Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

BASH: Let's start with the big question -- will you refund the roughly $134 billion taken by these tariffs? BESSENT: That's not the big question. That's bad framing BASH: Refunds are clearly gonna be up to you BESSENT: No no no no, Dana. It's not up to me or... show more

Aaron Rupar

1,125,995 subscribers

602,946 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Bash: "I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” Bessent: "Well, that's not the big question…When you say it's a big question, that's bad framing because the Supreme Court didn't address that.”

Bash: "I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” Bessent: "Well, that's not the big question…When you say it's a big question, that's bad framing because the Supreme Court didn't address that.”

The Bulwark

77,249 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.

Overton

245,862 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

WELKER: Inflation has gone up. It's at 3% now up from 2% in April when the tariffs were imposed-- BESSENT: No, no no no. So, inflation hasn't gone up. The one thing we're not gonna do is do what the Biden administration did and tell the American people they don't know how they feel

WELKER: Inflation has gone up. It's at 3% now up from 2% in April when the tariffs were imposed-- BESSENT: No, no no no. So, inflation hasn't gone up. The one thing we're not gonna do is do what the Biden administration did and tell the American people they don't know how they feel

Aaron Rupar

1,165,352 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Bash: “As the treasury secretary, it's hard to believe that you don't have an opinion or know where these revenues, over $100 billion, are going to go, or have an opinion on where they should go." Bessent: "I had an opinion, and the court did not agree with my opinion."

Bash: “As the treasury secretary, it's hard to believe that you don't have an opinion or know where these revenues, over $100 billion, are going to go, or have an opinion on where they should go." Bessent: "I had an opinion, and the court did not agree with my opinion."

The Bulwark

52,681 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

"We're on your side!" No, you're not. That's not up to you. It's up to them.

"We're on your side!" No, you're not. That's not up to you. It's up to them.

hoe_math = PsychoMath

435,916 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Meet the Press, September 7, 2025: BESSENT: So we would have to give a refund on about half the tariffs... . WELKER: And you're prepared to give those... refunds? BESSENT: "Well, I mean, there's no be prepared. If the court says it, we'd have to do it."

Meet the Press, September 7, 2025: BESSENT: So we would have to give a refund on about half the tariffs... . WELKER: And you're prepared to give those... refunds? BESSENT: "Well, I mean, there's no be prepared. If the court says it, we'd have to do it."

Scott Lincicome

34,727 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Rep. Beatty to Bessent after he refuses to answer a question about affordable housing: "No no. We're not gonna to do that with me. You get to hear my wrath that you refuse to answer a question under your authority, and yet you've talked about the value of housing and you're not releasing the funds."

Rep. Beatty to Bessent after he refuses to answer a question about affordable housing: "No no. We're not gonna to do that with me. You get to hear my wrath that you refuse to answer a question under your authority, and yet you've talked about the value of housing and you're not releasing the funds."

Aaron Rupar

127,683 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just rhetorically bodied a Democrat congresswoman who understands NOTHING about dealmaking & foreign policy. Clown show. VELAZQUEZ (D-NY): "Specifically, which countries are you close to striking deal with?" BESSENT: "I'm sorry, Congresswoman, but that would not benefit the United States." VELAZQUEZ: "No, no, no. I'm asking you a question based on the statement that you made on CNBC." BESSENT: "And I am telling you that it would be detrimental to the interest of the United States for me to answer that question." VELAZQUEZ: "Why would that be detrimental?" BESSENT: "Because as the negotiations may still be in process as we speak, as we are not at the end of the week yet, I am sure that you, through your question, would not want to compromise U.S. negotiations." VELAZQUEZ: "Reclaiming my time." BESSENT: "Would you?" VELAZQUEZ: "Why would you not answer my question? And that would be considered detrimental to the American people, to the American economy. I do not understand." BESSENT: "Congresswoman, I'm happy to say there are negotiations going on. I'm not going to reveal the details."

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just rhetorically bodied a Democrat congresswoman who understands NOTHING about dealmaking & foreign policy. Clown show. VELAZQUEZ (D-NY): "Specifically, which countries are you close to striking deal with?" BESSENT: "I'm sorry, Congresswoman, but that would not benefit the United States." VELAZQUEZ: "No, no, no. I'm asking you a question based on the statement that you made on CNBC." BESSENT: "And I am telling you that it would be detrimental to the interest of the United States for me to answer that question." VELAZQUEZ: "Why would that be detrimental?" BESSENT: "Because as the negotiations may still be in process as we speak, as we are not at the end of the week yet, I am sure that you, through your question, would not want to compromise U.S. negotiations." VELAZQUEZ: "Reclaiming my time." BESSENT: "Would you?" VELAZQUEZ: "Why would you not answer my question? And that would be considered detrimental to the American people, to the American economy. I do not understand." BESSENT: "Congresswoman, I'm happy to say there are negotiations going on. I'm not going to reveal the details."

QUANTUM GUARD ™️

157,862 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

No judge is going to tell the executive branch how to conduct foreign policy because that's not up to them. It's up to the executive branch.

No judge is going to tell the executive branch how to conduct foreign policy because that's not up to them. It's up to the executive branch.

Department of State

411,485 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Bash: "What the Supreme Court said is that it is not the executive's function to do these tariffs. It needs to go through Congress, and that is what the Constitution says." Bessent: "That is not correct."

Bash: "What the Supreme Court said is that it is not the executive's function to do these tariffs. It needs to go through Congress, and that is what the Constitution says." Bessent: "That is not correct."

The Bulwark

119,382 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

QUESTION: If prices are down and not up because of tariffs — why is Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent saying they’re going to lower tariffs on coffee, bananas, etc to lower prices? 🤔 ANSWER: Because they are lying. Tariffs are a tax on you, and prices are UP.

QUESTION: If prices are down and not up because of tariffs — why is Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent saying they’re going to lower tariffs on coffee, bananas, etc to lower prices? 🤔 ANSWER: Because they are lying. Tariffs are a tax on you, and prices are UP.

The Tennessee Holler

149,687 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

PETERS: Will you commit to leaving a citizenship question off the census questionnaire? LUTNICK: It's a longer answer. It's not a yes or no.

PETERS: Will you commit to leaving a citizenship question off the census questionnaire? LUTNICK: It's a longer answer. It's not a yes or no.

Aaron Rupar

34,732 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Warren: This should be an easy one. Can you commit that Trump's Fed nominee, Kevin Warsh, will not be sued or investigated by the DOJ if he does not cut interest rates in the way Trump wants? Bessent: That's up to the president

Warren: This should be an easy one. Can you commit that Trump's Fed nominee, Kevin Warsh, will not be sued or investigated by the DOJ if he does not cut interest rates in the way Trump wants? Bessent: That's up to the president

unusual_whales

177,950 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Welker: "Prices are going up." Bessent: "No, no…Inflation hasn't gone up. And the one thing that we're not gonna do is do what the Biden administration did and tell the American people they don't know how they feel. They are traumatized."

Welker: "Prices are going up." Bessent: "No, no…Inflation hasn't gone up. And the one thing that we're not gonna do is do what the Biden administration did and tell the American people they don't know how they feel. They are traumatized."

The Bulwark

80,551 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

BASH: How much is it gonna cost to fix? And are you gonna use the same company you did in the no bid contract, or will you open it up to new bids? BURGUM: We'll use the same company, because they did a fantastic job

BASH: How much is it gonna cost to fix? And are you gonna use the same company you did in the no bid contract, or will you open it up to new bids? BURGUM: We'll use the same company, because they did a fantastic job

Aaron Rupar

168,867 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten