Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

24,530 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Arc509's profile picture
Arc5091 year ago

Congrats on getting your own little bint I guess

ꓕNIOԀꓤƎ⅁⅁Iꓤꓕ's profile picture
ꓕNIOԀꓤƎ⅁⅁Iꓤꓕ1 year ago

Akemi Derangement Syndrome

Schwackadoo's profile picture
Schwackadoo1 year ago

These people will not stop until everyone is as miserable as they are, so do your part and just laugh in their faces

Riley ✝ 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿's profile picture
Riley ✝ 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿1 year ago

Dude be like:

✩Otaku The Great✩ Gr8 1 (ジャーメイン)'s profile picture
✩Otaku The Great✩ Gr8 1 (ジャーメイン)1 year ago

That pussy bloked be cause i owned his dumb ass istg these people need to grow up

Omar's profile picture
Omar1 year ago

"I just don't hold conversations with 0 IQ people" As they endlessly screams into the void, huffing their own farts.

Malcolm Laing's profile picture
Malcolm Laing1 year ago

True unemployed behaviour lmao

Rock Paper Sizzle's profile picture
Rock Paper Sizzle1 year ago

🇺🇸 One Nation, under Trump, Stronger THAN EVER. Are you Trump Tough? 💪Tough T's Here:

gatorfornicator's profile picture
gatorfornicator1 year ago

Legit kinda concerned for bro. Him, Bint, Nyara, the whole crew really. Their world view is…. Sad 😞

So Zased's profile picture
So Zased1 year ago

He blocked me after I showed him like 1 article that proved him wrong LMAO

Related Videos

More Shocking Fake News, Disinformation, and Leftist Propaganda from the ABC Once again, the ABC has deceived Australians, airing the totally unchallenged false claim that net immigration of around 300,000 people creates a "surplus" of housing. This is classic dog-whistling to leftist activists who desperately want to deny the obvious link between excessive immigration and Australia’s housing crisis. The ABC’s false claim rests on the flawed premise that Australia is building 175,000 "new" homes per year. At an average occupancy of 2.4 people per home, this supposedly covers the needs of 300,000 net migrants (requiring only ~125,000 homes), leaving a supposed "surplus" of housing enabling migration rates to be increased, Such reporting is fundamentally dishonest. 🟠FIRST, it ignores the fact that we must also provide new housing for the natural population growth—not just new migrants. According to the latest ABS figures for the year ending September 2024 (or closest available), net overseas migration was approximately 311,000, while natural increase added another 112,600 people. That totals 423,600 additional people needing housing. At 2.4 people per dwelling, Australia required around 176,500 new homes just to keep pace—meaning the claimed "surplus" (based in building 175,000 "new" homes) is at best an illusion. 🟠SECOND using the ABS’s 175,000 "new" homes figure is grossly misleading because this number includes knock-down rebuilds (KDRs) that do NOT increase overall housing supply. ABS data shows that between July 2019 and June 2025, 19.2% of "new" dwellings approved were knock-down rebuilds that simply replaced existing housing. Applying that rate, the real net addition to housing stock was only about 141,400 homes—well short of the 176,500 needed. This leaves a shortfall of roughly 35,000 homes in that year alone. In equivalent terms, that’s like an excess migration intake of around 84,000 people (before even addressing the backlog from previous years of under-supply). 🟠Yet the ABC pushed the exact opposite of the truth, deceiving viewers into believing there was a housing surplus. No doubt many of their gullible leftist audience clapped along like trained seals. The ABC’s persistent disinformation on migration and housing is actively preventing Australians from having an informed national debate. By peddling these half-truths and omissions, they shield failed policies from scrutiny and exacerbate the very crisis they pretend to report on. 🟠The ABC needs to be defunded. Taxpayers should not be forced to subsidise this kind of biased, misleading journalism.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

22,022 views • 2 months ago

After the ICE shooting last week in Minnesota, Black Lives Matter MN gave a speech demanding justice and ranting about ICE. Renee Good wasn’t Black, so why is BLM giving a press conference about her? It’s because BLM was never about Black Americans; it’s about revolution. Most became familiar with BLM post-George Floyd where they were able to attach themselves to his death. But Black Lives Matter is not a black organization, it’s a communist organization using Black people’s images as cover. It was hard for people to see this in 2020 since emotions were so high and they allowed communists to speak for the life of the average Black American. They were given the microphone to portray my existence is inevitably deprived simply due to my skin color. However, I recognized early on their tactics and why they were pushing such a strong message and condemnation of America. Communists use propaganda like a weapon and they take truth to gain legitimacy so they can manipulate you into believing the lies that will come later. Good propaganda, like a good conspiracy, needs an ounce of truth to push heavy loads of exaggerations and falsehoods down the line. It’s why their talking points sometimes land with people who aren’t familiar with their tactics. Sure, you can talk about slavery, Jim Crow, or any other historical mess and you can analyze it. However, their objective isn’t to recognize our historical wrongs for a better future: It’s to use it as a reason to tear down America. There are reasons they use words like “institutional” or “systemic” because their hatred goes past an individual to the collective. They are collectivists who hold all guilty if they are tacitly part of that collective. It’s why they say you benefited from “White Supremacy” because no matter how good of a person you are, you will always be tainted with historical stains. And you don’t have to be White to be a White Supremacist because if you defend the institutions they want to dismantle, you are automatically part of that collective. Good propagandists use everything to their advantage and they know that there is a social guilt about what has been done to Black Americans. It’s a point of leverage to get normal people to concede to communistic demands. They will always use Black Communists to speak for the collective and tribal nature over time has convinced us that communistic symbolism, like the raised fist in the air, is in fact Black in nature because we saw some dudes in afros doing it on old film. They’d have you think that the Black Panthers were popular and admired by Black Americans, when they weren’t. They were fringe, radical communists who were constantly shouting for revolution. They hid behind the imagery of being some type of militant neighborhood watch but every communist’s goal is to destroy the current system to instill theirs. They don’t care that it’s a tall mountain to climb because they enjoy being martyrs for a cause. The ends always justify the means for them, so lying and misrepresenting is fine as long as it pushes us closer to revolution. They will hijack trusted institutions, like government or churches, and use this inherent trust like a skin suit tricking unsuspecting people to believe what they want you to believe. This is no different from Black Lives Matter. For most people, it’s enough to see some angry black people on stage yelling about justice to convince them that this is the demeanor or demand of the average Black American in America. Black people like me stand in the way of their cause and when we speak out against them, they’ll call me the sellout for wanting to preserve the positives of American life. We are in or around the demoralization phase of revolution. They don’t need the support of Americans to be in support of their cause or to do anything to overtly support them. They just need enough people to sit on their hands while targeting institutions of power to either destroy from the outside or infiltrate to dismantle from within. Renee Good is their martyr, just as George Floyd was in 2020. You don’t have to knowingly sacrifice yourself or even be a communist to be a martyr for them; hijacking identities, especially dead ones, are perfect for manipulating the public. They will instigate events, cause chaos and when something goes awry, they’ll use it against us. This is exactly what’s happening in Minnesota with ICE. ICE could operate under normal conditions like it does everywhere else but they’ve turned non-newsworthy apprehensions into a spectacle so that it taints their image so they can force incidents exactly like Renee Good’s death. Now, when there are riots, it’s ICE’s fault and not the heavily funded leftist organizations who financially exist because of adversarial foreign nations who can’t wait till the United States is demoted from its power position. They are agitators at their core, they will use all goodwill to their advantage and strangle us with our own niceness. They will poke and prod our society, forcing you to question everything you held as sacred so they can replace it with something that suits them. Communist agitators are dying for Black Americans to be convinced that this somehow is negatively impacting us and they will propel any black face to make this happen. God help us if a black communist gets killed while provoking a response from ICE. Black Lives Matter Global and Minnesota doesn’t give a damn about Black people it can’t use to further a revolution. They’re not a Black advocacy group; they’re a communist outfit that gallivants in blackface.

Adam B. Coleman, Proud Father & Imperfect Man

83,689 views • 6 months ago

Hope Not Hate is a far left activist group that works with the Labour Party and British intelligence services to smear Labour’s opponents (and anyone to the right of Stalin) as “far right”. One of its senior staff members, Liron Velleman, was sentenced last week for child sex offences. (The others have not yet been caught). As well as being part of Hope Not Hate, Liron was also a Labour Party politician. I mean you can’t say the warning signs weren’t there. The only thing he’s missing from the full paedophile CV is being a BBC presenter. Despite being a demonstrable danger to children, Liron Velleman wasn’t given a jail sentence; his sentence was suspended, so he walked free from the court (he was spotted in the pub afterwards having a celebratory drink with his parents). This is an unusually lenient sentence for such crimes. I have so many questions. > Hope Not Hate specialise in online monitoring - they monitored my online presence, until they realised I’d hit puberty. Did Liron use the techniques and equipment provided to him by Hope Not Hate to commit his crimes? > Why is an organisation that’s so blatantly a political smear campaign group run by the Labour Party able to present itself as a non-partisan “anti fascist” organisation? > Why does an organisation that positions itself as a moral arbiter have so many sex offenders and violent criminals on its books? Other Hope Not Hate staff members have admitted to crimes such as attacking women with hammers. > Why is taxpayers’ money given to this shower of shite? But I’m going to look at why so many left-wing activists are paedophiles. Remember when Kyle Rittenhouse defended himself during a Black Lives Matter riot and shot three random left-wing rioters who were attacking him? It turned out that one of them was a convicted paedophile and another one was convicted of violence against women. Why were two out of three of the left-wing activists, the purest of the pure, who call themselves Antifa fighting against the scourge of “fascism”, objectively terrible people? THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND LEFTIST DEVIANCE There’s a psychological term “moral licensing”, where people who think that they’re doing good feel that their virtuosity gives them some sort of credit, a deposit of good karma, that then entitles them to do something bad later, as if the universe owes them. Similarly, psychologists use the term “moral cleansing”, the psychological tendency of people to engage in good deeds to restore their moral self-worth after committing an immoral act or correct some malevolent fault. So paedophiles like Liron Velleman think that working for Hope Not Hate will offset their crimes. By doing what they perceive as “good” or presenting themselves as virtuous, they will reset the balance, or build up credits they can spend noncing kids. It goes deeper than that. The essence of leftism is to prioritise the communal above individual rights, so nobody has autonomy over their bodies. We use our bodies to work, to earn money. Leftists don’t believe that the individual should own the fruits of their labour. They think that this effort, anything produced by it, is the property of the state. Extreme leftists see themselves as emblems of the state, so feel entitled to take this for themselves, whether that’s as money, as slavery (as we see under communist regimes) or, at the extreme end, as child abuse. Look how unconcerned leftists are about paedophilia, how they talk about grooming gangs. They excuse the crimes and accuse anyone who campaigns on behalf of the girls of being “grifters” because nobody on the left can even envisage that somebody might authentically be repulsed by these crimes. They think that the only possible motivation is financial. And we should remember that left-wing people are all spiteful communist mutants motivated by envy and hatred and are disgustingly ugly. Look at the boss of Hope Not Hate, Nick Lowles, who employs paedophiles, communists, men who attack women. As Wittgenstein said, morality and aesthetics are the same. PAEDOPHILES SEEK ESTABLISHMENT POWER And we also need to look at why Liron Velleman got such a lenient sentence. We know that the establishment is biased towards itself, and Liron was part of the establishment. Paedophiles - such as Jimmy Savile, Rolf Harris and those in the church - tend to move themselves close to power and authority to give themselves the opportunity to commit their crimes, and also the influence to cover those crimes up. Liron Velleman was so embedded in the establishment that he even helped draft the government’s Online Safety Bill, a piece of legislation aimed at keeping children safe on the internet. This is like Jeffrey Epstein drafting a babysitting bill. If you want to keep children safe online, you’d statistically have a higher impact if you locked up everyone who helped draft the Online Safety Bill. While sentencing, Liron’s judge even said that a mitigating factor was that he was a Labour councillor? How is that a mitigating factor? That’s a big red flag right there, and that red flag has a hammer and sickle on it. Look how entitled Liron felt to protection from the establishment. After his trial, he went for a celebratory drink with his parents in a local pub. Someone spotted him and confronted him. Liron’s party immediately called the police on the man filming adults in a public place. They know the police will take this very seriously. That’s exactly what the police are there for. Not for protecting children in Rotherham, but for protecting an establishment nonce being spoken to in public. Look at the bizarrely, incongruously harsh sentences handed down to people on the right, such as Sam Melia, who was jailed printing and distributing stickers that said such awful things as “It’s OK to be white”. And Lucy Connolly, who tweeted then deleted her indifference to hotels containing migrants being burnt down “for all I care”. This insane focus on the supposed “far-right” doesn’t make sense. I’d feel much more comfortable leaving my children in the care of an average far-right bigot than the average far-left activist. I think we need to recalibrate our morality.

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

69,758 views • 3 months ago