Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Bbc? No problem That what she said and she proved it 👀 #petite #perkytits #bbc #nsfw #dickriding #blowjobs #backshots #grizzly #daddyfucking #slobbering #petitebony #hardcore Sex n Scotch 🥃 Deluxe Baddies 🍑

𝔹𝕚𝕘 𝔹🍑🍑𝕥𝕪 𝔹𝕒𝕕𝕕𝕚𝕖𝕤 |𝟚𝟝𝟘𝕜|

246,903 subscribers

58,168 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #petite #perkytits #bbc #nsfw #dickriding #blowjobs #backshots #grizzly #daddyfucking #slobbering #petitebony #hardcore

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Lazy journalists from BBC News Africa like Wedaeli Chibelushi refuse to tell what's really going on in Uganda and resort to "he said,she said" stories. Beautifully written, but useless. She writes "it is believed that security forces killed" but forgets HER OWN COLLEAGUES proved it!/1

Lazy journalists from BBC News Africa like Wedaeli Chibelushi refuse to tell what's really going on in Uganda and resort to "he said,she said" stories. Beautifully written, but useless. She writes "it is believed that security forces killed" but forgets HER OWN COLLEAGUES proved it!/1

Dr Nico

14,431 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Mizkif COULDN'T BELIEVE IT after reading that Kyedae told former Tenz's teammate she wanted to EXPERIMENT WITH OTHER MEN 👀 "Kyedae told me multiple times, in multiple ways, that she wanted to experiment with other men. And that was quite some time ago, so I can only imagine what she acted on." "Oh shit, bitch, what the fk? No way." "So Kyedae said to him that she wants to experiment with other men? No way."

Mizkif COULDN'T BELIEVE IT after reading that Kyedae told former Tenz's teammate she wanted to EXPERIMENT WITH OTHER MEN 👀 "Kyedae told me multiple times, in multiple ways, that she wanted to experiment with other men. And that was quite some time ago, so I can only imagine what she acted on." "Oh shit, bitch, what the fk? No way." "So Kyedae said to him that she wants to experiment with other men? No way."

Plug

3,044,577 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Mia Malkova shared that she sympathizes with people who are rejected by their families for working in the ad6lt entertainment industry. She said her parents have always supported her career decisions and have no problem with what she does, adding that her siblings watch some of her contents. However, she explained that their opinions don’t affect her much because her parents’ support is what matters most to her. 👀💔 “I feel really sorry for people when I hear that their families will disown them for their choices, Even my siblings watch my content. They are adults and they can make whatever decisions they want.” 👀👀💔

Mia Malkova shared that she sympathizes with people who are rejected by their families for working in the ad6lt entertainment industry. She said her parents have always supported her career decisions and have no problem with what she does, adding that her siblings watch some of her contents. However, she explained that their opinions don’t affect her much because her parents’ support is what matters most to her. 👀💔 “I feel really sorry for people when I hear that their families will disown them for their choices, Even my siblings watch my content. They are adults and they can make whatever decisions they want.” 👀👀💔

hyz

82,039 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

BBC PAID HIM 6X MORE. THE TRIBUNAL SAID THAT WAS ILLEGAL. THE BBC SAID IT WAS COMPLICATED. Samira Ahmed Samira Ahmed presented Newswatch on BBC for years. Same format. Same length. Same job. Read viewer feedback on camera, wrap it up, go home. Jeremy Vine Jeremy Vine | Here, on Tiktok, Insta & Facebook did exactly the same thing on Points of View. She got £440 per episode. He got £3,000. Ahmed spent years trying to fix it quietly through internal BBC processes. The BBC said there was no problem. She filed for tribunal. In January 2020, the tribunal ruled unanimously in her favour. The BBC could not explain the difference. They tried. They argued Vine needed "a glint in the eye" and to be "cheeky." The tribunal said that was not a skill. It was a story the BBC told itself. The total underpayment was close to £700,000. Sarah Montague, another BBC woman, settled separately for around £400,000. The National Union of Journalists flagged around 70 more cases waiting resolution internally. After Ahmed won, 700 BBC women received pay rises. The BBC's statement after losing? They regretted it had gone to tribunal. Not that they paid a woman six times less than a man for the same work for years. Just that it became public. Sources: The Guardian, BBC, IFJ, Others

BBC PAID HIM 6X MORE. THE TRIBUNAL SAID THAT WAS ILLEGAL. THE BBC SAID IT WAS COMPLICATED. Samira Ahmed Samira Ahmed presented Newswatch on BBC for years. Same format. Same length. Same job. Read viewer feedback on camera, wrap it up, go home. Jeremy Vine Jeremy Vine | Here, on Tiktok, Insta & Facebook did exactly the same thing on Points of View. She got £440 per episode. He got £3,000. Ahmed spent years trying to fix it quietly through internal BBC processes. The BBC said there was no problem. She filed for tribunal. In January 2020, the tribunal ruled unanimously in her favour. The BBC could not explain the difference. They tried. They argued Vine needed "a glint in the eye" and to be "cheeky." The tribunal said that was not a skill. It was a story the BBC told itself. The total underpayment was close to £700,000. Sarah Montague, another BBC woman, settled separately for around £400,000. The National Union of Journalists flagged around 70 more cases waiting resolution internally. After Ahmed won, 700 BBC women received pay rises. The BBC's statement after losing? They regretted it had gone to tribunal. Not that they paid a woman six times less than a man for the same work for years. Just that it became public. Sources: The Guardian, BBC, IFJ, Others

Artur Nadolny

283,307 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Cam Newton continued his story and revealed he actually finished in the girls mouth without even doing the real thing and he didn’t even realize it was n-t when he finished, and when they started the real thing he wasted a c-ndom because he didn’t know how to roll it on💀😭🤦🏽‍♂️ “She said “no you didn’t” i said what, she had some like foam coming out of her mouth, I’m asking her real time like what’s that, she was like “it’s n-t stupid” “I run back downstairs, my partner was like bro what happened you smashed, i was like yeah i smashed he said what happened, i said she taught me off, he was like ngga you didn’t smash she just gave you head”😭

Sensitive content

Cam Newton continued his story and revealed he actually finished in the girls mouth without even doing the real thing and he didn’t even realize it was n-t when he finished, and when they started the real thing he wasted a c-ndom because he didn’t know how to roll it on💀😭🤦🏽‍♂️ “She said “no you didn’t” i said what, she had some like foam coming out of her mouth, I’m asking her real time like what’s that, she was like “it’s n-t stupid” “I run back downstairs, my partner was like bro what happened you smashed, i was like yeah i smashed he said what happened, i said she taught me off, he was like ngga you didn’t smash she just gave you head”😭

flame

836,115 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The BBC presenter asked Tucker if Trump should be removed via the 25th Amendment. Tucker — because he's an unbelievable coward — dodged the question and said he wants to change the "mechanism" that allows Israel to control the U.S. When she pressed him for what that mechanism actually is, and what proof he has of its existence, he had no answer to either.

The BBC presenter asked Tucker if Trump should be removed via the 25th Amendment. Tucker — because he's an unbelievable coward — dodged the question and said he wants to change the "mechanism" that allows Israel to control the U.S. When she pressed him for what that mechanism actually is, and what proof he has of its existence, he had no answer to either.

Eitan Fischberger

98,130 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This woman received a summons to appear in court for theft based on flock camera evidence that she was stealing packages. The problem for law enforcement is that she had her own cameras set up, which absolutely proved that it wasn’t her. The officer refused to show her the evidence at her door because he said that she was arguing with him and not being forthright. When you look at the camera footage, it is two totally different people. He absolutely was refusing to cooperate with her. He was convinced that the camera footage showed her, even though she had camera footage to prove that it wasn’t. This is the danger of these cameras. Law enforcement in some cases is using and abusing them . Ultimately, she was able to prove her innocence using her own camera footage, but what if she didn’t have her own cameras set up?

This woman received a summons to appear in court for theft based on flock camera evidence that she was stealing packages. The problem for law enforcement is that she had her own cameras set up, which absolutely proved that it wasn’t her. The officer refused to show her the evidence at her door because he said that she was arguing with him and not being forthright. When you look at the camera footage, it is two totally different people. He absolutely was refusing to cooperate with her. He was convinced that the camera footage showed her, even though she had camera footage to prove that it wasn’t. This is the danger of these cameras. Law enforcement in some cases is using and abusing them . Ultimately, she was able to prove her innocence using her own camera footage, but what if she didn’t have her own cameras set up?

Leah Rain ✝️🇺🇸🎸🏝️

2,338,054 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Epstein survivor Lisa Ann Phillips Says that in 2003 Epstein forced her friend To have sex with former Prince Andrew In Epstein's Upper East Side house in New York "She didn't want to, she argued with him. She said he made her. A few minutes later, he discarded her and walked out" "After that she was traumatised. She left crying. She called me right away. She couldn't understand why Epstein made her do that" Victoria Derbyshire, "Epstein made her go into the room with Andrew and have sex with him?" Lisa Ann Phillips, "That's what happened" "I said to Epstein, why did you make her do that?" "Epstein, grinned, smirked, and said: I like to have things on people" Victoria Derbyshire, "He likes to have things on people?" Lisa Ann Phillips, "I remember, I wrote it in my diary" Victoria Derbyshire, "Have the police in the UK asked to interview you about what your friend alleged Andrew did?" Lisa Ann Phillips, "No"

Epstein survivor Lisa Ann Phillips Says that in 2003 Epstein forced her friend To have sex with former Prince Andrew In Epstein's Upper East Side house in New York "She didn't want to, she argued with him. She said he made her. A few minutes later, he discarded her and walked out" "After that she was traumatised. She left crying. She called me right away. She couldn't understand why Epstein made her do that" Victoria Derbyshire, "Epstein made her go into the room with Andrew and have sex with him?" Lisa Ann Phillips, "That's what happened" "I said to Epstein, why did you make her do that?" "Epstein, grinned, smirked, and said: I like to have things on people" Victoria Derbyshire, "He likes to have things on people?" Lisa Ann Phillips, "I remember, I wrote it in my diary" Victoria Derbyshire, "Have the police in the UK asked to interview you about what your friend alleged Andrew did?" Lisa Ann Phillips, "No"

Farrukh

695,423 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Caleb Hammer couldn’t believe what his guest called “Pressure” Guest: My ex-girlfriend pressured me for sex. She kept pestering me until I said yes. Caleb Hammer: Wait, hold on. What do you mean she pressured you into sex? Guest: She kept pestering me until I said yes. Caleb Hammer: Constantly? Guest: Constantly. Caleb Hammer: What was the pestering? What does that look like? Guest: We had just gotten back together, and I was like, “Hey, I don’t want to do this. I want to work on our relationship.” She was constantly asking me. Caleb Hammer: Okay, well, that’s not inherently bad in a relationship. How she does it might be bad, but if you’re just saying, “Hey, can we have sex?” Guest: No, she was just trying to start things, and I would stop her. Caleb Hammer: Okay… she was making a move. Did she stop when you said no? Guest: Yeah, but she would constantly keep doing it. Caleb Hammer: Making a move in a relationship is bad? What the f** is happening?! Guest: She flipped the script and said I was the one doing that, and my mom believed her. Caleb Hammer: Who even cares who’s asking who for sex when dating?! Guest: She said I was pressuring her into it. Caleb Hammer: “Pressuring.” Dude, making a move isn’t pressuring! Your partner making a move on you, and stopping when you say no, is not assault! You are not a victim! No one believes anything anymore for the real victims because of you! You’ve destroyed the dating pool. The sexlessness among young people is your fault. The lack of cold approach is your fault. You’ve destroyed our dating culture.

Caleb Hammer couldn’t believe what his guest called “Pressure” Guest: My ex-girlfriend pressured me for sex. She kept pestering me until I said yes. Caleb Hammer: Wait, hold on. What do you mean she pressured you into sex? Guest: She kept pestering me until I said yes. Caleb Hammer: Constantly? Guest: Constantly. Caleb Hammer: What was the pestering? What does that look like? Guest: We had just gotten back together, and I was like, “Hey, I don’t want to do this. I want to work on our relationship.” She was constantly asking me. Caleb Hammer: Okay, well, that’s not inherently bad in a relationship. How she does it might be bad, but if you’re just saying, “Hey, can we have sex?” Guest: No, she was just trying to start things, and I would stop her. Caleb Hammer: Okay… she was making a move. Did she stop when you said no? Guest: Yeah, but she would constantly keep doing it. Caleb Hammer: Making a move in a relationship is bad? What the f** is happening?! Guest: She flipped the script and said I was the one doing that, and my mom believed her. Caleb Hammer: Who even cares who’s asking who for sex when dating?! Guest: She said I was pressuring her into it. Caleb Hammer: “Pressuring.” Dude, making a move isn’t pressuring! Your partner making a move on you, and stopping when you say no, is not assault! You are not a victim! No one believes anything anymore for the real victims because of you! You’ve destroyed the dating pool. The sexlessness among young people is your fault. The lack of cold approach is your fault. You’ve destroyed our dating culture.

‏ً

706,571 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Does anybody know what Kemi Badenoch actually means? Because I don't think even she knows what she means 🤷‍♂️ KB, "You cannot change your sex, you can change your legal sex" Ed Balls, "So you are saying you are happy with people changing their legal sex?" KB, "Yes" EB, "You want to change the law to be clear that someone can change their legal sex" KB, "When we do this we will be able to distinguish between sex and gender" EB, "I assumed you were going to legislate that people cannot change their sex at birth, but you're telling us that you're going to change the law so somebody can change their legal sex" KB, "No no no I'm sorry Ed no that's not what I said" EB, "That's what you just said" KB, "We're clarifying the law to saw that the Equality Act when it refers to sex refers to biological sex.. The gender recognition.. We need to move away from the term legal sex and talk about gender" EB, "You used that term, not me" KB, "Yes yes because that is what the law is now. I'm talking about what the law is and how we're trying to clarify it and make it clearer for the future"

Does anybody know what Kemi Badenoch actually means? Because I don't think even she knows what she means 🤷‍♂️ KB, "You cannot change your sex, you can change your legal sex" Ed Balls, "So you are saying you are happy with people changing their legal sex?" KB, "Yes" EB, "You want to change the law to be clear that someone can change their legal sex" KB, "When we do this we will be able to distinguish between sex and gender" EB, "I assumed you were going to legislate that people cannot change their sex at birth, but you're telling us that you're going to change the law so somebody can change their legal sex" KB, "No no no I'm sorry Ed no that's not what I said" EB, "That's what you just said" KB, "We're clarifying the law to saw that the Equality Act when it refers to sex refers to biological sex.. The gender recognition.. We need to move away from the term legal sex and talk about gender" EB, "You used that term, not me" KB, "Yes yes because that is what the law is now. I'm talking about what the law is and how we're trying to clarify it and make it clearer for the future"

Farrukh

930,203 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

During an interview with Asha Sharma, BBC News said Halo isn't shining as bright as it used to and asked Asha what will she do to bring Halo back to the top spot. Asha said she's confident that Halo is a very important part of Xbox's portfolio, is focused on Halo's importance, and they will have news to share on Halo going forward. #Xbox #Halo

During an interview with Asha Sharma, BBC News said Halo isn't shining as bright as it used to and asked Asha what will she do to bring Halo back to the top spot. Asha said she's confident that Halo is a very important part of Xbox's portfolio, is focused on Halo's importance, and they will have news to share on Halo going forward. #Xbox #Halo

Rebs Gaming

376,654 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Chum’s journey in Bigg Boss has been a testament to resilience and unshakable self-respect—and she proved it once again. With the odds stacked high against her, Chum fought fiercely—not just for herself, but for her loyal friends who poured their hearts into seeing her succeed. Then came the ultimate twist. Her competitor, despite winning, couldn’t even own the victory. The Ticket to Finale was offered to Chum instead. And here’s where she dropped the mic—she said no. Why? Because Chum doesn’t do freebies. She refused to take what she hadn’t earned, showing that her self-respect and integrity matter more. Chum may have lost the Ticket to Finale, but she walked away with something priceless—the hearts of millions and a legacy no one can touch 🫶🏻 In a world chasing shortcuts, Chum proved that the ultimate power move is staying true to who you are 🫶🏻❤️🫶🏻 #ChumStars #ChumDarang𓃵 #BBQueen #ChumIsTheBoss #BBQueenChum #jiocinema Endemol Shine India Jio Cinema Colors TV

Chum’s journey in Bigg Boss has been a testament to resilience and unshakable self-respect—and she proved it once again. With the odds stacked high against her, Chum fought fiercely—not just for herself, but for her loyal friends who poured their hearts into seeing her succeed. Then came the ultimate twist. Her competitor, despite winning, couldn’t even own the victory. The Ticket to Finale was offered to Chum instead. And here’s where she dropped the mic—she said no. Why? Because Chum doesn’t do freebies. She refused to take what she hadn’t earned, showing that her self-respect and integrity matter more. Chum may have lost the Ticket to Finale, but she walked away with something priceless—the hearts of millions and a legacy no one can touch 🫶🏻 In a world chasing shortcuts, Chum proved that the ultimate power move is staying true to who you are 🫶🏻❤️🫶🏻 #ChumStars #ChumDarang𓃵 #BBQueen #ChumIsTheBoss #BBQueenChum #jiocinema Endemol Shine India Jio Cinema Colors TV

Chum Darang

33,283 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

SHE SOLVED A 50-YEAR-OLD MATH PROBLEM IN UNDER A WEEK BECAUSE SHE DIDN'T THINK IT COUNTED AS REAL WORK lisa piccirillo, 2018, graduate student at UT Austin. she hears about the Conway knot at a conference and starts poking at it in the evenings. her own words: she wouldn't let herself work on it during the day, because she didn't consider it to be real math. she thought of it like homework. the problem had stood since the 1960s. of every knot with twelve or fewer crossings, mathematicians had determined "sliceness" for all of them except one. that one had a sculpture of itself on a gate at Cambridge's Isaac Newton Institute. she cracked it in under a week. the method is the elegant part. she built a different knot that shares the same four-dimensional trace as Conway's, proved hers wasn't slice, and since trace siblings share slice status, Conway's isn't either. then she mentioned it casually to Cameron Gordon, a senior topologist. he started shouting "why aren't you more excited?" and said it was going to the Annals immediately. it did. she was at MIT fourteen months out of grad school. and the reason her field exists at all is genuinely strange. four dimensions is the only one that breaks. flat n-dimensional space has exactly one smooth structure for every value of n. except four, where there are uncountably infinitely many. not three. not five. not eleven. four. nobody fully knows why.

SHE SOLVED A 50-YEAR-OLD MATH PROBLEM IN UNDER A WEEK BECAUSE SHE DIDN'T THINK IT COUNTED AS REAL WORK lisa piccirillo, 2018, graduate student at UT Austin. she hears about the Conway knot at a conference and starts poking at it in the evenings. her own words: she wouldn't let herself work on it during the day, because she didn't consider it to be real math. she thought of it like homework. the problem had stood since the 1960s. of every knot with twelve or fewer crossings, mathematicians had determined "sliceness" for all of them except one. that one had a sculpture of itself on a gate at Cambridge's Isaac Newton Institute. she cracked it in under a week. the method is the elegant part. she built a different knot that shares the same four-dimensional trace as Conway's, proved hers wasn't slice, and since trace siblings share slice status, Conway's isn't either. then she mentioned it casually to Cameron Gordon, a senior topologist. he started shouting "why aren't you more excited?" and said it was going to the Annals immediately. it did. she was at MIT fourteen months out of grad school. and the reason her field exists at all is genuinely strange. four dimensions is the only one that breaks. flat n-dimensional space has exactly one smooth structure for every value of n. except four, where there are uncountably infinitely many. not three. not five. not eleven. four. nobody fully knows why.

@kleos

1,376,290 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚶‍♀️She walked through NYC for 10 hours wearing jeans and a T-shirt… and secretly recorded what happened. Within minutes, the catcalling started. Strangers shouting at her. Men are trying to stop her. One even followed her down the street, talking to her for several minutes while she said absolutely nothing. No conversation. No eye contact. Just walking. The video is going viral because it shows something many women say they deal with constantly — being approached, commented on, or followed just for existing in public. 10 hours of walking. Dozens of unwanted interactions. And she never said a word. 👀 It just proves that it doesn't matter what a woman wears. They get harassed daily.

🚶‍♀️She walked through NYC for 10 hours wearing jeans and a T-shirt… and secretly recorded what happened. Within minutes, the catcalling started. Strangers shouting at her. Men are trying to stop her. One even followed her down the street, talking to her for several minutes while she said absolutely nothing. No conversation. No eye contact. Just walking. The video is going viral because it shows something many women say they deal with constantly — being approached, commented on, or followed just for existing in public. 10 hours of walking. Dozens of unwanted interactions. And she never said a word. 👀 It just proves that it doesn't matter what a woman wears. They get harassed daily.

🎹 Ames™ 🎹

179,587 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Uber driver pay is broken. Or is it? I showed an Uber exec a $9.07 offer that worked out to about $9.72/hour after my vehicle costs. She asked me, “Did you take it?” I said no. “Then what’s the problem?” That question sent me down a rabbit hole on rate cards, dynamic pricing, agency, bad offers, transparency, and what “fair pay” actually means.

Uber driver pay is broken. Or is it? I showed an Uber exec a $9.07 offer that worked out to about $9.72/hour after my vehicle costs. She asked me, “Did you take it?” I said no. “Then what’s the problem?” That question sent me down a rabbit hole on rate cards, dynamic pricing, agency, bad offers, transparency, and what “fair pay” actually means.

Levi Spires

14,031 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

When Scarlett was giving it to Zeudi about McDonalds Motorbike and her smart car He wrote, “Limit yourself to your McDonald’s and your Fiat Panda.” “Do you understand what Scarlett wrote?” She wrote, “Limit yourself.” She said, “I’m limited.” “Good. Okay. Don’t worry, I’m going to limit myself to your McDonald’s today anyway.” Mary Marfella is determined to make me eat today, just like yesterday. No, like yesterday. Yesterday I ate McDonald’s because I thought it was going to be the last time. I thought it was the last time, but actually I ate it again today. So that’s the problem. “What did she write?” I sent an audio message. “You’re limited.” I said, “Just stick to your McDonald’s, your Fiat, and your Smart, and leave the motorbikes to me.” She said, “Limit yourself to your McDonald’s, your Fiat Panda, and your Smart, and I’ll stick to my motorbikes.” Oh, she wrote it in Italian. What a coincidence. She wrote it in Italian. I was mentally working out a strategy to tell your mother that this has nothing to do with me and that I don’t approve of this behavior. Anyway, Scarlett understood my mother far too well. Much more than I do. “I’m a bitch for you.” “Yes.” She was saying that she didn’t know anything about this and that she didn’t approve of this behavior. But now I want the motorbike. “But why?” “She has all the money for this motorbike.” “But then I’d also have to get my license.” “Let’s say you wouldn’t be bad if you got your license.” “I don’t know if Mum is watching me.” “There you go.” Anyway… “No, no, no. Not for the moment.” By the way, I’m lending it to my brother #zeudiners #zeudi

When Scarlett was giving it to Zeudi about McDonalds Motorbike and her smart car He wrote, “Limit yourself to your McDonald’s and your Fiat Panda.” “Do you understand what Scarlett wrote?” She wrote, “Limit yourself.” She said, “I’m limited.” “Good. Okay. Don’t worry, I’m going to limit myself to your McDonald’s today anyway.” Mary Marfella is determined to make me eat today, just like yesterday. No, like yesterday. Yesterday I ate McDonald’s because I thought it was going to be the last time. I thought it was the last time, but actually I ate it again today. So that’s the problem. “What did she write?” I sent an audio message. “You’re limited.” I said, “Just stick to your McDonald’s, your Fiat, and your Smart, and leave the motorbikes to me.” She said, “Limit yourself to your McDonald’s, your Fiat Panda, and your Smart, and I’ll stick to my motorbikes.” Oh, she wrote it in Italian. What a coincidence. She wrote it in Italian. I was mentally working out a strategy to tell your mother that this has nothing to do with me and that I don’t approve of this behavior. Anyway, Scarlett understood my mother far too well. Much more than I do. “I’m a bitch for you.” “Yes.” She was saying that she didn’t know anything about this and that she didn’t approve of this behavior. But now I want the motorbike. “But why?” “She has all the money for this motorbike.” “But then I’d also have to get my license.” “Let’s say you wouldn’t be bad if you got your license.” “I don’t know if Mum is watching me.” “There you go.” Anyway… “No, no, no. Not for the moment.” By the way, I’m lending it to my brother #zeudiners #zeudi

Suave (ZeZe) 🌸💕

80,022 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Watch Candace contradict herself from one month to the next. 👇👇👇 In January, Candace confirmed that a TPUSA donor who’s a “very good person” and was at the Aspen retreat said that Charlie did actually say he’d want Erika to take over in the event of something happening. Candace said the story “checked out” and that she had her answer. Now, she’s telling us that another donor has said actually no Charlie said nothing of the sort. Obviously two separate donors can say two separate things; it happens. The problem is that Candace is pretending she never said what she said in January. She seems to have forgotten all about this very good person donor from January who’s story checked out. She doesn’t seem at all concerned that this donor apparently lied to her, and she doesn’t explain to her audience—an audience she claims to be working with to “crowdsource” an “investigation”—why she believes one donor over the other. Both (or all) donors remain unnamed, so we can’t check for ourselves why we’re getting conflicting stories from them and from Candace. Another problem? Candace is now saying that Charlie saying this in Aspen never passed the sniff test for her—but if that’s the case, why did she hide that from us in January? Why didn’t she clue her audience into that? The audience she again claims to be working alongside? Why did she lead us to believe the story checked out if it “didn’t pass the sniff test”? Candace is making it up as she goes along. Her story shifts from month to month—not in the typical way for a fluid investigation but rather in ways wherein she all-out contradicts herself from one month to the next and never actually explains why. It’s as if previous months are simply forgotten by her—and she’s hoping you’ll forget too.

Watch Candace contradict herself from one month to the next. 👇👇👇 In January, Candace confirmed that a TPUSA donor who’s a “very good person” and was at the Aspen retreat said that Charlie did actually say he’d want Erika to take over in the event of something happening. Candace said the story “checked out” and that she had her answer. Now, she’s telling us that another donor has said actually no Charlie said nothing of the sort. Obviously two separate donors can say two separate things; it happens. The problem is that Candace is pretending she never said what she said in January. She seems to have forgotten all about this very good person donor from January who’s story checked out. She doesn’t seem at all concerned that this donor apparently lied to her, and she doesn’t explain to her audience—an audience she claims to be working with to “crowdsource” an “investigation”—why she believes one donor over the other. Both (or all) donors remain unnamed, so we can’t check for ourselves why we’re getting conflicting stories from them and from Candace. Another problem? Candace is now saying that Charlie saying this in Aspen never passed the sniff test for her—but if that’s the case, why did she hide that from us in January? Why didn’t she clue her audience into that? The audience she again claims to be working alongside? Why did she lead us to believe the story checked out if it “didn’t pass the sniff test”? Candace is making it up as she goes along. Her story shifts from month to month—not in the typical way for a fluid investigation but rather in ways wherein she all-out contradicts herself from one month to the next and never actually explains why. It’s as if previous months are simply forgotten by her—and she’s hoping you’ll forget too.

Natalie Jean Beisner

82,035 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

‼️Candace Drops More Unseen September 10 Footage Tonight — No Commentary, Just The People Around Charlie 👀 Candace Owens is on tonight with two clocks running at once. The Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing is over. The judge still has not said whether the state met probable cause and whether this case is bound over for trial. She said she will recap how we got here and what each side actually argued, and she will watch that ruling live if it drops. That is not the only reason to be in the room. She promised more never-before-seen footage from Utah Valley University on September 10, and she is keeping the promise. She said she will play it without a lecture. No overlay telling you what to see. Just the tape of the people standing around Charlie that day, and the space to decide for yourself whether their behavior looks like a campus event or something else. The official story has always depended on you not looking too long at the people closest to him. Tonight the raw clip is the argument. Watch it before someone else tells you it means nothing. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

‼️Candace Drops More Unseen September 10 Footage Tonight — No Commentary, Just The People Around Charlie 👀 Candace Owens is on tonight with two clocks running at once. The Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing is over. The judge still has not said whether the state met probable cause and whether this case is bound over for trial. She said she will recap how we got here and what each side actually argued, and she will watch that ruling live if it drops. That is not the only reason to be in the room. She promised more never-before-seen footage from Utah Valley University on September 10, and she is keeping the promise. She said she will play it without a lecture. No overlay telling you what to see. Just the tape of the people standing around Charlie that day, and the space to decide for yourself whether their behavior looks like a campus event or something else. The official story has always depended on you not looking too long at the people closest to him. Tonight the raw clip is the argument. Watch it before someone else tells you it means nothing. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

23,241 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Lisa Nandy MP has said she is leaving X because it now favours misinformation over meaningful debate. In contrast, she praises the BBC as one of the "greatest defences against mistrust and misinformation." However, during the pandemic, the BBC wildly exaggerated the risk of Covid, promoted worst-case scenarios, sidelined scientific dissent, and helped create the climate of intense fear that justified lockdowns. And, of course, Prof. Devi Sridhar on BBC Newsround lied directly to the nation's children about Pfizer's experimental Covid vaccine, saying "So far the trials have shown the vaccine is 100% safe for children." What Lisa Nandy really means by "misinformation" is speech that the government disapproves of (which is, more often than not, the truth they don't want you to hear).

Lisa Nandy MP has said she is leaving X because it now favours misinformation over meaningful debate. In contrast, she praises the BBC as one of the "greatest defences against mistrust and misinformation." However, during the pandemic, the BBC wildly exaggerated the risk of Covid, promoted worst-case scenarios, sidelined scientific dissent, and helped create the climate of intense fear that justified lockdowns. And, of course, Prof. Devi Sridhar on BBC Newsround lied directly to the nation's children about Pfizer's experimental Covid vaccine, saying "So far the trials have shown the vaccine is 100% safe for children." What Lisa Nandy really means by "misinformation" is speech that the government disapproves of (which is, more often than not, the truth they don't want you to hear).

Mike Fairclough

64,044 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I had honestly forgotten that Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) even existed, but then I saw she shared her future plans. It’s a riot! 😂 She says she wants to go back to practicing law, write a book, do podcasts, do political commentary, teach, take speaking engagements, and take care of herself. Crockett also says she wants to get involved in the “disinformation game.” She blames it for her crushing loss in Texas. Her real problem is herself. Like most failed politicians, she refuses to acknowledge that people simply didn’t like what she had to say or how she said it. Instead of coming up with positive policies to help people, she focused on race 24/7. She also proved herself to be an extreme hater of white people. Sadly, that’s all she’ll be remembered for. Crockett’s brief political career is yet another cautionary tale of how identity politics is shallow and leaves one empty in the end. That’s why Crockett will now go back to being forgotten—and come next January, no longer in Congress. Whoever worked hard to make sure she lost her reelection, thank you. Now let’s deal with that lunatic James Talarico. (.magsmedia on TT)

I had honestly forgotten that Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) even existed, but then I saw she shared her future plans. It’s a riot! 😂 She says she wants to go back to practicing law, write a book, do podcasts, do political commentary, teach, take speaking engagements, and take care of herself. Crockett also says she wants to get involved in the “disinformation game.” She blames it for her crushing loss in Texas. Her real problem is herself. Like most failed politicians, she refuses to acknowledge that people simply didn’t like what she had to say or how she said it. Instead of coming up with positive policies to help people, she focused on race 24/7. She also proved herself to be an extreme hater of white people. Sadly, that’s all she’ll be remembered for. Crockett’s brief political career is yet another cautionary tale of how identity politics is shallow and leaves one empty in the end. That’s why Crockett will now go back to being forgotten—and come next January, no longer in Congress. Whoever worked hard to make sure she lost her reelection, thank you. Now let’s deal with that lunatic James Talarico. (.magsmedia on TT)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

74,024 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten