Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Ben Affleck understands Al more than most people realize
861,301 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)
34 Kommentare

He’s wrong. Boomer tier thinking. AI is just getting started. Soon “actors” will be replaced by “agents” who have just as much charisma, just as much emotion, and even more creative improv skills. He’s coping.

Not really. He’s wrong. Claude can code pretty damn well.

He’s been playing chess while the rest of Hollywood plays checkers

Ben’s making a solid point here. A lot of what AI generates right now really does come out feeling pretty average and flat for actual storytelling — it’s clean but missing that real human spark and risk. I get where he’s coming from. Still, I’m not all the way there either. When people treat it as a collaborator instead of the whole creator, it can actually help push ideas and cut the grind. Somewhere in the middle feels more honest.

Yup

Ben Affleck just sold his own AI studio, InterPositive, to Netflix for efficiency gains using filmmaker-trained models, yet he’s out on Rogan dismissing generative AI as “shitty” average output that can’t produce meaningful creative work and only serves as a basic tool. This is textbook Hollywood hypocrisy from an insider who cashes in privately while publicly gatekeeping the technology that threatens the old guard’s control. The facts as of March 2026 prove him wrong on the trajectory and the impact. Agentic and multi-agent AI systems are already delivering documented 171% average ROI and cutting complex workloads by up to 33% in enterprise settings. Creator workflows show 91.9% adoption rates, with AI handling ideation, scripting, and editing at scale, exactly the “drudgery” Affleck admits VFX tools already automate. Fine-tuned models with retrieval-augmented generation and human oversight don’t regress to some meaningless mean; they accelerate iteration and open high-quality production to independents who were previously locked out by studio budgets and unions. This isn’t sci-fi replacement. It’s the same evidence-based productivity shift I’ve tracked across sectors: the kind that exposes stalled projects, regulatory capture, and elite self-interest. Just like the $219 billion Bovaer methane grift that delivers at best 4.5% global reduction after manufacturer-funded trials, or the $120 billion COVID mRNA contracts sold on original-strain hype while variants like B.1.351 rendered efficacy near-zero before rollout. Affleck knows the tool works, he monetized it, yet peddles the “can’t stand it” narrative to protect an industry that’s churned out formulaic content for decades. Real creative risk and vision have always come from people, not machines. AI simply removes the gatekeepers who decide whose story gets told. The data on adoption, ROI, and output quality are unambiguous. Hollywood elites can keep clinging to 20th-century scarcity models and subjective complaints, or they can adapt the way every other productive sector already has. Precision over propaganda. Evidence over excuses. Citizens first. Canada First. Barry Sharp @BarryESharp Fighting policy storms for real freedom & evidence-based reform.

Fun fact: Ben Affleck founded an AI-powered filmmaking tools startup called InterPositive in 2022, and Netflix just acquired it!

Sounds like Ben needs a lesson in “prompting,” don’t you think, @grok? How long before AI replaces traditional actors?

He’s got some good points, but once AI becomes truly recursive it’s game over.

AI. Always thinking about AI. Can't stop thinking about AI.

Ben Affleck also founded an AI-powered filmmaking tools startup called InterPositive in 2022, and Netflix just acquired it By the way he’s looking healthier in this clip. Hope he’s avoiding toxic relationships. It helps

Do you know why Netflix and Paramount were fighting over Warner bros catalog? Because they know old classic movies will be in demand when AI generated garbage will flop universally, people will want to watch older movies with real actors.

If he knew half of what you’re implying, he’d have said Metadata. The word Watermark never would’ve left his mouth. 🥱

He is 100 wrong! Let’s see what he says five years from now.

I could listen to what he’s saying if it wasn’t for the bizarre delivery, over the top body language, etc.

HE IS DRAMATICALLY UNDERESTIMATING THE POWER AND INTELLIGENCE OF AI. IN (20) YEARS OR LESS, I SEE AI BEING VIRTUAL LAWYERS IN COURT REPRESENTING PEOPLE AND PERFORMING MAJOR MEDICAL SURGERIES UNLESS MED-BEDS ARE RELEASED

The irony is Hollywood's fear of AI might be exactly what's holding them back from using it effectively. The ones embracing it quietly are already ahead.

sorry Ben, its evolving. so sorry we have agentic AIs too;"they dont write, they execute". sorry Ben.

$600Mill and Sold

@jm_arina He thinks he does. But he doesn’t.

Who’s gonna tell him?

He has no idea

Movies already are dumbed down averaged out stuff, so AI fits perfectly

Ben Affleck gets it

So this was just marketing to get Netflix to buy his AI company absolutely brilliant 👏

Tell me you don’t know how to prompt, without telling me you don’t know how to prompt.

It's more like being afraid of what's unstoppable. Shitty talk . It's average if you don't know how to use it

I dont think AI can make star trek any worse than it is now, klingon in dresses? holograms swallowing their com badges? turning starfleet academy into the military rejects? Yeah, hollyweird is so done.

Every AI will always go to the average because it's programmed to recognize patterns, and every output will be aligned with that pattern. That's why every movie, song, or whatever it spills out will be very much the same. It will never create something new.

AI understands Ben Affleck more than most people realize

he speaks facts, to be great, you have to use AI to leverage yourself. but the thing is, AI agents are part of the game now. you can give junior-level skills (soon senior-level) to robots that run 24/7. this will replace most people, unless those people can orchestrate those AI agents. companies will have fewer employees, or they will create far more value by leveraging their talent. i bet on this, so outwork anyone. worst-case scenario: you learn too much.

Been saying this forever its clear to anyone with minimal understanding of what LLMs are what how they work

It's going to take over everything we've ever known

He used a lot of words to say nothing that’s not obvious
Ähnliche Videos
Most conditioning is more subtle than people realize.
Princess Isabella
19,561 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten
