Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Back in the 90s, self-defense instructor Bob Taylor demonstrated a "dirty" technique involving a mouthful of soda. In an instructional video for FightFast, he taught that if a confrontation seemed imminent while drinking, one should not swallow the liquid but hold it in their mouth. The moment the aggressor...

DoctorLemma's profile picture

Lemma the Optimist

428,526 subscribers

905,915 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

KomediEğitim
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

The stroller was left unattended for a moment and rolled itself to the edge of the platform, falling directly into an approaching train. Fortunately the baby was held in the arm before that.
0:16

The stroller was left unattended for a moment and rolled itself to the edge of the platform, falling directly into an approaching train. Fortunately the baby was held in the arm before that.

MIND & MACHINE

5,707,373 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

It is not true that the advantages of an AR are not relevant in a home defense situation. HOWEVER. It is *absolutely* true that there is a reason shotguns are storied as close-combat weapons, dating back to the age of the blunderbuss, and it's the one he cited.
0:14

It is not true that the advantages of an AR are not relevant in a home defense situation. HOWEVER. It is *absolutely* true that there is a reason shotguns are storied as close-combat weapons, dating back to the age of the blunderbuss, and it's the one he cited.

planefag

111,011 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

This prosecutor should be ashamed of himself for promoting such a fundamental mischaracterization of a defense attorney’s duties. Yesterday, in his closing argument in the trial of #EdrickFaust, elected district attorney Kalki Yalamanchili boldly stated that the defendant’s lawyer, Ahmad Crews, has the duty of “[making] sure, regardless of what the evidence is, that he does everything he possibly can to walk Mr. Faust out that door - even though he murdered Tara Baker.” This was (correctly) objected to immediately by Mr. Crews, but what Judge Lisa Lott did to remedy the statement remains unclear. Let me make this clear: defense lawyers are only under obligation to the Constitution. They are not intended to indiscriminately fight for the outcome of a client. They are, just as any other attorney, prohibited from fabricating evidence or information to mislead the court or a jury. Their job is to ensure the prosecution lawfully, and following rules of due process, proves its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Part of their job is to call into question the strength of the evidence against their clients, but not through stooping to the level of deception. The zealous defense of a client cannot be equated with immoral advocacy. It does not mean excusing crime, ignoring facts, or endorsing violence. Undermining and demonizing that role by portraying counsel as morally corrupt for doing his job pressures jurors to effectively punish defendants for the stigma associated with having defense counsel. If there are mistakes, prejudices, conflicts of interest, or any other reason to lose faith in an investigation, a defense attorney’s job is to bring it to the surface and hold the government to account rather than allow a defendant to be steamrolled into a wrongful conviction. Mr. Yalamanchili’s suggestion that defense counsel exists to defeat justice “regardless of the evidence” is an attack on the very elements of the justice he purportedly believes in…but he knows this already. #FreeEdrickFaust #JusticeforTaraBaker #Georgia
0:14

This prosecutor should be ashamed of himself for promoting such a fundamental mischaracterization of a defense attorney’s duties. Yesterday, in his closing argument in the trial of #EdrickFaust, elected district attorney Kalki Yalamanchili boldly stated that the defendant’s lawyer, Ahmad Crews, has the duty of “[making] sure, regardless of what the evidence is, that he does everything he possibly can to walk Mr. Faust out that door - even though he murdered Tara Baker.” This was (correctly) objected to immediately by Mr. Crews, but what Judge Lisa Lott did to remedy the statement remains unclear. Let me make this clear: defense lawyers are only under obligation to the Constitution. They are not intended to indiscriminately fight for the outcome of a client. They are, just as any other attorney, prohibited from fabricating evidence or information to mislead the court or a jury. Their job is to ensure the prosecution lawfully, and following rules of due process, proves its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Part of their job is to call into question the strength of the evidence against their clients, but not through stooping to the level of deception. The zealous defense of a client cannot be equated with immoral advocacy. It does not mean excusing crime, ignoring facts, or endorsing violence. Undermining and demonizing that role by portraying counsel as morally corrupt for doing his job pressures jurors to effectively punish defendants for the stigma associated with having defense counsel. If there are mistakes, prejudices, conflicts of interest, or any other reason to lose faith in an investigation, a defense attorney’s job is to bring it to the surface and hold the government to account rather than allow a defendant to be steamrolled into a wrongful conviction. Mr. Yalamanchili’s suggestion that defense counsel exists to defeat justice “regardless of the evidence” is an attack on the very elements of the justice he purportedly believes in…but he knows this already. #FreeEdrickFaust #JusticeforTaraBaker #Georgia

Britt Happens

12,856 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Palestinian women PRETEND to cry while filming a propaganda video claiming they have just lost a loved one on in an air strike. The women cannot hold back their laughter and smiles as they attempt to cry for the camera.
0:17

Palestinian women PRETEND to cry while filming a propaganda video claiming they have just lost a loved one on in an air strike. The women cannot hold back their laughter and smiles as they attempt to cry for the camera.

Oli London

6,894,255 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

In the center of Warsaw, a man kicked a Ukrainian woman so hard that she flew out of her shoes, writes the Polish newspaper Wyborcza Ukrainian Anna, who has lived in Poland since 2018, stopped near a parking lot and was talking on the phone. The girl did not notice that there was a car behind her that was trying to enter the parking space. A conflict arose, Anna used gas spray, for which she received a kick in the back. The publication notes that the police advised the woman not to report this incident and not to write a statement, since she could receive a counter-statement due to the use of gas spray. Police Press Service Representative Jakub Patsiniak confirmed that neither Anna nor the attacker filed official statements. However, the police seized a video recording from the scene and assured that the victim was explained her further rights and she herself refused to file an application.
0:10

In the center of Warsaw, a man kicked a Ukrainian woman so hard that she flew out of her shoes, writes the Polish newspaper Wyborcza Ukrainian Anna, who has lived in Poland since 2018, stopped near a parking lot and was talking on the phone. The girl did not notice that there was a car behind her that was trying to enter the parking space. A conflict arose, Anna used gas spray, for which she received a kick in the back. The publication notes that the police advised the woman not to report this incident and not to write a statement, since she could receive a counter-statement due to the use of gas spray. Police Press Service Representative Jakub Patsiniak confirmed that neither Anna nor the attacker filed official statements. However, the police seized a video recording from the scene and assured that the victim was explained her further rights and she herself refused to file an application.

NEXTA

990,993 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

This is not what we Ukrainians would want to see from our windows in winter. It would be better if the voices and laughter of children making snowmen or playing snowballs echoed from the courtyards of residential areas. One could step out onto the balcony and watch that very scene while sipping a warm tea or coffee, rather than the sights we see now. You cannot distract yourself from thoughts of the war for long; it continues, and everything around us tries to remind us of that. Over the years, the brain tries to pretend it has adapted to everything happening around it - to what the ears hear and the eyes see, to the various situations that occur here every day. But sanity is always on guard, and an inner voice says without words: this is not a normal life for a human being; if only everything could return to the way it was before. But is it even possible to return to the life we had, carrying such an experience on our shoulders? … Now, in the "points of warmth," you can see beds. You might ask: are these for overnight stays? The beds are intended for people who need assistance in the event of an emergency or for medical reasons, as well as for temporary rest if a person is in need of it… but people are still forced to return to their apartments.
0:18

This is not what we Ukrainians would want to see from our windows in winter. It would be better if the voices and laughter of children making snowmen or playing snowballs echoed from the courtyards of residential areas. One could step out onto the balcony and watch that very scene while sipping a warm tea or coffee, rather than the sights we see now. You cannot distract yourself from thoughts of the war for long; it continues, and everything around us tries to remind us of that. Over the years, the brain tries to pretend it has adapted to everything happening around it - to what the ears hear and the eyes see, to the various situations that occur here every day. But sanity is always on guard, and an inner voice says without words: this is not a normal life for a human being; if only everything could return to the way it was before. But is it even possible to return to the life we had, carrying such an experience on our shoulders? … Now, in the "points of warmth," you can see beds. You might ask: are these for overnight stays? The beds are intended for people who need assistance in the event of an emergency or for medical reasons, as well as for temporary rest if a person is in need of it… but people are still forced to return to their apartments.

Katerina Horbunova

78,835 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Wondering if you are “quad dominant” in your throw and if you should change it? Maybe you shouldn’t 🤷‍♂️ A coach’s post coming from Austin Roark 🚀⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ One question I get from a lot of athletes is whether they should change their lower half because their knee is over their toe during their loading phase down the mound. ⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ The biggest thing that I look for when trying to figure out if it is an issue or not is to see how they are able to get out of that position. Some guys are able to leverage and rotate from that position extremely well, which then I would say that it’s not an issue.⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ On the other hand, there are some guys who will get out of this position by driving extension out of their back leg, killing their ability to rotate their pelvis and get it in an open position into landing.⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ This is when I would suggest trying to make a change. I think a lot of people jump into certain ideologies that you shouldn’t do certain things because it’s “inefficient” or it looks “wrong”. ⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ Take a look at these pitchers shown in the video. All 3 of these high level arms have some degree of knee flexion over their toe. Now, granted, they all have insane levers to help them, but the way they are moving is what makes them efficient in how they throw. ⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ I think if you told Dustin May that he had to hold a vertical shin down the mound, it would be a disaster and mess a lot of things up upstream that would impact him in a negative way.⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ The big takeaway here is that there are no absolutes. One thing that may look inefficient to you could be the thing that makes someone else very efficient.⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ When trying to figure out if you should change something about someone's delivery, make sure to look at the entire unit as a whole and don’t jump into any quick changes.
0:16

Wondering if you are “quad dominant” in your throw and if you should change it? Maybe you shouldn’t 🤷‍♂️ A coach’s post coming from Austin Roark 🚀⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ One question I get from a lot of athletes is whether they should change their lower half because their knee is over their toe during their loading phase down the mound. ⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ The biggest thing that I look for when trying to figure out if it is an issue or not is to see how they are able to get out of that position. Some guys are able to leverage and rotate from that position extremely well, which then I would say that it’s not an issue.⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ On the other hand, there are some guys who will get out of this position by driving extension out of their back leg, killing their ability to rotate their pelvis and get it in an open position into landing.⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ This is when I would suggest trying to make a change. I think a lot of people jump into certain ideologies that you shouldn’t do certain things because it’s “inefficient” or it looks “wrong”. ⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ Take a look at these pitchers shown in the video. All 3 of these high level arms have some degree of knee flexion over their toe. Now, granted, they all have insane levers to help them, but the way they are moving is what makes them efficient in how they throw. ⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ I think if you told Dustin May that he had to hold a vertical shin down the mound, it would be a disaster and mess a lot of things up upstream that would impact him in a negative way.⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ The big takeaway here is that there are no absolutes. One thing that may look inefficient to you could be the thing that makes someone else very efficient.⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ When trying to figure out if you should change something about someone's delivery, make sure to look at the entire unit as a whole and don’t jump into any quick changes.

Tread Athletics

25,070 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨 SCIENTISTS JUST BUILT AN ARTIFICIAL RETINA THAT RESTORES VISION AND ADDS INFRARED SIGHT. Researchers at Yonsei University in South Korea have developed a flexible, three-layer implant that bypasses dead photoreceptors and directly stimulates healthy retinal ganglion cells. The device not only helps restore vision in cases of retinal degeneration (like retinitis pigmentosa) but also gives the eye the ability to detect near-infrared light that humans normally cannot see. The key innovation is a soft 3D array of liquid metal micropillars (gallium-indium alloy) that gently conform to the curved retina without causing damage or inflammation a major improvement over rigid electrodes used in earlier implants. Why this matters: • Retinal diseases destroy light-sensing cells, but the neurons deeper in the eye often remain healthy and capable of sending signals to the brain • The implant uses an ultrathin filter + phototransistor array to convert near-infrared light into electrical signals the ganglion cells can understand • In mouse tests, blind animals regained visual responses, while healthy mice gained infrared sensitivity on top of their normal vision • The liquid metal electrodes are soft and biocompatible, dramatically reducing the risk of scarring or tissue damage The deeper implication: This isn’t just about restoring lost vision it’s about augmenting human sight. If it reaches human trials and proves safe long-term, people with partial vision loss could keep their remaining natural sight while gaining an entirely new sensory channel (infrared). The biggest open question is how the human brain would interpret this new stream of information whether it would feel like a new color, an overlay, or something else entirely. We’re moving from “fixing blindness” to “expanding what it means to see.” How do you think gaining the ability to see infrared light would change daily life or human perception? Follow for more frontier neurotechnology and bionic vision breakthroughs.
0:10

🚨 SCIENTISTS JUST BUILT AN ARTIFICIAL RETINA THAT RESTORES VISION AND ADDS INFRARED SIGHT. Researchers at Yonsei University in South Korea have developed a flexible, three-layer implant that bypasses dead photoreceptors and directly stimulates healthy retinal ganglion cells. The device not only helps restore vision in cases of retinal degeneration (like retinitis pigmentosa) but also gives the eye the ability to detect near-infrared light that humans normally cannot see. The key innovation is a soft 3D array of liquid metal micropillars (gallium-indium alloy) that gently conform to the curved retina without causing damage or inflammation a major improvement over rigid electrodes used in earlier implants. Why this matters: • Retinal diseases destroy light-sensing cells, but the neurons deeper in the eye often remain healthy and capable of sending signals to the brain • The implant uses an ultrathin filter + phototransistor array to convert near-infrared light into electrical signals the ganglion cells can understand • In mouse tests, blind animals regained visual responses, while healthy mice gained infrared sensitivity on top of their normal vision • The liquid metal electrodes are soft and biocompatible, dramatically reducing the risk of scarring or tissue damage The deeper implication: This isn’t just about restoring lost vision it’s about augmenting human sight. If it reaches human trials and proves safe long-term, people with partial vision loss could keep their remaining natural sight while gaining an entirely new sensory channel (infrared). The biggest open question is how the human brain would interpret this new stream of information whether it would feel like a new color, an overlay, or something else entirely. We’re moving from “fixing blindness” to “expanding what it means to see.” How do you think gaining the ability to see infrared light would change daily life or human perception? Follow for more frontier neurotechnology and bionic vision breakthroughs.

TheNewPhysics

34,362 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Look at the expression in this dog's eyes; it seems to convey deep emotion over an adoption he had stopped believing would happen—yet one he desperately needed, because the shelter was facing closure, either temporarily or for good (and the dog seemed to sense it).
0:15

Look at the expression in this dog's eyes; it seems to convey deep emotion over an adoption he had stopped believing would happen—yet one he desperately needed, because the shelter was facing closure, either temporarily or for good (and the dog seemed to sense it).

Gabriele Corno

17,555 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

They wrapped Jesus in a flag, painted Him white, and baptized their politics, but the Christ of the Bible never carried party loyalty, He carried a cross. The same voices shouting “Christian nation” built a version of Jesus that looks like them, votes like them, and blesses their power. But Scripture says every knee shall bow, not to a political idol, not to a party platform, but to the risen Christ. And when He comes back, He won’t be filtered through European art, American nationalism, or MAGA mythology. He’ll be who He’s always been, a brown-skinned Savior from the margins, the One they overlooked while claiming to represent Him. The shock won’t be that He came back. The shock will be that He never looked like what they worshipped.
0:18

They wrapped Jesus in a flag, painted Him white, and baptized their politics, but the Christ of the Bible never carried party loyalty, He carried a cross. The same voices shouting “Christian nation” built a version of Jesus that looks like them, votes like them, and blesses their power. But Scripture says every knee shall bow, not to a political idol, not to a party platform, but to the risen Christ. And when He comes back, He won’t be filtered through European art, American nationalism, or MAGA mythology. He’ll be who He’s always been, a brown-skinned Savior from the margins, the One they overlooked while claiming to represent Him. The shock won’t be that He came back. The shock will be that He never looked like what they worshipped.

Bishop Talbert Swan

31,945 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

UPDATE The man in the video has now come forward and provided the following video to explain what he brought into Mitch Sylvester's store. Information that I have received includes - He avoided calls from the RCMP for several weeks - He left the store with the item - He is claiming it was just a misunderstanding - The RCMP still has an open investigation - Charges could still be filed - There was one item, not two as previously reported If this was infact the item he brought into the store along with his "This is for Mitch" message, this is hands down the dumbest thing anyone can do to the employees of the store, and to Mitch directly. There still is an active investigation as showing staff a bullet, or a pen that looks like a bullet, uttering a threat, and not responding to the RCMP for weeks, is still grounds for criminal charges. Thank you to the dozens of people who did recognize the man, and provided tips.
0:19

UPDATE The man in the video has now come forward and provided the following video to explain what he brought into Mitch Sylvester's store. Information that I have received includes - He avoided calls from the RCMP for several weeks - He left the store with the item - He is claiming it was just a misunderstanding - The RCMP still has an open investigation - Charges could still be filed - There was one item, not two as previously reported If this was infact the item he brought into the store along with his "This is for Mitch" message, this is hands down the dumbest thing anyone can do to the employees of the store, and to Mitch directly. There still is an active investigation as showing staff a bullet, or a pen that looks like a bullet, uttering a threat, and not responding to the RCMP for weeks, is still grounds for criminal charges. Thank you to the dozens of people who did recognize the man, and provided tips.

Jason Lavigne

34,521 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Regarding the Eric Trump / Daniel Cormier “text scandal”, I am open to being convinced otherwise, but I do not believe for one second that Eric Trump would text something so stupid to Daniel Cormier. It’s laughably stupid on its face to think that Eric Trump would ask a UFC commentator if any of the fights are “rigged”. That he would ask it in writing. And that he would not, for example, just pick up the phone and call Dana White or Joe Rogan himself. That said, I just want to understand what happened. Daniel Cormier said he was hacked. Is that to say he was hacked at the text level, or the X post level? Did he in fact make the post, and delete it? If he made the post, did he do it as a joke to illustrate how absurd the text hack was, but realized how the post could be misinterpreted as real? Or did someone make the post from his X account he subsequently deleted it. I know there are some who are going to say he made the post in earnest, thinking the text messages were real, intending to call out the “corruption”, and he has since been threatened, deleted the post, and claimed “hack”, etc. I can tell you exactly why I do not believe, even if he made the post, he did it believing the text message was real, intending to call out the “corruption”. If Cormier seriously thought the text messages were real, he would understand that by posting it publicly, it would literally destroy the UFC, his livelihood and his legacy - in addition to the legacy of everyone who has ever competed in the UFC. There is no realm of the universe in which even if it were in fact a real text that he actually received from Eric Trump, he would post it publicly. Because it would mean the end of the UFC. I just want to know if he actually made the post from his X account, or if the entire post was the result of a hack (hence the subsequent deleting of the post). Serious and sincere questions for clarity that would benefit everyone Eric Trump
0:16

Regarding the Eric Trump / Daniel Cormier “text scandal”, I am open to being convinced otherwise, but I do not believe for one second that Eric Trump would text something so stupid to Daniel Cormier. It’s laughably stupid on its face to think that Eric Trump would ask a UFC commentator if any of the fights are “rigged”. That he would ask it in writing. And that he would not, for example, just pick up the phone and call Dana White or Joe Rogan himself. That said, I just want to understand what happened. Daniel Cormier said he was hacked. Is that to say he was hacked at the text level, or the X post level? Did he in fact make the post, and delete it? If he made the post, did he do it as a joke to illustrate how absurd the text hack was, but realized how the post could be misinterpreted as real? Or did someone make the post from his X account he subsequently deleted it. I know there are some who are going to say he made the post in earnest, thinking the text messages were real, intending to call out the “corruption”, and he has since been threatened, deleted the post, and claimed “hack”, etc. I can tell you exactly why I do not believe, even if he made the post, he did it believing the text message was real, intending to call out the “corruption”. If Cormier seriously thought the text messages were real, he would understand that by posting it publicly, it would literally destroy the UFC, his livelihood and his legacy - in addition to the legacy of everyone who has ever competed in the UFC. There is no realm of the universe in which even if it were in fact a real text that he actually received from Eric Trump, he would post it publicly. Because it would mean the end of the UFC. I just want to know if he actually made the post from his X account, or if the entire post was the result of a hack (hence the subsequent deleting of the post). Serious and sincere questions for clarity that would benefit everyone Eric Trump

Viva Frei

30,167 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Throwback to 2009. What was supposed to be an ordinary day of cricket turned into one of the darkest days in the history of the sport. The Sri Lankan team was on its way to the stadium in Lahore when their convoy came under a terrorist attack. Gunfire echoed through the streets, players were injured, brave security personnel lost their lives, and the match was abandoned. Hours later, military helicopters landed inside the stadium to evacuate the team safely—an image that would go on to become one of the most shocking scenes ever witnessed in cricket. The attack not only stunned the cricketing world but also changed the future of the game. International teams stopped touring Pakistan for years, security protocols across world cricket were tightened, and the incident became a reminder that some moments are far bigger than runs, wickets, records, or trophies. A day cricket will never forget.
0:17

Throwback to 2009. What was supposed to be an ordinary day of cricket turned into one of the darkest days in the history of the sport. The Sri Lankan team was on its way to the stadium in Lahore when their convoy came under a terrorist attack. Gunfire echoed through the streets, players were injured, brave security personnel lost their lives, and the match was abandoned. Hours later, military helicopters landed inside the stadium to evacuate the team safely—an image that would go on to become one of the most shocking scenes ever witnessed in cricket. The attack not only stunned the cricketing world but also changed the future of the game. International teams stopped touring Pakistan for years, security protocols across world cricket were tightened, and the incident became a reminder that some moments are far bigger than runs, wickets, records, or trophies. A day cricket will never forget.

Drashti CSKian 💛

297,014 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Mick Jagger: Fans Don’t Want Political Lectures at Concerts Rolling Stones frontman Mick Jagger pushed back against the trend of musicians delivering political speeches from the stage, following Bruce Springsteen’s recent anti-Trump remarks. Speaking in a Saturday interview on The New York Times’ podcast, Jagger said fans come to shows for an escape: “The bottom line of my thing really is that my job in the live music world is for those people that come is to have the best time they possibly can. For two hours or whatever it is, to forget all their problems and the problems of the world… You don’t want to lecture them.” He added that “Nobody wants to hear a whole song about politics.” (Video: AI) Do you agree with Jagger that concerts should be an escape from politics? Or do you think artists should use their platform to speak out?
0:15

Mick Jagger: Fans Don’t Want Political Lectures at Concerts Rolling Stones frontman Mick Jagger pushed back against the trend of musicians delivering political speeches from the stage, following Bruce Springsteen’s recent anti-Trump remarks. Speaking in a Saturday interview on The New York Times’ podcast, Jagger said fans come to shows for an escape: “The bottom line of my thing really is that my job in the live music world is for those people that come is to have the best time they possibly can. For two hours or whatever it is, to forget all their problems and the problems of the world… You don’t want to lecture them.” He added that “Nobody wants to hear a whole song about politics.” (Video: AI) Do you agree with Jagger that concerts should be an escape from politics? Or do you think artists should use their platform to speak out?

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

274,799 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

We live in a transactional culture where people treat human boundaries and lifelong loyalty as variables they can manipulate or delete the moment a new phase of life fits their personal aesthetic. Look at this image. Mabel is a 12-year-old Golden Retriever with a muzzle completely turned white by time. Three weeks before the wedding, the fiancé delivered an ultimatum: the old dog could not move into their new house. He didn't just suggest it; he had secretly pre-arranged to discard her, waiting until the marriage was close because he calculated that the woman would feel too trapped to resist. He claimed she was "choosing a dog over their future." He entirely failed to comprehend that she wasn't choosing a dog—she was rejecting a sociopathic blueprint of manipulation. She took off her ring on the spot, canceled the venue, and went to bury her face in the fur of the only creature in that equation who actually understood the sacred geometry of a lifelong promise. True emotional evolution isn't found in a flawless wedding script; it’s found in the raw reflex to protect the vulnerable from calculated betrayal. Who is truly wealthy here? 👇
0:15

We live in a transactional culture where people treat human boundaries and lifelong loyalty as variables they can manipulate or delete the moment a new phase of life fits their personal aesthetic. Look at this image. Mabel is a 12-year-old Golden Retriever with a muzzle completely turned white by time. Three weeks before the wedding, the fiancé delivered an ultimatum: the old dog could not move into their new house. He didn't just suggest it; he had secretly pre-arranged to discard her, waiting until the marriage was close because he calculated that the woman would feel too trapped to resist. He claimed she was "choosing a dog over their future." He entirely failed to comprehend that she wasn't choosing a dog—she was rejecting a sociopathic blueprint of manipulation. She took off her ring on the spot, canceled the venue, and went to bury her face in the fur of the only creature in that equation who actually understood the sacred geometry of a lifelong promise. True emotional evolution isn't found in a flawless wedding script; it’s found in the raw reflex to protect the vulnerable from calculated betrayal. Who is truly wealthy here? 👇

Gabriele Corno

14,747 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

🇺🇸‼️🚨 IMPORTANT: The ICE agent clearly was not scared or overly stressed … after shooting the woman he said “FUCKING BITCH”. He seems fine. I have to add, that the women were out of their minds too. They provoked ICE, but seemed to wanted to drive away … anyway. So, radical liberals met an ICE agent who has no temper after he was dragged by an illegal the last time. -> The question is not if she hit him, or how much. That was always visible. The question is, was he in danger when he fired? And he fired after jumping out of the way.
0:16

🇺🇸‼️🚨 IMPORTANT: The ICE agent clearly was not scared or overly stressed … after shooting the woman he said “FUCKING BITCH”. He seems fine. I have to add, that the women were out of their minds too. They provoked ICE, but seemed to wanted to drive away … anyway. So, radical liberals met an ICE agent who has no temper after he was dragged by an illegal the last time. -> The question is not if she hit him, or how much. That was always visible. The question is, was he in danger when he fired? And he fired after jumping out of the way.

Lord Bebo

64,826 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce