Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Australia does not have a problem with gun laws. It has a problem with mass immigration and in particular the failure of our intelligence agencies to detect extremists who live amongst us who do not want to integrate into our society. Australia also has a problem with our political... class who are more focused on multiculturalism than assimilation. It is an absolute abrogation of responsibility for the premiers and the prime minister to be talking about changing gun laws. (with the exception of banning non-citizens from getting a gun licence.) This is nothing more than a cover up for the failures of our intelligence agencies who did not crack down on the threat of Islamic terrorism, even when it was identified. Serious questions also need to be asked about how deep ISIS has infiltrated into Australia and what their funding sources are. Let’s not forget Western Agencies worked with Al-Qaeda in Syria. Are they also tied in with ISIS hence the reason for the soft response to their presence? People First’s immigration policy will deny entry to immigrants with radical views and deport violent criminals. You can see our policy here:show more

Gerard Rennick

106,887 subscribers

66,399 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 BREAKING: The Prime Minister of Australia is being SLAMMED for claiming the solution to Islamic terrorism is seizing more guns. "We need more gun off our streets!" THAT'S the takeaway? I've got news for Australia: it's not the guns. The guns are NOT the problem.

🚨 BREAKING: The Prime Minister of Australia is being SLAMMED for claiming the solution to Islamic terrorism is seizing more guns. "We need more gun off our streets!" THAT'S the takeaway? I've got news for Australia: it's not the guns. The guns are NOT the problem.

Eric Daugherty

256,336 views • 6 months ago

Secretary Scott Turner FIRES BACK at left-wing media pundits trying to paint the crackdown on Somali fraud in Minnesota as “racist.” Turner said this isn’t about ethnicity...it’s about enforcing the law, and some people do not want the law enforced. TURNER: “Well, Julie, it has nothing to do with it. It’s smoke and mirrors. This is all a distraction from what the real problem is here.” “This has nothing to do with race, nothing to do with ethnicity. Under President Trump’s leadership, American people...American people are first. Our country is first.” “It has nothing to do with the Somalis but it has everything to do with criminal activity.” “Our job, when we get appointed or elected, is to uphold the law, and that’s what you see going on right now.” “And there’s a lot of people in our country, some of the far-left media, far-left activists, who do not want the laws of America to be upheld.” “But this is a day, with President Trump and other leaders in our administration, where we are going to uphold the law, enforce the law, and prioritize the American people and the American people ONLY.”

Secretary Scott Turner FIRES BACK at left-wing media pundits trying to paint the crackdown on Somali fraud in Minnesota as “racist.” Turner said this isn’t about ethnicity...it’s about enforcing the law, and some people do not want the law enforced. TURNER: “Well, Julie, it has nothing to do with it. It’s smoke and mirrors. This is all a distraction from what the real problem is here.” “This has nothing to do with race, nothing to do with ethnicity. Under President Trump’s leadership, American people...American people are first. Our country is first.” “It has nothing to do with the Somalis but it has everything to do with criminal activity.” “Our job, when we get appointed or elected, is to uphold the law, and that’s what you see going on right now.” “And there’s a lot of people in our country, some of the far-left media, far-left activists, who do not want the laws of America to be upheld.” “But this is a day, with President Trump and other leaders in our administration, where we are going to uphold the law, enforce the law, and prioritize the American people and the American people ONLY.”

Overton

55,306 views • 6 months ago

The Gazalighting and projection is endless with pro-Hamas protesters. The biggest lie is that their assemblies are peaceful and lawful. Bara Abuhamed was already arrested in December 2023 for unlawful assembly and assaulting a police officer. He was also allegedly involved in a physical attack on Jews at Concordia in November 2023. He was also one of the many men who swarmed and assaulted me as I tried to leave a pro-Hamas rally on October 7th, 2024. Another lie is that anyone opposed to these fanatics is a "Racist." It is not racist to oppose being groped and assaulted by a pack of dangerous and hateful men, while I document their hate rallies for the public. It is not racist to demand the police take action against these thugs, apply our criminal code, and apply the laws of the land of this country. It is not racist to expect foreigners and Canadian Muslims to respect our customs, to exercise basic decency regarding our Cenotaph, and to abide by our laws. Canada is not merely an economic zone where the criminal underclass of failed nation states the world over can flock to, in order to advance their toxic agendas. We need an end to mass immigration. We need mass deportations. We need a moratorium on immigration and to restore our culture, our country, and our institutions before even thinking about bringing in more foreigners. Anyone who claims about the jihadis but one address the root cause-official multiculturalism and mass immigration, isn't willing to solve the problem. Nobody is coming to save you. Our politicians are cowards, traitors, and socialists. They created this problem and they want immigration to perpetuate the welfare state. Never mind that it doesn't work. They ignore the gangs of fanatics on our streets and the bad actors who have infiltrated our institutions. They pretend that the policy of multiculturalism is working and that it's laudable. They are completely petrified of being called mean words by regime "journalists," liars, and criminals. We have a very short window of opportunity to reverse this catastrophe. In fact, it may already be too late. Still, I would rather go down swinging than passively gawk as our children's inheritance is sold off to the lowest bidder. I wasn't put on this earth to be conquered by jihadis and I am doing my best to push back. Will you join me?

The Gazalighting and projection is endless with pro-Hamas protesters. The biggest lie is that their assemblies are peaceful and lawful. Bara Abuhamed was already arrested in December 2023 for unlawful assembly and assaulting a police officer. He was also allegedly involved in a physical attack on Jews at Concordia in November 2023. He was also one of the many men who swarmed and assaulted me as I tried to leave a pro-Hamas rally on October 7th, 2024. Another lie is that anyone opposed to these fanatics is a "Racist." It is not racist to oppose being groped and assaulted by a pack of dangerous and hateful men, while I document their hate rallies for the public. It is not racist to demand the police take action against these thugs, apply our criminal code, and apply the laws of the land of this country. It is not racist to expect foreigners and Canadian Muslims to respect our customs, to exercise basic decency regarding our Cenotaph, and to abide by our laws. Canada is not merely an economic zone where the criminal underclass of failed nation states the world over can flock to, in order to advance their toxic agendas. We need an end to mass immigration. We need mass deportations. We need a moratorium on immigration and to restore our culture, our country, and our institutions before even thinking about bringing in more foreigners. Anyone who claims about the jihadis but one address the root cause-official multiculturalism and mass immigration, isn't willing to solve the problem. Nobody is coming to save you. Our politicians are cowards, traitors, and socialists. They created this problem and they want immigration to perpetuate the welfare state. Never mind that it doesn't work. They ignore the gangs of fanatics on our streets and the bad actors who have infiltrated our institutions. They pretend that the policy of multiculturalism is working and that it's laudable. They are completely petrified of being called mean words by regime "journalists," liars, and criminals. We have a very short window of opportunity to reverse this catastrophe. In fact, it may already be too late. Still, I would rather go down swinging than passively gawk as our children's inheritance is sold off to the lowest bidder. I wasn't put on this earth to be conquered by jihadis and I am doing my best to push back. Will you join me?

Natasha Montreal

22,539 views • 1 year ago

Pastor Erik Reed boldly putting an end to the "both sides" arguments we've seen from many Christians over the last few weeks and calling out the Democrats for being at war with "creational reality." "We are living in a world where there are two different visions for what kind of society we want to live in. And if Christ is not in the foundations of what we're doing with our vision for the future, if the Christian foundation and worldview that made our country great to begin with is not there, and everybody's just doing what's right in their own eyes, you can guarantee chaos will ensue. We are choosing between two distinct futures. They are not the same. Our two political parties in our country are not morally equivalent to each other... I am not baptizing the Republican Party. They did not come from Mount Sinai on high from God to say 'Thus saith the Lord.' But the current state of the Democratic Party, as they are...they are a party at war with creational realities every day. Creational realities. They are at war about what it means to be a man or a woman, about marriage, about sexuality, about who has the right to live in a womb. They are at war with life and prosperity. There is one side in particular with a progressive ideology that not only tried to suppress the story of the young woman in Charlotte, but who celebrated, both in the media and with college professors and many others, the death of a man whose beliefs they did not hold... And if you're more concerned with what I've just said in the last two or three minutes, about sounding partisan, than you are concerned about the reality of what's actually happening in our society right now, you have lost the plot."

Pastor Erik Reed boldly putting an end to the "both sides" arguments we've seen from many Christians over the last few weeks and calling out the Democrats for being at war with "creational reality." "We are living in a world where there are two different visions for what kind of society we want to live in. And if Christ is not in the foundations of what we're doing with our vision for the future, if the Christian foundation and worldview that made our country great to begin with is not there, and everybody's just doing what's right in their own eyes, you can guarantee chaos will ensue. We are choosing between two distinct futures. They are not the same. Our two political parties in our country are not morally equivalent to each other... I am not baptizing the Republican Party. They did not come from Mount Sinai on high from God to say 'Thus saith the Lord.' But the current state of the Democratic Party, as they are...they are a party at war with creational realities every day. Creational realities. They are at war about what it means to be a man or a woman, about marriage, about sexuality, about who has the right to live in a womb. They are at war with life and prosperity. There is one side in particular with a progressive ideology that not only tried to suppress the story of the young woman in Charlotte, but who celebrated, both in the media and with college professors and many others, the death of a man whose beliefs they did not hold... And if you're more concerned with what I've just said in the last two or three minutes, about sounding partisan, than you are concerned about the reality of what's actually happening in our society right now, you have lost the plot."

Center for Baptist Leadership

105,515 views • 9 months ago

Senator Sean Bell: "Let's be clear, Australia already has some of the toughest gun laws in the world. We do not have a gun problem—we have a radical Islamist problem."

Senator Sean Bell: "Let's be clear, Australia already has some of the toughest gun laws in the world. We do not have a gun problem—we have a radical Islamist problem."

Kobie Thatcher

152,487 views • 6 months ago

For thirty years the people of this country have been repeatedly told that experts are the answer to any problem. Need to build more housing? Need to invest in infrastructure? Need to manage the currency? Don’t worry! An expert committee will be formed! And yet the record of governance by experts in that time is appalling. Can you think of a part of the state that functions better under these people? Perhaps the truth that our political class fails to grasp is this: running a country is not a matter for specialist expertise, it is a political exercise. Decisions must be made that balance and sometimes override competing stakeholders, not constantly embolden them. The terrifying truth about our obsession with expertise is that it has nothing to do with the experts at all. It’s about politicians who wish to shirk the responsibility of actually governing. Fine. If they don’t want to do it. We’ll find people who will. #DavidStarkey #UKPolitics #PoliticalLeadership #Governance #BritishPolitics #PoliticalAccountability #PublicPolicy

For thirty years the people of this country have been repeatedly told that experts are the answer to any problem. Need to build more housing? Need to invest in infrastructure? Need to manage the currency? Don’t worry! An expert committee will be formed! And yet the record of governance by experts in that time is appalling. Can you think of a part of the state that functions better under these people? Perhaps the truth that our political class fails to grasp is this: running a country is not a matter for specialist expertise, it is a political exercise. Decisions must be made that balance and sometimes override competing stakeholders, not constantly embolden them. The terrifying truth about our obsession with expertise is that it has nothing to do with the experts at all. It’s about politicians who wish to shirk the responsibility of actually governing. Fine. If they don’t want to do it. We’ll find people who will. #DavidStarkey #UKPolitics #PoliticalLeadership #Governance #BritishPolitics #PoliticalAccountability #PublicPolicy

David Starkey

13,958 views • 3 months ago

Australia’s immigration system is broken. It no longer works in the interests of the Australian people. Immigration policy from both parties of government – Labor and the Coalition – does not reflect the views of the Australian people. It’s driven by big business and used to prop up an economy brought low by poor government decisions. Poll after poll after poll shows most Australians think immigration is too high, or should be lowered. A staggering 1.4 million people have been brought to Australia since Labor won power in 2022. That’s more than the entire population of Adelaide, our fifth largest city. There has never been such a massive increase in our population in all our history. Last year I called for a national plebiscite on immigration to determine the views of the Australian people once and for all. Labor, the Coalition and the Greens blocked it. This showed they do not care about the Australian people’s views on immigration. It showed they do not care about the increasing numbers of Australians struggling to find secure accommodation, struggling to afford increasing rents, or trying to survive on the streets. It showed they don’t care about about the inflation caused by high immigration, or its overwhelming impact on services and infrastructure. I care, because I’m an Australian fighting for a decent standard of living for myself, my family and the Australians relying on me to fight for them. One Nation listens to the Australian people on immigration, and we develop our policies accordingly. Late last year the Department of Home Affairs revealed more than 75 thousand visa holders were in Australia illegally. Under our policy, all of them would be deported immediately. Under our policy, they would not be able to appeal their deportation to the Australian Review Tribunal. During the previous two financial years, just over 1.4 million people came to Australia courtesy of the Albanese Labor government – an average of 700 thousand per year. These numbers are obscene. One Nation will cap arrivals at 130 thousand per year – a drop of 570,000 per year from Labor’s record numbers. This will allow Australia to catch its breath, catch up with housing, and catch up with services and infrastructure. One Nation’s policy introduces a minimum eight-year waiting period for immigrants before they can apply for Australian citizenship and the privileges that come with it. Over this eight-year period, immigrants will be required to consistently demonstrate they are fit to become Australians. We want to reinforce the principle that Australian citizenship is a privilege to be earned, not an entitlement to be given away. Foreign students will be included in our 130 thousand per year cap. Australian universities must be broken of their addiction to foreign students, and forced to prioritise the tertiary education of Australian students. With modern communications technology, there is no compelling reason why most of these students can’t do Australian courses at home unless, of course, you factor in the amount of money they send back home from Australia. In 2023 this figure was 10 billion dollars. It’s a scam to take jobs and wealth from Australians, and we’re going to put a stop to it. One Nation’s policy will also stop those on student visas from using the system as a backdoor to permanent residency, and we’ll prevent students from bringing family members here. Our policy also demands the reinstatement of temporary protection visas and Australia’s withdrawal from the UN Refugee Convention. TPVs are a proven means of deterring people smuggling, stopping the boats and those arriving by plane. Labor is keeping things quiet, but it’s well known the people smugglers are constantly testing our borders and more boats have made it to the mainland in recent months. Under our policy, immigration from nations known to foster extremism will be prohibited. The major parties failure to screen out extremists at the border is directly responsible for the unrest and violence we’ve seen on our streets and in our suburbs. One Nation is the only party with a strong immigration policy that reflects the will of the Australian people. That’s because we’re the only party that puts Australia and Australians first.

Australia’s immigration system is broken. It no longer works in the interests of the Australian people. Immigration policy from both parties of government – Labor and the Coalition – does not reflect the views of the Australian people. It’s driven by big business and used to prop up an economy brought low by poor government decisions. Poll after poll after poll shows most Australians think immigration is too high, or should be lowered. A staggering 1.4 million people have been brought to Australia since Labor won power in 2022. That’s more than the entire population of Adelaide, our fifth largest city. There has never been such a massive increase in our population in all our history. Last year I called for a national plebiscite on immigration to determine the views of the Australian people once and for all. Labor, the Coalition and the Greens blocked it. This showed they do not care about the Australian people’s views on immigration. It showed they do not care about the increasing numbers of Australians struggling to find secure accommodation, struggling to afford increasing rents, or trying to survive on the streets. It showed they don’t care about about the inflation caused by high immigration, or its overwhelming impact on services and infrastructure. I care, because I’m an Australian fighting for a decent standard of living for myself, my family and the Australians relying on me to fight for them. One Nation listens to the Australian people on immigration, and we develop our policies accordingly. Late last year the Department of Home Affairs revealed more than 75 thousand visa holders were in Australia illegally. Under our policy, all of them would be deported immediately. Under our policy, they would not be able to appeal their deportation to the Australian Review Tribunal. During the previous two financial years, just over 1.4 million people came to Australia courtesy of the Albanese Labor government – an average of 700 thousand per year. These numbers are obscene. One Nation will cap arrivals at 130 thousand per year – a drop of 570,000 per year from Labor’s record numbers. This will allow Australia to catch its breath, catch up with housing, and catch up with services and infrastructure. One Nation’s policy introduces a minimum eight-year waiting period for immigrants before they can apply for Australian citizenship and the privileges that come with it. Over this eight-year period, immigrants will be required to consistently demonstrate they are fit to become Australians. We want to reinforce the principle that Australian citizenship is a privilege to be earned, not an entitlement to be given away. Foreign students will be included in our 130 thousand per year cap. Australian universities must be broken of their addiction to foreign students, and forced to prioritise the tertiary education of Australian students. With modern communications technology, there is no compelling reason why most of these students can’t do Australian courses at home unless, of course, you factor in the amount of money they send back home from Australia. In 2023 this figure was 10 billion dollars. It’s a scam to take jobs and wealth from Australians, and we’re going to put a stop to it. One Nation’s policy will also stop those on student visas from using the system as a backdoor to permanent residency, and we’ll prevent students from bringing family members here. Our policy also demands the reinstatement of temporary protection visas and Australia’s withdrawal from the UN Refugee Convention. TPVs are a proven means of deterring people smuggling, stopping the boats and those arriving by plane. Labor is keeping things quiet, but it’s well known the people smugglers are constantly testing our borders and more boats have made it to the mainland in recent months. Under our policy, immigration from nations known to foster extremism will be prohibited. The major parties failure to screen out extremists at the border is directly responsible for the unrest and violence we’ve seen on our streets and in our suburbs. One Nation is the only party with a strong immigration policy that reflects the will of the Australian people. That’s because we’re the only party that puts Australia and Australians first.

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

32,433 views • 1 year ago

There is nothing more disgusting than a government using a parent's grief as cover to ram through bad law. Emma Mason is being used. You can see just how cruel the government is, on this interview with Deb Knight on A Current Affair last night. Her grief is being abused by governments and the media in Australia to justify removing access to social media from all children under the age of 16. Worse than that, they are using her to justify the most draconian internet access rules in the world, and it’s not just for kids. Every adult in Australia will have to age verify to get online to use sites like YouTube, facebook, Instagram, TikTok and X. Emma’s story, and that of her daughter is tragic, but the truth is: banning selective social media access will not stop bullying. It will not save the lives of children, and it does not absolve parental responsibility. Outsourcing parenting to government is both cowardly and foolish. Anyone who caught the ABC Lateline piece from 1975 released on this platform by John Adams earlier this week, would know, the Australian Government does not care about our children. We’ve seen real harm perpetrated on kids at government and government regulated childcare facilities. We see a rise in juvenile crime and weak bail laws, encouraging kids to perpetrate more and more extreme crime, and we know there still exists a culture of coverup when it comes to child harm among the establishment elite. The people who have drafted and passed the social media age ban laws are either not au fait with technology, or worse, they are authoritarian bullies who do not want any criticism from the only outlet available to the public – social media. Most disturbing to me though, is this misconceived belief that parents need the government to ban social media so they can parent their children. That is most certainly not the case. Mason further calls on even more government to provide the resources to help parents copilot the law. Because even she can see that it is an absolute mess that will cause harm. The government is an uncaring and incompetent machine, and most Australians seem completely unaware of those facts. The law only impacts the law abiding, and silly laws make for more lawlessness. The social media age ban and the subsequent requirement for adult identification is a silly law. It is possible to circumvent, and it will be circumvented. It will also breed a culture of lawlessness among our youth, and when they start to get away with these smaller ‘crimes’, they will indeed feel emboldened to test other laws. I am tired of Australian governments using tragedy to take more of our rights and freedoms away. We don’t need the government’s help to parent our children or lull us into the false sense of security that they keep us and our children safe. Go shopping in Melbourne and see how safe you feel. Watching the heartless machine use a mother’s grief is painful. It is disgusting. Albanese, Ley and the rest of the Australian political establishment should be ashamed of themselves, because they know exactly what they are doing. We must not stand for this. We must resist, push back and not comply. It is nothing more than a government sponsored attack on our privacy and free speech. It has nothing to do with child safety. We must parent our own children and educate them on how much we have already lost in the name of security and safety. We must show them that we don’t support the government, and maybe by the time they have grown up and are voting, we can start to elect people who deserve to be in leadership positions. Because the people we have right now are a danger to our future prosperity. This is not Australia. I just want Australia back.

There is nothing more disgusting than a government using a parent's grief as cover to ram through bad law. Emma Mason is being used. You can see just how cruel the government is, on this interview with Deb Knight on A Current Affair last night. Her grief is being abused by governments and the media in Australia to justify removing access to social media from all children under the age of 16. Worse than that, they are using her to justify the most draconian internet access rules in the world, and it’s not just for kids. Every adult in Australia will have to age verify to get online to use sites like YouTube, facebook, Instagram, TikTok and X. Emma’s story, and that of her daughter is tragic, but the truth is: banning selective social media access will not stop bullying. It will not save the lives of children, and it does not absolve parental responsibility. Outsourcing parenting to government is both cowardly and foolish. Anyone who caught the ABC Lateline piece from 1975 released on this platform by John Adams earlier this week, would know, the Australian Government does not care about our children. We’ve seen real harm perpetrated on kids at government and government regulated childcare facilities. We see a rise in juvenile crime and weak bail laws, encouraging kids to perpetrate more and more extreme crime, and we know there still exists a culture of coverup when it comes to child harm among the establishment elite. The people who have drafted and passed the social media age ban laws are either not au fait with technology, or worse, they are authoritarian bullies who do not want any criticism from the only outlet available to the public – social media. Most disturbing to me though, is this misconceived belief that parents need the government to ban social media so they can parent their children. That is most certainly not the case. Mason further calls on even more government to provide the resources to help parents copilot the law. Because even she can see that it is an absolute mess that will cause harm. The government is an uncaring and incompetent machine, and most Australians seem completely unaware of those facts. The law only impacts the law abiding, and silly laws make for more lawlessness. The social media age ban and the subsequent requirement for adult identification is a silly law. It is possible to circumvent, and it will be circumvented. It will also breed a culture of lawlessness among our youth, and when they start to get away with these smaller ‘crimes’, they will indeed feel emboldened to test other laws. I am tired of Australian governments using tragedy to take more of our rights and freedoms away. We don’t need the government’s help to parent our children or lull us into the false sense of security that they keep us and our children safe. Go shopping in Melbourne and see how safe you feel. Watching the heartless machine use a mother’s grief is painful. It is disgusting. Albanese, Ley and the rest of the Australian political establishment should be ashamed of themselves, because they know exactly what they are doing. We must not stand for this. We must resist, push back and not comply. It is nothing more than a government sponsored attack on our privacy and free speech. It has nothing to do with child safety. We must parent our own children and educate them on how much we have already lost in the name of security and safety. We must show them that we don’t support the government, and maybe by the time they have grown up and are voting, we can start to elect people who deserve to be in leadership positions. Because the people we have right now are a danger to our future prosperity. This is not Australia. I just want Australia back.

Matthew Camenzuli

29,745 views • 9 months ago

Congressman Brandon Gill called today for an outright ban on Islamic Immigration He has consistently said importing Muslims into America “is idiotic and suicidal” They will never assimilate, they attack us, they will continue to run for office and it only ends with living under Sharia Law “Bringing in lots of people from cultures that are unassimilable and incompatible with our own, whether it's from Somalia or from other parts of the Islamic world, for instance, as, as you alluded to, I think is idiotic and suicidal. The reality is that, that not all cultures are equal, and not all cultures are equally compatible with, with our governing framework. And I think our, our immigration policy ought to recognize that and ought to recognize those, those basic truths that, that it should be in our power to determine who comes into our society. That is a core part of, of American sovereignty.”

Congressman Brandon Gill called today for an outright ban on Islamic Immigration He has consistently said importing Muslims into America “is idiotic and suicidal” They will never assimilate, they attack us, they will continue to run for office and it only ends with living under Sharia Law “Bringing in lots of people from cultures that are unassimilable and incompatible with our own, whether it's from Somalia or from other parts of the Islamic world, for instance, as, as you alluded to, I think is idiotic and suicidal. The reality is that, that not all cultures are equal, and not all cultures are equally compatible with, with our governing framework. And I think our, our immigration policy ought to recognize that and ought to recognize those, those basic truths that, that it should be in our power to determine who comes into our society. That is a core part of, of American sovereignty.”

Wall Street Apes

146,523 views • 4 months ago

'Terrorism has no religion. Those who are not educated can be easily radicalized and hence become terrorists.' Yet whenever we come across any news of someone joining ISIS, the prefix and suffix of their name are often the same. Why? Terrorism has no religion, right? Tausif Ali, from one of the best institutes in our country is writing letters to join ISIS. Why? They are getting radicalized only because of lack of education, right? All of this has nothing to do with the 'BOOK,' right? And guess what has taken the headlines today? A few men playing Holi. Of course, that's more serious than a terrorist among students. 🤡

'Terrorism has no religion. Those who are not educated can be easily radicalized and hence become terrorists.' Yet whenever we come across any news of someone joining ISIS, the prefix and suffix of their name are often the same. Why? Terrorism has no religion, right? Tausif Ali, from one of the best institutes in our country is writing letters to join ISIS. Why? They are getting radicalized only because of lack of education, right? All of this has nothing to do with the 'BOOK,' right? And guess what has taken the headlines today? A few men playing Holi. Of course, that's more serious than a terrorist among students. 🤡

BALA

552,794 views • 2 years ago

This video is spreading on X showing a FerroMex train in Zacatecas, Mexico with immigrants allegedly “heading to our southern border”. This kind of thing has been happening for the last 60+ years. It happened under Trump, it happened under Bush and Obama and now Biden. Biden’s immigration policy is not much different than Trump’s was. The border is no more “open” than it was 3 years ago. Remember the “caravans” under Trump? Instead of posting videos of people who want to come here for a better life and pretending as if they are mostly bad people, how about we figure out a way to work together to come up with an actual solution. The recent surge has more to do with chaos and the economies in South America and Central America than any US policy. Those complaining the loudest usually aren’t offering solutions so let’s hear your solutions.

This video is spreading on X showing a FerroMex train in Zacatecas, Mexico with immigrants allegedly “heading to our southern border”. This kind of thing has been happening for the last 60+ years. It happened under Trump, it happened under Bush and Obama and now Biden. Biden’s immigration policy is not much different than Trump’s was. The border is no more “open” than it was 3 years ago. Remember the “caravans” under Trump? Instead of posting videos of people who want to come here for a better life and pretending as if they are mostly bad people, how about we figure out a way to work together to come up with an actual solution. The recent surge has more to do with chaos and the economies in South America and Central America than any US policy. Those complaining the loudest usually aren’t offering solutions so let’s hear your solutions.

Brian Krassenstein

2,960,177 views • 2 years ago

🚨 I have moved a bill to abolish the Department of Multiculturalism NSW. I HATE the policy of multiculturalism and support assimilation - here's why. Most of the immigration debate in recent years has been about total numbers. The government has let in too many migrants too quickly and we’re suffering overpriced housing, overcrowded cities, overburdened infrastructure etc. This is why I advocate for a five-year immigration pause ... but it's only half the story. We also need to have a serious rethink about how we encourage migrants to assimilate into Australian culture. The woke left claim Australia doesn’t have any unique culture. They claim that our culture is “multi-culture” ... but that is logically incoherent and just plain wrong. It’s true Australians have come from many countries, but over the centuries we have developed an Australian identity that is more than the sum of its parts. Contrary to our political and cultural elites, most Australians still like Australia. We like our people, our history, our traditions and our way of life. We do not want our culture to be replaced by a sudden influx of millions of foreigners. Most of these foreigners might be wonderful people, they might bring skills, have fun festivals and spicy foods, and they might be able to tick the “not a terrorist” box on the arrival form … but even if all of that is true, people who like the existing Australian culture (i.e. most of us) do not want to see our culture so casually replaced by a hodgepodge of foreign cultures. That is why the migrants that have arrived should be expected to integrate into our way of life and assimilate into our culture. This is not a radical position. It has worked well with earlier waves of Australian immigration, and the same would be expected from you if you migrated to Japan or Brazil. We don’t need to be pricks about it … the process can take time, and obviously people will remember where they came from … but assimilation is preferable to division and Balkanisation. And yet the government promotes the exact opposite. Rather than encouraging integration, or just leaving people alone to gradually assimilate, the NSW government has an agency dedicated subsidising our differences. Multicultural NSW employs 140 bureaucrats and spends roughly $70 million of taxpayers’ money to encourage new migrants to stick with their old culture. They are literally using our money to ensure that immigration causes more division and sectarianism than it would do otherwise. The agency needs to be scrapped. Afuera! Abolishing Multicultural NSW would not ban people from eating Mexican food or celebrating Chinese New Year or speaking Polish. To each their own. But there’s no reason for the rest of the population to pay for these choices. To rub salt into the wound, NSW Premier Ho Chi Minns then uses the existence of multiculturalism to justify censorship. He has claimed several times over the last year that multiculturalism is not compatible with vibrant free speech. A reasonable person would see this as an argument against multiculturalism, but amazingly Minns uses this as an argument against free speech! The people of NSW and Australia were never asked about this trade off. Instead, the political class has taken our money to subsidise cultural division, and then used that division to justify cracking down on our free speech. This is Orwellian. That is why the Libertarian Party has introduced a bill into NSW parliament to abolish Multicultural NSW and replace it with nothing. I encourage other MPs in other state parliaments to move a similar bill. This bill will come on for debate in coming months. Labor will obviously oppose but will be interesting to see how the Libs and Nats vote. If this repeal bill fails (for now) and taxpayers continue to be forced to fund various ethnic groups etc I encourage the British Australian Community (BAC) to apply for funding. As a general rule, the larger the ethnic group, the more the funding ... so BAC should easily get more funding than all the other groups combined. Libertarian Party NSW (Liberal Democrats) British Australian Community

🚨 I have moved a bill to abolish the Department of Multiculturalism NSW. I HATE the policy of multiculturalism and support assimilation - here's why. Most of the immigration debate in recent years has been about total numbers. The government has let in too many migrants too quickly and we’re suffering overpriced housing, overcrowded cities, overburdened infrastructure etc. This is why I advocate for a five-year immigration pause ... but it's only half the story. We also need to have a serious rethink about how we encourage migrants to assimilate into Australian culture. The woke left claim Australia doesn’t have any unique culture. They claim that our culture is “multi-culture” ... but that is logically incoherent and just plain wrong. It’s true Australians have come from many countries, but over the centuries we have developed an Australian identity that is more than the sum of its parts. Contrary to our political and cultural elites, most Australians still like Australia. We like our people, our history, our traditions and our way of life. We do not want our culture to be replaced by a sudden influx of millions of foreigners. Most of these foreigners might be wonderful people, they might bring skills, have fun festivals and spicy foods, and they might be able to tick the “not a terrorist” box on the arrival form … but even if all of that is true, people who like the existing Australian culture (i.e. most of us) do not want to see our culture so casually replaced by a hodgepodge of foreign cultures. That is why the migrants that have arrived should be expected to integrate into our way of life and assimilate into our culture. This is not a radical position. It has worked well with earlier waves of Australian immigration, and the same would be expected from you if you migrated to Japan or Brazil. We don’t need to be pricks about it … the process can take time, and obviously people will remember where they came from … but assimilation is preferable to division and Balkanisation. And yet the government promotes the exact opposite. Rather than encouraging integration, or just leaving people alone to gradually assimilate, the NSW government has an agency dedicated subsidising our differences. Multicultural NSW employs 140 bureaucrats and spends roughly $70 million of taxpayers’ money to encourage new migrants to stick with their old culture. They are literally using our money to ensure that immigration causes more division and sectarianism than it would do otherwise. The agency needs to be scrapped. Afuera! Abolishing Multicultural NSW would not ban people from eating Mexican food or celebrating Chinese New Year or speaking Polish. To each their own. But there’s no reason for the rest of the population to pay for these choices. To rub salt into the wound, NSW Premier Ho Chi Minns then uses the existence of multiculturalism to justify censorship. He has claimed several times over the last year that multiculturalism is not compatible with vibrant free speech. A reasonable person would see this as an argument against multiculturalism, but amazingly Minns uses this as an argument against free speech! The people of NSW and Australia were never asked about this trade off. Instead, the political class has taken our money to subsidise cultural division, and then used that division to justify cracking down on our free speech. This is Orwellian. That is why the Libertarian Party has introduced a bill into NSW parliament to abolish Multicultural NSW and replace it with nothing. I encourage other MPs in other state parliaments to move a similar bill. This bill will come on for debate in coming months. Labor will obviously oppose but will be interesting to see how the Libs and Nats vote. If this repeal bill fails (for now) and taxpayers continue to be forced to fund various ethnic groups etc I encourage the British Australian Community (BAC) to apply for funding. As a general rule, the larger the ethnic group, the more the funding ... so BAC should easily get more funding than all the other groups combined. Libertarian Party NSW (Liberal Democrats) British Australian Community

John Ruddick MLC - Libertarian

18,587 views • 3 months ago

Reposting because the AEC requires authorisation. •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• The Intelligence agencies need to be held accountable for the Covid lab leak. So it turns out that Intelligence agencies knew all along that Covid was a lab leak. I’ve been the only politician in Canberra saying this and the only politician who has called for the role of Edward Holmes, a professor from the University of Sydney to be explained. People First will continue to pursue the Intelligence Agencies for their deceit. He was the one who wrote and co-authored the Lancet paper that ridiculed the idea that the virus was a lab leak. It is was my view he is an intelligence asset and an enemy of the state for covering up the role of the intelligence agencies in funding and creating the Covid virus and the government induced pandemic. And I quote from the link below: “Within hours, Vallance spoke with intelligence officials in the United Kingdom and Holmes spoke with intelligence officials in Australia.” Why would Australian intelligence officials speak with Holmes? Why was he so special? Is it because he was the deputy director of the Chinese CDC. An odd role for an Australian to have. It is incumbent upon the ASIO to ask why he lied about the origins of Covid. I have actually asked ASIO why they aren’t pursuing Holmes, and they claim it’s not their responsibility. This proves that ASIO and ASIS are in on the cover up and are now in fact accessories to the deaths of thousands of Australians. The involvement of intelligence officials regarding Covid should be bigger news than the assassination of JFK or September 11, given the number of deaths. Quote from:

Reposting because the AEC requires authorisation. •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• The Intelligence agencies need to be held accountable for the Covid lab leak. So it turns out that Intelligence agencies knew all along that Covid was a lab leak. I’ve been the only politician in Canberra saying this and the only politician who has called for the role of Edward Holmes, a professor from the University of Sydney to be explained. People First will continue to pursue the Intelligence Agencies for their deceit. He was the one who wrote and co-authored the Lancet paper that ridiculed the idea that the virus was a lab leak. It is was my view he is an intelligence asset and an enemy of the state for covering up the role of the intelligence agencies in funding and creating the Covid virus and the government induced pandemic. And I quote from the link below: “Within hours, Vallance spoke with intelligence officials in the United Kingdom and Holmes spoke with intelligence officials in Australia.” Why would Australian intelligence officials speak with Holmes? Why was he so special? Is it because he was the deputy director of the Chinese CDC. An odd role for an Australian to have. It is incumbent upon the ASIO to ask why he lied about the origins of Covid. I have actually asked ASIO why they aren’t pursuing Holmes, and they claim it’s not their responsibility. This proves that ASIO and ASIS are in on the cover up and are now in fact accessories to the deaths of thousands of Australians. The involvement of intelligence officials regarding Covid should be bigger news than the assassination of JFK or September 11, given the number of deaths. Quote from:

Gerard Rennick

29,339 views • 1 year ago

Residents are NOT happy with Chicago's plan to move illegals out of downtown ahead of the DNC: "Not our problem." "We do NOT need this." "All we want to do is house our veterans — and they're getting kicked to the side for the people who didn't do anything for this country."

Residents are NOT happy with Chicago's plan to move illegals out of downtown ahead of the DNC: "Not our problem." "We do NOT need this." "All we want to do is house our veterans — and they're getting kicked to the side for the people who didn't do anything for this country."

RNC Research

53,023 views • 2 years ago

Winston Peters responds to Brian Tamaki’s March and Mark Mitchell’s response : “This country has a Judeo Christian background, whether you go to church or not. I have always said we want people who we need, not need us. Our democracy is based on Christianity I understand that.. when they come here they salute our flag and obey our rules. I cannot understand some people’s (Mark Mitchell - Seymour) response to this” Both big parties who have the most power have both indulged in the immigration ponzy scam which irrefutably leads to a breakdown in societal cohesion. Ask yourself why is it that Victoria Australia is busy changing suburbs names to Indian ones? Why is it that some boroughs in Australia have sharia law as does Britain? In the past decades changing the country’s demography through mass immigration is a recipe for a disaster and will destroy the nation. Look around the world for the evidence you need of this. Will immigration be a major voting issue for YOU next year? Because we need it to be and vote in numbers for a party who will big enough to make real changes to the immigration insanity.

Winston Peters responds to Brian Tamaki’s March and Mark Mitchell’s response : “This country has a Judeo Christian background, whether you go to church or not. I have always said we want people who we need, not need us. Our democracy is based on Christianity I understand that.. when they come here they salute our flag and obey our rules. I cannot understand some people’s (Mark Mitchell - Seymour) response to this” Both big parties who have the most power have both indulged in the immigration ponzy scam which irrefutably leads to a breakdown in societal cohesion. Ask yourself why is it that Victoria Australia is busy changing suburbs names to Indian ones? Why is it that some boroughs in Australia have sharia law as does Britain? In the past decades changing the country’s demography through mass immigration is a recipe for a disaster and will destroy the nation. Look around the world for the evidence you need of this. Will immigration be a major voting issue for YOU next year? Because we need it to be and vote in numbers for a party who will big enough to make real changes to the immigration insanity.

Holyhekatuiteka

14,273 views • 1 year ago

I thank each of our combat brigades, all soldiers, and commanders who are using all their strength to destroy the enemy, especially by effectively deploying our drone capabilities. Our Ukrainian Defense and Security Forces are already gaining an advantage in this area – in July, our soldiers deployed more drones than the occupiers. This needs to be a steady trend on the front – across all types of drones available to our units: from FPV to all others, including our long-range drones – which are already having a strategic impact on the war. Impacting – in the interests of Ukraine. And our Ukrainian leadership in drones can not only be a factor that brings a just end to the war closer but also makes Ukraine a supplier of security for other states. Today, Mykhailo Fedorov, Vice Prime Minister for Innovations, Development of Education, Science and Technologies, and Oleksandr Kamyshin, Minister of Strategic Industries of Ukraine, also reported at the Staff meeting on drone production and financing. For this year, a million drones have already been contracted with our manufacturers, and by the end of the year, there will be more. Our drone production capabilities are consistently expanding. We're working not only with state funding but also with partners who are investing in our drone manufacturing. These drones are crucial for our defense now and will later enhance security for everyone who values life and stands with us in solidarity.

I thank each of our combat brigades, all soldiers, and commanders who are using all their strength to destroy the enemy, especially by effectively deploying our drone capabilities. Our Ukrainian Defense and Security Forces are already gaining an advantage in this area – in July, our soldiers deployed more drones than the occupiers. This needs to be a steady trend on the front – across all types of drones available to our units: from FPV to all others, including our long-range drones – which are already having a strategic impact on the war. Impacting – in the interests of Ukraine. And our Ukrainian leadership in drones can not only be a factor that brings a just end to the war closer but also makes Ukraine a supplier of security for other states. Today, Mykhailo Fedorov, Vice Prime Minister for Innovations, Development of Education, Science and Technologies, and Oleksandr Kamyshin, Minister of Strategic Industries of Ukraine, also reported at the Staff meeting on drone production and financing. For this year, a million drones have already been contracted with our manufacturers, and by the end of the year, there will be more. Our drone production capabilities are consistently expanding. We're working not only with state funding but also with partners who are investing in our drone manufacturing. These drones are crucial for our defense now and will later enhance security for everyone who values life and stands with us in solidarity.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

317,136 views • 1 year ago

I have consistently maintained this view regarding illegal immigration from our southern border, and I extend the same principle to those seeking to enter from elsewhere: immigration is not a global entitlement. Entry into the United States is not a moral guarantee—it is a policy decision that must be made based on our national interests. Period. The United States has always been a nation of immigrants, yes—but only when immigration was tied to a clear contribution to the country’s development. We cannot continue to frame immigration as an emotional issue. It is a matter of economic limits, social cohesion, and political responsibility. Assimilation is necessary, but it is not sufficient. Even the most well-meaning immigrant draws from the same finite pool of housing, education, healthcare, and job opportunities as native-born citizens. That is not an ideological opinion—it is a reality of scarcity. Resources are not elastic. We have overcrowded schools, strained hospitals, and a housing crisis that is pricing out working-class Americans. Only a fool would advocate adding more people to a stressed system, regardless of their character or intentions, worsens these challenges. This is not about demonizing anyone. It is about prioritizing Americans—particularly the working-class, who are often the first to feel the pressure of unchecked immigration. Low-skilled workers are often the ones who are asked to absorb the costs of policies designed by elites who remain immune to their disastrous consequences. I think we need a temporary immigration moratorium, it’s not isolationist; it is pragmatic. It is not a wall against the world—it is a pause to rebuild our foundation. Before we open the door any wider, we must ensure the house is in order. We must fix our schools, address our housing shortage, restore the integrity of our immigration laws, and rebalance a labor market that is growing increasingly hostile to the working people of this country. Immigration must serve the national interest—not sentimentalism, not globalism, and certainly not guilt. Until we can guarantee that our immigration system works for the American people, we have no obligation—moral or legal—to accept others simply because they ask or because some people feel bad. This is not a rejection of compassion. It is a reaffirmation of responsibility.

I have consistently maintained this view regarding illegal immigration from our southern border, and I extend the same principle to those seeking to enter from elsewhere: immigration is not a global entitlement. Entry into the United States is not a moral guarantee—it is a policy decision that must be made based on our national interests. Period. The United States has always been a nation of immigrants, yes—but only when immigration was tied to a clear contribution to the country’s development. We cannot continue to frame immigration as an emotional issue. It is a matter of economic limits, social cohesion, and political responsibility. Assimilation is necessary, but it is not sufficient. Even the most well-meaning immigrant draws from the same finite pool of housing, education, healthcare, and job opportunities as native-born citizens. That is not an ideological opinion—it is a reality of scarcity. Resources are not elastic. We have overcrowded schools, strained hospitals, and a housing crisis that is pricing out working-class Americans. Only a fool would advocate adding more people to a stressed system, regardless of their character or intentions, worsens these challenges. This is not about demonizing anyone. It is about prioritizing Americans—particularly the working-class, who are often the first to feel the pressure of unchecked immigration. Low-skilled workers are often the ones who are asked to absorb the costs of policies designed by elites who remain immune to their disastrous consequences. I think we need a temporary immigration moratorium, it’s not isolationist; it is pragmatic. It is not a wall against the world—it is a pause to rebuild our foundation. Before we open the door any wider, we must ensure the house is in order. We must fix our schools, address our housing shortage, restore the integrity of our immigration laws, and rebalance a labor market that is growing increasingly hostile to the working people of this country. Immigration must serve the national interest—not sentimentalism, not globalism, and certainly not guilt. Until we can guarantee that our immigration system works for the American people, we have no obligation—moral or legal—to accept others simply because they ask or because some people feel bad. This is not a rejection of compassion. It is a reaffirmation of responsibility.

Shermichael Singleton

11,440 views • 1 year ago

Mamdani responds to Mullin: Our laws and our values are not bargaining chips. We are proud of the more than 3 million New Yorkers who are immigrants. I'm one of them. It is incumbent upon us to live up to the ideals of the statue of liberty, not just tell people to come and look at it when they visit from across the world.

Mamdani responds to Mullin: Our laws and our values are not bargaining chips. We are proud of the more than 3 million New Yorkers who are immigrants. I'm one of them. It is incumbent upon us to live up to the ideals of the statue of liberty, not just tell people to come and look at it when they visit from across the world.

Acyn

88,717 views • 1 month ago