Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

14,426 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

54 Kommentare

Profilbild von Marik vR
Marik vRvor 1 Monat

This looks like video game footage, @MickWest. Is it? And if so, this is *highly* disingenuous. A latex balloon is generally translucent (or has a low-fidelity signature in infrared), while a Mylar balloon - unlike in this video - would be “cold” on top. Credit to Dave Falch:

Profilbild von Mick West
Mick Westvor 1 Monat

Video game? Not exactly. It's a simulation of the MOTION, not the exact optical properties of the scene. You can see the background is just greyscale Google 3D buildings. But I'll get to optical properties eventually. No rush, it's been like 83 years.

Profilbild von Marik vR
Marik vRvor 1 Monat

Indeed. There is clearly no rush. It’s been almost a year since @ZaineMichael1 and Yannick began falsifying your “Gimbal” “explanations” on Metabunk, and five months since the analysis below was posted publicly. It’s “no rush” because you refuse to admit you were wrong.

Profilbild von Mick West
Mick Westvor 1 Monat

@ZaineMichael1 As I said, I'm waiting for you to actually convince someone who can defend it. How is that going? Don't you know any scientists who want to change the world?

Profilbild von Marik vR
Marik vRvor 1 Monat

@ZaineMichael1 Nobody “of significance” defended your “Gimbal” “explanations,” @MickWest. (In fact, some of the world’s top experts *explicitly disagreed.*) Why is that the standard? Isn’t independent analysis and replication the standard? (You yourself replicated the downward camera tilt!)

Profilbild von Mick West
Mick Westvor 1 Monat

@ZaineMichael1 I'm not constantly demanding you look at my work. You do that yourself.

Profilbild von Marik vR
Marik vRvor 1 Monat

@ZaineMichael1 Previously, you relentlessly defended your work (and condescendingly belittled those who disagreed or inadvertently misunderstood your convoluted “theories”). But, now, after those “theories” were conclusively falsified, you refuse to engage with the data and evidence.

Profilbild von Mick West
Mick Westvor 1 Monat

@ZaineMichael1 Because disagree with your interpretation.

Profilbild von ₮ⓇȺហ₴ⱮටⓇͲȺꝈ
₮ⓇȺហ₴ⱮටⓇͲȺꝈvor 1 Monat

Mick West isn't a UFO or UAP debunker. He is a balloon, bird and plane finder. There's a huge difference. If it's a UFO, it's ignored. If it's a balloon, he will tell everyone it's a balloon.

Profilbild von Kelly Goodman PhD
Kelly Goodman PhDvor 1 Monat

So your theory is that Air Force pilots - who are highly trained in observation - don't know what a balloon in flight looks like? That's your theory?

Profilbild von Mick West
Mick Westvor 1 Monat

Occasionally.

Profilbild von Dave Beaty 🇺🇦
Dave Beaty 🇺🇦vor 1 Monat

@mrjeffknox It’s amazing how it creates the illusion of speed

Profilbild von ₮ⓇȺហ₴ⱮටⓇͲȺꝈ
₮ⓇȺហ₴ⱮටⓇͲȺꝈvor 1 Monat

This is Mick's work process. Go through hundreds and hundreds of UFO videos, find the one that looks like a balloon or parallax, and then use that as some kind of debunk and pat himself on the back. Fucking well done, mate. You've found another balloon video.

Profilbild von Dave Christian
Dave Christianvor 1 Monat

Balloon Mick? I find that hard to believe, this white orb has a consistent fuzzy edge, zoomed in or not, it's visible, which means you're balloon theory is questionable.

Profilbild von herald of the summer storms
herald of the summer stormsvor 1 Monat

Nice. Can you do "instant acceleration"?

Profilbild von Mick West
Mick Westvor 1 Monat

Yes.

Profilbild von Steve Spooner
Steve Spoonervor 1 Monat

So basically no evidence, a group of ufology pals hyping balloons etc and the people recording them and government releasing them are a bit thick 🤣

Profilbild von mike whelan
mike whelanvor 1 Monat

But what credible person is actually saying anything to the contrary? Now dissect the Tic-Tac incident with David Fravor & Aelx Deitrich and include all of the eyewitness testimonies, sensor data on ships and in the fighter aircraft & AWACS.

Profilbild von UFOHeatSeeker
UFOHeatSeekervor 1 Monat

How do you explain all this then?

Profilbild von Mick West
Mick Westvor 1 Monat

First one is a mylar balloon. Second one appears to be an insect.

Profilbild von UFOHeatSeeker
UFOHeatSeekervor 1 Monat

An Insect a round reflective insect with no wings... Totally explained now

Profilbild von matt hiebert
matt hiebertvor 1 Monat

Helium powered orb

Profilbild von Steven
Stevenvor 1 Monat

That's nice. How about post an actual UAP and debunk that. Every single time its mistaken? People are confused? Everytime? I mean, that make trained observers pretty stupid. Unreliable. Military equipment we use to protect ourselves worthless. Or maybe, some UAPs are legit.

Profilbild von SkyFisher47
SkyFisher47vor 1 Monat

I’d like to know how you have surmised such? Methodologies please? IMO that’s a sphere…not a balloon. The ground is a shit ton clearer than the object that’s closer to the camera…so are you also saying this is out of focus as well? I’ve filmed balloons,& there’s a major difference. On a balloon, there are defined edges. On a Sphere/orb, due to the amount of flat out energy they give off as they spin (which you can commonly observe w/magnification in slow motion,as there are “vents” or some form of markings in many I’ve filmed,& such displays the insane rotation speeds,as well the Govt releases in IR which almost completely confirm this observation). Spheres always disturb the atmosphere all around them so much, that often times like flat out static (not always). If you would like, I can provide you with examples? The only way WE ALL will understand these things better is via open discussion. Otherwise, we’re all just pulling each others dicks. Not trying to sound offensive, but that’s how toxic the UAP community has become these days. Everyone’s an expert, because “Trust me Bro…I know”. We can do better!

Profilbild von Twiitterviewer
Twiitterviewervor 1 Monat

clearly a miniture drone from the planet flibber .

Profilbild von newage alternative
newage alternativevor 1 Monat

Does balloon goes this speed ????

Profilbild von mike whelan
mike whelanvor 1 Monat

Tell us why the IC wanted emminent domain removed from Schumer's disclosure bill. Stuff like that... the harder stuff. Tell us why so many intelligence professionals are testifying to congress, and behind closed doors to the ICIG about the legacy program.

Profilbild von Zeek
Zeekvor 1 Monat

Why not try to debunk The Sphere Network. By @PatrickQJackson. Oh, thats right you can't.

Profilbild von Thomas
Thomasvor 1 Monat

I really hope that any alien race we encounter will be called Parallax, just for the fun of it 😂

Profilbild von Grievous Queef
Grievous Queefvor 1 Monat

how about getting the entire vid so we all can agree. anyone here seen it? anyone???

Profilbild von JR
JRvor 1 Monat

That balloon must have aliens in it

Profilbild von Hoax Buster
Hoax Bustervor 1 Monat

Simulated?

Profilbild von Mick West
Mick Westvor 1 Monat

Yes

Profilbild von Cryptard
Cryptardvor 1 Monat

“tHe oRb dEfiEd tHe LaWs of pHysiCs!”

Profilbild von Regular Dick
Regular Dickvor 1 Monat

☀️🎈🌎 (Not to Scale)

Profilbild von PNW_Wapiti
PNW_Wapitivor 1 Monat

Why pick the easy ones? Oh, never mind, I know why.

Profilbild von James Pierce
James Piercevor 1 Monat

UFOligy is dead. Stop kicking it.

Profilbild von Mick West
Mick Westvor 1 Monat

UFOs are going to continue to be seen and misidentified. This type of thing (WIP) helps people understand what they are looking at in the PERSUE videos.

Profilbild von James Pierce
James Piercevor 1 Monat

So you're saying there's a chance? :]

Profilbild von Mick West
Mick Westvor 1 Monat

Several!

Profilbild von PsiloCyan95
PsiloCyan95vor 1 Monat

Is it possible to find out how fast the camera is moving? If so, could you then sort of ballpark how slow/fast the balloon would have to move to look that way in that specific geographic area?

Profilbild von SpaceBob
SpaceBobvor 1 Monat

Show me the ballon and parallax as a comparison

Profilbild von Nippon Steel
Nippon Steelvor 1 Monat

Mick West is hallucinating again. That object is obviously moving in a straight trajectory. He's trying to say this is the parallax effect. Bwhahaha. Try again.

Profilbild von Trevor MacKenzie
Trevor MacKenzievor 1 Monat

Pshhh I ain’t never seen a balloon paralaxing from my point of view!

Profilbild von Mick West
Mick Westvor 1 Monat

If you were moving when you saw a balloon, then you have.

Profilbild von Dave Christian
Dave Christianvor 1 Monat

@TrevorMacK51061 Isn't it amazing how the USAF spends all it's time chasing down balloons, in fact, there must be so many balloons they just can't avoid them. Why, the USAF must be absolutely exhausted, and all that money wasted...phew!

Profilbild von Mick West
Mick Westvor 1 Monat

@TrevorMacK51061 Yes, it’s a problem.

Profilbild von Dave Christian
Dave Christianvor 1 Monat

@TrevorMacK51061 Dear Mick, you put a lot of trust in AARO. It's almost... suspicious. I'm going to dismiss that chart, because it doesn't include UAP. Plus AARO isn't really transparent about things.

Profilbild von Mick West
Mick Westvor 1 Monat

@TrevorMacK51061 Those are resolved cases that were initially reported as UAP.

Profilbild von babyUFO
babyUFOvor 1 Monat

@grok what is the ground speed of the object?

Profilbild von homme2lombre
homme2lombrevor 1 Monat

Your job sucks really, you keep seing ballons seaguls and insects everyday, everywhere 😂

Profilbild von Flup
Flupvor 1 Monat

but ... but ... it's an orb

Profilbild von DJR
DJRvor 1 Monat

New tranche being released this week or so I've heard.

Profilbild von Fate
Fatevor 1 Monat

You mean ALIEN Balloon + Parallax 👽

Ähnliche Videos