Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Battlefields don’t read tweets, they leave records. The pattern is quite consistent: 1971 — Bangladesh lost, lost half the country 1999 — Kargil didn't work 2025 — Waiting for the “director’s cut.” But the official formula remains unchanged: No losses… only “strategic achievements.” 😄 Aamazing consistency. 👏 The battlefield... show more

News Algebra

809,016 subscribers

192,435 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

“How much have you ever lost on a coin toss?” in No Country for Old Men (2007) is tension stripped down to almost nothing but conversation. Javier Bardem barely changes his tone the entire scene, which somehow makes Anton Chigurh even more terrifying.

“How much have you ever lost on a coin toss?” in No Country for Old Men (2007) is tension stripped down to almost nothing but conversation. Javier Bardem barely changes his tone the entire scene, which somehow makes Anton Chigurh even more terrifying.

cinesthetic.

33,922 views • 5 months ago

"If the uranium remains in Iran... we mowed the lawn, maybe a very big lawn, but we’ll have to prepare for the next round." Channel 14 Political Commentator Jacob Bardugo (יעקב ברדוגו) warns that despite "amazing achievements" on the battlefield, Israel’s existential threat remains unchanged as long as Iran retains its nuclear capabilities. Bardugo points out that Iranians often hold a "huge advantage" in the negotiating room, possessing a superior ability to maximize their political capabilities. The ultimate success of the Trump Doctrine will be judged by the final result: if the uranium is not completely removed, the current victories are only temporary setbacks for a regime that will inevitably return for another round.

"If the uranium remains in Iran... we mowed the lawn, maybe a very big lawn, but we’ll have to prepare for the next round." Channel 14 Political Commentator Jacob Bardugo (יעקב ברדוגו) warns that despite "amazing achievements" on the battlefield, Israel’s existential threat remains unchanged as long as Iran retains its nuclear capabilities. Bardugo points out that Iranians often hold a "huge advantage" in the negotiating room, possessing a superior ability to maximize their political capabilities. The ultimate success of the Trump Doctrine will be judged by the final result: if the uranium is not completely removed, the current victories are only temporary setbacks for a regime that will inevitably return for another round.

C14 News Israel | EN

12,871 views • 6 months ago

This is the reality as of today, Mr. Kejriwal and Harjot Bains Ji. You asked for three to four weeks, and almost four weeks have passed. ₹5 lakh was announced immediately by Bains ji, but on the ground there has been zero progress. No funds have reached the school, no official has approached us, and the condition of the school remains exactly the same. Mr. Kejriwal, you were quick to post a video mentioning my name and claiming the work had been sanctioned. Now I ask you the same question: if the work was truly sanctioned, why has nothing changed? This is exactly what the AAP government is doing of making announcements and advertisements, while the reality on the ground remains unchanged. I expect a clear answer. If there is still no action, I will have no option but to protest until the promised work is actually carried out. No matter what! Arvind Kejriwal Harjot Singh Bains

This is the reality as of today, Mr. Kejriwal and Harjot Bains Ji. You asked for three to four weeks, and almost four weeks have passed. ₹5 lakh was announced immediately by Bains ji, but on the ground there has been zero progress. No funds have reached the school, no official has approached us, and the condition of the school remains exactly the same. Mr. Kejriwal, you were quick to post a video mentioning my name and claiming the work had been sanctioned. Now I ask you the same question: if the work was truly sanctioned, why has nothing changed? This is exactly what the AAP government is doing of making announcements and advertisements, while the reality on the ground remains unchanged. I expect a clear answer. If there is still no action, I will have no option but to protest until the promised work is actually carried out. No matter what! Arvind Kejriwal Harjot Singh Bains

Rattan Dhillon

31,420 views • 1 month ago

“We don’t want man-made laws, only Allah’s law.” “Democracy is a cobbler’s ideology.” “No place for secularism, no place for ‘Indian agents’.” These slogans were raised after Osman Hadi’s funeral—clear signals of what some envision for Bangladesh’s future. But in 1971, 3 million lives were lost and 200,000 women were violated for a secular Bangladesh—a nation of equal rights for Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists, Christians, and Indigenous people. Is this why Yunus wants to erase 1971—because a plural, secular Bangladesh stands in the way of turning the country into an Islamic state?

“We don’t want man-made laws, only Allah’s law.” “Democracy is a cobbler’s ideology.” “No place for secularism, no place for ‘Indian agents’.” These slogans were raised after Osman Hadi’s funeral—clear signals of what some envision for Bangladesh’s future. But in 1971, 3 million lives were lost and 200,000 women were violated for a secular Bangladesh—a nation of equal rights for Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists, Christians, and Indigenous people. Is this why Yunus wants to erase 1971—because a plural, secular Bangladesh stands in the way of turning the country into an Islamic state?

Sahidul Hasan Khokon

80,681 views • 9 months ago

Economic sanctions are often framed as a peaceful alternative to war, but history tells a different story. From Iran to Iraq, Syria, Libya, Cuba, and Venezuela, sanctions have functioned as a weapon designed to bypass armies and punish entire populations. This episode of Demystifying Iran traces a consistent US playbook: embargoes justified in the name of security, disarmament, or human rights, yet producing mass poverty, social collapse, and devastating civilian death tolls. From the half-million Iraqi children lost under sanctions in the 1990s to the ongoing economic siege on Iran, the pattern remains unchanged. Watch the full episode: Seyed Mohammad Marandi #DemystifyingIran #Iran #Economy #Politics #Sanctions #AlMayadeen

Economic sanctions are often framed as a peaceful alternative to war, but history tells a different story. From Iran to Iraq, Syria, Libya, Cuba, and Venezuela, sanctions have functioned as a weapon designed to bypass armies and punish entire populations. This episode of Demystifying Iran traces a consistent US playbook: embargoes justified in the name of security, disarmament, or human rights, yet producing mass poverty, social collapse, and devastating civilian death tolls. From the half-million Iraqi children lost under sanctions in the 1990s to the ongoing economic siege on Iran, the pattern remains unchanged. Watch the full episode: Seyed Mohammad Marandi #DemystifyingIran #Iran #Economy #Politics #Sanctions #AlMayadeen

Al Mayadeen English

28,811 views • 8 months ago

One of the most underrated deleted scenes in Deathly Hallows Part 1 is Harry’s final goodbye with Petunia Dursley. For years, Petunia treated Harry as a reminder of the sister she lost. But as the Dursleys prepare to leave, she quietly tells him: “You didn’t just lose a mother that night in Godric’s Hollow. I lost a sister.” It’s a brief moment, but it completely changes how you see her. Beneath all the bitterness was someone who spent decades carrying grief, jealousy, and regret she never knew how to express. Do you think this should have stayed in the final cut?

One of the most underrated deleted scenes in Deathly Hallows Part 1 is Harry’s final goodbye with Petunia Dursley. For years, Petunia treated Harry as a reminder of the sister she lost. But as the Dursleys prepare to leave, she quietly tells him: “You didn’t just lose a mother that night in Godric’s Hollow. I lost a sister.” It’s a brief moment, but it completely changes how you see her. Beneath all the bitterness was someone who spent decades carrying grief, jealousy, and regret she never knew how to express. Do you think this should have stayed in the final cut?

PotterWorldwide

28,537 views • 4 months ago

86,000 jobs lost. Fastest-shrinking economy in the G7. And now the PM’s sending a trillion dollars to boost the U.S. economy. He promised to deliver in a crisis but so far, only concessions. No deal. This is their response? Hope they sent someone better than these guys to read talking points for 🇨🇦

86,000 jobs lost. Fastest-shrinking economy in the G7. And now the PM’s sending a trillion dollars to boost the U.S. economy. He promised to deliver in a crisis but so far, only concessions. No deal. This is their response? Hope they sent someone better than these guys to read talking points for 🇨🇦

Melissa Lantsman

34,277 views • 1 year ago

Roger Federer dropped some real wisdom in his Dartmouth commencement speech: He won nearly 80% of his 1,526 professional matches, but only 54% of the points he played. Even one of the greatest tennis players of all time lost almost half his points. His lesson: Don’t dwell on every mistake. A double fault, a lost point, even a bad day, it’s just one point. The champions move on quickly with the same focus and fire for the next one. This is one of the best mindset lessons I’ve heard in a long time. It applies way beyond tennis. Life is full of losses and setbacks. The difference between average and exceptional is how quickly you reset and keep playing.

Roger Federer dropped some real wisdom in his Dartmouth commencement speech: He won nearly 80% of his 1,526 professional matches, but only 54% of the points he played. Even one of the greatest tennis players of all time lost almost half his points. His lesson: Don’t dwell on every mistake. A double fault, a lost point, even a bad day, it’s just one point. The champions move on quickly with the same focus and fire for the next one. This is one of the best mindset lessons I’ve heard in a long time. It applies way beyond tennis. Life is full of losses and setbacks. The difference between average and exceptional is how quickly you reset and keep playing.

Camus

286,166 views • 4 months ago

The map of Syria is changing, but the script remains the same. For a decade, the mainstream media championed the SDF as the "anti-ISIS hero," but masked a brutal geopolitical trap. Today, that mask is off. Washington didn't just walk away; they facilitated the transition of the SDF’s territories, oil fields, and even ISIS prisons to the new regime under former al-Qaeda emir, Abu Mohammad al-Julani. From "indispensable partner" to "expired proxy" in the blink of an eye. The Kurdish leadership is learning the hardest lesson in geopolitics: when you let an empire write your strategy, you are only as valuable as the next deal. Watch the full breakdown of how the SDF was left exposed.

The map of Syria is changing, but the script remains the same. For a decade, the mainstream media championed the SDF as the "anti-ISIS hero," but masked a brutal geopolitical trap. Today, that mask is off. Washington didn't just walk away; they facilitated the transition of the SDF’s territories, oil fields, and even ISIS prisons to the new regime under former al-Qaeda emir, Abu Mohammad al-Julani. From "indispensable partner" to "expired proxy" in the blink of an eye. The Kurdish leadership is learning the hardest lesson in geopolitics: when you let an empire write your strategy, you are only as valuable as the next deal. Watch the full breakdown of how the SDF was left exposed.

Kevork Almassian

36,660 views • 8 months ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇨🇳 The Iran conflict may have just accelerated the world Washington feared most. Brandon Weichert argues the war has been a strategic disaster for the U.S., with no clear path to victory and only one possible upside: forcing America to finally leave the Middle East militarily and focus on its own hemisphere. “At every level, this conflict with Iran in the Middle East has been a strategic disaster for the U.S. There is no win here.” He warns the real winner is China, because the crisis is helping birth a post-American, multipolar world where the U.S. remains powerful but no longer sits alone at the top. He frames the future as China-oriented, not necessarily China-run: a global order where countries orbit Beijing’s economic and political gravity without China having to become the world’s policeman. The U.S. burned power trying to manage the Middle East. China may inherit the influence without firing a shot. Brandon Weichert

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇨🇳 The Iran conflict may have just accelerated the world Washington feared most. Brandon Weichert argues the war has been a strategic disaster for the U.S., with no clear path to victory and only one possible upside: forcing America to finally leave the Middle East militarily and focus on its own hemisphere. “At every level, this conflict with Iran in the Middle East has been a strategic disaster for the U.S. There is no win here.” He warns the real winner is China, because the crisis is helping birth a post-American, multipolar world where the U.S. remains powerful but no longer sits alone at the top. He frames the future as China-oriented, not necessarily China-run: a global order where countries orbit Beijing’s economic and political gravity without China having to become the world’s policeman. The U.S. burned power trying to manage the Middle East. China may inherit the influence without firing a shot. Brandon Weichert

Mario Nawfal

73,341 views • 3 months ago

Proof The Quran is the word of God Stylometric Analysis of the Qur’an: Proof of Divine Authorship Modern stylometry, a scientific method that analyzes writing style using mathematics and linguistics, has been applied to the Qur’an. The results? Unlike human-authored texts, the Qur’an shows a consistent style across all chapters, proving it could only come from one source. This consistency across 114 surahs over 23 years of revelation is a miracle itself. No matter the context, place, or situation, the Qur’an’s style remains unique, balanced, and unmatched. Linguists and data scientists confirm what Muslims have always believed: the Qur’an is not authored by multiple humans, but revealed by Allah(God) ﷻ. Key Point: Stylometric analysis supports what the Qur’an says about itself, that it is the unchanged, divine word of Allah.

Proof The Quran is the word of God Stylometric Analysis of the Qur’an: Proof of Divine Authorship Modern stylometry, a scientific method that analyzes writing style using mathematics and linguistics, has been applied to the Qur’an. The results? Unlike human-authored texts, the Qur’an shows a consistent style across all chapters, proving it could only come from one source. This consistency across 114 surahs over 23 years of revelation is a miracle itself. No matter the context, place, or situation, the Qur’an’s style remains unique, balanced, and unmatched. Linguists and data scientists confirm what Muslims have always believed: the Qur’an is not authored by multiple humans, but revealed by Allah(God) ﷻ. Key Point: Stylometric analysis supports what the Qur’an says about itself, that it is the unchanged, divine word of Allah.

Eddie Deen

23,489 views • 11 months ago

President Isaias once remarked that for Ethiopia's leadership to be seen as champions within their own country, they have repeatedly backstabbed Eritrea to advance their own agendas. This pattern was true yesterday, remains true today, and will continue to be true until a responsible and accountable leadership emerges in the future. The cost of their ambitions is measured not in political gains but in the lives lost in every conflict they ignite. We don't have to look far—the recent war in Tigray devastated thousands, yet the suffering was largely ignored by those who instigated it. The tragedy lies not just in the destruction but in the indifference toward the countless lives sacrificed for a cause few genuinely care about. In the end, they boast about their large population as if numbers alone can determine victory in battle. It's truly sad when lives are reduced to mere statistics in a game of power.

President Isaias once remarked that for Ethiopia's leadership to be seen as champions within their own country, they have repeatedly backstabbed Eritrea to advance their own agendas. This pattern was true yesterday, remains true today, and will continue to be true until a responsible and accountable leadership emerges in the future. The cost of their ambitions is measured not in political gains but in the lives lost in every conflict they ignite. We don't have to look far—the recent war in Tigray devastated thousands, yet the suffering was largely ignored by those who instigated it. The tragedy lies not just in the destruction but in the indifference toward the countless lives sacrificed for a cause few genuinely care about. In the end, they boast about their large population as if numbers alone can determine victory in battle. It's truly sad when lives are reduced to mere statistics in a game of power.

#EritreaShinesAt35 👩🏿‍🔧 🇪🇷🇪🇷

10,638 views • 2 years ago

🇨🇦🤡 : Does this sound like someone who cares at all that Canada lost over 100K jobs in the last two months, while he is intentionally packing in hundreds of thousands of temporary foreign workers? Mark Carney says Liberals didn't take the Summer off. They shut down the House of Commons for all but 4 weeks, of the first 8.5 months of 2025. He then explains we are in a crisis & starts cracking jokes.

🇨🇦🤡 : Does this sound like someone who cares at all that Canada lost over 100K jobs in the last two months, while he is intentionally packing in hundreds of thousands of temporary foreign workers? Mark Carney says Liberals didn't take the Summer off. They shut down the House of Commons for all but 4 weeks, of the first 8.5 months of 2025. He then explains we are in a crisis & starts cracking jokes.

Bruce McGonigal

201,798 views • 1 year ago

🇺🇸 ANDREW TATE: “THE WEST HAS LOST ITS SOUL” Andrew Tate: “For there to be free speech, there can't be limits on speech. But there must be... parameters of objective reality. At a certain point, free speech just becomes inciting for violence... because these people do not have respect for life, or for a different opinion. We've lost control of a large percentage of the Western population who live in a fantasy land... and in their fantasy land, they think people deserve bullets in the neck. They will make jokes about Charlie Kirk’s death, and they don’t care. These people are soulless. The West has lost its soul. There is no honor left. Not even the basic masculine dignity of showing respect to a fallen enemy. I want to get on the rocket and go to Mars... I’m heartbroken for the Western world as we know it.”

🇺🇸 ANDREW TATE: “THE WEST HAS LOST ITS SOUL” Andrew Tate: “For there to be free speech, there can't be limits on speech. But there must be... parameters of objective reality. At a certain point, free speech just becomes inciting for violence... because these people do not have respect for life, or for a different opinion. We've lost control of a large percentage of the Western population who live in a fantasy land... and in their fantasy land, they think people deserve bullets in the neck. They will make jokes about Charlie Kirk’s death, and they don’t care. These people are soulless. The West has lost its soul. There is no honor left. Not even the basic masculine dignity of showing respect to a fallen enemy. I want to get on the rocket and go to Mars... I’m heartbroken for the Western world as we know it.”

Mario Nawfal

107,488 views • 1 year ago

🤼‍♂️ Let me get this straight. The SOTE (Salt of the Earth); pushed by a billionaire’s broadcast machine; can barely draw 600,000 viewers per week on a good week, yet he tries to drag THE MAN, THE MYTH, THE LEGEND… The Big Valbowski, Val Venis? SOTE is out here attempting to drag a man who was performing week in and week out in front of 5 to 8 million viewers on Monday Night Raw during the greatest era in wrestling history, the Attitude Era; while also tearing it up on multiple house shows across the country, night after night for YEARS. The midget Hebrew who lost to the commie CM Punk is trying to drag the MAN who not only put CM Punk on the map but remains UNDEFEATED against him. STOP! When you grow up and break a million viewers consistently like the legends of the Attitude Era, then I might take notice. Until then… keep my name out your mouth, kid.

🤼‍♂️ Let me get this straight. The SOTE (Salt of the Earth); pushed by a billionaire’s broadcast machine; can barely draw 600,000 viewers per week on a good week, yet he tries to drag THE MAN, THE MYTH, THE LEGEND… The Big Valbowski, Val Venis? SOTE is out here attempting to drag a man who was performing week in and week out in front of 5 to 8 million viewers on Monday Night Raw during the greatest era in wrestling history, the Attitude Era; while also tearing it up on multiple house shows across the country, night after night for YEARS. The midget Hebrew who lost to the commie CM Punk is trying to drag the MAN who not only put CM Punk on the map but remains UNDEFEATED against him. STOP! When you grow up and break a million viewers consistently like the legends of the Attitude Era, then I might take notice. Until then… keep my name out your mouth, kid.

Val Venis™ (The Big Valbowski™)

47,549 views • 5 months ago

The Knife in 12 Angry Men: When the Greatest Obstacle to Truth Is No Longer the Evidence. Many people remember the knife scene in 12 Angry Men (1957) as the turning point of the trial. But what Sidney Lumet truly changes is not the evidence itself. He changes the state of mind of the people looking at it. The scene does not prove the defendant's innocence, nor does it dismantle the prosecution's entire case. Instead, it reveals that the greatest barrier to truth is no longer a lack of facts, but the jurors' attachment to the conclusions they have already reached. That is the scene's deepest cinematic achievement. From the very beginning, Lumet creates an atmosphere of certainty. The jurors are no longer genuinely investigating the case. They are reinforcing what they already believe. They do not examine the evidence to understand what happened; they examine it to confirm a verdict they have already accepted. The film never explains this through speeches or exposition. It emerges naturally through the impatient rhythm of the dialogue, the eagerness to end deliberations, and the unspoken assumption that the outcome has already been decided. Once a conclusion no longer feels worth questioning, perception itself begins to close. That is why the knife appears with such remarkable restraint. Lumet never presents it as a dramatic revelation. There is no swelling score announcing a breakthrough, no rapid editing designed to shock the audience. Juror No. 8 simply places an identical knife on the table. The gesture introduces no new truth. It merely dissolves something everyone had assumed was beyond question. The real change does not happen on the tabletop. It happens in the minds of the people gathered around it. This is also why the camera lingers far longer on faces than on the knife itself. Lumet understands that the evidence is not the true subject of the scene. The real subject is the moment when perception begins to shift. Hesitant glances, prolonged silences, and subtle expressions of uncertainty appear not because the jurors have discovered the truth, but because they have lost the certainty that they already possessed it. The film is not recording a victory in debate. It is capturing an inner transformation. What makes the sequence especially remarkable is that almost none of the evidence changes afterward. The witnesses remain the same. The crime scene remains the same. The case itself remains the same. What changes is the way the jurors look at everything they already have before them. Once certainty begins to crack, details that had been present all along suddenly become worthy of genuine scrutiny. Lumet does not add new truth to the story. He removes what has been preventing the characters from seeing it. Perhaps that is why the knife scene continues to resonate nearly seventy years later. It speaks to something far larger than a courtroom. In life, what keeps us from seeing reality clearly is often not the absence of evidence, but our attachment to conclusions we have already embraced. Once we become invested in being right, new evidence is easily absorbed into the beliefs we already hold. Only when that attachment begins to loosen can perception truly open again. The world does not change first. The way we see it does.

The Knife in 12 Angry Men: When the Greatest Obstacle to Truth Is No Longer the Evidence. Many people remember the knife scene in 12 Angry Men (1957) as the turning point of the trial. But what Sidney Lumet truly changes is not the evidence itself. He changes the state of mind of the people looking at it. The scene does not prove the defendant's innocence, nor does it dismantle the prosecution's entire case. Instead, it reveals that the greatest barrier to truth is no longer a lack of facts, but the jurors' attachment to the conclusions they have already reached. That is the scene's deepest cinematic achievement. From the very beginning, Lumet creates an atmosphere of certainty. The jurors are no longer genuinely investigating the case. They are reinforcing what they already believe. They do not examine the evidence to understand what happened; they examine it to confirm a verdict they have already accepted. The film never explains this through speeches or exposition. It emerges naturally through the impatient rhythm of the dialogue, the eagerness to end deliberations, and the unspoken assumption that the outcome has already been decided. Once a conclusion no longer feels worth questioning, perception itself begins to close. That is why the knife appears with such remarkable restraint. Lumet never presents it as a dramatic revelation. There is no swelling score announcing a breakthrough, no rapid editing designed to shock the audience. Juror No. 8 simply places an identical knife on the table. The gesture introduces no new truth. It merely dissolves something everyone had assumed was beyond question. The real change does not happen on the tabletop. It happens in the minds of the people gathered around it. This is also why the camera lingers far longer on faces than on the knife itself. Lumet understands that the evidence is not the true subject of the scene. The real subject is the moment when perception begins to shift. Hesitant glances, prolonged silences, and subtle expressions of uncertainty appear not because the jurors have discovered the truth, but because they have lost the certainty that they already possessed it. The film is not recording a victory in debate. It is capturing an inner transformation. What makes the sequence especially remarkable is that almost none of the evidence changes afterward. The witnesses remain the same. The crime scene remains the same. The case itself remains the same. What changes is the way the jurors look at everything they already have before them. Once certainty begins to crack, details that had been present all along suddenly become worthy of genuine scrutiny. Lumet does not add new truth to the story. He removes what has been preventing the characters from seeing it. Perhaps that is why the knife scene continues to resonate nearly seventy years later. It speaks to something far larger than a courtroom. In life, what keeps us from seeing reality clearly is often not the absence of evidence, but our attachment to conclusions we have already embraced. Once we become invested in being right, new evidence is easily absorbed into the beliefs we already hold. Only when that attachment begins to loosen can perception truly open again. The world does not change first. The way we see it does.

Love Classical Music and Movies 🎺🎻💖🎥🎬

15,735 views • 3 months ago

Documents reveal the Los Angeles Fire Department was in on the coverup of the Pacific Palisades fire Fire official exposes the department purposely withheld information about the re-ignition site in their after action report “So, the fire department willfully covered it up and kept the secret” “At least one department official learned that a battalion chief had directed the firefighters to pack up their hoses and leave the scene, even though they said the ground was smoking, the rocks were hot. Now, The Times originally found this out because of the text messages that the firefighters wrote. Now, this is another department official. But the department did not include that story or any detailed examination of the reignition in the after action report. So, the fire department willfully covered it up and kept the secret. No respect for all the people who lost their homes or for the families who had loved ones who lost their lives. None.“

Documents reveal the Los Angeles Fire Department was in on the coverup of the Pacific Palisades fire Fire official exposes the department purposely withheld information about the re-ignition site in their after action report “So, the fire department willfully covered it up and kept the secret” “At least one department official learned that a battalion chief had directed the firefighters to pack up their hoses and leave the scene, even though they said the ground was smoking, the rocks were hot. Now, The Times originally found this out because of the text messages that the firefighters wrote. Now, this is another department official. But the department did not include that story or any detailed examination of the reignition in the after action report. So, the fire department willfully covered it up and kept the secret. No respect for all the people who lost their homes or for the families who had loved ones who lost their lives. None.“

Wall Street Apes

57,239 views • 11 months ago

$On the first day of #Ransamwad, Gen Upendra Dwivedi, Chief of the Army Staff spoke on ‘Visualisation of #MDO.’ The Army Chief highlighted four main imperatives : the reality of a “Permanent Conflict” world, how a land force commander must read the battle across domains, how different domains interact in operations and how the Army is transforming #MDO from concept into capability. The #COAS said that #MDO is not about six domains operating in parallel, but of six domains in constant dynamic interaction with each other, where the weight keeps shifting and the lead changes. The battlefield is “no longer a line on a map but is layered three dimensionally ” and “the commander who sees only his own sector sees only a fraction of the war.” The Chief also stressed that fragmented responses will not work hereafter.” The way ahead is to move “from domain silos to domain fusion”. #GLobalTrend #Multidomainoperations #Jointmanship #Atmanirbharbharat रक्षा मंत्री कार्यालय/ RMO India Sanjay Seth Ministry of Defence, Government of India TRACOMIAF_CMCC ADG PI - INDIAN ARMY$

On the first day of #Ransamwad, Gen Upendra Dwivedi, Chief of the Army Staff spoke on ‘Visualisation of #MDO.’ The Army Chief highlighted four main imperatives : the reality of a “Permanent Conflict” world, how a land force commander must read the battle across domains, how different domains interact in operations and how the Army is transforming #MDO from concept into capability. The #COAS said that #MDO is not about six domains operating in parallel, but of six domains in constant dynamic interaction with each other, where the weight keeps shifting and the lead changes. The battlefield is “no longer a line on a map but is layered three dimensionally ” and “the commander who sees only his own sector sees only a fraction of the war.” The Chief also stressed that fragmented responses will not work hereafter.” The way ahead is to move “from domain silos to domain fusion”. #GLobalTrend #Multidomainoperations #Jointmanship #Atmanirbharbharat रक्षा मंत्री कार्यालय/ RMO India Sanjay Seth Ministry of Defence, Government of India TRACOMIAF_CMCC ADG PI - INDIAN ARMY

HQ IDS

19,129 views • 6 months ago