Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

24,530 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

10 Yorum

Arc509 profil fotoğrafı
Arc5091 yıl önce

Congrats on getting your own little bint I guess

ꓕNIOԀꓤƎ⅁⅁Iꓤꓕ profil fotoğrafı
ꓕNIOԀꓤƎ⅁⅁Iꓤꓕ1 yıl önce

Akemi Derangement Syndrome

Schwackadoo profil fotoğrafı
Schwackadoo1 yıl önce

These people will not stop until everyone is as miserable as they are, so do your part and just laugh in their faces

Riley ✝ 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 profil fotoğrafı
Riley ✝ 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿1 yıl önce

Dude be like:

✩Otaku The Great✩ Gr8 1 (ジャーメイン) profil fotoğrafı
✩Otaku The Great✩ Gr8 1 (ジャーメイン)1 yıl önce

That pussy bloked be cause i owned his dumb ass istg these people need to grow up

Omar profil fotoğrafı
Omar1 yıl önce

"I just don't hold conversations with 0 IQ people" As they endlessly screams into the void, huffing their own farts.

Malcolm Laing profil fotoğrafı
Malcolm Laing1 yıl önce

True unemployed behaviour lmao

Rock Paper Sizzle profil fotoğrafı
Rock Paper Sizzle1 yıl önce

🇺🇸 One Nation, under Trump, Stronger THAN EVER. Are you Trump Tough? 💪Tough T's Here:

gatorfornicator profil fotoğrafı
gatorfornicator1 yıl önce

Legit kinda concerned for bro. Him, Bint, Nyara, the whole crew really. Their world view is…. Sad 😞

So Zased profil fotoğrafı
So Zased1 yıl önce

He blocked me after I showed him like 1 article that proved him wrong LMAO

Benzer Videolar

More Shocking Fake News, Disinformation, and Leftist Propaganda from the ABC Once again, the ABC has deceived Australians, airing the totally unchallenged false claim that net immigration of around 300,000 people creates a "surplus" of housing. This is classic dog-whistling to leftist activists who desperately want to deny the obvious link between excessive immigration and Australia’s housing crisis. The ABC’s false claim rests on the flawed premise that Australia is building 175,000 "new" homes per year. At an average occupancy of 2.4 people per home, this supposedly covers the needs of 300,000 net migrants (requiring only ~125,000 homes), leaving a supposed "surplus" of housing enabling migration rates to be increased, Such reporting is fundamentally dishonest. 🟠FIRST, it ignores the fact that we must also provide new housing for the natural population growth—not just new migrants. According to the latest ABS figures for the year ending September 2024 (or closest available), net overseas migration was approximately 311,000, while natural increase added another 112,600 people. That totals 423,600 additional people needing housing. At 2.4 people per dwelling, Australia required around 176,500 new homes just to keep pace—meaning the claimed "surplus" (based in building 175,000 "new" homes) is at best an illusion. 🟠SECOND using the ABS’s 175,000 "new" homes figure is grossly misleading because this number includes knock-down rebuilds (KDRs) that do NOT increase overall housing supply. ABS data shows that between July 2019 and June 2025, 19.2% of "new" dwellings approved were knock-down rebuilds that simply replaced existing housing. Applying that rate, the real net addition to housing stock was only about 141,400 homes—well short of the 176,500 needed. This leaves a shortfall of roughly 35,000 homes in that year alone. In equivalent terms, that’s like an excess migration intake of around 84,000 people (before even addressing the backlog from previous years of under-supply). 🟠Yet the ABC pushed the exact opposite of the truth, deceiving viewers into believing there was a housing surplus. No doubt many of their gullible leftist audience clapped along like trained seals. The ABC’s persistent disinformation on migration and housing is actively preventing Australians from having an informed national debate. By peddling these half-truths and omissions, they shield failed policies from scrutiny and exacerbate the very crisis they pretend to report on. 🟠The ABC needs to be defunded. Taxpayers should not be forced to subsidise this kind of biased, misleading journalism.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

22,022 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

This is peak first-world leftist delusion. This woman stands in a fully equipped American kitchen (fridge, stove, microwave, running water, electricity, AC-capable ceiling, TikTok lighting) and declares “we live in a 3rd world country” because her one-bedroom rent went from ~$700–800 five-to-ten years ago to $1,300 today, and because some people work long hours or share space. Every claim collapses on contact with reality. • The United States is not a third-world country by any metric that has ever mattered: GDP per capita, HDI, access to clean water, electricity, sanitation, medicine, food abundance, or personal safety relative to actual developing nations. Calling it one because rent rose is the economic equivalent of calling a five-star hotel a refugee camp because the minibar prices went up. • Rent increases are real and painful in many metro areas. They are driven by years of underbuilding, zoning that blocks supply, post-2020 demand shocks, inflation, and population growth—not by America suddenly becoming Haiti. National median rents did not double everywhere; high-cost coastal and Sun Belt pockets did. Plenty of places still have $700–900 one-bedrooms. Location and local policy matter. Pretending the entire country is unlivable is just incurious. • “I live with four people in a one-bedroom” is a personal choice and a crowding decision, not proof the country is third-world. Third-world housing shortages look like corrugated-metal shacks, open sewers, and multi-family rooms with no plumbing. Her living room has a sectional, curtains, framed art, and Amazon packages. • People staying in bad relationships or working 12–16-hour days to make rent is tragic when it happens. It is not unique to America, and it is not the median experience. The average U.S. workweek is still nowhere near 60–70 hours. Millions of people work normal schedules, change jobs, move to lower-cost areas, or take on roommates without descending into dystopia. Framing every tough budget as systemic enslavement is emotional blackmail, not analysis. • “You’re an ATM machine” and “are you living or surviving?” is the language of someone who has never experienced actual survival. Americans complain about rent while owning multiple streaming services, delivery apps, smartphones, gym memberships, tattoos, and the leisure time to film TikTok rants. That is not survival. That is first-world dissatisfaction dressed up as political insight. High housing costs are a legitimate policy failure in specific markets. Treating them as evidence that the richest large economy on Earth has become a failed state is unserious. It cheapens the term “third world,” insults people who actually live in them, and turns legitimate economic frustration into performative victimhood. If your standard of living includes reliable power, indoor plumbing, a smartphone, and the freedom to post about how oppressed you are, you are not living in a third-world country. You are living in a first-world country with expensive apartments and an internet connection that lets you complain about it to millions. That’s not oppression. That’s abundance with a rent receipt. Now hand me a cigarette. It’s the only way I can deal with these people.

DocumentingLibs

76,342 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

After the ICE shooting last week in Minnesota, Black Lives Matter MN gave a speech demanding justice and ranting about ICE. Renee Good wasn’t Black, so why is BLM giving a press conference about her? It’s because BLM was never about Black Americans; it’s about revolution. Most became familiar with BLM post-George Floyd where they were able to attach themselves to his death. But Black Lives Matter is not a black organization, it’s a communist organization using Black people’s images as cover. It was hard for people to see this in 2020 since emotions were so high and they allowed communists to speak for the life of the average Black American. They were given the microphone to portray my existence is inevitably deprived simply due to my skin color. However, I recognized early on their tactics and why they were pushing such a strong message and condemnation of America. Communists use propaganda like a weapon and they take truth to gain legitimacy so they can manipulate you into believing the lies that will come later. Good propaganda, like a good conspiracy, needs an ounce of truth to push heavy loads of exaggerations and falsehoods down the line. It’s why their talking points sometimes land with people who aren’t familiar with their tactics. Sure, you can talk about slavery, Jim Crow, or any other historical mess and you can analyze it. However, their objective isn’t to recognize our historical wrongs for a better future: It’s to use it as a reason to tear down America. There are reasons they use words like “institutional” or “systemic” because their hatred goes past an individual to the collective. They are collectivists who hold all guilty if they are tacitly part of that collective. It’s why they say you benefited from “White Supremacy” because no matter how good of a person you are, you will always be tainted with historical stains. And you don’t have to be White to be a White Supremacist because if you defend the institutions they want to dismantle, you are automatically part of that collective. Good propagandists use everything to their advantage and they know that there is a social guilt about what has been done to Black Americans. It’s a point of leverage to get normal people to concede to communistic demands. They will always use Black Communists to speak for the collective and tribal nature over time has convinced us that communistic symbolism, like the raised fist in the air, is in fact Black in nature because we saw some dudes in afros doing it on old film. They’d have you think that the Black Panthers were popular and admired by Black Americans, when they weren’t. They were fringe, radical communists who were constantly shouting for revolution. They hid behind the imagery of being some type of militant neighborhood watch but every communist’s goal is to destroy the current system to instill theirs. They don’t care that it’s a tall mountain to climb because they enjoy being martyrs for a cause. The ends always justify the means for them, so lying and misrepresenting is fine as long as it pushes us closer to revolution. They will hijack trusted institutions, like government or churches, and use this inherent trust like a skin suit tricking unsuspecting people to believe what they want you to believe. This is no different from Black Lives Matter. For most people, it’s enough to see some angry black people on stage yelling about justice to convince them that this is the demeanor or demand of the average Black American in America. Black people like me stand in the way of their cause and when we speak out against them, they’ll call me the sellout for wanting to preserve the positives of American life. We are in or around the demoralization phase of revolution. They don’t need the support of Americans to be in support of their cause or to do anything to overtly support them. They just need enough people to sit on their hands while targeting institutions of power to either destroy from the outside or infiltrate to dismantle from within. Renee Good is their martyr, just as George Floyd was in 2020. You don’t have to knowingly sacrifice yourself or even be a communist to be a martyr for them; hijacking identities, especially dead ones, are perfect for manipulating the public. They will instigate events, cause chaos and when something goes awry, they’ll use it against us. This is exactly what’s happening in Minnesota with ICE. ICE could operate under normal conditions like it does everywhere else but they’ve turned non-newsworthy apprehensions into a spectacle so that it taints their image so they can force incidents exactly like Renee Good’s death. Now, when there are riots, it’s ICE’s fault and not the heavily funded leftist organizations who financially exist because of adversarial foreign nations who can’t wait till the United States is demoted from its power position. They are agitators at their core, they will use all goodwill to their advantage and strangle us with our own niceness. They will poke and prod our society, forcing you to question everything you held as sacred so they can replace it with something that suits them. Communist agitators are dying for Black Americans to be convinced that this somehow is negatively impacting us and they will propel any black face to make this happen. God help us if a black communist gets killed while provoking a response from ICE. Black Lives Matter Global and Minnesota doesn’t give a damn about Black people it can’t use to further a revolution. They’re not a Black advocacy group; they’re a communist outfit that gallivants in blackface.

Adam B. Coleman, Proud Father & Imperfect Man

83,689 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce