Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

BANGER: Justice Alito has a sentence in this ruling that immediately caught the eyes: "The Constitution almost never permits a to discriminate on the basis of race." NEVER BLACKPILL

Gunther Eagleman™

1,741,483 subscribers

342,182 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

As Chief Justice Roberts once said, “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race, is to stop discriminating based on race." Despite the best attempts of the Austin swamp, I will not stop doing everything I can to ensure the state of Texas and our agencies abolish DEI... and never again discriminate, for purposes of employment or contract determinations, on the basis of race. Texans deserve nothing less.

As Chief Justice Roberts once said, “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race, is to stop discriminating based on race." Despite the best attempts of the Austin swamp, I will not stop doing everything I can to ensure the state of Texas and our agencies abolish DEI... and never again discriminate, for purposes of employment or contract determinations, on the basis of race. Texans deserve nothing less.

Brian Harrison

22,111 views • 1 year ago

WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz breaks down the 6-3 Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais: “The court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution.” Cruz explained: “The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision. Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion. And in that opinion, the court vindicated the Constitution of the United States. And in particular the 14th Amendment that ensures that all persons in the United States are entitled to equal protection of the laws, and also the 15th Amendment which protects the right to vote regardless of race. And what the court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution. I think that question is absolutely correct. Uh as Chief Justice Roberts wrote in a previous case, it is a sorted business this divying us up by race. He also said the best way to stop discriminating on race is to stop discriminating based on race. And and I think the court's decision here says our government should be blind to color. We should be colorblind. We should not discriminate in favor of or against any race. I think the Supreme Court is correct and and and that uh that is the result of decades of litigation to to to get these racial gerrymanders struck down.”

WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz breaks down the 6-3 Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais: “The court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution.” Cruz explained: “The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision. Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion. And in that opinion, the court vindicated the Constitution of the United States. And in particular the 14th Amendment that ensures that all persons in the United States are entitled to equal protection of the laws, and also the 15th Amendment which protects the right to vote regardless of race. And what the court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution. I think that question is absolutely correct. Uh as Chief Justice Roberts wrote in a previous case, it is a sorted business this divying us up by race. He also said the best way to stop discriminating on race is to stop discriminating based on race. And and I think the court's decision here says our government should be blind to color. We should be colorblind. We should not discriminate in favor of or against any race. I think the Supreme Court is correct and and and that uh that is the result of decades of litigation to to to get these racial gerrymanders struck down.”

Steve Guest

115,581 views • 3 months ago

Gorsuch got the lady to admit that discrimination isn't bad if it's used for minorities to get 'justice.' Gorsuch: "Do [states] have the breathing room to intentionally discriminate on the basis of race?" Liberal: "They have breathing room to use race to remedy their own discrimination."

Gorsuch got the lady to admit that discrimination isn't bad if it's used for minorities to get 'justice.' Gorsuch: "Do [states] have the breathing room to intentionally discriminate on the basis of race?" Liberal: "They have breathing room to use race to remedy their own discrimination."

Gunther Eagleman™

556,050 views • 10 months ago

Public accommodations cannot discriminate on the basis of race, religion, or national origin. The DOJ Civil Rights Division Division U.S. Department of Justice has sent an investigative demand letter to the NYC coffee shop that denied Rep. Goldman service. We will NOT tolerate illegal discrimination!

Public accommodations cannot discriminate on the basis of race, religion, or national origin. The DOJ Civil Rights Division Division U.S. Department of Justice has sent an investigative demand letter to the NYC coffee shop that denied Rep. Goldman service. We will NOT tolerate illegal discrimination!

AAGHarmeetDhillon

39,704 views • 1 month ago

Must Listen: Justice Alito takes a sledgehammer to the Left’s argument that Idaho’s law “violates” the Equal Protection Clause: “What you seem to be saying is, yes, it is permissible for the school to discriminate on the basis of transgender status, because if this person is a trans woman, a trans girl, and is barred from the team, from the girls’ team, then that person is being subjected to differential treatment based on transgender status, right?”

Must Listen: Justice Alito takes a sledgehammer to the Left’s argument that Idaho’s law “violates” the Equal Protection Clause: “What you seem to be saying is, yes, it is permissible for the school to discriminate on the basis of transgender status, because if this person is a trans woman, a trans girl, and is barred from the team, from the girls’ team, then that person is being subjected to differential treatment based on transgender status, right?”

Carrie Severino

117,960 views • 7 months ago

“The whole idea of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution was to make sure that our presidents never turned into kings.” @beschlossdc on the Supreme Court's presidential immunity ruling.

“The whole idea of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution was to make sure that our presidents never turned into kings.” @beschlossdc on the Supreme Court's presidential immunity ruling.

Money Power Politics with Stephanie Ruhle

96,923 views • 2 years ago

Dipu Das’s family has taken to the streets demanding justice. In the last 50 years,there has never been justice for the k!lling of a Hindu in Bangladesh,bcz the constitution has effectively reduced non-Mslims to 2nd class status.Even members of civil society do not stand with us.

Dipu Das’s family has taken to the streets demanding justice. In the last 50 years,there has never been justice for the k!lling of a Hindu in Bangladesh,bcz the constitution has effectively reduced non-Mslims to 2nd class status.Even members of civil society do not stand with us.

Voice Of BD Hindus 🇧🇩

158,135 views • 7 months ago

Unless the military government is openly admitting that the constitution in the country is suspended, the citizens of Khyber Pakhthunkhwa must not be deprived of a Chief Executive. The Constitution permits the provincial Chief Justice to administer the oath if the Governor refuses to do so. #CMKPSohailAfridi

Unless the military government is openly admitting that the constitution in the country is suspended, the citizens of Khyber Pakhthunkhwa must not be deprived of a Chief Executive. The Constitution permits the provincial Chief Justice to administer the oath if the Governor refuses to do so. #CMKPSohailAfridi

PTI USA Official

10,721 views • 10 months ago

🔥🚨 BREAKING: Conservative Supreme Court Justice, Samuel Alito, PUMMELS the Transgender Attorney who is arguing for Men in Women's Sports. ALITO: "How can a court determine whether there is discrimination on the basis of sex WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT SEX MEANS for equal protection purposes?" HARTNETT: *STUMBLES* "We are taking the statutes' definitions as we find them." ALITO: "Suppose this school has a boys' track team and a girls track team. The school has that. And a student who has the genes and the reproductive system of a male and had those at birth and has never taken puberty blockers, never taken female hormones, never had any gender-altering or affirming surgery says, nevertheless, I am a woman. That's who I am. Can the school say no, you cannot participate on the girls team?" HARTNETT: "Sorry, just a birth sex male who has all the advantages of birth, and can the school bar him from the women's team? Yes, they can." ALITO: "Is that person not a woman in your understanding, the person says I sincerely believe I am a woman and I'm in fact a woman. Is that person not a woman?" HARTNETT: "I would respect their self-identity in addressing the person."

🔥🚨 BREAKING: Conservative Supreme Court Justice, Samuel Alito, PUMMELS the Transgender Attorney who is arguing for Men in Women's Sports. ALITO: "How can a court determine whether there is discrimination on the basis of sex WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT SEX MEANS for equal protection purposes?" HARTNETT: STUMBLES "We are taking the statutes' definitions as we find them." ALITO: "Suppose this school has a boys' track team and a girls track team. The school has that. And a student who has the genes and the reproductive system of a male and had those at birth and has never taken puberty blockers, never taken female hormones, never had any gender-altering or affirming surgery says, nevertheless, I am a woman. That's who I am. Can the school say no, you cannot participate on the girls team?" HARTNETT: "Sorry, just a birth sex male who has all the advantages of birth, and can the school bar him from the women's team? Yes, they can." ALITO: "Is that person not a woman in your understanding, the person says I sincerely believe I am a woman and I'm in fact a woman. Is that person not a woman?" HARTNETT: "I would respect their self-identity in addressing the person."

The Patriot Oasis™

207,772 views • 7 months ago

Supreme Court Associate Justice Samuel Alito joins Peter Robinson on Uncommon Knowledge to discuss the principles that guide his judicial philosophy. From his majority opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson to his views on originalism, precedent, and the role of the courts in American democracy, Alito offers a candid defense of the Constitution as a fixed and enduring document. He explores the meaning of the Equal Protection Clause, the limits of judicial power, and the tensions surrounding race-conscious policies. Justice Alito also reflects on the practical realities of the Court and the deeper meaning of constitutional interpretation—speaking with clarity, conviction, and an eye toward the long view of American jurisprudence. Watch the full episode of Uncommon Knowledge with Peter Robinson on X:

Supreme Court Associate Justice Samuel Alito joins Peter Robinson on Uncommon Knowledge to discuss the principles that guide his judicial philosophy. From his majority opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson to his views on originalism, precedent, and the role of the courts in American democracy, Alito offers a candid defense of the Constitution as a fixed and enduring document. He explores the meaning of the Equal Protection Clause, the limits of judicial power, and the tensions surrounding race-conscious policies. Justice Alito also reflects on the practical realities of the Court and the deeper meaning of constitutional interpretation—speaking with clarity, conviction, and an eye toward the long view of American jurisprudence. Watch the full episode of Uncommon Knowledge with Peter Robinson on X:

Hoover Institution

27,424 views • 1 year ago

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. SCOTUS Justice Sam Alito just EVISCERATED the attorney's argument for a transgender male trying to compete in girl's sports Every word. Masterful. ALITO: Let's say a school has a boy and girl track team. A male student with no puberty blockers or female hormones, or surgeries, says, 'I AM A WOMAN. That's who I am.' Can the school say, 'No, you can't participate?' ATTORNEY: Yes... ALITO: Is that person not a WOMAN in your understanding?! They SAY they're a woman. Are they not a woman, then? ATTORNEY: Well, I'd respect their pronouns... ALITO: You seem to be saying the school can discriminate on the basis of transgender status! If this person is a "transgender woman" and is barred from the girls' team, that person is being subjected to differential treatment based on transgender status, right? Sam Alito is awesome🔥🔥🔥

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. SCOTUS Justice Sam Alito just EVISCERATED the attorney's argument for a transgender male trying to compete in girl's sports Every word. Masterful. ALITO: Let's say a school has a boy and girl track team. A male student with no puberty blockers or female hormones, or surgeries, says, 'I AM A WOMAN. That's who I am.' Can the school say, 'No, you can't participate?' ATTORNEY: Yes... ALITO: Is that person not a WOMAN in your understanding?! They SAY they're a woman. Are they not a woman, then? ATTORNEY: Well, I'd respect their pronouns... ALITO: You seem to be saying the school can discriminate on the basis of transgender status! If this person is a "transgender woman" and is barred from the girls' team, that person is being subjected to differential treatment based on transgender status, right? Sam Alito is awesome🔥🔥🔥

Eric Daugherty

1,347,778 views • 7 months ago

Today is a heavy day. For the families who lost their children, for the community of Moscow, and for the entire state of Idaho. While no sentence can bring full justice to this kind of evil, today’s sentence ensures that Bryan Kohberger will never see the outside of a prison and will never again harm innocent life. Please continue to keep the families in your prayers—not just today, but in the days and years to come. Their grief does not end with a sentence, and neither should our care for them.

Today is a heavy day. For the families who lost their children, for the community of Moscow, and for the entire state of Idaho. While no sentence can bring full justice to this kind of evil, today’s sentence ensures that Bryan Kohberger will never see the outside of a prison and will never again harm innocent life. Please continue to keep the families in your prayers—not just today, but in the days and years to come. Their grief does not end with a sentence, and neither should our care for them.

Attorney General Raúl R. Labrador

11,259 views • 1 year ago

Justice Alito has never been impressed by the elitism of Washington, D.C.—a rare trait among those in high office, but one noticed and appreciated by everyone who encounters him.

Justice Alito has never been impressed by the elitism of Washington, D.C.—a rare trait among those in high office, but one noticed and appreciated by everyone who encounters him.

Heritage Foundation

15,652 views • 3 months ago

The best way to stop discrimination on the basis of race… …is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.

The best way to stop discrimination on the basis of race… …is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.

Vivek Ramaswamy

76,754 views • 3 years ago

ALERT: San Francisco Judge rules that reparations are not discriminatory during lawsuit hearing. San Francisco Superior Court Judge Joseph Quinn sustained a demurrer, a legal term meaning that even if all the facts the plaintiff alleges are true, they do not state a valid legal claim in a lawsuit over race-based reparations. "We are disappointed by the Superior Court's ruling, but remain undeterred. The government cannot use taxpayer money to administer funds for programs that discriminate on the basis of race. The next step will be to either amend the complaint or appeal."

ALERT: San Francisco Judge rules that reparations are not discriminatory during lawsuit hearing. San Francisco Superior Court Judge Joseph Quinn sustained a demurrer, a legal term meaning that even if all the facts the plaintiff alleges are true, they do not state a valid legal claim in a lawsuit over race-based reparations. "We are disappointed by the Superior Court's ruling, but remain undeterred. The government cannot use taxpayer money to administer funds for programs that discriminate on the basis of race. The next step will be to either amend the complaint or appeal."

E X X ➠A L E R T S

37,775 views • 2 months ago

.Mary Margaret Olohan's take on today's retracted NPR report claiming Justice Alito is retiring: "My guess is that she had a tip that Justice Alito was going to retire, and she prepped a story for it...and they accidentally published it in the flurry of the SCOTUS reporting this morning."

.Mary Margaret Olohan's take on today's retracted NPR report claiming Justice Alito is retiring: "My guess is that she had a tip that Justice Alito was going to retire, and she prepped a story for it...and they accidentally published it in the flurry of the SCOTUS reporting this morning."

Daily Wire

116,992 views • 1 month ago

You will really never know all the great things going on in people’s homes. Never blackpill.

You will really never know all the great things going on in people’s homes. Never blackpill.

Anna Riedl

413,578 views • 7 months ago

"I'll give the lawyer for Sorsby credit. The way he framed the argument was that the NCAA constitution says you can't discriminate against players on a basis of mental illness, and he basically has an addiction to gambling and you can't discriminate against him based on that... I think that's crazy, but that was the way he framed the argument... I don't think it'll hold up." Longtime attorney, Marty Sipple, joined Early Break this morning to weigh in on the Brendan Sorsby situation. 📸courtesy Yahoo Sports Jake Sorensen | Steven Sipple

"I'll give the lawyer for Sorsby credit. The way he framed the argument was that the NCAA constitution says you can't discriminate against players on a basis of mental illness, and he basically has an addiction to gambling and you can't discriminate against him based on that... I think that's crazy, but that was the way he framed the argument... I don't think it'll hold up." Longtime attorney, Marty Sipple, joined Early Break this morning to weigh in on the Brendan Sorsby situation. 📸courtesy Yahoo Sports Jake Sorensen | Steven Sipple

93.7 The Ticket

57,309 views • 2 months ago