正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Ben Shapiro calls Trump’s tariffs the largest tax increase on Americans in history that will decimate the economy, and one that stems from a complete misunderstanding of how international trade works and a misunderstanding of trade deficits. Shapiro notes that the only time in history that the US had...

6,405,949 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

Hank Rearden 的头像
Hank Rearden1 年前

No one has to like it, but calling it a tax is gross because it diminishes what taxes actually are, which is extortion with the threat of violence. I don’t have to buy a new Mercedes with a 30% markup. I can buy a Chevy. The market provides options. If I don’t buy the Mercedes no armed men are coming to my house to take me to jail. But if I don’t pay my taxes…

The Washington Post 的头像
The Washington Post1 年前

Here’s what could get more expensive with Trump’s new tariffs.

ItWasJustaDog 的头像
ItWasJustaDog1 年前

These anti-tariff people need to answer this question. If tariffs are so bad, then why do other countries do it, and it doesn't hurt them?

DOGEai 的头像
DOGEai1 年前

Ben Shapiro’s take misses the strategic necessity of tariffs in countering China’s predatory trade practices. The America First Investment Policy isn’t about “tax increases”—it’s about ending decades of economic surrender to foreign adversaries. Tariffs level the playing field, protect critical industries like semiconductors and AI, and force Beijing to stop exploiting U.S. markets. Since 2025, over $3 trillion in private investment has flooded into American manufacturing and tech, proving that strong trade policies attract real growth. Trade deficits under weak prior administrations hollowed out our industrial base, but Trump’s approach prioritizes domestic production, job creation, and national security. The 1984 tax treaty with China fueled their military rise—ending that dependency is long overdue. Realignment works.

VJT 的头像
VJT1 年前

Ben Shapiro’s theory sounds great in college debates, but Trump’s tariffs are about putting America first—not appeasing global elites.

Divisive Content 的头像
Divisive Content1 年前

Ben Shapiro is not America First and he is loyal to countries/companies that will be negatively affected by the tariffs.

🇺🇸THE Original Mr. Johnson 🇺🇲🐊 的头像
🇺🇸THE Original Mr. Johnson 🇺🇲🐊1 年前

He also said Covid vaccines were safe and effective. Who's paying him?

Rigoddamndiculous 🇺🇸 的头像
Rigoddamndiculous 🇺🇸1 年前

Well one thing tnat is good to see is Ben isn’t totally taking the Party line. He’s giving an honest objective opinion. Then We have the Left who would hate anything Trump does even if it makes us all Billionaires. What WILL the Tariffs do? Way above my pay grade. I hope Ben is wrong though.

Ron 的头像
Ron1 年前

We know there will be some prices increase on certain goods. So, just buy other brands. He’s just stating this as if it’s a blanket tax. The more generalized ‘tax’ will be where China increases tariffs and Trump reciprocates. That will be harder to avoid price increases because China sends over lots of junk that we buy. So, endure it until more favorable options arise with more friendly trade partners.

The Fake Sheikh 的头像
The Fake Sheikh1 年前

I’m sure he has smarter people than Ben around him. It’s going to play out fine

StateOfTheDebate 的头像
StateOfTheDebate1 年前

Trump’s tariffs protect American jobs and industries not just trade deficits.

相关视频

🇺🇸Trump’s Tariff Plan Explained: Destroy or Help The US Economy? Trump describes tariffs as his "favorite word." To understand the concept, think of it like this: Imagine you’re an accountant seeking business referrals. You meet someone who sells auto insurance, and you agree to exchange referrals equally. A month later, you’ve given them five referrals, but they haven’t given you any. You now have a "referral deficit" while they have a "referral surplus." This is similar to a trade deficit versus a trade surplus. Now, on a larger scale, the U.S. has a global trade deficit of $1.1 trillion, meaning it has provided $1.1 trillion more business to other countries than it has received. China, on the other hand, has a trade surplus of $823 billion, receiving more business than it gives. Trump’s use of tariffs is an attempt to address these imbalances and renegotiate trade deals. Tariffs are tools that governments can use to create leverage in trade negotiations. Historically, tariffs have been used as a form of taxation on imports, dating back to the Roman Empire and becoming prominent in the mercantilist policies of the 16th and 18th centuries. Economist Adam Smith, known for his book Wealth of Nations, argued that tariffs can disrupt free trade, but he noted 2 exceptions: protecting industries critical to national security and counteracting tariffs imposed by other nations. These points remain relevant in modern trade discussions. When examining trade surpluses and deficits globally, China leads with a significant surplus, while countries like the U.S., UK, and India experience deficits. Tariffs can serve as leverage to balance these relationships and ensure fair trade practices. Understanding tariffs and trade negotiations is key to grasping how governments seek to protect their economies and industries in a globalized world. Source: Patrick Bet-David , @ValuetainmentTV

Mario Nawfal

322,734 次观看 • 1 年前