Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Because 40,000 rabbis converting half a billion Muslims would take ten millennia, and Israel already made plans with democracy, it had to cancel its date with Greater Israel. Accordingly, in land for peace it gave up territory it seized in ‘73 that put it a stone throw from the...

DanLinnaeus's profile picture

dan linnaeus

26,284 subscribers

16,440 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNachrichten & PolitikBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🎯"The Nakba, the ethnic cleansing, the genocide- all these types of allegations are the failing attempt of the loser that wants to turn defeat into something else." 🎯"They call it a Nakba. It's a disaster- but who's responsible for the disaster? Was it the Arab miscalculation when Israel was extremely outnumbered, and they came with this inflated Arabian ego?" 🎯"Hundreds of thousands of Arabs left their farms because the Arab armies told them they must evacuate and after we cleanse the land of Jews, you can return to your homes." 🎯"Who's responsible for that? In my opinion, the Arab arrogance." UC Berkeley hosted Marc Lamont Hill and @MosabHasanYOSEF for an incredible debate about Jews and Arabs in Israel and the Middle East. In this clip, they were asked about the so-called "Nakba" and who was responsible for it. Mr. Yosef's response is a must-watch! ⬇️ Full interview:
3:54

🎯"The Nakba, the ethnic cleansing, the genocide- all these types of allegations are the failing attempt of the loser that wants to turn defeat into something else." 🎯"They call it a Nakba. It's a disaster- but who's responsible for the disaster? Was it the Arab miscalculation when Israel was extremely outnumbered, and they came with this inflated Arabian ego?" 🎯"Hundreds of thousands of Arabs left their farms because the Arab armies told them they must evacuate and after we cleanse the land of Jews, you can return to your homes." 🎯"Who's responsible for that? In my opinion, the Arab arrogance." UC Berkeley hosted Marc Lamont Hill and @MosabHasanYOSEF for an incredible debate about Jews and Arabs in Israel and the Middle East. In this clip, they were asked about the so-called "Nakba" and who was responsible for it. Mr. Yosef's response is a must-watch! ⬇️ Full interview:

Etana Hecht 🇮🇱 🇺🇸

141,075 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The Jews lived in the Holy Land for centuries, even before the Romans named the land “Palestina.” During the Ottoman occupation, Jews lived legally in Jerusalem and major cities in the Old Yishuv. Ottoman Jews were there long before the rise of the Zionist movement in Europe. Even during the British colonial rule, a.k.a. the British Mandate of Palestine, which started in 1917, the Jewish community prospered. Jews bought land legally and turned the desert into a paradise. When Britain returned the mandate to the UN, the Jews accepted the partition plan and agreed to establish a Jewish state next to an Arab state and live in peace with their Arab neighbors. But the Arab Muslims rejected it and repeatedly started wars to destroy the State of Israel and ethnically cleanse the Jews. They lost all the wars they started. Somehow, they managed to convince people in the West that Jews are “illegals” in the Land of Israel and that Israel has no right to exist. This is the big lie. Please share to destroy their false narrative.
0:48

The Jews lived in the Holy Land for centuries, even before the Romans named the land “Palestina.” During the Ottoman occupation, Jews lived legally in Jerusalem and major cities in the Old Yishuv. Ottoman Jews were there long before the rise of the Zionist movement in Europe. Even during the British colonial rule, a.k.a. the British Mandate of Palestine, which started in 1917, the Jewish community prospered. Jews bought land legally and turned the desert into a paradise. When Britain returned the mandate to the UN, the Jews accepted the partition plan and agreed to establish a Jewish state next to an Arab state and live in peace with their Arab neighbors. But the Arab Muslims rejected it and repeatedly started wars to destroy the State of Israel and ethnically cleanse the Jews. They lost all the wars they started. Somehow, they managed to convince people in the West that Jews are “illegals” in the Land of Israel and that Israel has no right to exist. This is the big lie. Please share to destroy their false narrative.

Liza Rosen

29,278 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

"Ongoing" - One of the phrases increasingly used next to the term "Nakba" is "Ongoing" as in the recent proposal by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib. Now westerners assume that the "ongoing" seeks to highlight continued suffering of Palestinian Arabs, but as with so many other phrases that serve as "dual use language" (as Eran Shayshon coined) is that the deep meaning is very different. Once it is known and understood that the real time meaning of the Nakba, as described by Constantin Zureiq as "Seven Arab states declare war in an attempt to subdue Zionism, stop impotent before it, and return on their heels" was the shameful failure to defeat the lowly Jews in war - it becomes crystal clear why it remains "ongoing": As long as Israel exists, the Arab, and especially Palestinian Arab shameful failure to dismantle Jewish sovereignty and "subdue Zionism" remains "ongoing". As long as, per Bevin's quote, the top goal of the Palestine Arabs "to resist to the last the establishment of Jewish sovereignty in any part of the land" remains unfulfilled, their definition of disaster remains "ongoing". In the updated book of The War of Return, "October Return", Dr. Adi Schwartz and I included a dictionary of sort to explore this dual use language. I share it here with you: "This becomes especially clear when analyzing the language of Palestinian identity and that of its supporters around the world. Terms such as “two states,” “justice,” “return,” and “rights” carry one meaning in dialogue between Palestinians and Westerners or Israelis—but an entirely different meaning within internal Palestinian discourse. "Take “two states,” for example. During the years of negotiations, Palestinian leaders—and many surveys—expressed support for the “two-state solution.” Israelis and Westerners reasonably assumed that this meant one state for Palestinian Arabs and one for Jews. In retrospect, we should have checked. For when Palestinians speak of “two states,” they also maintain that millions of Palestinian “refugees” have a right to settle inside Israel. The implication is that the phrase “two states” actually means a Palestinian Arab state in the West Bank and Gaza, alongside a second Arab-majority state that replaces Israel via the mass return of refugees. In effect: “this one is ours, and that one is also ours.” "To this day, no official Palestinian peace plan includes the recognition of a Jewish state on any part of the land between the river and the sea. "It is also worth examining the meaning of a word like “justice”—so frequently invoked in phrases like “a just peace,” “a just solution,” or in the names of organizations such as “Students for Justice in Palestine.” To many in the world, “justice” may simply mean that Palestinians should have a state of their own, or that Israel should not control their daily lives. That is a reasonable interpretation. But it is not the Palestinian one. "For Palestinians, there is only one concept of justice: the reversal of the injustice they associate with the creation of the State of Israel. And central to that “corrective justice” is return—which, by definition, entails the end of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people. "The same applies to words like “rights,” “liberation,” and, of course, “return.” As will become clear in the pages ahead, there is no ambiguity: “return” is the concept that embodies victory over the Jewish state and its elimination. "That is why the butcherty of October 7 was greeted with euphoria."
1:55

"Ongoing" - One of the phrases increasingly used next to the term "Nakba" is "Ongoing" as in the recent proposal by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib. Now westerners assume that the "ongoing" seeks to highlight continued suffering of Palestinian Arabs, but as with so many other phrases that serve as "dual use language" (as Eran Shayshon coined) is that the deep meaning is very different. Once it is known and understood that the real time meaning of the Nakba, as described by Constantin Zureiq as "Seven Arab states declare war in an attempt to subdue Zionism, stop impotent before it, and return on their heels" was the shameful failure to defeat the lowly Jews in war - it becomes crystal clear why it remains "ongoing": As long as Israel exists, the Arab, and especially Palestinian Arab shameful failure to dismantle Jewish sovereignty and "subdue Zionism" remains "ongoing". As long as, per Bevin's quote, the top goal of the Palestine Arabs "to resist to the last the establishment of Jewish sovereignty in any part of the land" remains unfulfilled, their definition of disaster remains "ongoing". In the updated book of The War of Return, "October Return", Dr. Adi Schwartz and I included a dictionary of sort to explore this dual use language. I share it here with you: "This becomes especially clear when analyzing the language of Palestinian identity and that of its supporters around the world. Terms such as “two states,” “justice,” “return,” and “rights” carry one meaning in dialogue between Palestinians and Westerners or Israelis—but an entirely different meaning within internal Palestinian discourse. "Take “two states,” for example. During the years of negotiations, Palestinian leaders—and many surveys—expressed support for the “two-state solution.” Israelis and Westerners reasonably assumed that this meant one state for Palestinian Arabs and one for Jews. In retrospect, we should have checked. For when Palestinians speak of “two states,” they also maintain that millions of Palestinian “refugees” have a right to settle inside Israel. The implication is that the phrase “two states” actually means a Palestinian Arab state in the West Bank and Gaza, alongside a second Arab-majority state that replaces Israel via the mass return of refugees. In effect: “this one is ours, and that one is also ours.” "To this day, no official Palestinian peace plan includes the recognition of a Jewish state on any part of the land between the river and the sea. "It is also worth examining the meaning of a word like “justice”—so frequently invoked in phrases like “a just peace,” “a just solution,” or in the names of organizations such as “Students for Justice in Palestine.” To many in the world, “justice” may simply mean that Palestinians should have a state of their own, or that Israel should not control their daily lives. That is a reasonable interpretation. But it is not the Palestinian one. "For Palestinians, there is only one concept of justice: the reversal of the injustice they associate with the creation of the State of Israel. And central to that “corrective justice” is return—which, by definition, entails the end of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people. "The same applies to words like “rights,” “liberation,” and, of course, “return.” As will become clear in the pages ahead, there is no ambiguity: “return” is the concept that embodies victory over the Jewish state and its elimination. "That is why the butcherty of October 7 was greeted with euphoria."

ד״ר עינת וילף Dr. Einat Wilf

83,590 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Very few people take the time to actually research the history of Israel, yet they are quick to make claims such as "the Jewish people stole the land." For these people, here is a history lesson and an attached video: Late 19th and Early 20th Century: The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw increased legal Jewish immigration to the region referred to by many as Palestine, which was then land that was part of the Ottoman Empire. This immigration was driven by various factors, including the desire for a Jewish homeland. The Jewish people who immigrated legally obtained the land through various means, including: Via purchase, via donations from Jewish philanthropists, via land reclamation of uncultivated land, through agricultural communities (known as Kibbutzim), or through obtaining public lan. Many Jewish people already owned land within the Ottoman Empire when it collapsed. World War I: During World War I, in 1917, the British Empire and Allied forces captured Palestine from the Ottoman Empire in 1917. Balfour Declaration (1917): In 1917, the British government, who had captured the land, issued the Balfour Declaration, that showed support for the creation of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine. British Mandate (1920-1948): After World War I, the League of Nations granted Britain a mandate over Palestine. During this period, legal Jewish immigration to Palestine increased even more. 1947 UN Partition Plan: In 1947, after tensions began rising between Arabs and Jews in the region, the United Nations proposed a plan to partition Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states. The plan was accepted by Jewish leaders but rejected by Arab leaders. 1948 Arab-Israeli War: The end of the British Mandate for Palestine in 1948 marked the declaration of the State of Israel. The neighboring Arab states initiated a military conflict with Israel, resulting in the displacement of many Palestinians from their homes. It was the Arab states, not Israel that launched this war, after the land was divided up. The 1948 Arab-Israeli War, known as the Nakba, led to the displacement and expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Palestinian Arabs from their land. Many became refugees, and some sought refuge in neighboring Arab countries. Resulting Borders: The war's outcome, including armistice agreements in 1949, resulted in new borders and territories. Israel controlled a larger portion of Palestine than had been proposed in the UN partition plan after they obtain much of this land in the War that was started by the Arabs. Subsequent Conflicts and Developments: Over the years, additional conflicts and wars, such as the Six-Day War in 1967, led to further territorial changes and disputes between Israel and its neighbors. Additionally, here are parts of a video created by Francisco Gil-White, an anthropologist.
8:23

Very few people take the time to actually research the history of Israel, yet they are quick to make claims such as "the Jewish people stole the land." For these people, here is a history lesson and an attached video: Late 19th and Early 20th Century: The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw increased legal Jewish immigration to the region referred to by many as Palestine, which was then land that was part of the Ottoman Empire. This immigration was driven by various factors, including the desire for a Jewish homeland. The Jewish people who immigrated legally obtained the land through various means, including: Via purchase, via donations from Jewish philanthropists, via land reclamation of uncultivated land, through agricultural communities (known as Kibbutzim), or through obtaining public lan. Many Jewish people already owned land within the Ottoman Empire when it collapsed. World War I: During World War I, in 1917, the British Empire and Allied forces captured Palestine from the Ottoman Empire in 1917. Balfour Declaration (1917): In 1917, the British government, who had captured the land, issued the Balfour Declaration, that showed support for the creation of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine. British Mandate (1920-1948): After World War I, the League of Nations granted Britain a mandate over Palestine. During this period, legal Jewish immigration to Palestine increased even more. 1947 UN Partition Plan: In 1947, after tensions began rising between Arabs and Jews in the region, the United Nations proposed a plan to partition Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states. The plan was accepted by Jewish leaders but rejected by Arab leaders. 1948 Arab-Israeli War: The end of the British Mandate for Palestine in 1948 marked the declaration of the State of Israel. The neighboring Arab states initiated a military conflict with Israel, resulting in the displacement of many Palestinians from their homes. It was the Arab states, not Israel that launched this war, after the land was divided up. The 1948 Arab-Israeli War, known as the Nakba, led to the displacement and expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Palestinian Arabs from their land. Many became refugees, and some sought refuge in neighboring Arab countries. Resulting Borders: The war's outcome, including armistice agreements in 1949, resulted in new borders and territories. Israel controlled a larger portion of Palestine than had been proposed in the UN partition plan after they obtain much of this land in the War that was started by the Arabs. Subsequent Conflicts and Developments: Over the years, additional conflicts and wars, such as the Six-Day War in 1967, led to further territorial changes and disputes between Israel and its neighbors. Additionally, here are parts of a video created by Francisco Gil-White, an anthropologist.

Ed Krassenstein

2,459,521 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Top British attorney Natasha Hausdorff stunned the audience by completely destroying the Palestinian narrative about the conflict. Palestine never existed as a sovereign Arab state. The British Mandate of Palestine was a British regime that gained control of the land of Israel due to the fall of the Ottoman Empire after 1917. Jews lived in the Holy Land (ie, the Old Yishuv) for centuries. Including under the control of the Ottoman Empire, when Jews were the majority of residents in Jerusalem. Before 1909, Tel Aviv was a desert land. The empty land was bought legally by the Jews who turned it over the years into a prosperous city. Not a single Arab was thrown out of his home or cave by the Jews, who again, bought desert lands in the Land of Israel legally and built the kibbutzim (agricultural towns). After the British government turned the mandate back to the U.N., the Arab-Muslim world rejected the UN partition plan and declared war not only against Israel, but also against their own Jewish population. The Arab states ethnically cleansed most of their Jewish population. Most of the Jewish refugees moved to Israel where the armies of Jordan, Syria, Iraq and Egypt joined forces and declared war along with the local Arab population with the public goal of "pushing all the Jews into the sea". During the war of independence the Arab armies who started this war, ordered the local Arabs to leave the combat zones and allow them to annihilate the Jews living there. Some Arabs were also forcibly evacuated during the fighting and moved to nearby territories under the control of Egypt and Jordan (Gaza and the West Bank). Israel has never committed and never will commit genocide. In fact by defending itself Israel is preventing another genocide of Jews. Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran’s regime are the obstacles to peace in the Middle East! Please retweet this post and follow me if you support Israel’s right to exist and its right to defend itself 🙏
4:07

Top British attorney Natasha Hausdorff stunned the audience by completely destroying the Palestinian narrative about the conflict. Palestine never existed as a sovereign Arab state. The British Mandate of Palestine was a British regime that gained control of the land of Israel due to the fall of the Ottoman Empire after 1917. Jews lived in the Holy Land (ie, the Old Yishuv) for centuries. Including under the control of the Ottoman Empire, when Jews were the majority of residents in Jerusalem. Before 1909, Tel Aviv was a desert land. The empty land was bought legally by the Jews who turned it over the years into a prosperous city. Not a single Arab was thrown out of his home or cave by the Jews, who again, bought desert lands in the Land of Israel legally and built the kibbutzim (agricultural towns). After the British government turned the mandate back to the U.N., the Arab-Muslim world rejected the UN partition plan and declared war not only against Israel, but also against their own Jewish population. The Arab states ethnically cleansed most of their Jewish population. Most of the Jewish refugees moved to Israel where the armies of Jordan, Syria, Iraq and Egypt joined forces and declared war along with the local Arab population with the public goal of "pushing all the Jews into the sea". During the war of independence the Arab armies who started this war, ordered the local Arabs to leave the combat zones and allow them to annihilate the Jews living there. Some Arabs were also forcibly evacuated during the fighting and moved to nearby territories under the control of Egypt and Jordan (Gaza and the West Bank). Israel has never committed and never will commit genocide. In fact by defending itself Israel is preventing another genocide of Jews. Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran’s regime are the obstacles to peace in the Middle East! Please retweet this post and follow me if you support Israel’s right to exist and its right to defend itself 🙏

Liza Rosen

1,280,746 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

There was no such thing as Palestine in 1000 BC. In fact, "Palestine" is a word that's made up, and there is some suggestion that Herodotus used the term as a play on words in the Greek period to refer to the Philistine people. The Philistines, by the way, have nothing to do with modern Palestinians, modern Muslim Arabs. They are a non-Semitic people. They are an Indo-European people. They're a Greek people who spoke an Indo-European language, derivative of Greek, and who invaded, not just northern Egypt, but also southwestern Israel, the land we now know as Gaza, at around that time, about 1,000 years before the Romans arrived. The Philistines fought, and this plays out in the Bible, they fought many wars against their rivals. Not just on the western side with the Egyptians, but also on the eastern side with the Jews. And of course, the famous battle with Goliath and David is a battle between the Jews and the Philistines. The point is that by the time of the Greeks, the Philistines had already died out. And Herodotus was playfully making a play on words with the name Israel. The name Israel, as you know, is Hebrew for "He who wrestles with God." And so the Greek word, the ancient Greek word for wrestler, he who wrestles, is "Palaistine." And so since the Philistines were in that land, he had called it Palaistine as a play, a transliteration of the Jewish word or the Hebrew word Israel, He who wrestles with God. The word then disappears from the lexicon, and then there is the Roman conquest of Judea, the land of Israel. Judea, by the way, in Hebrew is just Yehudia. Jew is Yehudi. Yehudia is therefore land of the Jews, the place where the Jews are from. That's the land that the Romans conquered in 63 BC, and the Jews didn't like being conquered by the Romans for a variety of reasons, and they revolted three times. In the third and final revolt of 132 to 135 AD, which we know as the Bar Kokhba revolt, after its leader Simon Bar Kokhba, Simon being the name Shimon, an ancient Jewish name and the second tribe of Israel, but also Bar Kokhba meaning son of the star in Hebrew. In 135 AD, Hadrian, the emperor of Rome, says, "We're done with these Jews. They have rebelled not once, not twice, not three now three times. They do not accept our magnanimity. We have to wipe out any memory of the Jewish presence on this land." And so he does two big things. He first destroys Jerusalem, and he renames it. The Romans like to rename things in order to erase their history. So he changes the name from Yerushalayim, Jerusalem, to Aelia Capitolina. Aelia for his family, the Aelia clan from Spain, and Capitolina for Jupiter Capitolinus, who's the sky god of the Romans. And then he renames the land Judea after the Philistines again and calls it Palestina. And he did that both to punish the Jews and erase any connection between the Jews and their land, but also because he knew that if he named it after a people who had been dead and extinct in the archeological record for a thousand years, there was no risk that they would show up and say, "Hey, the land is our land. You named it after us." So it was a safe way to rename the land. He named it Palestina. I don't think he ever could have imagined just how brilliant the idea would play with young college students in American campuses 2,000 years later.
8:51

There was no such thing as Palestine in 1000 BC. In fact, "Palestine" is a word that's made up, and there is some suggestion that Herodotus used the term as a play on words in the Greek period to refer to the Philistine people. The Philistines, by the way, have nothing to do with modern Palestinians, modern Muslim Arabs. They are a non-Semitic people. They are an Indo-European people. They're a Greek people who spoke an Indo-European language, derivative of Greek, and who invaded, not just northern Egypt, but also southwestern Israel, the land we now know as Gaza, at around that time, about 1,000 years before the Romans arrived. The Philistines fought, and this plays out in the Bible, they fought many wars against their rivals. Not just on the western side with the Egyptians, but also on the eastern side with the Jews. And of course, the famous battle with Goliath and David is a battle between the Jews and the Philistines. The point is that by the time of the Greeks, the Philistines had already died out. And Herodotus was playfully making a play on words with the name Israel. The name Israel, as you know, is Hebrew for "He who wrestles with God." And so the Greek word, the ancient Greek word for wrestler, he who wrestles, is "Palaistine." And so since the Philistines were in that land, he had called it Palaistine as a play, a transliteration of the Jewish word or the Hebrew word Israel, He who wrestles with God. The word then disappears from the lexicon, and then there is the Roman conquest of Judea, the land of Israel. Judea, by the way, in Hebrew is just Yehudia. Jew is Yehudi. Yehudia is therefore land of the Jews, the place where the Jews are from. That's the land that the Romans conquered in 63 BC, and the Jews didn't like being conquered by the Romans for a variety of reasons, and they revolted three times. In the third and final revolt of 132 to 135 AD, which we know as the Bar Kokhba revolt, after its leader Simon Bar Kokhba, Simon being the name Shimon, an ancient Jewish name and the second tribe of Israel, but also Bar Kokhba meaning son of the star in Hebrew. In 135 AD, Hadrian, the emperor of Rome, says, "We're done with these Jews. They have rebelled not once, not twice, not three now three times. They do not accept our magnanimity. We have to wipe out any memory of the Jewish presence on this land." And so he does two big things. He first destroys Jerusalem, and he renames it. The Romans like to rename things in order to erase their history. So he changes the name from Yerushalayim, Jerusalem, to Aelia Capitolina. Aelia for his family, the Aelia clan from Spain, and Capitolina for Jupiter Capitolinus, who's the sky god of the Romans. And then he renames the land Judea after the Philistines again and calls it Palestina. And he did that both to punish the Jews and erase any connection between the Jews and their land, but also because he knew that if he named it after a people who had been dead and extinct in the archeological record for a thousand years, there was no risk that they would show up and say, "Hey, the land is our land. You named it after us." So it was a safe way to rename the land. He named it Palestina. I don't think he ever could have imagined just how brilliant the idea would play with young college students in American campuses 2,000 years later.

Roy K. Altman

28,424 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Shimon Peres on Face the Nation in 1975. “Many countries including even Syria and the Soviet Union, Egypt, Arab countries, European countries have suggested another way. They have said that if Israel says it will live within the borders of 1967 that is to say before the June war of 67, that then they will join in creating a system of peace in which Israel will get the protection of international acceptance. … let’s not forget that up to 67 Israel was within the 67 frontiers and yet we never had peace.”
1:33

Shimon Peres on Face the Nation in 1975. “Many countries including even Syria and the Soviet Union, Egypt, Arab countries, European countries have suggested another way. They have said that if Israel says it will live within the borders of 1967 that is to say before the June war of 67, that then they will join in creating a system of peace in which Israel will get the protection of international acceptance. … let’s not forget that up to 67 Israel was within the 67 frontiers and yet we never had peace.”

Mish

59,238 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Jews lived in the Holy Land for centuries before Romans renamed it “Palestina.” Under Ottomans, they resided legally in Jerusalem and major cities as part of the Old Yishuv, predating modern Zionism. After Britain took control in 1917, the Jewish community grew, bought land legally, and turned wasteland into thriving cities. When the mandate ended, Jews accepted the UN partition plan and were ready to live beside an Arab state in peace. Arab leadership rejected it, launched repeated wars to destroy Israel and ethnically cleanse Jews, and lost every one. Yet they convinced Western audiences that Jews are “illegals” in their own homeland. Watch this video: these so-called “pro-Palestinians” openly deny Israel’s right to exist. Hamas does the same while calling for genocide. This—not Israel—is the real obstacle to peace. Israel has offered a state repeatedly. It even left Gaza in 2005, only to receive terrorism, October 7th, and tens of thousands of rockets in return. Enough with the hypocrisy pushed by the left and Islamists in the West.
1:01

Jews lived in the Holy Land for centuries before Romans renamed it “Palestina.” Under Ottomans, they resided legally in Jerusalem and major cities as part of the Old Yishuv, predating modern Zionism. After Britain took control in 1917, the Jewish community grew, bought land legally, and turned wasteland into thriving cities. When the mandate ended, Jews accepted the UN partition plan and were ready to live beside an Arab state in peace. Arab leadership rejected it, launched repeated wars to destroy Israel and ethnically cleanse Jews, and lost every one. Yet they convinced Western audiences that Jews are “illegals” in their own homeland. Watch this video: these so-called “pro-Palestinians” openly deny Israel’s right to exist. Hamas does the same while calling for genocide. This—not Israel—is the real obstacle to peace. Israel has offered a state repeatedly. It even left Gaza in 2005, only to receive terrorism, October 7th, and tens of thousands of rockets in return. Enough with the hypocrisy pushed by the left and Islamists in the West.

Yossi BenYakar

60,356 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

I was asked by USA Today to respond to remarks made by Hasan Piker about Zionism. Piker claimed as follows: “Zionism is the ethnoreligious supremacist ideology that is exterminationist in principle, born out of the wrong assessment that this was a land without people for a people without land. It required the extermination of the indigenous population, and that's precisely what has happened since its inception. And its final iteration of that has been the Gaza genocide that we watched unfold.” You can call a blowtorch an avocado as many times as you want, but it still doesn’t have a seed, and it still isn’t green because it’s still just a blowtorch. The claim that Zionism is an exterminationist ideology is just as nonsensical as calling a blowtorch an avocado. The suggestion that Jews want to exterminate the Arabs who also live on the land is likewise, as it has always been, ludicrous and false. Zionism is a simple idea, which is that Jews have the same rights — not more rights, but also not fewer rights — than every other people on Earth have to sovereignty in their national homeland. So just as you might think that Bulgarians have the right to sovereignty in their homeland, Japanese people, Korean people, German people all have the right to sovereignty in their homeland, Zionism is just the idea that Jews should be treated the same. By the way, this is in the charter, the charter that is the foundation of the state of Israel. In that document, the word ‘extermination,’ of course, would never appear there, but anything that even remotely resembles that word or idea is foreign to any of the early laws or that document. In fact, the document says precisely the opposite. The document says that one of the purposes of the state of Israel is to allow Jews and Arabs alike to live in peace and to flourish together in the land of Israel. That's what the Declaration of Independence of the State of Israel says, and by the way, that's what the state of Israel has proven, more so than what it said in 1948, in the decades since.
2:18

I was asked by USA Today to respond to remarks made by Hasan Piker about Zionism. Piker claimed as follows: “Zionism is the ethnoreligious supremacist ideology that is exterminationist in principle, born out of the wrong assessment that this was a land without people for a people without land. It required the extermination of the indigenous population, and that's precisely what has happened since its inception. And its final iteration of that has been the Gaza genocide that we watched unfold.” You can call a blowtorch an avocado as many times as you want, but it still doesn’t have a seed, and it still isn’t green because it’s still just a blowtorch. The claim that Zionism is an exterminationist ideology is just as nonsensical as calling a blowtorch an avocado. The suggestion that Jews want to exterminate the Arabs who also live on the land is likewise, as it has always been, ludicrous and false. Zionism is a simple idea, which is that Jews have the same rights — not more rights, but also not fewer rights — than every other people on Earth have to sovereignty in their national homeland. So just as you might think that Bulgarians have the right to sovereignty in their homeland, Japanese people, Korean people, German people all have the right to sovereignty in their homeland, Zionism is just the idea that Jews should be treated the same. By the way, this is in the charter, the charter that is the foundation of the state of Israel. In that document, the word ‘extermination,’ of course, would never appear there, but anything that even remotely resembles that word or idea is foreign to any of the early laws or that document. In fact, the document says precisely the opposite. The document says that one of the purposes of the state of Israel is to allow Jews and Arabs alike to live in peace and to flourish together in the land of Israel. That's what the Declaration of Independence of the State of Israel says, and by the way, that's what the state of Israel has proven, more so than what it said in 1948, in the decades since.

Roy K. Altman

20,582 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

There are hundreds of thousands of Jews in the Holy Land who are against Israel and Zionism. Before Israel was established, Jews and Muslims lived in peace. All Jews in Israel are portrayed as pro-Israel and pro-Zionism. This is a big lie. The mainstream media does not show it, but there are hundreds of thousands of Jews against Zionism and they constantly live under the pressure of Zionists. They do not send their children to Zionist schools and never accept aid from the State of Israel.
0:47

There are hundreds of thousands of Jews in the Holy Land who are against Israel and Zionism. Before Israel was established, Jews and Muslims lived in peace. All Jews in Israel are portrayed as pro-Israel and pro-Zionism. This is a big lie. The mainstream media does not show it, but there are hundreds of thousands of Jews against Zionism and they constantly live under the pressure of Zionists. They do not send their children to Zionist schools and never accept aid from the State of Israel.

Voice of Rabbis

71,127 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 This debunks the entire Nakba narrative. On May 14, 1948, David Ben-Gurion stood up and read the Declaration of Independence of the State of Israel. Outside the hall, war was already underway. Arab militias had been attacking Jewish communities for months, and five Arab armies were preparing to invade. And in this part of the speech Ben-Gurion said to the Arabs: “We appeal in the very midst of the onslaught launched against us now for months, to the Arab inhabitants of the State of Israel to preserve peace and participate in the upbuilding of the State on the basis of full and equal citizenship and due representation in all its institutions.” It was said during the war itself. What this means •Arabs living in the territory were explicitly invited to stay •They were promised full and equal citizenship •Participation in the new state was offered from day one The idea that Arabs were collectively expelled as a founding policy collapses when confronted with Israel’s founding document read aloud, on camera, at the moment of statehood. History is complex. But some claims simply don’t survive the primary source. This clip is one of them.
1:01

🚨 This debunks the entire Nakba narrative. On May 14, 1948, David Ben-Gurion stood up and read the Declaration of Independence of the State of Israel. Outside the hall, war was already underway. Arab militias had been attacking Jewish communities for months, and five Arab armies were preparing to invade. And in this part of the speech Ben-Gurion said to the Arabs: “We appeal in the very midst of the onslaught launched against us now for months, to the Arab inhabitants of the State of Israel to preserve peace and participate in the upbuilding of the State on the basis of full and equal citizenship and due representation in all its institutions.” It was said during the war itself. What this means •Arabs living in the territory were explicitly invited to stay •They were promised full and equal citizenship •Participation in the new state was offered from day one The idea that Arabs were collectively expelled as a founding policy collapses when confronted with Israel’s founding document read aloud, on camera, at the moment of statehood. History is complex. But some claims simply don’t survive the primary source. This clip is one of them.

Tammy

93,768 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Don’t forget just days after the 1967 War, Israel offered to withdraw from territory in return for full peace treaties with Egypt, Syria and Jordan The Arab response: The Three No’s Khartoum Resolution: “No peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with it.”
1:30

Don’t forget just days after the 1967 War, Israel offered to withdraw from territory in return for full peace treaties with Egypt, Syria and Jordan The Arab response: The Three No’s Khartoum Resolution: “No peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with it.”

Captain Allen

63,665 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

In 2005, Israel gave Palestinians exactly what the world demanded: “Land for Peace.” They unilaterally withdrew from the entire Gaza Strip, but got no peace. The IDF forcibly removed every last Jew — even digging up Jewish graves. Gaza was made completely Jew-free, exactly as Palestinians demanded. Israel handed over thriving communities, farms, and hundreds of millions in infrastructure — including productive greenhouses that could have become an economic engine for a Palestinian state. What did the Palestinians do with this gift? They destroyed it. Mobs looted and burned the greenhouses. They ransacked and demolished synagogues. They celebrated with Hamas flags and gunfire. Then, in January 2006, they voted Hamas — a genocidal terrorist organization whose charter calls for the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews — into power. By 2007, Hamas completed a bloody coup, threw Fatah members off rooftops, and seized total control of Gaza. The result? - Tens of thousands of rockets fired at Israeli civilians - More than 500 miles of underground terror tunnels - Billions in international aid stolen for war, not welfare - Gaza transformed into a fortified Islamic terror enclave Land for peace was tried — and violently rejected. Everything Israel gave away in 2005 became the launchpad for the October 7 Massacre. This is the ultimate proof: the Palestinian movement has never wanted a state living next to Israel. Its goal has always been the destruction of the Jewish state — in any part of the Land. Important note: The blockade only came after Hamas seized power in 2007 and turned Gaza into a launchpad for war. And when that happened, Egypt joined it too. Disengagement didn’t bring peace. It brought the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.
1:13

In 2005, Israel gave Palestinians exactly what the world demanded: “Land for Peace.” They unilaterally withdrew from the entire Gaza Strip, but got no peace. The IDF forcibly removed every last Jew — even digging up Jewish graves. Gaza was made completely Jew-free, exactly as Palestinians demanded. Israel handed over thriving communities, farms, and hundreds of millions in infrastructure — including productive greenhouses that could have become an economic engine for a Palestinian state. What did the Palestinians do with this gift? They destroyed it. Mobs looted and burned the greenhouses. They ransacked and demolished synagogues. They celebrated with Hamas flags and gunfire. Then, in January 2006, they voted Hamas — a genocidal terrorist organization whose charter calls for the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews — into power. By 2007, Hamas completed a bloody coup, threw Fatah members off rooftops, and seized total control of Gaza. The result? - Tens of thousands of rockets fired at Israeli civilians - More than 500 miles of underground terror tunnels - Billions in international aid stolen for war, not welfare - Gaza transformed into a fortified Islamic terror enclave Land for peace was tried — and violently rejected. Everything Israel gave away in 2005 became the launchpad for the October 7 Massacre. This is the ultimate proof: the Palestinian movement has never wanted a state living next to Israel. Its goal has always been the destruction of the Jewish state — in any part of the Land. Important note: The blockade only came after Hamas seized power in 2007 and turned Gaza into a launchpad for war. And when that happened, Egypt joined it too. Disengagement didn’t bring peace. It brought the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.

Captain Allen

52,102 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Listen to these words from Meir Kahane. Listen to them very carefully. Because he speaks such a powerful truth that most people are simply unaware and ignorant of. “Before the war of 1967 broke out, and when the Arabs had all the land that they now claim they want given back to them or else there can be no peace… there was still no peace. When King Hussein had East Jerusalem in 1967 and went to war, the question arises… WHY?” And he’s absolutely right. He was always right. He may have been tough and cold and blunt, but as it was then it is the same now. The Arabs have made it clear that they want all of the land, all of Israel. And what October 7 and every day since has proven, is that they want us dead. And not just the Palestinians want that. All the Arabs want that. All the Muslims want that. And there will never be peace not because we don’t want it, but because THEY don’t want it. They don’t want a two state solution and to live side by side. They want it all.
3:00

Listen to these words from Meir Kahane. Listen to them very carefully. Because he speaks such a powerful truth that most people are simply unaware and ignorant of. “Before the war of 1967 broke out, and when the Arabs had all the land that they now claim they want given back to them or else there can be no peace… there was still no peace. When King Hussein had East Jerusalem in 1967 and went to war, the question arises… WHY?” And he’s absolutely right. He was always right. He may have been tough and cold and blunt, but as it was then it is the same now. The Arabs have made it clear that they want all of the land, all of Israel. And what October 7 and every day since has proven, is that they want us dead. And not just the Palestinians want that. All the Arabs want that. All the Muslims want that. And there will never be peace not because we don’t want it, but because THEY don’t want it. They don’t want a two state solution and to live side by side. They want it all.

Mor Edge Insight

53,058 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

There are a few things things that college kids—especially the ones chanting "free palestine" and "from the river to the sea"—should know about the history and founding of Israel. A Palestinian state was already created in 1921. There was a British mandate of Palestine, which was a foreign occupied colony of the British Empire, which comprised modern-day what's Israel and what's now Jordan. The Jews believed they were entitled, based on the Balfour Declaration of 1917, to the entire mandate of Palestine to be the future Jewish state. In 1921, it became clear that wasn't to be. The British understood they were gonna need oil from the Arab states in a future global conflict, and so they ceded 77% of that land to create a state for the Arab Muslim Palestinians. They weren't called Palestinians then, but they were the Arab Muslims who lived in the British colony of Palestine. That country became first known as Transjordan on the other side of the Jordan, then it became the Kingdom of Jordan, and ultimately today we know it as Jordan. So there is a Palestinian state full of Palestinian Muslim Arabs. There's a Palestinian queen in that state today. The prince and future king of that state is a Palestinian, and over 60% of the population are people who are Arab Muslims from the mandate of Palestine. So there is a Palestinian state. What they really want is a second Palestinian state, a 58th Muslim state, a 23rd Arab state in the world—but it's just too much to have one teeny-tiny Jewish state. The second and more important thing to understand is that Israel and the international community have already offered the Palestinians on six prior occasions, in 1936 in the Peel Commission, 1947 in the Partition Plan, 1967 at Khartoum after the Six-Day War in Sudan, 1993 at Oslo, 2000 at Camp David with Bill Clinton, and again 2008 with Ehud Olmert as the prime minister. On six different occasions, Israel, America, and the international community offered the Palestinians their own state, their own sovereign territory with their own government to to do as they please with, on the land that college kids now seem to believe they deserve a state on. And what college kids don't understand is the Palestinians rejected that state on six different occasions. On college campuses, when kids chant "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free," realize that is only the English jingle that was created in order to appeal to and deceive American college kids. In Arabic, the original phrase is: "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be Arabic." They want a full Palestinian Arab state from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea with no Jews on it. That's what they've done in every other Arab country in the world, where they've expelled and ethnically cleansed the 850,000 Jews who lived all over the Muslim world, starting in the middle of the 20th century. People who have lived there, by the way, for centuries, all ethnically cleansed. They want to do the same thing with the 10 million people who now live in Israel, and we're never gonna allow that to happen.
3:25

There are a few things things that college kids—especially the ones chanting "free palestine" and "from the river to the sea"—should know about the history and founding of Israel. A Palestinian state was already created in 1921. There was a British mandate of Palestine, which was a foreign occupied colony of the British Empire, which comprised modern-day what's Israel and what's now Jordan. The Jews believed they were entitled, based on the Balfour Declaration of 1917, to the entire mandate of Palestine to be the future Jewish state. In 1921, it became clear that wasn't to be. The British understood they were gonna need oil from the Arab states in a future global conflict, and so they ceded 77% of that land to create a state for the Arab Muslim Palestinians. They weren't called Palestinians then, but they were the Arab Muslims who lived in the British colony of Palestine. That country became first known as Transjordan on the other side of the Jordan, then it became the Kingdom of Jordan, and ultimately today we know it as Jordan. So there is a Palestinian state full of Palestinian Muslim Arabs. There's a Palestinian queen in that state today. The prince and future king of that state is a Palestinian, and over 60% of the population are people who are Arab Muslims from the mandate of Palestine. So there is a Palestinian state. What they really want is a second Palestinian state, a 58th Muslim state, a 23rd Arab state in the world—but it's just too much to have one teeny-tiny Jewish state. The second and more important thing to understand is that Israel and the international community have already offered the Palestinians on six prior occasions, in 1936 in the Peel Commission, 1947 in the Partition Plan, 1967 at Khartoum after the Six-Day War in Sudan, 1993 at Oslo, 2000 at Camp David with Bill Clinton, and again 2008 with Ehud Olmert as the prime minister. On six different occasions, Israel, America, and the international community offered the Palestinians their own state, their own sovereign territory with their own government to to do as they please with, on the land that college kids now seem to believe they deserve a state on. And what college kids don't understand is the Palestinians rejected that state on six different occasions. On college campuses, when kids chant "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free," realize that is only the English jingle that was created in order to appeal to and deceive American college kids. In Arabic, the original phrase is: "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be Arabic." They want a full Palestinian Arab state from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea with no Jews on it. That's what they've done in every other Arab country in the world, where they've expelled and ethnically cleansed the 850,000 Jews who lived all over the Muslim world, starting in the middle of the 20th century. People who have lived there, by the way, for centuries, all ethnically cleansed. They want to do the same thing with the 10 million people who now live in Israel, and we're never gonna allow that to happen.

Roy K. Altman

46,451 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

In 1948, the armies of 5 Arab Muslim states waged a genocidal war against the fledgling state of Israel. At the same time, the Jews were under an arms embargo by the British who were arming the Arabs and training them. Just prior to waging war against us, the Arab League leadership demanded that all Arabs on our land leave the land “temporarily” so that the Arab armies can sweep in and wipe out every last one of us. Now this isn’t conjecture. This is historical FACT. The majority of Arabs fled the land and waited for the Arab armies to wipe us out. But some Arabs chose to stay and fight alongside us against the invading armies. According to two UN reports, the total number of Arabs who fled the land was between 500,000 and 560,000. This number thrown around of 750,000 or a million is completely fictitious and was claimed once in an article in a Russian magazine. Now at the same time as the Arab armies forced the Arabs off the land, they simultaneously forced almost every single Jew out of every Arab land. The number of Jews forced to flee by force and having to leave all their livelihood and belongings totalled between 750,000 and 850,000. The vast majority fled to Israel, while a few fled to the US. Now unlike the Arabs, the Jews forced off their lands didn’t get a dedicated UN agency to protect them. They arrived in Israel and our country stood together and absorbed every last one. There are no Jewish refugees anymore because we took them all in and they became Israelis. The majority of the population of Israel are not European refugees. They’re from the Middle East and North Africa. Yet you never hear anybody talking about them. You don’t hear the UN demanding their right to return. You don’t see protests for the Jews forced out of their lands to be allowed back and reclaim what’s theirs. The world talks about ethnic cleansing and oppression and dehumanization, yet the only people ethnically cleansed and oppressed and dehumanized have been the Jews. In total, the Arab states are responsible for the displacement of over a million people… 500,000 Arabs and 800,000 Jews. But unlike Israel who absorbed the Jewish refugees, the Arab states refuse to absorb theirs. Why? Because for them these people are a weapon to use against Israel. The entire world has been lied to for 77 years. The Arabs aren’t the story. The Arabs aren’t the victims. And until the world stops denying the facts and historical records and evidence, nothing will ever change. 🎥 credit to Pierre Rehov
6:39

In 1948, the armies of 5 Arab Muslim states waged a genocidal war against the fledgling state of Israel. At the same time, the Jews were under an arms embargo by the British who were arming the Arabs and training them. Just prior to waging war against us, the Arab League leadership demanded that all Arabs on our land leave the land “temporarily” so that the Arab armies can sweep in and wipe out every last one of us. Now this isn’t conjecture. This is historical FACT. The majority of Arabs fled the land and waited for the Arab armies to wipe us out. But some Arabs chose to stay and fight alongside us against the invading armies. According to two UN reports, the total number of Arabs who fled the land was between 500,000 and 560,000. This number thrown around of 750,000 or a million is completely fictitious and was claimed once in an article in a Russian magazine. Now at the same time as the Arab armies forced the Arabs off the land, they simultaneously forced almost every single Jew out of every Arab land. The number of Jews forced to flee by force and having to leave all their livelihood and belongings totalled between 750,000 and 850,000. The vast majority fled to Israel, while a few fled to the US. Now unlike the Arabs, the Jews forced off their lands didn’t get a dedicated UN agency to protect them. They arrived in Israel and our country stood together and absorbed every last one. There are no Jewish refugees anymore because we took them all in and they became Israelis. The majority of the population of Israel are not European refugees. They’re from the Middle East and North Africa. Yet you never hear anybody talking about them. You don’t hear the UN demanding their right to return. You don’t see protests for the Jews forced out of their lands to be allowed back and reclaim what’s theirs. The world talks about ethnic cleansing and oppression and dehumanization, yet the only people ethnically cleansed and oppressed and dehumanized have been the Jews. In total, the Arab states are responsible for the displacement of over a million people… 500,000 Arabs and 800,000 Jews. But unlike Israel who absorbed the Jewish refugees, the Arab states refuse to absorb theirs. Why? Because for them these people are a weapon to use against Israel. The entire world has been lied to for 77 years. The Arabs aren’t the story. The Arabs aren’t the victims. And until the world stops denying the facts and historical records and evidence, nothing will ever change. 🎥 credit to Pierre Rehov

Mor Edge Insight

86,468 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten