Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Balloon + Parallax

14,426 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 54

Фото профиля Marik vR
Marik vR1 месяц назад

This looks like video game footage, @MickWest. Is it? And if so, this is *highly* disingenuous. A latex balloon is generally translucent (or has a low-fidelity signature in infrared), while a Mylar balloon - unlike in this video - would be “cold” on top. Credit to Dave Falch:

Фото профиля Mick West
Mick West1 месяц назад

Video game? Not exactly. It's a simulation of the MOTION, not the exact optical properties of the scene. You can see the background is just greyscale Google 3D buildings. But I'll get to optical properties eventually. No rush, it's been like 83 years.

Фото профиля Marik vR
Marik vR1 месяц назад

Indeed. There is clearly no rush. It’s been almost a year since @ZaineMichael1 and Yannick began falsifying your “Gimbal” “explanations” on Metabunk, and five months since the analysis below was posted publicly. It’s “no rush” because you refuse to admit you were wrong.

Фото профиля Mick West
Mick West1 месяц назад

@ZaineMichael1 As I said, I'm waiting for you to actually convince someone who can defend it. How is that going? Don't you know any scientists who want to change the world?

Фото профиля Marik vR
Marik vR1 месяц назад

@ZaineMichael1 Nobody “of significance” defended your “Gimbal” “explanations,” @MickWest. (In fact, some of the world’s top experts *explicitly disagreed.*) Why is that the standard? Isn’t independent analysis and replication the standard? (You yourself replicated the downward camera tilt!)

Фото профиля Mick West
Mick West1 месяц назад

@ZaineMichael1 I'm not constantly demanding you look at my work. You do that yourself.

Фото профиля Marik vR
Marik vR1 месяц назад

@ZaineMichael1 Previously, you relentlessly defended your work (and condescendingly belittled those who disagreed or inadvertently misunderstood your convoluted “theories”). But, now, after those “theories” were conclusively falsified, you refuse to engage with the data and evidence.

Фото профиля Mick West
Mick West1 месяц назад

@ZaineMichael1 Because disagree with your interpretation.

Фото профиля ₮ⓇȺហ₴ⱮටⓇͲȺꝈ
₮ⓇȺហ₴ⱮටⓇͲȺꝈ1 месяц назад

Mick West isn't a UFO or UAP debunker. He is a balloon, bird and plane finder. There's a huge difference. If it's a UFO, it's ignored. If it's a balloon, he will tell everyone it's a balloon.

Фото профиля Kelly Goodman PhD
Kelly Goodman PhD1 месяц назад

So your theory is that Air Force pilots - who are highly trained in observation - don't know what a balloon in flight looks like? That's your theory?

Фото профиля Mick West
Mick West1 месяц назад

Occasionally.

Фото профиля Dave Beaty 🇺🇦
Dave Beaty 🇺🇦1 месяц назад

@mrjeffknox It’s amazing how it creates the illusion of speed

Фото профиля ₮ⓇȺហ₴ⱮටⓇͲȺꝈ
₮ⓇȺហ₴ⱮටⓇͲȺꝈ1 месяц назад

This is Mick's work process. Go through hundreds and hundreds of UFO videos, find the one that looks like a balloon or parallax, and then use that as some kind of debunk and pat himself on the back. Fucking well done, mate. You've found another balloon video.

Фото профиля Dave Christian
Dave Christian1 месяц назад

Balloon Mick? I find that hard to believe, this white orb has a consistent fuzzy edge, zoomed in or not, it's visible, which means you're balloon theory is questionable.

Фото профиля herald of the summer storms
herald of the summer storms1 месяц назад

Nice. Can you do "instant acceleration"?

Фото профиля Mick West
Mick West1 месяц назад

Yes.

Фото профиля Steve Spooner
Steve Spooner1 месяц назад

So basically no evidence, a group of ufology pals hyping balloons etc and the people recording them and government releasing them are a bit thick 🤣

Фото профиля mike whelan
mike whelan1 месяц назад

But what credible person is actually saying anything to the contrary? Now dissect the Tic-Tac incident with David Fravor & Aelx Deitrich and include all of the eyewitness testimonies, sensor data on ships and in the fighter aircraft & AWACS.

Фото профиля UFOHeatSeeker
UFOHeatSeeker1 месяц назад

How do you explain all this then?

Фото профиля Mick West
Mick West1 месяц назад

First one is a mylar balloon. Second one appears to be an insect.

Фото профиля UFOHeatSeeker
UFOHeatSeeker1 месяц назад

An Insect a round reflective insect with no wings... Totally explained now

Фото профиля matt hiebert
matt hiebert1 месяц назад

Helium powered orb

Фото профиля Steven
Steven1 месяц назад

That's nice. How about post an actual UAP and debunk that. Every single time its mistaken? People are confused? Everytime? I mean, that make trained observers pretty stupid. Unreliable. Military equipment we use to protect ourselves worthless. Or maybe, some UAPs are legit.

Фото профиля SkyFisher47
SkyFisher471 месяц назад

I’d like to know how you have surmised such? Methodologies please? IMO that’s a sphere…not a balloon. The ground is a shit ton clearer than the object that’s closer to the camera…so are you also saying this is out of focus as well? I’ve filmed balloons,& there’s a major difference. On a balloon, there are defined edges. On a Sphere/orb, due to the amount of flat out energy they give off as they spin (which you can commonly observe w/magnification in slow motion,as there are “vents” or some form of markings in many I’ve filmed,& such displays the insane rotation speeds,as well the Govt releases in IR which almost completely confirm this observation). Spheres always disturb the atmosphere all around them so much, that often times like flat out static (not always). If you would like, I can provide you with examples? The only way WE ALL will understand these things better is via open discussion. Otherwise, we’re all just pulling each others dicks. Not trying to sound offensive, but that’s how toxic the UAP community has become these days. Everyone’s an expert, because “Trust me Bro…I know”. We can do better!

Фото профиля Twiitterviewer
Twiitterviewer1 месяц назад

clearly a miniture drone from the planet flibber .

Фото профиля newage alternative
newage alternative1 месяц назад

Does balloon goes this speed ????

Фото профиля mike whelan
mike whelan1 месяц назад

Tell us why the IC wanted emminent domain removed from Schumer's disclosure bill. Stuff like that... the harder stuff. Tell us why so many intelligence professionals are testifying to congress, and behind closed doors to the ICIG about the legacy program.

Фото профиля Zeek
Zeek1 месяц назад

Why not try to debunk The Sphere Network. By @PatrickQJackson. Oh, thats right you can't.

Фото профиля Thomas
Thomas1 месяц назад

I really hope that any alien race we encounter will be called Parallax, just for the fun of it 😂

Фото профиля Grievous Queef
Grievous Queef1 месяц назад

how about getting the entire vid so we all can agree. anyone here seen it? anyone???

Фото профиля JR
JR1 месяц назад

That balloon must have aliens in it

Фото профиля Hoax Buster
Hoax Buster1 месяц назад

Simulated?

Фото профиля Mick West
Mick West1 месяц назад

Yes

Фото профиля Cryptard
Cryptard1 месяц назад

“tHe oRb dEfiEd tHe LaWs of pHysiCs!”

Фото профиля Regular Dick
Regular Dick1 месяц назад

☀️🎈🌎 (Not to Scale)

Фото профиля PNW_Wapiti
PNW_Wapiti1 месяц назад

Why pick the easy ones? Oh, never mind, I know why.

Фото профиля James Pierce
James Pierce1 месяц назад

UFOligy is dead. Stop kicking it.

Фото профиля Mick West
Mick West1 месяц назад

UFOs are going to continue to be seen and misidentified. This type of thing (WIP) helps people understand what they are looking at in the PERSUE videos.

Фото профиля James Pierce
James Pierce1 месяц назад

So you're saying there's a chance? :]

Фото профиля Mick West
Mick West1 месяц назад

Several!

Фото профиля PsiloCyan95
PsiloCyan951 месяц назад

Is it possible to find out how fast the camera is moving? If so, could you then sort of ballpark how slow/fast the balloon would have to move to look that way in that specific geographic area?

Фото профиля SpaceBob
SpaceBob1 месяц назад

Show me the ballon and parallax as a comparison

Фото профиля Nippon Steel
Nippon Steel1 месяц назад

Mick West is hallucinating again. That object is obviously moving in a straight trajectory. He's trying to say this is the parallax effect. Bwhahaha. Try again.

Фото профиля Trevor MacKenzie
Trevor MacKenzie1 месяц назад

Pshhh I ain’t never seen a balloon paralaxing from my point of view!

Фото профиля Mick West
Mick West1 месяц назад

If you were moving when you saw a balloon, then you have.

Фото профиля Dave Christian
Dave Christian1 месяц назад

@TrevorMacK51061 Isn't it amazing how the USAF spends all it's time chasing down balloons, in fact, there must be so many balloons they just can't avoid them. Why, the USAF must be absolutely exhausted, and all that money wasted...phew!

Фото профиля Mick West
Mick West1 месяц назад

@TrevorMacK51061 Yes, it’s a problem.

Фото профиля Dave Christian
Dave Christian1 месяц назад

@TrevorMacK51061 Dear Mick, you put a lot of trust in AARO. It's almost... suspicious. I'm going to dismiss that chart, because it doesn't include UAP. Plus AARO isn't really transparent about things.

Фото профиля Mick West
Mick West1 месяц назад

@TrevorMacK51061 Those are resolved cases that were initially reported as UAP.

Фото профиля babyUFO
babyUFO1 месяц назад

@grok what is the ground speed of the object?

Фото профиля homme2lombre
homme2lombre1 месяц назад

Your job sucks really, you keep seing ballons seaguls and insects everyday, everywhere 😂

Фото профиля Flup
Flup1 месяц назад

but ... but ... it's an orb

Фото профиля DJR
DJR1 месяц назад

New tranche being released this week or so I've heard.

Фото профиля Fate
Fate1 месяц назад

You mean ALIEN Balloon + Parallax 👽

Похожие видео