正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

👀 Back in 2011 this guy used an old Texas adverse possession law (which requires 10 years of continuous occupation) to claim an abandoned $330k house in Flower Mound. He filed an affidavit for just $16, moved in with his furniture, put up a “no trespassing” sign, and even...

78,906 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Restaurateur Jeff Zalaznick says the "most iconic sign in fine dining" only exists because an angry former tenant shattered the original out of spite: “The sign is a crazy story.” “We'd been looking for a space for Carbone for over a year.” “One day a guy came up to me and said, ‘I think I have a space you might be interested in.’” “As we're walking up the block, I look at him and say, ‘We'll take it.’ Just from seeing the sign.” “The place is a mess. It hasn't been maintained in years. There's some old Italian guy in the corner smoking cigarettes that's been there not paying rent for six months.” “We put in the lease that we needed the sign. The sign had to stay. It didn't seem like a big ask.” “It's this old sign that says ‘Rocco Wines & Liquor.’” “Right before we were going to execute it, I get a phone call that the owner wants $10,000 for the sign to keep it there.” “Even though we gave him the money, in classic New York fashion, he was so angry that he was being removed, even though he hadn't paid rent in close to a year.” “When I show up on January 1st, there's shattered glass. All the neon had been shattered by him as like a ‘fuck you’ on the way out.” “After a few minutes, I'm like, I think this guy gave me the biggest gift he could have given me.” “We're going to keep this sign and instead we're going to put ‘Carbone’ in neon on top of the Rocco sign and put back the Wines and Liquor.” “And that became what is probably the most iconic sign in fine dining restaurants in the world.” “Only because he broke all those lights did it become the quintessential Carbone sign that it is.”

David Senra

235,562 次观看 • 1 个月前

I recently talked to Dr. Josef 🇺🇸 about this taboo question on American Thought Leaders 🇺🇸 with @JanJekielek. Here's what most people don't know about these drugs: “If you just look at the drug labels for Adderall and Ritalin, in the Warnings and Precautions, it already lists aggression and hostility. …If you look at SSRIs, it already lists there in the label that they increase the risk of suicidal behavior. It lists hostility, agitation and violence. If you look at Abilify, which is an anti-psychotic, homicidal ideation is already in there. …Time and time again, we've seen this go through the court system, and judges and juries have found that this has been involved. Perhaps the most well-known case of this was a case in Wyoming, and it involved a gentleman called Don Schell. He was an older man, and he had been exposed to Prozac in the past, an SSRI, and he had an agitated response to it, and they stopped it quickly. His next doctor, who did not know that he had that history in the past, gave him a drug called Paxil. …Within a week, he killed his wife, he killed his daughter, and he killed his granddaughter, and then he shot himself. An unspeakable tragedy for the family. Now the surviving son-in-law—his daughter's husband and the father of the grandchild that he lost—brought suit…He was given a million dollar verdict. It was for failure to warn. …The same thing happened in Australia, a man strangled and killed his wife during a bad reaction to Paxil again. And the judge ruled there as well, if not for the drug, this wouldn't have happened.”

Jan Jekielek

49,435 次观看 • 9 个月前