Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

=° Beach Day °= { Gacha Animation } ( collab with 𝐁𝐥𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐲𝐇𝐞𝐚𝐭🔞) - audio placed by blake - #Gachaclub #Gacha #Gachalife #nsfwanimation #nsfw #gachacommunitynsfw #gachansfw

5 Comments

𝐁𝐥𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐲𝐇𝐞𝐚𝐭🔞 𝕏 's profile picture
𝐁𝐥𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐲𝐇𝐞𝐚𝐭🔞 𝕏 1 year ago

PUSSAY👀

Kira's profile picture
Kira1 year ago

@Blake_HeatNSFW You do animation well

Tomioka's profile picture
Tomioka1 year ago

@Blake_HeatNSFW Que preciosa y que sexy😍😍😍😍

Neon's profile picture
Neon1 year ago

@Blake_HeatNSFW :°✨

Huy Bùi's profile picture
Huy Bùi1 year ago

@Blake_HeatNSFW Would💥🔥

Related Videos

📢 Excited to announce that the new season of Brawl will launch this August and will be focused on Risk to Earn, featuring: ⚔️Paid Competition: 80% of all revenue goes towards the Pro Leaderboard 📱Cross-platform: Play from Browser, Mobile PWA, or the Telegram app, and against players in all devices 💰 Real Money Wagering: There will be a game mode where you will be able to bet real money, and maybe more things 👀, against other players. ⚡️ Energy System: Players will start with 5/5 Energy. Every time you enter a game, 1 energy is spent. Pro Brawlers get extra energy each day. 🔷Shards: Shards are obtained by playing. Winning awards more Shards. Shards can also be bought in packages. 80% of everything spent will go to the Pro Leaderboard. 🐗 Beast Gacha: Shards will be used to roll the Beast Gacha. Every roll guarantees a Beast Unlock. This will be your main form of progression. Beasts start on Lv 1 with base Skill Points. Gacha Beasts are not NFTs and only playable characters, and they will be reset after every season. 🐲NFT Beasts: Your NFT Beasts will insta unlock a Merge Lv1 of the Beast you hold, accelerating your progression towards those dear Beasts you are a proud owner of. 🐯Beast Merge: Every time you roll the same Beast you had already unlocked, that Beasts Merge lvl will increase. This adds a lot to the game in the form of Progression and meta shifts, you wont see everyone using the same Beasts all the time. 🫂 Referrals: The Referral Leaderboard for 1% of the token Supply will continue accumulating this season. Qualified Referrals will give you a revenue share % out of the purchases your referrals make this BB season. We will soon share the Referral Leaderboard more transparently. 🫡 PAYING DEBTS: Before we launch Brawl, we will take care of some existing debts and make some amendments to areas that require it. I can announce the following now: - Correction to the allocation to top spots in BB S1 (increasing their amounts) - Releasing the Armored Beast to those with Qualified Referrals - Wilds VIP KURO Allocation will be increased. We will increase the amount ALL Wilds VIP users obtained by a considerable %. We think they deserve more. - Origin and Gen2 Buy Backs: We will periodically be using some funds to buy back Origin and Gen2 Beasts, we won't announce previously when we do it, only after the fact. These will either be stored away for a long time or burned. More news coming soon with exciting updates to Wilds, Partnerships, Ancients, and TGE, which is scheduled to happen this year and might surprise you. A Brawl Game Guide and exact date will be shared soon. Thanks for your attention.

kuroro beasts

43,537 views • 1 year ago

I cut the ending of Blake stream from last night because what he says about the 3.2GB UVU Review video needs to be heard — and questioned — by everyone following this case. The highest quality recording of the entire event. No independent investigator has the original file. And the metadata raises a question Blake didn't have a genuine answer for. *Let's start with the biggest problem.* On Blake's Mac, the file shows a date of September 9th. The Charlie Kirk event at UVU was September 10th. The video file is dated the day before the event it recorded. When Blake is asked about the Sept 9 date he says "this is the copy.. it was what I downloaded and copied into my iPhoto album." That's not an explanation for a file that predates the event. That's just describing what he did with it. He never gives reasonable explanation for the Sept 9 date. Keli Rabon asks the obvious question: "So, like why would it say Sept 9 is what they are asking?". A commenter originally asked about the date which is seen in the video below. Blake's response: "I have no idea." "I have no idea" is not acceptable when you're the sole custodian of the highest quality recording in a capital murder case. That metadata anomaly can be examined and potentially explained — but only with access to the original 3.2GB file. Which no independent investigator has. Blake claims he "released" the video on X back on November 5th. Technically true. What he released was a version he edited, watermarked, and uploaded to X — which compresses everything. The result? The public got files in the range of 15MB to 600MB. The original is 3.2GB. That's not a release. That's a fraction of the data. For forensic work — acoustic, ballistic, visual — compression destroys exactly the information that matters. Frame-level detail, audio fidelity, embedded metadata. All of it degraded or stripped. His defense: he's not a professional video editor and didn't realize that editing, watermarking, and uploading to social media would degrade the quality. You don't need to be a professional to understand that a 3.2GB file doesn't come out the other end at 15MB without losing almost everything. It gets stranger. Elizabeth from UVU Review contacted Blake and asked him to take the video down. He posted screenshots of that conversation on X. So there's a documented chain of custody complication — UVU Review wants it pulled, Blake had the file, and nobody doing forensic analysis has the original. When pressed on why he won't just release the 3.2GB file, Blake tells people to contact Elizabeth at UVU Review directly. He has the file. He chose to edit it, watermark it, compress it, and upload the degraded version. Now he's redirecting responsibility to someone who asked him to take it down. Then there's the "metadata verification". midGray on X who has been inactive in the investigation for months, supposedly examined the file and concluded there was no intentional tampering. He pulls the video midGRAY made in an attempt to validate himself. Blake says midGray worked from files downloaded from X but also contradicts himself by showing midGRAY also says Blake sent him the original file for which he has screenshots of metadata and was able to examine in hand. Watch the end of this stream. Keli Rabon starts asking the right questions — pointed, specific, reasonable — and Blake visibly checks out. Stops engaging. Gets uncomfortable. That's not what confidence in your own position looks like. This isn't about accusing Blake of anything nefarious, although it is very strange. It's about a simple principle: If you possess the highest quality recording of a capital murder case, and the metadata shows a date that predates the event, and investigators are asking for the original file — you release it. You don't compress it, watermark it, and tell people to ask someone else. Why not just release the original file for investigators to examine Blake ?

Troof

46,336 views • 6 months ago