Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Axel Rudakubana committed an evil crime. Yet he was given a kettle which he allegedly used to attack a prison officer. I don’t care if he never has a hot drink again - and nor do the public. No more appeasement. The Justice Secretary must act now before an...

596,148 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

8 Kommentare

Profilbild von JoePublic2017
JoePublic2017vor 1 Jahr

Robert is doing some good stuff these days.

Profilbild von Lord Talbot
Lord Talbotvor 1 Jahr

Bread and water.

Profilbild von RocknTrollForever
RocknTrollForevervor 1 Jahr

He needs the death sentence. Let's be real about these 'people'.

Profilbild von Dan
Danvor 1 Jahr

I'd rather he wasn't alive to do such things. We shouldn't need to spend money on him.

Profilbild von Prescott Ramsey
Prescott Ramseyvor 1 Jahr

@RobertJenrick You have to Join reform and be the next Home Secretary? 👊 @reformparty_uk #ReformUK

Profilbild von Darcie Boo
Darcie Boovor 1 Jahr

Well said Mr Jenrick 👏 prison for terrorists, murderers, rapists and pedophiles should mean complete segregation, no privileges, no jobs, just lockdown 23 hours a day with 1 hour to exercise and wash.

Profilbild von SwordOfDamocles561
SwordOfDamocles561vor 1 Jahr

Just fry him like the chicken nuggets that are apparently so good in this country they're a human right.

Profilbild von The Duke of Deira
The Duke of Deiravor 1 Jahr

Didn't you lot let him into the country with the genocidal parent or was that the other cheek of the Uniparty arse?

Ähnliche Videos

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.

Giggling Ganon

194,059 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten