Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🇧🇾🇷🇺 Belarus is running joint nuclear drills with Russia right on NATO’s eastern flank, simulating tactical nuclear weapons deployments near Poland and Lithuania. Read that again: nuclear drills on NATO’s doorstep. Belarus has quietly become Russia’s forward nuclear staging ground in Europe, and the message behind these exercises is... show more

Mario Nawfal

3,722,687 subscribers

191,505 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Putin Placing Nuclear Weapons in Belarus 1. Moscow will station tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus. 2. Putin claims this will not violate nuclear nonproliferation agreements. 3. Russia has moved 10 aircraft to Belarus that are capable of carrying tactical nuclear weapons 4. He also said “we are not transferring our nuclear weapons to Belarus but will station them there, like the United States does in Europe.” Are we on the brink of WW3 and nuclear annihilation?

Putin Placing Nuclear Weapons in Belarus 1. Moscow will station tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus. 2. Putin claims this will not violate nuclear nonproliferation agreements. 3. Russia has moved 10 aircraft to Belarus that are capable of carrying tactical nuclear weapons 4. He also said “we are not transferring our nuclear weapons to Belarus but will station them there, like the United States does in Europe.” Are we on the brink of WW3 and nuclear annihilation?

Mario Nawfal

978,170 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Recently, negotiations of different countries with Belarus have intensified. What is the significance of Belarus for different countries? ◾95% of China's land transit of goods go through Belarus (the land transit comprises 3% of all China's exports). ◾️The China-Belarus "Great Stone" Industrial park is the largest overseas industrial site of China. It was created with personal support and involvement of Lukashenko and Xi Jinping. The original plan was for it to become a gateway for Chinese goods into Europe and Russia. ◾️Lukashenko can also provide information on Russia for China. Belarus has logistical and geopolitical significance for China. The situation has become even more intense with Poland closing its borders with Belarus due to Zapad-2025 military training. ◾️Russia also makes use of Belarus' location to threaten Europe and NATO, first and foremost, with nuclear weapons. A large military base is being built in Belarus, allegedly, for the Oreshnik missile and/or nuclear weapons. ◾️The United States have relaunched direct contacts with Belarus, wishing to limit China's influence, as well as limit Russia's military presence, especially in the nuclear area. 📹: Lukashenko being greeted in Beijing in June

Recently, negotiations of different countries with Belarus have intensified. What is the significance of Belarus for different countries? ◾95% of China's land transit of goods go through Belarus (the land transit comprises 3% of all China's exports). ◾️The China-Belarus "Great Stone" Industrial park is the largest overseas industrial site of China. It was created with personal support and involvement of Lukashenko and Xi Jinping. The original plan was for it to become a gateway for Chinese goods into Europe and Russia. ◾️Lukashenko can also provide information on Russia for China. Belarus has logistical and geopolitical significance for China. The situation has become even more intense with Poland closing its borders with Belarus due to Zapad-2025 military training. ◾️Russia also makes use of Belarus' location to threaten Europe and NATO, first and foremost, with nuclear weapons. A large military base is being built in Belarus, allegedly, for the Oreshnik missile and/or nuclear weapons. ◾️The United States have relaunched direct contacts with Belarus, wishing to limit China's influence, as well as limit Russia's military presence, especially in the nuclear area. 📹: Lukashenko being greeted in Beijing in June

Anton Gerashchenko

381,333 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Belarus Preparing for War with NATO? Defense Minister Signals Readiness to Fight Alongside Russia Belarusian Defense Minister Viktor Khrenin has warned of a “high probability” of a future conflict with the West. According to Khrenin, a potential confrontation between Russia and Belarus on one side and NATO on the other could quickly escalate from a regional conflict into a global one. Naturally, he places no blame on either Alexander Lukashenka or Vladimir Putin. Khrenin argues that NATO’s military buildup in Poland and the Baltic states resembles preparations for a direct military confrontation. As evidence, he points to rising NATO defense spending and the growing number of alliance troops stationed near the borders of the so-called Union State of Russia and Belarus. Against this backdrop, Belarus continues to expand its military capabilities. The country already hosts Russian tactical nuclear weapons and the Oreshnik missile system.

Belarus Preparing for War with NATO? Defense Minister Signals Readiness to Fight Alongside Russia Belarusian Defense Minister Viktor Khrenin has warned of a “high probability” of a future conflict with the West. According to Khrenin, a potential confrontation between Russia and Belarus on one side and NATO on the other could quickly escalate from a regional conflict into a global one. Naturally, he places no blame on either Alexander Lukashenka or Vladimir Putin. Khrenin argues that NATO’s military buildup in Poland and the Baltic states resembles preparations for a direct military confrontation. As evidence, he points to rising NATO defense spending and the growing number of alliance troops stationed near the borders of the so-called Union State of Russia and Belarus. Against this backdrop, Belarus continues to expand its military capabilities. The country already hosts Russian tactical nuclear weapons and the Oreshnik missile system.

NEXTA

92,276 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇷🇺🇧🇾 Putin on nuclear deployments: “Tactical nuclear weapons are many times more powerful than what the Americans dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We don’t deploy them anywhere, well, in Belarus, yes. But aside from Belarus, no. The Americans have them all over the world: across Europe, in Turkey — everywhere. But we have more. That is true.”

🇷🇺🇧🇾 Putin on nuclear deployments: “Tactical nuclear weapons are many times more powerful than what the Americans dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We don’t deploy them anywhere, well, in Belarus, yes. But aside from Belarus, no. The Americans have them all over the world: across Europe, in Turkey — everywhere. But we have more. That is true.”

DD Geopolitics

418,387 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Russia demonstrates its nuclear weapons in Belarus The Russian Ministry of Defense has released video footage showing the delivery of nuclear warheads to field sites of a missile brigade in Belarus during ongoing nuclear drills. Moscow states that Russian nuclear weapons have now been deployed on Belarusian territory. The exercises involve over 64,000 troops and more than 7,800 pieces of military equipment, including around 200 missile launchers. Russia currently has 320 launchers in total.

Russia demonstrates its nuclear weapons in Belarus The Russian Ministry of Defense has released video footage showing the delivery of nuclear warheads to field sites of a missile brigade in Belarus during ongoing nuclear drills. Moscow states that Russian nuclear weapons have now been deployed on Belarusian territory. The exercises involve over 64,000 troops and more than 7,800 pieces of military equipment, including around 200 missile launchers. Russia currently has 320 launchers in total.

Visegrád 24

38,632 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN: Russia has successfully launched a Yars intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching virtually any point in Europe Its range exceeds 10,000 kilometers. Russia is holding joint nuclear drills with Belarus and, for the first time during such exercises, has transferred nuclear munitions to military units in both countries. Normally, such procedures are rehearsed using mock warheads rather than actual nuclear weapons.

🚨 JUST IN: Russia has successfully launched a Yars intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching virtually any point in Europe Its range exceeds 10,000 kilometers. Russia is holding joint nuclear drills with Belarus and, for the first time during such exercises, has transferred nuclear munitions to military units in both countries. Normally, such procedures are rehearsed using mock warheads rather than actual nuclear weapons.

NEXTA

100,463 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Russia and Belarus have started joint military exercises on the combat use of nuclear weapons on May 19 through May 21. 64,000 troops will participate in the exercises. Russia's Strategic Missile Forces, the Northern and Pacific Fleets, long-range aviation, and some forces from the Leningrad and Central Military Districts are involved. According to Russia, the exercises involve more than 200 missile launchers, over 140 aircraft, 73 surface ships, and 13 submarines. Video attached: footage from the Zapad-2025 joint Russia-Belarus military exercises (September 2025), which included training with nuclear-capable systems and hypersonic missiles near NATO borders. Source: BBC

Russia and Belarus have started joint military exercises on the combat use of nuclear weapons on May 19 through May 21. 64,000 troops will participate in the exercises. Russia's Strategic Missile Forces, the Northern and Pacific Fleets, long-range aviation, and some forces from the Leningrad and Central Military Districts are involved. According to Russia, the exercises involve more than 200 missile launchers, over 140 aircraft, 73 surface ships, and 13 submarines. Video attached: footage from the Zapad-2025 joint Russia-Belarus military exercises (September 2025), which included training with nuclear-capable systems and hypersonic missiles near NATO borders. Source: BBC

Anton Gerashchenko

151,564 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

“Belarus has tactical nuclear weapons for defense” and “Russia will use its full arsenal to defend Belarus” — President Lukashenko’s words. The US and Europe know this. Zelensky, the puppet, has been warned — yet the aggression keeps moving closer to borders it should never approach. A possible clash with Belarus doesn’t stay with Belarus — it means Russia gets involved. That tells us the West is consciously broadening the conflict in the region. Watch LIVE on BitChute at 5:30 PM Moscow time (2:30 PM GMT):

“Belarus has tactical nuclear weapons for defense” and “Russia will use its full arsenal to defend Belarus” — President Lukashenko’s words. The US and Europe know this. Zelensky, the puppet, has been warned — yet the aggression keeps moving closer to borders it should never approach. A possible clash with Belarus doesn’t stay with Belarus — it means Russia gets involved. That tells us the West is consciously broadening the conflict in the region. Watch LIVE on BitChute at 5:30 PM Moscow time (2:30 PM GMT):

Rick Sanchez

30,479 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Belarus has become Russia’s nuclear staging ground. Belarus has not been annexed. But functionally, it has already become part of Russia. Lukashenko has long existed only with the Kremlin’s permission. When Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, Lukashenko officially appeared to be a bystander - yet missiles and columns of tanks moved through Belarusian territory. Russia used it as its own operational zone. In March 2023, Putin announced the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons. In December 2024, Russia and Belarus signed the Treaty on Security Guarantees that legalized permanent Russian bases and legally included Belarus in Russia’s nuclear strategy. Since mid-2025, around 2,000 Russian troops have been permanently stationed in Belarus, including air defense and aerospace units. In December 2025, the Oreshnik ballistic missile entered combat duty near Krychaw. In May 2026, large-scale joint nuclear exercises were held: 64,000 troops, 200 missile launchers, 73 surface ships, and 13 submarines. The nuclear sharing agreement marks a departure from Russia’s long-standing position, as Moscow spent decades criticizing NATO’s nuclear-sharing arrangements. Now it is reproducing the same model it once condemned. The 2024 nuclear doctrine explicitly equated a conventional attack on Belarus with an attack on Russia - automatically creating conditions for a nuclear response. Control over the warheads officially remains with Moscow. But Putin stated that Lukashenko himself would select targets for Oreshnik deployed in Belarus. In other words, the Belarusian president would bear public responsibility for missiles launched by Putin. Now to the arsenal and the numbers. As of March 2026, Russia possesses around 4,400 nuclear warheads in total, of which up to 2,000 are assigned to non-strategic tactical forces. Belarus hosts Iskander-M - the 465th missile brigade in Asipovichy. Range: up to 500 km. Accuracy: 5-7 meters. Nuclear warhead: 10-50 kilotons. Vilnius is just 340 km away. Flight time: 3-4 minutes. NATO would have virtually no warning time. Oreshnik belongs to another category. Speed exceeds 14,000 km/h. Up to six independent MIRV blocks, each capable of deploying up to six sub-warheads. Range exceeds 5,500 km. Interception by modern air defense systems is almost impossible. From Belarusian positions, Oreshnik can reach an airbase in Poland in 11 minutes and NATO headquarters in Brussels in 17 minutes. Berlin, Ramstein, and Warsaw all fall within range. According to Ukraine’s Defense Intelligence, only three missiles had been produced at the time of deployment. One was used against Dnipro in November 2024. One was destroyed in Kapustin Yar during a joint operation involving Ukraine’s Security Service, Defense Intelligence, and Foreign Intelligence Service. The Kremlin plans to produce up to six missiles per year. There is also Lida airbase - just 40 km from the Lithuanian border. Modified Su-25 aircraft are capable of carrying nuclear bombs. The most dangerous problem is neither range nor speed. It is the impossibility of identification. Until the moment of impact, it is impossible to determine whether Oreshnik carries a nuclear or conventional warhead. Every launch is an automatic nuclear alarm regardless of the actual payload. This ambiguity is a strategic weapon no less important than the warhead itself. Now to the likely scenarios. ◾️ The most likely scenario is not total nuclear war. It is a "demonstration strike": a single low-yield tactical strike against a peripheral military base - for example, an airfield in Poland or the Baltics. The goal is not destruction but testing Article 5. The Kremlin’s logic: "You will not launch a nuclear response over a single tactical strike." ◾️ The second scenario is an Oreshnik strike against a NATO logistics hub: Rzeszów, Ramstein, Warsaw. Most likely with conventional warheads. But this cannot be confirmed before impact. Even a conventional strike under the carrier’s nuclear ambiguity could freeze weapons transit to Ukraine. Shock and fear of escalation alone would be a sufficient outcome for the Kremlin. ◾️ The third scenario is a strike on a nuclear power plant with a conventional warhead. A radiological effect without the formal use of weapons of mass destruction. Maximum psychological pressure on Europe. ◾️ The fourth: a new ground offensive against Ukraine launched from Belarusian territory under nuclear blackmail. NATO freezes, Ukraine becomes isolated, and the frontline shrinks by 400 kilometers. Finally, let’s turn to the West’s response - or the absence of one. No symmetrical nuclear response followed. NATO did not deploy nuclear weapons in the Baltics or Poland. The response remained conventional: additional brigades and expanded air defense. New START expired in February 2026. No new treaty exists. Verification of nuclear arsenals is effectively absent. The United States abandoned the "voluntary compliance with limits" proposed by Russia. Patriot and THAAD were not designed to intercept targets at Mach 10 with maneuvering flight trajectories. Kyiv directly called Belarus’s transformation into a "nuclear outpost" near NATO borders an unprecedented challenge to the global security architecture and a dangerous precedent that de facto legitimizes nuclear proliferation among authoritarian regimes.

Belarus has become Russia’s nuclear staging ground. Belarus has not been annexed. But functionally, it has already become part of Russia. Lukashenko has long existed only with the Kremlin’s permission. When Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, Lukashenko officially appeared to be a bystander - yet missiles and columns of tanks moved through Belarusian territory. Russia used it as its own operational zone. In March 2023, Putin announced the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons. In December 2024, Russia and Belarus signed the Treaty on Security Guarantees that legalized permanent Russian bases and legally included Belarus in Russia’s nuclear strategy. Since mid-2025, around 2,000 Russian troops have been permanently stationed in Belarus, including air defense and aerospace units. In December 2025, the Oreshnik ballistic missile entered combat duty near Krychaw. In May 2026, large-scale joint nuclear exercises were held: 64,000 troops, 200 missile launchers, 73 surface ships, and 13 submarines. The nuclear sharing agreement marks a departure from Russia’s long-standing position, as Moscow spent decades criticizing NATO’s nuclear-sharing arrangements. Now it is reproducing the same model it once condemned. The 2024 nuclear doctrine explicitly equated a conventional attack on Belarus with an attack on Russia - automatically creating conditions for a nuclear response. Control over the warheads officially remains with Moscow. But Putin stated that Lukashenko himself would select targets for Oreshnik deployed in Belarus. In other words, the Belarusian president would bear public responsibility for missiles launched by Putin. Now to the arsenal and the numbers. As of March 2026, Russia possesses around 4,400 nuclear warheads in total, of which up to 2,000 are assigned to non-strategic tactical forces. Belarus hosts Iskander-M - the 465th missile brigade in Asipovichy. Range: up to 500 km. Accuracy: 5-7 meters. Nuclear warhead: 10-50 kilotons. Vilnius is just 340 km away. Flight time: 3-4 minutes. NATO would have virtually no warning time. Oreshnik belongs to another category. Speed exceeds 14,000 km/h. Up to six independent MIRV blocks, each capable of deploying up to six sub-warheads. Range exceeds 5,500 km. Interception by modern air defense systems is almost impossible. From Belarusian positions, Oreshnik can reach an airbase in Poland in 11 minutes and NATO headquarters in Brussels in 17 minutes. Berlin, Ramstein, and Warsaw all fall within range. According to Ukraine’s Defense Intelligence, only three missiles had been produced at the time of deployment. One was used against Dnipro in November 2024. One was destroyed in Kapustin Yar during a joint operation involving Ukraine’s Security Service, Defense Intelligence, and Foreign Intelligence Service. The Kremlin plans to produce up to six missiles per year. There is also Lida airbase - just 40 km from the Lithuanian border. Modified Su-25 aircraft are capable of carrying nuclear bombs. The most dangerous problem is neither range nor speed. It is the impossibility of identification. Until the moment of impact, it is impossible to determine whether Oreshnik carries a nuclear or conventional warhead. Every launch is an automatic nuclear alarm regardless of the actual payload. This ambiguity is a strategic weapon no less important than the warhead itself. Now to the likely scenarios. ◾️ The most likely scenario is not total nuclear war. It is a "demonstration strike": a single low-yield tactical strike against a peripheral military base - for example, an airfield in Poland or the Baltics. The goal is not destruction but testing Article 5. The Kremlin’s logic: "You will not launch a nuclear response over a single tactical strike." ◾️ The second scenario is an Oreshnik strike against a NATO logistics hub: Rzeszów, Ramstein, Warsaw. Most likely with conventional warheads. But this cannot be confirmed before impact. Even a conventional strike under the carrier’s nuclear ambiguity could freeze weapons transit to Ukraine. Shock and fear of escalation alone would be a sufficient outcome for the Kremlin. ◾️ The third scenario is a strike on a nuclear power plant with a conventional warhead. A radiological effect without the formal use of weapons of mass destruction. Maximum psychological pressure on Europe. ◾️ The fourth: a new ground offensive against Ukraine launched from Belarusian territory under nuclear blackmail. NATO freezes, Ukraine becomes isolated, and the frontline shrinks by 400 kilometers. Finally, let’s turn to the West’s response - or the absence of one. No symmetrical nuclear response followed. NATO did not deploy nuclear weapons in the Baltics or Poland. The response remained conventional: additional brigades and expanded air defense. New START expired in February 2026. No new treaty exists. Verification of nuclear arsenals is effectively absent. The United States abandoned the "voluntary compliance with limits" proposed by Russia. Patriot and THAAD were not designed to intercept targets at Mach 10 with maneuvering flight trajectories. Kyiv directly called Belarus’s transformation into a "nuclear outpost" near NATO borders an unprecedented challenge to the global security architecture and a dangerous precedent that de facto legitimizes nuclear proliferation among authoritarian regimes.

Anton Gerashchenko

59,276 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

JUST IN: 🇵🇱🇳🇴🇷🇺 Poland & Norway Draw A Red Line For Russia Poland and Norway are sending Russia a powerful warning: Attack NATO territory, and NATO will respond. Polish troops are conducting rapid response exercises near Russia’s Kaliningrad, while Norway is strengthening its military presence along its Russian border. The message from NATO’s frontline states is unmistakable: “Every inch of NATO territory will be defended.” With Poland facing Russia’s western military pressure and Norway guarding NATO’s Arctic frontier, Europe’s eastern and northern flanks are moving to maximum readiness. 🇵🇱🇳🇴🇷🇺 Moscow is being warned: any attack could trigger a direct NATO response.

JUST IN: 🇵🇱🇳🇴🇷🇺 Poland & Norway Draw A Red Line For Russia Poland and Norway are sending Russia a powerful warning: Attack NATO territory, and NATO will respond. Polish troops are conducting rapid response exercises near Russia’s Kaliningrad, while Norway is strengthening its military presence along its Russian border. The message from NATO’s frontline states is unmistakable: “Every inch of NATO territory will be defended.” With Poland facing Russia’s western military pressure and Norway guarding NATO’s Arctic frontier, Europe’s eastern and northern flanks are moving to maximum readiness. 🇵🇱🇳🇴🇷🇺 Moscow is being warned: any attack could trigger a direct NATO response.

War Radar

23,630 просмотров • 7 дней назад

🇺🇦🇷🇺🇧🇾🇪🇺 Zelensky is warning that Russia could use Belarus as the launchpad for its next major escalation. The geography is what makes it dangerous. From Belarus, Russian forces could threaten Kyiv from the north, pressure Poland, and put the Suwalki Gap, NATO's narrow land link to the Baltics, under pressure. The concern is that troops, missiles, and drones could be moved into Belarus under the cover of military exercises before any attack begins. The goal may not be a full-scale invasion. It may be forcing NATO to defend multiple fronts at once. One border crossing in the wrong direction could change the entire conflict. Source: wallstreetresearchcenter (Youtube)

🇺🇦🇷🇺🇧🇾🇪🇺 Zelensky is warning that Russia could use Belarus as the launchpad for its next major escalation. The geography is what makes it dangerous. From Belarus, Russian forces could threaten Kyiv from the north, pressure Poland, and put the Suwalki Gap, NATO's narrow land link to the Baltics, under pressure. The concern is that troops, missiles, and drones could be moved into Belarus under the cover of military exercises before any attack begins. The goal may not be a full-scale invasion. It may be forcing NATO to defend multiple fronts at once. One border crossing in the wrong direction could change the entire conflict. Source: wallstreetresearchcenter (Youtube)

Mario Nawfal

157,005 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

BREAKING; EUROPE on high Alert: BELARUS and RUSSIA are Working on a Nuclear Warhead for the Polonez MRL Russia and Belarus have on going developments to allow nuclear weapon use from systems including the Polonez. Russian specialists are involved in creating compatible warheads, potentially compact tactical ones with yields similar to those for Iskander missiles (up to 50 kilotons). .The Polonez is a Belarusian 300mm MLRS (range up to 300 km, originally based on Chinese technology but later shifted toward Russian components), distinct from the nuclear-capable Iskander-M systems Russia has already deployed in Belarus with tactical nuclear warheads under Russian control. Making Polonez nuclear-capable would give Belarus a more independent delivery option, though warheads would likely remain Russian-controlled.

BREAKING; EUROPE on high Alert: BELARUS and RUSSIA are Working on a Nuclear Warhead for the Polonez MRL Russia and Belarus have on going developments to allow nuclear weapon use from systems including the Polonez. Russian specialists are involved in creating compatible warheads, potentially compact tactical ones with yields similar to those for Iskander missiles (up to 50 kilotons). .The Polonez is a Belarusian 300mm MLRS (range up to 300 km, originally based on Chinese technology but later shifted toward Russian components), distinct from the nuclear-capable Iskander-M systems Russia has already deployed in Belarus with tactical nuclear warheads under Russian control. Making Polonez nuclear-capable would give Belarus a more independent delivery option, though warheads would likely remain Russian-controlled.

Global Surveillance

34,430 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🇪🇺🇧🇾🇷🇺 Europe is watching Belarus. For months, Ukraine's intelligence has issued warnings that have often proven significant. Now, fresh concerns are growing that Belarus could become the next front in the war. If Belarus were to enter the conflict directly, Ukraine would suddenly face pressure from another direction, forcing it to defend multiple fronts at once. Military analysts warn that any major escalation could ripple across Eastern Europe, raising tensions throughout the region and increasing concerns about NATO's eastern flank. Nothing has been confirmed. But if Belarus enters the war, it would mark one of the biggest turning points since Russia's full scale invasion. The next move could reshape the battlefield and the security of Europe.

🇪🇺🇧🇾🇷🇺 Europe is watching Belarus. For months, Ukraine's intelligence has issued warnings that have often proven significant. Now, fresh concerns are growing that Belarus could become the next front in the war. If Belarus were to enter the conflict directly, Ukraine would suddenly face pressure from another direction, forcing it to defend multiple fronts at once. Military analysts warn that any major escalation could ripple across Eastern Europe, raising tensions throughout the region and increasing concerns about NATO's eastern flank. Nothing has been confirmed. But if Belarus enters the war, it would mark one of the biggest turning points since Russia's full scale invasion. The next move could reshape the battlefield and the security of Europe.

War Radar

306,758 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

We need to stop this utter nonsense about fighting Russia. First, Russia is not an enemy and won't be attacking Europe, and second, Russia is a nuclear power. Who in their right mind thinks that if Russia was at risk of losing a conventional war that it wouldn't use its nuclear arsenal? It's only Putins' cool head that's stopping Russia from retaliating against NATO aggression and lobbing a couple of low-grade nuclear weapons at Europe right now. NATO assisting Ukraine to violate Russian territory would have been unthinkable during the Cold War. Wise up, people...

We need to stop this utter nonsense about fighting Russia. First, Russia is not an enemy and won't be attacking Europe, and second, Russia is a nuclear power. Who in their right mind thinks that if Russia was at risk of losing a conventional war that it wouldn't use its nuclear arsenal? It's only Putins' cool head that's stopping Russia from retaliating against NATO aggression and lobbing a couple of low-grade nuclear weapons at Europe right now. NATO assisting Ukraine to violate Russian territory would have been unthinkable during the Cold War. Wise up, people...

Kerry Burgess

32,806 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🇷🇺🇱🇹 Put a nuke in Lithuania and Russia takes the whole country. That's the warning. Fmr. CIA analyst Larry Johnson responded to the reports rattling Eastern Europe, US warnings that Russia may be preparing a limited provocation on Polish soil within months, and Poland's PM Tusk saying the coming months may be "truly critical." Johnson's focus went straight to the Baltics, and to one red line in particular: "If Lithuania is going to offer to put nuclear weapons in their country, Russia is not going to stand for that for one minute. They'll take over Lithuania." His reasoning is cold and simple. Nuclear weapons on Lithuanian soil register as an existential threat to Moscow. Russia has ignored Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia so far, he says, but cross that line and "Russia is going to take it out." SonofNewAmericanRevolution

🇷🇺🇱🇹 Put a nuke in Lithuania and Russia takes the whole country. That's the warning. Fmr. CIA analyst Larry Johnson responded to the reports rattling Eastern Europe, US warnings that Russia may be preparing a limited provocation on Polish soil within months, and Poland's PM Tusk saying the coming months may be "truly critical." Johnson's focus went straight to the Baltics, and to one red line in particular: "If Lithuania is going to offer to put nuclear weapons in their country, Russia is not going to stand for that for one minute. They'll take over Lithuania." His reasoning is cold and simple. Nuclear weapons on Lithuanian soil register as an existential threat to Moscow. Russia has ignored Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia so far, he says, but cross that line and "Russia is going to take it out." SonofNewAmericanRevolution

Mario Nawfal

107,422 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Russian President Vladimir Putin has ordered Russia’s powerful Satan II nuclear missiles to be battle-ready immediately, signaling a sign of escalation. This move comes amid warnings from Russia that its patience with Ukraine and NATO is running out. Capable of striking targets across the U.S. and Europe, the Satan II missiles are a key component of Russia's nuclear arsenal.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has ordered Russia’s powerful Satan II nuclear missiles to be battle-ready immediately, signaling a sign of escalation. This move comes amid warnings from Russia that its patience with Ukraine and NATO is running out. Capable of striking targets across the U.S. and Europe, the Satan II missiles are a key component of Russia's nuclear arsenal.

Shadow of Ezra

350,032 просмотров • 1 год назад

"TRUMP WARNS RUSSIA" Russia has repeatedly warned Europe and NATO with nuclear weapons. Trump has apparently grown tired of the threats and is sending a clear message to Russia. 📌Trump: “We were a little bit threatened by Russia recently, and I sent a submarine, nuclear submarine, the most lethal weapon ever made" "Just to be careful because we can't let people throw around that word"

"TRUMP WARNS RUSSIA" Russia has repeatedly warned Europe and NATO with nuclear weapons. Trump has apparently grown tired of the threats and is sending a clear message to Russia. 📌Trump: “We were a little bit threatened by Russia recently, and I sent a submarine, nuclear submarine, the most lethal weapon ever made" "Just to be careful because we can't let people throw around that word"

WORLD AT WAR

108,638 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🇵🇱”POLAND SENDS A MESSAGE TO RUSSIA” Poland is deploying around 40,000 soldiers to the country’s borders with Belarus and Russia amid heightened tensions. A boost in troop presence was expected, given that Russian and Belarusian forces are set to kick off a series of military drills close to the Polish frontier. Poland sends a message to Russia. Stay away or else…… Video for illustration.

🇵🇱”POLAND SENDS A MESSAGE TO RUSSIA” Poland is deploying around 40,000 soldiers to the country’s borders with Belarus and Russia amid heightened tensions. A boost in troop presence was expected, given that Russian and Belarusian forces are set to kick off a series of military drills close to the Polish frontier. Poland sends a message to Russia. Stay away or else…… Video for illustration.

Global Strategy

1,188,722 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Putin claims “the West is openly preparing for war with Russia.” This from the man who launched the largest war in Europe since 1945, invaded a neighbouring country, illegally annexed territory, threatened nuclear escalation, and spends every day accusing others of what he is doing himself. There is only one country routinely firing nuclear-capable missiles in Europe and warning of nuclear Armageddon whenever events do not go its way. That country is Russia.

Putin claims “the West is openly preparing for war with Russia.” This from the man who launched the largest war in Europe since 1945, invaded a neighbouring country, illegally annexed territory, threatened nuclear escalation, and spends every day accusing others of what he is doing himself. There is only one country routinely firing nuclear-capable missiles in Europe and warning of nuclear Armageddon whenever events do not go its way. That country is Russia.

Shaun Pinner

57,318 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад