Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🇮🇱🇸🇾🇹🇷🇺🇸⚡️ Benjamin Netanyahu’s decision to publicly claim responsibility for Israel’s strike on Syria’s Abu al-Duhur airbase has reportedly triggered frustration inside Israel’s own security establishment, where officials wanted the sensitive operation to remain deliberately low-profile. According to i24NEWS, criticism within Israel’s security services concerns both Netanyahu’s public acknowledgment of...

visionergeo's profile picture

Visioner

223,511 subscribers

25,854 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

EğitimHaberler & PolitikaSpor
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

TURKEY VS ISRAEL? A NEW REGIONAL FLASHPOINT 🇹🇷🇮🇱 A direct conflict between Turkey and Israel is becoming a possibility. Turkey is reportedly moving weapons, military equipment and logistical support into Syria following Israeli airstrikes on the Abu al Duhur military airbase. One major factor to watch is Israel’s weapons stockpiles. After years of sustained military operations across the Middle East, concerns over ammunition and interceptor supplies are growing, with Israeli journalist Yossi Yehoshua also warning about the strain. Turkey also has the second largest standing military in NATO and a significantly larger conventional force than Iran. If tensions escalate while Israel faces stockpile pressure and the United States is already dealing with multiple strategic challenges, the consequences could be severe. The biggest question: Would NATO stay out of a direct Turkey Israel confrontation?
0:20

TURKEY VS ISRAEL? A NEW REGIONAL FLASHPOINT 🇹🇷🇮🇱 A direct conflict between Turkey and Israel is becoming a possibility. Turkey is reportedly moving weapons, military equipment and logistical support into Syria following Israeli airstrikes on the Abu al Duhur military airbase. One major factor to watch is Israel’s weapons stockpiles. After years of sustained military operations across the Middle East, concerns over ammunition and interceptor supplies are growing, with Israeli journalist Yossi Yehoshua also warning about the strain. Turkey also has the second largest standing military in NATO and a significantly larger conventional force than Iran. If tensions escalate while Israel faces stockpile pressure and the United States is already dealing with multiple strategic challenges, the consequences could be severe. The biggest question: Would NATO stay out of a direct Turkey Israel confrontation?

Defense Intelligence

97,525 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

JUST IN: 🇮🇱🇹🇷🇸🇾🇨🇾 Israel Is Studying How To Strike Turkey Without Triggering NATO’s Article 5 THE TURKEY ISRAEL FLASHPOINT IS ESCALATING Israeli strategic thinking is examining whether Turkish forces operating outside Turkey’s territory, particularly in Syria, would be covered by NATO’s Article 5 if Israel attacked them. The analysis argues that Article 5 is not an automatic shield for Turkish military deployments abroad and that a clash with Turkish forces in Syria could create a major legal and strategic dilemma for NATO. The confrontation could extend beyond Syria. 🇹🇷 Turkey maintains a major military presence in northern Cyprus, while the Eastern Mediterranean is becoming an increasingly important arena in the growing Israel Turkey rivalry. Israel has already struck a Syrian airbase over concerns about a possible Turkish military deployment, bringing the two countries dangerously close to a direct military confrontation. 👀 If Israel and Turkey ever exchange fire in Syria, NATO could face one of its most explosive Article 5 dilemmas in decades.
0:37

JUST IN: 🇮🇱🇹🇷🇸🇾🇨🇾 Israel Is Studying How To Strike Turkey Without Triggering NATO’s Article 5 THE TURKEY ISRAEL FLASHPOINT IS ESCALATING Israeli strategic thinking is examining whether Turkish forces operating outside Turkey’s territory, particularly in Syria, would be covered by NATO’s Article 5 if Israel attacked them. The analysis argues that Article 5 is not an automatic shield for Turkish military deployments abroad and that a clash with Turkish forces in Syria could create a major legal and strategic dilemma for NATO. The confrontation could extend beyond Syria. 🇹🇷 Turkey maintains a major military presence in northern Cyprus, while the Eastern Mediterranean is becoming an increasingly important arena in the growing Israel Turkey rivalry. Israel has already struck a Syrian airbase over concerns about a possible Turkish military deployment, bringing the two countries dangerously close to a direct military confrontation. 👀 If Israel and Turkey ever exchange fire in Syria, NATO could face one of its most explosive Article 5 dilemmas in decades.

War Radar

21,063 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

🇹🇷🇮🇱🇸🇾⚡️ Israel’s latest strike in Syria appears to have carried a broader strategic message: Jerusalem intends to prevent both the rebuilding of Syria’s military capabilities and any expansion of Turkey’s military footprint that could restrict Israeli freedom of action. Eight strikes hit the Abu al-Duhur airbase in Idlib, damaging its runway and storage facilities. According to an Israeli official, the objective was to prevent Syrian military rearmament and deeper Turkish military entrenchment in the area. A Turkish source rejected that justification, insisting there were no Turkish forces stationed at the base and accusing Israel of manufacturing pretexts for attacks on neighboring states. The strike came shortly after a Turkish military delegation reportedly visited the facility as part of efforts connected to its rehabilitation. The episode highlights an increasingly important fault line in post-Assad Syria. Turkey wants to help rebuild Damascus’ military capacity and consolidate its influence, while Israel is determined to prevent Syria from developing capabilities that could constrain Israeli air operations. That puts two major U.S. partners on potentially conflicting strategic trajectories inside the same country, precisely why Washington publicly described the strike as an “unnecessary escalation.” See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:21

🇹🇷🇮🇱🇸🇾⚡️ Israel’s latest strike in Syria appears to have carried a broader strategic message: Jerusalem intends to prevent both the rebuilding of Syria’s military capabilities and any expansion of Turkey’s military footprint that could restrict Israeli freedom of action. Eight strikes hit the Abu al-Duhur airbase in Idlib, damaging its runway and storage facilities. According to an Israeli official, the objective was to prevent Syrian military rearmament and deeper Turkish military entrenchment in the area. A Turkish source rejected that justification, insisting there were no Turkish forces stationed at the base and accusing Israel of manufacturing pretexts for attacks on neighboring states. The strike came shortly after a Turkish military delegation reportedly visited the facility as part of efforts connected to its rehabilitation. The episode highlights an increasingly important fault line in post-Assad Syria. Turkey wants to help rebuild Damascus’ military capacity and consolidate its influence, while Israel is determined to prevent Syria from developing capabilities that could constrain Israeli air operations. That puts two major U.S. partners on potentially conflicting strategic trajectories inside the same country, precisely why Washington publicly described the strike as an “unnecessary escalation.” See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

25,393 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

ISRAEL ALMOST STARTED A WAR WITH TURKEY, AND NO ONE, NOT EVEN TRUMP, SAW IT COMING… Israel’s strike in Syria almost started a war with Turkey, and Trump’s Special Envoy just gave me an extraordinary account of how it happened According to Ambassador Tom Barrack, Israel received intelligence suggesting Turkey might be moving military assets onto a Syrian airbase. Washington checked, and confirmed it WAS NOT happening. The concern was communicated, the intelligence was examined, and Syria believed the issue was being handled through diplomatic channels, including a two-hour backchannel discussion between Syria’s foreign minister and the head of Mossad. Then jets appeared anyway, and Israel struck the runways without notifying either Washington or Turkey. That's where this stopped being another Israeli strike on Syria and became something potentially far more dangerous. Turkey saw the aircraft approaching and, not knowing their purpose or target, began confronting the possibility that it would have to scramble its own jets. It could have triggered a direct military confrontation between two of America’s most important regional partners, one of them a NATO member. Asked why Israel would take such a risk, Ambassador Barrack offered two theories. One was a catastrophic breakdown in communication between Mossad, the IDF and Netanyahu’s office. The other? “The Israelis were baiting the Turks.” My bet is on the latter… Behind all of this sits an even bigger strategic contest. Ambassador Barrack says Israel wants Syria kept clear of military systems that could interfere with its access to Iran, describing Syrian airspace as providing Israel with a “clear line of sight to Iran.” Turkey, meanwhile, is becoming increasingly entrenched as a military and political power inside the new Syria; so this wasn’t simply another airstrike. It was a glimpse of the fault line emerging underneath the post-Assad Middle East: Turkey wants to help build and secure the new Syria; Israel wants to ensure that Syria can never obstruct its freedom to strike Iran. For a few extremely dangerous moments, those two ambitions appear to have nearly met in the sky. And next time, cooler heads may not get there first. Ambassador Tom Barrack
51:15

ISRAEL ALMOST STARTED A WAR WITH TURKEY, AND NO ONE, NOT EVEN TRUMP, SAW IT COMING… Israel’s strike in Syria almost started a war with Turkey, and Trump’s Special Envoy just gave me an extraordinary account of how it happened According to Ambassador Tom Barrack, Israel received intelligence suggesting Turkey might be moving military assets onto a Syrian airbase. Washington checked, and confirmed it WAS NOT happening. The concern was communicated, the intelligence was examined, and Syria believed the issue was being handled through diplomatic channels, including a two-hour backchannel discussion between Syria’s foreign minister and the head of Mossad. Then jets appeared anyway, and Israel struck the runways without notifying either Washington or Turkey. That's where this stopped being another Israeli strike on Syria and became something potentially far more dangerous. Turkey saw the aircraft approaching and, not knowing their purpose or target, began confronting the possibility that it would have to scramble its own jets. It could have triggered a direct military confrontation between two of America’s most important regional partners, one of them a NATO member. Asked why Israel would take such a risk, Ambassador Barrack offered two theories. One was a catastrophic breakdown in communication between Mossad, the IDF and Netanyahu’s office. The other? “The Israelis were baiting the Turks.” My bet is on the latter… Behind all of this sits an even bigger strategic contest. Ambassador Barrack says Israel wants Syria kept clear of military systems that could interfere with its access to Iran, describing Syrian airspace as providing Israel with a “clear line of sight to Iran.” Turkey, meanwhile, is becoming increasingly entrenched as a military and political power inside the new Syria; so this wasn’t simply another airstrike. It was a glimpse of the fault line emerging underneath the post-Assad Middle East: Turkey wants to help build and secure the new Syria; Israel wants to ensure that Syria can never obstruct its freedom to strike Iran. For a few extremely dangerous moments, those two ambitions appear to have nearly met in the sky. And next time, cooler heads may not get there first. Ambassador Tom Barrack

Mario Nawfal

1,045,183 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

🇹🇷🇮🇱 Ana Kasparian discusses Israel’s reported strike on Turkish military equipment in Syria, an escalation that suddenly makes the prospect of a direct clash between Israel and NATO-member Turkey look less hypothetical. Her warning is blunt: Turkey’s military is formidable, and Israel may be creating a security environment in which more and more regional powers are pushed toward confrontation. “Turkey’s military is formidable, even more formidable than Iran’s.” With tensions already spreading across the region, this is one relationship worth watching very closely. Ana Kasparian
3:26

🇹🇷🇮🇱 Ana Kasparian discusses Israel’s reported strike on Turkish military equipment in Syria, an escalation that suddenly makes the prospect of a direct clash between Israel and NATO-member Turkey look less hypothetical. Her warning is blunt: Turkey’s military is formidable, and Israel may be creating a security environment in which more and more regional powers are pushed toward confrontation. “Turkey’s military is formidable, even more formidable than Iran’s.” With tensions already spreading across the region, this is one relationship worth watching very closely. Ana Kasparian

Mario Nawfal

106,394 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

Turkey may have assumed its NATO membership would deter Israel from striking its military assets in Syria. Israel appears to have found a way around that. The calculation is simple. Strike Turkish weapons and bases inside Syria when Turkish troops aren’t present, avoiding a direct attack on Turkey or its forces that could raise the question of NATO intervention. So far, the dynamic has been clear. Turkey moves weapons into Syria, Israel destroys them, and Ankara responds with rhetoric.
3:14

Turkey may have assumed its NATO membership would deter Israel from striking its military assets in Syria. Israel appears to have found a way around that. The calculation is simple. Strike Turkish weapons and bases inside Syria when Turkish troops aren’t present, avoiding a direct attack on Turkey or its forces that could raise the question of NATO intervention. So far, the dynamic has been clear. Turkey moves weapons into Syria, Israel destroys them, and Ankara responds with rhetoric.

Tousi TV

61,464 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

🚨🇷🇺⚠️ U.S. intelligence is reportedly warning that Putin could consider provoking a confrontation with NATO as early as this autumn. Analysts believe mounting pressure from the war in Ukraine may increase the risk of broader escalation. According to The Wall Street Journal, U.S. intelligence assessments suggest that Vladimir Putin could seek a confrontation with NATO in an attempt to demonstrate some form of military success as Russia remains bogged down in the war against Ukraine. The report says the window of heightened risk begins this autumn, with potential scenarios ranging from cyberattacks and hybrid operations to a limited cross-border ground incursion. While intelligence officials reportedly continue to assess the likelihood of a limited conventional military operation as relatively low, they warn that the risk could increase over time if the conflict in Ukraine continues to deteriorate for Moscow. The assessment underscores growing concern within Western security circles that Russia could seek to expand tensions beyond Ukraine if the Kremlin concludes that escalation offers greater strategic or political advantages. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:30

🚨🇷🇺⚠️ U.S. intelligence is reportedly warning that Putin could consider provoking a confrontation with NATO as early as this autumn. Analysts believe mounting pressure from the war in Ukraine may increase the risk of broader escalation. According to The Wall Street Journal, U.S. intelligence assessments suggest that Vladimir Putin could seek a confrontation with NATO in an attempt to demonstrate some form of military success as Russia remains bogged down in the war against Ukraine. The report says the window of heightened risk begins this autumn, with potential scenarios ranging from cyberattacks and hybrid operations to a limited cross-border ground incursion. While intelligence officials reportedly continue to assess the likelihood of a limited conventional military operation as relatively low, they warn that the risk could increase over time if the conflict in Ukraine continues to deteriorate for Moscow. The assessment underscores growing concern within Western security circles that Russia could seek to expand tensions beyond Ukraine if the Kremlin concludes that escalation offers greater strategic or political advantages. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

69,001 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

🇮🇱🇹🇷🇸🇾⚡️ Israel must stop Turkey’s military expansion before Turkish forces are able to establish themselves close to Israel’s borders, a senior Israeli intelligence official has warned as tensions between Jerusalem and Ankara over Syria continue to escalate. Speaking to The Jerusalem Post, the official warned that unless Israel establishes clear red lines in Syria and the eastern Mediterranean, Turkish military and naval forces could continue expanding their presence toward Israel. He cautioned that Israel could eventually face a scenario in which Turkish tanks are positioned near the Golan Heights and Turkish frigates operate off the coast of Caesarea. The warning reflects a growing concern within Israel that Turkey’s expanding influence in Syria could eventually become a direct strategic constraint on Israeli freedom of action. Recent Israeli strikes against military infrastructure in Syria therefore appear intended not only to limit Damascus’ capabilities, but also to signal that Jerusalem will resist any permanent Turkish military deployment it considers threatening. The emerging rivalry increasingly makes Syria one of the most sensitive potential flashpoints between Israel and Turkey. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:29

🇮🇱🇹🇷🇸🇾⚡️ Israel must stop Turkey’s military expansion before Turkish forces are able to establish themselves close to Israel’s borders, a senior Israeli intelligence official has warned as tensions between Jerusalem and Ankara over Syria continue to escalate. Speaking to The Jerusalem Post, the official warned that unless Israel establishes clear red lines in Syria and the eastern Mediterranean, Turkish military and naval forces could continue expanding their presence toward Israel. He cautioned that Israel could eventually face a scenario in which Turkish tanks are positioned near the Golan Heights and Turkish frigates operate off the coast of Caesarea. The warning reflects a growing concern within Israel that Turkey’s expanding influence in Syria could eventually become a direct strategic constraint on Israeli freedom of action. Recent Israeli strikes against military infrastructure in Syria therefore appear intended not only to limit Damascus’ capabilities, but also to signal that Jerusalem will resist any permanent Turkish military deployment it considers threatening. The emerging rivalry increasingly makes Syria one of the most sensitive potential flashpoints between Israel and Turkey. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

17,629 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

‼️‼️🇺🇸🇮🇱 A new point of friction may be emerging between Washington and Jerusalem, as reports claim the United States has presented Israel with demands to withdraw from Gaza, Syria, and Lebanon. According to KAN, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Israeli ministers that the U.S. had requested Israeli withdrawals from the three fronts, adding that he intends to reject the American demands. While neither government has officially detailed the reported discussions, the issue reportedly reflects growing differences over Israel's military posture and the future of its regional operations. If the report is accurate, it would signal one of the clearest strategic disagreements between the U.S. and Israel in recent months. Any sustained divergence over Gaza, Syria, and Lebanon could complicate future military coordination, even as both countries continue to view Iran and its regional allies as their primary long-term security challenge. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:30

‼️‼️🇺🇸🇮🇱 A new point of friction may be emerging between Washington and Jerusalem, as reports claim the United States has presented Israel with demands to withdraw from Gaza, Syria, and Lebanon. According to KAN, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Israeli ministers that the U.S. had requested Israeli withdrawals from the three fronts, adding that he intends to reject the American demands. While neither government has officially detailed the reported discussions, the issue reportedly reflects growing differences over Israel's military posture and the future of its regional operations. If the report is accurate, it would signal one of the clearest strategic disagreements between the U.S. and Israel in recent months. Any sustained divergence over Gaza, Syria, and Lebanon could complicate future military coordination, even as both countries continue to view Iran and its regional allies as their primary long-term security challenge. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

16,643 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 BREAKING: ISRAEL PREPARING MAJOR LEBANON OFFENSIVE Israel is reportedly preparing a large-scale ground operation in southern Lebanon, aimed at seizing the entire area south of the Litani River, according to reports. If launched, the operation could become Israel’s largest ground invasion of Lebanon since the 2006 war with Hezbollah. The objective would be to push Hezbollah forces north of the Litani and dismantle their military infrastructure threatening Israel’s northern border. Israeli forces have already been moving troops and equipment toward the northern front, suggesting preparations for a major escalation. If the operation goes ahead, the conflict could rapidly expand into a full regional confrontation.
0:32

🚨 BREAKING: ISRAEL PREPARING MAJOR LEBANON OFFENSIVE Israel is reportedly preparing a large-scale ground operation in southern Lebanon, aimed at seizing the entire area south of the Litani River, according to reports. If launched, the operation could become Israel’s largest ground invasion of Lebanon since the 2006 war with Hezbollah. The objective would be to push Hezbollah forces north of the Litani and dismantle their military infrastructure threatening Israel’s northern border. Israeli forces have already been moving troops and equipment toward the northern front, suggesting preparations for a major escalation. If the operation goes ahead, the conflict could rapidly expand into a full regional confrontation.

Jim Ferguson

20,052 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🇹🇷🇮🇱 BUCKLE UP: Tensions are rising on Israel’s northern border: Israel has warned Turkey against expanding its military presence in Syria, seeing it as an existential threat. Turkey denies the plans, but its push to become the leading Sunni power in the region makes the move strategically tempting. In my view, this situation is likely to develop into a serious point of friction between the countries. The one positive factor is that I believe Trump will be able to broker a peaceful resolution and manage the tensions effectively.........👀 📌Israeli Air Force F-35I Adirs take off from Nevatim Airbase:
0:41

🇹🇷🇮🇱 BUCKLE UP: Tensions are rising on Israel’s northern border: Israel has warned Turkey against expanding its military presence in Syria, seeing it as an existential threat. Turkey denies the plans, but its push to become the leading Sunni power in the region makes the move strategically tempting. In my view, this situation is likely to develop into a serious point of friction between the countries. The one positive factor is that I believe Trump will be able to broker a peaceful resolution and manage the tensions effectively.........👀 📌Israeli Air Force F-35I Adirs take off from Nevatim Airbase:

Global Strategy

76,911 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

🇹🇷🇮🇱 Turkish commanders watched Israeli jets fly toward their border without knowing the target, and chose not to fire Washington got no advance word on the Abu al-Duhur strike either, and cooler heads kept a direct Turkey-Israel exchange from starting. Ankara has the radars and the history, having downed a Russian jet in 2015. Afterward Turkey said it would not fall into the trap that was set. The strategic reasoning is real. Syrian airspace matters to Israeli operations against Iran, and a Syria with Turkish air defenses closes that corridor. Damascus, with no military left to speak of, was always going to source security from the neighbor who backed it. Now the region is rearranging around Israel. Syria is weighing whether to join the Mecca pact, Turkey has requested an Interpol notice on Netanyahu, and Washington is warming to Erdogan while pressing Israel to accept the Gaza plan. Brandon Weichert
42:27

🇹🇷🇮🇱 Turkish commanders watched Israeli jets fly toward their border without knowing the target, and chose not to fire Washington got no advance word on the Abu al-Duhur strike either, and cooler heads kept a direct Turkey-Israel exchange from starting. Ankara has the radars and the history, having downed a Russian jet in 2015. Afterward Turkey said it would not fall into the trap that was set. The strategic reasoning is real. Syrian airspace matters to Israeli operations against Iran, and a Syria with Turkish air defenses closes that corridor. Damascus, with no military left to speak of, was always going to source security from the neighbor who backed it. Now the region is rearranging around Israel. Syria is weighing whether to join the Mecca pact, Turkey has requested an Interpol notice on Netanyahu, and Washington is warming to Erdogan while pressing Israel to accept the Gaza plan. Brandon Weichert

Mario Nawfal

308,503 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 The United States is reportedly preparing for a large-scale military campaign against Iran that would go far beyond a limited retaliatory strike, according to Israeli outlet i24NEWS. The report states that Washington's preparations are not intended as a response to yesterday's attack, but rather as part of a broader, pre-planned military operation with significantly wider objectives. 🔹 According to the report, Israel is increasingly concerned that Iran could launch direct attacks against Israeli territory if upcoming U.S. operations cross what Tehran considers its strategic red lines. The reported preparations point to the possibility of a major escalation that could fundamentally reshape the regional security environment. If Washington moves beyond limited punitive strikes toward a sustained military campaign, Iran would likely face strong pressure to respond against both American and Israeli targets, increasing the risk that the conflict expands into a broader regional war involving multiple fronts and allied proxy forces. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:30

‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 The United States is reportedly preparing for a large-scale military campaign against Iran that would go far beyond a limited retaliatory strike, according to Israeli outlet i24NEWS. The report states that Washington's preparations are not intended as a response to yesterday's attack, but rather as part of a broader, pre-planned military operation with significantly wider objectives. 🔹 According to the report, Israel is increasingly concerned that Iran could launch direct attacks against Israeli territory if upcoming U.S. operations cross what Tehran considers its strategic red lines. The reported preparations point to the possibility of a major escalation that could fundamentally reshape the regional security environment. If Washington moves beyond limited punitive strikes toward a sustained military campaign, Iran would likely face strong pressure to respond against both American and Israeli targets, increasing the risk that the conflict expands into a broader regional war involving multiple fronts and allied proxy forces. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

50,596 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨🇮🇱🇮🇷 Israel is preparing for the possibility of acting against Iran without direct U.S. military participation. The IDF is reportedly keeping independent strike plans ready as Washington increasingly searches for a diplomatic path out of the conflict. According to Israel's Channel 13, Israel is preparing for independent military action against Iran if the United States decides against further escalation and moves toward ending its direct involvement in the conflict. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) continue to maintain operational plans for strikes against Iranian targets without U.S. participation, ensuring that Israel retains the ability to continue military pressure on Tehran regardless of Washington's final decision. The preparations come as the United States increasingly focuses on finding a diplomatic solution, creating the possibility that Washington and Jerusalem could pursue different approaches toward the next phase of the confrontation. Israel's position suggests that a U.S.-Iran diplomatic arrangement would not necessarily end the military confrontation. If Jerusalem concludes that Iran continues to pose an unacceptable strategic threat, it is preparing to preserve the option of acting independently. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:30

🚨🇮🇱🇮🇷 Israel is preparing for the possibility of acting against Iran without direct U.S. military participation. The IDF is reportedly keeping independent strike plans ready as Washington increasingly searches for a diplomatic path out of the conflict. According to Israel's Channel 13, Israel is preparing for independent military action against Iran if the United States decides against further escalation and moves toward ending its direct involvement in the conflict. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) continue to maintain operational plans for strikes against Iranian targets without U.S. participation, ensuring that Israel retains the ability to continue military pressure on Tehran regardless of Washington's final decision. The preparations come as the United States increasingly focuses on finding a diplomatic solution, creating the possibility that Washington and Jerusalem could pursue different approaches toward the next phase of the confrontation. Israel's position suggests that a U.S.-Iran diplomatic arrangement would not necessarily end the military confrontation. If Jerusalem concludes that Iran continues to pose an unacceptable strategic threat, it is preparing to preserve the option of acting independently. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

25,769 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

🚨 ERDOGAN’S ANTI-ISRAEL RHETORIC IS NOT THE FULL STORY 🚨 Erdogan attacks Netanyahu almost daily, and his speeches resonate across the Muslim world after the Gaza onslaught and the war of aggression against Iran. But beneath the theater, Turkey and Israel still share deep geopolitical overlap. In the South Caucasus, both operated through Azerbaijan against the Armenians of Artsakh: Turkey with military and political backing, Israel with weapons, surveillance technology, and intelligence cooperation. In energy, Azerbaijan supplies a major share of Israel’s crude oil, and much of it passes through Turkey via the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. In Syria, both Turkey and Israel violate Syrian sovereignty, expand their zones of influence, and avoid direct confrontation because a Turkish-Israeli war would fracture the American-led security architecture in the region. This is the reality behind the speeches. Turkey wants a neo-Ottoman sphere of influence. Israel wants military dominance and the expansion of the Greater Israel project. They compete. They clash. But they also understand the red lines. Because in geopolitics, rhetoric is for the public. Reality is written on the ground.
8:37

🚨 ERDOGAN’S ANTI-ISRAEL RHETORIC IS NOT THE FULL STORY 🚨 Erdogan attacks Netanyahu almost daily, and his speeches resonate across the Muslim world after the Gaza onslaught and the war of aggression against Iran. But beneath the theater, Turkey and Israel still share deep geopolitical overlap. In the South Caucasus, both operated through Azerbaijan against the Armenians of Artsakh: Turkey with military and political backing, Israel with weapons, surveillance technology, and intelligence cooperation. In energy, Azerbaijan supplies a major share of Israel’s crude oil, and much of it passes through Turkey via the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. In Syria, both Turkey and Israel violate Syrian sovereignty, expand their zones of influence, and avoid direct confrontation because a Turkish-Israeli war would fracture the American-led security architecture in the region. This is the reality behind the speeches. Turkey wants a neo-Ottoman sphere of influence. Israel wants military dominance and the expansion of the Greater Israel project. They compete. They clash. But they also understand the red lines. Because in geopolitics, rhetoric is for the public. Reality is written on the ground.

Kevork Almassian

54,689 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🇮🇱🇹🇷 Netanyahu has effectively admitted Israel bombed Syria as a warning to Turkey, and geopolitical analyst Malcolm Nance is concerned the next message could be much harder to control. The airbase Israel targeted was reportedly of interest to Ankara as a potential base of operations, and Netanyahu said Turkey's movement south was challenging the existing status quo, so Israel demonstrated its position through what he described as “kinetic” means. Malcolm says this is about something much bigger than one Syrian airfield. Israel wants freedom to operate across Syrian airspace without a serious military challenge. Turkey, meanwhile, is steadily expanding its influence over Damascus and wants a stable Syria increasingly integrated into its own security architecture. Those two visions of Syria are becoming incompatible. And Malcolm believes Israel is trying to establish its red lines now, before Turkish influence becomes too deeply entrenched to reverse. What worries him is the mentality behind it. Israel has become accustomed to using overwhelming airpower to impose red lines on much weaker regional opponents, but Turkey is an entirely different proposition. It has one of NATO's largest standing armies, a huge domestic defence industry, advanced drones and weapon systems, and the strategic depth to absorb attacks in a way Israel's traditional adversaries cannot. Malcolm also points to increasingly aggressive rhetoric from Israeli officials discussing confrontation with Turkish forces in Syria and even scenarios they believe could avoid triggering NATO's Article 5. Nobody seriously wants an Israel-Turkey war, but that's precisely what makes this dangerous. Israel believes it can bomb Turkey's ambitions in Syria without fighting Turkey itself. Malcolm's warning is that eventually Erdoğan may stop accepting that distinction. Malcolm Nance
49:53

🇮🇱🇹🇷 Netanyahu has effectively admitted Israel bombed Syria as a warning to Turkey, and geopolitical analyst Malcolm Nance is concerned the next message could be much harder to control. The airbase Israel targeted was reportedly of interest to Ankara as a potential base of operations, and Netanyahu said Turkey's movement south was challenging the existing status quo, so Israel demonstrated its position through what he described as “kinetic” means. Malcolm says this is about something much bigger than one Syrian airfield. Israel wants freedom to operate across Syrian airspace without a serious military challenge. Turkey, meanwhile, is steadily expanding its influence over Damascus and wants a stable Syria increasingly integrated into its own security architecture. Those two visions of Syria are becoming incompatible. And Malcolm believes Israel is trying to establish its red lines now, before Turkish influence becomes too deeply entrenched to reverse. What worries him is the mentality behind it. Israel has become accustomed to using overwhelming airpower to impose red lines on much weaker regional opponents, but Turkey is an entirely different proposition. It has one of NATO's largest standing armies, a huge domestic defence industry, advanced drones and weapon systems, and the strategic depth to absorb attacks in a way Israel's traditional adversaries cannot. Malcolm also points to increasingly aggressive rhetoric from Israeli officials discussing confrontation with Turkish forces in Syria and even scenarios they believe could avoid triggering NATO's Article 5. Nobody seriously wants an Israel-Turkey war, but that's precisely what makes this dangerous. Israel believes it can bomb Turkey's ambitions in Syria without fighting Turkey itself. Malcolm's warning is that eventually Erdoğan may stop accepting that distinction. Malcolm Nance

Mario Nawfal

253,569 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

CLEAN BREAK MEMO (1996) 🇮🇱🇺🇸 The "Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" is a 1996 policy paper crafted by a group led by Richard Perle for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, that said war should be waged on 7 middle eastern countries: Syria, Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan. The memo had contributions from figures like Douglas Feith and David Wurmser, who later influenced U.S. policy under the Bush administration. The memo, produced by the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, proposed a bold shift in Israel’s security strategy, rejecting the Oslo Accords’ “land for peace” model in favor of a proactive, militarized approach to ensure Israel’s regional dominance. It advocated abandoning negotiations with Palestinians, marginalizing Yasser Arafat, and pursuing regime change in Iraq to destabilize Syria and weaken Iran, thereby reshaping the Middle East’s power dynamics. The strategy emphasized preemptive actions, such as targeting Syria’s alleged weapons programs and supporting proxy forces, while fostering alliances with Jordan and Turkey. Critically, it urged Israel to align with U.S. interests, leveraging American military and political power to execute these goals. The memo influenced U.S. intervention in Iraq in 2003, as its authors, now in key U.S. roles, pushed for regime change, aligning with Israel’s goal of neutralizing regional threats. The memo’s legacy is its perceived role as a blueprint for destabilizing Middle Eastern governments, for the expansion of the state of Israel. Today, Israel is trying to get U.S. support to make a regime change in Iran, to complete their plan from the 90’s.
1:35

CLEAN BREAK MEMO (1996) 🇮🇱🇺🇸 The "Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" is a 1996 policy paper crafted by a group led by Richard Perle for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, that said war should be waged on 7 middle eastern countries: Syria, Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan. The memo had contributions from figures like Douglas Feith and David Wurmser, who later influenced U.S. policy under the Bush administration. The memo, produced by the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, proposed a bold shift in Israel’s security strategy, rejecting the Oslo Accords’ “land for peace” model in favor of a proactive, militarized approach to ensure Israel’s regional dominance. It advocated abandoning negotiations with Palestinians, marginalizing Yasser Arafat, and pursuing regime change in Iraq to destabilize Syria and weaken Iran, thereby reshaping the Middle East’s power dynamics. The strategy emphasized preemptive actions, such as targeting Syria’s alleged weapons programs and supporting proxy forces, while fostering alliances with Jordan and Turkey. Critically, it urged Israel to align with U.S. interests, leveraging American military and political power to execute these goals. The memo influenced U.S. intervention in Iraq in 2003, as its authors, now in key U.S. roles, pushed for regime change, aligning with Israel’s goal of neutralizing regional threats. The memo’s legacy is its perceived role as a blueprint for destabilizing Middle Eastern governments, for the expansion of the state of Israel. Today, Israel is trying to get U.S. support to make a regime change in Iran, to complete their plan from the 90’s.

Kacee Allen

105,721 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 LEADERSHIP TARGETED: Reports claim Iranian officials linked to violent crackdowns were among strike targets Claims are emerging that senior Iranian figures — including leadership and security officials — were targeted during the latest U.S.–Israel strike operations. Some reports suggest individuals connected to the brutal suppression of protests inside Iran may have been among those targeted. If verified, this would signal not only a military objective, but a political message — accountability for violence against civilians. At this stage, independent confirmation of specific individuals and outcomes remains limited. But the implications are significant. Stand by.
1:37

🚨 LEADERSHIP TARGETED: Reports claim Iranian officials linked to violent crackdowns were among strike targets Claims are emerging that senior Iranian figures — including leadership and security officials — were targeted during the latest U.S.–Israel strike operations. Some reports suggest individuals connected to the brutal suppression of protests inside Iran may have been among those targeted. If verified, this would signal not only a military objective, but a political message — accountability for violence against civilians. At this stage, independent confirmation of specific individuals and outcomes remains limited. But the implications are significant. Stand by.

Jim Ferguson

27,664 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz announced Operation “Roaring Lion,” carried out with the U.S. to strike Iranian targets, describing the campaign as necessary to counter an “immediate threat” to Israel’s security and global stability. Katz said Israel acted preemptively to stop Iran’s “extremist and murderous regime” from acquiring nuclear and advanced missile capabilities, praising Netanyahu, Trump, and Israeli military leaders for their coordination. He stressed the operation targets the Iranian regime, not its people, calling it a historic chance for Iranians to end repression. Warning against interference, he said any enemy would “pay a very heavy price,” urging the public to follow Home Front Command instructions and expressing confidence that Israel will prevail.
2:58

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz announced Operation “Roaring Lion,” carried out with the U.S. to strike Iranian targets, describing the campaign as necessary to counter an “immediate threat” to Israel’s security and global stability. Katz said Israel acted preemptively to stop Iran’s “extremist and murderous regime” from acquiring nuclear and advanced missile capabilities, praising Netanyahu, Trump, and Israeli military leaders for their coordination. He stressed the operation targets the Iranian regime, not its people, calling it a historic chance for Iranians to end repression. Warning against interference, he said any enemy would “pay a very heavy price,” urging the public to follow Home Front Command instructions and expressing confidence that Israel will prevail.

Open Source Intel

83,681 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🇮🇱🇹🇷 Israel’s military is already under severe strain, making a confrontation with Turkey in Syria far more dangerous than it may appear. Pravin Sawhney says Israel has also underestimated the wider strategic picture, while the U.S. is being forced to pull resources from the Pacific into West Asia after losing key logistical access. “The middle part is fighting the 21st century war for which you are not prepared.” His warning: Washington’s ability to fight a major war across multiple theaters may be far weaker than its reputation suggests. Pravin Sawhney
2:54

🇮🇱🇹🇷 Israel’s military is already under severe strain, making a confrontation with Turkey in Syria far more dangerous than it may appear. Pravin Sawhney says Israel has also underestimated the wider strategic picture, while the U.S. is being forced to pull resources from the Pacific into West Asia after losing key logistical access. “The middle part is fighting the 21st century war for which you are not prepared.” His warning: Washington’s ability to fight a major war across multiple theaters may be far weaker than its reputation suggests. Pravin Sawhney

Mario Nawfal

47,968 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce