正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

BASH: Let's start with the big question -- will you refund the roughly $134 billion taken by these tariffs? BESSENT: That's not the big question. That's bad framing BASH: Refunds are clearly gonna be up to you BESSENT: No no no no, Dana. It's not up to me or... show more

Aaron Rupar

1,108,180 subscribers

602,848 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Bash: "I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” Bessent: "Well, that's not the big question…When you say it's a big question, that's bad framing because the Supreme Court didn't address that.”

Bash: "I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” Bessent: "Well, that's not the big question…When you say it's a big question, that's bad framing because the Supreme Court didn't address that.”

The Bulwark

77,249 次观看 • 4 个月前

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.

Overton

245,862 次观看 • 4 个月前

Dana Bash pushes Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on what happens to the $134 billion in tariff revenue already collected:

Dana Bash pushes Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on what happens to the $134 billion in tariff revenue already collected:

State of the Union

12,578 次观看 • 4 个月前

WELKER: Inflation has gone up. It's at 3% now up from 2% in April when the tariffs were imposed-- BESSENT: No, no no no. So, inflation hasn't gone up. The one thing we're not gonna do is do what the Biden administration did and tell the American people they don't know how they feel

WELKER: Inflation has gone up. It's at 3% now up from 2% in April when the tariffs were imposed-- BESSENT: No, no no no. So, inflation hasn't gone up. The one thing we're not gonna do is do what the Biden administration did and tell the American people they don't know how they feel

Aaron Rupar

1,165,314 次观看 • 7 个月前

"We're on your side!" No, you're not. That's not up to you. It's up to them.

"We're on your side!" No, you're not. That's not up to you. It's up to them.

hoe_math = PsychoMath

435,874 次观看 • 8 个月前

Bash: “As the treasury secretary, it's hard to believe that you don't have an opinion or know where these revenues, over $100 billion, are going to go, or have an opinion on where they should go." Bessent: "I had an opinion, and the court did not agree with my opinion."

Bash: “As the treasury secretary, it's hard to believe that you don't have an opinion or know where these revenues, over $100 billion, are going to go, or have an opinion on where they should go." Bessent: "I had an opinion, and the court did not agree with my opinion."

The Bulwark

52,681 次观看 • 4 个月前

BASH: “The president has a reputation, a self-described dealmaker, so why haven't we seen the kind of deals that he promised in the last 90 days?” BESSENT: "Again, he didn't promise this. And when we send out the 100 letters to these countries, that will set their tariff rate. So we're going to have 100 done in the next few days.” BASH: “But that's not a deal. That's a threat.” BESSENT: “No, that's the level. That's the deal.”

BASH: “The president has a reputation, a self-described dealmaker, so why haven't we seen the kind of deals that he promised in the last 90 days?” BESSENT: "Again, he didn't promise this. And when we send out the 100 letters to these countries, that will set their tariff rate. So we're going to have 100 done in the next few days.” BASH: “But that's not a deal. That's a threat.” BESSENT: “No, that's the level. That's the deal.”

State of the Union

67,559 次观看 • 1 年前

Meet the Press, September 7, 2025: BESSENT: So we would have to give a refund on about half the tariffs... . WELKER: And you're prepared to give those... refunds? BESSENT: "Well, I mean, there's no be prepared. If the court says it, we'd have to do it."

Meet the Press, September 7, 2025: BESSENT: So we would have to give a refund on about half the tariffs... . WELKER: And you're prepared to give those... refunds? BESSENT: "Well, I mean, there's no be prepared. If the court says it, we'd have to do it."

Scott Lincicome

34,727 次观看 • 4 个月前

Trump is FED UP with ABC Reporter: "You know, it's not the question that I mind. It's your attitude. The way you ask a question with the anger and the meanness is terrible. You ought to go back and learn how to be a reporter. No more questions from you."🔥

Trump is FED UP with ABC Reporter: "You know, it's not the question that I mind. It's your attitude. The way you ask a question with the anger and the meanness is terrible. You ought to go back and learn how to be a reporter. No more questions from you."🔥

TheBlaze

45,216 次观看 • 7 个月前

Rep. Beatty to Bessent after he refuses to answer a question about affordable housing: "No no. We're not gonna to do that with me. You get to hear my wrath that you refuse to answer a question under your authority, and yet you've talked about the value of housing and you're not releasing the funds."

Rep. Beatty to Bessent after he refuses to answer a question about affordable housing: "No no. We're not gonna to do that with me. You get to hear my wrath that you refuse to answer a question under your authority, and yet you've talked about the value of housing and you're not releasing the funds."

Aaron Rupar

127,683 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just rhetorically bodied a Democrat congresswoman who understands NOTHING about dealmaking & foreign policy. Clown show. VELAZQUEZ (D-NY): "Specifically, which countries are you close to striking deal with?" BESSENT: "I'm sorry, Congresswoman, but that would not benefit the United States." VELAZQUEZ: "No, no, no. I'm asking you a question based on the statement that you made on CNBC." BESSENT: "And I am telling you that it would be detrimental to the interest of the United States for me to answer that question." VELAZQUEZ: "Why would that be detrimental?" BESSENT: "Because as the negotiations may still be in process as we speak, as we are not at the end of the week yet, I am sure that you, through your question, would not want to compromise U.S. negotiations." VELAZQUEZ: "Reclaiming my time." BESSENT: "Would you?" VELAZQUEZ: "Why would you not answer my question? And that would be considered detrimental to the American people, to the American economy. I do not understand." BESSENT: "Congresswoman, I'm happy to say there are negotiations going on. I'm not going to reveal the details."

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just rhetorically bodied a Democrat congresswoman who understands NOTHING about dealmaking & foreign policy. Clown show. VELAZQUEZ (D-NY): "Specifically, which countries are you close to striking deal with?" BESSENT: "I'm sorry, Congresswoman, but that would not benefit the United States." VELAZQUEZ: "No, no, no. I'm asking you a question based on the statement that you made on CNBC." BESSENT: "And I am telling you that it would be detrimental to the interest of the United States for me to answer that question." VELAZQUEZ: "Why would that be detrimental?" BESSENT: "Because as the negotiations may still be in process as we speak, as we are not at the end of the week yet, I am sure that you, through your question, would not want to compromise U.S. negotiations." VELAZQUEZ: "Reclaiming my time." BESSENT: "Would you?" VELAZQUEZ: "Why would you not answer my question? And that would be considered detrimental to the American people, to the American economy. I do not understand." BESSENT: "Congresswoman, I'm happy to say there are negotiations going on. I'm not going to reveal the details."

Eric Daugherty

1,428,739 次观看 • 1 年前

No judge is going to tell the executive branch how to conduct foreign policy because that's not up to them. It's up to the executive branch.

No judge is going to tell the executive branch how to conduct foreign policy because that's not up to them. It's up to the executive branch.

Department of State

411,379 次观看 • 4 个月前

Bash: "What the Supreme Court said is that it is not the executive's function to do these tariffs. It needs to go through Congress, and that is what the Constitution says." Bessent: "That is not correct."

Bash: "What the Supreme Court said is that it is not the executive's function to do these tariffs. It needs to go through Congress, and that is what the Constitution says." Bessent: "That is not correct."

The Bulwark

119,366 次观看 • 4 个月前

QUESTION: If prices are down and not up because of tariffs — why is Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent saying they’re going to lower tariffs on coffee, bananas, etc to lower prices? 🤔 ANSWER: Because they are lying. Tariffs are a tax on you, and prices are UP.

QUESTION: If prices are down and not up because of tariffs — why is Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent saying they’re going to lower tariffs on coffee, bananas, etc to lower prices? 🤔 ANSWER: Because they are lying. Tariffs are a tax on you, and prices are UP.

The Tennessee Holler

149,684 次观看 • 7 个月前

CNN: That's not exactly a no, Stephen. Can you just unequivocally say that the immigration policy is not designed to profile people? STEPHEN MILLER: No, and it's a dumb question

Aaron Rupar

163,175 次观看 • 9 个月前

Sewell: "Will all Americans have a net benefit from this Big, Beautiful Bill?" Bessent: "It's difficult." Sewell: "Yes or no?" Bessent: "It's ridiculous for me to answer for 337 million." Sewell: "If you're only giving me $268 and taking away my healthcare...that's not fair."

Sewell: "Will all Americans have a net benefit from this Big, Beautiful Bill?" Bessent: "It's difficult." Sewell: "Yes or no?" Bessent: "It's ridiculous for me to answer for 337 million." Sewell: "If you're only giving me $268 and taking away my healthcare...that's not fair."

The Bulwark

972,870 次观看 • 1 年前

PETERS: Will you commit to leaving a citizenship question off the census questionnaire? LUTNICK: It's a longer answer. It's not a yes or no.

PETERS: Will you commit to leaving a citizenship question off the census questionnaire? LUTNICK: It's a longer answer. It's not a yes or no.

Aaron Rupar

34,732 次观看 • 4 个月前

Warren: This should be an easy one. Can you commit that Trump's Fed nominee, Kevin Warsh, will not be sued or investigated by the DOJ if he does not cut interest rates in the way Trump wants? Bessent: That's up to the president

Warren: This should be an easy one. Can you commit that Trump's Fed nominee, Kevin Warsh, will not be sued or investigated by the DOJ if he does not cut interest rates in the way Trump wants? Bessent: That's up to the president

unusual_whales

177,950 次观看 • 5 个月前

Welker: "Prices are going up." Bessent: "No, no…Inflation hasn't gone up. And the one thing that we're not gonna do is do what the Biden administration did and tell the American people they don't know how they feel. They are traumatized."

Welker: "Prices are going up." Bessent: "No, no…Inflation hasn't gone up. And the one thing that we're not gonna do is do what the Biden administration did and tell the American people they don't know how they feel. They are traumatized."

The Bulwark

80,526 次观看 • 7 个月前

Karl: The [Big Beautiful Bill] is adding a lot to the national debt. Speaker Johnson: No it's not. No. No it's not... We're gonna reduce the deficit. (The BBB adds $3T to the deficit)

Karl: The [Big Beautiful Bill] is adding a lot to the national debt. Speaker Johnson: No it's not. No. No it's not... We're gonna reduce the deficit. (The BBB adds $3T to the deficit)

Ron Smith

77,215 次观看 • 1 年前