Bad Momma Bear....

she has a cam next to her bed? 🤔

well, sure, some folks do........

yeah for onlyfans.

My kinda women. I hope she shot them dead. I know my wife would have.

Y los boludos creen que estos videos son reales!! Quien tiene una cámara dentro de la habitación?? Se graban cogiendo?

The Closest to Compton, you'll get. Boom, bang, bang,

Fake

Look it up dumbass.....

OUTSTANDING!!

She wasn't playing....

Nope, and good for her! 😁👍

pew pew pew pew......

Absolutely!!

😲

She wasn't playing....

No, she wasn't

The core claim does not hold up under the data. The idea that electing candidates focused on the standard gun-control package (universal background checks, assault-weapon/magazine bans, red-flag expansions, etc.) creates a clear path to a “safer country” via “evidence-based” strategies is overstated. Recent trends and systematic reviews show limited causal support for the biggest restrictions, while major declines in gun homicide have occurred amid expanding legal ownership and carry rights.What the numbers actually show Gun homicides and overall murders have fallen sharply. CDC data: gun homicides dropped from a 2021 peak near 21,000 to about 15,364 in 2024 and roughly 12,850 in 2025. Overall gun deaths also declined (driven almost entirely by the homicide drop), reaching multi-year lows. FBI figures show the 2025 murder rate at 4.1 per 100,000—tied with the lowest since the mid-1950s—with an 18.1% year-over-year drop in murders and large declines in violent crime. From 2022–2025, estimated murders fell about 36%. These declines continued through the post-Bruen period of expanded carry rights and permitless carry in many states. Most gun deaths are suicides, not “gun violence” in the street-crime sense. In recent years suicides have accounted for ~58–66% of firearm deaths (record highs in absolute numbers), while homicides have been the declining share. Policy focused narrowly on restricting ownership of law-abiding citizens has limited leverage on the dominant category. “Assault weapons” and rifles are a small slice of the problem. FBI data analyses show rifles (the category that includes AR-15-pattern guns) typically account for ~3–5% of firearm murders. Their share of firearm murders was not higher during the 1994–2004 federal ban and fell afterward (to ~3.6%) even as estimated civilian ownership of AR/AK-pattern rifles rose roughly tenfold. Handguns dominate firearm crime. What the research actually findsRAND’s systematic reviews of gun-policy evidence (updated through 2026) rate most high-profile interventions as having limited, moderate, or inconclusive evidence for reducing homicide or overall gun deaths. Stronger findings exist for narrower measures such as child-access prevention/safe-storage laws (reducing youth firearm suicide, accidental injury, and some youth homicide) and certain minimum-age rules. Dealer background checks and some universal-check or permit-to-purchase requirements show moderate evidence of modest homicide reductions. Evidence for broad assault-weapon bans or magazine limits on mass shootings or overall homicide is weaker or inconclusive. Some permissive carry and stand-your-ground laws show associations with modest increases in homicide.State-level correlations (strict-law/low-ownership states often have lower overall gun-death rates, driven heavily by suicide) are real but do not isolate causation. High-homicide cities with tight local laws, illegal-gun flows, gang activity, and enforcement problems remain outliers. Demographic, cultural, economic, and policing factors dominate interpersonal violence far more than the marginal difference between “shall-issue” and stricter regimes. Predictions of a post-Bruen or post-permitless-carry “bloodbath” have not matched the subsequent multi-year declines.The practical gapCriminals and high-risk individuals (prior offenders, those with domestic-violence histories, etc.) already face federal and state prohibitions; compliance and enforcement gaps, not the absence of one more ban on legal owners, are the operational problem. Focused deterrence, targeted enforcement against known high-risk networks, and mental-health interventions have stronger practical track records in reducing shootings in specific cities than broad ownership restrictions. The 2026 midterms saw heavy spending by gun-control groups and Democratic gains, but polling showed guns ranked low among voter priorities compared with crime or the short: recent safety gains occurred without the package these groups treat as self-evidently effective. The strongest evidence supports narrower, targeted measures (storage, certain prohibitions on high-risk people, background-check improvements) far more than sweeping bans on commonly owned firearms. Treating the latter as the clear evidence-based path to a safer country overstates what the data show.

Uy, con los amigos del marido y en tanga 😂😂

Así le gusta andar andar vestida

I hope she’s in GTA 6😫

Okay, yep badass dog breed. My question 🙋... was she sitting ard, in the thong wear watching ballgame, w / hubby & HIS ? Friends.??? I'm almost positive, that's the happening spot, for game night. 😊😳🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️🥁

It's their instinct to protect!

I am so tired of Posts like this.

E ela obviamente ganhou o tiroteio com o filho e o marido de refem??

Ricota las nalgas

Que miedo da estado unidos pura gente loca 🥺 como van a entrar a su casa de esa forma

Real Lucia

F all you Mexicans

We have our cam in the bedroom - that way at night we see intruders you dumbass

🧐🧐Then there are two shots, and the pistol runs out of ammo.