Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Ben Shapiro: “I have offered Tucker Carlson, multiple times, both privately and publicly, to have a discussion about our differences.”

EYakoby's profile picture

Eyal Yakoby

236,286 subscribers

24,781 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

BREAKING: Tucker Carlson has a psychotic meltdown and calls Ben Shapiro one of the “dumbest people.” Is that why Tucker Carlson refuses to debate Ben?
0:10

BREAKING: Tucker Carlson has a psychotic meltdown and calls Ben Shapiro one of the “dumbest people.” Is that why Tucker Carlson refuses to debate Ben?

Eyal Yakoby

49,328 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Ben Shapiro tried to drop a video looking tough... Turned out about as cringe as you'd have imagined
0:10

Ben Shapiro tried to drop a video looking tough... Turned out about as cringe as you'd have imagined

HatsOff

1,022,111 просмотров • 10 дней назад

BREAKING: Tucker Carlson and Fox News have agreed to part ways just days after the Dominion settlement
0:16

BREAKING: Tucker Carlson and Fox News have agreed to part ways just days after the Dominion settlement

MS NOW

1,276,609 просмотров • 3 лет назад

HOLY SH*T: President Trump just said he didn't mind that Tucker Carlson interviewed Nick Fuentes. "You can't tell him who to interview." President Trump didn't even condemn Nick Fuentes or Tucker Carlson. Zionists are about to have a meltdown. America First is inevitable.
0:18

HOLY SH*T: President Trump just said he didn't mind that Tucker Carlson interviewed Nick Fuentes. "You can't tell him who to interview." President Trump didn't even condemn Nick Fuentes or Tucker Carlson. Zionists are about to have a meltdown. America First is inevitable.

Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸

230,191 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

We need to have a serious discussion about Chelsea…
0:10

We need to have a serious discussion about Chelsea…

Leah Ray

76,110 просмотров • 1 год назад

Just today people have compared me to Mamdani 3 times We are both in our 30s, but I’m better looking… I also use a fork and knife to eat.
0:12

Just today people have compared me to Mamdani 3 times We are both in our 30s, but I’m better looking… I also use a fork and knife to eat.

James Fishback

49,713 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

we need to have a serious discussion about them
0:11

we need to have a serious discussion about them

α∂єℓιηα⁷🪭

57,847 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

I hope one day we will have a discussion about this card
0:14

I hope one day we will have a discussion about this card

LucasXGamer CR

57,595 просмотров • 18 дней назад

BREAKING: When asked about Tucker Carlson's fake January 6 narrative, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre had the perfect answer. She said, "We agree with Fox Nation’s own attorneys and executives who have repeatedly stressed in multiple courts of law that Tucker Carlson is not credible, when it comes to this issue." I couldn't say it better myself!
0:13

BREAKING: When asked about Tucker Carlson's fake January 6 narrative, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre had the perfect answer. She said, "We agree with Fox Nation’s own attorneys and executives who have repeatedly stressed in multiple courts of law that Tucker Carlson is not credible, when it comes to this issue." I couldn't say it better myself!

Ed Krassenstein

4,337,276 просмотров • 3 лет назад

When I am a about to cure cancer but someone dares blame SEGA for using AI (they have only used it multiple times in the past month)
0:14

When I am a about to cure cancer but someone dares blame SEGA for using AI (they have only used it multiple times in the past month)

sonic forces fan

38,203 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

hudson kissing him on the cheek 😭 i fear we have to put aside our differences
0:11

hudson kissing him on the cheek 😭 i fear we have to put aside our differences

adiba

743,347 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Tucker Carlson blasted Ted Cruz over his lack of knowledge on Iranian fun facts. Did Tucker own Ted, or does Ted have a point? We get into that and a whole lot more on today's show. Plus... you have to know the Muffin Man!
0:15

Tucker Carlson blasted Ted Cruz over his lack of knowledge on Iranian fun facts. Did Tucker own Ted, or does Ted have a point? We get into that and a whole lot more on today's show. Plus... you have to know the Muffin Man!

Steven Crowder

89,408 просмотров • 1 год назад

Willson Contreras after a convincing Red Sox win at Fenway: “I see a lot of people talking shit about us, you have to take that personally, and we have to have some pride about our career and our game.” (🎥NESN)
0:19

Willson Contreras after a convincing Red Sox win at Fenway: “I see a lot of people talking shit about us, you have to take that personally, and we have to have some pride about our career and our game.” (🎥NESN)

Gordo

29,982 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

"I just have one thing to say. Let's have less Homer Simpsons... and more money for public schools." "Ben, I have a question." "No, Ben, no!"
0:19

"I just have one thing to say. Let's have less Homer Simpsons... and more money for public schools." "Ben, I have a question." "No, Ben, no!"

ShinyMcShine: Simpsons Quotes

81,082 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Tucker: "Neocons" like Ben Shapiro only care about money for Israel. Fuentes: Jews like Shapiro are only "here" to... get money for Israel. Tucker didn't just interview Fuentes; he has adopted his language and framing, but with "neocons" instead of Jews. In the clips below, both use ad hominem attacks to escape engaging any actual argument over the efficacy of U.S. support for Israel. Of course, Fuentes and Tucker utilize the oldest of anti-Semitic tropes, the notion of Jews (or "neocons") having dual loyalties, which has been weaponized for thousands of years to sow distrust and eventually hatred for thousands of years. Opposing financial support of Israel is an entirely legitimate position that can easily be justified using conservative principles. Plenty of conservatives have been opposed to the U.S. annual military aid to Israel, including figures as diverse as Rand Paul and, yes, Ben Shapiro. Maybe that's why the primary defense of Tucker by Megyn Kelly and others has been that he's somehow just "criticizing Israel." But when Fuentes said in 2023 that Shapiro, Dennis Prager, Mark Levin, and Joel Pollak "are running American media" and are "here (apparently living in the U.S.) to make sure Americans support the country they really care about," what possible argument is he making about policy? The same holds true when Tucker Carlson just this month said that "Shapiro and all of these guys" don't "care" about their own audiences "at all" (or, by implication, America at large) because their supposed tactic is "give us money for our preferred little country, or we're going to denounce you!" Put another way, what could Fuentes or Tucker possibly be trying to advance besides the notion that the views of Shapiro/Jews/"neocons" should not be trusted on any issue, even those having nothing to do with Israel?
0:15

Tucker: "Neocons" like Ben Shapiro only care about money for Israel. Fuentes: Jews like Shapiro are only "here" to... get money for Israel. Tucker didn't just interview Fuentes; he has adopted his language and framing, but with "neocons" instead of Jews. In the clips below, both use ad hominem attacks to escape engaging any actual argument over the efficacy of U.S. support for Israel. Of course, Fuentes and Tucker utilize the oldest of anti-Semitic tropes, the notion of Jews (or "neocons") having dual loyalties, which has been weaponized for thousands of years to sow distrust and eventually hatred for thousands of years. Opposing financial support of Israel is an entirely legitimate position that can easily be justified using conservative principles. Plenty of conservatives have been opposed to the U.S. annual military aid to Israel, including figures as diverse as Rand Paul and, yes, Ben Shapiro. Maybe that's why the primary defense of Tucker by Megyn Kelly and others has been that he's somehow just "criticizing Israel." But when Fuentes said in 2023 that Shapiro, Dennis Prager, Mark Levin, and Joel Pollak "are running American media" and are "here (apparently living in the U.S.) to make sure Americans support the country they really care about," what possible argument is he making about policy? The same holds true when Tucker Carlson just this month said that "Shapiro and all of these guys" don't "care" about their own audiences "at all" (or, by implication, America at large) because their supposed tactic is "give us money for our preferred little country, or we're going to denounce you!" Put another way, what could Fuentes or Tucker possibly be trying to advance besides the notion that the views of Shapiro/Jews/"neocons" should not be trusted on any issue, even those having nothing to do with Israel?

Joel Mowbray

165,513 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад