Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

AUSTRALIA: “GLOBALIZE THE INTIFADA” DECLARED HATE SPEECH Chris Minns Chris Minns, Premier of New South Wales, has defended his government’s crackdown on protests, including formally designating the chant “globalise the intifada” as hate speech. Minns recalled parliament to fast-track changes to protest laws following the terror attack at a...

MOSSADil's profile picture

Mossad Commentary

1,048,050 subscribers

14,975 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

NEW: Chris Minns, the Premier of New South Wales, is calling for stronger gun-control measures in the wake of the deadly attack at Bondi Beach in Sydney, Australia, which left 15 victims dead. “It means introducing a bill to parliament to — I mean, to be really blunt — make it more difficult to get these horrifying weapons that have no practical use in our community.”
1:02

NEW: Chris Minns, the Premier of New South Wales, is calling for stronger gun-control measures in the wake of the deadly attack at Bondi Beach in Sydney, Australia, which left 15 victims dead. “It means introducing a bill to parliament to — I mean, to be really blunt — make it more difficult to get these horrifying weapons that have no practical use in our community.”

Fox News

813,234 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

NSW Premier Chris Minns says he makes "no apologies" for having stricter hate speech laws than in the US, with plans to further strengthen these laws in February. He also emphasises that there is “no room for debate” on the matter of multiculturalism in Australia.
0:25

NSW Premier Chris Minns says he makes "no apologies" for having stricter hate speech laws than in the US, with plans to further strengthen these laws in February. He also emphasises that there is “no room for debate” on the matter of multiculturalism in Australia.

Anthony Khallouf

181,464 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

NSW Premier Chris Minns says there is no statute of limitations for his hate speech laws, warning that anyone who breaches them should expect to be confronted by police. He makes no apology, saying Australia does not have the same free speech laws as the United States.
0:44

NSW Premier Chris Minns says there is no statute of limitations for his hate speech laws, warning that anyone who breaches them should expect to be confronted by police. He makes no apology, saying Australia does not have the same free speech laws as the United States.

Anthony Khallouf

114,337 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

NSW Premier Chris Minns has vowed to do everything in his power to stop the NSN from registering ‘White Australia’ as a political party before the state election, adding that the Govt. will move to strengthen hate speech laws to explicitly prevent them from protesting at all.
2:16

NSW Premier Chris Minns has vowed to do everything in his power to stop the NSN from registering ‘White Australia’ as a political party before the state election, adding that the Govt. will move to strengthen hate speech laws to explicitly prevent them from protesting at all.

Anthony Khallouf

149,619 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

The attack in Sydney is exactly what it means to “globalize the Intifada.” What we witnessed in Australia was the real-world application of that call to violence. Some of my remarks today in the aftermath of a horrific antisemitic terror attack in Australia, carried out as Jews were celebrating Hanukkah:
1:36

The attack in Sydney is exactly what it means to “globalize the Intifada.” What we witnessed in Australia was the real-world application of that call to violence. Some of my remarks today in the aftermath of a horrific antisemitic terror attack in Australia, carried out as Jews were celebrating Hanukkah:

Eric Adams

98,297 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

An order for the production of documents for a parliamentary inquiry into the establishment of NSW ‘Hate Speech’ laws has passed without resistance from the government. This will enable the inquiry to request documents, including but not limited to: - Draft briefing notes, diary entries, emails, electronic messages, and other relevant records in the possession of police and Members of Parliament, including Premier Chris Minns.
1:14

An order for the production of documents for a parliamentary inquiry into the establishment of NSW ‘Hate Speech’ laws has passed without resistance from the government. This will enable the inquiry to request documents, including but not limited to: - Draft briefing notes, diary entries, emails, electronic messages, and other relevant records in the possession of police and Members of Parliament, including Premier Chris Minns.

Australians vs. The Agenda

10,452 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Here's a compilation of Premier Minns' claiming, 'Australia doesn't have free speech because we are a multicultural society.' In February he denied ever saying it, attempted to mock me and then his Labor goons tried to back him up ... but the videos do not lie (unlike Minns). This week I came with the receipts and Pinocchio hated it. Why can't Minns just make an intellectual case to support his position? Because it is so absurd. In the March 2027 NSW election free speech is on the ballot.
5:16

Here's a compilation of Premier Minns' claiming, 'Australia doesn't have free speech because we are a multicultural society.' In February he denied ever saying it, attempted to mock me and then his Labor goons tried to back him up ... but the videos do not lie (unlike Minns). This week I came with the receipts and Pinocchio hated it. Why can't Minns just make an intellectual case to support his position? Because it is so absurd. In the March 2027 NSW election free speech is on the ballot.

John Ruddick MLC - Libertarian

35,348 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

🔴🚩For two years, people at pro-Hamas protests have chanted “globalize the intifada.” Now the world is seeing what that violent slogan truly means. After 15 Jews were murdered in Bondi Beach, PM Netanyahu sent a clear message to PM Albanese: your government did nothing to stop the spread of antisemitism in Australia.
0:52

🔴🚩For two years, people at pro-Hamas protests have chanted “globalize the intifada.” Now the world is seeing what that violent slogan truly means. After 15 Jews were murdered in Bondi Beach, PM Netanyahu sent a clear message to PM Albanese: your government did nothing to stop the spread of antisemitism in Australia.

Shosh Bedrosian

30,241 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

NBC’s Kristen Welker pressed NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani three times today to condemn the slogan “Globalize the Intifada.” He declined. Welker: ➤ “Do you condemn that phrase, Globalize the Intifada?” ➤ “But do you actually condemn it… which a lot of people hear as a call to violence against Jews?” ➤ “For the people who feel really concerned by that phrase, why not just condemn it?” Mamdani did not condemn the phrase—and he has explicitly rejected any incitement to violence. As he told The Bulwark: “I’ve been clear that any incitement to violence is something that I’m in opposition to.” Intifada—Arabic for “uprising” or “shaking off”—has historically referred to a wide spectrum of resistance. The First Intifada (1987–1993) was driven by mass boycotts, general strikes, student protests, and civil disobedience. It was largely nonviolent in its early stages. Many supporters of the slogan say “Globalize the Intifada” draws from that legacy: a call for international solidarity through protest, divestment, and organized resistance to apartheid, occupation, and genocide—not violence. Below are some common claims made against using the phrase, and the context they ignore: ❌ Claim 1: “Intifada” refers to violent Palestinian uprisings, so invoking it globally implies promoting violence against Jews. Supporters argue this reduces the term to its most militant associations and erases its broader meaning. The First Intifada began as a largely nonviolent, community-led uprising—characterized by strikes, protests, and boycotts. To “globalize” that tradition is to extend a call for collective resistance to injustice, not armed struggle. ❌ Claim 2: The phrase glorifies past violence. Liberation movements are often framed this way. The same was said of anti-apartheid slogans in South Africa—and of “By Any Means Necessary” during the U.S. Black liberation struggle, a phrase made famous by Malcolm X and later embraced by radical groups like the Black Panthers. Critics called it militant, but supporters saw it as a refusal to accept injustice on anyone else’s terms. Likewise, supporters of “Globalize the Intifada” say the slogan is not about glorifying violence—it’s about rejecting silence in the face of ongoing atrocity. ❌ Claim 3: It’s provocative—and therefore threatening. It is provocative—because it challenges power. So did “Black Power,” “No Justice, No Peace,” and “Land Back.” Political slogans are meant to confront injustice, not make it comfortable. Arabic political speech is often racialized in the West, seen as inherently violent or threatening—regardless of content. That helps explain the reaction to “intifada.” But even if the phrase were “Globalize Resistance,” it likely wouldn’t be accepted either. Supporters argue the real discomfort isn’t with the wording—it’s with the demand itself, and who’s making it. ❌ Claim 4: Even if not intended as such, it may incite violence. This is guilt by association. Every protest movement risks being misrepresented. But “Globalize the Intifada” has been overwhelmingly used in nonviolent student protests, cultural actions, and anti-genocide campaigns. Its targets are systems—occupation, apartheid, blockade—not civilians. A misreading by individuals doesn’t make the slogan itself violent. ❌ Claim 5: The phrase is dangerous because it could be co-opted by extremists. If that standard were applied universally, many mainstream political slogans would be disqualified. “Israel has a right to defend itself” has been repeatedly used to justify the genocide of the Palestinian people, including mass killing and forced displacement. “Am Yisrael Chai” (“The Nation of Israel Lives”) is chanted in settler marches that have ended in pogroms against Palestinian villages. Yet these slogans are judged by their context and usage—not banned outright. Supporters argue “Globalize the Intifada” should be held to the same standard.
2:40

NBC’s Kristen Welker pressed NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani three times today to condemn the slogan “Globalize the Intifada.” He declined. Welker: ➤ “Do you condemn that phrase, Globalize the Intifada?” ➤ “But do you actually condemn it… which a lot of people hear as a call to violence against Jews?” ➤ “For the people who feel really concerned by that phrase, why not just condemn it?” Mamdani did not condemn the phrase—and he has explicitly rejected any incitement to violence. As he told The Bulwark: “I’ve been clear that any incitement to violence is something that I’m in opposition to.” Intifada—Arabic for “uprising” or “shaking off”—has historically referred to a wide spectrum of resistance. The First Intifada (1987–1993) was driven by mass boycotts, general strikes, student protests, and civil disobedience. It was largely nonviolent in its early stages. Many supporters of the slogan say “Globalize the Intifada” draws from that legacy: a call for international solidarity through protest, divestment, and organized resistance to apartheid, occupation, and genocide—not violence. Below are some common claims made against using the phrase, and the context they ignore: ❌ Claim 1: “Intifada” refers to violent Palestinian uprisings, so invoking it globally implies promoting violence against Jews. Supporters argue this reduces the term to its most militant associations and erases its broader meaning. The First Intifada began as a largely nonviolent, community-led uprising—characterized by strikes, protests, and boycotts. To “globalize” that tradition is to extend a call for collective resistance to injustice, not armed struggle. ❌ Claim 2: The phrase glorifies past violence. Liberation movements are often framed this way. The same was said of anti-apartheid slogans in South Africa—and of “By Any Means Necessary” during the U.S. Black liberation struggle, a phrase made famous by Malcolm X and later embraced by radical groups like the Black Panthers. Critics called it militant, but supporters saw it as a refusal to accept injustice on anyone else’s terms. Likewise, supporters of “Globalize the Intifada” say the slogan is not about glorifying violence—it’s about rejecting silence in the face of ongoing atrocity. ❌ Claim 3: It’s provocative—and therefore threatening. It is provocative—because it challenges power. So did “Black Power,” “No Justice, No Peace,” and “Land Back.” Political slogans are meant to confront injustice, not make it comfortable. Arabic political speech is often racialized in the West, seen as inherently violent or threatening—regardless of content. That helps explain the reaction to “intifada.” But even if the phrase were “Globalize Resistance,” it likely wouldn’t be accepted either. Supporters argue the real discomfort isn’t with the wording—it’s with the demand itself, and who’s making it. ❌ Claim 4: Even if not intended as such, it may incite violence. This is guilt by association. Every protest movement risks being misrepresented. But “Globalize the Intifada” has been overwhelmingly used in nonviolent student protests, cultural actions, and anti-genocide campaigns. Its targets are systems—occupation, apartheid, blockade—not civilians. A misreading by individuals doesn’t make the slogan itself violent. ❌ Claim 5: The phrase is dangerous because it could be co-opted by extremists. If that standard were applied universally, many mainstream political slogans would be disqualified. “Israel has a right to defend itself” has been repeatedly used to justify the genocide of the Palestinian people, including mass killing and forced displacement. “Am Yisrael Chai” (“The Nation of Israel Lives”) is chanted in settler marches that have ended in pogroms against Palestinian villages. Yet these slogans are judged by their context and usage—not banned outright. Supporters argue “Globalize the Intifada” should be held to the same standard.

Drop Site

70,852 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

in the new Time Magazine interview Zohran Mamdani says he told CEOs he will now "discourage the use of intifada" because he "listened to New Yorkers, including Jewish leaders and a Rabbi who said it evokes memories of bus bombings". Why is he listening to deranged genocidal Zionist freaks over the countless Palestinian and anti-genocide New Yorkers, including many Jews? He himself defended the use of the term by accurately describing what it actually means, calling out the Islamophobic racism that lies behind the contrived Zionist hysteria about it, and noting that even the Holocaust Museum used it. But instead of standing by the truth of what not just the phrase "Globalize the Intifada", but the term "intifada" itself actually means, he has bowed to the most insane deranged genocidal Zionist freaks alive, hidden behind the phrase "listening to Jewish leaders and a Rabbi". This does not portend well for how he will act when he becomes mayor, as he has already established the standard that he will bow to deranged Zionist hysterical screeching as long as it continues enough, and he'll happily throw aside his own principles and commitment to the truth and exposing Islamophobic and anti-Palestinian racism to do it.
2:18

in the new Time Magazine interview Zohran Mamdani says he told CEOs he will now "discourage the use of intifada" because he "listened to New Yorkers, including Jewish leaders and a Rabbi who said it evokes memories of bus bombings". Why is he listening to deranged genocidal Zionist freaks over the countless Palestinian and anti-genocide New Yorkers, including many Jews? He himself defended the use of the term by accurately describing what it actually means, calling out the Islamophobic racism that lies behind the contrived Zionist hysteria about it, and noting that even the Holocaust Museum used it. But instead of standing by the truth of what not just the phrase "Globalize the Intifada", but the term "intifada" itself actually means, he has bowed to the most insane deranged genocidal Zionist freaks alive, hidden behind the phrase "listening to Jewish leaders and a Rabbi". This does not portend well for how he will act when he becomes mayor, as he has already established the standard that he will bow to deranged Zionist hysterical screeching as long as it continues enough, and he'll happily throw aside his own principles and commitment to the truth and exposing Islamophobic and anti-Palestinian racism to do it.

☀️👀

325,722 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

[Excerpt from Premier Minns speech at the Evening of Light and Solidarity with Herzog] Premier Minns should reflect on his words when he points the finger at all Australians for failing “the test of human decency” when the country his guest presides over shows not a shred of human decency in its treatment of Palestinians. Hopefully it will occur to Minns that the Sydney demonstrators were rallying because their humanity forces them to rail against a genocide. The protesters have not failed any test of human decency: to the contrary they reflect its epitome. The most glaring failure of morality this century is the actions of the state of Israel in Gaza and the inaction of Western countries that support those actions contrary to the wishes of the majority of their population. Sheeting blame or responsibility for the Bondi shootings home to ordinary Australians is an intolerable insult. The Bondi murders were committed by very much atypical Australians motivated by an apparent extreme ideology. #nswpol
2:14

[Excerpt from Premier Minns speech at the Evening of Light and Solidarity with Herzog] Premier Minns should reflect on his words when he points the finger at all Australians for failing “the test of human decency” when the country his guest presides over shows not a shred of human decency in its treatment of Palestinians. Hopefully it will occur to Minns that the Sydney demonstrators were rallying because their humanity forces them to rail against a genocide. The protesters have not failed any test of human decency: to the contrary they reflect its epitome. The most glaring failure of morality this century is the actions of the state of Israel in Gaza and the inaction of Western countries that support those actions contrary to the wishes of the majority of their population. Sheeting blame or responsibility for the Bondi shootings home to ordinary Australians is an intolerable insult. The Bondi murders were committed by very much atypical Australians motivated by an apparent extreme ideology. #nswpol

KellieTranter

23,838 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Sen. Cruz warns that the Bondi Beach attack reflects a rising wave of antisemitism and radical Islamic terrorism, arguing that chants to “globalize the intifada” have real-world consequences: "What we are seeing, what we saw on Bondi Beach, was the latest manifestation of this evil — and this evil is spreading. This hatred of Israel, this hatred of Jews. Radical Islamic terrorism — they are at war with us; this is their objective. There’s evidence that this father–son duo of murderers were affiliated with ISIS, were doing so waging jihad, and I will tell you, as we watch the horrors of 15 people murdered in Australia in that mass shooting and over 40 people injured, we saw some radicals on the left basically sending out thoughts and prayers. And my response to the radical leftists in America is: what exactly do you think ‘globalize the intifada’ means? What you have been chanting in the streets, what you have been chanting on college campuses — this is exactly the result of ‘globalize the intifada.’"
1:22

Sen. Cruz warns that the Bondi Beach attack reflects a rising wave of antisemitism and radical Islamic terrorism, arguing that chants to “globalize the intifada” have real-world consequences: "What we are seeing, what we saw on Bondi Beach, was the latest manifestation of this evil — and this evil is spreading. This hatred of Israel, this hatred of Jews. Radical Islamic terrorism — they are at war with us; this is their objective. There’s evidence that this father–son duo of murderers were affiliated with ISIS, were doing so waging jihad, and I will tell you, as we watch the horrors of 15 people murdered in Australia in that mass shooting and over 40 people injured, we saw some radicals on the left basically sending out thoughts and prayers. And my response to the radical leftists in America is: what exactly do you think ‘globalize the intifada’ means? What you have been chanting in the streets, what you have been chanting on college campuses — this is exactly the result of ‘globalize the intifada.’"

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

75,310 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Our voices will not be silenced, even as calls for justice — including “from the river to the sea” — are censored. This intifada is a demand for freedom and dignity, and the genocide against Palestinians must end, regardless of government inaction. 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸 Intifada (انتفاضة) is an Arabic word that literally means “shaking off” or “uprising.” In context, it refers to a popular uprising or mass resistance against oppression or occupation—especially used to describe Palestinian uprisings against Israeli military rule. Importantly: •The root meaning is to shake off injustice or control •It does not inherently mean violence •It includes civil resistance, protests, strikes, boycotts, and community organising, alongside confrontations At its core, intifada means people rising up to reclaim dignity, rights, and freedom.
0:45

Our voices will not be silenced, even as calls for justice — including “from the river to the sea” — are censored. This intifada is a demand for freedom and dignity, and the genocide against Palestinians must end, regardless of government inaction. 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸 Intifada (انتفاضة) is an Arabic word that literally means “shaking off” or “uprising.” In context, it refers to a popular uprising or mass resistance against oppression or occupation—especially used to describe Palestinian uprisings against Israeli military rule. Importantly: •The root meaning is to shake off injustice or control •It does not inherently mean violence •It includes civil resistance, protests, strikes, boycotts, and community organising, alongside confrontations At its core, intifada means people rising up to reclaim dignity, rights, and freedom.

Robert Martin 🇵🇸

62,730 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 HERZOG IN AUSTRALIA AFTER HANUKKAH TERROR ATTACK President Isaac Herzog visited the site of the Bondi Beach Hanukkah massacre, where 15 people were murdered, delivering a message of solidarity to Australia’s Jewish community. His message was clear: “Hatred that starts with the Jews never ends with the Jews.” Herzog called antisemitism a global emergency, warning that terrorism targets not only Jews but the values of democratic societies everywhere. He also emphasized that Israel and Australia stand together against terror, while protests are being planned in Sydney during his visit. When terror strikes Jews anywhere in the world, the message from Israel is simple: You are not alone. Stay connected, follow Mossad Commentary.
5:34

🚨 HERZOG IN AUSTRALIA AFTER HANUKKAH TERROR ATTACK President Isaac Herzog visited the site of the Bondi Beach Hanukkah massacre, where 15 people were murdered, delivering a message of solidarity to Australia’s Jewish community. His message was clear: “Hatred that starts with the Jews never ends with the Jews.” Herzog called antisemitism a global emergency, warning that terrorism targets not only Jews but the values of democratic societies everywhere. He also emphasized that Israel and Australia stand together against terror, while protests are being planned in Sydney during his visit. When terror strikes Jews anywhere in the world, the message from Israel is simple: You are not alone. Stay connected, follow Mossad Commentary.

Mossad Commentary

20,359 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Joel Davis leaves court charged with speech crimes for his 'Abolish The Jewish Lobby' protest. Outside, white leftists pause rallying for free 'globalise the intifada' speech to heckle Davis for his anti-Semitism. Meanwhile 'new nationalists' reposition and rebrand to fill a political vacuum left by the federal ban of the White Australia Party as a 'hate group', and right wing establishments purge extremists suspected of supporting Davis. Australians continue to be pressured their allegiance on ‘anti semitism’ as the most important issue in their lives.
2:19

Joel Davis leaves court charged with speech crimes for his 'Abolish The Jewish Lobby' protest. Outside, white leftists pause rallying for free 'globalise the intifada' speech to heckle Davis for his anti-Semitism. Meanwhile 'new nationalists' reposition and rebrand to fill a political vacuum left by the federal ban of the White Australia Party as a 'hate group', and right wing establishments purge extremists suspected of supporting Davis. Australians continue to be pressured their allegiance on ‘anti semitism’ as the most important issue in their lives.

Chriscoveries

40,010 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Karnatka's Hate Speech Bill: Congress government in Karnataka has tabled a bill that claims to curb hate speech, but it attempts to risk free speech! The wording of the bill is vague and open to interpretation, which means even ordinary statements could be judged as ill will and lead to serious criminal action. India already has laws to deal with hate speech, and even the Supreme Court has said that the real problem is weak enforcement, not the absence of law. When the line between free speech and crime becomes unclear, people begin to self censor out of fear rather than responsibility!
2:16

Karnatka's Hate Speech Bill: Congress government in Karnataka has tabled a bill that claims to curb hate speech, but it attempts to risk free speech! The wording of the bill is vague and open to interpretation, which means even ordinary statements could be judged as ill will and lead to serious criminal action. India already has laws to deal with hate speech, and even the Supreme Court has said that the real problem is weak enforcement, not the absence of law. When the line between free speech and crime becomes unclear, people begin to self censor out of fear rather than responsibility!

Praffulgarg

11,269 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten