正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Been working on my Minecraft rust rewrite for a while now. (Both client and server) Had Opus 5.5 do some rounds of optimisation and the gains have been insane compared to GPT 5 Astra Cancelled my OpenAI sub already...

chasm

5,493 subscribers

18,851 次观看 • 12 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 条评论

Silicon Rumors 的头像

Silicon Rumors11 天前

lmao gpt 5 astra, it mustve been so bad compared to opus 5.5 that its not even worth calling gpt 6

Denissboss1 的头像

Denissboss111 天前

Rust propaganda.

no sharing 的头像

no sharing11 天前

Now try Assembly and C++

AtanganaGames | Deeper Still 的头像

AtanganaGames | Deeper Still11 天前

I'm curious to see the end result, I've also been inspired by your Skate x MW video. How much progress do you have on it and how many tokens you burned on this Minecraft recomp?

Cadis Protocol 的头像

Cadis Protocol11 天前

Don't gatekeep and let us see the repo please !

Nekuro Sensei I 的头像

Nekuro Sensei I10 天前

Rust giving us good stuff recently (aeronautics and sable)

Argo18+ 的头像

Argo18+9 天前

so wait is this a mod people can use?

SoaR Necca 的头像

SoaR Necca10 天前

Keep killing it 🫡

Ash 的头像

Ash10 天前

rust dogshit

相关视频

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

Bhavy☄️

167,004 次观看 • 16 天前

GPT 5.5 just buried opus 4.7 I had it build a pokemon style battle app. 1 prompt. the opus game crashes 90% of the time and Ui is absolute garbage. GPT 5.5 one shotted a masterpiece. Time to cancel anthropic sub?

GPT 5.5 just buried opus 4.7 I had it build a pokemon style battle app. 1 prompt. the opus game crashes 90% of the time and Ui is absolute garbage. GPT 5.5 one shotted a masterpiece. Time to cancel anthropic sub?

Max Blade

460,454 次观看 • 5 个月前

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. From a single prompt: “Build the highest-quality playable PUBG you can.” I went to sleep. When I woke up, both had built a fully playable game🤯 Opus worked for 10 hours end to end, while Astra took just 3.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. From a single prompt: “Build the highest-quality playable PUBG you can.” I went to sleep. When I woke up, both had built a fully playable game🤯 Opus worked for 10 hours end to end, while Astra took just 3.

Emm | scenario.com

58,854 次观看 • 16 天前

Opus 5.5 has been looping on my open-world NYC game for almost a day now, and it's continuing to improve. Jump in and try it (it's multiplayer!):

Opus 5.5 has been looping on my open-world NYC game for almost a day now, and it's continuing to improve. Jump in and try it (it's multiplayer!):

Matt Shumer

198,008 次观看 • 16 天前

Asked opus 5.5 to make a video of openai solving Navier-Stokes. Very nice model, I still prefer Astra and 5.6 as my main drivers as I do a lot of research heavy work but 5.5 Opus is the first time since 4.7 that I want to heavily run Claude. It has great taste.

Asked opus 5.5 to make a video of openai solving Navier-Stokes. Very nice model, I still prefer Astra and 5.6 as my main drivers as I do a lot of research heavy work but 5.5 Opus is the first time since 4.7 that I want to heavily run Claude. It has great taste.

Jimmy Apples 🍎/acc

41,222 次观看 • 16 天前

Claude Fable 5 makes new things possible. I one shot a full horror game with it. One prompt. I have never seen AI output a game like this. This is the leap I've been waiting for. 80.3 on SWE-Bench Pro vs Opus 4.8 at 69.2, the biggest jump I have ever seen on that benchmark. It passed GPT 5.5 in both coding and intelligence on Artificial Analysis. I already canceled my $200 ChatGPT Pro plan. It fixed a Bridge Voice bug in one shot that GPT 5.5, Opus 4.7, and Opus 4.8 all failed to crack for 2 months. 10/10. Best model I have ever used. Full review below.

Claude Fable 5 makes new things possible. I one shot a full horror game with it. One prompt. I have never seen AI output a game like this. This is the leap I've been waiting for. 80.3 on SWE-Bench Pro vs Opus 4.8 at 69.2, the biggest jump I have ever seen on that benchmark. It passed GPT 5.5 in both coding and intelligence on Artificial Analysis. I already canceled my $200 ChatGPT Pro plan. It fixed a Bridge Voice bug in one shot that GPT 5.5, Opus 4.7, and Opus 4.8 all failed to crack for 2 months. 10/10. Best model I have ever used. Full review below.

BridgeMind

19,020 次观看 • 4 个月前

Day 3 of getting back to building my gamified workout tracker. (have some AI features) I just tested both Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 for the multilingual feature, and Opus 4.8 is still slightly better. It only needed one prompt to solve it. My apps always supports multiple languages because I target multiple markets and don’t want to depend on just one market. Powered by Opus 4.8, Rork, Cursor

Day 3 of getting back to building my gamified workout tracker. (have some AI features) I just tested both Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 for the multilingual feature, and Opus 4.8 is still slightly better. It only needed one prompt to solve it. My apps always supports multiple languages because I target multiple markets and don’t want to depend on just one market. Powered by Opus 4.8, Rork, Cursor

Alex Nguyen

14,570 次观看 • 3 个月前

Opus 5.5 built a multiplayer lawn mow simulator with beers and cigars Made it live on my server and chat joined. the future is looking insane.

Opus 5.5 built a multiplayer lawn mow simulator with beers and cigars Made it live on my server and chat joined. the future is looking insane.

Max Blade

195,755 次观看 • 17 天前

Let's keep benchmarking with the Night train this time, with GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, so here are all four! 🚀 I gave each model the exact same prompt: “Build a Night train.” •Opus 5.5 • GPT-6 Astra • GPT-6 Sol • GPT-6 Luna Something that really surprised me: GPT-6 Sol produced almost the exact same rocket launch as Opus 5.5! The colors are slightly different, but the overall result is remarkably similar. For this prompt, I’d even put Sol ahead of Astra. I’m seriously impressed by Sol, especially at half the API price of Opus 5.5! 🤯 I’m starting to use this approach in my own workflow. I kept one Codex subscription so I can run a bunch of Sol sub-agents while keeping my main agent on Astra. Sol is so cheap for what it can do! Knowing when to switch models based on the task, the quality you need, and the cost is becoming an essential skill in this new AI era.

Let's keep benchmarking with the Night train this time, with GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, so here are all four! 🚀 I gave each model the exact same prompt: “Build a Night train.” •Opus 5.5 • GPT-6 Astra • GPT-6 Sol • GPT-6 Luna Something that really surprised me: GPT-6 Sol produced almost the exact same rocket launch as Opus 5.5! The colors are slightly different, but the overall result is remarkably similar. For this prompt, I’d even put Sol ahead of Astra. I’m seriously impressed by Sol, especially at half the API price of Opus 5.5! 🤯 I’m starting to use this approach in my own workflow. I kept one Codex subscription so I can run a bunch of Sol sub-agents while keeping my main agent on Astra. Sol is so cheap for what it can do! Knowing when to switch models based on the task, the quality you need, and the cost is becoming an essential skill in this new AI era.

Tony

112,633 次观看 • 14 天前

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 次观看 • 3 个月前

Guess the cartoon this scene is from. Opus 5.5 is great, but do not write GPT-6 off. This test asked for a fully procedural build of a rather famous scene, no imports, no generators. And here, to my eye, GPT-6 did it noticeably better. Both models ran on Max effort, both took about an 1.5h. Opus 5.5: 141 objects, 51-step build timelapse. GPT-6: 616 objects, 727-step build timelapse.

Guess the cartoon this scene is from. Opus 5.5 is great, but do not write GPT-6 off. This test asked for a fully procedural build of a rather famous scene, no imports, no generators. And here, to my eye, GPT-6 did it noticeably better. Both models ran on Max effort, both took about an 1.5h. Opus 5.5: 141 objects, 51-step build timelapse. GPT-6: 616 objects, 727-step build timelapse.

Stefan 3D AI

22,643 次观看 • 16 天前

sonnet 5 is routing to sonnet 5.5 it's been a week since it started routing to newer model and team already confirmed that sonnet 5.5 is coming soon from early testing it looks like a huge upgrade from sonnet 5 like opus 5 to opus 5.5 just look at this output, it looks way better then gpt 6 sol i think it's either anthropic is training their models on voxels or sol is just bad please openai don't let sonnet mog sol

sonnet 5 is routing to sonnet 5.5 it's been a week since it started routing to newer model and team already confirmed that sonnet 5.5 is coming soon from early testing it looks like a huge upgrade from sonnet 5 like opus 5 to opus 5.5 just look at this output, it looks way better then gpt 6 sol i think it's either anthropic is training their models on voxels or sol is just bad please openai don't let sonnet mog sol

J A Z I I

21,610 次观看 • 15 天前

Astra (on medium) one-shotted this version of the OpenAI Super Bowl ad from 2025 by watching the original, using Remotion and GPT-Image-2 A couple more turns and access to the OpenAI brand kit and it would probably have been perfect. Welcome to the Intelligence Age indeed

pranav

90,895 次观看 • 1 个月前

Check out side-by-side outputs generated on Arena from Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic and GPT-6 Sol by OpenAI. Scores for Claude Opus 5.5 are coming soon. Real-world tasks from our global community of users power the Arena leaderboards. Head to Arena now to test it out, and stay tuned!

Check out side-by-side outputs generated on Arena from Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic and GPT-6 Sol by OpenAI. Scores for Claude Opus 5.5 are coming soon. Real-world tasks from our global community of users power the Arena leaderboards. Head to Arena now to test it out, and stay tuned!

Arena.ai

147,987 次观看 • 16 天前

CALL OF DUTY: THE BROWSER COLLECTION IS LIVE. I brought all my Call of Duty browser ports together. Moon, Kino, Nuketown, Hijacked and Cheese Cube, all under one link. No installs. All thanks to Opus 5.5 and GPT Astra. Have fun. Link below.

CALL OF DUTY: THE BROWSER COLLECTION IS LIVE. I brought all my Call of Duty browser ports together. Moon, Kino, Nuketown, Hijacked and Cheese Cube, all under one link. No installs. All thanks to Opus 5.5 and GPT Astra. Have fun. Link below.

Luckey Faraday

76,217 次观看 • 23 小时前

Been working on something new: Sprint It’s my take on working with image and video models on a canvas, and we already have teams using it for ~all of their imagery

Been working on something new: Sprint It’s my take on working with image and video models on a canvas, and we already have teams using it for ~all of their imagery

Ludwig Pettersson

14,608 次观看 • 1 个月前

I've had this song stuck in my head and wanted to see how easy it was to make the sorts of AI music videos i'm seeing on here. I basically used the prompt from donald with opus 5.5 and a couple rounds of iteration and ~2 hours and some fal ai credits later had this. Wild!

I've had this song stuck in my head and wanted to see how easy it was to make the sorts of AI music videos i'm seeing on here. I basically used the prompt from donald with opus 5.5 and a couple rounds of iteration and ~2 hours and some fal ai credits later had this. Wild!

Nathan Calvin

48,762 次观看 • 10 天前

This looks like a video of the Golden Gate Bridge, but it's actually entirely generated using code by Claude Opus 5.5. From my testing, I think Opus is just as good at building 3D scenes as Astra. 📌 Watch my latest video to see how Opus and Astra compare on this scene and more:

This looks like a video of the Golden Gate Bridge, but it's actually entirely generated using code by Claude Opus 5.5. From my testing, I think Opus is just as good at building 3D scenes as Astra. 📌 Watch my latest video to see how Opus and Astra compare on this scene and more:

Peter Yang

78,067 次观看 • 17 天前

SKYRIM COMBAT MAY HAVE FINALLY BEEN SAVED🚨 A user in my Discord named Funny Bones has been working on an Elden Ring combat Rust rewrite! This means we can now implement Elden Ring's combat into any game we want - this port into Skyrim took 5 minutes!

SKYRIM COMBAT MAY HAVE FINALLY BEEN SAVED🚨 A user in my Discord named Funny Bones has been working on an Elden Ring combat Rust rewrite! This means we can now implement Elden Ring's combat into any game we want - this port into Skyrim took 5 minutes!

chasm

2,111,078 次观看 • 3 天前