Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Australia’s public broadcaster ABC is running an anti-British show called “STUFF THE BRITISH STOLE.” As part of the show they interview a group of predominantly Asian Australian school students who want to change the Australian flag to erase the British Union Jack. These students say that the flag doesn’t...

126,863 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

An Indian born Labor member of the Western Australian parliament asserted this week that Indian people are Indigenous to Australia due to ancient migration flows 4000 years ago. She asserted that many Aboriginal Australians have Indian DNA. I am extremely worried about how inflammatory this discourse is for communal harmony in Australia. Considering the fact that she made these claims in the context of a discussion of who really is Australian, her implicit argument appears to be that Indian Australians have a stronger tie to Australia than white Australians - a truly explosive and divisive claim. I personally come from a Greek migrant family with four generations in Australia. I try to be respectful towards Australians with generational heritage stretching back to the First Fleet because I know my personal family history does not include that. I know that those Australians were instrumental in the building of modern Australia so I don’t want to disrespect their contributions. I don’t go around saying that Australia is really a Greek country or that Greeks have an Indigenous claim to Australia that supplants the claims of Anglo-Celtic Australians. That would be wrong, and it would also be massively damaging and explosive for race relations and inter communal relations in this country. My strong advice to friends in the Indian Australian community would be to not engage in this kind of discourse which implicitly devalues or downgrades the British heritage of modern Australia. I understand that when people are hurt by racism they often feel defensive and want to hit back by asserting their right to live in Australia. Of course I understand that human impulse. But you can’t go about this by trying to implicitly devalue the contributions of European Australians and devalue their ties to the country. Australia was set up with British institutions and these institutions built this country up and guaranteed our shared prosperity. It’s morally wrong to try tear that down. It will damage the future success of our country and I believe it can only lead to more division and racism.

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼

37,936 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

There was some controversy in the Senate yesterday that resulted in my right to speak in the chamber being temporarily revoked by the Labor Government, with the support of the Greens. This happened due to comments I made during a debate where I criticised the Greens for their apologist stance toward Islamic extremist terrorism. As a consequence, I was unable to deliver a speech I had prepared, which called for an end to the excessive use of acknowledgments and welcomes to country. Fortunately, I have strong backup in the form of One Nation Senator Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺 who was able to deliver the speech and instigate this debate on my behalf. Even when they attempt to silence one voice, they cannot silence all of us. The will of the people will always find a way to be heard. Here are the prepared remarks I had intended to deliver: I would like to congratulate the Australian people for their overwhelming rejection of the divisive voice to Parliament at the October referendum. However, it was more than a rejection of the voice. It was a rejection of the entire Uluru Statement – all 26 pages of it. It was a rejection of a treaty and truth-telling – or more accurately, a re-write of history with an eye on financial settlements funded by non-indigenous taxpayers. It was a rejection of identity politics, grievance politics and the activist cult of victimhood. And primarily, it was a rejection of racial division. And one of the most racially divisive features of modern discourse in Australia is welcome to country ceremonies, along with acknowledgements of country. Australians – including many indigenous people – are sick and tired of them. They are sick of being told Australia is not their country, which is what these things effectively do. Welcomes and acknowledgements deny the citizenship and sovereignty held equally by all Australians. They perpetuate the falsehood that prior to 1788, nations existed on this continent. They didn’t. This is a foreign notion, an activist device imported from Canada that does not reflect the reality of Australian history. I remind the Senate of the promise made by leading voice campaigner Marcia Langton who promised no more ‘welcomes to country’ if the voice was rejected. We can only hope this promise is lived up to. Federal taxpayers forked out at least 45,000 dollars for these rituals the previous financial year, although I understand the figure could be much higher as not every government department has come clean on what they spend. It’s not even an genuine pre-settlement ritual for most aborigines. It was invented in 1976 by Ernie Dingo and Richard Walley. I acknowledge Narungga elder Kerry White from South Australia, a great contributor to the ‘no’ campaign, who said these rituals are not even being used correctly. She said last year that it should be reserved for indigenous people welcoming other indigenous people to local country, and that its use by non-indigenous Australians was just virtue-signalling. She wasn’t wrong about the virtue-signalling, that’s for sure. Ms White said: “…they’ve taken our ceremonial process and demeaned it by throwing it out there every day in every aspect of what Australian people do. And I think that is culturally wrong.” She even said ‘welcomes to country’ were an attack on indigenous culture. I also acknowledge another indigenous leader of the ‘no’ campaign, Senator Naminjimpa Price, who said recently that ‘welcomes to country’ were “definitely divisive”. I’m confident I speak for the majority of Australians in saying I wish Professor Langton had included acknowledgements of country too. They’re recited at the beginning of every parliamentary sitting day, every council meeting, and every zoom meeting held by public servants. We hear them at the conclusion of every domestic flight – you can hear the groans in the cabin every time. They have effectively lost all meaning for their constant repetition. To foster national unity, and to help put an end to racial division in this country, it’s time to leave indigenous rituals to indigenous Australians. One Nation is supremely confident we speak for the majority of all Australians regardless of race when we call for an end to welcomes and acknowledgements of country. We know that for many, the promise of an end to them motivated their no vote at the referendum. We call on this Parliament, all other Australian parliaments, all government departments, and every local government in this nation, to stop signalling virtue you don’t possess and stop dividing this country by abusing these indigenous rituals. Australians don’t want them. Australians don’t want racial division, and they said that most emphatically on 14 October at the referendum. Let’s move forward together as one people, one nation under one flag.

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

159,069 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Dr. Abdul Wahid On Why He Doesn't Like The Palestine Flag. 🇵🇸 • Dr. Abdul Wahid lost his job as a doctor after Zionists complained about him calling out (bravely and clearly) the genocide occurring in Gaza during an appearance on the Pierce Morgan Show. "I truly recognize that many Muslims who wave the Palestine flag do so in solidarity with the Palestinian people. I won't criticize them for that. When you understand things differently, you will understand why I don't wave a Palestinian flag. Firstly, I don't wave the flag of any nation-state. I don't wave the flag of Pakistan; I don't wave the flag of Iraq; I don't wave the flag of the Syrian resistance. Flags represent nation-states, and the politics of those nation-states demand that loyalty to the flag is greater than loyalty to Allah/God – a model I can't accept. Secondly, the colours of the Palestine flag symbolize the Arab Revolt. The British approached the Sharif of Mecca with this flag, claiming it represented the Abbasids and Umayyads. Thus, the British Foreign Office proposed this idea to the traitorous Sharif Hussein, who rebelled against the Ottoman Empire. Consequently, the flag of the Arab Revolt is almost identical to the Palestinian flag, with only slight differences in colour order and shape. Subsequently, these colours were adopted by Arab nations following World War I. Colours associated with Arab nationalism became synonymous with Palestine, leading the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization – essentially nationalist socialists) to adopt it as their symbol. Given this understanding, it's not easy for me as a Muslim to accept waving that flag. However, I know that most Muslims who wave the Palestinian flag are not doing so because they believe in nation-states or a secular future for Palestine. Instead, many do it out of genuine love for the Palestinian people and a desire to have a symbol to express that sentiment. Personally, I think it sends the wrong message; Masjid Al-Aqsa is a better symbol for us." Abdul Wahid

Akbar Zab

70,768 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Australia’s immigration system is broken. It no longer works in the interests of the Australian people. Immigration policy from both parties of government – Labor and the Coalition – does not reflect the views of the Australian people. It’s driven by big business and used to prop up an economy brought low by poor government decisions. Poll after poll after poll shows most Australians think immigration is too high, or should be lowered. A staggering 1.4 million people have been brought to Australia since Labor won power in 2022. That’s more than the entire population of Adelaide, our fifth largest city. There has never been such a massive increase in our population in all our history. Last year I called for a national plebiscite on immigration to determine the views of the Australian people once and for all. Labor, the Coalition and the Greens blocked it. This showed they do not care about the Australian people’s views on immigration. It showed they do not care about the increasing numbers of Australians struggling to find secure accommodation, struggling to afford increasing rents, or trying to survive on the streets. It showed they don’t care about about the inflation caused by high immigration, or its overwhelming impact on services and infrastructure. I care, because I’m an Australian fighting for a decent standard of living for myself, my family and the Australians relying on me to fight for them. One Nation listens to the Australian people on immigration, and we develop our policies accordingly. Late last year the Department of Home Affairs revealed more than 75 thousand visa holders were in Australia illegally. Under our policy, all of them would be deported immediately. Under our policy, they would not be able to appeal their deportation to the Australian Review Tribunal. During the previous two financial years, just over 1.4 million people came to Australia courtesy of the Albanese Labor government – an average of 700 thousand per year. These numbers are obscene. One Nation will cap arrivals at 130 thousand per year – a drop of 570,000 per year from Labor’s record numbers. This will allow Australia to catch its breath, catch up with housing, and catch up with services and infrastructure. One Nation’s policy introduces a minimum eight-year waiting period for immigrants before they can apply for Australian citizenship and the privileges that come with it. Over this eight-year period, immigrants will be required to consistently demonstrate they are fit to become Australians. We want to reinforce the principle that Australian citizenship is a privilege to be earned, not an entitlement to be given away. Foreign students will be included in our 130 thousand per year cap. Australian universities must be broken of their addiction to foreign students, and forced to prioritise the tertiary education of Australian students. With modern communications technology, there is no compelling reason why most of these students can’t do Australian courses at home unless, of course, you factor in the amount of money they send back home from Australia. In 2023 this figure was 10 billion dollars. It’s a scam to take jobs and wealth from Australians, and we’re going to put a stop to it. One Nation’s policy will also stop those on student visas from using the system as a backdoor to permanent residency, and we’ll prevent students from bringing family members here. Our policy also demands the reinstatement of temporary protection visas and Australia’s withdrawal from the UN Refugee Convention. TPVs are a proven means of deterring people smuggling, stopping the boats and those arriving by plane. Labor is keeping things quiet, but it’s well known the people smugglers are constantly testing our borders and more boats have made it to the mainland in recent months. Under our policy, immigration from nations known to foster extremism will be prohibited. The major parties failure to screen out extremists at the border is directly responsible for the unrest and violence we’ve seen on our streets and in our suburbs. One Nation is the only party with a strong immigration policy that reflects the will of the Australian people. That’s because we’re the only party that puts Australia and Australians first.

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

32,433 просмотров • 1 год назад