正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

BADBITCH3SONTOUR.mp3

10,983 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

have yall seen pooptime in arabic
0:35

Sensitive content

have yall seen pooptime in arabic

jery

34,816 次观看 • 1 天前

Kid owns 2 cops with his understanding of the law and the rights of his middle finger. ​The situation began when an officer with the Little Egg Harbor Police Department pulled over after witnessing a pedestrian walking down the shoulder of the road. According to the officer, the individual flipped him the finger twice as his cruiser drove past. Refusing to ignore the gesture, the officer confronted the pedestrian, demanding to know what their problem was. ​What started as a verbal disagreement quickly spiraled. The pedestrian immediately asserted their right to walk away, repeatedly asking, "Am I free to go?" ​He claimed the pedestrian was being legally detained for "acting strange" and "causing a public disturbance." When the pedestrian tried to continue walking, the officer physically grabbed their arm, leading to a tense struggle where the pedestrian began shouting for help. A second officer arrived shortly after to act as a cover unit. ​Throughout the interaction, the pedestrian fiercely protected his rights, arguing that cursing and flipping off a police officer are entirely protected under the First Amendment—and legally, he is correct. ​The backup officer attempted to play mediator, explaining that while the pedestrian wasn't being charged with a crime, the primary officer had the right to detain them to investigate "behavior that's out of the ordinary" and ensure public safety. ​After a lengthy back-and-forth about the Fourth Amendment and what constitutes an unlawful order, the pedestrian handed over their ID (which I think he should not have) to clear the investigation. The officers returned it, giving a warning to stay out of the roadway, and the pedestrian walked away—but not before taking down badge numbers and promising a lawsuit. ​Federal courts have consistently ruled that expressing vulgar gestures or language toward police officers, while disrespectful, is protected speech under the First Amendment. It does not, on its own, constitute reasonable articulable suspicion that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed. Also check out our new triva below. I look forward to reading your answers to the trivia question.

Giggling Ganon

57,763 次观看 • 1 天前