Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Been working on my Minecraft rust rewrite for a while now. (Both client and server) Had Opus 5.5 do some rounds of optimisation and the gains have been insane compared to GPT 5 Astra Cancelled my OpenAI sub already...

18,851 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Silicon Rumors
Silicon Rumorsvor 11 Tagen

lmao gpt 5 astra, it mustve been so bad compared to opus 5.5 that its not even worth calling gpt 6

Profilbild von Denissboss1
Denissboss1vor 11 Tagen

Rust propaganda.

Profilbild von no sharing
no sharingvor 11 Tagen

Now try Assembly and C++

Profilbild von AtanganaGames | Deeper Still
AtanganaGames | Deeper Stillvor 11 Tagen

I'm curious to see the end result, I've also been inspired by your Skate x MW video. How much progress do you have on it and how many tokens you burned on this Minecraft recomp?

Profilbild von Cadis Protocol
Cadis Protocolvor 11 Tagen

Don't gatekeep and let us see the repo please !

Profilbild von Nekuro Sensei I
Nekuro Sensei Ivor 10 Tagen

Rust giving us good stuff recently (aeronautics and sable)

Profilbild von Argo18+
Argo18+vor 9 Tagen

so wait is this a mod people can use?

Profilbild von SoaR Necca
SoaR Neccavor 10 Tagen

Keep killing it 🫡

Profilbild von Ash
Ashvor 10 Tagen

rust dogshit

Ähnliche Videos

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten