Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Balloon + Parallax

14,426 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

54 Yorum

Marik vR profil fotoğrafı
Marik vR1 ay önce

This looks like video game footage, @MickWest. Is it? And if so, this is *highly* disingenuous. A latex balloon is generally translucent (or has a low-fidelity signature in infrared), while a Mylar balloon - unlike in this video - would be “cold” on top. Credit to Dave Falch:

Mick West profil fotoğrafı
Mick West1 ay önce

Video game? Not exactly. It's a simulation of the MOTION, not the exact optical properties of the scene. You can see the background is just greyscale Google 3D buildings. But I'll get to optical properties eventually. No rush, it's been like 83 years.

Marik vR profil fotoğrafı
Marik vR1 ay önce

Indeed. There is clearly no rush. It’s been almost a year since @ZaineMichael1 and Yannick began falsifying your “Gimbal” “explanations” on Metabunk, and five months since the analysis below was posted publicly. It’s “no rush” because you refuse to admit you were wrong.

Mick West profil fotoğrafı
Mick West1 ay önce

@ZaineMichael1 As I said, I'm waiting for you to actually convince someone who can defend it. How is that going? Don't you know any scientists who want to change the world?

Marik vR profil fotoğrafı
Marik vR1 ay önce

@ZaineMichael1 Nobody “of significance” defended your “Gimbal” “explanations,” @MickWest. (In fact, some of the world’s top experts *explicitly disagreed.*) Why is that the standard? Isn’t independent analysis and replication the standard? (You yourself replicated the downward camera tilt!)

Mick West profil fotoğrafı
Mick West1 ay önce

@ZaineMichael1 I'm not constantly demanding you look at my work. You do that yourself.

Marik vR profil fotoğrafı
Marik vR1 ay önce

@ZaineMichael1 Previously, you relentlessly defended your work (and condescendingly belittled those who disagreed or inadvertently misunderstood your convoluted “theories”). But, now, after those “theories” were conclusively falsified, you refuse to engage with the data and evidence.

Mick West profil fotoğrafı
Mick West1 ay önce

@ZaineMichael1 Because disagree with your interpretation.

₮ⓇȺហ₴ⱮටⓇͲȺꝈ profil fotoğrafı
₮ⓇȺហ₴ⱮටⓇͲȺꝈ1 ay önce

Mick West isn't a UFO or UAP debunker. He is a balloon, bird and plane finder. There's a huge difference. If it's a UFO, it's ignored. If it's a balloon, he will tell everyone it's a balloon.

Kelly Goodman PhD profil fotoğrafı
Kelly Goodman PhD1 ay önce

So your theory is that Air Force pilots - who are highly trained in observation - don't know what a balloon in flight looks like? That's your theory?

Mick West profil fotoğrafı
Mick West1 ay önce

Occasionally.

Dave Beaty 🇺🇦 profil fotoğrafı
Dave Beaty 🇺🇦1 ay önce

@mrjeffknox It’s amazing how it creates the illusion of speed

₮ⓇȺហ₴ⱮටⓇͲȺꝈ profil fotoğrafı
₮ⓇȺហ₴ⱮටⓇͲȺꝈ1 ay önce

This is Mick's work process. Go through hundreds and hundreds of UFO videos, find the one that looks like a balloon or parallax, and then use that as some kind of debunk and pat himself on the back. Fucking well done, mate. You've found another balloon video.

Dave Christian profil fotoğrafı
Dave Christian1 ay önce

Balloon Mick? I find that hard to believe, this white orb has a consistent fuzzy edge, zoomed in or not, it's visible, which means you're balloon theory is questionable.

herald of the summer storms profil fotoğrafı
herald of the summer storms1 ay önce

Nice. Can you do "instant acceleration"?

Mick West profil fotoğrafı
Mick West1 ay önce

Yes.

Steve Spooner profil fotoğrafı
Steve Spooner1 ay önce

So basically no evidence, a group of ufology pals hyping balloons etc and the people recording them and government releasing them are a bit thick 🤣

mike whelan profil fotoğrafı
mike whelan1 ay önce

But what credible person is actually saying anything to the contrary? Now dissect the Tic-Tac incident with David Fravor & Aelx Deitrich and include all of the eyewitness testimonies, sensor data on ships and in the fighter aircraft & AWACS.

UFOHeatSeeker profil fotoğrafı
UFOHeatSeeker1 ay önce

How do you explain all this then?

Mick West profil fotoğrafı
Mick West1 ay önce

First one is a mylar balloon. Second one appears to be an insect.

UFOHeatSeeker profil fotoğrafı
UFOHeatSeeker1 ay önce

An Insect a round reflective insect with no wings... Totally explained now

matt hiebert profil fotoğrafı
matt hiebert1 ay önce

Helium powered orb

Steven profil fotoğrafı
Steven1 ay önce

That's nice. How about post an actual UAP and debunk that. Every single time its mistaken? People are confused? Everytime? I mean, that make trained observers pretty stupid. Unreliable. Military equipment we use to protect ourselves worthless. Or maybe, some UAPs are legit.

SkyFisher47 profil fotoğrafı
SkyFisher471 ay önce

I’d like to know how you have surmised such? Methodologies please? IMO that’s a sphere…not a balloon. The ground is a shit ton clearer than the object that’s closer to the camera…so are you also saying this is out of focus as well? I’ve filmed balloons,& there’s a major difference. On a balloon, there are defined edges. On a Sphere/orb, due to the amount of flat out energy they give off as they spin (which you can commonly observe w/magnification in slow motion,as there are “vents” or some form of markings in many I’ve filmed,& such displays the insane rotation speeds,as well the Govt releases in IR which almost completely confirm this observation). Spheres always disturb the atmosphere all around them so much, that often times like flat out static (not always). If you would like, I can provide you with examples? The only way WE ALL will understand these things better is via open discussion. Otherwise, we’re all just pulling each others dicks. Not trying to sound offensive, but that’s how toxic the UAP community has become these days. Everyone’s an expert, because “Trust me Bro…I know”. We can do better!

Twiitterviewer profil fotoğrafı
Twiitterviewer1 ay önce

clearly a miniture drone from the planet flibber .

newage alternative profil fotoğrafı
newage alternative1 ay önce

Does balloon goes this speed ????

mike whelan profil fotoğrafı
mike whelan1 ay önce

Tell us why the IC wanted emminent domain removed from Schumer's disclosure bill. Stuff like that... the harder stuff. Tell us why so many intelligence professionals are testifying to congress, and behind closed doors to the ICIG about the legacy program.

Zeek profil fotoğrafı
Zeek1 ay önce

Why not try to debunk The Sphere Network. By @PatrickQJackson. Oh, thats right you can't.

Thomas profil fotoğrafı
Thomas1 ay önce

I really hope that any alien race we encounter will be called Parallax, just for the fun of it 😂

Grievous Queef profil fotoğrafı
Grievous Queef1 ay önce

how about getting the entire vid so we all can agree. anyone here seen it? anyone???

JR profil fotoğrafı
JR1 ay önce

That balloon must have aliens in it

Hoax Buster profil fotoğrafı
Hoax Buster1 ay önce

Simulated?

Mick West profil fotoğrafı
Mick West1 ay önce

Yes

Cryptard profil fotoğrafı
Cryptard1 ay önce

“tHe oRb dEfiEd tHe LaWs of pHysiCs!”

Regular Dick profil fotoğrafı
Regular Dick1 ay önce

☀️🎈🌎 (Not to Scale)

PNW_Wapiti profil fotoğrafı
PNW_Wapiti1 ay önce

Why pick the easy ones? Oh, never mind, I know why.

James Pierce profil fotoğrafı
James Pierce1 ay önce

UFOligy is dead. Stop kicking it.

Mick West profil fotoğrafı
Mick West1 ay önce

UFOs are going to continue to be seen and misidentified. This type of thing (WIP) helps people understand what they are looking at in the PERSUE videos.

James Pierce profil fotoğrafı
James Pierce1 ay önce

So you're saying there's a chance? :]

Mick West profil fotoğrafı
Mick West1 ay önce

Several!

PsiloCyan95 profil fotoğrafı
PsiloCyan951 ay önce

Is it possible to find out how fast the camera is moving? If so, could you then sort of ballpark how slow/fast the balloon would have to move to look that way in that specific geographic area?

SpaceBob profil fotoğrafı
SpaceBob1 ay önce

Show me the ballon and parallax as a comparison

Nippon Steel profil fotoğrafı
Nippon Steel1 ay önce

Mick West is hallucinating again. That object is obviously moving in a straight trajectory. He's trying to say this is the parallax effect. Bwhahaha. Try again.

Trevor MacKenzie profil fotoğrafı
Trevor MacKenzie1 ay önce

Pshhh I ain’t never seen a balloon paralaxing from my point of view!

Mick West profil fotoğrafı
Mick West1 ay önce

If you were moving when you saw a balloon, then you have.

Dave Christian profil fotoğrafı
Dave Christian1 ay önce

@TrevorMacK51061 Isn't it amazing how the USAF spends all it's time chasing down balloons, in fact, there must be so many balloons they just can't avoid them. Why, the USAF must be absolutely exhausted, and all that money wasted...phew!

Mick West profil fotoğrafı
Mick West1 ay önce

@TrevorMacK51061 Yes, it’s a problem.

Dave Christian profil fotoğrafı
Dave Christian1 ay önce

@TrevorMacK51061 Dear Mick, you put a lot of trust in AARO. It's almost... suspicious. I'm going to dismiss that chart, because it doesn't include UAP. Plus AARO isn't really transparent about things.

Mick West profil fotoğrafı
Mick West1 ay önce

@TrevorMacK51061 Those are resolved cases that were initially reported as UAP.

babyUFO profil fotoğrafı
babyUFO1 ay önce

@grok what is the ground speed of the object?

homme2lombre profil fotoğrafı
homme2lombre1 ay önce

Your job sucks really, you keep seing ballons seaguls and insects everyday, everywhere 😂

Flup profil fotoğrafı
Flup1 ay önce

but ... but ... it's an orb

DJR profil fotoğrafı
DJR1 ay önce

New tranche being released this week or so I've heard.

Fate profil fotoğrafı
Fate1 ay önce

You mean ALIEN Balloon + Parallax 👽

Benzer Videolar