Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Bannon: The Fundamentally Wrong 'Greater Israel Project', Remember That. With The Urgency Of The Nuclear Program In Iran. We Know That Now Was A Bald-Faced Lie. The Times Of India Quotes The War Cabinet That Said The Urgency Was 2 Years. As We Said On This Show And I... show more

Bannon’s WarRoom

273,715 subscribers

16,562 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

VP Vance: “I remember when people said that the President of the United States was gonna get us into a multi-hundred thousand regime change war for Israel. This was four months ago—this was six months ago. Now, the people who accuse the President of the United States of wanting to get us into a regime change war for Israel, I wonder if they step back and say, ‘You know what, we were wrong about that.’”

VP Vance: “I remember when people said that the President of the United States was gonna get us into a multi-hundred thousand regime change war for Israel. This was four months ago—this was six months ago. Now, the people who accuse the President of the United States of wanting to get us into a regime change war for Israel, I wonder if they step back and say, ‘You know what, we were wrong about that.’”

Max 📟

503,442 views • 9 months ago

BREAKING: NETANYAHU SAYS HE DOES NOT AGREE WITH TRUMP’S IRAN DEAL & HE TOLD TRUMP ‘WE HAVE OUR OWN INTERESTS’ “This agreement was made by the United States, by the President of the United States, and he believes that he can achieve both supervision and the dismantling of the nuclear program. I said: that is his decision. I repeat: that is his decision. He is leading it. Of course, I expressed my views in various conversations. On the other hand, I said that we have our own interests.”

BREAKING: NETANYAHU SAYS HE DOES NOT AGREE WITH TRUMP’S IRAN DEAL & HE TOLD TRUMP ‘WE HAVE OUR OWN INTERESTS’ “This agreement was made by the United States, by the President of the United States, and he believes that he can achieve both supervision and the dismantling of the nuclear program. I said: that is his decision. I repeat: that is his decision. He is leading it. Of course, I expressed my views in various conversations. On the other hand, I said that we have our own interests.”

Sulaiman Ahmed

959,175 views • 1 month ago

In an interview for #AlMayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi affirmed that “it’s very clear that #Lebanon was a part of the ceasefire,” stressing that both #Iran and the Pakistani Prime Minister stated this explicitly. He highlighted that "The United States is lying. The President of the United States is lying. The Vice President of the United States is lying. All of the officials in the United States are lying." On a related note, he emphasized that the US supports genocide, adding that "The United States supports the slaughter of the Palestinian people. They support the slaughter of the Lebanese people. They support the slaughter of the Iranian people." "It's not that they're indifferent," Seyed Marandi said. "They support it." Seyed Mohammad Marandi

In an interview for #AlMayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi affirmed that “it’s very clear that #Lebanon was a part of the ceasefire,” stressing that both #Iran and the Pakistani Prime Minister stated this explicitly. He highlighted that "The United States is lying. The President of the United States is lying. The Vice President of the United States is lying. All of the officials in the United States are lying." On a related note, he emphasized that the US supports genocide, adding that "The United States supports the slaughter of the Palestinian people. They support the slaughter of the Lebanese people. They support the slaughter of the Iranian people." "It's not that they're indifferent," Seyed Marandi said. "They support it." Seyed Mohammad Marandi

Al Mayadeen English

19,884 views • 4 months ago

President Trump said that "we won" the Iran war but that the United States will stay in the fight to finish the job.

President Trump said that "we won" the Iran war but that the United States will stay in the fight to finish the job.

Reuters

39,031 views • 4 months ago

🚨 ON THE GROUND: RITTER - “IF THE TARGET WAS IRAN'S ENRICHMENT PROGRAM, ISRAEL FAILED” Scott Ritter: "From the global perspective, it's a violation of the United Nations Charter Article 2, Paragraph 4. This is an illegal war of aggression... that puts [Israel] up there with Imperial Japan attacking the United States on Pearl Harbor. Israel said that Iran’s nuclear program posed an existential threat... Now that’s debatable, given ongoing negotiations. If your goal was to eliminate the Iranian nuclear program... Israel failed."

🚨 ON THE GROUND: RITTER - “IF THE TARGET WAS IRAN'S ENRICHMENT PROGRAM, ISRAEL FAILED” Scott Ritter: "From the global perspective, it's a violation of the United Nations Charter Article 2, Paragraph 4. This is an illegal war of aggression... that puts [Israel] up there with Imperial Japan attacking the United States on Pearl Harbor. Israel said that Iran’s nuclear program posed an existential threat... Now that’s debatable, given ongoing negotiations. If your goal was to eliminate the Iranian nuclear program... Israel failed."

Mario Nawfal

166,368 views • 1 year ago

Trump said Israel wasn't going to strike Iran. Israel struck Iran anyway. Was Trump lying, or has Netanyahu made it clear that even the President of the United States doesn't get the final say? For all the talk of Iran being weakened, it is Israel and Washington that increasingly look stupid and unable to dictate events. Tehran has emerged with greater power and leverage than before the war, and now Trump appears eager for a deal that Israel seems determined to sabotage.

Trump said Israel wasn't going to strike Iran. Israel struck Iran anyway. Was Trump lying, or has Netanyahu made it clear that even the President of the United States doesn't get the final say? For all the talk of Iran being weakened, it is Israel and Washington that increasingly look stupid and unable to dictate events. Tehran has emerged with greater power and leverage than before the war, and now Trump appears eager for a deal that Israel seems determined to sabotage.

Bushra Shaikh

16,202 views • 1 month ago

“You know and I know that it was United States that initiated the nuclear program in Iran under Shah’s regime… Apartheid South Africa was looking for a bomb, who helped the Apartheid South Africa? United States and Israel…” #TruthJusticeLove #AbbyPhilipCNN

“You know and I know that it was United States that initiated the nuclear program in Iran under Shah’s regime… Apartheid South Africa was looking for a bomb, who helped the Apartheid South Africa? United States and Israel…” #TruthJusticeLove #AbbyPhilipCNN

Cornel West

73,413 views • 1 year ago

Steve Bannon: “We Have An Agency And An Institution In This Country That Says The Lone Shooter Of The President Of The United States Was On Their Payroll”

Steve Bannon: “We Have An Agency And An Institution In This Country That Says The Lone Shooter Of The President Of The United States Was On Their Payroll”

Bannon’s WarRoom

76,650 views • 1 year ago

French President Macron on Iran: The United States decided to launch this war because they were not satisfied with the negotiations. That was at the end of February this year. What we said at that moment was: we are not going to participate in this war. We do not share the objectives because they do not seem clear to us.

French President Macron on Iran: The United States decided to launch this war because they were not satisfied with the negotiations. That was at the end of February this year. What we said at that moment was: we are not going to participate in this war. We do not share the objectives because they do not seem clear to us.

Clash Report

18,807 views • 1 month ago

PATEL PRAISES LAW ENFORCEMENT “America should be proud that this FBI acted with the urgency that was needed for the moment that we had to answer. The President rightly said that we will act in a unified fashion, and it's because of President Trump's leadership and backing of the blue every single person in law enforcement that I stood with… are thrilled to wear the badge and defend this country.” - FBI Director Kash Patel

PATEL PRAISES LAW ENFORCEMENT “America should be proud that this FBI acted with the urgency that was needed for the moment that we had to answer. The President rightly said that we will act in a unified fashion, and it's because of President Trump's leadership and backing of the blue every single person in law enforcement that I stood with… are thrilled to wear the badge and defend this country.” - FBI Director Kash Patel

Real America's Voice (RAV)

31,628 views • 3 months ago

Mark Kelly: None of us here heard about Iran having missile technology that was able to range the United States or being close to obtaining a nuclear weapon. The last thing we heard from the president was that the Iranian nuclear program was obliterated. That means completely eliminated. Gone.

Mark Kelly: None of us here heard about Iran having missile technology that was able to range the United States or being close to obtaining a nuclear weapon. The last thing we heard from the president was that the Iranian nuclear program was obliterated. That means completely eliminated. Gone.

Blue Georgia

85,741 views • 5 months ago

🚨 ‼️John Mearsheimer 🚨"FIRED "🚨Donald Trump No signs of quick end to US-Israel war on Iran First of all, this argument that, Iran is a great threat to stability in the Middle East, and a serious threat to the United States is nonsense. The greatest threat to stability in the Middle East is the United States, working closely together, with Israel. Iran has not started a war, in centuries as best I can tell. It's not a highly aggressive country. The country in the Middle East that aggressive is Israel. The country that has, committed genocide in Gaza is not Iran, it's Israel, and we were complicit. We meaning the United States is complicit in genocide. Twice, once last year in June of twenty twenty-five and again on February 28th of this year, the United States and Israel launched unprovoked attacks against Iran. So the idea that Iran is this great destabilizer in the Middle East is a myth that the United States and Israel purvey. The Israelis and the Americans are now doing to deal with this purported Iranian threat, what you see is we've taken measures that have made the situation much worse. In fact, one could argue that we are going to crash the international economy as a result of this war that Israel and the United States started. I would make the argument that we are on the edge of the precipice, in terms of the state of the world economy because of this war. This war shows no, signs of ending anytime soon, and already great damage has been done to the international economy, and more damage will be done the longer the war goes on. So this idea that, number one, Iran is a great threat to the United States is bogus, and number two, the idea that President Trump, and his friends in Israel are making, a safer and more stable Middle East is a ludicrous argument. In fact, what they're doing is they're putting the entire world, on the precipice of a disaster.

🚨 ‼️John Mearsheimer 🚨"FIRED "🚨Donald Trump No signs of quick end to US-Israel war on Iran First of all, this argument that, Iran is a great threat to stability in the Middle East, and a serious threat to the United States is nonsense. The greatest threat to stability in the Middle East is the United States, working closely together, with Israel. Iran has not started a war, in centuries as best I can tell. It's not a highly aggressive country. The country in the Middle East that aggressive is Israel. The country that has, committed genocide in Gaza is not Iran, it's Israel, and we were complicit. We meaning the United States is complicit in genocide. Twice, once last year in June of twenty twenty-five and again on February 28th of this year, the United States and Israel launched unprovoked attacks against Iran. So the idea that Iran is this great destabilizer in the Middle East is a myth that the United States and Israel purvey. The Israelis and the Americans are now doing to deal with this purported Iranian threat, what you see is we've taken measures that have made the situation much worse. In fact, one could argue that we are going to crash the international economy as a result of this war that Israel and the United States started. I would make the argument that we are on the edge of the precipice, in terms of the state of the world economy because of this war. This war shows no, signs of ending anytime soon, and already great damage has been done to the international economy, and more damage will be done the longer the war goes on. So this idea that, number one, Iran is a great threat to the United States is bogus, and number two, the idea that President Trump, and his friends in Israel are making, a safer and more stable Middle East is a ludicrous argument. In fact, what they're doing is they're putting the entire world, on the precipice of a disaster.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

73,659 views • 4 months ago

Breaking: President Trump just said there is no deal with the Islamic Republic. He called the regime liars and "cuckoo." President Trump said that negotiating with them was a waste of time and that the United States will attack Iran tonight. The war is about to resume, as the Islamic Republic is a cancer in this world.

Breaking: President Trump just said there is no deal with the Islamic Republic. He called the regime liars and "cuckoo." President Trump said that negotiating with them was a waste of time and that the United States will attack Iran tonight. The war is about to resume, as the Islamic Republic is a cancer in this world.

Weronika Rogowska

20,027 views • 1 month ago

WATCH: Secretary of State Rubio smacks down reporter for LYING about his statements from yesterday, falsely claiming he said Israel dragged the U.S. into war with Iran.... Reporter: “Yesterday, you told us that Israel was going to strike Iran and that that's why we needed to get involved. Today, the President said that —” Rubio: “No.” Reporter: “— Iran was going to get strike [sic].” Rubio: “Yeah, your statement is false. So, that's not what — I was asked very specifically. Were you there yesterday?” Reporter: “Yes, I asked a question.” Rubio: “Okay. No. Were you the one that — because somebody asked me a question yesterday, did we go in because of Israel? And I said..., no, I told you this had to happen. Anyway, the President made a decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program, that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The President systematically made a decision to systematically destroy this terrorist capability that they had, and we carried that out. I was very clear on that answer. This was a question of timing, of why this had to happen as a joint operation, not the question of the intent. Once the President made a decision that negotiations were not going to work, that they were playing us on the negotiations, and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them. That's what I said yesterday. And you guys need to play it. If you're going to play these statements, you need to play the whole statement, not clip it to reach a narrative that you want to do, all right?”

WATCH: Secretary of State Rubio smacks down reporter for LYING about his statements from yesterday, falsely claiming he said Israel dragged the U.S. into war with Iran.... Reporter: “Yesterday, you told us that Israel was going to strike Iran and that that's why we needed to get involved. Today, the President said that —” Rubio: “No.” Reporter: “— Iran was going to get strike [sic].” Rubio: “Yeah, your statement is false. So, that's not what — I was asked very specifically. Were you there yesterday?” Reporter: “Yes, I asked a question.” Rubio: “Okay. No. Were you the one that — because somebody asked me a question yesterday, did we go in because of Israel? And I said..., no, I told you this had to happen. Anyway, the President made a decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program, that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The President systematically made a decision to systematically destroy this terrorist capability that they had, and we carried that out. I was very clear on that answer. This was a question of timing, of why this had to happen as a joint operation, not the question of the intent. Once the President made a decision that negotiations were not going to work, that they were playing us on the negotiations, and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them. That's what I said yesterday. And you guys need to play it. If you're going to play these statements, you need to play the whole statement, not clip it to reach a narrative that you want to do, all right?”

Curtis Houck

15,505 views • 5 months ago

Netanyahu: They told me: "Don't enter Rafah." Do you know why they said that? Because the President of the United States said he would stop supplying weapons. I said: "I respect him very much. He stood with us at the beginning of the war. But we have no choice. We will enter. And if necessary, we will fight with our fingernails." There are moments when you must know how to say "No" even to the President of the United States.

Netanyahu: They told me: "Don't enter Rafah." Do you know why they said that? Because the President of the United States said he would stop supplying weapons. I said: "I respect him very much. He stood with us at the beginning of the war. But we have no choice. We will enter. And if necessary, we will fight with our fingernails." There are moments when you must know how to say "No" even to the President of the United States.

Clash Report

103,322 views • 1 month ago

‼️ NEW: Zelenskyy is seeking 50 years of security guarantees from the U.S. As of now, the sides have agreed on a 15-year plan. "So, we discussed with the teams, and yesterday we confirmed with the President of the United States that we'll have strong security guarantees from the United States. Indeed, right now this isn't permanent. In the documents, it's for 15 years with the possibility of extending these security guarantees. I raised this issue with the president. I told him that we already have a war going on, and it's been going for almost fifteen years. And therefore, I would very much like the guarantees to be longer. And I told him that we would really like to consider 30, 40, or 50 years. And this would then be President Trump's historic decision. The president said he would think about it," — Zelenskyy said to journalists on Monday, Dec. 29, 2025.

‼️ NEW: Zelenskyy is seeking 50 years of security guarantees from the U.S. As of now, the sides have agreed on a 15-year plan. "So, we discussed with the teams, and yesterday we confirmed with the President of the United States that we'll have strong security guarantees from the United States. Indeed, right now this isn't permanent. In the documents, it's for 15 years with the possibility of extending these security guarantees. I raised this issue with the president. I told him that we already have a war going on, and it's been going for almost fifteen years. And therefore, I would very much like the guarantees to be longer. And I told him that we would really like to consider 30, 40, or 50 years. And this would then be President Trump's historic decision. The president said he would think about it," — Zelenskyy said to journalists on Monday, Dec. 29, 2025.

Kateryna Lisunova

11,649 views • 7 months ago

Bernie Sanders: When I was a kid, the struggle was against the Vietnam War, which killed 59,000 Americans in the war, and more when they came back home sleeping out on the streets of this country. That war was based on a lie. The war in Iraq, which I voted against when I was in Congress, was based on a lie. The war in Iran—"Oh, Iran is going to have a nuclear weapon tomorrow and they're going to attack the United States"—based on a lie.

Bernie Sanders: When I was a kid, the struggle was against the Vietnam War, which killed 59,000 Americans in the war, and more when they came back home sleeping out on the streets of this country. That war was based on a lie. The war in Iraq, which I voted against when I was in Congress, was based on a lie. The war in Iran—"Oh, Iran is going to have a nuclear weapon tomorrow and they're going to attack the United States"—based on a lie.

Clash Report

48,650 views • 1 day ago

Tucker Carlson says the decision for the U.S. to go to war with Iran was not made by the United States itself, but by Israel 🫣 “President Kennedy said no….and that was the last time an American president said no to Israel.”

Tucker Carlson says the decision for the U.S. to go to war with Iran was not made by the United States itself, but by Israel 🫣 “President Kennedy said no….and that was the last time an American president said no to Israel.”

Charging…

309,274 views • 5 months ago

Jeanine Pirro: "Make no mistake, this was an attempted assassination of the president of the United States, with the defendant making clear what his intent was, and that intent was to bring down as many of the high-ranking Cabinet officials as he could… This is the kind of situation that we cannot tolerate."

Jeanine Pirro: "Make no mistake, this was an attempted assassination of the president of the United States, with the defendant making clear what his intent was, and that intent was to bring down as many of the high-ranking Cabinet officials as he could… This is the kind of situation that we cannot tolerate."

Breaking911

22,897 views • 3 months ago