正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

BANNON: Is there anybody here, even the hardest core hawk, that would back a major military engagement like Iraq, boots on the ground, long-term commitment? AUDIENCE: No! BOLLING: Whoa. I forgot the best part of this. First, we bomb the living daylights out of them. You get them to... show more

Grace Chong, MBI

194,532 subscribers

58,290 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

‼️Tom Aspinall plans to beat the ‘living daylights’ out of Ciryl Gane "Obviously, the plan is to go back and beat the living daylights out of Ciryl Gane, But right now, the short-term plan is to get back to where I should be, to get back in the gym." Via One on One MMA

‼️Tom Aspinall plans to beat the ‘living daylights’ out of Ciryl Gane "Obviously, the plan is to go back and beat the living daylights out of Ciryl Gane, But right now, the short-term plan is to get back to where I should be, to get back in the gym." Via One on One MMA

Dovy🔌

93,507 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨INFRASTRUCTURE DAY!! President Trump has just spent the last few minutes, in Classic Trump fashion, warning Iran that the only day they DON'T WANT to happen is right around the corner: "Look, we're NOT attacking at the highest level. The highest level of the bridges there, which we can knock down. I would say in one day we knock down every single bridge in Iran." "There's NOT A THING they can do about it." "Their electric manufacturing facilities, right? Their electric plants where they make their electricity. And there we will, we have to TAKE THEM OUT. I don't want to do that, but if we have to, we'll take them They have desalinization plants." "We'll take them out if we have to. I hate to do that. That's probably the one I would like not to do." I wouldn't go pushing Trump's buttons much longer.

🚨INFRASTRUCTURE DAY!! President Trump has just spent the last few minutes, in Classic Trump fashion, warning Iran that the only day they DON'T WANT to happen is right around the corner: "Look, we're NOT attacking at the highest level. The highest level of the bridges there, which we can knock down. I would say in one day we knock down every single bridge in Iran." "There's NOT A THING they can do about it." "Their electric manufacturing facilities, right? Their electric plants where they make their electricity. And there we will, we have to TAKE THEM OUT. I don't want to do that, but if we have to, we'll take them They have desalinization plants." "We'll take them out if we have to. I hate to do that. That's probably the one I would like not to do." I wouldn't go pushing Trump's buttons much longer.

Gunther Eagleman™

161,502 次观看 • 1 个月前

CNBC’s Joe Kernen put Nikki Haley on the spot after she accused the Trump administration of “caving” on Iran. Kernen repeatedly pressed her to explain what “finish the job” actually means...and whether she’s willing to support a longer military conflict to achieve it. KERNEN: “If you’re pessimistic about how much… concessions we can get in this MOU to actually sign on the dotted line, so that let’s say that doesn’t happen.” “How long and what are you proposing? What are you proposing and how long are you willing to do it?” “Would you go into another six months of, of really, you know, something like an Iraq situation, like a surge or something?” “I mean, are we talking boots on the ground?…” “Would you go in for another six months of protracted combat if you had to?” HALEY: “I don’t think it would take another six months.” “But the real question is, it’s not do we go back in, it’s do you leave Iran stronger than they were pre-war?” “Are we willing to allow that to happen? Are we willing to allow them to threaten all the ships that go through the Strait of Hormuz?” “Are we willing to allow them to continue to fund their terrorist proxies?” “Are we willing to have them go and continue their nuclear ambitions?” “The answer to all three of those is no, we don’t like those answers. But at the end of the day, if you started it, you have to finish it.” “And this is one where this is not the U.S. alone. We need to get our Gulf allies. We need to get the Europeans. We need to finish this.” “The Gulf allies do not want to be in this situation right now. They were encouraging President Trump to finish the deal. When he is pulled back, they’re not happy with that. Our European allies are not happy with where we are. We need to pull them all together and finish this.” “This is not going to take six months. This is going to take commitment to say, finish the job, bring Iran to their knees.” “Stop with the release of the frozen assets, stop with the sanction waivers and finish what you started. They were weak already. We had them at the weakest they had ever been. And then we caved.” “That can’t happen.”

CNBC’s Joe Kernen put Nikki Haley on the spot after she accused the Trump administration of “caving” on Iran. Kernen repeatedly pressed her to explain what “finish the job” actually means...and whether she’s willing to support a longer military conflict to achieve it. KERNEN: “If you’re pessimistic about how much… concessions we can get in this MOU to actually sign on the dotted line, so that let’s say that doesn’t happen.” “How long and what are you proposing? What are you proposing and how long are you willing to do it?” “Would you go into another six months of, of really, you know, something like an Iraq situation, like a surge or something?” “I mean, are we talking boots on the ground?…” “Would you go in for another six months of protracted combat if you had to?” HALEY: “I don’t think it would take another six months.” “But the real question is, it’s not do we go back in, it’s do you leave Iran stronger than they were pre-war?” “Are we willing to allow that to happen? Are we willing to allow them to threaten all the ships that go through the Strait of Hormuz?” “Are we willing to allow them to continue to fund their terrorist proxies?” “Are we willing to have them go and continue their nuclear ambitions?” “The answer to all three of those is no, we don’t like those answers. But at the end of the day, if you started it, you have to finish it.” “And this is one where this is not the U.S. alone. We need to get our Gulf allies. We need to get the Europeans. We need to finish this.” “The Gulf allies do not want to be in this situation right now. They were encouraging President Trump to finish the deal. When he is pulled back, they’re not happy with that. Our European allies are not happy with where we are. We need to pull them all together and finish this.” “This is not going to take six months. This is going to take commitment to say, finish the job, bring Iran to their knees.” “Stop with the release of the frozen assets, stop with the sanction waivers and finish what you started. They were weak already. We had them at the weakest they had ever been. And then we caved.” “That can’t happen.”

Overton

32,624 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 WHOA! President Trump just delivered a massive FAFO warning to Iran: "In one half of a day, they wouldn't have ONE bridge standing. They wouldn't have ONE electric generating plant standing. And they're back in the stone ages. I'd rather not do that!" "But I do believe they're going to come to the table on this because nobody can be so stupid as to say that we want to have nuclear weapons." "I could take out Iran in one day. I could take down in one in one hour." "I could have their entire energy, everything, every one of their plants, their electric generating plants, which is a big deal." "And I hate to do it because if I do it, it takes you 10 years to rebuild. They'll never be able to rebuild it." "And the other thing you take out of the bridges. I took out one just to show them because they went public with a statement that wasn't true. They admitted it." "I say, I'm going to take out a bridge. And I took out a bridge. And that was the end of that. Now they've been really behaving quite well."

🚨 WHOA! President Trump just delivered a massive FAFO warning to Iran: "In one half of a day, they wouldn't have ONE bridge standing. They wouldn't have ONE electric generating plant standing. And they're back in the stone ages. I'd rather not do that!" "But I do believe they're going to come to the table on this because nobody can be so stupid as to say that we want to have nuclear weapons." "I could take out Iran in one day. I could take down in one in one hour." "I could have their entire energy, everything, every one of their plants, their electric generating plants, which is a big deal." "And I hate to do it because if I do it, it takes you 10 years to rebuild. They'll never be able to rebuild it." "And the other thing you take out of the bridges. I took out one just to show them because they went public with a statement that wasn't true. They admitted it." "I say, I'm going to take out a bridge. And I took out a bridge. And that was the end of that. Now they've been really behaving quite well."

Eric Daugherty

204,526 次观看 • 4 个月前

"In 'Zodiac' (2007), I wanted the audience to feel like they went through the ringer with these guys,(...) in retrospect you look at it & say maybe audiences who are looking for entertainment on a Friday night don’t want that toll taken on them." --- David Fincher Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: It’s so rare to walk out of a movie and to feel like I know more about a subject than I did walking into it. Watching Zodiac is like the experience of reading a really absorbing non-fiction book, and I know that part of it for you was about honoring the people who were the victims of the Zodiac, but you also have so many details, so many facts, you take it to such a level where there’s so much information… why was that important to you? Fincher: I don’t respect movies that treat me like I don’t have the attention span or mental faculty to follow… it’s one thing to talk about Dave Toschi’s fall from grace in an oblique and generic way. I can answer that question in a couple of different ways. I wanted the movie to take its toll on the audience, I wanted the audience to feel like they went through it, like they went through the ringer with these guys, and I didn’t know how to do that because these guys didn’t run across rooftops and fall off fire escapes. In their quest to bring the Zodiac to justice they followed the trail of breadcrumbs as far as it would take them, and they kept pushing and kept pushing when there were crackpots coming out of the woodwork. I felt like I didn’t want to make one of those movies where you do montage/montage/montage and you get the idea that they went to the mat with this, that it took its toll – I wanted the audience to feel that. You know, in retrospect you look at it and say maybe audiences who are looking for entertainment on a Friday night don’t want that toll taken on them. I felt like anything less than that would be doing the story and people involved a disservice. You could do it as something compressed, where you get the gist of it, and we would have shots of Jake [Gyllenhaal] half asleep and you would have those obligatory shots where the boss says, ‘You look like sh!t.’ And in the end I still don’t feel like you get enough of what happens with his family, we don’t get enough with his wife and kids, but it was all we could do to get it in at under two hours and forty minutes. I feel like we took about as much time as you can really expect an audience to sit still for and we tried to make them feel what it was like to be invested in this circuitous run down the rabbit hole." (David Fincher's interview with Devin Farachi, 2008)

"In 'Zodiac' (2007), I wanted the audience to feel like they went through the ringer with these guys,(...) in retrospect you look at it & say maybe audiences who are looking for entertainment on a Friday night don’t want that toll taken on them." --- David Fincher Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: It’s so rare to walk out of a movie and to feel like I know more about a subject than I did walking into it. Watching Zodiac is like the experience of reading a really absorbing non-fiction book, and I know that part of it for you was about honoring the people who were the victims of the Zodiac, but you also have so many details, so many facts, you take it to such a level where there’s so much information… why was that important to you? Fincher: I don’t respect movies that treat me like I don’t have the attention span or mental faculty to follow… it’s one thing to talk about Dave Toschi’s fall from grace in an oblique and generic way. I can answer that question in a couple of different ways. I wanted the movie to take its toll on the audience, I wanted the audience to feel like they went through it, like they went through the ringer with these guys, and I didn’t know how to do that because these guys didn’t run across rooftops and fall off fire escapes. In their quest to bring the Zodiac to justice they followed the trail of breadcrumbs as far as it would take them, and they kept pushing and kept pushing when there were crackpots coming out of the woodwork. I felt like I didn’t want to make one of those movies where you do montage/montage/montage and you get the idea that they went to the mat with this, that it took its toll – I wanted the audience to feel that. You know, in retrospect you look at it and say maybe audiences who are looking for entertainment on a Friday night don’t want that toll taken on them. I felt like anything less than that would be doing the story and people involved a disservice. You could do it as something compressed, where you get the gist of it, and we would have shots of Jake [Gyllenhaal] half asleep and you would have those obligatory shots where the boss says, ‘You look like sh!t.’ And in the end I still don’t feel like you get enough of what happens with his family, we don’t get enough with his wife and kids, but it was all we could do to get it in at under two hours and forty minutes. I feel like we took about as much time as you can really expect an audience to sit still for and we tried to make them feel what it was like to be invested in this circuitous run down the rabbit hole." (David Fincher's interview with Devin Farachi, 2008)

DepressedBergman

19,335 次观看 • 5 个月前

Schumer: We’ve got to make sure we get all of the Epstein files. All of them. They can’t fuck around with this. They can’t say, “Oh, we’ll give you this, but there are legal reasons we can’t give you that.” We are going to be pursuing them relentlessly to get everything, because I don’t trust this administration. I don’t trust Bondi. I don’t trust Kash Patel. I don’t trust the president. It’ll be all of our jobs to stay on them.

Schumer: We’ve got to make sure we get all of the Epstein files. All of them. They can’t fuck around with this. They can’t say, “Oh, we’ll give you this, but there are legal reasons we can’t give you that.” We are going to be pursuing them relentlessly to get everything, because I don’t trust this administration. I don’t trust Bondi. I don’t trust Kash Patel. I don’t trust the president. It’ll be all of our jobs to stay on them.

Acyn

668,782 次观看 • 8 个月前

BOLLING: You can’t bomb them into the Stone Age in a couple of weeks. It would take months, maybe years, to do that. So the lack of a defined off-ramp or a timetable is what really spooked and is right now spooking the oil market badly.

BOLLING: You can’t bomb them into the Stone Age in a couple of weeks. It would take months, maybe years, to do that. So the lack of a defined off-ramp or a timetable is what really spooked and is right now spooking the oil market badly.

Grace Chong, MBI

13,679 次观看 • 4 个月前

Paul Pierce says the Draft Lottery is rigged: “I think they be like, “Here, man. We going to give this motherfu*ker here. We gonna give them this.” Come on, like Dallas out of all people got the number one pick. They just lost Luka. Hell no….. I’m telling you, this what goes on in the back room. They congregate. These is billion-dollar people. They get in a room, then you got the commissioner in there. And to all the weak teams, we’re giving the number one pick to the highest bidder. Who wants it? Two billon, talking three. This is what’s going on in the back room for the number one pick. So, if they willing to sacrifice that money and these low market teams who got the big couple dollars for that number one pick, if they think it’s going to change their franchise, they paying for it. I’m telling you, this what’s going on in the back room.” (Via No Fouls Given)

Paul Pierce says the Draft Lottery is rigged: “I think they be like, “Here, man. We going to give this motherfu*ker here. We gonna give them this.” Come on, like Dallas out of all people got the number one pick. They just lost Luka. Hell no….. I’m telling you, this what goes on in the back room. They congregate. These is billion-dollar people. They get in a room, then you got the commissioner in there. And to all the weak teams, we’re giving the number one pick to the highest bidder. Who wants it? Two billon, talking three. This is what’s going on in the back room for the number one pick. So, if they willing to sacrifice that money and these low market teams who got the big couple dollars for that number one pick, if they think it’s going to change their franchise, they paying for it. I’m telling you, this what’s going on in the back room.” (Via No Fouls Given)

NBA Courtside

105,256 次观看 • 4 个月前

I'm going to say something that doesn't reflect well on me or my wife. We let the kids have the iPad for too long. Way too long. We realized that it was ruining their personalities. I watched it happen and I didn't act fast enough. We took the iPads away. Took the phones. All of it. And I got my children back. They’ve been de-zombified. The difference was immediate and it was dramatic. So let me give credit where it's due. Shout out to Jonathan Haidt. Shout out to Kara Swisher You think you're giving your kid entertainment. A way to decompress. Something to keep them occupied. You're handing them something that is quietly rewiring how they think, how they feel, and how they connect with the people right in front of them. Take it away. You'll get your kid back too. I promise you won’t regret it!

I'm going to say something that doesn't reflect well on me or my wife. We let the kids have the iPad for too long. Way too long. We realized that it was ruining their personalities. I watched it happen and I didn't act fast enough. We took the iPads away. Took the phones. All of it. And I got my children back. They’ve been de-zombified. The difference was immediate and it was dramatic. So let me give credit where it's due. Shout out to Jonathan Haidt. Shout out to Kara Swisher You think you're giving your kid entertainment. A way to decompress. Something to keep them occupied. You're handing them something that is quietly rewiring how they think, how they feel, and how they connect with the people right in front of them. Take it away. You'll get your kid back too. I promise you won’t regret it!

Anthony Scaramucci

600,403 次观看 • 4 个月前

“If I were Russia and China, I would let Iran play out longer. I would let the U.S. use more of its military warfighting capability, and then when they’ve played it down enough, I would go take Taiwan. It’s what they wanted to do for a long time, but we are kind of holding them back. If I were China, I would say, let’s let them play this out, we’ll let them get tired—once they’re tired, we’ll do what we want to do, and they won’t be able to stop us because they’re going to be too tired to come over here and do that.” Michael T. Lester

“If I were Russia and China, I would let Iran play out longer. I would let the U.S. use more of its military warfighting capability, and then when they’ve played it down enough, I would go take Taiwan. It’s what they wanted to do for a long time, but we are kind of holding them back. If I were China, I would say, let’s let them play this out, we’ll let them get tired—once they’re tired, we’ll do what we want to do, and they won’t be able to stop us because they’re going to be too tired to come over here and do that.” Michael T. Lester

Shawn Ryan

644,309 次观看 • 4 个月前

Trump’s Demand for Return of U.S. Military Equipment from Afghanistan It’s their form of a military parade, and it makes me angry when I see that. Angry. When I see that, I get angry. You know, we give them I don’t think anyone knows this. We give Afghanistan about 2 or 2 and a half billion dollars yet. Do you know that? For aid. Aid. We need aid ourself. We give and I’m gonna go back and, I told them yesterday, I wanna look at it, but if we’re gonna give them money, it’s okay. But I want them to give us back our military equipment that they have. They’re selling it. Doug, would you take that, please? Alright. Write something up. No. I want them to give back. If we’re gonna give them that kind of money, let them give back the military equipment, which, they have where they have tanks and trucks and guns and goggles. They have goggles. They have night goggles. Better than we have. Brand new right out of the box. It’s unbelievable. So I wanna do that, and I want the, if we’re gonna pay him, I wanna get that equipment back. Okay? Doug can do it. He’s one of the guys. He’s a business guy. They hear me sitting there saying, how the hell did this ever happen? Right? Can you believe it? We give them billions of dollars and we gave them our military equipment. Just tremendous numbers of billions of dollars worth of milli billions and billion.

Polymarket Intel

106,303 次观看 • 1 年前

[Q]: You ruled out boots on the ground in Ukraine, but how would air support as part of a security guarantee be any different? Wouldn't those US airmen also be in danger? President Trump: Well, you don't know what security guarantee because we haven't even discussed the specifics of it. Number one, Europe is going to give them significant security guarantees, and they should because they're right there. But we'll be involved from the standpoint of backup. We're going to help them. And I think if we get a deal, and I think we will, but if we get a deal, I don't believe you're going to have much of a problem. But we'll back it up because I want to stop seeing people being killed.

[Q]: You ruled out boots on the ground in Ukraine, but how would air support as part of a security guarantee be any different? Wouldn't those US airmen also be in danger? President Trump: Well, you don't know what security guarantee because we haven't even discussed the specifics of it. Number one, Europe is going to give them significant security guarantees, and they should because they're right there. But we'll be involved from the standpoint of backup. We're going to help them. And I think if we get a deal, and I think we will, but if we get a deal, I don't believe you're going to have much of a problem. But we'll back it up because I want to stop seeing people being killed.

Anton Gerashchenko

68,021 次观看 • 11 个月前

O’Leary: Do we want the Chinese to train them, or do we want them? We want them. Every single one of them to stay here. And I want them to get their passports, their families get passports, they create jobs, and I will invest in them. Every single one.

O’Leary: Do we want the Chinese to train them, or do we want them? We want them. Every single one of them to stay here. And I want them to get their passports, their families get passports, they create jobs, and I will invest in them. Every single one.

Acyn

121,305 次观看 • 9 个月前

#WhoopiGoldberg: “We’re still here. When I got out of the car today…I saw people living their lives, and that’s what we have to do. And when things get to be so bright that we see them, we gotta call them out.”

#WhoopiGoldberg: “We’re still here. When I got out of the car today…I saw people living their lives, and that’s what we have to do. And when things get to be so bright that we see them, we gotta call them out.”

The View

461,815 次观看 • 1 年前

Trump is one of a kind! Only he would speak this way about Congress to their faces. Historic "We really do. I mean, 96% phenomenal and, uh, 4% extremely difficult. Do you agree with that? But they get there, most of them, not all of them. Those are the ones we really don't like."

Trump is one of a kind! Only he would speak this way about Congress to their faces. Historic "We really do. I mean, 96% phenomenal and, uh, 4% extremely difficult. Do you agree with that? But they get there, most of them, not all of them. Those are the ones we really don't like."

Gunther Eagleman™

55,582 次观看 • 1 年前

Trump explains the history of how Gaza got wrecked by Hamas: "Israel withdrew from Gaza thinking they would live in peace. They said, 'You take it, this is our contribution to peace.' But that didn't work out. They pulled away, they let them have it, and I never forgot that because I said, 'That doesn't sound like a good deal to me,' as a real estate person: They gave up the ocean! Right? Who would do this deal? And it still didn't work out. They were very generous actually, and they gave up the most magnificent piece of land in the Middle East, and they said 'All we want to do is have peace,' and that request was not honored... "Instead of building a better life for their people Hamas devoted their resources to building 400 miles of terror infrastructure, rocket facilities, and hid their military command posts and launch sites in hospitals, schools, and mosques, so if you went after them you wouldn't even realize and you would end up knocking out a hospital or a school or a mosque."

Trump explains the history of how Gaza got wrecked by Hamas: "Israel withdrew from Gaza thinking they would live in peace. They said, 'You take it, this is our contribution to peace.' But that didn't work out. They pulled away, they let them have it, and I never forgot that because I said, 'That doesn't sound like a good deal to me,' as a real estate person: They gave up the ocean! Right? Who would do this deal? And it still didn't work out. They were very generous actually, and they gave up the most magnificent piece of land in the Middle East, and they said 'All we want to do is have peace,' and that request was not honored... "Instead of building a better life for their people Hamas devoted their resources to building 400 miles of terror infrastructure, rocket facilities, and hid their military command posts and launch sites in hospitals, schools, and mosques, so if you went after them you wouldn't even realize and you would end up knocking out a hospital or a school or a mosque."

Saul Sadka

325,077 次观看 • 10 个月前

President Trump: “CNN, fake news.” CNN’s Kristen Holmes: “Are you willing to make a deal that does not include reopening the Strait of Hormuz, or is that now a top priority?” Trump: “I would say it’s a very big priority because you see that’s — that’s one thing that’s a little different than other things. We can bomb the hell out of them. We can knock them out for a loop. But to close the Strait, all you need is one terrorist that somehow has a truck loaded with. Because you can carry them in trucks, large trucks, a water mine, drop them in the water. And now you tell people that own ships that cost $1 billion to don’t worry about the mine. You can do that even just by saying, we put mines in the water. So, it’s not like the rest. We can knock out their military. We already have. We’ve knocked out their navy, we’ve knocked out their air force completely. We knocked out 158 ships in three days. We’ve knocked out even their mine droppers. They don’t have any mind droppers anymore, but they put them on other boats and they could drop them. I’m not even sure they have any mines there, by the way. I’m not sure. I’m — personally, they say there might be a — I don’t know, I don’t know, I think there might be none because they’re very good bullshit artists. That’s why, for 47 years, they’ve been bullshitting other presidents and they haven’t done the job. And people are living in hell. You live in that country. They’re living in hell. No, I think that 47 years of this stuff is long enough. They’re at the weakest point they’ve ever been. They have no navy. They have no air force. They have no anti-aircraft weaponry. They have no radar. They have no communication. In fact, the biggest problem we have in our negotiation is that they can’t communicate. I said to Steve, what are they saying? Sir, they can’t communicate. They have no method of communication. So we’re doing we’re communicating like they used to communicate 2,000 years ago with children, bringing a note back and forth. They have no communication. But all I want to see is I want to have a safe world, and you’re not going to have a safe world. Israel will be gone, the Middle East will be gone, and then they’re coming for Europe. And I have to tell you, I’m very disappointed in NATO. Very. I think that NATO, I think it’s a mark on NATO that will never disappear, never disappear in my mind. You know, they’re coming to see me on Wednesday. They’re going to say, oh, we’ll do this. We’ll do that. Now they all of a sudden want to send things, you know. But they said it loud and clear at the beginning when I spoke to U.K., of all I would have said, they would have been the first because they’ve been there, the oldest. And I say, yeah, I’d love to have a little help. I said, no sir, we’d rather wait till you win. I said, I don’t need help after we win. They have two old broken aircraft carriers. Barely work. I said, I guess we can use them. Who the hell knows? I called the general. He didn’t even want them. He said, we don’t really need them. We got. We got the SS Abraham Lincoln, sir. We don’t need them. You know, we have in terms of technology, we had one day, 101 missiles going at 2,700 miles an hour aimed at the Abraham Lincoln, 101 missiles. Out of 101 missiles, 101 missiles were shot down. Unbelievable technology. Ten years ago, five years ago. I don’t know if that would have been possible, but ten years ago, that wouldn’t have been that wouldn’t have been possible. 101 missiles heading to a ship that’s not that far off the coast. And out of the 101 missiles, we shot down all 101. We have weaponry. The Patriots are unbelievable. We have weaponry. That’s unbelievable.”

President Trump: “CNN, fake news.” CNN’s Kristen Holmes: “Are you willing to make a deal that does not include reopening the Strait of Hormuz, or is that now a top priority?” Trump: “I would say it’s a very big priority because you see that’s — that’s one thing that’s a little different than other things. We can bomb the hell out of them. We can knock them out for a loop. But to close the Strait, all you need is one terrorist that somehow has a truck loaded with. Because you can carry them in trucks, large trucks, a water mine, drop them in the water. And now you tell people that own ships that cost $1 billion to don’t worry about the mine. You can do that even just by saying, we put mines in the water. So, it’s not like the rest. We can knock out their military. We already have. We’ve knocked out their navy, we’ve knocked out their air force completely. We knocked out 158 ships in three days. We’ve knocked out even their mine droppers. They don’t have any mind droppers anymore, but they put them on other boats and they could drop them. I’m not even sure they have any mines there, by the way. I’m not sure. I’m — personally, they say there might be a — I don’t know, I don’t know, I think there might be none because they’re very good bullshit artists. That’s why, for 47 years, they’ve been bullshitting other presidents and they haven’t done the job. And people are living in hell. You live in that country. They’re living in hell. No, I think that 47 years of this stuff is long enough. They’re at the weakest point they’ve ever been. They have no navy. They have no air force. They have no anti-aircraft weaponry. They have no radar. They have no communication. In fact, the biggest problem we have in our negotiation is that they can’t communicate. I said to Steve, what are they saying? Sir, they can’t communicate. They have no method of communication. So we’re doing we’re communicating like they used to communicate 2,000 years ago with children, bringing a note back and forth. They have no communication. But all I want to see is I want to have a safe world, and you’re not going to have a safe world. Israel will be gone, the Middle East will be gone, and then they’re coming for Europe. And I have to tell you, I’m very disappointed in NATO. Very. I think that NATO, I think it’s a mark on NATO that will never disappear, never disappear in my mind. You know, they’re coming to see me on Wednesday. They’re going to say, oh, we’ll do this. We’ll do that. Now they all of a sudden want to send things, you know. But they said it loud and clear at the beginning when I spoke to U.K., of all I would have said, they would have been the first because they’ve been there, the oldest. And I say, yeah, I’d love to have a little help. I said, no sir, we’d rather wait till you win. I said, I don’t need help after we win. They have two old broken aircraft carriers. Barely work. I said, I guess we can use them. Who the hell knows? I called the general. He didn’t even want them. He said, we don’t really need them. We got. We got the SS Abraham Lincoln, sir. We don’t need them. You know, we have in terms of technology, we had one day, 101 missiles going at 2,700 miles an hour aimed at the Abraham Lincoln, 101 missiles. Out of 101 missiles, 101 missiles were shot down. Unbelievable technology. Ten years ago, five years ago. I don’t know if that would have been possible, but ten years ago, that wouldn’t have been that wouldn’t have been possible. 101 missiles heading to a ship that’s not that far off the coast. And out of the 101 missiles, we shot down all 101. We have weaponry. The Patriots are unbelievable. We have weaponry. That’s unbelievable.”

Curtis Houck

1,169,718 次观看 • 4 个月前

“One of the things I find very disturbing is when they’re bombing Venezuelan boats in the Caribbean, you have two [sets of] people talking on western media. One says we should bomb them and get rid of them and take their oil. And the other group days: ‘Well, Maduro is evil and it’s a dictatorship,’ but we should know for me there is no difference between these two…Who are you to say Maduro is evil. Go and say your own government is evil.” - Seyed Mohammad Marandi

“One of the things I find very disturbing is when they’re bombing Venezuelan boats in the Caribbean, you have two [sets of] people talking on western media. One says we should bomb them and get rid of them and take their oil. And the other group days: ‘Well, Maduro is evil and it’s a dictatorship,’ but we should know for me there is no difference between these two…Who are you to say Maduro is evil. Go and say your own government is evil.” - Seyed Mohammad Marandi

Briahna Joy Gray

381,856 次观看 • 4 个月前