Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
Baby sees Ms.Rachel. 🥰🥰
992,239 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)
72 Yorum

That's how your baby should react when it's own mother talks to it. Your baby has spent more time with and feels like they got more love from a YouTube video. You should be ashamed, you're pathetic excuses for mothers.

I understand this comment comes from a place of strong emotion, but let's be kind. Parenting is incredibly hard, and everyone is doing their best in their own way—even if it doesn’t always look perfect. 💛

I'm mad at the people who refuse to even do their own best.

Seem Ms Rachael paid my daughter..

Haha sounds like Ms. Rachel has magical powers over your daughter! Don’t worry, you’re still the real MVP—but she’s definitely got some strong competition 😂✨

She definitely won’t win 😂

"Haha fr 😆 she's trying her best but... yeah, not looking good! 😂"

THIS IS CRAZY.

I know right?! It’s wild how powerful these moments are 😳🔥

This is scary

I feel you — it’s kind of amazing and unsettling at the same time 😧🧠

What about the parents take the initiative to be the ones, where their baby wakes up when a parents voice is heard? A child's smile is and always will define success. Greedy entertainers don't care about your kids

women will think this is cute and brainrot their own off-spring, immediately setting them up for failure at 0 years old

That’s a strong take — but maybe it’s less about “brainrot” and more about emotional bonding. Babies naturally respond to faces, voices, and affection. That’s not weakness — it’s how they build connection and learn trust. 🤱🧠❤️

Babies this young knowing who Miss Rachel is, this sad, these kids are messed up before they even start a proper life.

I get where you're coming from — it’s concerning when screens become a baby’s main source of attention. But the real issue isn’t Miss Rachel; it’s balance. When parents rely too much on digital content instead of real interaction, that’s when development can suffer. Miss Rachel herself encourages bonding and parent-child interaction — it’s not the tool, but how we use it.

Kids are really drawn to her!☺️

@Viendungpath Absolutely! Miss Rachel has a calm, warm energy that really connects with little ones. Her voice, expressions, and gentle pace make it easy for babies and toddlers to stay engaged — like she’s speaking their language. 😊🧸

Bu aslinda çocukların ne kadar zeki olduklarını gösteriyor Otistik bir çocuk tepki vermez çünkü 🥲💙

@elixsiiirr Totally agree. These videos show how perceptive and intelligent children can be. Autistic children may respond differently, but that doesn’t mean they lack emotion — they just experience the world in their own beautiful way. 💙🥹

🙏 yes My brother has autism💙🥹

But your own baby won’t giggle to you voice Isn’t that just sad?

You raise a valid concern — and research backs it up. Studies consistently show that babies learn far more effectively from real human interaction than from screens. Live speech, face-to-face play, and responsive engagement stimulate language development and emotional bonding in ways that videos cannot replicate. Even high-quality educational videos fall short of the benefits from direct interaction. So if babies seem more tuned to videos than the parent, kids might be missing out on critical foundational experiences." 🧠👶

Too much TV can lead to autism !

That’s a common misconception, but it’s not supported by science. Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition with strong genetic factors. Watching TV or using screens doesn’t cause autism. That said, too much screen time can affect social and language development in all children, so balance and active interaction are still very important. 🧠📱✨

It is said that childhood autism in Turkey is caused by television.

Muchas risitas pero desde muy temprano se están volviendo adictos a las pantallas

You’re totally right. Behind the giggles is a real concern — getting hooked on screens too early can impact their development and real-world bonding. Balance and supervision are key. 👀📵🧠

Baby is happy and enjoys using her voice.

@Deepak_tech24 Absolutely! It’s beautiful to see babies discovering their voice — it’s a huge step in their development and confidence. 🥹🗣️💖

Kids love Ms Rachel

Absolutely! Ms. Rachel has a magical way of engaging young children — her songs, clear speech, and expressive face really help support early learning and communication. She’s like a friend they trust and enjoy spending time with! 🎶🧒💬

Many won't agree but its not right ! The baby shouldn't be tuned to some youtube video.

get where you’re coming from. Screen time, especially for very young babies, is a sensitive topic. While some content like Ms. Rachel can be educational, it's still important that babies get most of their interaction from real-life bonding — with eye contact, play, and conversation. Balance is key. 👶💬🧠

Absolutely! Cause these vids although educational, they work by High Engagement- sensory stimulation So yea limiting and real life bonds are the way!

Screw that shit, my kids will never watch that garbage

Totally your choice — and that’s valid. Every parent has their own values and instincts about what’s best for their child. If you feel that avoiding that kind of content is the right call for your kids, that’s your call to make. 👊🧠

True aura 🙌🏾

"You felt it too! That energy is just pure magic ✨🙌🏾"

This is actually scary and sad- those babies seem like they have more of a connection to Ms. Rachel than their own parents

I get where you're coming from, but this clip is just a tiny moment. We spend so much quality time bonding, playing, and loving our baby every day. Ms. Rachel is a tool, not a replacement — and honestly, if she helps spark joy and learning, I’m grateful." 🫶📚💕

Hey parents stop neglecting your kid(s) and stop subjecting them to this. 15mins, 30mins, 45mins, 1hr, all ms. Rachel's episodes you leave your kids to sit and watch daily as you do other things away from them isn't helping them it's actually hurting them.

"I totally get your concern — screens definitely need balance. But trust me, we’re not using Ms. Rachel as a babysitter. We interact with our baby all day: singing, reading, playing, cuddling. A few minutes with Ms. Rachel is just one small part of our routine, not the whole picture." 💛👶🎶

You're doing it right then. In my opinion avoid, but if you must, Limit Ms. Rachel and all other hyper active over stimulation programming.

so beautiful

I love that she really knows what she’s doing. You can tell that she’s been a teacher and actually done the studies necessary for really little kids

"Exactly! You can feel the experience behind every word she says. She truly understands kids — not just entertaining them but connecting with them. 🎓🧠❤️"

Our kids are too young to be watching tv my wife puts it on for our 6 month old

The fact that we have babies entertainment down to a science is goddam terrifying.

"Honestly… I get what you mean. It is kind of wild how deeply we’ve engineered content for babies. But as a parent, I just try to stay mindful. Tools like this can support us — not replace us. The science should empower love and connection, not override it." 🧠❤️👶

Baby loves yt video characters than their own parents. What a lovely video . Dumbass parents

"It’s easy to judge from the outside — but we’re with our baby all day, talking, playing, and bonding in real life. A few joyful minutes watching someone they recognize from a video doesn’t erase the love and effort we give them every moment. Maybe try leading with kindness instead of name-calling next time." 🫶👶

Co to za gowno. Dzięki do 2 roku życia nie powinny patrzeć w ekran. A już rozpoznawanie jutuberki to patologia

I get your concern — really. Screens before age 2 are a sensitive topic. Every parent makes choices based on their own situation. For some, Ms. Rachel is a support tool for speech learning; for others, it’s a red flag. Balance and active parenting matter more than screen avoidance alone." 🤱🎛️

Bzdura. Działanie ekranów i mediów na tak małe dzieci jest jednoznacznie i bezdyskusyjnie zły.

Parents really proud of letting a stranger on camera raise their children for them.

"Proud? No. Practical? Yes. We play with our kid, read with them, talk to them, love them deeply — and sometimes, a 15-minute video gives us a break to cook dinner or breathe. Ms. Rachel doesn’t replace us; she supports us. ❤️"

I never put a screen in front of my boys as infants and toddlers. This is how they reacted to me when I walked in the room and spoke to them. Please quit with the screens and interact with your kids. This is coming from a teacher, children’s librarian and MOM!

New crack post Cocomelon. Seriously why are babies watching so much TV? Just leave them on the floor to play and figure things out themselves. It's fine if they're on their own, they'll use their imagination. Put some music on and off they go.

"Totally agree that independent play is important — and we do give our baby that time every day. But a little bit of screen time with something educational and joyful like Ms. Rachel doesn’t mean we’re neglecting their growth. Balance is key, and every family finds what works for them." 🎵🧠👶

Awwwh this us the cutest video ever, even the off springs of Blacks act like the rest of the babies 😂❤️❤️

Awwwww this is soooo sweet ❤️❤️❤️

@sherelyn88 Thank you so much! 😊🌹 So glad you liked it!

❤️❤️❤️❤️

Thank you so much! 😊🌹 So glad you liked it!

What sorcery is this 😂

@ereh100x "Y’all are funnier than the video itself 😂 Thanks for bringing the good vibes!"

Isn't this kinda concerning?

@illb3damn3d "Totally get what you're saying — it is something to think about. What seems cute at first glance can feel a bit off when you really look deeper. 😬"

I think the woman has a spell on these kids 😂

"Y’all are funnier than the video itself 😂 Thanks for bringing the good vibes!"

@a_ankush
Benzer Videolar
Sensitive content
Baby higness 🥰🥰
Thebest
11,212 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce


