Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

‼️Benny Johnson is Lying PIG.🤥🐖 Multiple people who were actually inside the courtroom today — including Billie Webb , ELIZABETH LANE , and Brandi Siciliani — have confirmed that what Benny is claiming is false. Benny said they played “high definition 4K video” where you could clearly see Tyler...

ProjectConstitu's profile picture

Project Constitution

293,698 subscribers

86,456 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

‼️EXPOSED: Candace Owens DESTROYS Benny Johnson for LYING About the Tyler Robinson Prelim Video😱 Candace Owens came back swinging tonight and directly called out Benny Johnson for lying about the video shown in Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing. Benny claimed that Exhibit 12.1 was high-definition 4K footage that clearly showed Tyler Robinson taking the shot and even revealed the license plate on his Charger. Candace broke it down and explained that 12.1 is simply an enhanced and zoomed-in version of footage that was already played on Day 2 (Exhibit 12.4). She pointed out that even with the zooming and red circles, the video still does not clearly show anyone taking the shot. The person on the roof remains a blurry pixel, and there is no clear identification. She called this coordinated push a psychological operation and said influencers were given a script to convince the public that overwhelming evidence was shown in court. Candace made it clear she’s not backing down and won’t sit back while people betray Charlie Kirk for access and money. This is a war for your mind. And Candace just made it known she’s ready for it. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇 CC: Benny Johnson
12:21

‼️EXPOSED: Candace Owens DESTROYS Benny Johnson for LYING About the Tyler Robinson Prelim Video😱 Candace Owens came back swinging tonight and directly called out Benny Johnson for lying about the video shown in Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing. Benny claimed that Exhibit 12.1 was high-definition 4K footage that clearly showed Tyler Robinson taking the shot and even revealed the license plate on his Charger. Candace broke it down and explained that 12.1 is simply an enhanced and zoomed-in version of footage that was already played on Day 2 (Exhibit 12.4). She pointed out that even with the zooming and red circles, the video still does not clearly show anyone taking the shot. The person on the roof remains a blurry pixel, and there is no clear identification. She called this coordinated push a psychological operation and said influencers were given a script to convince the public that overwhelming evidence was shown in court. Candace made it clear she’s not backing down and won’t sit back while people betray Charlie Kirk for access and money. This is a war for your mind. And Candace just made it known she’s ready for it. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇 CC: Benny Johnson

Project Constitution

44,721 views • 3 days ago

‼️LEAKED: Video From Tyler Robinson Hearing Shows What Was Actually Played In Court On Day 5 — This Is The Video They Didn’t Want The Public To See👀 This is the footage that was shown inside the courtroom on the final day but was deliberately kept off the public livestream. It’s nothing more than a zoomed-in version of Exhibit 12.1 — the same video they already played on Day 2. I cropped and zoomed it in so everyone can see exactly what was shown. Brandon Tatum Benny Johnson Jack Posobiec Erika Kirk Is this the “crystal clear 4K” video where you could supposedly see Tyler Robinson’s face? Because even zoomed in, the person’s face is still blurry, distant, and half the time turned away or looking down. There is zero high-quality footage here that allows for a positive identification. The prosecution can keep claiming it’s Tyler Robinson, but the actual video doesn’t back that up. So tell me — was this really the smoking gun evidence you all claimed it was? Or were you just repeating whatever narrative they wanted pushed? CC: Candace Owens Baron Coleman
2:13

‼️LEAKED: Video From Tyler Robinson Hearing Shows What Was Actually Played In Court On Day 5 — This Is The Video They Didn’t Want The Public To See👀 This is the footage that was shown inside the courtroom on the final day but was deliberately kept off the public livestream. It’s nothing more than a zoomed-in version of Exhibit 12.1 — the same video they already played on Day 2. I cropped and zoomed it in so everyone can see exactly what was shown. Brandon Tatum Benny Johnson Jack Posobiec Erika Kirk Is this the “crystal clear 4K” video where you could supposedly see Tyler Robinson’s face? Because even zoomed in, the person’s face is still blurry, distant, and half the time turned away or looking down. There is zero high-quality footage here that allows for a positive identification. The prosecution can keep claiming it’s Tyler Robinson, but the actual video doesn’t back that up. So tell me — was this really the smoking gun evidence you all claimed it was? Or were you just repeating whatever narrative they wanted pushed? CC: Candace Owens Baron Coleman

Project Constitution

156,692 views • 5 days ago

MUST WATCH: Benny Johnson discusses the current evidence presented in the affidavit in the case against Tyler Robinson. -DNA evidence on the rifle, towel, and -Parents recognizing and allegedly turning their son in to authorities. -Alleged videos of Tyler Robinson on campus. I believe Benny Johnson is a genuine and sincere voice. He understands why there is so much division, so many questions, and many conspiracies. He even addresses why this is and that 3 letter agencies have a tendency to lie to the American people. Benny says he wishes there was more transparency in this case, which is leading to a lot of concern and speculation. Tucker and Candace are mentioned by name by Benny, but not hostility or in adamant condemnation. He even says the hate and division is not good for the movement and that Charlie wouldn't have liked any of it. This is wisdom, whether you agree with him on who you believe murdered Charlie Kirk or not.
15:39

MUST WATCH: Benny Johnson discusses the current evidence presented in the affidavit in the case against Tyler Robinson. -DNA evidence on the rifle, towel, and -Parents recognizing and allegedly turning their son in to authorities. -Alleged videos of Tyler Robinson on campus. I believe Benny Johnson is a genuine and sincere voice. He understands why there is so much division, so many questions, and many conspiracies. He even addresses why this is and that 3 letter agencies have a tendency to lie to the American people. Benny says he wishes there was more transparency in this case, which is leading to a lot of concern and speculation. Tucker and Candace are mentioned by name by Benny, but not hostility or in adamant condemnation. He even says the hate and division is not good for the movement and that Charlie wouldn't have liked any of it. This is wisdom, whether you agree with him on who you believe murdered Charlie Kirk or not.

Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸

79,530 views • 7 months ago

The TPUSA shills are *lying* to you! There was no “high quality, conclusive video showing Tyler taking the shot” shown today! I was outside the courthouse all week, but Billie Webb & Brandi Siciliani were inside & saw the videos. They insist the vids were blurry & you cannot see a trigger pull or “Tyler’s face.” Total misrepresentation from Jack P, Tatum, Benny, and whoever else will be spinning this. I suspect THIS is likely a major reason why they were there: to spread a false narrative bc the case is WEAK AF. If only I’d known this when I interviewed them afterward, I would have asked directly why they’re spreading lies & mischaracterizing evidence.
2:00

The TPUSA shills are *lying* to you! There was no “high quality, conclusive video showing Tyler taking the shot” shown today! I was outside the courthouse all week, but Billie Webb & Brandi Siciliani were inside & saw the videos. They insist the vids were blurry & you cannot see a trigger pull or “Tyler’s face.” Total misrepresentation from Jack P, Tatum, Benny, and whoever else will be spinning this. I suspect THIS is likely a major reason why they were there: to spread a false narrative bc the case is WEAK AF. If only I’d known this when I interviewed them afterward, I would have asked directly why they’re spreading lies & mischaracterizing evidence.

Keli Rabon

40,746 views • 6 days ago

🔥"Jimmy Kimmel didn't cry fo CHARLIE KIRK, he didn't cry for his children that will never see their FATHER again, Jimmy Kimmel didn't cry for Erika Kirk who will never see her HUSBAND again or this nation which I BELIEVE LOST A FUTURE PRESIDENT...Instead Jimmy Kimmel mocked Erika Kirk, mocked the MAGA Movement & lied about his assassin....JIMMY KIMMEL ONLY CRIED WHEN HIS CAREER WAS UNDER THREAT." - Benny Johnson Benny Johnson joins Lara Trump and brings up the previous clip with Ilhan Omar stating "Its a shame he died in that way." Benny says is there OTHER WAYS? Benny discusses the paradox to how we on the right react to traumatic events vs the left. Benny says The way the right reacted was PRAYER & MORNING. The Secret Service told him weren't scared of the 300k MAGA supporters..they were afraid of 1 leftist. "CHICAGO IS A CITY THAT DESERVES TO BE SAVED." Benny talks about being in Chicago with the DHS riding along with Sec. Kristi Noem and they arrested ILLEGAL ALIENS THEMSELVES. He notes that is the governor & the mayor BREAKING THE LAW while it is President Trump trying to enforce the law. Benny & Lara then discuss the attempt to TURN CALIFORNIA RED. He uses Wisconsin to highlight how when there was a referendum to mandate VOTER ID they voted for Republicans and NOW HAVE CLEAN ELECTIONS. Benny makes a great note that the most amount of Republicans actually reside in California and they are attempting..... along with Nicole Shanahan ... bring a referendum SO THAT VOTED ID IS REQUIRED TO VOTE. This is how things change for the better.
6:35

🔥"Jimmy Kimmel didn't cry fo CHARLIE KIRK, he didn't cry for his children that will never see their FATHER again, Jimmy Kimmel didn't cry for Erika Kirk who will never see her HUSBAND again or this nation which I BELIEVE LOST A FUTURE PRESIDENT...Instead Jimmy Kimmel mocked Erika Kirk, mocked the MAGA Movement & lied about his assassin....JIMMY KIMMEL ONLY CRIED WHEN HIS CAREER WAS UNDER THREAT." - Benny Johnson Benny Johnson joins Lara Trump and brings up the previous clip with Ilhan Omar stating "Its a shame he died in that way." Benny says is there OTHER WAYS? Benny discusses the paradox to how we on the right react to traumatic events vs the left. Benny says The way the right reacted was PRAYER & MORNING. The Secret Service told him weren't scared of the 300k MAGA supporters..they were afraid of 1 leftist. "CHICAGO IS A CITY THAT DESERVES TO BE SAVED." Benny talks about being in Chicago with the DHS riding along with Sec. Kristi Noem and they arrested ILLEGAL ALIENS THEMSELVES. He notes that is the governor & the mayor BREAKING THE LAW while it is President Trump trying to enforce the law. Benny & Lara then discuss the attempt to TURN CALIFORNIA RED. He uses Wisconsin to highlight how when there was a referendum to mandate VOTER ID they voted for Republicans and NOW HAVE CLEAN ELECTIONS. Benny makes a great note that the most amount of Republicans actually reside in California and they are attempting..... along with Nicole Shanahan ... bring a referendum SO THAT VOTED ID IS REQUIRED TO VOTE. This is how things change for the better.

Johnny St.Pete

145,322 views • 9 months ago

HOLY SH*T 🤯 They have zoomed up footage of Tyler Robinson lying prone in a sniper’s position on the UVU rooftop taking the shot at Charlie Kirk‼️ Despite the false reports from Candace Owens cultists Erika Kirk and Charlie’s mother were seen crying and clinging to one another as the video was played Also important to note that the footage played in court was better quality than what we have seen on social media.
1:23

HOLY SH*T 🤯 They have zoomed up footage of Tyler Robinson lying prone in a sniper’s position on the UVU rooftop taking the shot at Charlie Kirk‼️ Despite the false reports from Candace Owens cultists Erika Kirk and Charlie’s mother were seen crying and clinging to one another as the video was played Also important to note that the footage played in court was better quality than what we have seen on social media.

Cinema Shogun

72,061 views • 6 days ago

🔥WOW. THIS IS SURREAL. Nick Sortor join Benny Johnson to explain that he was been threatened with being “Charlie Kirked” by Antifa and tell Benny Johnson a story caught on video where he was PUNCHED BY A TRANS ANTIFA member and THEY WERE NOT ARRESTED. Nick Sortor goes on to explain that HE was arrested and initially believed it was a way do depressurize the situation and was for show to remove him from the scene. Welp it turns out NOPE he was ACTUALLY being arrested for taking video it appears. Benny notes he initially believed also that this was just a method similar like what was done with Jack Poso 🇺🇸 to lower the temperature. Benny says he is worried for Nick’s safety and reminds the audience of when a MAGA hat wearing supporter was shot point blank in Portland. That’s correct it occurred in 20202 & his name was Jay Danielson. Benny also notes at one point ICE considered deploying to the jail Nick was being held to protect him. It’s REMARKABLE that this is being permitted in an AMERICAN CITY IN 2025z
7:23

🔥WOW. THIS IS SURREAL. Nick Sortor join Benny Johnson to explain that he was been threatened with being “Charlie Kirked” by Antifa and tell Benny Johnson a story caught on video where he was PUNCHED BY A TRANS ANTIFA member and THEY WERE NOT ARRESTED. Nick Sortor goes on to explain that HE was arrested and initially believed it was a way do depressurize the situation and was for show to remove him from the scene. Welp it turns out NOPE he was ACTUALLY being arrested for taking video it appears. Benny notes he initially believed also that this was just a method similar like what was done with Jack Poso 🇺🇸 to lower the temperature. Benny says he is worried for Nick’s safety and reminds the audience of when a MAGA hat wearing supporter was shot point blank in Portland. That’s correct it occurred in 20202 & his name was Jay Danielson. Benny also notes at one point ICE considered deploying to the jail Nick was being held to protect him. It’s REMARKABLE that this is being permitted in an AMERICAN CITY IN 2025z

Johnny St.Pete

51,028 views • 9 months ago

No one witnessed Tyler Robinson. No video or any witness testimony of him, a gun, or any forensic evidence at all. Except dna on a rifle he owned that wasn’t tested for residue and did not alert any of the dogs. The footage never shows a gun or a clear shot of his face. It appears to be multiple people or he changes outfits. There is no evidence matching any bullet to the gun they claim was used. The only “evidence” they have are text messages that don’t sound real that have not been made available to the defense to analyze. Text messages can be sent by anyone. That isn’t evidence. And a confession that doesn’t exist and a claim his mother recognized him from the footage that we now can all see. That statement has not been made available and probably doesn’t exist, and it doesn’t matter. The video doesn’t show any crime and it’s not clear enough for any positive ID. There are mountains of circumstantial evidence that turning point USA conspired to either kill Charlie Kirk or cover up his murder. There is an end times cult that is convinced that in order to bring back Jesus they need the US to lose to Iran and the world to turn on Israel and burn. That’s a fact btw. That’s what Ben Shapiro and Trump and kushner and the “pastors” surrounding Charlie believe. They are claiming anyone that is NOT in their world destroying death cult is in fact in Candace Owens cult. People who don’t think Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk and Erika is a crazy bitch. Everything I just said is obviously accurate. It never ends well for death cults. This is not the first and it’s not the last. I recommend staying far far away as they destroy themselves
1:26

No one witnessed Tyler Robinson. No video or any witness testimony of him, a gun, or any forensic evidence at all. Except dna on a rifle he owned that wasn’t tested for residue and did not alert any of the dogs. The footage never shows a gun or a clear shot of his face. It appears to be multiple people or he changes outfits. There is no evidence matching any bullet to the gun they claim was used. The only “evidence” they have are text messages that don’t sound real that have not been made available to the defense to analyze. Text messages can be sent by anyone. That isn’t evidence. And a confession that doesn’t exist and a claim his mother recognized him from the footage that we now can all see. That statement has not been made available and probably doesn’t exist, and it doesn’t matter. The video doesn’t show any crime and it’s not clear enough for any positive ID. There are mountains of circumstantial evidence that turning point USA conspired to either kill Charlie Kirk or cover up his murder. There is an end times cult that is convinced that in order to bring back Jesus they need the US to lose to Iran and the world to turn on Israel and burn. That’s a fact btw. That’s what Ben Shapiro and Trump and kushner and the “pastors” surrounding Charlie believe. They are claiming anyone that is NOT in their world destroying death cult is in fact in Candace Owens cult. People who don’t think Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk and Erika is a crazy bitch. Everything I just said is obviously accurate. It never ends well for death cults. This is not the first and it’s not the last. I recommend staying far far away as they destroy themselves

Owen Benjamin 🐻

71,429 views • 8 days ago

Yesterday, a number of journalists who attended the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing reported that clear video evidence of Tyler taking the shot from the roof was presented. The video was not shown to the public because of the judge’s order (due to the clerical error of showing Tyler Robinson’s alleged confession note the day before). Immediately, other journalists who were also in attendance reported that the video did NOT show Tyler Robinson taking the shot, and that those journalists were lying, repeating “fed slop”. The reality is that both journalists are correct. The video (which was merely enhanced video of segments the public had already seen) showed the man *identified* as Tyler on the roof, in the prone position, taking the shot, and then fleeing. It did not show his face (I verified with a couple of people in respect of their posts). So on the one hand, you have journalists reporting that the video clearly showed the man *who had been previously identified as Tyler Robinson* taking the shot. And on the other hand, you have journalist saying the video did not show Tyler specifically (in terms of close-up on his face for facial recognition). This is the exact confusion and spin I specifically predicted would happen during my appearance on Megyn Kelly that morning. Had the public seen the video, there would have been no confusion in what was meant by the various reports. But the judge, in his order denying transparency to the judicial process, allowed for this confusion to occur and be weaponized to taint the entire judicial process. The judge, in his idiotic ruling to not display exhibits on the final day of the hearing, in an effort to split the judicial baby to please both parties, killed the judicial baby.
1:47

Yesterday, a number of journalists who attended the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing reported that clear video evidence of Tyler taking the shot from the roof was presented. The video was not shown to the public because of the judge’s order (due to the clerical error of showing Tyler Robinson’s alleged confession note the day before). Immediately, other journalists who were also in attendance reported that the video did NOT show Tyler Robinson taking the shot, and that those journalists were lying, repeating “fed slop”. The reality is that both journalists are correct. The video (which was merely enhanced video of segments the public had already seen) showed the man *identified* as Tyler on the roof, in the prone position, taking the shot, and then fleeing. It did not show his face (I verified with a couple of people in respect of their posts). So on the one hand, you have journalists reporting that the video clearly showed the man *who had been previously identified as Tyler Robinson* taking the shot. And on the other hand, you have journalist saying the video did not show Tyler specifically (in terms of close-up on his face for facial recognition). This is the exact confusion and spin I specifically predicted would happen during my appearance on Megyn Kelly that morning. Had the public seen the video, there would have been no confusion in what was meant by the various reports. But the judge, in his order denying transparency to the judicial process, allowed for this confusion to occur and be weaponized to taint the entire judicial process. The judge, in his idiotic ruling to not display exhibits on the final day of the hearing, in an effort to split the judicial baby to please both parties, killed the judicial baby.

Viva Frei

146,428 views • 5 days ago

Candace Owens now says there were MULTIPLE "Tyler Robinson's" used to mislead the public on who ACTUALLY killed Charlie. She built a whole narrative around his assassination, and now that more evidence is coming out in court, she’s not correcting herself, she’s inventing new conspiracies to avoid admitting she was wrong. At what point does “just asking questions” become knowingly misleading people? This is actually evil.
2:51

Candace Owens now says there were MULTIPLE "Tyler Robinson's" used to mislead the public on who ACTUALLY killed Charlie. She built a whole narrative around his assassination, and now that more evidence is coming out in court, she’s not correcting herself, she’s inventing new conspiracies to avoid admitting she was wrong. At what point does “just asking questions” become knowingly misleading people? This is actually evil.

The Moderate Case

25,725 views • 2 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: High-quality surveillance video has just been shown in court showing Tyler Robinson TAKING THE SHOT at Charlie Kirk Robinson is SCREWED. He’s now on his way back to his cage, via a HEAVILY armed escort. Press were not allowed to stream the video. Only those in the courtroom, including members of the public and family members, were allowed to see the video. This week was an absolute BEATDOWN for the defense. The death penalty is staring him directly in the eyes. Next hearing is set for September 1st here in Utah
1:13

🚨 BREAKING: High-quality surveillance video has just been shown in court showing Tyler Robinson TAKING THE SHOT at Charlie Kirk Robinson is SCREWED. He’s now on his way back to his cage, via a HEAVILY armed escort. Press were not allowed to stream the video. Only those in the courtroom, including members of the public and family members, were allowed to see the video. This week was an absolute BEATDOWN for the defense. The death penalty is staring him directly in the eyes. Next hearing is set for September 1st here in Utah

Nick Sortor

3,423,962 views • 6 days ago

‼️Candace Owens Just PROVED There Is More EVIDENCE Supporting the Exploding Mic Theory Than the Official “Tyler Robinson LONE GUNMAN” Narrative😱 Candace Owens laid it out clearly tonight: when you actually look at the evidence, there is more supporting the theory that Charlie Kirk was killed by a rigged explosive device in his microphone than there is supporting the FBI’s claim that Tyler Robinson shot him from a rooftop. She walked through several key points: Bomb dogs were on scene but were never taken to where Charlie was sitting. The crime scene was paved over just days later (on a Sunday), which would destroy any trace chemical evidence from an explosive. A 30-06 bullet would have likely decapitated Charlie, not left him with a clean entry wound and no exit wound. Shards of hard plastic consistent with a shattered Rode wireless microphone were found inside the SUV that carried Charlie to the hospital. The SUV was quickly towed, cleaned, and resold — destroying what should have been a major piece of evidence. Terrell Farnsworth was specifically told to remove the SD card from the camera positioned directly behind Charlie. Meanwhile, the official story relies heavily on grainy footage and a narrative that keeps falling apart under scrutiny. Candace also noted that Turning Point USA and Erika Kirk have shown almost zero interest in actually investigating these inconsistencies. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT this, and watch her full episode linked below. The official story has less evidence than the theory they’re trying to dismiss. ⚠️My channel is under coordinated attack to bankrupt and silence this investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. DONATE Here:
18:41

‼️Candace Owens Just PROVED There Is More EVIDENCE Supporting the Exploding Mic Theory Than the Official “Tyler Robinson LONE GUNMAN” Narrative😱 Candace Owens laid it out clearly tonight: when you actually look at the evidence, there is more supporting the theory that Charlie Kirk was killed by a rigged explosive device in his microphone than there is supporting the FBI’s claim that Tyler Robinson shot him from a rooftop. She walked through several key points: Bomb dogs were on scene but were never taken to where Charlie was sitting. The crime scene was paved over just days later (on a Sunday), which would destroy any trace chemical evidence from an explosive. A 30-06 bullet would have likely decapitated Charlie, not left him with a clean entry wound and no exit wound. Shards of hard plastic consistent with a shattered Rode wireless microphone were found inside the SUV that carried Charlie to the hospital. The SUV was quickly towed, cleaned, and resold — destroying what should have been a major piece of evidence. Terrell Farnsworth was specifically told to remove the SD card from the camera positioned directly behind Charlie. Meanwhile, the official story relies heavily on grainy footage and a narrative that keeps falling apart under scrutiny. Candace also noted that Turning Point USA and Erika Kirk have shown almost zero interest in actually investigating these inconsistencies. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT this, and watch her full episode linked below. The official story has less evidence than the theory they’re trying to dismiss. ⚠️My channel is under coordinated attack to bankrupt and silence this investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. DONATE Here:

Project Constitution

27,346 views • 1 month ago

🔥Wow. On the J6 Pipe bomber story Benny Johnson states he has GREAT contacts in the federal government that are forthcoming on stories before they break to prepare the audience but IN THIS CASE “GOOSE EGGS” & Benny states “Why has nobody talked to us about that..EVERYBODY SAYING NOTHING MEANS THERE IS SOMETHING” “Look Benny I’m not a conspiracy theorist..I don’t have a tin foil hat but I THINK THERE IS SOMETHING DEEPER TO THIS & THAT SOMEONE IN THE GOVT KNOWS WHO THIS IS” -Corey R. Lewandowski Corey joins Benny Johnson to discuss the J6 Pipe bomber story from Steve Baker & the blaze on believe they have identified the perpetrator. Corey is correct that if they could find everyone the desired with geo fencing of cellphones within a 3 mile radius but in this case they cannot. I said yesterday whispers of this break must have been going around for a week or so and it’s no coincidence that Nancy Pelosi is suddenly retiring.
12:47

🔥Wow. On the J6 Pipe bomber story Benny Johnson states he has GREAT contacts in the federal government that are forthcoming on stories before they break to prepare the audience but IN THIS CASE “GOOSE EGGS” & Benny states “Why has nobody talked to us about that..EVERYBODY SAYING NOTHING MEANS THERE IS SOMETHING” “Look Benny I’m not a conspiracy theorist..I don’t have a tin foil hat but I THINK THERE IS SOMETHING DEEPER TO THIS & THAT SOMEONE IN THE GOVT KNOWS WHO THIS IS” -Corey R. Lewandowski Corey joins Benny Johnson to discuss the J6 Pipe bomber story from Steve Baker & the blaze on believe they have identified the perpetrator. Corey is correct that if they could find everyone the desired with geo fencing of cellphones within a 3 mile radius but in this case they cannot. I said yesterday whispers of this break must have been going around for a week or so and it’s no coincidence that Nancy Pelosi is suddenly retiring.

Johnny St.Pete

75,463 views • 8 months ago

🔥“It’s amazing to me that their are people now attacking the evidence & they can play those games but eventually this is gonna be released publicly” -Jack Posobiec Jack says a lot of people took the wrong side on this and have a bias & “If you are explaining your losing” and the SHEET VOLUME of evidence this week seems insurmountable. Jack also says people were also saying Tyler Robinson wasn’t laughing and he SAW WITH HIS OWN RYES this even before reporters themselves tweeted it out. Nick Sortor says asks at what point is it the standard that people have 8K and previously people were saying there was no video yet here it is. He also says ERIKA KIRK was pushing it for the video to be released but it was the defense & Judge who would not allow it. Jack says if you following the video of the person going up the stairwell LOGICALLY it’s clearly going to be same person on the roof.
4:47

🔥“It’s amazing to me that their are people now attacking the evidence & they can play those games but eventually this is gonna be released publicly” -Jack Posobiec Jack says a lot of people took the wrong side on this and have a bias & “If you are explaining your losing” and the SHEET VOLUME of evidence this week seems insurmountable. Jack also says people were also saying Tyler Robinson wasn’t laughing and he SAW WITH HIS OWN RYES this even before reporters themselves tweeted it out. Nick Sortor says asks at what point is it the standard that people have 8K and previously people were saying there was no video yet here it is. He also says ERIKA KIRK was pushing it for the video to be released but it was the defense & Judge who would not allow it. Jack says if you following the video of the person going up the stairwell LOGICALLY it’s clearly going to be same person on the roof.

Johnny St.Pete

20,063 views • 6 days ago

🚨 Candace Owens is doubling down on her ridiculous “body double” theory‼️ Candace continues to say that Tyler Robinson wasn’t on UVU campus the day Charlie was killed. BUT THERE’S A PROBLEM. Tyler was caught on security cameras all around UVU that day. Candace doesn’t actually believe the body double nonsense. She just knows the trial is getting closer and her lies will be exposed so she hopes to hide behind the excuse that all of the video evidence is actually Tyler Robinson body doubles and not him. This is how low she’s willing to sink instead of just admitting she was wrong/lied. So just in case you’re not keeping track: They now believe that Charlie was killed by an exploding microphone that left a wound similar to a gun shot. But they refuse to believe Charlie was shot. And they also believe that Charlie was killed by a Tyler Robinson body double. But they refuse to believe Charlie was killed by Tyler Robinson. So after 9 straight months this is the best these idiots can do. Anything to avoid believing in the truth.
0:22

🚨 Candace Owens is doubling down on her ridiculous “body double” theory‼️ Candace continues to say that Tyler Robinson wasn’t on UVU campus the day Charlie was killed. BUT THERE’S A PROBLEM. Tyler was caught on security cameras all around UVU that day. Candace doesn’t actually believe the body double nonsense. She just knows the trial is getting closer and her lies will be exposed so she hopes to hide behind the excuse that all of the video evidence is actually Tyler Robinson body doubles and not him. This is how low she’s willing to sink instead of just admitting she was wrong/lied. So just in case you’re not keeping track: They now believe that Charlie was killed by an exploding microphone that left a wound similar to a gun shot. But they refuse to believe Charlie was shot. And they also believe that Charlie was killed by a Tyler Robinson body double. But they refuse to believe Charlie was killed by Tyler Robinson. So after 9 straight months this is the best these idiots can do. Anything to avoid believing in the truth.

Cinema Shogun

19,276 views • 16 days ago

‼️SHOCKING: Candace Owens Calls Out Erika Kirk’s PR Stunt At Tyler Robinson’s Hearing 👀 Candace Owens is back and she didn’t hold back. In her first episode since returning from vacation, she called out Erika Kirk for turning Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing into a PR event by inviting social media influencers into the courthouse. According to Candace, Erika specifically requested the presence of people like Benny Johnson, Graham Allen, and Brandon Tatum — the same influencers who were not invited to Charlie Kirk’s private funeral. Candace pointed out that the truth doesn’t need a marketing campaign, and inviting influencers to a courtroom while the man she claims to have loved was assassinated raises serious questions about her intentions. She also dropped another major point, calling out Ben Shapiro for admitting he was receiving minute-by-minute updates from someone inside Charlie’s car while he was bleeding out and being rushed to the hospital. Candace stated that for those who believe Israel was involved in Charlie’s assassination, this detail does nothing to clear up those suspicions. This is getting harder and harder to ignore. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇
3:00

‼️SHOCKING: Candace Owens Calls Out Erika Kirk’s PR Stunt At Tyler Robinson’s Hearing 👀 Candace Owens is back and she didn’t hold back. In her first episode since returning from vacation, she called out Erika Kirk for turning Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing into a PR event by inviting social media influencers into the courthouse. According to Candace, Erika specifically requested the presence of people like Benny Johnson, Graham Allen, and Brandon Tatum — the same influencers who were not invited to Charlie Kirk’s private funeral. Candace pointed out that the truth doesn’t need a marketing campaign, and inviting influencers to a courtroom while the man she claims to have loved was assassinated raises serious questions about her intentions. She also dropped another major point, calling out Ben Shapiro for admitting he was receiving minute-by-minute updates from someone inside Charlie’s car while he was bleeding out and being rushed to the hospital. Candace stated that for those who believe Israel was involved in Charlie’s assassination, this detail does nothing to clear up those suspicions. This is getting harder and harder to ignore. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

76,314 views • 3 days ago

🚨 JUST NOW: Benny Johnson NAILS IT after a man was caught plotting to bomb "Christian nationalists" and Erika Kirk at TPUSA "America is a Christian NATION." "When you hear an attack on Christian nationalists, what they're actually attacking is America ITSELF and the breakdown that we've seen in our society over the last 60 years in trust and in order and in cleanliness and in safety has been because our nation was founded as a Christian nation." "That is verifiably and empirically true. It is wholly inadequate, as John Adams said, for any other people other than a moral and religious people." "The foundations, the very bedrock of this nation, is based entirely, entirely upon Christian principles, not some type of French enlightenment, not anything secular. It is based on Christ himself and the founders believe that." Benny Johnson Kayleigh McEnany Saturday in America
2:12

🚨 JUST NOW: Benny Johnson NAILS IT after a man was caught plotting to bomb "Christian nationalists" and Erika Kirk at TPUSA "America is a Christian NATION." "When you hear an attack on Christian nationalists, what they're actually attacking is America ITSELF and the breakdown that we've seen in our society over the last 60 years in trust and in order and in cleanliness and in safety has been because our nation was founded as a Christian nation." "That is verifiably and empirically true. It is wholly inadequate, as John Adams said, for any other people other than a moral and religious people." "The foundations, the very bedrock of this nation, is based entirely, entirely upon Christian principles, not some type of French enlightenment, not anything secular. It is based on Christ himself and the founders believe that." Benny Johnson Kayleigh McEnany Saturday in America

Eric Daugherty

114,924 views • 1 month ago

Candace Owens: “I would willfully sit on the side of the defense” “[The murderer is] not Tyler Robinson” Candace claimed in March she would reveal the names of the people who told her the gun was planted. “You’re trying to get a patsy put into prison…You’re completely monstrous” “There is an overwhelming amount of evidence that the feds set this kid up as a patsy” “Everyone in the town, all the local sheriff departments, the swat team, they believe that the Feds came in and they started lying and they were sending people on wild goose chases” “I’m not getting this information from people who don’t have the credibility to assert that” “I’m speaking to people with first hand intimate knowledge” “I feel the exact opposite of Charlie Kirk’s wife” She claims Erika Kirk isn’t certain about who killed Charlie but she’s “confident about is that there is a bunch of people who will lie for her”. She then demanded someone debate her but we’ve yet to see her follow through on any of the debates she’s demanded.
2:41

Candace Owens: “I would willfully sit on the side of the defense” “[The murderer is] not Tyler Robinson” Candace claimed in March she would reveal the names of the people who told her the gun was planted. “You’re trying to get a patsy put into prison…You’re completely monstrous” “There is an overwhelming amount of evidence that the feds set this kid up as a patsy” “Everyone in the town, all the local sheriff departments, the swat team, they believe that the Feds came in and they started lying and they were sending people on wild goose chases” “I’m not getting this information from people who don’t have the credibility to assert that” “I’m speaking to people with first hand intimate knowledge” “I feel the exact opposite of Charlie Kirk’s wife” She claims Erika Kirk isn’t certain about who killed Charlie but she’s “confident about is that there is a bunch of people who will lie for her”. She then demanded someone debate her but we’ve yet to see her follow through on any of the debates she’s demanded.

🦅 AlaskaBird (anti-commie)🇺🇸

86,056 views • 9 days ago

Watch Candace Owens lies to her audience and rewrites history... In December, during her sit-down with Erika Kirk, Candace said they didn’t have access to additional evidence - and that authorities “could very well” have more evidence they simply couldn’t share with the victim’s friends and family. Today, she told her audience: “When I sat down with Erika, I explained to you that her lawyer told me that right now we don’t have any evidence. Right now (Dec 2025), the state is going to go out there and find the evidence.” Not only does she gaslight her audience about what she previously said, she also expects them to believe Tyler Robinson was arrested and charged with no evidence - which is completely implausible and idiotic.
0:52

Watch Candace Owens lies to her audience and rewrites history... In December, during her sit-down with Erika Kirk, Candace said they didn’t have access to additional evidence - and that authorities “could very well” have more evidence they simply couldn’t share with the victim’s friends and family. Today, she told her audience: “When I sat down with Erika, I explained to you that her lawyer told me that right now we don’t have any evidence. Right now (Dec 2025), the state is going to go out there and find the evidence.” Not only does she gaslight her audience about what she previously said, she also expects them to believe Tyler Robinson was arrested and charged with no evidence - which is completely implausible and idiotic.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

44,446 views • 3 months ago

Who Won? Elon Musk Debates Don Lemon Over the Impact of DEI Programs Lemon repeatedly said, “There’s no evidence” that DEI programs are lowering medical standards, a comment Elon Musk believes is a “false statement.” Who is right? Musk calls on Community Notes to settle the score. LEMON: “There was a repost of Ben Shapiro that you claim that DEI is killing people. Specifically, you point to medicine. You claim that DEI programs are putting people at risk. Do you really believe this to be true? And what evidence do you have to support it?” MUSK: “What I was referring to there was that if we lower the standards for doctors, if the test for a doctor is lowered, then the probability of them making a mistake and killing someone is obviously going to be higher.” LEMON: “Wait, say that again. I’m not sure I understand what you said. I want to make sure I understand what you’re saying.” MUSK: “Yes. If the status for passing medical exams and becoming a doctor, especially something like a surgeon, if the standards are lowered, then the probability that the surgeon will make a mistake is higher. They’re making mistakes in their exam. They may make mistakes with people — and that may result in people dying.” LEMON: “What evidence do you have, though, that they’re lowering the standards? There is no evidence of that.” MUSK: “I believe there is.” LEMON: “There’s no evidence of that, Elon. What is the evidence?” MUSK: “I believe they have literally lowered the standards at Duke University, and that is what the article was referring to. You are saying they have not lowered the standards?” LEMON: “There’s no evidence about lowering standards. And I think that there is —” MUSK: “I believe that is a false statement you’re making.” LEMON: “Okay, well, we’ll figure it out.” MUSK: “The interesting thing is, when this is posted on the X platform, there will be a whole bunch of things that rebut what you said and what I said. And so people can then make their own decision, based on the replies and the rebuttals and the community notes.”
2:05

Who Won? Elon Musk Debates Don Lemon Over the Impact of DEI Programs Lemon repeatedly said, “There’s no evidence” that DEI programs are lowering medical standards, a comment Elon Musk believes is a “false statement.” Who is right? Musk calls on Community Notes to settle the score. LEMON: “There was a repost of Ben Shapiro that you claim that DEI is killing people. Specifically, you point to medicine. You claim that DEI programs are putting people at risk. Do you really believe this to be true? And what evidence do you have to support it?” MUSK: “What I was referring to there was that if we lower the standards for doctors, if the test for a doctor is lowered, then the probability of them making a mistake and killing someone is obviously going to be higher.” LEMON: “Wait, say that again. I’m not sure I understand what you said. I want to make sure I understand what you’re saying.” MUSK: “Yes. If the status for passing medical exams and becoming a doctor, especially something like a surgeon, if the standards are lowered, then the probability that the surgeon will make a mistake is higher. They’re making mistakes in their exam. They may make mistakes with people — and that may result in people dying.” LEMON: “What evidence do you have, though, that they’re lowering the standards? There is no evidence of that.” MUSK: “I believe there is.” LEMON: “There’s no evidence of that, Elon. What is the evidence?” MUSK: “I believe they have literally lowered the standards at Duke University, and that is what the article was referring to. You are saying they have not lowered the standards?” LEMON: “There’s no evidence about lowering standards. And I think that there is —” MUSK: “I believe that is a false statement you’re making.” LEMON: “Okay, well, we’ll figure it out.” MUSK: “The interesting thing is, when this is posted on the X platform, there will be a whole bunch of things that rebut what you said and what I said. And so people can then make their own decision, based on the replies and the rebuttals and the community notes.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

5,538,066 views • 2 years ago