Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

#bearstack: we bare bears teaser bumper - cartoon network (2015) song: "class historian" by BRONCHO

59,030 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

HOLLYWOOD CARTOON MADE FOR KIDS THREW IN YOUR CHILD’S FACE THAT ELITES & THE CIA WERE TRAFFICKING CHILDREN TO “EVIL SECRET ISLANDS” LIKE JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S! Hollywood has been throwing in our face for years that elite pedophiles like Jeffrey Epstein are trafficking children in tandem with intelligence agencies like the CIA - that YOU pay for! They not only did this in entertainment meant for adults, they flaunted it in cartoons that are geared toward children. This should enrage every single American! In 2005, the Cartoon Network ran an episode of the kid’s show Johnny Test featuring a helicopter named CIA Pizza — pizza is a pedophile code word that has been confirmed by the FBI, DOJ records, local law enforcement, the Wall Street Journal and many other sources — with the slogan “We Deliver To Evil Secret Islands”. This cartoon ran at the same time when we know Epstein was not only trafficking kids to his island, he also had many connections to the CIA and was most likely working with them! 1. Epstein met with Joe Biden’s current CIA Chief, William Burns, after his first child sex crime convictions. 2. When Epstein was serving his first jail sentence for child sex crimes, his bodyguard went to CIA headquarters for an alleged special training course. The CIA gave Epstein’s bodyguard a book with a secret message to deliver to Epstein. 3. Ghislaine Maxwell had a helicopter and submarine license. Maxwell transported trafficking victims to Epstein’s pedophile island via a helicopter he bought for her. So a cartoon meant for children, just happened to run an episode about delivering pizza aka trafficking children to secret evil islands that perfectly sums up the child sex trafficking operation Epstein & Maxwell were running. They’ve been throwing it in YOUR face and your children’s faces for years — including in the cartoons they watch that YOU thought were innocent. If this as a parent doesn’t enrage you, nothing will. Now is the time to say enough is enough & take action!
0:10

Sensitive content

HOLLYWOOD CARTOON MADE FOR KIDS THREW IN YOUR CHILD’S FACE THAT ELITES & THE CIA WERE TRAFFICKING CHILDREN TO “EVIL SECRET ISLANDS” LIKE JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S! Hollywood has been throwing in our face for years that elite pedophiles like Jeffrey Epstein are trafficking children in tandem with intelligence agencies like the CIA - that YOU pay for! They not only did this in entertainment meant for adults, they flaunted it in cartoons that are geared toward children. This should enrage every single American! In 2005, the Cartoon Network ran an episode of the kid’s show Johnny Test featuring a helicopter named CIA Pizza — pizza is a pedophile code word that has been confirmed by the FBI, DOJ records, local law enforcement, the Wall Street Journal and many other sources — with the slogan “We Deliver To Evil Secret Islands”. This cartoon ran at the same time when we know Epstein was not only trafficking kids to his island, he also had many connections to the CIA and was most likely working with them! 1. Epstein met with Joe Biden’s current CIA Chief, William Burns, after his first child sex crime convictions. 2. When Epstein was serving his first jail sentence for child sex crimes, his bodyguard went to CIA headquarters for an alleged special training course. The CIA gave Epstein’s bodyguard a book with a secret message to deliver to Epstein. 3. Ghislaine Maxwell had a helicopter and submarine license. Maxwell transported trafficking victims to Epstein’s pedophile island via a helicopter he bought for her. So a cartoon meant for children, just happened to run an episode about delivering pizza aka trafficking children to secret evil islands that perfectly sums up the child sex trafficking operation Epstein & Maxwell were running. They’ve been throwing it in YOUR face and your children’s faces for years — including in the cartoons they watch that YOU thought were innocent. If this as a parent doesn’t enrage you, nothing will. Now is the time to say enough is enough & take action!

LIZ CROKIN

4,587,216 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Say hello to Boojum 👋: zkSync Era’s new high-performance proof system for radical decentralization. Boojum is an upgrade that will transition zkSync Era to a STARK-powered proof system, providing world-class performance on consumer-grade hardware. 💡 Learn more: TL;DR 👇 Boojum is the name of our Rust-based cryptographic library, which we use to implement the upgraded version of the ZK circuits for zkSync Era and the ZK Stack. The name Boojum was inspired by Lewis Carroll's poem "The Hunting of the Snark," where the Boojum represents the most fearsome kind of Snark. We intentionally designed zkSync Era in a way that cryptographic upgrades can be made without a regenesis, meaning that the Boojum upgrade won’t cause any user disruptions. Why Boojum❓ From day one, zkSync’s mission is to advance personal freedom for all — making digital self-ownership universally accessible by building a blockchain network that is trustless, secure, permissionless, affordable, easy to use, resilient and limitlessly scalable. Boojum plays an important role in advancing this mission by delivering: 1. World-class performance zkSync Era’s current SNARK-based proof system is effective today, but it won’t scale to the volume that we envision for hyperchains. zkSync Era’s sequencer can already process over 100 TPS; Boojum orders of magnitude improvements to performance complements this well. 2. Reduced hardware requirements for decentralization Our long-term goal is to enable user-powered, decentralized proof generation. Boojum represents a breakthrough in this direction — with the prover running on consumer-grade GPUs requiring only 16 GB GPU RAM. Boojum’s Journey to Mainnet 🚴🏽‍♀️ Boojum is now live on Mainnet, generating and verifying ‘shadow proofs’ today with real production data so that we can carefully test the system ahead of fully migrating. Today, we’re also open-sourcing the repo; if you’d like to take a look, you can find it here 👇 This is the first of a series of posts on Boojum. We will provide updates on our progress, including more details on implementation, security, and performance. Watch here for more, anon ∎

ZKsync

828,318 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

🚨NYC CONQUERED: NO PLANES. NO EXPLOSIONS. JUST SURRENDER New York State is lighting 16 buildings green in recognition of Muslim American Heritage Month. Governor Hochul issued a proclamation. It’s the first time New York has officially done this. HERITAGE?” - LET’S BE HONEST What exactly is the “heritage” being honored? How about instead of lighting buildings green, we honor the Americans murdered in 16 Islamic terror attacks carried out on U.S. soil by jihadists? 1. Islamic Terror Attack: World Trade Center Bombing — New York City (1993) 2. Islamic Jihad Terror Attacks: September 11 — New York, Virginia, Pennsylvania (2001) 3. Islamic Jihad Terror Plot: Shoe Bomber Attack — U.S.-Bound Flight (2001) 4. Islamic Terror Attack: Los Angeles International Airport Shooting — California (2002) 5. Islamic Jihad Terror Attack: Fort Hood Massacre — Texas (2009) 6. Islamic Jihad Terror Plot: NYC Subway Bombing — New York (2009) 7. Islamic Terror Attack: Times Square Car Bomb Attempt — New York (2010) 8. Islamic Jihad Terror Plot: Portland Christmas Tree Bomb — Oregon (2010) 9. Islamic Terror Attack: Boston Marathon Bombing — Massachusetts (2013) 10. Islamic Jihad Terror Attack: Chattanooga Military Facility Shooting — Tennessee (2015) 11. Islamic Jihad Terror Attack: Garland Muhammad Cartoon Attack — Texas (2015) 12. Islamic Terror Attack: San Bernardino Christmas Massacre — California (2015) 13. Islamic Jihad Terror Attack: Orlando Pulse Nightclub Massacre — Florida (2016) 14. Islamic Jihad Terror Attack: Ohio State University Vehicle & Stabbing Attack — Ohio (2016) 15. Islamic Jihad Terror Attack: West Side Highway Truck Massacre — New York City (2017) 16. Islamic Jihad Terror Attack: Naval Air Station Pensacola Shooting — Florida (2019) Sixteen buildings lit green to celebrate “heritage.” Sixteen jihad attacks that took American lives. Message received, Governor Hochul: You’d rather honor the ideology that killed us than the memory of those it murdered. New York has surrendered.

Amy Mek

1,289,117 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Transformer and Mixture of Experts, explained visually! Mixture of Experts (MoE) is a popular architecture that uses different experts to improve Transformer models. Transformer and MoE differ in the decoder block: - Transformer uses a feed-forward network. - MoE uses experts, which are feed-forward networks but smaller compared to those Transformer. During inference, a subset of experts are selected. This makes inference faster in MoE. Also, since the network has multiple decoder layers: - The text passes through different experts across layers. - The chosen experts also differ between tokens. But how does the model decide which experts should be ideal? The router does that. It is a multi-class classifier that produces softmax scores over experts to select the top K experts. The router is trained with the network, and it learns to select the best experts. But it isn't straightforward. There are challenges! Challenge 1) Notice this pattern at the start of training: - Say, the model selects "Expert 2" - This expert gets a bit better - It may get selected again since it's the "best" - It learns more - It gets selected again in the next iteration - It learns more, and so on! This means many experts can go under-trained due to the overselection of a few experts! We solve this in two steps: - Add noise to the feed-forward output of the router so that other experts can get higher logits. - Set all but the top K logits to -infinity. After softmax, these scores become zero. This way, other experts also get the opportunity to train. Challenge 2) Some experts may get exposed to more tokens than others, leading to under-trained experts. We prevent this by limiting the number of tokens an expert can process. If an expert reaches the limit, the token is passed to the next best expert. Overall, MoEs have more parameters to load. But a fraction of them are activated during inference. This leads to faster inference. Mixtral 8x7B and Llama 4 are two popular MoE-based LLMs. Have you used MoEs in production yet? To dive deeper into how MoE inference works in production, we wrote a full article covering token dispatch, grouped expert computation, model-weight memory, multi-GPU communication, expert placement, load imbalance, and performance diagnosis. Read it below.

Daily Dose of Data Science

55,212 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

I would like to explain the latest batch of viral videos I'm working on to the bemused brainrot-curious reader who is not familiar with "the culture". Why are these characters, mixed with this song, going viral? It's all about connecting infinite referential mirrors. What makes this video interesting are not its individual parts but the signifier links it draws. Let's look at the individual parts: ONE: The song is a Brazilian funk or "pancadão" song called MC Lan e MC WM - Sua Amiga Vou Pegar, these days part of what's broadly referred as Brazilian phonk or just phonk (not to be confused with the original phonk, a Memphis-derived genre from the early 2010s built around chopped Three 6 Mafia samples, cowbells and lo-fi tape hiss and etc. The Brazilian version comes an entirely different lineage and got its name adapted from “funk” to “phonk” exclusively because the names sounded similar. It has a similarly menacing posture but swaps the rap cadence for funk's 4/4 with kicks on 1 and 3 rhythm and a much heavier, distorted 808 synth sound). Phonk is often used for its exaggerated reverb feeling bass lines to signify power, style or simply "aura", which you can take as a shorthand for poise, coolness, being de-bon-air and a general detached positive feeling of high status. Aura. Because most users cannot understand the Portuguese lyrics (which are often quite vulgar and sexual), the singing takes the characteristic of a chant, something to be appreciated entirely for its sound, texture and gravitas. The vocals are just another instrument where you can appreciate the menace and swagger of the delivery directly without the cognitive friction of meaning. Non-Portuguese-speaking audiences are not missing anything they were supposed to get, they get “the vibe” that matters, which is not lyrical. These songs are often paired with (male) characters that are taken to display these traits like American Psycho's Patrick Bateman (yes, yes I know that’s the opposite of what you should feel about the character), Peaky Blinder's Thomas Shelby and a menagerie of anime characters like Satoru Gojo (Jujutsu Kaisen), Yujiro Hanma (Baki) and Goku and, really, any male character that is just a little bit cool. TWO: The man in the suit is a minor Family Guy character called Tom Tucker. The reference comes from a scene where Meg sees him walking through her school and says "It's Tom Tucker from the news!” We then cut to her POV, where he is walking in slow motion with soft romantic music swelling and birds chirping, the whole love-at-first-sight trope. Then a camera crew member off-screen yells "hurry up Mr. Tucker," and we get to see he is not walking in slow motion because Meg is infatuated, he is just walking that slowly in real life. Only the music and the birds were in her head. The gag is built on the viewer recognizing the romantic-slow-motion trope, briefly accepting it as the scene's reality, and then being shown that we (and Meg) projected the trope onto what is actually just a man walking very slowly. HA! The original gag is already about projection: a neutral image (slow walk) being assigned an external meaning (romance) by a viewer's pattern-recognition. This is what makes the edit-culture appropriation work so well. The clip got stripped of its context, paired with phonk and text overlays (AURA or “Me and the boys going to detention”), and retroactively assigned a new meaning, only this time it’s the cinematic nonchalant walk, the slow deliberate gait that signifies a man who knows he's the most important thing in the frame (ta la any 1980s Schwazerneggerian action movie hero walking away from an explosion without looking back, every yakuza boss entering a room, every western gunslinger approaching the duel). The edit is ostensibly projecting a trope onto a neutral image. The first projection was romance; the second projection is aura. Family Guy clips and gifs are easy to access and repost, which makes it a readily available and easy to use building block. The show has, through sheer volume of output and over two decades of YouTube and cable TV saturation, become a kind of public-domain visual library, a default vocabulary that any editor can pull from knowing the audience will recognize the source without having to be told, and we can just keep loading meaning onto it. THREE: The character in the background is Tom, from Tom and Jerry, doing a pose made famous by an iShowSpeed fan who encountered him during a livestream. By quickly and correctly identifying Speed by his full legal name ("Darren Jason Watkins Jr"), she showcased herself to be a true fan, which he responded to with his characteristic exaggerated reactions. The pose the girl hit, with the knowing look to the camera, produced a perfect “aura moment” complete commitment, zero irony, the unshakeable conviction that what she was doing was the coolest possible thing to do. As a result, the clip then got endlessly edited with "aura 🥶🥶🥶" captions to canonize it. Aura, in this lexicon, is not granted by the universe; it is summoned by the person's own belief that they have it and by displaying the correct attitude. Tom is also dressed as the previously mentioned Thomas Shelby from Peaky Blinders, which is itself a double signifier. The name match (“Thomas”, get it?) and the suit-and-flat-cap costume turn the cartoon cat into a stand-in for the perhaps most used "high-aura" male character of the past decade, the brooding gangster patriarch whose every cigarette drag has been set to phonk, cinematic scores and electronic music a thousand times over. On top of that, he is made entirely out of chrome, a popular trope of asking ChatGPT (one of the few AI tools people have easy and broad access to) to render things out of very high quality materials to indicate "rarity" or "status" like diamonds, platinum and etc. A sign that itself descends from a longer lineage of in-game cosmetic rarity tiers (League of Legends, MMOs, various skin economy freemium game, the Fortnite battle pass, the Pokémon shiny, dacha games and etc) where material finish is the visual shorthand of value. So "chrome" or "platinum" Tom on top of all previous signifiers signals a “maximized” or “maxxd” version. The image is suppose to invoke the superlative highest possible tier, rarest-drop, legendary-rarity version of aura, the way a kid in a playground would describe their dad as not just strong but the strongest in the world. FOUR: Finally, the background black hole calls back to the original Tom image, where he is surrounded by the universe itself, having ascended. The character has transcended the diegetic frame of his own cartoon and now exists at a cosmological scale, with the black hole standing in for the kind of unmotivated, vibes-based "cosmic" imagery that has become the default background for any video trying to signify that something Big is happening (the same visual motif that has powered comic book characters, anime transformations, video game power ups and anything wants to feel grandiose or “epic” without specifying what about). The black hole means significance in the abstract. At this point I think you understand the mechanism at play here. None of these references resolve to a stable meaning on their own. Tom Tucker is “cool” only in the very short context in which his image served as a substrate; he was convenient footage to pair with a song, and the absurdity of doing an "aura edit" on such a minor, strange character scene makes it all funnier and easier to share. Tom-the-cat is doing the aura pose > the aura pose comes from the iShowSpeed girl > the iShowSpeed girl was cool because she correctly played her part in an established bit of a large streamer with the correct timing and theatrical flair > the bit was cool because it was a shared convention unified by a popular central streamer figure > the convention existed because phonk edits had already trained this exact scenario to be read as confidence-plus-detachment as aura > the chrome finish points to AI image generation quirks > the AI image generation style can be mapped to gaming visual rarity shorthands; the gaming rarity tiers point to a much older logic of precious-metal-as-status. Each step on the referential chain is propped by the one behind it, and the one behind it is propped up by the one behind that, so on and so forth. There is no natural endpoint, the entire structure functions more akin to a network than a linked list. If you stop at any single point and ask "but why is particular signifier cool or funny or interesting”, the answer is always "because of the thing behind it.” It’s hyper-citation, Here, what matters is the structure of the whole rather than the content. This is structure is what I mean by infinite referential mirrors. The rate at which a concept is referencing, remixing and calling back to another is what’s interesting. In other words, It’s the velocity that matters. The chain of recognitions, each "I get that reference," and the cumulative effect of getting six references stacked on top of each other a short span of time gives you the feeling that you are participating in something dense and alive, because it allows you to recognize the shared meme ecosystem of the platform that you are participating in, even if only a glimpse of it. You are inside the culture rather than outside it. The brainrot-curious reader who watches this video and feels nothing, has “failed” to understand the joke because they are outside the hall of mirrors I am describing. You can only get the magic if you step in and start counting the reflections: the song, the suit, the cat, the chrome, the black hole, the transitions the video uses. You are looking at connected parts of this network of symbols and at the speed at which one image hands you off to the next. The entire thirteen-second clip is functioning as a single compressed referential payload that decompresses in the viewer's head into a small private essay exactly like this one. The video allows you to recognize yourself as someone capable of decoding it, and that recognition is the reward. That’s why media like this goes viral.

Pleometric

70,884 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

2. Teasers / MV / Live presentations We believe all the content should include all members. Not some content, but all of it. We see some people excusing the exclusion of Lee Know in some content because "he will appear in other content", we don't understand why he would be excluded out of any content when the group includes 8 members. There isn't an excuse for this to happen all the time. We will only talk about recent releases and God's Menu to not make this even longer. a) Gods Menu - A title track where they gave him zero lines and screen time (song that they continue to sing, so the company could have made a redistribution of the lines). b) Megaverse - They gave him lines in the initial release, but then they cut his part to 3 seconds, and decided to delete his center part leaving him with half of a line. c) Hall Of Fame - Every live presentation they would cut Lee Know on his own part recording from below all of the other members and only listening to Lee Know's voice without being able to look at him. d) S-Class - They stopped recording the kick he does and instead they record the other members, Lee Know sings there. e) JJAM - When it was dance racha time, Lee Know got almost no time, during the life presentation the moment he goes to the center he says his line "I know..." and while he says it, the screen gets black, so he doesn't have that time on screen, later he is placed at the back covered during the dance break. He is the dance leader. f) Walkin on Water' - During the live presentation, they decided to record everyone on his part, and cut it from his own fancam. g) Recent teasers - He was completely excluded from the first teaser and only included in the second one, he got no solo recording on the MV like the other members. h) Giant - There is a part on the video where all the members are shown, Lee Know is covered and the lights are lowered where he is, making him invisible. During the live presentation, they record other members on his part, they put the dance focus on others, being the only part he has where he sings alone. i) YOUTH - After the release of the MV, the company decided to edit the video causing views to freeze and deleting a very important part where it thanked the people involved. The time from when the video was finished to when it was published was enough to arrange all the details, and the part deleted was so big, it was impossible to miss it. This happened before with his other individual work “Dawn”, which was deleted after some time, and re-uploaded, deleting all the views it had accumulated. This means one of two things, the company puts less interest and effort in Lee Know's work, or the company is purposefully hindering Lee Know's work. Either of the two is unacceptable by a company with so many resources and that claims to be a leader in the industry. This only shows a lack of professionalism and care. j) Dance leader - We know he is the dance leader, and K-stays and the members have talked a lot about how involved he is and how hard he works in that position, but the company refuses to include any footage of him doing it, and even cuts the parts where he gives his all. Just recently K-Stays were raving about how hard Lee Know worked as the dance leader and how much effort it took, One Label cut all of that footage from the Talker. It appears they don't want stays to look at anything he does, or to not give him recognition for anything.

LEE KNOW 리노 GLOBAL ★

21,011 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr