Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

BEN AFFLECK BREAKS DOWN EXACTLY WHY HOLLYWOOD IS DYING — AND THE MATH IS BRUTAL. IT COSTS A MINIMUM OF $25 MILLION JUST TO SHOOT A MOVIE TODAY WITH A-LIST STARS. ANOTHER $25 MILLION TO MARKET IT. THAT’S $50 MILLION BEFORE A SINGLE TICKET IS SOLD. THEATERS TAKE 50%...

Vivek4real_'s profile picture

Vivek Sen

277,379 subscribers

132,248 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

KunstNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Ben Affleck breaks down why a $25M movie has to make $100M just to break even Affleck: "It's very, very difficult to make a movie for less than $25 million" "You spend about the same amount to advertise the movie as you spend to make it. So you spent $25 million to make it, $25 million to advertise it now you've got $50 million into the movie" "From the theaters you get back roughly 50%. So if a movie makes $100 million, you get back $50 million. You've got to gross a hundred million just in simple math" "People now go, 'this movie looks good, but I'll see it when it comes on streaming'"
1:28

Ben Affleck breaks down why a $25M movie has to make $100M just to break even Affleck: "It's very, very difficult to make a movie for less than $25 million" "You spend about the same amount to advertise the movie as you spend to make it. So you spent $25 million to make it, $25 million to advertise it now you've got $50 million into the movie" "From the theaters you get back roughly 50%. So if a movie makes $100 million, you get back $50 million. You've got to gross a hundred million just in simple math" "People now go, 'this movie looks good, but I'll see it when it comes on streaming'"

Arslan

3,573,145 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Ben Affleck says making a theatrical movie is far more expensive than most people realize. “Even without paying a huge movie star, it’s very difficult to make a film for less than $25 million today.” “And that number can climb fast once you add action scenes, stunts, or visual effects.” “What most people don’t realize is that you often spend about as much marketing the movie as you do making it.” “If the movie costs $25 million to make, you might spend another $25 million promoting it.” “Now you’re $50 million into the project.” “And theaters only send back about 50% of the box office.” “So if your movie grosses $100 million, you’re basically breaking even.”
1:25

Ben Affleck says making a theatrical movie is far more expensive than most people realize. “Even without paying a huge movie star, it’s very difficult to make a film for less than $25 million today.” “And that number can climb fast once you add action scenes, stunts, or visual effects.” “What most people don’t realize is that you often spend about as much marketing the movie as you do making it.” “If the movie costs $25 million to make, you might spend another $25 million promoting it.” “Now you’re $50 million into the project.” “And theaters only send back about 50% of the box office.” “So if your movie grosses $100 million, you’re basically breaking even.”

KΞRL_✂️

145,487 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Matt Damon explains why a $25,000,000 movie must make $100,000,000 to break even after DVDs became obsolete “The economics of trying to make a kind of mid range drama now are just so terrible. If you have a $25 million movie, you have to put that much into print and advertising, so that’s $50 million. You split your money between the distributor and the exhibitor, so the people who own the movie theaters get half of the money. That means if your cost is now at $50 million, you need to make $100 million just to break even” “That’s why Behind the Candelabra, we did it at HBO because we couldn’t get funding from any studio. They said, ‘We love you guys. We believe in you. We think the movie is going to be great, but would I bet that this is going to make $100 million. Would I gamble $50 million on that assumption. It’s just too much’” “That’s because the DVD market is gone, and technology just erased the DVD. That was a huge revenue stream for all of us because you could afford for your movie to come out in a theater and not make everything back. It could make it partially back, and you’d know the DVD was coming to help fill the gap”
1:06

Matt Damon explains why a $25,000,000 movie must make $100,000,000 to break even after DVDs became obsolete “The economics of trying to make a kind of mid range drama now are just so terrible. If you have a $25 million movie, you have to put that much into print and advertising, so that’s $50 million. You split your money between the distributor and the exhibitor, so the people who own the movie theaters get half of the money. That means if your cost is now at $50 million, you need to make $100 million just to break even” “That’s why Behind the Candelabra, we did it at HBO because we couldn’t get funding from any studio. They said, ‘We love you guys. We believe in you. We think the movie is going to be great, but would I bet that this is going to make $100 million. Would I gamble $50 million on that assumption. It’s just too much’” “That’s because the DVD market is gone, and technology just erased the DVD. That was a huge revenue stream for all of us because you could afford for your movie to come out in a theater and not make everything back. It could make it partially back, and you’d know the DVD was coming to help fill the gap”

dank

80,740 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

Seth Rogen reveals Hollywood studios will no longer approve movies based on script and director alone. ​"When we made Superbad, they bought our script, hired a director, said it would have a $20 million budget, and it would start shooting in April. That would never happen today in 100 million years." ​"No studio would just buy a script, give it a release date, cast it, and then make it." ​"Now, everything has to be in place before they will decide whether or not they're making it. Who's the director? Who are the actors? Are they famous enough? Do they have big enough names? If not, we gotta get different ones, or else we won't make it." ​"Amy Pascal was willing to just say, 'Make this movie. You'll put the funniest people in it, that will make the best version of the movie, and the best version of this movie is what will make us the most money.' That is not said anymore, really, in Hollywood."
1:56

Seth Rogen reveals Hollywood studios will no longer approve movies based on script and director alone. ​"When we made Superbad, they bought our script, hired a director, said it would have a $20 million budget, and it would start shooting in April. That would never happen today in 100 million years." ​"No studio would just buy a script, give it a release date, cast it, and then make it." ​"Now, everything has to be in place before they will decide whether or not they're making it. Who's the director? Who are the actors? Are they famous enough? Do they have big enough names? If not, we gotta get different ones, or else we won't make it." ​"Amy Pascal was willing to just say, 'Make this movie. You'll put the funniest people in it, that will make the best version of the movie, and the best version of this movie is what will make us the most money.' That is not said anymore, really, in Hollywood."

Chuks

1,820,046 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

One of the fastest ways to end the war in Sudan – where 25 million people need aid, 10 million have been displaced, and 5 million are near famine – is for the UAE to stop arming the RSF. That’s why I introduced a bill to cut off U.S. arms sales to the UAE until they do so.
4:35

One of the fastest ways to end the war in Sudan – where 25 million people need aid, 10 million have been displaced, and 5 million are near famine – is for the UAE to stop arming the RSF. That’s why I introduced a bill to cut off U.S. arms sales to the UAE until they do so.

Congresswoman Sara Jacobs

287,732 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

traditional marketing is dying and Obsession (the 2026 movie) is one of the biggest examples of it the movie has made $225 million in 2 weeks of launching and it only costed $750,000 to make thats a 300x return on production budget while a Star Wars movie came out a week after and it costed $166,000,000, more than 220x than obsession and it's struggling to make a 1x return on production budget the difference between these 2 movies is that obsession was incredibly clippable the clips of that movie are literally trending TikTok audios people clipped obsession and made it go viral all over social media they didn't need a $50 million marketing budget or interviews, or a press release just teenagers on their phone with capcut and tiktok made this movie $225 million in 2 weeks that's what happens when you're culturally relevant people's social media feeds are the culture when you run an ad or pay for a partnership it's not a part of the culture, it's an interruption and people despise that when you do clipping for your brand, product, or movie, it blends into the feed it's one with the culture people move with the culture, they share it, they react to it, and they build trends around it the reason people are rushing to go and watch Obsession is because they keep seeing it on their fyp 20 times a day it naturally builds curiosity and fomo and they don't want to miss out clipping blends you into the culture and when you become one with the trends that's when your costs will literally go down 300x and your ROI will go up 1000x this is what we see on Content Rewards every single day with our campaigns where our CPMs get as low as $0.30 to even $0.09 and we see numbers like 400 million views w/ only $100,000 in spend if you also want to see results like that, DM me and I'll help you
0:45

traditional marketing is dying and Obsession (the 2026 movie) is one of the biggest examples of it the movie has made $225 million in 2 weeks of launching and it only costed $750,000 to make thats a 300x return on production budget while a Star Wars movie came out a week after and it costed $166,000,000, more than 220x than obsession and it's struggling to make a 1x return on production budget the difference between these 2 movies is that obsession was incredibly clippable the clips of that movie are literally trending TikTok audios people clipped obsession and made it go viral all over social media they didn't need a $50 million marketing budget or interviews, or a press release just teenagers on their phone with capcut and tiktok made this movie $225 million in 2 weeks that's what happens when you're culturally relevant people's social media feeds are the culture when you run an ad or pay for a partnership it's not a part of the culture, it's an interruption and people despise that when you do clipping for your brand, product, or movie, it blends into the feed it's one with the culture people move with the culture, they share it, they react to it, and they build trends around it the reason people are rushing to go and watch Obsession is because they keep seeing it on their fyp 20 times a day it naturally builds curiosity and fomo and they don't want to miss out clipping blends you into the culture and when you become one with the trends that's when your costs will literally go down 300x and your ROI will go up 1000x this is what we see on Content Rewards every single day with our campaigns where our CPMs get as low as $0.30 to even $0.09 and we see numbers like 400 million views w/ only $100,000 in spend if you also want to see results like that, DM me and I'll help you

Alex

11,671 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

ELON: "GROK WILL READ 100 MILLION POSTS A DAY AND CURATE YOUR FEED ACCORDINGLY" "The really big change is that Grok will literally read everything that’s posted to the platform. That’s 100 million pieces of content every single day. That’s just in English, too. It probably goes even higher when you include other languages. Grok is going to start by reading what it thinks are the top 10 million of those 100 million posts. It will actually read, understand, categorize, and match them to users. This is not a job humans could ever do. Once that’s scaling, we’ll include the entire 100 million per day. Grok will literally read through 100 million posts and show you what it thinks are the most interesting ones for you." Source: The All-In Podcast, Elon Musk
1:37

ELON: "GROK WILL READ 100 MILLION POSTS A DAY AND CURATE YOUR FEED ACCORDINGLY" "The really big change is that Grok will literally read everything that’s posted to the platform. That’s 100 million pieces of content every single day. That’s just in English, too. It probably goes even higher when you include other languages. Grok is going to start by reading what it thinks are the top 10 million of those 100 million posts. It will actually read, understand, categorize, and match them to users. This is not a job humans could ever do. Once that’s scaling, we’ll include the entire 100 million per day. Grok will literally read through 100 million posts and show you what it thinks are the most interesting ones for you." Source: The All-In Podcast, Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

1,961,894 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

It takes courage to reform welfare. When 4 million people are on sickness benefits and nearly half a million are under 25, it's clear the system isn't working. I'm prepared to rip up the current system and build something better – one that supports disabled people and is fair to taxpayers.
0:50

It takes courage to reform welfare. When 4 million people are on sickness benefits and nearly half a million are under 25, it's clear the system isn't working. I'm prepared to rip up the current system and build something better – one that supports disabled people and is fair to taxpayers.

Helen Whately MP

72,326 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Here it is: Wisconsin’s WisVote voter database for the 2020 election: It listed a staggering 7.1 million registrants, even though the state had only about 4 million eligible adults. And it gets worse: of those 4 million adults in Wisconsin, not all are registered, and not all vote. The actual number is closer to 3.6–3.7 million. Meaning: It’s easy in the Dominion rigging system to assign a person to a mail-in ballot.
1:01

Here it is: Wisconsin’s WisVote voter database for the 2020 election: It listed a staggering 7.1 million registrants, even though the state had only about 4 million eligible adults. And it gets worse: of those 4 million adults in Wisconsin, not all are registered, and not all vote. The actual number is closer to 3.6–3.7 million. Meaning: It’s easy in the Dominion rigging system to assign a person to a mail-in ballot.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

283,358 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

BRIAN KENNEDY: It's not just Antifa. It's communists and Muslims as well. This is a war. They see it as a war. They're all criminal illegals. And the fact is we blinked in the beginning. We thought it was the right policy to deport them, originally just the most violent criminals, when in fact we should have been deporting all of them. And it may not be 20 million, it may be 25 million, or if we go with Bovino, 100 million. --- We have to have an industrial scale plan for deporting them.
1:37

BRIAN KENNEDY: It's not just Antifa. It's communists and Muslims as well. This is a war. They see it as a war. They're all criminal illegals. And the fact is we blinked in the beginning. We thought it was the right policy to deport them, originally just the most violent criminals, when in fact we should have been deporting all of them. And it may not be 20 million, it may be 25 million, or if we go with Bovino, 100 million. --- We have to have an industrial scale plan for deporting them.

Bannon’s WarRoom

19,851 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Warren Buffett: "Finance departments teach that volatility equals risk. They want to measure risk and they don't know how to do it, so they say that volatility measures risk." "I've often used the example of The Washington Post stock, when we first bought it in 1973, had gone down almost 50% from a valuation of the whole company of ~$175 million down to maybe $80-90 million. Because it happened very fast, the beta of the stock had actually increased — and a professor would have told you that the company was more risky if you bought it for $80 million than if you bought it for $170 million. Which is something that I've thought about ever since they told me that 25 years ago — and I still haven't figured it out." (Berkshire Hathaway AGM || 1997)
0:52

Warren Buffett: "Finance departments teach that volatility equals risk. They want to measure risk and they don't know how to do it, so they say that volatility measures risk." "I've often used the example of The Washington Post stock, when we first bought it in 1973, had gone down almost 50% from a valuation of the whole company of ~$175 million down to maybe $80-90 million. Because it happened very fast, the beta of the stock had actually increased — and a professor would have told you that the company was more risky if you bought it for $80 million than if you bought it for $170 million. Which is something that I've thought about ever since they told me that 25 years ago — and I still haven't figured it out." (Berkshire Hathaway AGM || 1997)

Kevin Carpenter

37,341 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Nick Fuentes enemies and detractors claim they can’t understand why so many people resonate with his message. The answer is obvious. “That’s a load of shit. Nobody wants to live in a country and share it with 200 million Indians…if we have to share it with millions upon millions of people from third world shit holes. They don’t even share our alphabet, they don’t come from a Christian country, we have nothing in common with them.” “Nobody wants that. Black people don’t want it. White people don’t want it. Even many of the assimilated immigrants…they don’t want it.”
5:23

Nick Fuentes enemies and detractors claim they can’t understand why so many people resonate with his message. The answer is obvious. “That’s a load of shit. Nobody wants to live in a country and share it with 200 million Indians…if we have to share it with millions upon millions of people from third world shit holes. They don’t even share our alphabet, they don’t come from a Christian country, we have nothing in common with them.” “Nobody wants that. Black people don’t want it. White people don’t want it. Even many of the assimilated immigrants…they don’t want it.”

Fractured Light

126,714 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Kevin O'Leary says $5 million liquid in t-bills is when you know you've actually made it. "the hardest thing is to make the first million, when you make it put it in t-bills, two to three million is actually quite easy once you figure it out, but where people get undisciplined is buying shit they don't need, your mandate is $5 million liquid in t-bills, liquidity with wealth is actually a superpower, most people who think they're wealthy couldn't raise a million dollars by 2pm if they tried"
1:26

Kevin O'Leary says $5 million liquid in t-bills is when you know you've actually made it. "the hardest thing is to make the first million, when you make it put it in t-bills, two to three million is actually quite easy once you figure it out, but where people get undisciplined is buying shit they don't need, your mandate is $5 million liquid in t-bills, liquidity with wealth is actually a superpower, most people who think they're wealthy couldn't raise a million dollars by 2pm if they tried"

Yonan

1,068,988 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Odell Beckham Jr gets emotional as he says it is hard to live on $100 Million and it doesn’t last forever. “You always hear the people who ain’t us and has never been in the position say things like ‘oh that will last a lifetime’” “I always explain this to people like you give someone a 5year $100 Million contract. What is it really? It’s 5 years for $60 Million. We’re getting tax” “If we do the math, that’s $12 Million a year that you have to spend, use, save, invest, flaunt, buy a car, get my mum a house. Everything costs money” “So if you’re spending $8 Million a year, that’s really $40 Million over 5 years” “So if you start doing the maths it’s like, that’s a 5 year span of where you’re getting $8 Million” “Can you make that last a lifetime?”
1:00

Odell Beckham Jr gets emotional as he says it is hard to live on $100 Million and it doesn’t last forever. “You always hear the people who ain’t us and has never been in the position say things like ‘oh that will last a lifetime’” “I always explain this to people like you give someone a 5year $100 Million contract. What is it really? It’s 5 years for $60 Million. We’re getting tax” “If we do the math, that’s $12 Million a year that you have to spend, use, save, invest, flaunt, buy a car, get my mum a house. Everything costs money” “So if you’re spending $8 Million a year, that’s really $40 Million over 5 years” “So if you start doing the maths it’s like, that’s a 5 year span of where you’re getting $8 Million” “Can you make that last a lifetime?”

Percy

71,239 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

.Naval: “I’m always struck by the Elon Musk story where he did PayPal… And he said something along the lines of: ‘I made $200 million from the sale of PayPal. I put $100 million into SpaceX, $80 million into Tesla, $20 million into Solar City, and I had to borrow money for rent.’ This guy is a perennial risk taker. He’s always willing to start over. He doesn’t have any pride about being seen as successful or being seen as a failure. He’s willing to put it all on the line. Even now, his new startup is the USA. He’s basically trying to fix it like he would fix one of his startups. It’s a willingness to look like a fool and a willingness to start over. A lot of people just don’t have that. They become successful or rich or famous, and that’s it, they’re stuck. They don’t want to go back to zero. And creating anything great requires zero to one. And that means you go back to zero. And that’s really painful and hard to do.”
1:04

.Naval: “I’m always struck by the Elon Musk story where he did PayPal… And he said something along the lines of: ‘I made $200 million from the sale of PayPal. I put $100 million into SpaceX, $80 million into Tesla, $20 million into Solar City, and I had to borrow money for rent.’ This guy is a perennial risk taker. He’s always willing to start over. He doesn’t have any pride about being seen as successful or being seen as a failure. He’s willing to put it all on the line. Even now, his new startup is the USA. He’s basically trying to fix it like he would fix one of his startups. It’s a willingness to look like a fool and a willingness to start over. A lot of people just don’t have that. They become successful or rich or famous, and that’s it, they’re stuck. They don’t want to go back to zero. And creating anything great requires zero to one. And that means you go back to zero. And that’s really painful and hard to do.”

Arjun Khemani

1,152,126 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Australia has up to 3.7 million noncitizens—in a population of just 27.4 million. Hospitals are stretched, housing is unaffordable, and life is more expensive. Why won’t the government reveal the real number?
1:59

Australia has up to 3.7 million noncitizens—in a population of just 27.4 million. Hospitals are stretched, housing is unaffordable, and life is more expensive. Why won’t the government reveal the real number?

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

47,294 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Matt Damon says “The Town” made a fortune and was later relicensed for $35 million, but Ben Affleck still didn’t make $1 million despite writing, directing and starring in the film because he was on a flat salary Q: “Do you know what Good Will Hunting has grossed in its time?” Matt Damon: “When it came out, I think it was like 220-something in the theater.” “Actually, with our studio, that’s one of the things we really fight for… reversion rights.” “Ben called me a couple years ago and he goes, ‘You know, The Town just got relicensed for 35 million bucks.’” “Which just means that he made a great movie and people are still watching it.” “At the time, that movie made a fortune. It did all this stuff.” “But he was on a flat salary.” “I don’t even think he made a million bucks for that movie.” “And he wrote it, directed it, starred in it.” “It was one of those things.” “Our view was, look, if you do something like that as one of the real contributors to it, then if there’s money kind of in perpetuity, then you should be a part of that.”
1:04

Matt Damon says “The Town” made a fortune and was later relicensed for $35 million, but Ben Affleck still didn’t make $1 million despite writing, directing and starring in the film because he was on a flat salary Q: “Do you know what Good Will Hunting has grossed in its time?” Matt Damon: “When it came out, I think it was like 220-something in the theater.” “Actually, with our studio, that’s one of the things we really fight for… reversion rights.” “Ben called me a couple years ago and he goes, ‘You know, The Town just got relicensed for 35 million bucks.’” “Which just means that he made a great movie and people are still watching it.” “At the time, that movie made a fortune. It did all this stuff.” “But he was on a flat salary.” “I don’t even think he made a million bucks for that movie.” “And he wrote it, directed it, starred in it.” “It was one of those things.” “Our view was, look, if you do something like that as one of the real contributors to it, then if there’s money kind of in perpetuity, then you should be a part of that.”

agim𓍯

549,436 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

Marvel finally dropped the trailer for Doomsday. The estimated budget for is roughly $400 million for production… alongside an additional $300 million for marketing. $700 million, costs.. so it needs $1.4 billion globally just to break even. Is this likely? Or is this not even the point for Disney.. they just need a hit for the franchise.. to keep the merch/theme park rides etc popular?
2:18

Marvel finally dropped the trailer for Doomsday. The estimated budget for is roughly $400 million for production… alongside an additional $300 million for marketing. $700 million, costs.. so it needs $1.4 billion globally just to break even. Is this likely? Or is this not even the point for Disney.. they just need a hit for the franchise.. to keep the merch/theme park rides etc popular?

TheMekon_Venus

10,392 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Richard Compton's "Macon County Line" (1974) was made for a budget of $225,000 but it became the single most profitable film of 1974 (in cost-to-gross ratio), earning $18.8 million in North America and over $30 million worldwide. The movie is docudrama in tone but it was presented as "a true story" to attract a wider audience but the plot and characters are entirely fictional.
2:08

Richard Compton's "Macon County Line" (1974) was made for a budget of $225,000 but it became the single most profitable film of 1974 (in cost-to-gross ratio), earning $18.8 million in North America and over $30 million worldwide. The movie is docudrama in tone but it was presented as "a true story" to attract a wider audience but the plot and characters are entirely fictional.

DepressedBergman

16,626 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten