Then my brand new account, since October, started getting searched from Israel. Completely wild. All throughout this investigation I have come up with great finds to help to move the narrative forward. And that is exactly what Israel was feeling. They were feeling the pressure, so they responded. I was upset a few months ago that TPV Sean would air what was obviously their Israeli propaganda, but I am thankful that it was captured on video. This was a clear point of physical reference where all of these influencers got their information from... AND NONE OF THEM KNEW THAT THE INFORMATION WAS BUILT AROUND A LIE. They still don't... 🔑 None of the influencers I've listed have actually sat down to do a frame by frame analysis to see if Jon Bray's info actually checks out. I have! 🙋🏾‍♂️ Once you sit down and do the work, it's easy to see that this theory is extremely flawed and lacks any kind of scientific integrity. And once all of the context that Jon conveniently does not consider is factored in, that's when it is easy to see that the RØDE microphone theory is simply implausible. 🔑 Here are just 10 things that independent investigators are NOT considering when they champion that flawed theory... Also, 10 things that are 100% included & well explained in my CKO322 investigation: + Frames of BOTH bullets caught in flight at the time of the assassination. + BOTH bullet entry points with CLEAR definitive evidence of entry. + The INFRARED BEAM on the back of Charlie at the time he was shot. + The DOWNWARD Neck Cavitation + Full impenetrable explanation on the shirt puffing up anomaly, in combination with the raising of the front of the shirt anomaly. + Crack bang analysis showing the loud shots sound coming from Charlie's rear right. + Muzzle flash reflection seen in the window behind Charlie at the time of the rear shot. + The PRESSURIZED BULLET HOLE in the middle of Charlie's FREEDOM T-Shirt front center mass. + Dan Flood. I clearly show his hand signals and what the results of those signals became. When we see Dan Flood do his hand signals, his body steps back slightly as he ever so lightly leans into the sunlight to give the signal. This body movement was a SUBCONSCIOUS error while giving the go-ahead for the shot from Charlie's right. This small SLIGHT error is EXACTLY what I caught and highlighted in my CKO322 series. This was a operational mishap that was never meant to happen! + Rick Cutler. The recoil, bullet, bow shock swirl, and so much MORE. 🔑 GET READY!! I'm producing another video to add to my 8 hour CKO332 investigative series on YouTube. YOU DON'T WANT TO MISS THIS! STAY TUNED!! 🫡🙏🏾🇺🇸

WeAreNotGoingToMars

154,182 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

💥🔎 Alexander Volkanovski, in the most delicate way possible, explains why he believes Diego Lopes has low fight IQ and weak footwork He says Lopes still hasn’t learned how to cut off the cage from both sides, fight effectively as the aggressor, or properly understand distance. “In camp, we were sure his team would work on how to cut off the cage. But you can cut off the cage the wrong way — for example, if you step in too close, you walk straight into my shots. Obviously, I knew I probably wouldn’t be able to circle only one way the whole time, so I thought he’d prepare better to cut me off from both sides. But as soon as I started circling to the right like in the first fight, he got excited — ‘Aha!’ — and immediately tried to cut me off. So I simply switched directions and started moving left. And suddenly there it was — my exit was wide open (laughs). He couldn’t cut me off from there. I could turn freely and get out. I didn’t even have to take risks. I kept turning him from side to side, and whenever he got too aggressive, I punished him. Yeah, he’s good — but maybe he needs more IQ, more footwork, more understanding. People said he was going to cut me off — sure, but would he do it correctly? If you cut too aggressively, you walk into even harder shots. He wasn’t cutting me off properly — he just stepped straight into the angle and ran into my right hand. And even if you do cut me off, I’ve got so many layers in my footwork, so many defensive layers. Honestly, I almost feel bad for him because I’m probably the worst matchup for him. And not enough time had passed since the first fight for him to truly prepare. When he came forward as the aggressor, he wasn’t in position. He was blitzing, forcing it, trying to cut me off — and I kept countering him with heavy shots. Cutting the cage correctly is an art. He was chasing me, which made it hard for him to structure his offense. I kept turning him. He’d end up square [both toes pointing forward], thinking we were about to trade — and I’d already be gone. I kept turning him and hitting him when his feet weren’t set, before he was ready to throw. It’s like he’s used to hitting pads — the target stands in front of you, you throw, it steps back, resets, and you throw again. But when you’re cutting off the cage, your feet have to be underneath you. He talked a lot about how much he improved since our first fight, how everything got better. Against Jean Silva he looked great — the wrestling helped him win easily. But when it came to using IQ, footwork, understanding… It felt like someone just gave him a basic plan — be patient, use the jab — but there was no real strategy behind it. Okay, you’ll be patient and throw a jab, but you still don’t understand distance or footwork. He didn’t get better since the first fight. I didn’t see any growth.” 🎥 Demetrious Johnson

Home of Fight

357,919 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Natalya Murakhver, co-founder of Restore Childhood, tells me what happened when she met with Randi Weingarten, head of the American Federation of Teachers, back in 2022 and asked her to use her influence at the CDC to remove the masking mandates for school children: “I reached out to Randy Weingarten in the fall of 2022 because I saw that she was receptive to speaking with parents and engaging with parents, and I knew that she had a say in CDC reopening guidelines. At that point, the New York Post and Fox had broken the story that Randy and the teachers unions had crafted the school reopening guidelines, which up until then, parents certainly didn't know. So it was surprising. I had hoped that there was some good faith in those guidelines, and she was coming to it with an open heart. And so I reached out to her on X (Twitter at that point)…and said: ‘Could we meet at some point? I'd love to speak with you. My children are suffering in school with masks on, and I've done the research. There's no research supporting the safety and efficacy of masks. We need to get the kids back to normal.’ And she said yes, and we met on marathon Sunday in November 2022, on the Upper West Side for drinks. And it was very pleasant. We had a good conversation, and I asked her if she would talk to the CDC. It's kind of ludicrous to tell the story. I can't even believe that we had this conversation. I said: ‘I know that you have a say in what the CDC does. Can you talk to them about revising their guidelines and getting these kids back to normal? They need to be able to see each other's faces.’ And she said: ‘You know what, Natalya, if you present an outline for how to unmask the kids, I will present it to the CDC, and we'll see what we can do.’ Shocking. I, an Upper West Side mom without a medical degree… I mean, what am I going to present to her? I wanted her to remove the masks, but I guess now I need to go through the steps, because I've been given an opportunity to have a say in policy. So the first thing I did was I called Tracy Hogue, who was a researcher in the Bay area at the time, and friend, and I said: “Tracy, Randy Weingarten is willing to present our proposal to unmask the kids. I need research.” And Tracy is a dual citizen between the United States, and Denmark, speaks five languages, is really just a brilliant researcher, and she just laughed and said: ‘Of course, I'll work with you on this, but there's no proposal. If we give them an off ramp, we're going to have an on ramp. There's no research behind masking kids. Just take them off.’ So we worked together for a few months and figured out that there was a toolkit that another virologist had developed on the west coast for his own kids’ school about the benefits and harms of masking and the mental health issues that were developing in kids that he was seeing in his own children. And we ended up taking that toolkit and creating something called ‘Urgency of Normal’ which was released in January…and it was a toolkit for parents, not for the teachers unions. We realized there was nothing for us to present to Randy and the CDC. We needed to give the parents access to the data and to the stories so that they could advocate on their own local levels. And we wrote op-eds. We had multiple doctors, including Vinay Prasad, Monica Gandhi, Lucy McBride, big name doctors who signed on to it. We did a zoom call that had over 1000 parents from around the country, which is great considering we didn't have a budget…Parents would reach out to us from all over the world, not just the United States. I'd get emails from everywhere. And then eventually that led to me forming ‘Restore Childhood,’ a nonprofit that produced the film.” Natalya Murakhver

Jan Jekielek

12,766 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

OP-ED : The Notwithstanding Clause Is How We Save Canada—from the People Who Broke It If you listen to the Canadian media—most of whom could be replaced by cardboard cutouts of Mark Carney—you’d think Pierre Poilievre is preparing to burn the Charter of Rights and Freedoms on the front steps of Parliament. He’s been accused of authoritarianism, of threatening democracy, even of “undermining the rule of law.” What’s his crime? He wants to use a constitutional tool—the Notwithstanding Clause—to stop mass murderers from gaming the parole system and walking free. Let’s back up, because this isn’t hysteria. This is strategy. And it starts with a court decision. In 2022, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in R v. Bissonnette that judges can no longer impose consecutive parole ineligibility periods on people convicted of multiple murders. Their logic? It violated Section 12 of the Charter—protection against “cruel and unusual punishment.” Under this ruling, someone who murders six people can apply for parole after 25 years, the same as someone who murdered one. Let’s be clear: that wasn’t a fluke. It wasn’t a clerical error. It was a judicial statement that mass murder should not carry a heavier penalty than single homicide. It’s insane. And it’s now the law. Poilievre has said plainly what most Canadians are thinking: no more. His platform includes restoring consecutive parole ineligibility for multiple murderers—using Section 33 of the Charter, the Notwithstanding Clause, to override the Supreme Court's ruling. That clause, by the way, wasn’t invented by some right-wing populist—it was authored during the patriation of the Constitution by Allan Blakeney, Peter Lougheed, and, yes, Pierre Elliott Trudeau himself. It was written to give elected governments the final word when courts lose the plot. So when Liberal insiders like Mark Carney call Poilievre’s move “dangerous,” let’s be honest about what they’re really saying. They're not worried about your rights. They're worried about their power. Let’s talk about Carney. Carney is the Liberal establishment personified. A man who has never been elected to anything, but acts like the nation owes him its premiership. A former central banker, an unelected global bureaucrat, a Davos man through and through. And now, the man parachuted in by the Liberal Party to rescue it from the wreckage of Justin Trudeau. Mark Carney says the use of the Notwithstanding Clause in this case is a “threat to democracy.” This is the same Mark Carney who, in 2022, wrote an op-ed in The Globe and Mail calling the Freedom Convoy “sedition.” He supported the invocation of the Emergencies Act against peaceful protestors. He said, “You can’t have liberty without order,” as Trudeau’s government froze bank accounts without charges or trials, targeted working-class Canadians, and abused financial institutions to silence dissent. You want to talk about civil liberties? That was the real violation. Carney didn’t object to that. He didn’t call it “dangerous.” He supported it. And he supports Bills C-11 and C-18, which hand the federal government the power to control what Canadians see, post, and share online. These are the Trudeau government’s censorship bills—sold as “support for Canadian content,” but in reality, giving the CRTC the authority to prioritize or bury content based on government-set criteria. Censorship? Government-controlled financial punishment? Total silence when bail laws are gutted and criminals walk free? Mark Carney has no problem with any of that. But when Pierre Poilievre wants to keep Paul Bernardo—a man who raped, tortured, and murdered teenage girls—from applying for parole every two years, now it’s a civil liberties emergency? Let’s be clear: Paul Bernardo is not some abstract example. He’s not theoretical. He’s a real person, a real monster. His crimes are so depraved they defy description. He was sentenced to life in prison for the murders of Leslie Mahaffy and Kristen French, and he was behind the “Scarborough Rapist” attacks on at least 14 other women. And yet, under Canada’s current law, he gets to apply for parole every two years. The families of his victims are forced to prepare victim impact statements and re-live the trauma again and again. That’s the system the Liberals built. That’s the legacy Poilievre wants to overturn. And they’re terrified, because with one constitutional stroke—one Notwithstanding Clause—he can. He can restore sentences that reflect justice. He can return power from unelected judges to elected lawmakers. He can protect victims instead of appeasing criminals. And most dangerously—for them—he can show Canadians that this decaying, dysfunctional, upside-down system can actually be fixed. That’s why they’re panicking. Because Poilievre isn’t threatening the rule of law. He’s threatening the rule of them. The Notwithstanding Clause doesn’t destroy democracy. It saves it. It gives voice to the people when institutions lose sight of the public interest. It exists for moments like this—when killers get a second chance and victims don’t. So when Carney and his media allies start foaming at the mouth over “tyranny,” remember this: it’s not about rights. It’s about the swamp defending itself. Because once Canadians realize the Notwithstanding Clause can be used to take back their streets, their justice system, and their country from people like Mark Carney, they’ll wonder why it wasn’t used sooner. This election, Canadians are being handed a rare opportunity—not just to vote for a different government, but to reclaim the country from the institutions and elites who hollowed it out. For years, the Liberals have ruled through back channels: unelected judges, unaccountable regulators, international bankers like Mark Carney. They’ve told you crime is compassion, censorship is safety, and freedom is dangerous. And if you dared to disagree, they froze your bank account and silenced your voice. Now, with the Notwithstanding Clause, Pierre Poilievre is threatening to unwind it all. Not with riots. Not with chaos. With a legal tool, written into the Constitution by the very people now pretending it’s a threat. He’s not dismantling democracy. He’s using it. He’s not a danger to the country. He’s the first serious chance to save it. Because if we don’t have the right to keep mass murderers in prison… If we don’t have the right to protect our kids, our streets, and our speech… Then what do we really have left? Canada is at a crossroads. One path leads to more decay, more lies, and more of the same. The other leads out of the swamp. You know the path. You know who’s on it. And you know exactly who to vote for.

Dan Knight

21,237 просмотров • 1 год назад

While the world doomscrolls 15-second TikToks and loses its attention span.. YOU SHOULD CHECK OUT THIS NEW REPO A Chinese college kid built MiroFish in just 10 days, scored $4M funding and ByteDance just dropped the upgrade that turns it into a prediction monster. Fourth-year student Guo Hanjiang vibe coded MiroFish: thousands of autonomous AI agents simulating entire societies in real time. See the details in the post below. Feed it any news, report, or historical data - watch markets, crowds, and politics react exactly as they would. GitHub went nuclear, he scored $4M funding from Shanda Group, and Polymarket traders are already printing +$120k+ using his SPX and event simulations. But long runs had one fatal flaw: agents got amnesia, hallucinations, and context overload. Classic RAG garbage. Now the same company behind TikTok (via VolcEngine) just open-sourced the fix: OpenViking - already at 11.6k+ stars on GitHub. Repo: It turns chaotic memory into a clean, structured filesystem: -> viking://user/memories/ (your habits + past outcomes) -> viking://agent/skills/ (trading and analysis superpowers) Smart 3-layer hierarchy: .L0 - 100-token ultra-summary .L1 - quick overview .L2 - full details (opened only when needed) Agents browse folders intelligently instead of dumping everything. Result: > No more forgetting crucial facts from the start of a simulation > Way fewer hallucinations > Massive API token savings > Self-updating memory - agents get smarter after every run MiroFish + OpenViking = absolute nuclear edge for Polymarket and event prediction. I will use it for my private bot. Thousands of agents now run with perfect long-term memory, stay sharp for 100+ steps, and deliver hyper-accurate probabilities. This combo is about to change the game for anyone trading predictions. The irony is insane: the company that killed human attention with short videos just gave AI agents eternal, structured, self-evolving memory. Who’s already running this combo on Polymarket? Save this. The real alpha just dropped.

slash1s

293,591 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

I had a major fanboying moment just now!! For years, I’ve followed this hilarious TikTok account called Accidental Talmudist. The man behind the brand is a guy named Salvador Litvak aka “Sal”. I knew nothing about him other than his hilarious content, mostly good Jewish humor. Anyway, I always loved his stuff but we never connected. Until this week. Long story short, we just had a zoom meeting to discuss his new project that you absolutely need to know about, but hang on; I’m getting ahead of myself here. Why is he called The Accidental Talmudist? I always wondered about that. Listen to this!! Many years ago after growing up as a non religious Jew, Sal discovered Judaism. He had heard of the Talmud but every time he saw a Talmudic book on the shelves of a bookstore, he was intimidated and walked away without opening or buying the book. This went on for years. Then one day, he was at the book store and found himself again looking at the Talmud and again, he began to walk away. Then a voice inside of him said, “It’s just a book. Go find the first one of the series, read it, and get over your fear.” So that’s exactly what he did, he purchased the first tractate of the Talmud, the tractate of Brochos. What happened next is absolutely wild! He walked up to the counter to pay for the book, and the man behind the counter looked at the book and said to him, “Oh, you’re learning Daf Yomi?” He replied “What is daf yomi?” The man proceeded to explain to Sal that Daf Yomi is a global movement in which Jews around the world study one page of Talmud every day. The man then looked at him and said, “Today is day one of the cycle.” Clearly that was no coincidence and Sal was meant to be studying the Talmud. Well, fast forward seven years and he completes the entire Talmud. Now? He teaches Daf Yomi! Oh, you thought that was the most interesting part? Cute, not even close. Sal began his career as a lawyer but that didn’t last long. He moved to LA for film school decades ago and has since been producing and directing films with some of the biggest names in the industry. That’s right, an observant Jew directing movies in Hollywood. Still not the most interesting part. Sal and his wife Nina write the movies together and he then produces and directs them! This man who started out as a secular Jew who went to law school ended up being a deeply observant Jew producing Hollywood movies while also becoming a MASSIVE online influencer with millions of followers. So we had this zoom just now for me to hear about his new project, a movie opening tonight in over 70 cities across America. It’s called Guns & Moses. Sorry, I’m a sucker for a good pun. This movie is a thriller that combines so many different topics you’ll never find in any other movie. Some of the topics include Judaism, antisemitism, the 2nd amendment, and the list goes on. It is most definitely not your typical Hollywood movie!! He sent me a private screening so I can watch it, which I’m super excited to do. Here’s some more info on the movie and some quotes from people who have seen it. Guns & Moses is an edge-of-your-seat thriller about a Chabad rabbi who steps up to defend his community and becomes an action hero. A beloved, small-town rabbi who becomes an unlikely gunfighter after his community is violently attacked. Featuring a star-studded cast including Mark Feuerstein, Neal McDonough, Alona Tal, Christopher Lloyd and Dermot Mulroney. “Our goal was to make a Hollywood-quality film that would be a kiddush Hashem. And according to the buzz, we’ve succeeded. Twenty major publications have done pre-release stories about Guns & Moses, more are coming every day, it’s already being called the “surprise genre hit of the summer.” If all of that wasn’t interesting and inspiring enough, listen to this! As they were making this movie, Sal had a moment of doubt. He turned to Hashem and asked Him for a sign that he was on the right path and that they should keep going! At that moment, he got a call telling him that they just received a $500K tax incentive grant from the state of California, something that usually goes to big budget studio movies. So why did they get this grant? Sit down for this. They got it because a non-Jewish woman film commission in Sacramento respected that Sal is Sabbath observant. Yes. For real. True story. Sal is the first director in 100+ years of Hollywood history (dominated by Jews) to be shomer Shabbos. Unprecedented in Hollywood, the movie filmed Sun-Thurs instead of Mon-Fri, and the director had kosher food brought to him on set. Incredible stuff. Here are some quotes about the movie! “In a time when Jewish communities around the world are grappling with fear, grief, and rising hatred, Guns and Moses gives us a rare cinematic figure: an old-school hero shaped not by vengeance, but by faith and moral clarity. Rabbi Mo may wear a black fedora and long coat, but what makes him iconic isn’t the look—it’s his refusal to abandon compassion, even in the face of terror. - Film Review, Solzy at the Movies “'Guns & Moses' isn’t just a movie with a powerful message – it’s also a thriller that keeps you on the edge of your seat.” - Aish “In their latest film, Salvador and Nina Litvak created a brave and stereotype-defying Orthodox Jewish hero: A gunslinging Chabad rabbi… It’s a first for Hollywood… A hero unlike any other that’s been seen on screen…” - Jewish Journal "In a world that’s getting more dangerous by the minute and a media landscape too squeamish to tackle faith, violence, and identity without neutering the message, Guns & Moses doesn’t just aim—it fires... this indie thriller might be the most surprising genre breakout of the year.” - Film Threat You can check the website to learn more and purchase tickets right now. The movie is hitting theaters tonight! Go watch it and make sure they have a strong opening weekend!!

Hillel Fuld

12,798 просмотров • 1 год назад

Farage and the suckers I used to regularly socialise with a group, one of whose number was a financial lawyer. He used to tell us about something that was surprisingly common in his line of work. He would be called in to give advice because someone wanted to spend their life savings on a scheme that was an obvious scam. He said that 99% of the time they could not be talked out of it. Nothing and nobody could persuade them not to do it, because they were convinced that a fortune was there to be made, and they were desperate to pour as much money as they could into the scheme. They would get really angry with anyone (like a spouse, or other family, or friends) who tried to stop them. Why are you stopping me from making a fortune, they would say. “You're ruining my chance of living the life of my dreams,” was their view. This was meant to happen. This was the life they deserved, which had been so cruelly denied to them for so long. Finally reality was going to turn around and favour them for a change. It was the “Shut up and take my money” meme in real life. It wasn’t that they didn't understand about scams. Yes, scams happen, they knew that, but they don’t happen to me. (That, at least, was my friend’s summation of their thinking based on talking to them.) They could barely take seriously the idea that they were a gullible fool who was being tricked. When obvious problems and flaws with the scheme were pointed out, they would come up with far-fetched and implausible explanations to wave the problems away. Any explanation would do, as long as it meant they didn’t have to wake up from the dream. In almost every case the person concerned decided to put their money into the scheme. Hardly anyone decided not to. In every single case they lost all the money. In every one of these cases the mark was completely shocked and stunned when it happened. They never saw it coming, despite so many people around them telling them it was a con. I bring this up because the situation with Nigel Farage is similar. People are desperate to believe that he is going to save the country. I don't blame them for being desperate. The situation *is* desperate. But that means that many people will cling onto anything which is presented to them as the solution. Farage, they are told by the media, is the big, bad anti-immigration, anti-green, anti-PC man. Great, they think. If the media doesn't like him, then he’s the man for me. I'm also against those things. So they buy into him, big time, without a proper examination. Look, they say, he was Mr Anti-EU for decades. He’s Mr Brexit. He released that poster during the Brexit campaign depicting a long line of foreigners trying to get into Britain. The hated MSM attacks him for being anti-immigration, etc. So how can you lose if you trust him? Life will become good again if we all just support Nigel. Sink your emotional life-savings into him, and watch the results pour in once he gets power. So when you tell them to read Farage’s fine-print, like the Reform manifesto (digging into what slogans like “Net Zero immigration” actually mean), or particular things he has publicly said over the years, and what many people who have worked with him say about him, they act exactly like those people who are advised not to invest their life savings into a get-rich-quick scheme. They get angry and offended. Why are you trying to take away my dream of a better life for me, and a better Britain for all of us? Why are you undermining the only man who stands any chance of transforming the country for us, and preventing my life from getting worse and worse? You’re just trying to ruin everything. You’re just a negative Nelly, who is too afraid to take a risk. Maybe you even support Labour, really. And so on. When asked to explain why it is that Farage’s actual positions, and his track record, indicate that he is not remotely the hard-liner they think he is, they act like the wannabe investors who will come up with any excuse, no matter how implausible, to preserve the dream. I know, I've seen many of them in my comments doing this. “He has to pretend to be more mainstream and mild than he really is in order that he doesn’t get bad MSM headlines” is the gist of it. “The BBC would tear him apart and his support would vanish overnight if he said anything stronger at this stage,” they say. In other words, “he has to get his party into a stronger position before he can say anything that might seem radical.” Apparently being neck-and-neck with Labour and the Conservatives in the polls, having MPs in Parliament, facing rival parties that are collapsing in unprecedented fashion for their adherence to the established ways, having the media hang on your every word, and facing a country crying out for a change in your supposed direction, isn’t a strong enough position for you to lay out your real agenda. You’ve still got to be timid and pretend to differ only slightly from the Conservative Party, lest the British people say, “Reducing mass immigration back to the levels they were in 2000 frightens me, who will cook our kebabs? I’m going to go back to the Tories/Labour/LibDems.” So it’s quite reasonable, apparently, for Farage to delay saying what he really thinks until 2034. Or 2039. Until then, we’ll just twiddle our thumbs and trust him with our support. It never occurs to them as a serious possibility that maybe Farage isn’t “hiding his real power levels,” but just isn’t very radical. In fact, his whole history indicates that not only does he have no interest in supporting robust anti-immigrationism, he is actively opposed to it. He left UKIP because he thought UKIP people were too concerned with Islamic immigration. When he was in charge of UKIP it worked with the intelligence services to weed out anyone who didn’t want Britain being filled up with foreigners. All his public statements going back thirty years indicate that he is a liberal, supply-side Thatcherite, who repudiates nationalism, unless it’s anodyne, flag-waving, Union-Jack-biscuit-tin civic nationalism, where anyone who can vaguely adopt some British cliches (cricket, tea, old Jags, etc.) gets a passport. If he’s playing a game to fool the media, it’s a game that goes back a long, long way. Where is the actual evidence, then, that shows that he is in any way a nativist? What reason is there to believe that he is really is a blood-and-soil nationalist who will suddenly reveal, once in power, his determination to remigrate millions of foreigners, when he’s spent his whole life urging against this? There is no reason to believe this at all, other than people’s desperation to search for a Messiah figure, and the fact that the media (and various hysterical left-wingers) give people the impression that this is Farage’s plan. But they have no evidence for this either, and anyway, why would the media give airtime to someone who genuinely thought this? Wouldn't that devious and tricksy ol’ MSM be more likely to give airtime to someone who was actually rather liberal when it comes down to it, but who can be made to seem like an attractive, anti-establishment rebel, while simultaneously sidelining the real rebels? It's like when the people who want to give away their life savings are shown the long history of bankruptcies that their Svengali has left behind, and they excuse it by saying something like, “Oh, that’s because he never had enough financial support from people. But thanks to me, I can finally give him the money he needs to succeed.” Or whatever excuse they kid themselves with. When asked, “But what evidence is there that he can make you money?”, they reply, “He’s told me his plan, and swears it will work, and it sounds good to me. Look, the rate of return is amazing, I can't pass that chance up, don’t look a gift horse in the mouth,” and so on. Farage also has a glib, charismatic manner, and is very good at talking in general-enough language that people can read into it what they like. “People on the streets have been talking to me, and they've had enough,” he kept saying during the summer 2024 election campaign, but he was rather vague about what exactly they were fed up with, and even vaguer about what he proposed to do about it, which allowed the sucker, er, supporter to decide that Farage was talking about just the very things the supporter thinks are important, and had in mind the same solutions. The media will admit, though, when it thinks the average Joe isn’t listening, that Farage isn’t anywhere near as bad as they normally make him out to be. This is what’s going on in this video clip of Michael Crick, which was from Times Radio, which the average Joe doesn’t listen to. The point of Crick admitting this is to calm down any naive liberals or leftists who are starting to froth at the mouth at the prospect of Farage getting anywhere. (“Look, we don't like him, but we can live with him, he's tamer than you think, better him than some genuine nationalist party.”) I haven't even talked about the idiocy of thinking that Reform’s support would plummet overnight instead of rising (or at least staying roughly the same) if they started talking tougher. (The Telegraph’s pet hamster Tim Stanley hysterically claimed recently that if Reform decided to do this they would lose 10,000 votes for every “far-Right” voter they courted.) I haven’t said anything about how an anti-establishment party must of necessity drive changes in stateable public opinion, rather than accept the status quo. Nor have I talked about the foolishness of trusting a party that you think is cowardly and constantly lying. Or the problem of how rational it is to believe that a timid party, that said for years that it definitely won't do X, Y and Z, will be capable of doing X, Y and Z when it gets power, especially seeing as it will face the real wrath of the establishment at that point. These are all legitimate topics for discussion, but in this article I have been mainly concerned with the parallels with the self-deluding life-savings investor. The conman doesn’t need that many suckers to be a success. He just needs a few. Similarly, Farage doesn’t need that many people to fall for his shtick. With the other big parties’ support in free fall, he can set Reform up as the rebel outsider party for years on the back of a minority of votes, without ever having to make any hard choices, or commit to any positions which will genuinely set the establishment against him. He also has an advantage over the traditional conman, who operates on the margins and in the shadows, of having the media there to endorse him as the “official” rebel. Their every warning makes him seem more attractive to the dissatisfied: “Don’t vote for that Farage, don’t you know he’s anti-immigration and anti-Net Zero? He’s a maverick who doesn’t do what he’s told.” No wonder Reform’s membership numbers are going through the roof. When one person loses their head to a charismatic phony it’s a private tragedy. When enough voters lose their heads to a political phony, who’s taking away the oxygen that a real opposition needs, it’s a public tragedy. So I say, keep your political life savings in a box under your bed for now. And if you must spend some or all of it on Farage, be demanding. Keep all your receipts, note what he says and doesn’t say, and demand that he clearly articulates the feelings of the people he claims to represent. Don’t let him fob you off with vague and airy platitudes. He’s not Barack Obama. He’s your rebel, so make him speak for you, and if he won’t, find someone else who will.

Hector Drummond

34,408 просмотров • 1 год назад

"I'm not sure that we need the dog whistle at this point. And maybe there are ways to re-create it." ~Nolan "There might be a day when Skywatcher doesn't need to exist." ~Nolan "If I had been running the whole show, nobody would even know what Skywatcher is right now." ~Nolan ~My comments in ( )~ Garry P. Nolan: "We've got a lot of data from multiple alleged sightings, both radar and other kinds of data. First it was about getting the raw-data files all put in one place because some of the data was collected by James (Fowler) before there was, officially, kind of a Skywatcher. "And so, getting that data, getting the instrument names that he used for those, then getting the technical manuals of what the settings might be and how much of that information is collected in the metadata when you're collecting the thing... All of this is just the organization that you need to do before you do anything else. "And then, getting from the companies how it is that they parse their raw data. Because some of these data files are put into...I wouldn't call them encrypted, but they're stacked into a certain kind of file structure - and I've seen the file structure - which is, you can think of it as a giant spreadsheet with headings and numbers for each of the columns and time on the row axis. "And so, you know, we've started looking at some of the data and put it into, let's say, 3D tracking. And it's clear that there are some things about the data that we needed to go back to the vendor who makes the instrument and say, 'Why is this and this and this happening, you know, every few dozen milliseconds?'" (I wonder if some of what they saw in their data, and labelled as anomalous, has maybe turned out to be a sensor artifact?) Nolan: "And so, you know, just getting an answer from these companies, often, when you don't even own the instrument, they're like, 'Well, why should we give you the information about how our data is constructed? How do we know that you're not a competitor?' Right? I mean, and so these are the kinds of things that we then contact somebody who has a behind-the-scenes access to this so that we can, again, it's all of these little steps. "And I'm sure there's somebody who's gonna tweet, 'Well, why don't you just put all the raw data out on the internet?' For exactly the same reason you don't put the raw data from ancient DNA sequencing. Because people will make mistakes about it. And so, if I'm going to be involved, I'm not gonna make any mistakes like that. So I'm sorry if people want stuff early. "I think you know, perhaps, if... Well, if I had been running the whole show, nobody would even know what Skywatcher is right now. We'd just be collecting the data in a fully-stealthed mode. And...but, you know, it's...there's reasons, good reasons, why they wanted some publicity. And, you know, but I don't always get my way." Vinnie - 𝐕𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐞 𝐀𝐝𝐚𝐦𝐬 𝕏: "Would you say that the data is exciting?" Nolan: "Oh, there's some interesting stuff in there. I mean, frankly, perhaps some of the better data that we have is just a couple of pictures from the ground of the helicopter with something about, you know, 200 feet in front of it. It's a clear blue sky and there's an object right in front of the helicopter. And the people in the helicopter said at the time that they couldn't see anything, even though we could see it from the ground. "But meanwhile, all of their instruments are going haywire. So, there was an effect. So why couldn't they see it? Maybe it was just out of view? Who knows? So it wasn't a lens flare, and it certainly wasn't a seagull. Mick (both laugh)." Vinnie: "Not in the desert anyway." Nolan: "I can't help myself." Vinnie: "I'm all for it. I'm sure Mick would, too. Hopefully. You know, James Fowler, we know he's left and moved on working with a new company. You know, all the best to him. Am I right in saying some of the technology being utilized by Skywatcher was proprietary to him, specifically? Maybe the dog whistle even? Is that still going to be able to be used by Skywatcher? How's that going to look going forward?" Nolan: "Umm, I'm not sure that we need the dog whistle at this point. And maybe there are ways to recreate it. I'm not party to the discussions around that. And so, we'll see where that goes." (That sounds like Fowler is NOT going to allow Skywatcher to use the dog whistle. That's a big disappointment. I mean, if this is really NHI and the dog whistle works 100% of the time, as claimed, then the whole world deserves to know about it.) Nolan: "I mean, James is not like, gone and forgotten. I mean, I could Signal chat him right now. And so he's there to help us. But, you know, my take on things is, you know, James has a life to live and a family to feed, and maybe his focus isn't entirely on UAP. He certainly has an interest in it. And maybe he has, you know, a company to build, and an opportunity that, actually, we all see now in terms of detecting drones. And, you know, if he wants to run a company like that then running around with a bunch of UAPologists might not be to that benefit. "And there might be a day when Skywatcher doesn't need to exist. The whole idea of Skywatcher is to show that something like this can be done, and it can be done in a serious way." (jakebarber claimed that they could BRING DOWN a craft. If that's true, it would change the world. What happened with that? Barber also said, "Who is operating [UAP]? How are they being operated? Where are they coming from? We should be able to answer those questions, probably entirely, in the next 12 months." Time is running out. Does he still stand behind that? Full Barber post with video clip: ) ~ Nolan: "I mean, I would...I, frankly, hope that if UAPDA - Disclosure Act is passed, because then the information that can be allowed to be out can be let out, and the stuff that needs to be kept secret stays secret. Again, I'm not, I would never advocate for a data dump." (I would 100% advocate for a data dump, minus details on anything that can be used as a weapon. Nobody, including the USG or private contractors owns this information. If it's gonna be a slow drip, for decades, then I fully support an Edward Snowden-type of leaker.) Nolan: "And so, you know, call it controlled disclosure, what have you. It needs to be done the proper way. And, you know, if any of the claims are true, there are reasons why you want to be methodical about it." (Who gets to decide what "the proper way" looks like? It seems like we're having more gatekeeping on top of the original gatekeeping. Not good.)

Joe Murgia

32,437 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: NASA's Lead Electrostatics Scientist claims he’s discovered a “new force” that counteracts gravity with no fuel necessary. Dr. Charles Buhler has run 2,000 vacuum chamber experiments showing a propellantless thrust force that persists after the power is switched off, and cannot be explained by ion wind, magnetic effects, or classical energy conservation. The input is pure electricity and the output is millinewtons of thrust counteracting gravity. He believes his work vindicates the legacy of midcentury antigravity pioneer Thomas Townsend Brown and will lead to a new paradigm of propellantless deep space travel that transcends chemical combustion rockets🚨 Charles Buhler has a PhD in condensed matter physics from Florida State University, spent over two decades at NASA's Electrostatics and Surface Physics Laboratory at Kennedy Space Center (which he now leads), and is the incoming president of the Electrostatic Society of America. He is NASA’s authority on electrostatics. His colleague Andrew Aurigema, a 35-year veteran engineer working from the Townsend Brown electrogravitics lineage, developed a parallel version of the same experiment independently, and the two discovered each other through a mutual colleague who had been watching both of them work in silence for years. Together, under their company Exodus Propulsion Technologies, they have tested nearly 2,000 variations of what they believe is a previously undocumented force. He’s also developed a quantum electrodynamics based theory to explain his results. Buhler’s patent is now under formal examination by the U.S. Patent Office with affidavit-signing witnesses being contacted independently. This is the future of space travel, beyond chemical combustion. With Rocketry, we can only get to Proxima Centauri B in 80,000 years. And you’d burn through the fuel well before that. It’s completely untenable for interstellar travel. 1. Buhler’s Skeptic Mentor Stopped Cold in 2010 The first demonstration happened in a non-vacuum lab using a laser aimed at a wall to detect small displacements. Buhler had his future brother-in-law run the test. His mentor, Dr. Sid Clements, an electrostatics expert who had dismissed the work entirely, watched the laser move and immediately abandoned what he was doing. He walked over, ran through a series of verification steps on the spot, and never questioned the reality of the effect again. That was 2010. It took two more years working with Drew before Buhler realized the force appeared even without any B field or current present. He wasn't in the field momentum regime at all. He was in pure electrostatics. 2. The Force is Not Explainable by Newton’s Laws or Ion Wind Ion wind produces thrust in the same direction the ionized air is traveling. The “Exodus force” (Buhler’s name for his new force) produces thrust perpendicular to the expected ion wind direction, reverses cleanly when the device is flipped, and remains present inside a sealed enclosure where no ionized air can escape. Buhler documented this publicly with video: a balsa lifter placed inside a sealed plastic box on a scale, powered up, lifts internally while the scale reads flat. That is conservation of momentum. That is what ion wind looks like. The Exodus force is something different, and Buhler, as the person who leads NASA's only electrostatics lab, is in an unambiguous position to make that distinction. 3. 2,000 Variations, All Producing the Same Result Since beginning collaboration with Drew, Buhler has tracked nearly 2,000 distinct test articles, each tested multiple times. Pendulums. Spinners. Rotators. Force plates. Scales. Pendulum deflections inside Faraday cages. Reversed polarity tests. Vacuum chamber runs at multiple pressure levels. DC-only configurations that eliminate magnetic field artifacts entirely. Every geometry, every material, every packaging approach. The force appears consistently. When a confounding variable is proposed, they address it, run the modified test, and the force is still there. Buhler says if an exotic explanation remains, it is not one he or any colleague has been able to name. 4. The Device Generates Thrust With the Power Off This is the finding that breaks the classical framework entirely. After charging the device and disconnecting it from the power supply, the thrust continues. The capacitor does not drain in the way a simple energy storage calculation would predict. Put on a scale, the weight reduction persists. Buhler's description: if placed in space with the power off, the device would accelerate. He cannot explain that to the scientific community and says so directly. David Chester, who has independently interacted with Drew through APEC sessions and private communications, said he cannot think of a prosaic explanation for this. The phenomenon has been reproduced enough times across enough configurations that calling it experimental error is no longer a defensible position. 5. The Implications of This for Past Antigravity Work Buhler believes his work is derivative of and related to Townsend Brown’s midcentury asymmetric capacitor experiments also showing thrust with pure electricity as the input. Chemical combustion is limited - plain and simple - we can’t get to the nearest habitable planet (Proxima Centauri B) in close the amount of time we’d need; it would take us 80,000 years and we’d burn through the fuel before we got there. It’s a checkmate in one argument against anyone claiming rockets are the frontier of efficiency. This was the dream of Thomas Townsend Brown – one that got stifled and suppressed behind the veil of secrecy and subcompartments. The common trope from experiments around the world are high electric field differentials seem to result in thrust. Buhler’s experiment exists in this lineage. 6. The Patent Office is Running the Peer Review Buhler made a deliberate choice not to pursue academic peer review as a primary path. His second patent is currently under examination, and the examiner's office has been reaching out to independent witnesses who have signed affidavits confirming they have seen and reproduced the effect. Buhler describes this as equivalent to scientific peer review, run by people with no financial interest in the outcome. His first patent may have been held under a national security review process before release. He does not confirm this, but he was aware it was a risk when he filed. 7. A QED Theorist Could Poke Holes in the Theory, But Not the Experiment We brought in UCLA PhD David Chester to evaluate Buhler’s ideas on quantum electrodynamics (which might account for the thrust being seen). David Chester's contribution was not to validate the theory Buhler proposed. He found some issues with the specific scalar virtual photon framing Buhler had developed. What Chester could not do was provide a prosaic explanation for the experimental results themselves. He said directly that, of all the anomalous phenomena he has surveyed, Buhler and Drew's work ranks in the top ten for experimental persuasiveness, specifically because of the iteration rate and the self-consistency across configurations. He noted that Drew's innovation rate alone, constantly testing new geometries and material stacks, is unlike anything he has seen from other groups making similar claims. Buhler pointed out that his theories were based on time-independent perturbation theory which Chester admits requires further examination from him. 8. NASA's UAP Investigation Had No Physicists Buhler and his wife, an engineer in NASA's Launch Services Program, were approached to assist with NASA's second UAP follow-on investigation. When Buhler asked to be placed with the physicists on the project, he was told there were none. The group was instrumentation-focused. Buhler says he was genuinely shocked. His reaction, expressed directly: if you are facing objects that defy the laws of physics, why is there not a single physicist in the room. He described the same reaction Eric Davis has expressed publicly. This is either institutional brain death or something else is happening somewhere else. 9. Six Lights Emerged from the Ocean Near Patrick Air Force Base Around 2013, Buhler and his wife were alone on the beach near Cocoa Beach, Florida, three miles south of Patrick Air Force Base. A red light appeared roughly three miles offshore, grew extremely bright, then appeared to explode, lighting the full length of beach. A helicopter launched from Patrick Air Force Base, flew to the location, hovered briefly, and returned to base without intervening. The light did not stop. It began moving toward them. At some point it split from one light into six rotating orange-pink lights that went under the water and re-emerged in a repeating cycle. The lights tracked their movement along the beach for forty minutes, closing to within roughly fifty yards before disappearing. Buhler says similar lights have been reported by others in the same area, and Stephen Greer runs group observation sessions approximately forty minutes south of the same beach. 10. The Force Crosses the Unity Threshold for Space Already The current demonstrated force is in the five to ten millinewton range. For Earth launch, that is not yet sufficient, and Buhler does not claim otherwise. For orbital station-keeping, for preventing satellite orbital decay, for repositioning between orbits in microgravity, the force exceeds what is needed. Buhler calls this hitting unity for space, moon, and Mars applications without any major development beyond what has already been demonstrated. The self-launcher, a device capable of lifting itself from Earth's surface, is the declared goal. No blueprints exist yet for the energy requirements. But the force is real, it is directional, it reverses on command, and it does not require continuous power to sustain. Why This Matters NASA's lead electrostatics scientist ran nearly 2,000 controlled experiments, eliminated every prosaic explanation the field has available, documented a thrust that persists after the power is cut, watched the fine structure constant emerge from the data repeatedly, and submitted a second patent currently under formal examination. A QED theorist with no commercial stake in the outcome reviewed the experimental claims and could not find a conventional explanation. The standard debunking line for this entire lineage of experiments has always been ion wind. That argument has been answered, documented, and filmed. What remains is a force that requires either new physics or an error that two decades of systematic testing has not been able to locate. The patent process will resolve part of this. The vacuum chamber footage will resolve more of it. Full conversation is live now. The next stage in human space travel is here.

Jesse Michels

848,205 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

My cousin, Jonathan Ord asked me to teach the Come Follow Me lesson to his mission yesterday over zoom. This is the video I did and the full text. Hi. I am Brad Smith. I have ALS, which is a really weird disease that kills the motor neurons in my body. That means that I lose the connections between my brain and my muscles. My mind is still running at the normal rate. So, I can understand everything you say to me, but I can’t respond very quickly! I am getting faster, though. Last November I was the 3rd person in the world to receive the Neuralink brain implant. So I am controlling this computer with my brain. This is my old voice, recreated by AI from just two hours of me talking to my phone. I have come to see ALS as a calling, and I am trying to magnify it. I used to talk easily, but now I have to choose my words carefully, because it is hard and slow to type what I want to say. I joke that the Lord gave me ALS to get me to shut up. Those who knew me when I could talk laugh the hardest. President Ord is my first cousin. So we share grandma and grandpa Smith. Our grandma Smith was a character. When she taught at church, she would put a sign up that read: “thus saith the lord:” so I will try to keep this within what the Lord has actually said, while trying to teach you to look at a basic principle of the gospel in a different way. Ironically, the first verse of Doctrine & Covenants 93 starts with “Verily, thus saith the Lord”. This is an amazing section of scripture, Jesus Christ telling us to step up and be better! You should study it often. I will start with a story. I asked AI to make a video to dramatically tell the story. During college, I lived in Damascus, Syria, for a semester. It was a fantastic and wonderful experience. I especially loved exploring the Old City of Damascus. The Old City is built around the huge beautiful Umayyad mosque. Within the walls of the old city is a maze of narrow, winding, confusing streets and one really long straight street, as Saul found out in Acts 9:11. One day when a group of us were trying to get through this maze from the mosque to the Christian quarter of the Old City, we asked a man for directions. He thought for a second, then pointed and said, “Go left and then right, and then left and then right, and then left and then right, and then left and right, and you’ll be there.” Aren’t those the most ridiculous directions you have ever heard? We could have ignored him. But, we thought, he did know the city better than we did. So, with some laughter, off we went. Left. Right. Left. Right. And so on until, much to our surprise, we popped out at our destination. Life is a confusing maze. We face difficult choices, unexpected events, surprises, sorrows, opportunities, roadblocks. The Lord has given directions on how to get through to where we want to go. Sometimes the Lord’s directions seem odd, and we may struggle with the decision to follow. The Lord will not force us. It is our choice whether to choose and follow him. Wasn’t that fun? AI is getting crazy! I will be much less entertaining for the rest, but hopefully the spirit will teach you something new. The phrase “keep the commandments” (or “keepeth my commandments”) appears at least 4 times in Doctrine and Covenants Section 93, in verses 1, 20, 27, and 28. There are other references, like “keep my sayings” in 52 and “obeyeth my voice” in 1. So, commandments are really important in this Revelation. I suggest that making the gospel a more central part of our lives depends largely on how we look at commandments. When you think of commandments, do you think “I can’t. I’m Mormon”? (That was a popular T-shirt slogan during my college years.) Although, with the recent guidance from President Nelson, it probably should be “I can’t, I’m a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints”. It’s a common reaction: “Thou shalt not do Cool Things.” People LOVE to focus on all the things we CAN’T do, as if we are trapped and deserve pity for our beliefs. No pity is needed. Commandments are opportunities, not constraints. Commandments are awesome! Allow me to illustrate. Imagine a spectrum between Good and Evil. Somewhere in the middle is “the Line” that divides Good from Evil. As a teenager, I wanted to know where the Line was, so I could get close to it without going over it. I wanted to be on the “Good” side but still be able to do as many “Cool Things" with my friends as possible. From my experience, I believe God gives us two types of commandments: 1) Get Back over the Line commandments and 2) Come Further into the Light commandments. Type 1, the Get Back over the Line commandments, could also be called “Misery Avoidance” commandments. They are designed to keep us out of misery or, if we’ve crossed the Line, to bring us out of misery and back into the Good side. These are generally commandments with a clear and defined point of success, such as “Thou shalt not kill.” You will know, at the end of each day, whether you have successfully followed that commandment. I think all of the Ten Commandments fall into this category. The law of Moses was very black and white. The children of Israel had been in Egypt without a prophet for a long time when Moses received the law, and they needed to work on the basics. So, if you follow the Type 1 commandments, you will refrain from doing things that make you miserable. You will know you are in the Good if you can answer the baptismal interview and temple recommend questions honestly and faithfully. If you can do that, you have taken the basic steps necessary to avoid misery and are on a solid foundation for the next type of commandment. Type 2, the “Come Further into the Light” commandments, are the really cool commandments. Once we are out of the misery category, we can really start to pursue joy. So, God commands us to do things that he knows will make us happier and more like Christ. These commandments are the principles of eternal development, such as “Love thy neighbor” (Matthew 22:39). There is no clear end to loving our neighbor—it requires positive and eternal progression. We can always love more, and we can always find another neighbor who needs our love. It is an eternal principle taught by Jesus Christ. And if we truly love our neighbor, refraining from killing him becomes pretty easy. It is through these commandments that we find joy in Jesus Christ. Elder Christofferson taught about this spectrum in the October 2018 general conference: “Most of us find ourselves at this moment on a continuum between a socially motivated participation in gospel rituals on the one hand and a fully developed, Christlike commitment to the will of God on the other. Somewhere along that continuum, the good news of the gospel of Jesus Christ enters into our heart and takes possession of our soul. It may not happen in an instant, but we should all be moving toward that blessed state.” Our goal is to go THAT WAY (toward Christ) as much as possible. So first, get back across the line and stop doing things that will make you miserable. Then make every effort to try and be like Jesus, to “love one another as Jesus loves you.” The gospel of Jesus Christ is more than just “not doing” stuff. It is about coming unto Christ, being perfected in him, and denying ourselves of all ungodliness. Discuss with your companion what commandments and mission rules are for “Misery Avoidance” and which are “Come Further into the Light”! And, remember, commandments are ALWAYS connected to huge blessings. The Lord promised, “There is a law, irrevocably decreed in heaven before the foundations of this world, upon which all blessings are predicated—and when we obtain any blessing from God, it is by obedience to that law upon which it is predicated” (Doctrine and Covenants 130:20–21). Whenever we obey any of God’s commandments, we will get the blessing associated with that commandment. Elder David A. Bednar said: “The gospel of Jesus Christ encompasses much more than avoiding, overcoming, and being cleansed from sin and the bad influences in our lives; it also essentially entails doing good, being good, and becoming better. Repenting of our sins and seeking forgiveness are spiritually necessary, and we must always do so. But remission of sin is not the only or even the ultimate purpose of the gospel. To have our hearts changed by the Holy Spirit such that “we have no more disposition to do evil, but to do good continually” (Mosiah 5:2), as did King Benjamin’s people, is the covenant responsibility we have accepted. “This mighty change is not simply the result of working harder or developing greater individual discipline. Rather, it is the consequence of a fundamental change in our desires, our motives, and our natures made possible through the Atonement of Christ the Lord. Our spiritual purpose is to overcome both sin and the desire to sin, both the taint and the tyranny of sin.” I LOVE this concept—and as I have paid attention, I feel like apostles are trying to teach us this all the time. Are we listening? Let me repeat what Elder Bednar said. He said that the commandments help us change what we WANT. Why is that important? Remember my teenage desires? I wanted to be as close to the line as possible so I could still look cool for my friends. That is a good example of the “tyranny” of sin. Even though I was not actually sinning (probably because I was afraid of my mother), I still had some small desire to sin. I said, “I can’t. I’m Mormon” with many dramatic sighs. Overcoming the tyranny of sin is getting to the point where the sin no longer looks remotely interesting or fun because we are too busy loving our neighbors and trying to be like Jesus. Elder Dallin H. Oaks said: “The Final Judgment is not just an evaluation of a sum total of good and evil acts—what we have done. It is an acknowledgment of the final effect of our acts and thoughts—what we have become. It is not enough for anyone just to go through the motions. The commandments, ordinances, and covenants of the gospel are not a list of deposits required to be made in some heavenly account. The gospel of Jesus Christ is a plan that shows us how to become what our Heavenly Father desires us to become.” This talk was given when I was on a mission, before most of you were born. It completely changed my perspective on the gospel of Jesus Christ. It is called The Challenge to Become” and I recommend that you study it. When the Lord says keep the commandments, he isn’t just telling us to stop sinning—he wants us to become like Christ and to have joy. Take a moment and think, Where am I on this continuum? Remember that none of us is perfect like the Savior, and we all need to lift one another. That is why we worship together. That is why we have priesthood quorums and the Relief Society, Primary, and youth organizations. The Lord taught us that truth when he said we all have different gifts: “To some is given one [gift], and to some is given another [gift], that all may be profited thereby. To some it is given by the Holy Ghost to know that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, and that he was crucified for the sins of the world. To others it is given to believe on their words, that they also might have eternal life if they continue faithful” (Doctrine and Covenants 46:12–14). The Savior is still WAY over there: a thousand miles away somewhere. That is why we have quorums. We all have a long way to go. Let’s link arms and run together. Let me finish by telling a story from my mission to support my testimony of Jesus. Years ago my mission president said something interesting: “Either the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is truly the kingdom of god on the earth... or it is the greatest fraud ever in history.“ It is audacious to claim to be the true Church of Jesus Christ—but let me explain exactly why I know that to be true. I always BELIEVED that I was raised in the gospel of Jesus Christ. My parents taught me well and I felt good following the commandments and studying the scriptures. That led me to serve a mission in Brazil. My turning point of testimony came when I was 20–at least 2/3rds through my mission. We were invited into a house in the “fundos” of a property—a small structure built behind a larger house. The man was polite and allowed us to share our message. As I had done hundreds of times, I shared the story of Joseph Smith, a boy who sought the truth through prayer. I recited Joseph’s own words in response to his prayer: “I saw a pillar of light exactly over my head, above the brightness of the sun, which descended gradually until it fell upon me... When the light rested upon me I saw two Personages, whose brightness and glory defy all description, standing above me in the air. One of them spake unto me, calling me by name and said, pointing to the other—This is My Beloved Son. Hear Him!" I felt the strongest feeling I had ever experienced—an undeniable confirmation that what I said was true. It hit me in a way I can never forget! I knew that Joseph Smith was truly a prophet, and therefore the Book of Mormon was the word of god. What about the man we were teaching? How had he responded to my life-affirming spiritual experience? He shrugged and politely thanked us for the message. I was stunned. I felt like the windows of heaven opened on me—and he felt nothing. I learned that receiving answers to our prayers is like tuning a radio: not everyone is on the right frequency. For some reason, the Lord decided to broadcast on my frequency that day. I received the undeniable confirmation that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is true. I have built on that foundation brick by brick since then. And every time someone has challenged me on Joseph Smith, I go back to that day in Brazil. I know that he was a prophet. My life has been blessed in ridiculously good ways since then. As I have tried to follow Jesus Christ, great things have happened to me. Even my hardest and most frustrating times have turned out to have a purpose. God has upturned my best laid plans over and over. But I look back and realize that I could never have planned any better. With the prophet Nephi I say: “I know that [God] loveth his children; nevertheless, I do not know the meaning of all things." (1 Nephi 11:17) When I say that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is true, that does not mean we have a monopoly on truth. I know Christians and Muslims who teach me to be better—and Members of the church who are far from disciples of Christ. We just have more truth: scriptures, living prophets, ordinances, personal revelation, and answers to many of life’s biggest questions! That is pretty cool. But we can’t be prideful about the truth we have. You have all probably met people to admire both inside and outside of the church. So, I am all in. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is true—not a big fraud. And we are all trying to get closer to Christ. I know that Heavenly Father has a plan for me. Life has not been what I expected, but I trust him! I know that Joseph Smith is a prophet of Jesus Christ and that the Book of Mormon is true. This is “intelligence, or, in other words, light and truth. Light and truth forsake that evil one.” With that knowledge, keep the commandments! In the name of Jesus Christ, amen .

Bradford G Smith (Brad)

20,383 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад