Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

"Belonging & fitting in are different concepts. Fitting in = conforming, belonging = true acceptance. Immigrants & minorities face unique challenges, but embracing our identity leads to belonging 🌍🌟 When we're comfortable in our own skin, we create inclusive spaces where everyone feels valued 💪🤝 #BelongingMatters #EmbraceYourIdentity"

19,230 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

8 Comments

Katayoun S Madani MD MS FICS(Jr)'s profile picture
Katayoun S Madani MD MS FICS(Jr)2 years ago

@PipeCabreraV As an immigrant I’m very thankful for inspiring voices and presence of leaders like you.

Sofia Wagemaker FICS (Jr)'s profile picture
Sofia Wagemaker FICS (Jr)2 years ago

Thank you for being an inspiration!!!💕

Dr. Alejandro Quiroga's profile picture
Dr. Alejandro Quiroga2 years ago

Animo! Puedes con eso y mas! I liked your video, thank you!

jorge's profile picture
jorge2 years ago

Felicidades, eres una mujer fuerte, una guerrera. Te admiro!!!

ELENA RUIZ ÚCAR's profile picture
ELENA RUIZ ÚCAR2 years ago

I love all your inspirational speeches @pferrada1. You're a terrific mentor, mainly for women surgeons. Thank you 💖

Rajat M's profile picture
Rajat M2 years ago

Adaptability is what makes things comfortable

Jeison Peñuela A.'s profile picture
Jeison Peñuela A.2 years ago

Gracias por tus mensajes Paula!!! Eres un orgullo de Colombia 🇨🇴 para el mundo!

Paula Ferrada MD FACS FCCM MAMSE's profile picture
Paula Ferrada MD FACS FCCM MAMSE2 years ago

💪🏻🇨🇴💗

Related Videos

⭕️ We are Banyamulenge. We are Tutsi. We are of Banyarwanda ancestry, and we are Congolese. None of these identities contradicts the others. The name Banyamulenge was never intended to erase or deny our origins. Before the name became widely used, our community was commonly identified as Banyarwanda, Tutsi, or Tutsi-Banyarwanda of South Kivu. Becoming known as Banyamulenge did not create a new ethnicity, nor did it erase the history and ancestry that existed before the name. ⭕️The name Banyamulenge acquired an important territorial and political meaning because it helped distinguish Congolese Tutsi-Banyarwanda families who had lived in Congo for generations from Tutsi refugees who arrived from Rwanda, particularly following the upheavals beginning in 1959. Identifying ourselves as Banyamulenge was a way of saying: we are from here; we have deep roots and a distinct history in South Kivu; we are not newly arrived refugees. It was an affirmation of our Congolese belonging, not a rejection of our ancestry or our Tutsi identity. ⭕️That is why saying, “I am Banyamulenge, therefore I am not Tutsi and have no historical connection to Banyarwanda,” amounts to denying part of our own history. We do not need to deny our ancestry to prove our Congolese nationality. Colonial borders did not erase the peoples, languages, cultures, and histories that existed before those borders were drawn. Being Tutsi, speaking Kinyarwanda, and having historical roots connected to Rwanda does not make us citizens of Rwanda today. Ancestry and nationality are not the same thing. ⭕️ In that sense, the Banyamulenge identity itself represented an ideology of self-preservation—Twirwaneho—long before Twirwaneho became an organization. It asserted our existence, our history, and our right to belong in Congo without requiring us to deny who we are. We are Banyamulenge because of the distinct community and history we built in South Kivu; we are Tutsi by ethnicity and heritage; we are of Banyarwanda ancestry; and we are Congolese by nationality and generations of belonging. The name Banyamulenge was never meant to erase where we came from—it affirmed where we belong. Both of these elders are stating historical facts, and correct. Tito Rutaremara Cc: Monsieur Gapangwa!

Adele Kibasumba

39,828 views • 13 days ago

Blonde-haired, blue-eyed white people from Ukraine were celebrated for making home-made Molotov cocktails to defend their land, but the brown Arab Muslim, the Iranian, the Afghan, is far too “uncivilised” to have the right to resist. Their resistance is “barbaric” because it comes from an inherently “violent” culture. The selective application of international law and one’s right to defend themselves from illegal occupation and colonial violence has been revealed to be a complete contradiction in the west, and is no doubt infuriating. But we need to also understand how these “resistance” narratives are processed in communities. These narratives do not stay on our screens. They shape how entire communities see themselves. When Indigenous, Black, and other racialised peoples repeatedly see their histories, struggles, cultures, and resistance framed as dangerous, irrational, or inherently violent, many begin to internalise those messages. Some distance themselves from their own identities in search of safety, acceptance, or legitimacy. Others carry a deep, unspoken rage born from exclusion, dispossession, and the constant demand to prove their humanity. When people are disconnected from their roots, denied dignity, and taught to be ashamed of where they come from, they will still search for belonging. It’s a basic human need to feel a sense of community. The question is whether we create spaces that nurture healing, identity, and justice, or leave them vulnerable to finding belonging in places that exploit their pain.

Dr. Sabreena Ghaffar-Siddiqui

151,653 views • 2 months ago