Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Australia should exercise its own decisions regarding healthcare issues and emergencies, not walk in lockstep with the dictates of the World Health Organisation. Yet, the government is set to sign us up to a WHO “pandemic treaty” which would make the WHO’s policies international law. This is a power-grab... show more

Senator Alex Antic

68,496 subscribers

143,782 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The WHO’s new “pandemic treaty” represents the gradual ceding of sovereignty to unelected UN bureaucrats. The treaty gives the WHO greater control over responses to international health crises and allows for even speedier development of “pandemic related products.” Watch as I discuss the pandemic treaty.

The WHO’s new “pandemic treaty” represents the gradual ceding of sovereignty to unelected UN bureaucrats. The treaty gives the WHO greater control over responses to international health crises and allows for even speedier development of “pandemic related products.” Watch as I discuss the pandemic treaty.

Senator Alex Antic

36,605 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Pandemic Treaty Reemerges With a Vengeance as WHO Seeks to Become the Global Health Police If rammed through, the WHO would have the power to both define and declare a pandemic — as well as undermine the sovereignty of nation-states to make their own health policies. @NaomiRWolf

Pandemic Treaty Reemerges With a Vengeance as WHO Seeks to Become the Global Health Police If rammed through, the WHO would have the power to both define and declare a pandemic — as well as undermine the sovereignty of nation-states to make their own health policies. @NaomiRWolf

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

141,348 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

We cannot sign a Treaty with the World Health Organization (WHO) World Health Organisation that forces us into Lockdown, or compels us into action that may not be in Britain’s interests. No Pandemic Treaty is better than a bad Pandemic Treaty

We cannot sign a Treaty with the World Health Organization (WHO) World Health Organisation that forces us into Lockdown, or compels us into action that may not be in Britain’s interests. No Pandemic Treaty is better than a bad Pandemic Treaty

Suella Braverman

325,459 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The government is jacking up CEO salaries, by €100,000, they say, because of international recruitment competition. Yet the same rule does not apply for the 7000 Irish health care professionals who are currently working in Australia.

The government is jacking up CEO salaries, by €100,000, they say, because of international recruitment competition. Yet the same rule does not apply for the 7000 Irish health care professionals who are currently working in Australia.

Peadar Tóibín TD

18,493 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I understand that many Australians are deeply concerned about protecting our country’s sovereignty, especially when it comes to public health decisions. One Nation firmly opposes surrendering Australia's sovereignty to unelected global bodies like the United Nation and WHO. No international organisation should have the power to impose lockdowns or medical procedures on Australians. The WHO has proven it cannot be trusted with our national interests and Australia must exit and protect its sovereignty. To clarify where things currently stand, the WHO Pandemic Agreement was adopted by the World Health Assembly in May 2025 and signed by Australia’s Health Minister Mark Butler. However, it’s important to note that this agreement hasn’t been ratified yet. For it to take effect, both houses of Parliament must assent to it. Any international treaty, including this one, must go through Australia’s formal treaty-making process. That includes review by the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties. This committee will resume when Parliament returns later in July. Even once ratified, formal legislation must still be passed by Parliament to give effect to any elements of the agreement. I encourage you not to worry about any dates being circulated right now. No legislation has been passed, and we’re keeping a close eye on any developments. If anything changes, I'll be sure to keep you updated. One Nation supports full parliamentary debate and formal votes on any treaty, and will work to ensure this occurs in this case as well. This is my latest video on the WHO Treaty, which was prepared for an international summit.

I understand that many Australians are deeply concerned about protecting our country’s sovereignty, especially when it comes to public health decisions. One Nation firmly opposes surrendering Australia's sovereignty to unelected global bodies like the United Nation and WHO. No international organisation should have the power to impose lockdowns or medical procedures on Australians. The WHO has proven it cannot be trusted with our national interests and Australia must exit and protect its sovereignty. To clarify where things currently stand, the WHO Pandemic Agreement was adopted by the World Health Assembly in May 2025 and signed by Australia’s Health Minister Mark Butler. However, it’s important to note that this agreement hasn’t been ratified yet. For it to take effect, both houses of Parliament must assent to it. Any international treaty, including this one, must go through Australia’s formal treaty-making process. That includes review by the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties. This committee will resume when Parliament returns later in July. Even once ratified, formal legislation must still be passed by Parliament to give effect to any elements of the agreement. I encourage you not to worry about any dates being circulated right now. No legislation has been passed, and we’re keeping a close eye on any developments. If anything changes, I'll be sure to keep you updated. One Nation supports full parliamentary debate and formal votes on any treaty, and will work to ensure this occurs in this case as well. This is my latest video on the WHO Treaty, which was prepared for an international summit.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

31,930 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I am in Rome, Italy, to speak about the #WHO Pandemic Treaty and the amendments to the International Health Regulation. Both pose an imminent danger to national sovereignty and democracy. We have to stop the vote that is scheduled in May. Stay tuned for my speech!

I am in Rome, Italy, to speak about the #WHO Pandemic Treaty and the amendments to the International Health Regulation. Both pose an imminent danger to national sovereignty and democracy. We have to stop the vote that is scheduled in May. Stay tuned for my speech!

Rob Roos 🇳🇱

24,307 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 At the end of May, the WHO wants to vote on the Pandemic Treaty and the amendments to the International Health Regulation. They are breaking their own rules by doing so. The Pandemic Treaty has received more attention and its content is worse. But it is unlikely to pass. The amendments to the IHR are the real imminent threat to democracy and fundamental rights worldwide. Last week, I spoke about this in Rome. Wherever in the world you may live: get in contact your elected representatives. Ask them to STOP this WHO vote from happening. Share this message!

🚨 At the end of May, the WHO wants to vote on the Pandemic Treaty and the amendments to the International Health Regulation. They are breaking their own rules by doing so. The Pandemic Treaty has received more attention and its content is worse. But it is unlikely to pass. The amendments to the IHR are the real imminent threat to democracy and fundamental rights worldwide. Last week, I spoke about this in Rome. Wherever in the world you may live: get in contact your elected representatives. Ask them to STOP this WHO vote from happening. Share this message!

Rob Roos 🇳🇱

21,311 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 The #WHO already has the exclusive power to declare a pandemic. It also has the exclusive power to declare its end. Now, it wants the worldwide power to impose restrictions & bypass democracy during a pandemic. We have 3 months to stop this. Watch my speech in the US Senate:

🚨 The #WHO already has the exclusive power to declare a pandemic. It also has the exclusive power to declare its end. Now, it wants the worldwide power to impose restrictions & bypass democracy during a pandemic. We have 3 months to stop this. Watch my speech in the US Senate:

Rob Roos 🇳🇱

94,082 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Worldwide awareness is building re the dangers of the WHO Pandemic Treaty. Members of US Congress just held a press conference slamming the WHO and calling for the US to defund and withdraw from this corrupt Globalist/China affiliated organisation which seeks to control every aspect of peoples’ lives particularly through the notion of ‘one health’. Allowing this Treaty to stand will be the death knell of democracy.

Worldwide awareness is building re the dangers of the WHO Pandemic Treaty. Members of US Congress just held a press conference slamming the WHO and calling for the US to defund and withdraw from this corrupt Globalist/China affiliated organisation which seeks to control every aspect of peoples’ lives particularly through the notion of ‘one health’. Allowing this Treaty to stand will be the death knell of democracy.

Kat A 🌸

373,732 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

🚨 JUST IN: Iran is being eviscerated nationwide for trying to form HUMAN SHIELDS of CHILDREN around power plant and bridge targets set to be struck by the US tonight For all the countries who care about international law, this is a VIOLATION of that Iran is run by vile animals.

🚨 JUST IN: Iran is being eviscerated nationwide for trying to form HUMAN SHIELDS of CHILDREN around power plant and bridge targets set to be struck by the US tonight For all the countries who care about international law, this is a VIOLATION of that Iran is run by vile animals.

Eric Daugherty

284,981 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

just now on ABC News - UN Special Rapporteur Prof Ben Saul - UN SR Human Rights & Counterterror "It's crystal clear that these are illegal attacks on Iran by the US and Israel. They amount to the international crime of aggression ... This is one of the clearest violations of the most fundamental rule of the post-World War order since 1945, which is not to aggressively attack other countries" "All countries who genuinely care for a rules-based international order, which Australia says it supports, really need to stand up and protest this kind of lawlessness. It's not just about breaking international law, this also makes the whole world less safe"

just now on ABC News - UN Special Rapporteur Prof Ben Saul - UN SR Human Rights & Counterterror "It's crystal clear that these are illegal attacks on Iran by the US and Israel. They amount to the international crime of aggression ... This is one of the clearest violations of the most fundamental rule of the post-World War order since 1945, which is not to aggressively attack other countries" "All countries who genuinely care for a rules-based international order, which Australia says it supports, really need to stand up and protest this kind of lawlessness. It's not just about breaking international law, this also makes the whole world less safe"

Susan Metcalfe

97,006 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Angus: This is a president who says the only constraint on his actions is not Congress, not the courts, not international law, but, quote, “my own morality, my own mind.” There is no morality in a man accused of being a rapist, and no morality in a political system that would give such unprecedented power to this criminal.

Angus: This is a president who says the only constraint on his actions is not Congress, not the courts, not international law, but, quote, “my own morality, my own mind.” There is no morality in a man accused of being a rapist, and no morality in a political system that would give such unprecedented power to this criminal.

Acyn

152,990 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

WARNING : Tedros and the corrupt World Health Organisation are plotting to bring back "Vaccine Passports". And they want to bring them back as "International Digitised Vaccine Certificates" Their plan is that you won‘t be able to cross international borders unless you have submitted to inject into your body whatever the corrupt WHO demands. While Labor & Liberal continue to suck up to the WHO - The United Australia Party says Tedros can shove his International Digitised Vaccine Certificates were the sun don’t shine. By threatening the movement of people across international borders - the WHO should be declared a terrorist organisation. It’s time to exit the WHO. Do you agree ? #ExitTheWHO

WARNING : Tedros and the corrupt World Health Organisation are plotting to bring back "Vaccine Passports". And they want to bring them back as "International Digitised Vaccine Certificates" Their plan is that you won‘t be able to cross international borders unless you have submitted to inject into your body whatever the corrupt WHO demands. While Labor & Liberal continue to suck up to the WHO - The United Australia Party says Tedros can shove his International Digitised Vaccine Certificates were the sun don’t shine. By threatening the movement of people across international borders - the WHO should be declared a terrorist organisation. It’s time to exit the WHO. Do you agree ? #ExitTheWHO

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

507,226 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

We do not need ever more centralised control Yesterday, a UK parliamentary committee held a debate on the proposed WHO pandemic treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005). Please listen to this perfectly on point speech by the honourable MP Danny Kruger. Please share it far and wide. Excerpts of the speech: "It's these amendments that are of the greater concern. These proposed new regulations will hardwire into international law and into our own domestic policy a top-down approach to pandemics and to global public health. So yes, we need cooperation, yes, we need strategic vision, but no, we do not need ever more centralised solutions. And in fact, in this country, it wasn't the top-down approach that worked in COVID-19. ... What worked best was people taking responsibility for themselves and their neighbours, local government working with civil society, medical leaders exercising their judgement ... What worked was not central control but subsidiarity, decisions taken as close as possible to the people that they affected. ... So what we are seeing now, is the World Health Organisation not just setting itself up as responsible for identifying pandemics but also for the responses worldwide to those pandemics. ... And of course, we know about the WHO. We know its unaccountable nature. The Director-General appointed through an opague undemocratic process, too much power for international pharmaceutical companies. ... And crucially, [the amendments] propose that the existing powers for the WHO to make recommendations about what countries should do should be upgraded from non-binding to binding recommendations. So, it amounts to a vast transfer of power to the WHO." If you want to learn more about the subject, please read this in-depth document that contains all relevant original references and was prepared by political/legal experts:

We do not need ever more centralised control Yesterday, a UK parliamentary committee held a debate on the proposed WHO pandemic treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005). Please listen to this perfectly on point speech by the honourable MP Danny Kruger. Please share it far and wide. Excerpts of the speech: "It's these amendments that are of the greater concern. These proposed new regulations will hardwire into international law and into our own domestic policy a top-down approach to pandemics and to global public health. So yes, we need cooperation, yes, we need strategic vision, but no, we do not need ever more centralised solutions. And in fact, in this country, it wasn't the top-down approach that worked in COVID-19. ... What worked best was people taking responsibility for themselves and their neighbours, local government working with civil society, medical leaders exercising their judgement ... What worked was not central control but subsidiarity, decisions taken as close as possible to the people that they affected. ... So what we are seeing now, is the World Health Organisation not just setting itself up as responsible for identifying pandemics but also for the responses worldwide to those pandemics. ... And of course, we know about the WHO. We know its unaccountable nature. The Director-General appointed through an opague undemocratic process, too much power for international pharmaceutical companies. ... And crucially, [the amendments] propose that the existing powers for the WHO to make recommendations about what countries should do should be upgraded from non-binding to binding recommendations. So, it amounts to a vast transfer of power to the WHO." If you want to learn more about the subject, please read this in-depth document that contains all relevant original references and was prepared by political/legal experts:

Dr Tess Lawrie

48,054 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

The Harris-Biden Admin is attempting to sell out our sovereignty to unelected globalists. The IHR Treaty would essentially allow the UN and WHO to take control wherever they want to. The House and Senate must reject, push back, and fully halt this unconstitutional power grab.

The Harris-Biden Admin is attempting to sell out our sovereignty to unelected globalists. The IHR Treaty would essentially allow the UN and WHO to take control wherever they want to. The House and Senate must reject, push back, and fully halt this unconstitutional power grab.

Rep. Eli Crane

174,217 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is terrifying. The World Health Organization just signed a legally binding pandemic treaty—handing itself sweeping powers over how countries respond to future health emergencies. The BBC says it’s to prevent “disorganization” next time. But what it really means is this: the WHO now claims authority over global supply chains, vaccine rollouts, and disease surveillance—run by an unelected body with zero accountability. Even though Trump started the withdrawal process, the U.S. is still locked in until 2026, thanks to Biden’s push for International Health Regulation (IHR) amendments. So for now, America is still under their control. The treaty ties directly into those IHR rules, which define “health products” as practically everything—vaccines, diagnostics, gene-based therapies, antidotes, PPE, and more. The WHO wants power over it all. Worse, the treaty demands 24/7 surveillance, censorship of so-called “misinformation,” and mandatory funding—forcing nations to bankroll their own medical prison. And just before this treaty is finalized, Fauci reappears, warning of another deadly respiratory virus. At the same time, the FDA quietly approves new H5N1 vaccines. Coincidence? Hear Fauci’s words for yourself. Then ask: why do they always show up right before the next “emergency”? The U.S. needs to EXIT the WHO. Not later. Now. Watch break all this down.

This is terrifying. The World Health Organization just signed a legally binding pandemic treaty—handing itself sweeping powers over how countries respond to future health emergencies. The BBC says it’s to prevent “disorganization” next time. But what it really means is this: the WHO now claims authority over global supply chains, vaccine rollouts, and disease surveillance—run by an unelected body with zero accountability. Even though Trump started the withdrawal process, the U.S. is still locked in until 2026, thanks to Biden’s push for International Health Regulation (IHR) amendments. So for now, America is still under their control. The treaty ties directly into those IHR rules, which define “health products” as practically everything—vaccines, diagnostics, gene-based therapies, antidotes, PPE, and more. The WHO wants power over it all. Worse, the treaty demands 24/7 surveillance, censorship of so-called “misinformation,” and mandatory funding—forcing nations to bankroll their own medical prison. And just before this treaty is finalized, Fauci reappears, warning of another deadly respiratory virus. At the same time, the FDA quietly approves new H5N1 vaccines. Coincidence? Hear Fauci’s words for yourself. Then ask: why do they always show up right before the next “emergency”? The U.S. needs to EXIT the WHO. Not later. Now. Watch break all this down.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

732,310 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr