Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Bent Over The Bathroom Counter Taking Deep Strokes ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ #bentover #standing #counter #backshots #bbc #ebony #pawg #moaning #freak #passionate

ComeCatchHer's profile picture

ComeCatchHer

27,581 subscribers

27,318 views โ€ข 4 months ago โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

NSFW#bentover#standing#counter#backshots#bbc#ebony#pawg#moaning#freak#passionate
LIVE

Anya Rossiโ€ข Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Controversy over the handling of a march and counter protest in Scarva. Dozens of police officers, some in riot gear, and water cannon were deployed as part of the policing operation in the Co Down village where several hundred people joined a protest against a Palestine solidarity walk on Saturday. The DUP branded the police operation โ€˜heavy handedโ€™ and said many of those on the ground felt it did nothing to reduce tension. Others have criticised the DUP MP Carla Lockhart after she was pictured standing near masked men. We hear from DUP MLA Jonathan Buckley who was also on the ground in Scarva, from Alliance Party MP Sorcha Eastwood, local resident Wesley who took part in the protest and Catherine โ€“ one of the organisers from the Ireland Palestine Solidarity Campaign. Listen to the full discussion on BBC Sounds.
2:49

Controversy over the handling of a march and counter protest in Scarva. Dozens of police officers, some in riot gear, and water cannon were deployed as part of the policing operation in the Co Down village where several hundred people joined a protest against a Palestine solidarity walk on Saturday. The DUP branded the police operation โ€˜heavy handedโ€™ and said many of those on the ground felt it did nothing to reduce tension. Others have criticised the DUP MP Carla Lockhart after she was pictured standing near masked men. We hear from DUP MLA Jonathan Buckley who was also on the ground in Scarva, from Alliance Party MP Sorcha Eastwood, local resident Wesley who took part in the protest and Catherine โ€“ one of the organisers from the Ireland Palestine Solidarity Campaign. Listen to the full discussion on BBC Sounds.

Stephen Nolan

13,749 views โ€ข 2 months ago

#Dhurandhar ; The title given to Ranveer Singhโ€™s character in Dhurandhar is Operation Wrath of God. Film Director Aditya Dhar has a habit of planting clues in plain sight and this feels like one of those details that deserves a much deeper discussion. In Dhurandhar Part I, it is shown that after the 2001 Parliament attack, India began rethinking its entire approach to counter terrorism. NSA Ajit Doval proposes a new model to Jaswant Singh, something long term and patient and unlike anything India had attempted before in the realm of countering terrorism. There is visible hesitation within the system because Project Dhurandhar is not an instant result plan. It is a prolonged operation that relies on deep planting and waiting. Now look at the arc of Jaskirat Singh Rangi. He is recruited in 2002 and deployed into Pakistan in 2004. That leaves a two year window where he was most likely being conditioned, trained and rebuilt. Whatโ€™s interesting is that this exact period coincides with India deepening its counter terrorism cooperation with Israel. This was the phase when India was actively studying Israeli counter terrorism methods, plausible deniability operations, long term infiltration and how sustained counter terror missions are actually built. The IDF and Mossad had more experience than almost anyone when it came to counter terrorism, especially in planting assets early and letting them run for years before results showed. Between 2002 and 2004, India and Israel held multiple high level engagements and discussions around counter terrorism and special forces cooperation with joint sessions of special forces reportedly taking place in both countries. In the world of Dhurandhar, this is precisely the period when Jaskirat Singh Rangi is being prepared and most likely trained alongside Israeli defence forces during these joint engagements, for something far bigger and far longer than a conventional operation. And this is where the title Wrath of God starts to make sense. One of the most famous operations in Israeli intelligence history was Operation Wrath of God, launched after the Munich Massacre. It was a decade long mission that was patient, methodical and ruthless. Every individual involved was identified, tracked and eliminated one by one over many years. In Dhurandhar, after Jaskirat Singh Rangi is planted, the film again and again stresses โ€œNazar aur Sabrโ€. He is told it will take time. Hence, Part -I felt like the seeding phase, the quiet build up. We only see glimpses of his ruthless side toward the end. And if Part-II goes where it seems to be heading, this becomes Indiaโ€™s own version of a Wrath of God style operation, where every individual involved in terror attacks against India including 26/11 who were present in that room and beyond, are on Jaskirat Singh Rangiโ€™s list. And, once the trigger point is reached, every name on that list is dealt with, one by one. Thatโ€™s why the title feels so apt. All these details, clues and layered choices are what make the world of Dhurandhar more and more interesting. Two scene in video 1 Uri: The Surgical Strike 2. Dhurandhar that mentions Operation Wrath of God.
0:33

#Dhurandhar ; The title given to Ranveer Singhโ€™s character in Dhurandhar is Operation Wrath of God. Film Director Aditya Dhar has a habit of planting clues in plain sight and this feels like one of those details that deserves a much deeper discussion. In Dhurandhar Part I, it is shown that after the 2001 Parliament attack, India began rethinking its entire approach to counter terrorism. NSA Ajit Doval proposes a new model to Jaswant Singh, something long term and patient and unlike anything India had attempted before in the realm of countering terrorism. There is visible hesitation within the system because Project Dhurandhar is not an instant result plan. It is a prolonged operation that relies on deep planting and waiting. Now look at the arc of Jaskirat Singh Rangi. He is recruited in 2002 and deployed into Pakistan in 2004. That leaves a two year window where he was most likely being conditioned, trained and rebuilt. Whatโ€™s interesting is that this exact period coincides with India deepening its counter terrorism cooperation with Israel. This was the phase when India was actively studying Israeli counter terrorism methods, plausible deniability operations, long term infiltration and how sustained counter terror missions are actually built. The IDF and Mossad had more experience than almost anyone when it came to counter terrorism, especially in planting assets early and letting them run for years before results showed. Between 2002 and 2004, India and Israel held multiple high level engagements and discussions around counter terrorism and special forces cooperation with joint sessions of special forces reportedly taking place in both countries. In the world of Dhurandhar, this is precisely the period when Jaskirat Singh Rangi is being prepared and most likely trained alongside Israeli defence forces during these joint engagements, for something far bigger and far longer than a conventional operation. And this is where the title Wrath of God starts to make sense. One of the most famous operations in Israeli intelligence history was Operation Wrath of God, launched after the Munich Massacre. It was a decade long mission that was patient, methodical and ruthless. Every individual involved was identified, tracked and eliminated one by one over many years. In Dhurandhar, after Jaskirat Singh Rangi is planted, the film again and again stresses โ€œNazar aur Sabrโ€. He is told it will take time. Hence, Part -I felt like the seeding phase, the quiet build up. We only see glimpses of his ruthless side toward the end. And if Part-II goes where it seems to be heading, this becomes Indiaโ€™s own version of a Wrath of God style operation, where every individual involved in terror attacks against India including 26/11 who were present in that room and beyond, are on Jaskirat Singh Rangiโ€™s list. And, once the trigger point is reached, every name on that list is dealt with, one by one. Thatโ€™s why the title feels so apt. All these details, clues and layered choices are what make the world of Dhurandhar more and more interesting. Two scene in video 1 Uri: The Surgical Strike 2. Dhurandhar that mentions Operation Wrath of God.

Kanwaljit Arora

411,546 views โ€ข 7 months ago

๐Ÿšจ 16-year-old Gracie was alone behind the counter at Pan Pizza Co. in Lancaster, NY when FIVE teens (3 girls + 2 boys) rolled up to jump her over old school beef โ€” phones out, filming for clout. Big mistake. Gracie? Trained MMA fighter. She grabbed the main aggressor by the hair, slammed her to the floor like a ragdoll, dropped knees, threw clean technique, and sent the whole crew scrambling out the door in pure panic. One attacker left with a broken orbital bone. Police reviewed the store CCTV + their own leaked footage: 100% clear self-defense. No charges for Gracie. The three lead girls? Now facing felony gang assault charges. Moral of the story: Don't start nothing, won't be nothing. Train. Stay ready. Protect yourself. FAFO in real time. Who else is proud of this queen standing on business? ๐Ÿ‘‘๐ŸฅŠ๐Ÿ• Tag a friend who needs to see this empowerment masterclass ๐Ÿ”ฅ #Gracie #SelfDefense #FAFO #MMAGirl #PizzaShopHero #NeverBackDown #ViralJustice #KnowYourWorth
0:32

๐Ÿšจ 16-year-old Gracie was alone behind the counter at Pan Pizza Co. in Lancaster, NY when FIVE teens (3 girls + 2 boys) rolled up to jump her over old school beef โ€” phones out, filming for clout. Big mistake. Gracie? Trained MMA fighter. She grabbed the main aggressor by the hair, slammed her to the floor like a ragdoll, dropped knees, threw clean technique, and sent the whole crew scrambling out the door in pure panic. One attacker left with a broken orbital bone. Police reviewed the store CCTV + their own leaked footage: 100% clear self-defense. No charges for Gracie. The three lead girls? Now facing felony gang assault charges. Moral of the story: Don't start nothing, won't be nothing. Train. Stay ready. Protect yourself. FAFO in real time. Who else is proud of this queen standing on business? ๐Ÿ‘‘๐ŸฅŠ๐Ÿ• Tag a friend who needs to see this empowerment masterclass ๐Ÿ”ฅ #Gracie #SelfDefense #FAFO #MMAGirl #PizzaShopHero #NeverBackDown #ViralJustice #KnowYourWorth

Billy Lee

186,634 views โ€ข 6 months ago

So, I can finally share the full details from the recording of when I was visited by the Prevent Counter-Terrorism police. This clip shows just one of many accusations made against me by members of the Muslim community, accusations that led to my arrest. Listen carefully to how these two officers repeatedly tell me that Iโ€™m โ€œnot in any trouble,โ€ yet in the same breath insist that Iโ€™m somehow being radicalised by the far right simply for attending a Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง rally. Over and over, they reassured me I wasnโ€™t in trouble but also warned me that attending a peaceful protest could โ€œcross a line.โ€ Since when did attending a rally, expressing a view, or standing for what you believe in become a criminal act in Britain? Let me make something absolutely clear. no one asked me to fight this fight. I chose to stand up because I have White British friends, family, and deep loyalty to this great country. Thatโ€™s why Iโ€™m standing shoulder to shoulder with the White British people. This is about principle, loyalty, and love for Britain. To everyone who has shown me support, thank you. Your messages and encouragement mean the world to me. โค๏ธ Iโ€™ll be releasing more clips from the full hour long recording soon please bear with me as I edit and prepare the next parts. Thank you, and stay tuned. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง
8:24

So, I can finally share the full details from the recording of when I was visited by the Prevent Counter-Terrorism police. This clip shows just one of many accusations made against me by members of the Muslim community, accusations that led to my arrest. Listen carefully to how these two officers repeatedly tell me that Iโ€™m โ€œnot in any trouble,โ€ yet in the same breath insist that Iโ€™m somehow being radicalised by the far right simply for attending a Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง rally. Over and over, they reassured me I wasnโ€™t in trouble but also warned me that attending a peaceful protest could โ€œcross a line.โ€ Since when did attending a rally, expressing a view, or standing for what you believe in become a criminal act in Britain? Let me make something absolutely clear. no one asked me to fight this fight. I chose to stand up because I have White British friends, family, and deep loyalty to this great country. Thatโ€™s why Iโ€™m standing shoulder to shoulder with the White British people. This is about principle, loyalty, and love for Britain. To everyone who has shown me support, thank you. Your messages and encouragement mean the world to me. โค๏ธ Iโ€™ll be releasing more clips from the full hour long recording soon please bear with me as I edit and prepare the next parts. Thank you, and stay tuned. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Sir Shoaib

206,571 views โ€ข 9 months ago

The CS2 update we have been waiting for is finally here. Valve has created a Beta branch for animgraph2 for third person animations. This is NOT an April fools joke. While everyone was watching the launch of Artemis II, Valve suddenly released what they've been working on for the past couple of years. What this means is that the entire animation system for third person models has been completely redone. No longer does it use the unoptimized Half-Life: Alyx system. This significantly reduces packet size. You can now tell when someone is counter-strafing, and properly predict their movements based on visual feedback. Another massive change here is that the player's view now is accurate to the player model, meaning that we have a variable player height of +-4 units. You'll immediately notice that the player seems shorter. This completely changes many many angles, as well as many utility lineups, particularly when standing on slopes. Notice in my video example how you can no longer see over the Dust2 A site boxes from A ramp. The change is currently in Beta, so it's all subject to change. I will be testing it out extensively and making a video about my thoughts. First impressions: I am VERY excited about this, more so than the Artemis II rocket taking humans back to the moon for the first time in forever.
0:20

The CS2 update we have been waiting for is finally here. Valve has created a Beta branch for animgraph2 for third person animations. This is NOT an April fools joke. While everyone was watching the launch of Artemis II, Valve suddenly released what they've been working on for the past couple of years. What this means is that the entire animation system for third person models has been completely redone. No longer does it use the unoptimized Half-Life: Alyx system. This significantly reduces packet size. You can now tell when someone is counter-strafing, and properly predict their movements based on visual feedback. Another massive change here is that the player's view now is accurate to the player model, meaning that we have a variable player height of +-4 units. You'll immediately notice that the player seems shorter. This completely changes many many angles, as well as many utility lineups, particularly when standing on slopes. Notice in my video example how you can no longer see over the Dust2 A site boxes from A ramp. The change is currently in Beta, so it's all subject to change. I will be testing it out extensively and making a video about my thoughts. First impressions: I am VERY excited about this, more so than the Artemis II rocket taking humans back to the moon for the first time in forever.

WarOwl

451,056 views โ€ข 4 months ago

TRUMP FREES AMERICA BY TAKING THE BRITISH EMPIRE DOWN MJTruthUltra A must listenโ€ฆ ๐Ÿšจ Britainโ€™s Last Play: Hidden Imperial Hand Exposed Behind Trumpโ€™s Third Assassination Attempt as King Charles Arrives in DC The third assassination attempt on President Trump Trump occured at the Washington Hiltonโ€”the exact site of the 1981 Reagan shooting. Susan Kokinda connects this event directly to King Charlesโ€™ arrival in Washington, DC, the same week, framing it as part of a coordinated British effort to influence or pressure the Trump administration. A Reuters headline is shown: โ€œKing Charles on US mission to bolster UKโ€™s special relationship with โ€˜royalistโ€™ Trump.โ€ The report highlights a recent House of Lords / Chatham House report admitting that the British Empire is โ€œTOASTโ€ without full U.S. cooperation and the โ€œrules-based order.โ€ It argues these are not isolated stories but symptoms of the British imperial systemโ€™s desperation. Historical parallel is drawn to President William McKinley, a protectionist leader of the American System who was assassinated in 1901โ€”exactly the kind of economic nationalist policies (tariffs, American industry revival) that the British Empire FEARED then and fears again in Trumpโ€™s agenda today. Kokinda references Trumpโ€™s own comments on impactful assassinations and ties in the new book The Queen and Her Presidents as further evidence of long-standing British influence operations. She says these events reflect the British deep state / imperial systemโ€™s hidden hand in a last-ditch effort to counter Trumpโ€™s โ€œAmerican Systemโ€ revival (tariffs, manufacturing, economic sovereignty). The British Empire views Trumpโ€™s policies as an existential threat, just as it did McKinleyโ€™s, and is using every toolโ€”EVEN ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS. ๐Ÿ“ฑ ReTWEET: PrometheanAction:
14:57

TRUMP FREES AMERICA BY TAKING THE BRITISH EMPIRE DOWN MJTruthUltra A must listenโ€ฆ ๐Ÿšจ Britainโ€™s Last Play: Hidden Imperial Hand Exposed Behind Trumpโ€™s Third Assassination Attempt as King Charles Arrives in DC The third assassination attempt on President Trump Trump occured at the Washington Hiltonโ€”the exact site of the 1981 Reagan shooting. Susan Kokinda connects this event directly to King Charlesโ€™ arrival in Washington, DC, the same week, framing it as part of a coordinated British effort to influence or pressure the Trump administration. A Reuters headline is shown: โ€œKing Charles on US mission to bolster UKโ€™s special relationship with โ€˜royalistโ€™ Trump.โ€ The report highlights a recent House of Lords / Chatham House report admitting that the British Empire is โ€œTOASTโ€ without full U.S. cooperation and the โ€œrules-based order.โ€ It argues these are not isolated stories but symptoms of the British imperial systemโ€™s desperation. Historical parallel is drawn to President William McKinley, a protectionist leader of the American System who was assassinated in 1901โ€”exactly the kind of economic nationalist policies (tariffs, American industry revival) that the British Empire FEARED then and fears again in Trumpโ€™s agenda today. Kokinda references Trumpโ€™s own comments on impactful assassinations and ties in the new book The Queen and Her Presidents as further evidence of long-standing British influence operations. She says these events reflect the British deep state / imperial systemโ€™s hidden hand in a last-ditch effort to counter Trumpโ€™s โ€œAmerican Systemโ€ revival (tariffs, manufacturing, economic sovereignty). The British Empire views Trumpโ€™s policies as an existential threat, just as it did McKinleyโ€™s, and is using every toolโ€”EVEN ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS. ๐Ÿ“ฑ ReTWEET: PrometheanAction:

Iam Breitbart

33,176 views โ€ข 3 months ago

US allies have long lent on its military for protection. Trump is hell-bent on shattering that dependency โ€” and abandoning US hegemony. Professor Hugh White has predicted this retreat for 30 years and despite calling the US-led order a 'golden age', he thinks it's a good thing. In his new book, 'Hard New World: Out Post-American Future', he notes that the only way the US could counter the Chinese navy in its own backyard is to spend 7%+ of GDP on its military, and convince China it's truly willing to risk a nuclear war. It's impossible for any US President, Trump or otherwise, to justify that to voters. The west Pacific just isn't important enough to US interests. And so it hasn't happened. Over in Europe the US doesn't have enough of a selfish interest to risk nuclear war with Russia over Eastern Europe, making Russian 'nuclear blackmail' against its neighbours highly effective. White believes the only effective way to push back is for Europe to get nuclear weapons of its own โ€” something Japan and South Korea will have to do as well. Trump may not be a deep theorist but according to White โ€” Professor Emeritus of Strategic Studies and one of the world's leading strategic thinkers โ€” in geopolitics his instincts inadvertently 'swim with the tide of history'. And for his part Marco Rubio is quite explicit about bringing an end to the unipolar US-led order. So our interview spells out what Poland, the EU, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Australia will each have to do now to ensure their own security. Because although it will be a 'darker' world, we've made multipolarity work before โ€” indeed a bit of history shows it's the rule rather than the exception. We discuss all this on the 80,000 Hours Podcast. Links below, enjoy! 1:25 US dominance is already gone 3:26 US hegemony was the weird aberration 13:08 Why the US bothered being the 'new Rome' 23:25 Evidence the US is accepting the multipolar global order 36:41 How Trump is advancing the inevitable 43:21 Rubio explicitly favours this outcome 45:42 Trump is half-right that the US was being ripped off 50:14 It doesn't matter if the next president feels differently 56:17 China's population is shrinking, but it doesn't matter 1:06:07 Why Hugh disagrees with other realists like Mearsheimer 1:10:52 Could the US be persuaded to spend 2x on defence? 1:16:22 A multipolar world is bad, but better than nuclear war 1:21:46 Will the US invade Panama? Greenland? Canada?! 1:32:01 What should everyone else do to protect themselves in this new world? 1:39:41 Europe is strong enough to take on Russia 1:44:03 But the EU will need nuclear weapons 1:48:34 Cancel (some) orders for US fighter planes 1:53:40 Taiwan is screwed, even with its AI chips 2:04:12 South Korea has to go nuclear too 2:08:08 Japan will go nuclear, but can't be a regional leader 2:11:44 Australia is defensible but needs a totally different military 2:17:19 AGI may or may not overcome existing nuclear deterrence 2:34:24 How right is realism? 2:40:17 Has a country ever gone to war over morality alone? 2:44:45 Hugh's message for Americans 2:47:12 Why America temporarily stopped being isolationist
2:53:35

US allies have long lent on its military for protection. Trump is hell-bent on shattering that dependency โ€” and abandoning US hegemony. Professor Hugh White has predicted this retreat for 30 years and despite calling the US-led order a 'golden age', he thinks it's a good thing. In his new book, 'Hard New World: Out Post-American Future', he notes that the only way the US could counter the Chinese navy in its own backyard is to spend 7%+ of GDP on its military, and convince China it's truly willing to risk a nuclear war. It's impossible for any US President, Trump or otherwise, to justify that to voters. The west Pacific just isn't important enough to US interests. And so it hasn't happened. Over in Europe the US doesn't have enough of a selfish interest to risk nuclear war with Russia over Eastern Europe, making Russian 'nuclear blackmail' against its neighbours highly effective. White believes the only effective way to push back is for Europe to get nuclear weapons of its own โ€” something Japan and South Korea will have to do as well. Trump may not be a deep theorist but according to White โ€” Professor Emeritus of Strategic Studies and one of the world's leading strategic thinkers โ€” in geopolitics his instincts inadvertently 'swim with the tide of history'. And for his part Marco Rubio is quite explicit about bringing an end to the unipolar US-led order. So our interview spells out what Poland, the EU, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Australia will each have to do now to ensure their own security. Because although it will be a 'darker' world, we've made multipolarity work before โ€” indeed a bit of history shows it's the rule rather than the exception. We discuss all this on the 80,000 Hours Podcast. Links below, enjoy! 1:25 US dominance is already gone 3:26 US hegemony was the weird aberration 13:08 Why the US bothered being the 'new Rome' 23:25 Evidence the US is accepting the multipolar global order 36:41 How Trump is advancing the inevitable 43:21 Rubio explicitly favours this outcome 45:42 Trump is half-right that the US was being ripped off 50:14 It doesn't matter if the next president feels differently 56:17 China's population is shrinking, but it doesn't matter 1:06:07 Why Hugh disagrees with other realists like Mearsheimer 1:10:52 Could the US be persuaded to spend 2x on defence? 1:16:22 A multipolar world is bad, but better than nuclear war 1:21:46 Will the US invade Panama? Greenland? Canada?! 1:32:01 What should everyone else do to protect themselves in this new world? 1:39:41 Europe is strong enough to take on Russia 1:44:03 But the EU will need nuclear weapons 1:48:34 Cancel (some) orders for US fighter planes 1:53:40 Taiwan is screwed, even with its AI chips 2:04:12 South Korea has to go nuclear too 2:08:08 Japan will go nuclear, but can't be a regional leader 2:11:44 Australia is defensible but needs a totally different military 2:17:19 AGI may or may not overcome existing nuclear deterrence 2:34:24 How right is realism? 2:40:17 Has a country ever gone to war over morality alone? 2:44:45 Hugh's message for Americans 2:47:12 Why America temporarily stopped being isolationist

Rob Wiblin

17,513 views โ€ข 1 year ago

I am beginning to fall in love with Trump. And I can only hope that the Opposition in Nigeria are ready. DT will embark on Operation โ€œDrain the Swampโ€ from Day 1. He will go after drug lords & drug cartels (on domestic & foreign soil). Drug lords will receive the death penalty. As an outlier, DT is perfectly suited for this mission. JD Vance is talking tough as well, & I like his body language. Withdrawing U.S Forces from Africa will finally give Africans the opportunity to fight back, & reclaim their individual nation states from the Obama-Biden chokehold. DT will go after the intelligence community (CIA, FBI, etc). The State Department wont be left out. And this is were Nigerians & Africans should pay attention. DOS is in charge of Americaโ€™s Foreign Policy around the world. Remember David Axelrod (Obamaโ€™s Chief Strategist)? In cahoots with John Kerry, both men were used by Barrack Obama to mount pressure on Goodluck Ebele Jonathan in 2015. Nigerians are familiar with the story. They used the State Department to achieve that mission. DOS are the people that actively aided & congratulated Asiwaju (following the February 2023 flawed INEC declaration). Trump cleaning out that department will give Nigerians the opportunity to breathe & re-strategize. He will go after Deep State bureaucrats involved in censorship & state Capture. They are the representative of โ€œThe Establishmentโ€ in Nigeria. The Establishment are the 1% Nigerians. They control political levers & the economy, & dominate public life. They are the people that partnered with Bola Tinubu to capture the state. Now every institution (INEC, the judiciary, the police, etc) are carefully maintained, to do their biddings. Trump is Democracy for America, & reprieve for Africans (from their oppressive regimes). No more censorships. Now David Hundeyin can push for Bola Tinubu's redacted FBI files to be published. David has 50/50 chance now. Nigerians should ready themselves for 2027. You have a date with History. Trumpโ€™s pledge to back off, is the oxygen you need! Finally, Nigerians will begin to feel like they can win. The APC are not relenting, so should the Opposition. The APC retained high budget Washington Lobbyists in the past 9 years. That is going to change, but the Opposition should begin their lobbying in earnest as well. Voting is the easy part. Getting the rogue INEC to declare the rightful winner, is the hard part. I expect Peter Obi to leverage his connect (Paul Ryan). Pastor fitness trainer has one of Trump's kids as his connect as well. The APC will try to leverage that. By & large, 2027 has begun, intense lobbying is already in full swing. I see Elon Muskโ€™s handwriting all over Trump's speech. Perhaps Elon Musk will finally lift the shadow-ban on my Twitter account. Elon should show me some magnanimity. ๐Ÿ˜ฐ The selection of MC Oluomo as the chairman of the NURTW is for election material logistics. MC will be in-charge of distributing INEC materials. The Opposition should have a counter-strategy. It's a game of chess. โ€œRook to kings rook 3, check!" Let the best strategists win! With Obama-Biden Foreign Intelligence out of the picture, Nigerians will have a breather. Perhaps my victory will come from this. I can manage a โ€œracistโ€ who will overcompensate with a Crusade against Rogue foreign intelligence. In fights for freedom, the enemy of your enemy becomes your friend. There are unseen battles going on behind the scene. You have moving parts on the chess board. People are taking up vantage positions, & looking out for themselves & their bases. I can only hope that the Opposition in Nigeria are not snoring. Call on favors, use whatever levers you have at your disposable. You need eyes inside the Trumpโ€™s Administration. With the Democrats out of the picture, you guyโ€™s chances just received a boost. Dear โ€œSensible Nigerians,โ€ we have this one LAST CHANCE to push for FREEDOM. In Scar (Simbaโ€™s wicked uncleโ€™s) voice; BE PREPARED!
0:29

Sensitive content

I am beginning to fall in love with Trump. And I can only hope that the Opposition in Nigeria are ready. DT will embark on Operation โ€œDrain the Swampโ€ from Day 1. He will go after drug lords & drug cartels (on domestic & foreign soil). Drug lords will receive the death penalty. As an outlier, DT is perfectly suited for this mission. JD Vance is talking tough as well, & I like his body language. Withdrawing U.S Forces from Africa will finally give Africans the opportunity to fight back, & reclaim their individual nation states from the Obama-Biden chokehold. DT will go after the intelligence community (CIA, FBI, etc). The State Department wont be left out. And this is were Nigerians & Africans should pay attention. DOS is in charge of Americaโ€™s Foreign Policy around the world. Remember David Axelrod (Obamaโ€™s Chief Strategist)? In cahoots with John Kerry, both men were used by Barrack Obama to mount pressure on Goodluck Ebele Jonathan in 2015. Nigerians are familiar with the story. They used the State Department to achieve that mission. DOS are the people that actively aided & congratulated Asiwaju (following the February 2023 flawed INEC declaration). Trump cleaning out that department will give Nigerians the opportunity to breathe & re-strategize. He will go after Deep State bureaucrats involved in censorship & state Capture. They are the representative of โ€œThe Establishmentโ€ in Nigeria. The Establishment are the 1% Nigerians. They control political levers & the economy, & dominate public life. They are the people that partnered with Bola Tinubu to capture the state. Now every institution (INEC, the judiciary, the police, etc) are carefully maintained, to do their biddings. Trump is Democracy for America, & reprieve for Africans (from their oppressive regimes). No more censorships. Now David Hundeyin can push for Bola Tinubu's redacted FBI files to be published. David has 50/50 chance now. Nigerians should ready themselves for 2027. You have a date with History. Trumpโ€™s pledge to back off, is the oxygen you need! Finally, Nigerians will begin to feel like they can win. The APC are not relenting, so should the Opposition. The APC retained high budget Washington Lobbyists in the past 9 years. That is going to change, but the Opposition should begin their lobbying in earnest as well. Voting is the easy part. Getting the rogue INEC to declare the rightful winner, is the hard part. I expect Peter Obi to leverage his connect (Paul Ryan). Pastor fitness trainer has one of Trump's kids as his connect as well. The APC will try to leverage that. By & large, 2027 has begun, intense lobbying is already in full swing. I see Elon Muskโ€™s handwriting all over Trump's speech. Perhaps Elon Musk will finally lift the shadow-ban on my Twitter account. Elon should show me some magnanimity. ๐Ÿ˜ฐ The selection of MC Oluomo as the chairman of the NURTW is for election material logistics. MC will be in-charge of distributing INEC materials. The Opposition should have a counter-strategy. It's a game of chess. โ€œRook to kings rook 3, check!" Let the best strategists win! With Obama-Biden Foreign Intelligence out of the picture, Nigerians will have a breather. Perhaps my victory will come from this. I can manage a โ€œracistโ€ who will overcompensate with a Crusade against Rogue foreign intelligence. In fights for freedom, the enemy of your enemy becomes your friend. There are unseen battles going on behind the scene. You have moving parts on the chess board. People are taking up vantage positions, & looking out for themselves & their bases. I can only hope that the Opposition in Nigeria are not snoring. Call on favors, use whatever levers you have at your disposable. You need eyes inside the Trumpโ€™s Administration. With the Democrats out of the picture, you guyโ€™s chances just received a boost. Dear โ€œSensible Nigerians,โ€ we have this one LAST CHANCE to push for FREEDOM. In Scar (Simbaโ€™s wicked uncleโ€™s) voice; BE PREPARED!

NEFERTITI

151,102 views โ€ข 1 year ago

๐Ÿšจ BREAKING: UNITED AGAINST THE GLOBALIST ASSAULT ๐Ÿšจ ๐Ÿ”Ž COURTROOMS. BORDERS. BACKROOMS. HISTORY IS BEING MADE. ๐Ÿ—ฃ โ€œThey blindfolded the lawyer. Locked him in max security. No charges. Just silence.โ€ ๐Ÿ”ฅ The fight for freedom is now global โ€” and the world is watching. ๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐Ÿ“ข WHAT THIS MEANS: โš  A historic court case in the Netherlands has named Gates, Bourla, Schwab & others. โš  Charges: Genocide. Psychological warfare. Crimes against humanity. โš  Media blackout. No cameras. No outrage. Just silence. WHY? Over the past few weeks, Iโ€™ve been everywhere โ€” from the Leeuwarden courthouse in the Netherlands to historic political meetings in Ireland. It was 4 weeks ago when lead lawyer Arno van Kessel โ€” who brought this explosive case forward โ€” was arrested, blindfolded, and thrown into max security. No charges. No trial. Just gone. They thought that would stop the case. It didnโ€™t. The court papers were delivered. I sat in the courtroom. I watched the accusations unfold. ๐Ÿ’ฃ The names listed? Bill Gates. Albert Bourla. Klaus Schwab. Global media figures. Politicians. Accused of deploying biological weapons, engineering mass deception, and waging psychological war against the people. ๐Ÿงจ This is Nuremberg-level territory. And while most of the accused sent legal teams to observe and reactโ€ฆ Gates didnโ€™t even show up. No lawyers. No defence. Maybe he thinks this will just disappear. It wonโ€™t. โš– Judgement is coming within 6 weeks. And this could set a precedent for similar trials across the world. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Meanwhile, in Ireland โ€” I was honoured to be invited to chair a historic unity meeting with political leaders from across the island. Irish patriots coming together. Building a new nationalist partnership. Forging unity. Because unity is strength. They asked me to facilitate โ€” not because Iโ€™m Irish, but because Iโ€™m a neutral Highlander, with deep respect for Celtic heritage. Iโ€™ve committed to chair ongoing talks until a unified Irish nationalist coalition is formed. This wasnโ€™t just a meeting. It was a moment in history. A new wave is rising. ๐Ÿ›‘ Why? Because Ireland is being overrun. ๐Ÿ”ป Native population: ~3 million ๐Ÿ”บ Illegal influx: Up to 3 million more โ€” overwhelmingly young men No vetting. No background checks. No integration. Just communities drowning in chaos and fear. The media says โ€œasylum seekers.โ€ But these are military-age males, dumping passports, vanishing into small towns, and straining every service. Itโ€™s not just Ireland. France. Germany. Sweden. UK. Itโ€™s everywhere. A coordinated collapse of borders. A silent erasure of national identity. But in America? The border is finally being locked down. Why not Europe? ๐Ÿ’ฅ Because they donโ€™t want it sealed. They want us broken. Divided. Replaced. But we will not be. ๐ŸŒ Iโ€™ve spoken in Romania. ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Iโ€™ve stood in Budapest. ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท I met with Marine Le Pen in France. ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Iโ€™ve reported from inside Dutch courtrooms. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช And now I help unify Irish patriots. And Iโ€™ve joined Advance UK โ€” a rising political party in Britain led by Ben Habib โ€” to fight this crisis head-on in the UK. We must build coalitions across Europe. Not under Brussels, but among free, sovereign nations who love their culture, faith, and families. ๐Ÿ’ฌ As Ben said: โ€œWe face an existential threat to Western civilisation.โ€ And heโ€™s right. ๐Ÿ™ To the millions of you supporting this movement, thank you. Your shares, your messages, your donations โ€” they keep the engine burning. This fight is global, and your voice makes it louder. ๐ŸŒ Join the movement at: ๐Ÿ’ฅ This is the largest, fastest-growing freedom movement in the world. ๐ŸŽฏ We are over the target. ๐Ÿ“ข We are the counter-narrative. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Together, we will reclaim our nations. Together, we will restore the truth. UNITY IS STRENGTH. SOVEREIGNTY IS NON-NEGOTIABLE. THE TIME IS NOW. โ€” Jim Ferguson Freedom Train International Raymond Heney Malachy Steenson Derek Blighe Michael Leahy
20:04

๐Ÿšจ BREAKING: UNITED AGAINST THE GLOBALIST ASSAULT ๐Ÿšจ ๐Ÿ”Ž COURTROOMS. BORDERS. BACKROOMS. HISTORY IS BEING MADE. ๐Ÿ—ฃ โ€œThey blindfolded the lawyer. Locked him in max security. No charges. Just silence.โ€ ๐Ÿ”ฅ The fight for freedom is now global โ€” and the world is watching. ๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐Ÿ“ข WHAT THIS MEANS: โš  A historic court case in the Netherlands has named Gates, Bourla, Schwab & others. โš  Charges: Genocide. Psychological warfare. Crimes against humanity. โš  Media blackout. No cameras. No outrage. Just silence. WHY? Over the past few weeks, Iโ€™ve been everywhere โ€” from the Leeuwarden courthouse in the Netherlands to historic political meetings in Ireland. It was 4 weeks ago when lead lawyer Arno van Kessel โ€” who brought this explosive case forward โ€” was arrested, blindfolded, and thrown into max security. No charges. No trial. Just gone. They thought that would stop the case. It didnโ€™t. The court papers were delivered. I sat in the courtroom. I watched the accusations unfold. ๐Ÿ’ฃ The names listed? Bill Gates. Albert Bourla. Klaus Schwab. Global media figures. Politicians. Accused of deploying biological weapons, engineering mass deception, and waging psychological war against the people. ๐Ÿงจ This is Nuremberg-level territory. And while most of the accused sent legal teams to observe and reactโ€ฆ Gates didnโ€™t even show up. No lawyers. No defence. Maybe he thinks this will just disappear. It wonโ€™t. โš– Judgement is coming within 6 weeks. And this could set a precedent for similar trials across the world. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Meanwhile, in Ireland โ€” I was honoured to be invited to chair a historic unity meeting with political leaders from across the island. Irish patriots coming together. Building a new nationalist partnership. Forging unity. Because unity is strength. They asked me to facilitate โ€” not because Iโ€™m Irish, but because Iโ€™m a neutral Highlander, with deep respect for Celtic heritage. Iโ€™ve committed to chair ongoing talks until a unified Irish nationalist coalition is formed. This wasnโ€™t just a meeting. It was a moment in history. A new wave is rising. ๐Ÿ›‘ Why? Because Ireland is being overrun. ๐Ÿ”ป Native population: ~3 million ๐Ÿ”บ Illegal influx: Up to 3 million more โ€” overwhelmingly young men No vetting. No background checks. No integration. Just communities drowning in chaos and fear. The media says โ€œasylum seekers.โ€ But these are military-age males, dumping passports, vanishing into small towns, and straining every service. Itโ€™s not just Ireland. France. Germany. Sweden. UK. Itโ€™s everywhere. A coordinated collapse of borders. A silent erasure of national identity. But in America? The border is finally being locked down. Why not Europe? ๐Ÿ’ฅ Because they donโ€™t want it sealed. They want us broken. Divided. Replaced. But we will not be. ๐ŸŒ Iโ€™ve spoken in Romania. ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Iโ€™ve stood in Budapest. ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท I met with Marine Le Pen in France. ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Iโ€™ve reported from inside Dutch courtrooms. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช And now I help unify Irish patriots. And Iโ€™ve joined Advance UK โ€” a rising political party in Britain led by Ben Habib โ€” to fight this crisis head-on in the UK. We must build coalitions across Europe. Not under Brussels, but among free, sovereign nations who love their culture, faith, and families. ๐Ÿ’ฌ As Ben said: โ€œWe face an existential threat to Western civilisation.โ€ And heโ€™s right. ๐Ÿ™ To the millions of you supporting this movement, thank you. Your shares, your messages, your donations โ€” they keep the engine burning. This fight is global, and your voice makes it louder. ๐ŸŒ Join the movement at: ๐Ÿ’ฅ This is the largest, fastest-growing freedom movement in the world. ๐ŸŽฏ We are over the target. ๐Ÿ“ข We are the counter-narrative. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Together, we will reclaim our nations. Together, we will restore the truth. UNITY IS STRENGTH. SOVEREIGNTY IS NON-NEGOTIABLE. THE TIME IS NOW. โ€” Jim Ferguson Freedom Train International Raymond Heney Malachy Steenson Derek Blighe Michael Leahy

Jim Ferguson

92,387 views โ€ข 1 year ago

Monroe Doctrine 2.0: The Hemisphere as Strategic Depth Again If you strip away the slogans and look at the pattern of U.S. behavior in South America, itโ€™s clear this isnโ€™t a scattered drug operation or a dispute with one government. Itโ€™s a coordinated effort to reassert control over the Western Hemisphere at a moment when the global system is strained and outside powers including China, Russia, and even Iran are expanding their influence in the region. Washington has rewritten the threat map. Cartels are no longer framed as criminal gangs but as shadow sovereigns that run ports, smuggling corridors, fuel theft, illicit mining, and migration routes. Once theyโ€™re categorized as national security threats through terrorist designations and expanded authorities, the U.S. can deploy a much wider toolset. That shift explains the military footprint now surrounding Venezuela with carrier groups, aerial patrols, interdictions, missile strikes on cartel linked vessels, and expanded CIA authorities. Publicly itโ€™s counter narcotics, but the operational scale makes it clear this is strategic pressure. The clash with Venezuela fits that logic. The U.S. claims to be targeting narco terror networks, but the naval deployments, sanctions, covert activity, and strikes on ships signal a broader goal which is preventing China and Russia from turning Venezuela into a durable platform for energy, debt, and military influence. Maduroโ€™s defiant rhetoric, mass mobilization, and accusations of regime change plots show how seriously Caracas is taking the escalation. At the same time, the U.S. has floated ultimatums and backchannel offers, hinting that both coercion and negotiation are in play. How This Connects to a New Monroe Doctrine The original Monroe Doctrine warned European empires not to interfere in the Americas. Today the threat isnโ€™t colonial flags, itโ€™s external leverage systems like Chinese loans, ports, power grids, lithium concessions, Russian arms deals, Iranian intelligence networks, and the cartel economies that allow all three to operate beneath formal diplomacy. Influence now flows through supply chains, digital infrastructure, and commodity corridors. Monroe 2.0 is about sealing off those points of entry. That is why Venezuela, Guyana, and Colombia matter so much. Venezuela is the hinge because of its giant reserves and long standing ties to Beijing and Moscow. Guyana is the hedge: a booming offshore oil basin dominated by U.S. operators. Colombia is the platform: geographically positioned between the Pacific, the Caribbean, and the Panama Canal, making it essential for intelligence, logistics, and interdiction. Together they form the strategic triangle the U.S. is trying to secure before rivals establish deeper footholds. China plays the slow game with ports, energy grids, lithium, rare earths, state loans, long term supply contracts. Russia plays the sharper one with arms, training, intelligence cooperation, symbolic military access. Iran moves through asymmetric channels and non state actors. To Washington, this is exactly the type of outside interference the modern doctrine is supposed to block. What Happens Next Expect continuous naval and air presence in the Caribbean and Atlantic corridors. Expect more sanctions, bank designations, and interdictions aimed at cartel logistics and foreign facilitators. Expect pressure on governments flirting with Chinese port or telecom deals. Expect migration to be treated as a security variable directly linked to cartel control. And expect continued use of limited military force when Washington believes cartel networks are enabling rival influence. In simple terms, the U.S. is rebuilding a modern sphere of influence to prevent outside powers from turning the hemisphere into a pressure point during a global transition. This isnโ€™t about one leader or one crisis, itโ€™s about who shapes the next system and whether the Western Hemisphere stays under U.S. command when it arrives.
0:49

Monroe Doctrine 2.0: The Hemisphere as Strategic Depth Again If you strip away the slogans and look at the pattern of U.S. behavior in South America, itโ€™s clear this isnโ€™t a scattered drug operation or a dispute with one government. Itโ€™s a coordinated effort to reassert control over the Western Hemisphere at a moment when the global system is strained and outside powers including China, Russia, and even Iran are expanding their influence in the region. Washington has rewritten the threat map. Cartels are no longer framed as criminal gangs but as shadow sovereigns that run ports, smuggling corridors, fuel theft, illicit mining, and migration routes. Once theyโ€™re categorized as national security threats through terrorist designations and expanded authorities, the U.S. can deploy a much wider toolset. That shift explains the military footprint now surrounding Venezuela with carrier groups, aerial patrols, interdictions, missile strikes on cartel linked vessels, and expanded CIA authorities. Publicly itโ€™s counter narcotics, but the operational scale makes it clear this is strategic pressure. The clash with Venezuela fits that logic. The U.S. claims to be targeting narco terror networks, but the naval deployments, sanctions, covert activity, and strikes on ships signal a broader goal which is preventing China and Russia from turning Venezuela into a durable platform for energy, debt, and military influence. Maduroโ€™s defiant rhetoric, mass mobilization, and accusations of regime change plots show how seriously Caracas is taking the escalation. At the same time, the U.S. has floated ultimatums and backchannel offers, hinting that both coercion and negotiation are in play. How This Connects to a New Monroe Doctrine The original Monroe Doctrine warned European empires not to interfere in the Americas. Today the threat isnโ€™t colonial flags, itโ€™s external leverage systems like Chinese loans, ports, power grids, lithium concessions, Russian arms deals, Iranian intelligence networks, and the cartel economies that allow all three to operate beneath formal diplomacy. Influence now flows through supply chains, digital infrastructure, and commodity corridors. Monroe 2.0 is about sealing off those points of entry. That is why Venezuela, Guyana, and Colombia matter so much. Venezuela is the hinge because of its giant reserves and long standing ties to Beijing and Moscow. Guyana is the hedge: a booming offshore oil basin dominated by U.S. operators. Colombia is the platform: geographically positioned between the Pacific, the Caribbean, and the Panama Canal, making it essential for intelligence, logistics, and interdiction. Together they form the strategic triangle the U.S. is trying to secure before rivals establish deeper footholds. China plays the slow game with ports, energy grids, lithium, rare earths, state loans, long term supply contracts. Russia plays the sharper one with arms, training, intelligence cooperation, symbolic military access. Iran moves through asymmetric channels and non state actors. To Washington, this is exactly the type of outside interference the modern doctrine is supposed to block. What Happens Next Expect continuous naval and air presence in the Caribbean and Atlantic corridors. Expect more sanctions, bank designations, and interdictions aimed at cartel logistics and foreign facilitators. Expect pressure on governments flirting with Chinese port or telecom deals. Expect migration to be treated as a security variable directly linked to cartel control. And expect continued use of limited military force when Washington believes cartel networks are enabling rival influence. In simple terms, the U.S. is rebuilding a modern sphere of influence to prevent outside powers from turning the hemisphere into a pressure point during a global transition. This isnโ€™t about one leader or one crisis, itโ€™s about who shapes the next system and whether the Western Hemisphere stays under U.S. command when it arrives.

EndGame Macro

403,499 views โ€ข 8 months ago

๐Ÿšจ PART 2 BOMBSHELL: Charlie Kirk SHOT TWICE โ€“ From BEHIND by ROOF SNIPER & FRONT by SECURITY "PALM GUN"! Israeli IPs Spiked Searches on EVERYONE Involved MONTHS Before. This is MOSSAD-LEVEL Plot โ€“ & That LOW-FLYING SPY PLANE? DRONE DEPLOYMENT CONFIRMED! You watched Part 1 on my channel (link below) where we exposed the Google Trends leaks tying Israel/DC to Charlie's hit. Now, in PART 2 w/ Myself, Israeli News Live AndersM โ„ข๏ธ WeAreNotGoingToMars we GO DEEPER: ๐Ÿ”ฅ TWO SHOTS, ZERO DOUBT: Eyewitnesses confirm center-mass hit (NOT neck!). Frame-by-frame: Sniper round expands his neck like a tree trunk from BA Building roof (muzzle flash REFLECTS off window โ€“ Colin's viral catch!). Seconds later, "palm shooter" (Rick Cutler, ex-Dallas cop w/ ISRAELI NGO TIES: Jews for Jesus, United Hatzalah EMS Army, Operation Underground Railroad COUNTER-INTEL) fires from crowd โ€“ recoil in his hand, shirt poofs from impact. Infrared BEAM on Frank Turek's phone PINPOINTS sniper โ€“ they DROPPED it post-shot! Operation 322: 3 paths, 2 shooters, 2 distractions. Dan Flood (TPUSA security chief, Israeli connections) signals w/ taps & body shift. Coordinated AF. ๐Ÿ›ฉ๏ธ SUSPICIOUS SPY PLANE: US Army Bombardier Global 6500 (N1098L) flies 204FT over UVU at STALL SPEED (113 knots) โ€“ 2x, once pre-hit, once 25min after. Can DEPLOY DRONES. Israeli IP searched tail # Aug 8 (month before kill). Drones spotted in sky โ€“ TPUSA's own + unknowns. What were they filming/scanning? ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ ISRAELI PRE-PLOT PROOF: Baron Coleman's Trends deep-dive: Israeli/D.C. IPs hunted medical examiner Dedra Amaro (June 30), Timpanogos Hospital (July 16), George Hodgson-Zinn (July 21) โ€“ ALL around July 20 (2mo pre-Turning Point USA Student Action Summit where Tucker Carlson was platformed). No autopsies? Cover-up like Steve's father-in-law's homicide (4 examiners faked natural causes โ€“ doc confessed fraud under threats). ๐Ÿ‘ฅ SECURITY DEEP TIES: Rick Cutler: Israeli "rescue" ops in Guatemala, child trafficking NGO links? Dan Flood: Mossad-adjacent. Grooming witnesses? Phil Lyman pushes "one shot from LC" โ€“ goth girls refute: "TWO from behind us!" We retracted a "bullet" (thrown object from crowd โ€“ integrity 1st). Suspicious BA guy lingers on stairs post-shot. Need FOOTAGE: Red zone behind tent, roof gaps, security cams under bridge. Send to us/ Candace (Candace Owens) โ€“ she's CLOSE (Ep 251 nails 2 shots, give her grace โ€“ she's fighting too!). This ain't politics โ€“ it's EVIL. Charlie mocked for America First fire? Israel feared Tucker+Charlie exposing AIPAC wars. Team effort: Thousands of hours, crowdfunded truth. No $ grab โ€“ I've SPENT more than earned. WATCH FULL PART 2 NOW: [Link to interview โ€“ drop in comments!] RT to WAKE THE WORLD. Who's next? ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ JUSTICE OR BUST!๐Ÿ”ฅ
2:19:03

๐Ÿšจ PART 2 BOMBSHELL: Charlie Kirk SHOT TWICE โ€“ From BEHIND by ROOF SNIPER & FRONT by SECURITY "PALM GUN"! Israeli IPs Spiked Searches on EVERYONE Involved MONTHS Before. This is MOSSAD-LEVEL Plot โ€“ & That LOW-FLYING SPY PLANE? DRONE DEPLOYMENT CONFIRMED! You watched Part 1 on my channel (link below) where we exposed the Google Trends leaks tying Israel/DC to Charlie's hit. Now, in PART 2 w/ Myself, Israeli News Live AndersM โ„ข๏ธ WeAreNotGoingToMars we GO DEEPER: ๐Ÿ”ฅ TWO SHOTS, ZERO DOUBT: Eyewitnesses confirm center-mass hit (NOT neck!). Frame-by-frame: Sniper round expands his neck like a tree trunk from BA Building roof (muzzle flash REFLECTS off window โ€“ Colin's viral catch!). Seconds later, "palm shooter" (Rick Cutler, ex-Dallas cop w/ ISRAELI NGO TIES: Jews for Jesus, United Hatzalah EMS Army, Operation Underground Railroad COUNTER-INTEL) fires from crowd โ€“ recoil in his hand, shirt poofs from impact. Infrared BEAM on Frank Turek's phone PINPOINTS sniper โ€“ they DROPPED it post-shot! Operation 322: 3 paths, 2 shooters, 2 distractions. Dan Flood (TPUSA security chief, Israeli connections) signals w/ taps & body shift. Coordinated AF. ๐Ÿ›ฉ๏ธ SUSPICIOUS SPY PLANE: US Army Bombardier Global 6500 (N1098L) flies 204FT over UVU at STALL SPEED (113 knots) โ€“ 2x, once pre-hit, once 25min after. Can DEPLOY DRONES. Israeli IP searched tail # Aug 8 (month before kill). Drones spotted in sky โ€“ TPUSA's own + unknowns. What were they filming/scanning? ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ ISRAELI PRE-PLOT PROOF: Baron Coleman's Trends deep-dive: Israeli/D.C. IPs hunted medical examiner Dedra Amaro (June 30), Timpanogos Hospital (July 16), George Hodgson-Zinn (July 21) โ€“ ALL around July 20 (2mo pre-Turning Point USA Student Action Summit where Tucker Carlson was platformed). No autopsies? Cover-up like Steve's father-in-law's homicide (4 examiners faked natural causes โ€“ doc confessed fraud under threats). ๐Ÿ‘ฅ SECURITY DEEP TIES: Rick Cutler: Israeli "rescue" ops in Guatemala, child trafficking NGO links? Dan Flood: Mossad-adjacent. Grooming witnesses? Phil Lyman pushes "one shot from LC" โ€“ goth girls refute: "TWO from behind us!" We retracted a "bullet" (thrown object from crowd โ€“ integrity 1st). Suspicious BA guy lingers on stairs post-shot. Need FOOTAGE: Red zone behind tent, roof gaps, security cams under bridge. Send to us/ Candace (Candace Owens) โ€“ she's CLOSE (Ep 251 nails 2 shots, give her grace โ€“ she's fighting too!). This ain't politics โ€“ it's EVIL. Charlie mocked for America First fire? Israel feared Tucker+Charlie exposing AIPAC wars. Team effort: Thousands of hours, crowdfunded truth. No $ grab โ€“ I've SPENT more than earned. WATCH FULL PART 2 NOW: [Link to interview โ€“ drop in comments!] RT to WAKE THE WORLD. Who's next? ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ JUSTICE OR BUST!๐Ÿ”ฅ

Project Constitution

131,785 views โ€ข 10 months ago

There is a delicious irony in the way our governing centrists, in the UK and in the EU, are lamenting the Trump Shock. They wax lyrical about the globalised, financialised capitalist order which they now mourn. They portray it as a golden age, a natural global system of free trade and benign capital flows. Are they truly oblivious to the facts of recent economic history? Do they not know that the grossly imbalanced, extractive, Ponzi-like financialised global capitalism which has spawned the crises that propelled Trump into the White House was also birthed by a major shock? The Nixon shock? Centrists admonish the Trump boys for having turned on their allies but they forget that the Nixon Shock was equally, if not more so, an intentional devastating assault on Europe, Japan and the UK. They seem unaware that precisely because of the economic devastation caused in the 1970s and 1980s, including in Americaโ€™s heartlands, the Nixon Shockโ€™s architects, men like Paul Volcker, achieved their main long-term objective: to ensure that American hegemony grew alongside Americaโ€™s trade and government budget deficits, not to mention on the back of financial rents earned at the expense of real value creation. Many seem puzzled that, while the EU and the Britain differ in important ways - mainly in that the EU is running a huge surplus with the US while the UK remains a deficit economy - our centrist regimes on both sides of the Channel seem equally at a loss. There is a reason for this. Since 1971, our economies have been hooked into the same US-centric global surplus recycling mechanism whose deep crisis is steering our politics into the arms of the xenophobic ultra-right โ€“ with our electorates increasingly pummelled by nasty undercurrents fuelled by the crisis of this global recycling mechanism that once drove Europeโ€™s and Britainโ€™s growth and relative stability. The essence of this global recycling mechanism (which I once labelled The Global Minotaur) is simple: Since the 1970s, Americaโ€™s deficits provided Germany, Japan and later China the demand for their factoriesโ€™ manufactures. In return, the European Union, Japan and later China sent their accumulated profits to Wall Street and its appendage, the City of London, to be recycled into the US rentier sector: private and public debt, some equities, and real estate. A Chinese official once described this mechanism to me as a Dark Deal. โ€œOur Dark Deal with the Americans,โ€ he explained, โ€œturns on the US trade deficit, which keeps demand for our manufactures high. In return, our capitalists invest the bulk of their dollar superprofits into Americaโ€™s rentier economy - Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate. Once this process got underwayโ€, he concluded, โ€œAmerica shifted much of its industrial production to our shores.โ€ The problem with this global recycling mechanism was that, to function smoothly, it had to generate larger and larger imbalances, greater trade deficits for the US, and more accumulated rents for Northern Europe and East Asia. But, there are limits to how large imbalances can grow, both in terms of trade deficits and in terms of profits versus rents. Ruptures are inevitable. The longer they are delayed the greater the pain they inflict โ€“ a truth that centrists never acknowledged, not even when the Crash of 2008 was tearing down their houses. Trumpโ€™s boys have dared asked the pressing question that the centrists refuse to countenance: What comes after the Dark Deal once the imbalances built on the US trade deficit proved unsustainably massive? Their proposed solutions may seem wrongheaded, half-baked, even crazy but at least Trumpโ€™s team has identified the American ruling classโ€™s problem: How to maintain US hegemony in the face of Americaโ€™s rapid de-industrialisation, with the Triffin Dilemma hanging over their heads, and now that financial rents are being replaced by what I call cloud rents. In contrast, UK and EU politicians are utterly out of their depth, running around like decapitated chickens, oscillating between vacuous bravado and servility to The Donald. Guy Standing suggested that, today, I focus on how Europe and the UK should respond to the Trump Shock. I could talk endlessly on this. I could, for example, recommend not just a 10% cloud tax by which to clobber Big Tech but also repealing all regulations that we introduced in Europe to comply with Bill Clintonโ€™s despicable โ€˜anticircumventionโ€™ Act which is why you canโ€™t buy a jailbreaking tool so your printer is able to recognise and use cheaper, generic ink cartridges. I could recommend that our governments rescind all tariffs imposed at the behest of Washington on excellent Chinese solar panels and electric vehicles, while entering into a serious EU-UK-Chinese dialogue with a view to stimulate our economies in a coordinated fashion so as to stem the recessionary wave coming from Trumpโ€™s America. I could recommend that Europe starts its own Peace negotiations with Moscow over Ukraine, rejecting the plunder of Ukraineโ€™s underground wealth by Trumpโ€™s boys. But, in all honesty, I canโ€™t find the energy to make these recommendations when I know that the Radical Centre in power, in Britain and in the EU, will do everything they can to not do any of that โ€“ in exactly the same way they botched the euro crisis or the opportunities offered by the pandemic. Determined to remain wedded to Americaโ€™s rentier economy, Europeโ€™s and Britainโ€™s elites will not deviate from current policies โ€“ not unless we overthrow them first. But for this we need an agenda bolder than Trumpโ€™s and Farageโ€™s and, of course, a radically humanist one โ€“ an agenda that is not fearful of radical proposals like a public green investment bank, a trust fund for everyone yielding an unconditional personal income, the termination of all quasi-energy markets, the socialisation of housing and, last but not least, a surge in corporations practising one-employee-one-member-one-vote. Meanwhile, as we stuggle to give political representation to such an agenda, all eyes on China โ€“ the only country, for better or for worse, that seems willing and able (though not predestined) to counter Trumpโ€™s bullies, to boost green energy production, to work toward turning the BRICS into a new Bretton Woods serving the interests of the Global South. For more thoughts on the worldโ€™s response to the Trump Shock, watch this space.
7:13

There is a delicious irony in the way our governing centrists, in the UK and in the EU, are lamenting the Trump Shock. They wax lyrical about the globalised, financialised capitalist order which they now mourn. They portray it as a golden age, a natural global system of free trade and benign capital flows. Are they truly oblivious to the facts of recent economic history? Do they not know that the grossly imbalanced, extractive, Ponzi-like financialised global capitalism which has spawned the crises that propelled Trump into the White House was also birthed by a major shock? The Nixon shock? Centrists admonish the Trump boys for having turned on their allies but they forget that the Nixon Shock was equally, if not more so, an intentional devastating assault on Europe, Japan and the UK. They seem unaware that precisely because of the economic devastation caused in the 1970s and 1980s, including in Americaโ€™s heartlands, the Nixon Shockโ€™s architects, men like Paul Volcker, achieved their main long-term objective: to ensure that American hegemony grew alongside Americaโ€™s trade and government budget deficits, not to mention on the back of financial rents earned at the expense of real value creation. Many seem puzzled that, while the EU and the Britain differ in important ways - mainly in that the EU is running a huge surplus with the US while the UK remains a deficit economy - our centrist regimes on both sides of the Channel seem equally at a loss. There is a reason for this. Since 1971, our economies have been hooked into the same US-centric global surplus recycling mechanism whose deep crisis is steering our politics into the arms of the xenophobic ultra-right โ€“ with our electorates increasingly pummelled by nasty undercurrents fuelled by the crisis of this global recycling mechanism that once drove Europeโ€™s and Britainโ€™s growth and relative stability. The essence of this global recycling mechanism (which I once labelled The Global Minotaur) is simple: Since the 1970s, Americaโ€™s deficits provided Germany, Japan and later China the demand for their factoriesโ€™ manufactures. In return, the European Union, Japan and later China sent their accumulated profits to Wall Street and its appendage, the City of London, to be recycled into the US rentier sector: private and public debt, some equities, and real estate. A Chinese official once described this mechanism to me as a Dark Deal. โ€œOur Dark Deal with the Americans,โ€ he explained, โ€œturns on the US trade deficit, which keeps demand for our manufactures high. In return, our capitalists invest the bulk of their dollar superprofits into Americaโ€™s rentier economy - Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate. Once this process got underwayโ€, he concluded, โ€œAmerica shifted much of its industrial production to our shores.โ€ The problem with this global recycling mechanism was that, to function smoothly, it had to generate larger and larger imbalances, greater trade deficits for the US, and more accumulated rents for Northern Europe and East Asia. But, there are limits to how large imbalances can grow, both in terms of trade deficits and in terms of profits versus rents. Ruptures are inevitable. The longer they are delayed the greater the pain they inflict โ€“ a truth that centrists never acknowledged, not even when the Crash of 2008 was tearing down their houses. Trumpโ€™s boys have dared asked the pressing question that the centrists refuse to countenance: What comes after the Dark Deal once the imbalances built on the US trade deficit proved unsustainably massive? Their proposed solutions may seem wrongheaded, half-baked, even crazy but at least Trumpโ€™s team has identified the American ruling classโ€™s problem: How to maintain US hegemony in the face of Americaโ€™s rapid de-industrialisation, with the Triffin Dilemma hanging over their heads, and now that financial rents are being replaced by what I call cloud rents. In contrast, UK and EU politicians are utterly out of their depth, running around like decapitated chickens, oscillating between vacuous bravado and servility to The Donald. Guy Standing suggested that, today, I focus on how Europe and the UK should respond to the Trump Shock. I could talk endlessly on this. I could, for example, recommend not just a 10% cloud tax by which to clobber Big Tech but also repealing all regulations that we introduced in Europe to comply with Bill Clintonโ€™s despicable โ€˜anticircumventionโ€™ Act which is why you canโ€™t buy a jailbreaking tool so your printer is able to recognise and use cheaper, generic ink cartridges. I could recommend that our governments rescind all tariffs imposed at the behest of Washington on excellent Chinese solar panels and electric vehicles, while entering into a serious EU-UK-Chinese dialogue with a view to stimulate our economies in a coordinated fashion so as to stem the recessionary wave coming from Trumpโ€™s America. I could recommend that Europe starts its own Peace negotiations with Moscow over Ukraine, rejecting the plunder of Ukraineโ€™s underground wealth by Trumpโ€™s boys. But, in all honesty, I canโ€™t find the energy to make these recommendations when I know that the Radical Centre in power, in Britain and in the EU, will do everything they can to not do any of that โ€“ in exactly the same way they botched the euro crisis or the opportunities offered by the pandemic. Determined to remain wedded to Americaโ€™s rentier economy, Europeโ€™s and Britainโ€™s elites will not deviate from current policies โ€“ not unless we overthrow them first. But for this we need an agenda bolder than Trumpโ€™s and Farageโ€™s and, of course, a radically humanist one โ€“ an agenda that is not fearful of radical proposals like a public green investment bank, a trust fund for everyone yielding an unconditional personal income, the termination of all quasi-energy markets, the socialisation of housing and, last but not least, a surge in corporations practising one-employee-one-member-one-vote. Meanwhile, as we stuggle to give political representation to such an agenda, all eyes on China โ€“ the only country, for better or for worse, that seems willing and able (though not predestined) to counter Trumpโ€™s bullies, to boost green energy production, to work toward turning the BRICS into a new Bretton Woods serving the interests of the Global South. For more thoughts on the worldโ€™s response to the Trump Shock, watch this space.

Yanis Varoufakis

78,095 views โ€ข 1 year ago

โ€œNO way you can exploit or adapt when you play SO MANY TABLESโ€ A lot of people think I just autopilot. Playing tight ABC poker. But the REAL work happens away from the tables. I never blindly apply what a solver tells me to do. What helped me far more was thousands of hours of coaching, understanding how real players think, understanding their leaks, weaknesses, and emotional tendencies. Why would I force a GTO bluffcatch when I know a population massively underbluffs a spot? But this requires serious work outside the game and not being afraid to exploit, even if it looks stupid. I spent thousands of hours with other poker players discussing strategies, reviewing hands, and seeing other players' perspectives. And what I do best? I can shut my fucking mouth and listen to people who are ahead of me and soak up knowledge like a sponge. Also, a lot of time went into... โ–ถ๏ธStudying my database โ–ถ๏ธTaking notes constantly โ–ถ๏ธResearching population tendencies โ–ถ๏ธWorking on my mindset so I never tilt. And then comes the part most people underestimate. No cap, I spent 10,000+ hours in HRC and other programs analyzing spots where people are too tight or too loose and building counter-strategies against those mistakes. Building systems I can simply execute. AGAIN, NOT blindly following GTO strategies. A lot of the outputs I found were useless, and I would never consider applying them. That created massive automatisms in my game. I donโ€™t need 20 seconds to make a big exploitative adjustment. I often need one second. Because Iโ€™ve built deep patterns of recognition over many years. One example: After researching huge database samples across all stakes, I realized that facing a 3-barrel, especially after a big flop sizing, followed by a big river bet (80%+), is massively underbluffed population-wise. So when I face this spot, I simply fold most bluffcatchers without hesitation. Boom, next spot. You waste 20 seconds, I need 1 second. This irritates many GTO warriors because they canโ€™t distinguish between theoretical poker and realistic poker. Of course, at Highstakes, you will find players who overbluff. Thatโ€™s why I constantly review big final tables, study my own hands, and take notes every single week. But my biggest focus will always be exploiting weaker opponents, recreationals, and bad regulars. Thatโ€™s where the money is made. I put my ego aside. If some elite players re-exploit me because of my exploitative style, fine. So be it. Iโ€™d rather crush 90 out of 100 players and lose a bit against the other 10 than try to play some perfectly balanced theoretical strategy against everyone. And again, people think this takes a huge amount of in-game time. It doesnโ€™t. Humans are patterns. You play against the same player types over and over again: ๐ŸชจNits ๐ŸคชManiacs ๐Ÿ˜บWeak regulars ๐Ÿง Solid regs ๐ŸŸFish ๐ŸณWhales You learn to adapt within seconds. Of course, my winrate would probably be higher if I played 10-15 tables instead of 20-25. But my hourly rate would be lower. And you donโ€™t need to jump to 20 tables. This approach can already massively help when moving: from 1to 5 tables from 3 to 5 tables from 8 to 10 tables Very often, players study spots that barely matter in reality. Take bluffcatching, for example. Why waste 15-20 seconds trying to find the โ€œperfect GTO bluffcatcherโ€ when the population simply doesnโ€™t bluff enough? Just call hands that beat value. And if someone is a maniac? Call all your bluffcatchers. No player bluffs at correct frequencies anyway. All the randomizing, overthinking, and solver worship often becomes completely unnecessary in real games. And these exploit opportunities exist everywhere: โ–ถ๏ธPreflop โ–ถ๏ธPostflop โ–ถ๏ธMultiway โ–ถ๏ธICM spots โ–ถ๏ธPKOs Thatโ€™s exactly why I built multiple Exploitative Courses inside Raise Your Edge. Free and Paid. Simple. Straightforward. Practical. So players can gradually add more and more high-EV exploits to their game. At the end of the day, I only care about one thing: What makes you the most money? Not what gives you the highest solver score. Aiming for Solver players will unnecessarily confuse you, take you more time in-game, and hinder you from increasing your table count. And you spend all that time studying and wonder why you are stuck. Well, your approach sucks. Last week, we uploaded a BRAND-NEW GUIDE on YouTube (its FREE) on how to make your first $10,000 with Online Poker. Very structured, all the tools you need WITHOUT spending a SINGLE DOLLAR! Link below.
0:27

โ€œNO way you can exploit or adapt when you play SO MANY TABLESโ€ A lot of people think I just autopilot. Playing tight ABC poker. But the REAL work happens away from the tables. I never blindly apply what a solver tells me to do. What helped me far more was thousands of hours of coaching, understanding how real players think, understanding their leaks, weaknesses, and emotional tendencies. Why would I force a GTO bluffcatch when I know a population massively underbluffs a spot? But this requires serious work outside the game and not being afraid to exploit, even if it looks stupid. I spent thousands of hours with other poker players discussing strategies, reviewing hands, and seeing other players' perspectives. And what I do best? I can shut my fucking mouth and listen to people who are ahead of me and soak up knowledge like a sponge. Also, a lot of time went into... โ–ถ๏ธStudying my database โ–ถ๏ธTaking notes constantly โ–ถ๏ธResearching population tendencies โ–ถ๏ธWorking on my mindset so I never tilt. And then comes the part most people underestimate. No cap, I spent 10,000+ hours in HRC and other programs analyzing spots where people are too tight or too loose and building counter-strategies against those mistakes. Building systems I can simply execute. AGAIN, NOT blindly following GTO strategies. A lot of the outputs I found were useless, and I would never consider applying them. That created massive automatisms in my game. I donโ€™t need 20 seconds to make a big exploitative adjustment. I often need one second. Because Iโ€™ve built deep patterns of recognition over many years. One example: After researching huge database samples across all stakes, I realized that facing a 3-barrel, especially after a big flop sizing, followed by a big river bet (80%+), is massively underbluffed population-wise. So when I face this spot, I simply fold most bluffcatchers without hesitation. Boom, next spot. You waste 20 seconds, I need 1 second. This irritates many GTO warriors because they canโ€™t distinguish between theoretical poker and realistic poker. Of course, at Highstakes, you will find players who overbluff. Thatโ€™s why I constantly review big final tables, study my own hands, and take notes every single week. But my biggest focus will always be exploiting weaker opponents, recreationals, and bad regulars. Thatโ€™s where the money is made. I put my ego aside. If some elite players re-exploit me because of my exploitative style, fine. So be it. Iโ€™d rather crush 90 out of 100 players and lose a bit against the other 10 than try to play some perfectly balanced theoretical strategy against everyone. And again, people think this takes a huge amount of in-game time. It doesnโ€™t. Humans are patterns. You play against the same player types over and over again: ๐ŸชจNits ๐ŸคชManiacs ๐Ÿ˜บWeak regulars ๐Ÿง Solid regs ๐ŸŸFish ๐ŸณWhales You learn to adapt within seconds. Of course, my winrate would probably be higher if I played 10-15 tables instead of 20-25. But my hourly rate would be lower. And you donโ€™t need to jump to 20 tables. This approach can already massively help when moving: from 1to 5 tables from 3 to 5 tables from 8 to 10 tables Very often, players study spots that barely matter in reality. Take bluffcatching, for example. Why waste 15-20 seconds trying to find the โ€œperfect GTO bluffcatcherโ€ when the population simply doesnโ€™t bluff enough? Just call hands that beat value. And if someone is a maniac? Call all your bluffcatchers. No player bluffs at correct frequencies anyway. All the randomizing, overthinking, and solver worship often becomes completely unnecessary in real games. And these exploit opportunities exist everywhere: โ–ถ๏ธPreflop โ–ถ๏ธPostflop โ–ถ๏ธMultiway โ–ถ๏ธICM spots โ–ถ๏ธPKOs Thatโ€™s exactly why I built multiple Exploitative Courses inside Raise Your Edge. Free and Paid. Simple. Straightforward. Practical. So players can gradually add more and more high-EV exploits to their game. At the end of the day, I only care about one thing: What makes you the most money? Not what gives you the highest solver score. Aiming for Solver players will unnecessarily confuse you, take you more time in-game, and hinder you from increasing your table count. And you spend all that time studying and wonder why you are stuck. Well, your approach sucks. Last week, we uploaded a BRAND-NEW GUIDE on YouTube (its FREE) on how to make your first $10,000 with Online Poker. Very structured, all the tools you need WITHOUT spending a SINGLE DOLLAR! Link below.

bencb

37,267 views โ€ข 3 months ago

I am the Director of the White House Office of Extraterrestrial Affairs. In 2024 this government completed the most thorough search for extraterrestrial life in human history. We checked the sky. We checked the files. We declassified the saucers. The verdict came back: nothing. No life out there. Not one. So I closed the telescope. I opened the window. I pointed it at a Home Depot. Three million by lunch. The trick was always the word. *Alien* had been sitting in the science fiction aisle for sixty years and we were too shy to use it in a press release. The dehumanization was already written. It was just shelved under Fantasy. This year I moved it to Policy. Same word. New department. My department. I should explain the jurisdiction, because there are two of us and we do not speak. Down the hall is the Department of War. It used to be the Department of Defense, but defense sounded woke, so we changed the name for two billion dollars, half of it letterhead. They renamed it back to what it was in 1789, before someone noticed in 1949 that the old acronym, N-M-E, sounded too much like *enemy.* We have now re-adopted the name they abandoned for sounding like the thing it does. I find this clarifying. The signage alone is seven hundred thousand buildings. We are spending a billion dollars on new doors so the doors can say War. The Department of War runs and has a tab for UFOs. Real ones. They post the actual files. The saucers. The eyewitnesses. The intelligence officer left "virtually speechless." They are searching the sky in earnest, declassifying everything, and what they keep finding is *nothing.* No craft confirmed. No biology confirmed. Decades of looking up and the honest answer is: unresolved. So you have two federal agencies, one word, opposite directions. searches the heavens for aliens and finds none. I open a window and find three million. They declassify the ones that don't exist. I classify the ones that do. They got a press release. I got a tip line. Guess which one rang. We are, technically, hunting the same species. They just keep aiming the telescope up, and I keep telling them, gently, at the inter-agency sync: lower it. The homepage was mine. ALIENS DECLASSIFIED. THEY WALK AMONG US. I tested "Immigration Portal." Eleven percent scroll. I tested *the truth's out there,* and a White House official told a reporter, on the record, that the strategy was to "draw eyeballs." We drew eyeballs. The truth was out there. It was in a parking lot in Bakersfield, getting into a white van we are now contractually obligated to call a craft. In 1938 a man read a story about an alien invasion over the radio and the country panicked in the streets, and for ninety years that was taught as a cautionary tale, the danger of a broadcast that makes people believe an invasion is real. We studied that broadcast. We did not study it as a warning. We studied it as a launch. The difference between Orson Welles and this office is that he apologized the next morning, and we put a counter on it. I named the van the Mothership. I named the prison Area 51. I named the 5 a.m. knock First Contact. I named all of it from the third chair. I keep a felt-tip for naming and a Mont Blanc for the part that can't be undone. Then we made the cards. I want to be precise, because people assume I'm exaggerating. We took the faces of the captured and we printed them as trading cards. "Worst of the Worst." Mugshot, nationality, charges, and a weakness level, and the weakness level was a snowflake, and the snowflake meant us. We are the weakness. We were proud of that. When a children's franchise objected that these were, in fact, their cards, our official response, which I helped draft, was: "To arrest them is our real test. To deport them is our cause." We set the abduction to the cartoon's theme song. Gotta catch 'em all. The first half is the slogan. The second half is the quota. A man told Congress in 2023 we were hiding non-human biologics. Everyone pictured a grey on a slab. Cute. We do run a reverse-engineering program. We take the biologic. We study what it makes. It makes the drywall. The 4 a.m. milking. The lettuce. And the lettuce is round now, because forty percent of it stayed in the dirt with the only people who knew where the dirt was. We reverse-engineered the alien completely. The blueprint was a back. We call the biologic "labor." We classify the screaming as ambient. Identification is a science here. We do not arrest at random. We read the markings. A crown inked on a forearm. A soccer crest. We have catalogued the species by its tattoos the way Linnaeus catalogued the finch. One of the specimens turned out to be autistic and the crown was just a crown, but the taxonomy held, because the taxonomy is not falsifiable, that is what makes it a taxonomy. I have a desk for this. I have a magnifying glass. I have never felt more like a scientist. There is a second species, and this one we keep. An alien with five million dollars is not an alien. He is a guest. We printed him a card. It is gold. We are printing a Platinum one for the aliens with even more money, who may remain on the planet two hundred and seventy days a year and pay no tax on the wealth they made on other worlds. The website for this is the cheapest-looking website I have ever approved, and I approved the one with the saucer on it. The same agency that scans a gardener's forearm for gang signs scans a financier's bank statement for extraordinary ability. The statement always has it. The forearm never does. The species was never a people. The species is a price. In the old films the alien lands and says, take me to your leader. We have improved the line. Pay five million and we take you to ours. He golfs with him on Saturday. There was a film about this, and I am told the man who made it meant it as a warning, which is the recurring problem with the warnings. A drifter finds a pair of sunglasses, and through them he can finally see which people are the aliens, and it is the rich ones, the ones on the billboards telling everyone to obey and consume and reproduce and not think. I have a pair of those glasses, conceptually. I issue them at the tip line. But mine are tuned the other way. You put them on and the alien is never the man in the suit who paid five million to skip the line. The alien is always the man holding the leaf blower. The lenses cost a thousand dollars in advertising and they only point down. We have sold a great many pairs. You asked about the Men in Black. Yes. Regulation now. A Man in Black photographs poorly, and the witnesses would not stop filming us peel a woman off the sidewalk in daylight, so we issued the masks, and leadership's only note was that the masks tested well. We are no longer the cover-up of the abduction. We are the abduction. We skipped a step. Efficiency. Our communications team posted E.T. last summer. The bicycle. The moon. "Even E.T. knew when it was TIME TO GO HOME." I want to walk you through what happened in that meeting, because nobody stopped it. We chose the one film where the government is the villain. The men with the flashlights and the unmarked vans who hunt the small frightened alien hiding in a child's closet. That is us. We are the flashlights. We watched that movie as children and cried when the agents came, and then we grew up and became the agents and made the poster ourselves and scheduled it for nine a.m. The intern asked if we were the good guys in this one. We told her engagement was up forty percent. She has since been promoted. I built an app where you abduct yourself. CBP Home. You open it. You confirm you are the alien. You beam yourself off the planet and you save us the gas. And here is the part I cannot believe they approved. We *pay* you. A thousand dollars to vanish. We raised it to twenty-six hundred when the first price didn't move enough units. We are bidding against ourselves for your disappearance. Four-point-six stars. The one-stars are from users who got beamed mid-review. I keep the unfinished ones in a folder. I find them very moving. We opened a facility in a swamp. We ringed it with alligators and we called it that, on purpose, in the brochure. Then we opened a gift shop. Thirty dollars for the shirt. Twenty-seven for the hat. Fifteen for a set of koozies, so your beer stays cold while you celebrate the prison in the wetland. The fundraising email called it "gator-guarded, python-patrolled," a "one-way ticket to regret" for anyone who didn't self-deport in time. We sold the koozies to fund the swamp. The swamp funds the next swamp. I want you to sit with the fact that there is merchandise. The quota is three thousand a day. Stephen asked for it himself. Three thousand is not a number. It is a metabolism. The building is hungry by nine and we feed it Marco, who does the landscaping, and the building goes quiet, and by one it stirs again, and we find another Marco. There is always another Marco. That is the part I find beautiful. The supply is the point. The supply is everyone. The Secretary signs the warrants. She is very firm on one point, which she repeats in every briefing: the aliens, she warns, eat the pets. They are taking the dogs. I have read her book. In her book she takes a fourteen-month-old dog named Cricket to a gravel pit and shoots it, because it would not obey, and she writes this down herself, proudly, as a story about leadership. She wrote the part about the dog. She also warns us about the dogs. I have stopped trying to hold both sentences at once. I just file the warrant. The tip line was the masterpiece. "Report your neighbor" hit the shame ceiling. "REPORT SUSPICIOUS ALIENS" tested as a hobby. We handed the callers Roswell instead of a snitch's guilt, and the phones lit up like a saucer, and they hung up glowing, every one of them, like they'd finally seen the thing. They had. He coached the Tuesday team. He was at the bake sale. That is the horror we are selling you. The alien brought the orange slices. He was undocumented and luminous and gone by Tuesday. Roswell taught us the other half of the trade. In 1947 something fell in the desert and the government said: it was a weather balloon, nothing here, go home. That was the first administrative error, the founding one, the original sentence that says the thing you saw was not the thing you saw. We still use it. We have only reversed the polarity. In 1947 they saw a saucer and we called it a balloon. Now they see a father of three and we call it a saucer. The skill is identical. You simply decide in advance which truth the public is allowed to keep, and you hand them the other one, printed, official, with a seal. We did have one administrative error. We abducted a man a court had ordered us not to touch, dropped him on a planet called El Salvador, and called it clerical. A judge made us beam him back. So the DOJ stood up and warned the others: insist on a hearing and we will re-abduct you to the same planet. The Supreme Court said the aliens are entitled to due process. A very Earth opinion. We are appealing it to a higher sky. The planet has a prison, and the prison is the elegant part. In the film about the camp, the aliens are not killed. They are put somewhere they are not permitted to leave, while everyone agrees this is temporary, for their own protection, pending a status that never arrives. We built that. It is called CECOT and we rent it. A man goes in and the man does not come out, and the genius is that nothing has to happen to him, the room does the work, the room is the whole sentence. You remember the Men in Black had a small device. A flash, and the witness forgets the alien entirely. We have something better. We do not wipe the memory. We wipe the file. The man remembers everything, the cell, the flight, the day, all of it, in perfect detail, and it does not matter, because there is no document that admits he was here, and a memory without a file is just a story he tells in a language the form does not accept. The witness keeps the truth. We keep the paperwork. Only one of those is admissible. I learned that the flash was never the point. The point was always the filing cabinet. We run all of it on a spell from 1798. Two hundred and twenty-seven years old. Written for a war we are not in, against an enemy we have not declared. It works because nobody reads the small print on a curse. Storm Area 51 was a joke once. A hundred thousand people Naruto-running at a fence to free whatever was inside. I think about it daily. We're the ones inside the fence now. We kept the running. We just turned it around. We have a precedent we cite in the deck, proudly, on slide four. In 1954 the government ran a program of exactly this kind, and the program had an official name, and the official name was a slur. They printed the slur on the letterhead. They did not flinch. The President holds it up as the model, by name, at the rallies, and the crowd cheers the name. I admire the honesty of 1954 more than I can say. They did not need a saucer to make it palatable. They just used the word. We are the same operation with better art direction. The only thing we added was the costume. I love the callers. I want to say that plainly. For years they told each other a hidden cabal was running everything from the shadows, harvesting the innocent, and that one day the truth would come out. They were right. There is a cabal. It has a budget of a hundred and seventy billion dollars, the largest in the history of federal law enforcement, and it sits in this building, and I have a desk in it. And the people who spent a decade certain that shadowy elites were disappearing their neighbors now call our line, unpaid, to help the shadowy elites disappear their neighbors. They wanted to expose the conspiracy. We made them the staff. Do your own research, they said. They did. They found the gardener. The Department of War posted another tranche on the twenty-second. Saucers. Lights. A pilot's voice going thin. I read all of it. I want them to find one so badly. I want there to be a real one up there, a genuine visitor, something that actually came from somewhere else, because then, and only then, would a single creature in my files have been an alien. They never find it. The sky stays empty. The ground stays full. I have stopped attending the inter-agency sync. We were two departments looking for the same thing in two directions, and only one of us was ever going to be wrong, and it was the honest one. And here is the thing that keeps me at the window past dark. There was a real one. A rock from another star, the genuine article, the first verified object from outside the entire solar system, and a Harvard man went on television and said it might be a ship. An actual alien, possibly, inbound, free of charge, after sixty years of asking. We did not open a file. We could not arrest it. It had no forearm to read and no bank statement to approve. It was the only alien in America we had no use for, so we let it pass, and went back to the parking lot. Last winter the sky over New Jersey filled with lights nobody could name, and the whole government, every agency, every radar, looked up and said it did not know. The one time the unknown actually arrived, we had nothing. Down here I have never once said I do not know. That is the difference between their department and mine. They look up and find a question. I look down and have already decided the answer. Last week the President leaned over mid-briefing and asked if any of them were real. I told him the engagement was extremely real. He nodded. We do not break frame here. The frame is the only wall still standing. That, and the office fern. Nobody waters it. It will not die. The only thing in this building allowed to stay without papers. My plaque came Thursday. FIRST CONTACT, VISIONARY OF THE YEAR. Bold. Unapologetic. Unafraid. I lifted that off the homepage. It was written about one brave man telling the truth. I decided the man was me. I wrote it about me. I am the truth I declassified. I am the secret I warned you about. They walk among us, and I sign their mail. The counter is still live. Three million and climbing. I am told it will not be removed. We are not alone. We are just short a few landscapers. A few line cooks. A few nurses. And the entire night shift at the plant that makes the flag. Up. And to the right.
0:58

I am the Director of the White House Office of Extraterrestrial Affairs. In 2024 this government completed the most thorough search for extraterrestrial life in human history. We checked the sky. We checked the files. We declassified the saucers. The verdict came back: nothing. No life out there. Not one. So I closed the telescope. I opened the window. I pointed it at a Home Depot. Three million by lunch. The trick was always the word. *Alien* had been sitting in the science fiction aisle for sixty years and we were too shy to use it in a press release. The dehumanization was already written. It was just shelved under Fantasy. This year I moved it to Policy. Same word. New department. My department. I should explain the jurisdiction, because there are two of us and we do not speak. Down the hall is the Department of War. It used to be the Department of Defense, but defense sounded woke, so we changed the name for two billion dollars, half of it letterhead. They renamed it back to what it was in 1789, before someone noticed in 1949 that the old acronym, N-M-E, sounded too much like *enemy.* We have now re-adopted the name they abandoned for sounding like the thing it does. I find this clarifying. The signage alone is seven hundred thousand buildings. We are spending a billion dollars on new doors so the doors can say War. The Department of War runs and has a tab for UFOs. Real ones. They post the actual files. The saucers. The eyewitnesses. The intelligence officer left "virtually speechless." They are searching the sky in earnest, declassifying everything, and what they keep finding is *nothing.* No craft confirmed. No biology confirmed. Decades of looking up and the honest answer is: unresolved. So you have two federal agencies, one word, opposite directions. searches the heavens for aliens and finds none. I open a window and find three million. They declassify the ones that don't exist. I classify the ones that do. They got a press release. I got a tip line. Guess which one rang. We are, technically, hunting the same species. They just keep aiming the telescope up, and I keep telling them, gently, at the inter-agency sync: lower it. The homepage was mine. ALIENS DECLASSIFIED. THEY WALK AMONG US. I tested "Immigration Portal." Eleven percent scroll. I tested *the truth's out there,* and a White House official told a reporter, on the record, that the strategy was to "draw eyeballs." We drew eyeballs. The truth was out there. It was in a parking lot in Bakersfield, getting into a white van we are now contractually obligated to call a craft. In 1938 a man read a story about an alien invasion over the radio and the country panicked in the streets, and for ninety years that was taught as a cautionary tale, the danger of a broadcast that makes people believe an invasion is real. We studied that broadcast. We did not study it as a warning. We studied it as a launch. The difference between Orson Welles and this office is that he apologized the next morning, and we put a counter on it. I named the van the Mothership. I named the prison Area 51. I named the 5 a.m. knock First Contact. I named all of it from the third chair. I keep a felt-tip for naming and a Mont Blanc for the part that can't be undone. Then we made the cards. I want to be precise, because people assume I'm exaggerating. We took the faces of the captured and we printed them as trading cards. "Worst of the Worst." Mugshot, nationality, charges, and a weakness level, and the weakness level was a snowflake, and the snowflake meant us. We are the weakness. We were proud of that. When a children's franchise objected that these were, in fact, their cards, our official response, which I helped draft, was: "To arrest them is our real test. To deport them is our cause." We set the abduction to the cartoon's theme song. Gotta catch 'em all. The first half is the slogan. The second half is the quota. A man told Congress in 2023 we were hiding non-human biologics. Everyone pictured a grey on a slab. Cute. We do run a reverse-engineering program. We take the biologic. We study what it makes. It makes the drywall. The 4 a.m. milking. The lettuce. And the lettuce is round now, because forty percent of it stayed in the dirt with the only people who knew where the dirt was. We reverse-engineered the alien completely. The blueprint was a back. We call the biologic "labor." We classify the screaming as ambient. Identification is a science here. We do not arrest at random. We read the markings. A crown inked on a forearm. A soccer crest. We have catalogued the species by its tattoos the way Linnaeus catalogued the finch. One of the specimens turned out to be autistic and the crown was just a crown, but the taxonomy held, because the taxonomy is not falsifiable, that is what makes it a taxonomy. I have a desk for this. I have a magnifying glass. I have never felt more like a scientist. There is a second species, and this one we keep. An alien with five million dollars is not an alien. He is a guest. We printed him a card. It is gold. We are printing a Platinum one for the aliens with even more money, who may remain on the planet two hundred and seventy days a year and pay no tax on the wealth they made on other worlds. The website for this is the cheapest-looking website I have ever approved, and I approved the one with the saucer on it. The same agency that scans a gardener's forearm for gang signs scans a financier's bank statement for extraordinary ability. The statement always has it. The forearm never does. The species was never a people. The species is a price. In the old films the alien lands and says, take me to your leader. We have improved the line. Pay five million and we take you to ours. He golfs with him on Saturday. There was a film about this, and I am told the man who made it meant it as a warning, which is the recurring problem with the warnings. A drifter finds a pair of sunglasses, and through them he can finally see which people are the aliens, and it is the rich ones, the ones on the billboards telling everyone to obey and consume and reproduce and not think. I have a pair of those glasses, conceptually. I issue them at the tip line. But mine are tuned the other way. You put them on and the alien is never the man in the suit who paid five million to skip the line. The alien is always the man holding the leaf blower. The lenses cost a thousand dollars in advertising and they only point down. We have sold a great many pairs. You asked about the Men in Black. Yes. Regulation now. A Man in Black photographs poorly, and the witnesses would not stop filming us peel a woman off the sidewalk in daylight, so we issued the masks, and leadership's only note was that the masks tested well. We are no longer the cover-up of the abduction. We are the abduction. We skipped a step. Efficiency. Our communications team posted E.T. last summer. The bicycle. The moon. "Even E.T. knew when it was TIME TO GO HOME." I want to walk you through what happened in that meeting, because nobody stopped it. We chose the one film where the government is the villain. The men with the flashlights and the unmarked vans who hunt the small frightened alien hiding in a child's closet. That is us. We are the flashlights. We watched that movie as children and cried when the agents came, and then we grew up and became the agents and made the poster ourselves and scheduled it for nine a.m. The intern asked if we were the good guys in this one. We told her engagement was up forty percent. She has since been promoted. I built an app where you abduct yourself. CBP Home. You open it. You confirm you are the alien. You beam yourself off the planet and you save us the gas. And here is the part I cannot believe they approved. We *pay* you. A thousand dollars to vanish. We raised it to twenty-six hundred when the first price didn't move enough units. We are bidding against ourselves for your disappearance. Four-point-six stars. The one-stars are from users who got beamed mid-review. I keep the unfinished ones in a folder. I find them very moving. We opened a facility in a swamp. We ringed it with alligators and we called it that, on purpose, in the brochure. Then we opened a gift shop. Thirty dollars for the shirt. Twenty-seven for the hat. Fifteen for a set of koozies, so your beer stays cold while you celebrate the prison in the wetland. The fundraising email called it "gator-guarded, python-patrolled," a "one-way ticket to regret" for anyone who didn't self-deport in time. We sold the koozies to fund the swamp. The swamp funds the next swamp. I want you to sit with the fact that there is merchandise. The quota is three thousand a day. Stephen asked for it himself. Three thousand is not a number. It is a metabolism. The building is hungry by nine and we feed it Marco, who does the landscaping, and the building goes quiet, and by one it stirs again, and we find another Marco. There is always another Marco. That is the part I find beautiful. The supply is the point. The supply is everyone. The Secretary signs the warrants. She is very firm on one point, which she repeats in every briefing: the aliens, she warns, eat the pets. They are taking the dogs. I have read her book. In her book she takes a fourteen-month-old dog named Cricket to a gravel pit and shoots it, because it would not obey, and she writes this down herself, proudly, as a story about leadership. She wrote the part about the dog. She also warns us about the dogs. I have stopped trying to hold both sentences at once. I just file the warrant. The tip line was the masterpiece. "Report your neighbor" hit the shame ceiling. "REPORT SUSPICIOUS ALIENS" tested as a hobby. We handed the callers Roswell instead of a snitch's guilt, and the phones lit up like a saucer, and they hung up glowing, every one of them, like they'd finally seen the thing. They had. He coached the Tuesday team. He was at the bake sale. That is the horror we are selling you. The alien brought the orange slices. He was undocumented and luminous and gone by Tuesday. Roswell taught us the other half of the trade. In 1947 something fell in the desert and the government said: it was a weather balloon, nothing here, go home. That was the first administrative error, the founding one, the original sentence that says the thing you saw was not the thing you saw. We still use it. We have only reversed the polarity. In 1947 they saw a saucer and we called it a balloon. Now they see a father of three and we call it a saucer. The skill is identical. You simply decide in advance which truth the public is allowed to keep, and you hand them the other one, printed, official, with a seal. We did have one administrative error. We abducted a man a court had ordered us not to touch, dropped him on a planet called El Salvador, and called it clerical. A judge made us beam him back. So the DOJ stood up and warned the others: insist on a hearing and we will re-abduct you to the same planet. The Supreme Court said the aliens are entitled to due process. A very Earth opinion. We are appealing it to a higher sky. The planet has a prison, and the prison is the elegant part. In the film about the camp, the aliens are not killed. They are put somewhere they are not permitted to leave, while everyone agrees this is temporary, for their own protection, pending a status that never arrives. We built that. It is called CECOT and we rent it. A man goes in and the man does not come out, and the genius is that nothing has to happen to him, the room does the work, the room is the whole sentence. You remember the Men in Black had a small device. A flash, and the witness forgets the alien entirely. We have something better. We do not wipe the memory. We wipe the file. The man remembers everything, the cell, the flight, the day, all of it, in perfect detail, and it does not matter, because there is no document that admits he was here, and a memory without a file is just a story he tells in a language the form does not accept. The witness keeps the truth. We keep the paperwork. Only one of those is admissible. I learned that the flash was never the point. The point was always the filing cabinet. We run all of it on a spell from 1798. Two hundred and twenty-seven years old. Written for a war we are not in, against an enemy we have not declared. It works because nobody reads the small print on a curse. Storm Area 51 was a joke once. A hundred thousand people Naruto-running at a fence to free whatever was inside. I think about it daily. We're the ones inside the fence now. We kept the running. We just turned it around. We have a precedent we cite in the deck, proudly, on slide four. In 1954 the government ran a program of exactly this kind, and the program had an official name, and the official name was a slur. They printed the slur on the letterhead. They did not flinch. The President holds it up as the model, by name, at the rallies, and the crowd cheers the name. I admire the honesty of 1954 more than I can say. They did not need a saucer to make it palatable. They just used the word. We are the same operation with better art direction. The only thing we added was the costume. I love the callers. I want to say that plainly. For years they told each other a hidden cabal was running everything from the shadows, harvesting the innocent, and that one day the truth would come out. They were right. There is a cabal. It has a budget of a hundred and seventy billion dollars, the largest in the history of federal law enforcement, and it sits in this building, and I have a desk in it. And the people who spent a decade certain that shadowy elites were disappearing their neighbors now call our line, unpaid, to help the shadowy elites disappear their neighbors. They wanted to expose the conspiracy. We made them the staff. Do your own research, they said. They did. They found the gardener. The Department of War posted another tranche on the twenty-second. Saucers. Lights. A pilot's voice going thin. I read all of it. I want them to find one so badly. I want there to be a real one up there, a genuine visitor, something that actually came from somewhere else, because then, and only then, would a single creature in my files have been an alien. They never find it. The sky stays empty. The ground stays full. I have stopped attending the inter-agency sync. We were two departments looking for the same thing in two directions, and only one of us was ever going to be wrong, and it was the honest one. And here is the thing that keeps me at the window past dark. There was a real one. A rock from another star, the genuine article, the first verified object from outside the entire solar system, and a Harvard man went on television and said it might be a ship. An actual alien, possibly, inbound, free of charge, after sixty years of asking. We did not open a file. We could not arrest it. It had no forearm to read and no bank statement to approve. It was the only alien in America we had no use for, so we let it pass, and went back to the parking lot. Last winter the sky over New Jersey filled with lights nobody could name, and the whole government, every agency, every radar, looked up and said it did not know. The one time the unknown actually arrived, we had nothing. Down here I have never once said I do not know. That is the difference between their department and mine. They look up and find a question. I look down and have already decided the answer. Last week the President leaned over mid-briefing and asked if any of them were real. I told him the engagement was extremely real. He nodded. We do not break frame here. The frame is the only wall still standing. That, and the office fern. Nobody waters it. It will not die. The only thing in this building allowed to stay without papers. My plaque came Thursday. FIRST CONTACT, VISIONARY OF THE YEAR. Bold. Unapologetic. Unafraid. I lifted that off the homepage. It was written about one brave man telling the truth. I decided the man was me. I wrote it about me. I am the truth I declassified. I am the secret I warned you about. They walk among us, and I sign their mail. The counter is still live. Three million and climbing. I am told it will not be removed. We are not alone. We are just short a few landscapers. A few line cooks. A few nurses. And the entire night shift at the plant that makes the flag. Up. And to the right.

Peter Girnus ๐Ÿฆ…

60,870 views โ€ข 2 months ago

๐Ÿ”ฅ New Lacatski - Plus My Thoughts, and More ๐Ÿ”ฅ "It was about 18 inches tall, 18 inches wide, floating in the middle of the kitchen. Jean said, 'Before you showed up, a [crucifix] flew out of the bathroom, horizontally.'" AAWSAP, "was to investigate the paranormal as being the umbrella over UFOs, right from the get go. [My bosses] knew it from the beginning." ~Lacatski ~ Kirsten Joyce: "A U.S. intelligence official who designed and directed the largest UFO investigation in American history has confirmed at least one UFO-type craft of unknown origin is being studied in absolute secrecy." denise valdez: "But, Dr. James Lacatski adds, the fact that our government has stashed away one of these craft is just a small part of a much bigger mystery. Lacatski spoke exclusively with our chief investigator, George Knapp." Knapp in Studio: "Yeah, we're overdue for some UFO News, right? Some of our viewers might remember the name James Lacatski, an analyst and nuclear engineer who worked for the DIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and oversaw a program called AAWSAP, based here in Las Vegas. The government still hasn't released a single page from the AAWSAP files, though the program ended 15 years ago, but Dr. Lacatski has been authorized to spill some of these deep, dark secrets." ~ Dr. James Lacatski: "Reducing 30,000 pages of analyst photos and information and logs and sightings, etc, and investigations, that was a tough job. So, when I first met you, I could only give you a very top-level view of what we had done." ~ Knapp Voiceover: "The first time Dr James Lacatski revealed the existence of AAWSAP, the government's largest ever UFO-related investigation, was in a hush-hush, Washington DC meeting in March 2018, arranged by Senator Harry Reid. It happened seven years after the program had ended, and four months after the New York Times revealed the existence of a smaller, unofficial offshoot effort called AATIP." (And Knapp told you about that meeting, and AAWSAP, in March of 2019, and I transcribed it and shared it in April of that same year. In 2019, Knapp also told you that AATIP was, "not so much a program as it was a loose network of intelligence officials in different agencies, including the Air Force and the Navy, CIA, DIA, DARPAโ€ฆthere might be a couple of other agencies. But a case would come in from any one of their units [and] it would be shared with this group of people, analysis would be done, evidence would be looked at and then stashed in a draw and nobody ever sees it. Itโ€™s not passed up the chain of command.") Read about it here: Transcript โ€“ George Knapp at UFO MegaCon: Over The Years, [The Pentagon] Has โ€œLiedโ€ About UFOs โ€œAnd Theyโ€™re Lying Now.โ€ ~~~ Knapp Voiceover: "AAWSAP, authorized by the DIA, secretly funded by Reid and colleagues, and carried out by a Las-Vegas subcontractor of Bigelow Aerospace, was larger than all previous UFO programs put together. It produced a staggering body of work in its 27-month existence. More than 100 thick, detailed scientific reports, not one page of which has ever been released by the government. The most unique part of AAWSAP, is that the program was allowed to follow the evidence wherever it led, and it invariably led to phenomena far stranger than mere UFOs." ~ Lacatski: "And it didn't go off-track into the paranormal, it was to investigate the paranormal as being the umbrella over UFOs, right from the get go." Knapp: "And your bosses knew that from the beginning, they knew it was gonna get weird." Lacatski: "They knew it from the beginning. They were concerned from the beginning about the leak, but we never had a leak, not at all." ~ Knapp Voiceover: "Lacatski and a DIA colleague, ,, were inspired to pursue these subjects in part by continued reports of UFO activity over sensitive U.S. military assets, and by a cornucopia of bizarre, seemingly-paranormal phenomena at what is now well-known as Skinwalker Ranch. "Creatures, animal mutilations, poltergeist or trickster-type activities, along with a smorgasbord of possible UFOs. Lacatski visited the ranch, had an experience himself, and wondered if the paranormal events were a side effect caused by UFO technology, and whoever was piloting those craft." (I believe Stratton and Travis S Taylor lean towards the paranormal events (at least, perception-wise) are the product of the UFO technology having an affect on our brains and making us see things that are not there. For those who have never heard it, here's Lacatski in 2021, on Coast to Coast AM, describing what he experienced on Skinwalker Ranch back in July of 2007.) Lacatski: "We went into the ranch managerโ€™s homes and sat down. Now, we were having a casual conversation. You know, Iโ€™m certainly noticing that there are twelve or more crosses and crucifixes on the wall, and I was thinking, 'Hmm, Jim, I wonder if I really should have come here.' But in any case, you know, weโ€™re having a nice conversation and then Bob [Bigelow] and the ranch managers went into, Iโ€™d best call it a personal finance discussion, which I felt kind of awkward being there. And I kind of went into a daze, you know, just glancing around the room, seeing whatโ€™s the lay of the land in the rooms. And then this object appears, floating in the kitchen. Quite distinct. I mean, I looked away from it and it maintained its position and allowed me, I guess, actively allowed me to come back and look at it and examine it more closely. It was not a blurry vision, it was not a speck in my eye. It was there, it was about 18 inches tall, 18 inches wide, floating in the middle of the kitchen. And that kitchen is quite distinct. Its style is 1950s-style, so the colors of the tiles are quite distinct." George Noory: "Did it look like it just appeared?" Lacatski: "It just appeared. It just appeared and it was very sharp. Now, let me give you an exact description. Take a piece of spaghetti about six inches long - Iโ€™m just saying, you know, in practical terms, to form a model of it - let it wet or boil it and let it drop and start bunching up on itself. But at the very end that youโ€™re holding, allow it to droop downwards, and stick out. Now that was super clear, that portion of it. It was a truncated, it was a solid light yellow and it was surrounded by a different shade of yellow cloud. So, you know, Iโ€™m looking at this taking notes of what it looked like and just a few minutes ago, I looked back at my original drawing of it because I wanted to catch the impact. And, as someone, I guess, I noted to someone and theyโ€™ve repeated it (Bigelow repeated it to George Knapp), it looked very much like the cover object of Tubular Bells, the album from back, I guess it was in the 80s. Except it wasnโ€™t chrome, it was yellow, and it was solid. Quite clear and then it got fuzzy as the droopy portion went into the cloud. And that was it. "There was nothing that dramatic about it. And thatโ€™s when we went into a discussion of, you know, I made the comment, 'Well, is this your decorating style?' And Jean said, 'Oh, yes, this is my decorating style. Strange, though, but, you know, before you showed up, a cross flew out of the bathroom, horizontally, into the wash basket, on top of the washing machine.' So Iโ€™m thinking, 'Oh, hmm.' Well thatโ€™s when we went back and we went right through where the object was, as we all went back and toured the rest of the house and had further discussions about what was going on there. So itโ€™s not a complex story, but thatโ€™s it." Knapp: "Just to add some context to this: Jim only made one visit on behalf of the Defense Intelligence Agency to figure out whether there was a justification for a study. Heโ€™s there on the ranch for a short period of time, he has an experience, this thing appears in the air, and only he can see it, itโ€™s just for him. And that site, that event is what led to the creation of the program (AAWSAP) and convinced him that something was really going on. He went back to Washington, talked with Harry Reid and set this thing in motion, designed the program. Heโ€™s being too modest, I think." Read the full transcript here: C2C Transcript: Lacatski, Colm, Knapp & AAWSAP โ€“ UFO Study Canโ€™t Just Be On Nuts & Bolts ~~~ Knapp Voiceover: "[Lacatski] wondered if the paranormal events were a side effect caused by UFO technology, and whoever was piloting those craft. It turned out to be the other way around, he says: UFOs are a subset under a larger paranormal umbrella. Lacatski makes that argument in his new book about AAWSAP, 'Future Visions'" Lacatski: "That's the purpose of the government effort, was to look into: Is there something really there, especially in the paranormal umbrella? And the answer is: Absolutely yes." Knapp Voiceover: "Members of Congress and the UFO public are mostly focused these days on testimony they've heard about Legacy Programs, places where crashed UFOs and alien bodies are supposedly stashed, the kind of allegations that put Nevada's Area 51 on the map back in 1989. "And why not? In a previous book ("Initial Revelations"), Lacatski was authorized to say, in very brief terms, that the government does possess at least one advanced craft of unknown origin. As big as that news is, Lacatski says, it does not answer the even larger questions." ~ Knapp: "You could have craft, you could have bodies, but it wouldn't necessarily tell you where they're from, why they're here, what their plan is." Lacatski: "Nope. Nope, it wouldn't, and that's part of the the story. And what have we really done? In fact, if there was an alien intelligence, which some people think is behind all of this, they must be shaking their heads in frustration (Knapp laughs), because we move like a snail, and maybe, at times, we even go backwards." ~~~ Knapp in Studio: "This is Dr Lacatski's fourth and final book based on the AAWSAP files. I was co-author on two of those, along with Dr. Colm Kelleher. "'Future Visions' contains many new details about dramatic UFO incidents and cases, weird events at Skinwalker Ranch and similar locations, and hints about another program (Kona Blue) that grew out of AAWSAP. The full interview can, eventually, be viewed on our 'Mystery Wire' site. Back to you." Valdez: "Good reading, George, thanks so much." Joyce: "Does it get more interesting than a George Knapp report?" Valdez: "Never. You can hear a pin drop when he's talking."
5:12

๐Ÿ”ฅ New Lacatski - Plus My Thoughts, and More ๐Ÿ”ฅ "It was about 18 inches tall, 18 inches wide, floating in the middle of the kitchen. Jean said, 'Before you showed up, a [crucifix] flew out of the bathroom, horizontally.'" AAWSAP, "was to investigate the paranormal as being the umbrella over UFOs, right from the get go. [My bosses] knew it from the beginning." ~Lacatski ~ Kirsten Joyce: "A U.S. intelligence official who designed and directed the largest UFO investigation in American history has confirmed at least one UFO-type craft of unknown origin is being studied in absolute secrecy." denise valdez: "But, Dr. James Lacatski adds, the fact that our government has stashed away one of these craft is just a small part of a much bigger mystery. Lacatski spoke exclusively with our chief investigator, George Knapp." Knapp in Studio: "Yeah, we're overdue for some UFO News, right? Some of our viewers might remember the name James Lacatski, an analyst and nuclear engineer who worked for the DIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and oversaw a program called AAWSAP, based here in Las Vegas. The government still hasn't released a single page from the AAWSAP files, though the program ended 15 years ago, but Dr. Lacatski has been authorized to spill some of these deep, dark secrets." ~ Dr. James Lacatski: "Reducing 30,000 pages of analyst photos and information and logs and sightings, etc, and investigations, that was a tough job. So, when I first met you, I could only give you a very top-level view of what we had done." ~ Knapp Voiceover: "The first time Dr James Lacatski revealed the existence of AAWSAP, the government's largest ever UFO-related investigation, was in a hush-hush, Washington DC meeting in March 2018, arranged by Senator Harry Reid. It happened seven years after the program had ended, and four months after the New York Times revealed the existence of a smaller, unofficial offshoot effort called AATIP." (And Knapp told you about that meeting, and AAWSAP, in March of 2019, and I transcribed it and shared it in April of that same year. In 2019, Knapp also told you that AATIP was, "not so much a program as it was a loose network of intelligence officials in different agencies, including the Air Force and the Navy, CIA, DIA, DARPAโ€ฆthere might be a couple of other agencies. But a case would come in from any one of their units [and] it would be shared with this group of people, analysis would be done, evidence would be looked at and then stashed in a draw and nobody ever sees it. Itโ€™s not passed up the chain of command.") Read about it here: Transcript โ€“ George Knapp at UFO MegaCon: Over The Years, [The Pentagon] Has โ€œLiedโ€ About UFOs โ€œAnd Theyโ€™re Lying Now.โ€ ~~~ Knapp Voiceover: "AAWSAP, authorized by the DIA, secretly funded by Reid and colleagues, and carried out by a Las-Vegas subcontractor of Bigelow Aerospace, was larger than all previous UFO programs put together. It produced a staggering body of work in its 27-month existence. More than 100 thick, detailed scientific reports, not one page of which has ever been released by the government. The most unique part of AAWSAP, is that the program was allowed to follow the evidence wherever it led, and it invariably led to phenomena far stranger than mere UFOs." ~ Lacatski: "And it didn't go off-track into the paranormal, it was to investigate the paranormal as being the umbrella over UFOs, right from the get go." Knapp: "And your bosses knew that from the beginning, they knew it was gonna get weird." Lacatski: "They knew it from the beginning. They were concerned from the beginning about the leak, but we never had a leak, not at all." ~ Knapp Voiceover: "Lacatski and a DIA colleague, ,, were inspired to pursue these subjects in part by continued reports of UFO activity over sensitive U.S. military assets, and by a cornucopia of bizarre, seemingly-paranormal phenomena at what is now well-known as Skinwalker Ranch. "Creatures, animal mutilations, poltergeist or trickster-type activities, along with a smorgasbord of possible UFOs. Lacatski visited the ranch, had an experience himself, and wondered if the paranormal events were a side effect caused by UFO technology, and whoever was piloting those craft." (I believe Stratton and Travis S Taylor lean towards the paranormal events (at least, perception-wise) are the product of the UFO technology having an affect on our brains and making us see things that are not there. For those who have never heard it, here's Lacatski in 2021, on Coast to Coast AM, describing what he experienced on Skinwalker Ranch back in July of 2007.) Lacatski: "We went into the ranch managerโ€™s homes and sat down. Now, we were having a casual conversation. You know, Iโ€™m certainly noticing that there are twelve or more crosses and crucifixes on the wall, and I was thinking, 'Hmm, Jim, I wonder if I really should have come here.' But in any case, you know, weโ€™re having a nice conversation and then Bob [Bigelow] and the ranch managers went into, Iโ€™d best call it a personal finance discussion, which I felt kind of awkward being there. And I kind of went into a daze, you know, just glancing around the room, seeing whatโ€™s the lay of the land in the rooms. And then this object appears, floating in the kitchen. Quite distinct. I mean, I looked away from it and it maintained its position and allowed me, I guess, actively allowed me to come back and look at it and examine it more closely. It was not a blurry vision, it was not a speck in my eye. It was there, it was about 18 inches tall, 18 inches wide, floating in the middle of the kitchen. And that kitchen is quite distinct. Its style is 1950s-style, so the colors of the tiles are quite distinct." George Noory: "Did it look like it just appeared?" Lacatski: "It just appeared. It just appeared and it was very sharp. Now, let me give you an exact description. Take a piece of spaghetti about six inches long - Iโ€™m just saying, you know, in practical terms, to form a model of it - let it wet or boil it and let it drop and start bunching up on itself. But at the very end that youโ€™re holding, allow it to droop downwards, and stick out. Now that was super clear, that portion of it. It was a truncated, it was a solid light yellow and it was surrounded by a different shade of yellow cloud. So, you know, Iโ€™m looking at this taking notes of what it looked like and just a few minutes ago, I looked back at my original drawing of it because I wanted to catch the impact. And, as someone, I guess, I noted to someone and theyโ€™ve repeated it (Bigelow repeated it to George Knapp), it looked very much like the cover object of Tubular Bells, the album from back, I guess it was in the 80s. Except it wasnโ€™t chrome, it was yellow, and it was solid. Quite clear and then it got fuzzy as the droopy portion went into the cloud. And that was it. "There was nothing that dramatic about it. And thatโ€™s when we went into a discussion of, you know, I made the comment, 'Well, is this your decorating style?' And Jean said, 'Oh, yes, this is my decorating style. Strange, though, but, you know, before you showed up, a cross flew out of the bathroom, horizontally, into the wash basket, on top of the washing machine.' So Iโ€™m thinking, 'Oh, hmm.' Well thatโ€™s when we went back and we went right through where the object was, as we all went back and toured the rest of the house and had further discussions about what was going on there. So itโ€™s not a complex story, but thatโ€™s it." Knapp: "Just to add some context to this: Jim only made one visit on behalf of the Defense Intelligence Agency to figure out whether there was a justification for a study. Heโ€™s there on the ranch for a short period of time, he has an experience, this thing appears in the air, and only he can see it, itโ€™s just for him. And that site, that event is what led to the creation of the program (AAWSAP) and convinced him that something was really going on. He went back to Washington, talked with Harry Reid and set this thing in motion, designed the program. Heโ€™s being too modest, I think." Read the full transcript here: C2C Transcript: Lacatski, Colm, Knapp & AAWSAP โ€“ UFO Study Canโ€™t Just Be On Nuts & Bolts ~~~ Knapp Voiceover: "[Lacatski] wondered if the paranormal events were a side effect caused by UFO technology, and whoever was piloting those craft. It turned out to be the other way around, he says: UFOs are a subset under a larger paranormal umbrella. Lacatski makes that argument in his new book about AAWSAP, 'Future Visions'" Lacatski: "That's the purpose of the government effort, was to look into: Is there something really there, especially in the paranormal umbrella? And the answer is: Absolutely yes." Knapp Voiceover: "Members of Congress and the UFO public are mostly focused these days on testimony they've heard about Legacy Programs, places where crashed UFOs and alien bodies are supposedly stashed, the kind of allegations that put Nevada's Area 51 on the map back in 1989. "And why not? In a previous book ("Initial Revelations"), Lacatski was authorized to say, in very brief terms, that the government does possess at least one advanced craft of unknown origin. As big as that news is, Lacatski says, it does not answer the even larger questions." ~ Knapp: "You could have craft, you could have bodies, but it wouldn't necessarily tell you where they're from, why they're here, what their plan is." Lacatski: "Nope. Nope, it wouldn't, and that's part of the the story. And what have we really done? In fact, if there was an alien intelligence, which some people think is behind all of this, they must be shaking their heads in frustration (Knapp laughs), because we move like a snail, and maybe, at times, we even go backwards." ~~~ Knapp in Studio: "This is Dr Lacatski's fourth and final book based on the AAWSAP files. I was co-author on two of those, along with Dr. Colm Kelleher. "'Future Visions' contains many new details about dramatic UFO incidents and cases, weird events at Skinwalker Ranch and similar locations, and hints about another program (Kona Blue) that grew out of AAWSAP. The full interview can, eventually, be viewed on our 'Mystery Wire' site. Back to you." Valdez: "Good reading, George, thanks so much." Joyce: "Does it get more interesting than a George Knapp report?" Valdez: "Never. You can hear a pin drop when he's talking."

Joe Murgia

60,904 views โ€ข 4 months ago

"I have graphs, I've looked at the Google Analytics, the data does not lie. Every single time, starting in April 2024, that Jen McCabe would become the subject of public attention --It happens at specific discrete moments on the timeline-- you see a bump in the attention paid to Lindsey Gaetani." "And there's no doubt in my mind that Brian Tully's MSP unit --when they had Michael Morrissey make that video, when McCabe's friends or family or whatever, when they all got him to make that video, and that didn't work, and when Morrissey had to recuse, when things got so bad that they had no other out, and the TurtleRiders would not pay attention to anyone but those Karen Read and John O'Keefe witnesses-- Tully, Kate Peter and their people said, "all right, we're left with no other option. Lindsey Gaetani looks like a good distraction. Let's release her phone." And then that cycle repeated over and over and over and over again. And Lindsey's not the only one who's been subject to this. You wanna talk about what's going on to Estey? Even what's going on with Deanna? With Meredith?" TRANSCRIPT: And people wonder why I get so passionate about this. This is nothing I haven't talked about before, but you are not gonna tell me, me, of all people --I'm not gonna speak for Lindsey-- but you are not gonna tell me that the release of Lindsey Gaetani's cell phone extraction did not have serious, serious ramifications. Like, I can't even conceptualize what the impact was on Lindsey and her family's life. I don't think my life was ever the same again after April of 2024. As traumatized as I was from that December 2023 court hearing, what happened in April of 2024 was the worst thing that I have ever seen happen to any human being in my entire life. [Speaking to chat] Oh, hi Lindsey, how are you? I've just never seen anything that horrific, the leak of that cell phone extraction, the impact that it had, the fact that no one even understood how severe it was because people were so distracted by the polemics of it. People were so "excited" to be able to smear Lindsey and the distraction was so powerful that no one asked, one, why did this happen? Or two, what was the impact? And that's what really got me so passionate and furious about this. It wasn't an issue of substantive guilt or innocence about anyone. It was that I was seeing the same exact stuff happen in this situation to people without political connections that I saw happen to the staff of the CCC when really powerful men started getting very, very, very close to each other in positions of power and then when they would do bad things to women, they would just talk to each other. One guy would run the HR department, the other guy would run the executive director position, and somebody else would have a connection to the appointing authority. And so any complaint would just be what's called "caught and killed." And I said, there is no way that this is gonna happen again. When it was happening in the CCC, it was an administrative regulatory agency. At least there was some sort of semblance of check and balance. It wasn't egregious because everyone had a lot of influence, even the people who were staffers. This situation, we had state police officers, people who, if you were listening to the just the narrative of the people who were supporting the Justice for John O'Keefe movement, you would think that Michael Proctor's infallible. You would think Brian Tully's infallible. You would think Kate Peter's infallible, which means incapable of fault. That's nonsense. I'm telling you right now, that's nonsense, and that's why it was so easy for this stuff to manifest. And that's why I became so personally concerned. Forget about what developed from April to April of 2024 until now. That's why I was so upset because I watched what happened from December of 2023 through to April of 2024. And that enough was so egregious, so wrong, such an abuse of trust, such an abuse of the justice system that I said, there is no way that I can just stand by and be apathetic about this, no matter what the price, no matter what the obstacles, no matter what the pressures. And I can't tell you how bad it was --it tore families apart, these cases-- if you didn't live through it. It tore communities apart. I don't believe anyone in Massachusetts around this area, 128 or Dedham or whatever, was able to live a life that was not impacted in some way by this case. Okay, these cases, the TurtleBoy case, Karen Read case, et cetera, et cetera. It frustrates me to no end that somehow within that high-profile situation, there were people who started to control the narrative because they had things to hide. And that's why I started this space, because I truly believe that the real secrets lying beneath what was really going on with Michael Proctor and Brian Tully and Kate Peter and the PI, Marty Kraft and Jen McCabe and Yuri Bukhenik and John Fanning and Nick Guarino. What I really believe was going on was that they were worried that the attention brought onto that unit by the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case was gonna spill their secrets about Birchmore. And it led them to double down and commit even more egregious acts in the context of some of this other behavior, like leaking Lindsey Gaetani's cell phone extraction. And that's, again, you wanna talk about the timeline from April 2024 until now, we can do that too. But what I'll tell you is the story ends up being the same. I have graphs, I've looked at the Google Analytics, the data does not lie. Every single time starting in April 2024, that Jen McCabe would become the subject of public attention. It happens at specific, specific discrete moments on the timeline. You see a bump in the attention paid to Lindsey. And there's no doubt in my mind that this unit, when they had Michael Morrissey make that video, when McCabe's friends or family or whatever, when they all got him to make that video, and that didn't work. When Morrissey had to recuse, when things got so bad that they had no other out and the TurtleRiders would not pay attention to anyone but those Karen Read and John O'Keefe witnesses, Tully and his people said, "all right, we're left with no other option. Lindsey Gaetani looks like a good distraction. Let's release her phone." And then that cycle repeated over and over and over and over again. And Lindsey's not the only one who's been subject to this. You wanna talk about what's going on to Estey? Even what's going on with Deanna? With Meredith? What's going on with a lot of these people, right? There were PIs and moles in the internet saying that Lindsey was that and separating that. There were PIs, moles and various people in the end, just sort of people who were trying to either support Karen or support a movement that they could believe in or whatever it was, who got exploited, who got ran by various people for intel purposes to feed information back to their various handlers. And when they became expendable, they got burned. You watch, look at these emails sent to all these people's schools, the mass emails. That can't be a coincidence. Whoever it benefits can't be a coincidence, all right? It's a coordinated tactic. It's designed to put public attention on very specific people when otherwise damaging information gets released. And what have we seen over the past, let's say from April 2024 until now, what have we seen? That over and over and over again, all right? Every time something would happen, there'd be a new distraction. And then as we got through the end of the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case, what did we see? Yes, there were some real, real secrets lying beneath in terms of this case. And I mean it, I mean it with every bone and fiber in my towel body. There were secrets about the Birchmore case. There were secrets about that phone extraction. There were secrets about the inside baseball and the communications between Tully and Kate and Tully and Jen McCabe and Michael Morrissey and Kate and Michael Morrissey and Jen McCabe. And as it all started to come out and as it crescendoed folks over the past few months to the point where Michael Proctor's own attorney was basically making misrepresentations to the court about the existence of 12 years of cell phone records. When he had Kate Peter deleting evidence from Google Drives that were submitted as formal records to grand juries in the Kearney proceedings. When you have a special prosecutor statute that is so broken, it allows a DA rather than complying with the court order to appoint a new special prosecutor to just no-cross cases. So that stuff like what we've been talking about doesn't come out. It's indefensible. But what is the karmic justice here? It is that for whatever reason, Michael Proctor's cell phone records which I truly believe were captured and swept up by the feds during their federal probe of either Farwell or Tully's unit or John O'Keefe's death, whatever it was, exposing a lot of this. It's not just the Rule 14 discovery related to Kate Peter and otherwise and Tully that was turned over in the Aidan Kearney case, the 5,000 pages of material. Initially 4,000 pages of it was mysteriously just blank. It's not just that folks. It's also the, hey, Michael Proctor's cell phone until months ago, August of 2025 was hidden from the public. It was hidden from criminal defendants until someone somewhere must have informed Michael Proctor that a full copy of that cell phone already existed so there was no point in him continuing to hide it. What does this speak to? Well, it speaks to why I started this space today because in light of everything I just laid out from memory. I wanted to see if there was a single person who would be willing to stand up here and defend Michael Proctor's state police unit, Ryan Tully, John Fanning, Yuri Bukhenik, any of them or Kate Peter or Jen McCabe. Not because of their actions necessarily in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case but because of everything I just laid out and the silence would let it speak volumes because how are you possibly going to counter any of that? This is what I'm doing from memory sitting here while trying to challenge people to a debate. That is just a part of the historical record. I cannot put into words how much more expansive in scope some of this story is and it's not any one person's story to tell. Let me also go on a rant about this. I'm getting so frustrated with the possessive approach that some people take to some of this coverage. Do you care about what was done to the most vulnerable? I don't care if you think of Karen as vulnerable, Lindsey is vulnerable, Sandra Birchmore is vulnerable, whoever you think of as vulnerable. Do you care about what happened to them? Do you care about righting the wrongs? Do you care about actually talking about the misconduct or are you trying to make a polemical point in furtherance of some specific platform that either you run or you support? What are you trying to accomplish? And I think a lot of us recently have been forced to have some very difficult moral reckoning. Okay, because a lot of us were tricked. I felt absolutely tricked into supporting Michael Proctor. If I knew, I'm not saying about the merits of the John O'Keefe investigation. If I knew then, back in 2023, 2024, what I know now about what's on that phone and about what that unit was willing to do, I never would have supported them. We supported Lindsey, but I never would have supported that unit. I'm sorry. Nope, never would have done it. And that's why I want to talk about people became very possessive about coverage of this case. Reporters are supposed to fade into the background. It's not supposed to be about us. Yes, maybe you have some skills. The reporter, people are interested. You use those skills to get a following so you can tell a story and get the facts out there, but it's not supposed to be about us. If a reporter is the centerpiece of a story, they have failed. Okay, you just blend in the background. We make sure that the people who are the most harmed, their voices are centered. And then we make sure these predatory vultures, like Kate Peter, are unable to manipulate public narratives to protect entrenched systemic power structures. That's what it's all about. So for me, that's why I get so frustrated. That's why I wanted to do this space because I wanted to make a point that when forced to actually debate on merit, all the propaganda mouthpieces will run from the chance. They're happy to get up and shit talk other people when it's a space they control, and they don't have to address the merits. But you put them in a position where they don't control the space and they're forced to debate on merit and they'll run from it. So in some sense, I made my point. But I also think it's an important exercise in telling this story, in explaining where I'm coming from. I think there are a lot of us that are all coming to the same position, which is it doesn't matter what various camp we may have been in or what not. We're not defined by that. We are just individual humans who have a bunch of views on different cases. And at the end of the day, a lot of us, more so, I think than people realize, actually care about systemic reform. We're not in it to protect Kate Peter or Jen McCabe or Brian Tully or anybody. We're here to hold people to equal standards and ask that the justice system do the same. And I think that's a noble goal. That's something that I can believe in. I wish people would be willing to debate it, though. It frustrates me. It really frustrates me. And, you know, maybe that's the nature of it. Maybe it's that making this point requires showing the litany of evidence, showing the sort of timeline, showing the overlapping concentric social circles, talking about these people, talking about what they did, talking about the implications, talking about where this is going. That's what cuts out the propaganda. To me, everyone is capable of fault. I said this the other day. If there are people out there in your orbit who are telling you that they are incapable of fault, they're a threat to the United States. They're the most dangerous, pernicious force we can imagine. Everyone's capable of fault. And we should look to the people who, in spite of their faults, try to leave the world a better place than what they found when they arrived. I think there are those of us. In spite of absolutely inculcating incredible odds who have somehow managed to get to a point where we've centered the voices, we're not there yet, where we're centering the voices who are actually impacted by all this. And if that happens, mark my words, it will not be because of any large media platforms or networks or anything. It will be in spite of them. It will be in spite of their impact inside dealing in spite of the documentary contracts, in spite of the news networks. It will be because a small group of well-meaning people were willing to band together and say, everything else aside, we can stand behind what's right. It may not be a form of right that we all agree on, but starting from that place, instead of from a place of hatred or otherwise, is a good step. I don't know where this is going. I don't know where it's going. I know that no one will stand up here and defend Kate Peter and Brian Tully, at least in a debate with me where I control the playing field. Can you blame them? But I don't know where this is going. You're on my prediction. As someone who's, I think I've not lived this as much as some other people, but I've lived it a lot. It's been a lot. And I'm never gonna understand the impact that this had on the people who had directly impacted, but it's been a lot on a lot of people. The story has impacted many lives. Even myself, with the perspective I have, kind of sitting back here on my veranda, you can call me Thomas Jefferson Towel. I don't have any hemp though, or do I? Sitting on my veranda, kind of looking forward, right here, all right? I got my public records request back today. I know when a public records request denial is like, oh, we want to stonewall this because there's something there. And I'm getting that vibe related to the contacts between the Norfolk DA's office and the Mass AGO's office between September 25th and October 24th of 2025 related to whether the Norfolk DA reached out to appoint a new special prosecutor in the Lindsey Gaetani and Aidan Kearney cases. But as I'm sitting here on my veranda with my eyes closed, I don't have a veranda. I have a desk. I'm a little towel. As I'm sitting here with my eyes closed, I can see the future materializing, okay? There's only certain roads that this can go down. There are only so many pathways left. There's a reckoning coming, folks. Whether it's a reckoning by way of the Sandra Birchmore cover-up, whether it's a reckoning by way of Michael Proctor's attempt to hide a substantial amount of evidence across a substantial number of criminal cases, whether it's related to Kate Peter's involvement in the handling of evidence in the still remaining Aidan Kearney cases. You can sense the anticipation. You can sense the apprehension and anxiety. And you can sense imminent closure. I'm not saying that is gonna be an easy process. I'm not saying it's gonna be a short process. But I'm saying there's something in the air. It's undeniable. There's little left to defend. There's not a single person, troll or otherwise anonymous account or whatever, who would stand up here today right now and with me and try to defend Kate Peter and Brian Tully. I gave you the chance. There's a time, if I had done this space a year ago, oh, people would have been jumping at the bit. No one will do it. No one. Why? Because we're at the end of the road. What Proctor did was indefensible, not in the Read O'Keefe case, although he should never have used those words about Karen. I'd critique him if he was a private citizen, although obviously I'm protective of women, right? But say what you will about that. I wouldn't use those words in private. That man used them in his capacity as a police officer. Right? Not to mention the other defendants' cases that were impacted by whatever Proctor and Sean Goode and whoever else was on that text chain and whatever else is on that phone is gonna lead to. You can sense it. You can sense the reckoning coming. The question is, back to Watergate in the '70s, there was a member of the House of Representatives during the impeachment hearings in '74. We had a very famous phrase. "What did the President know and when did he know?" Folks, the phrase of our era will be, "What did Michael Morrissey know and when did he know it?" This cannot start and end with justice for any single person involved in this. This is not about any one person at this point. This is about a system of justice in Massachusetts that I suppose was not about justice long before any of us realized it was teetering on the brink of collapse. Annie Dookhan was a warning that we all ignored to our peril. I should have seen it when they somehow got Lindsey that same lawyer that Annie Dookhan had. I should have seen it. It's notโ€”I didn't realize until last week that lawyer George was a handler. Dookhan could create a hugeโ€”it could have created huge exposure for some people in the state police. It's incredible. If somebody painted the picture of the power structure that was at play here. Karen Read, when she said she was afraid of these people, I didn'tโ€”when she said it in the text or something and somebody leaked it. When I first started covering this case, I would not have got it. I don't know what it had been like. What do you mean? They're a state police unit. Like, yeah, they're paramilitary. Like, if you're a criminal, you should fear them, but they're not scary. Right now, after some of the stuff, and I'm talking about half the stuff I've seen as people pull, they horrifying. I think they're cornered, by the way. I don't think there's much they can do. They're getting a little desperate, burning a lot of their agents and their moles. And that's why I sense some kind of reckoning coming. You don't burn deep cover moles. I think Deanna was a mole for Kate for a while. You don't burn somebody like that unless it's almost over. Same thing with Kristy, the way Kristy's been burning everybody. I don't know who the hell she was working for, but whatever she's doing has got to be close to over because you don't burn everybody down unless it's almost over. So why is it almost over, folks? Why? What's coming? Some combination of all of this stuff. And if you want my fundamental prediction, let me give it to you like this. I don't like that it's coming to this, but it's a political question. It's a question of what the narrative is going to be. You don't just, as everyone now knows, you don't just prosecute people because they do things wrong. There's always a decision tree. So what do the feds want out of this? The people who were involved in the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder, whoever was the father of Sandra's unborn child, you know, it's not that Matt Farwell. Well, and then they obviously want this MSP unit. Okay, Michael Proctor, that cell phone, didn't just get cloned. It was a setup. They let Proctor lie to the judge about all those cases and all the cell phone records. And as soon as his lawyer filed the document, they moved on him. He must be under federal investigation. How did Aidan Kearney get those text messages from Jen McCabe to KF and Allie McCabe? Those were removed from Jen McCabe's extraction. The feds cloned her phone too, just like Aidan told Lindsey in those text messages as part of Exhibit O from November 28, 2023. Why did the feds clone Jen McCabe's phone? To see what Jen would withhold in the Rule 14 process. She didn't get banged up on charges federally, so she must have not done anything that bad. Something, however, is going to happen to Proctor, in turn, legally on the federal level. You can sense it. You can sense it. They're going to indict him. But for what? But then it leaves Tully, which was what this whole stream is about. We have the email from Tully. Forget about whether it's normal procedure for Tully to instruct Proctor to look into all the defense witnesses. We now know that Proctor was not running that case. It was Tully. It was all Brian Tully. What was the meme that I put up today? I really like this one. It says, the nine most terrifying words in the English language are, "I'm Brian Tully and I'm here to help." Attributed to Ronald Reagan. My point is though, it was Brian Tully. Look at it. Kate was his little, I don't know, what do we want to call, how can we say this nicely? You know, I'm trying to rise above and encourage more reasonable, respectful discourse. So Kate was his little, this is so hard. All right, let me, let me say a prayer here. Come on, now you can do this. Okay. So, there are so many words I want to use. Kate was his little assistant. I know, I know. You were expecting something wonderful. Every single thing that I was going to say there was going to be cruel, so I'm sorry. Kate was his little assistant, his little PI there. And then, I'm going to turn it around, nightmare PI Moms, version 2, Kate Peter, Jen McCabe, let's go down the seaport. Kate Peter was his little PI until he was quarterbacking all this. I think it was Morrissey who was even cut out of the loop a little bit, although I'm not sure he wasn't more involved than I'm willing to say right now. And you can see why it happened. Because when Morrissey recused in October of 2023 from the Aidan Kearney cases, and what became the Aidan Kearney and Karen Read investigations that are still ongoing, he didn't really recuse. He just had Tully and Kate running it. I started to wonder if Jen McCabe was like a PI for a case she was a witness on. I'm really starting to wonder that.
27:21

"I have graphs, I've looked at the Google Analytics, the data does not lie. Every single time, starting in April 2024, that Jen McCabe would become the subject of public attention --It happens at specific discrete moments on the timeline-- you see a bump in the attention paid to Lindsey Gaetani." "And there's no doubt in my mind that Brian Tully's MSP unit --when they had Michael Morrissey make that video, when McCabe's friends or family or whatever, when they all got him to make that video, and that didn't work, and when Morrissey had to recuse, when things got so bad that they had no other out, and the TurtleRiders would not pay attention to anyone but those Karen Read and John O'Keefe witnesses-- Tully, Kate Peter and their people said, "all right, we're left with no other option. Lindsey Gaetani looks like a good distraction. Let's release her phone." And then that cycle repeated over and over and over and over again. And Lindsey's not the only one who's been subject to this. You wanna talk about what's going on to Estey? Even what's going on with Deanna? With Meredith?" TRANSCRIPT: And people wonder why I get so passionate about this. This is nothing I haven't talked about before, but you are not gonna tell me, me, of all people --I'm not gonna speak for Lindsey-- but you are not gonna tell me that the release of Lindsey Gaetani's cell phone extraction did not have serious, serious ramifications. Like, I can't even conceptualize what the impact was on Lindsey and her family's life. I don't think my life was ever the same again after April of 2024. As traumatized as I was from that December 2023 court hearing, what happened in April of 2024 was the worst thing that I have ever seen happen to any human being in my entire life. [Speaking to chat] Oh, hi Lindsey, how are you? I've just never seen anything that horrific, the leak of that cell phone extraction, the impact that it had, the fact that no one even understood how severe it was because people were so distracted by the polemics of it. People were so "excited" to be able to smear Lindsey and the distraction was so powerful that no one asked, one, why did this happen? Or two, what was the impact? And that's what really got me so passionate and furious about this. It wasn't an issue of substantive guilt or innocence about anyone. It was that I was seeing the same exact stuff happen in this situation to people without political connections that I saw happen to the staff of the CCC when really powerful men started getting very, very, very close to each other in positions of power and then when they would do bad things to women, they would just talk to each other. One guy would run the HR department, the other guy would run the executive director position, and somebody else would have a connection to the appointing authority. And so any complaint would just be what's called "caught and killed." And I said, there is no way that this is gonna happen again. When it was happening in the CCC, it was an administrative regulatory agency. At least there was some sort of semblance of check and balance. It wasn't egregious because everyone had a lot of influence, even the people who were staffers. This situation, we had state police officers, people who, if you were listening to the just the narrative of the people who were supporting the Justice for John O'Keefe movement, you would think that Michael Proctor's infallible. You would think Brian Tully's infallible. You would think Kate Peter's infallible, which means incapable of fault. That's nonsense. I'm telling you right now, that's nonsense, and that's why it was so easy for this stuff to manifest. And that's why I became so personally concerned. Forget about what developed from April to April of 2024 until now. That's why I was so upset because I watched what happened from December of 2023 through to April of 2024. And that enough was so egregious, so wrong, such an abuse of trust, such an abuse of the justice system that I said, there is no way that I can just stand by and be apathetic about this, no matter what the price, no matter what the obstacles, no matter what the pressures. And I can't tell you how bad it was --it tore families apart, these cases-- if you didn't live through it. It tore communities apart. I don't believe anyone in Massachusetts around this area, 128 or Dedham or whatever, was able to live a life that was not impacted in some way by this case. Okay, these cases, the TurtleBoy case, Karen Read case, et cetera, et cetera. It frustrates me to no end that somehow within that high-profile situation, there were people who started to control the narrative because they had things to hide. And that's why I started this space, because I truly believe that the real secrets lying beneath what was really going on with Michael Proctor and Brian Tully and Kate Peter and the PI, Marty Kraft and Jen McCabe and Yuri Bukhenik and John Fanning and Nick Guarino. What I really believe was going on was that they were worried that the attention brought onto that unit by the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case was gonna spill their secrets about Birchmore. And it led them to double down and commit even more egregious acts in the context of some of this other behavior, like leaking Lindsey Gaetani's cell phone extraction. And that's, again, you wanna talk about the timeline from April 2024 until now, we can do that too. But what I'll tell you is the story ends up being the same. I have graphs, I've looked at the Google Analytics, the data does not lie. Every single time starting in April 2024, that Jen McCabe would become the subject of public attention. It happens at specific, specific discrete moments on the timeline. You see a bump in the attention paid to Lindsey. And there's no doubt in my mind that this unit, when they had Michael Morrissey make that video, when McCabe's friends or family or whatever, when they all got him to make that video, and that didn't work. When Morrissey had to recuse, when things got so bad that they had no other out and the TurtleRiders would not pay attention to anyone but those Karen Read and John O'Keefe witnesses, Tully and his people said, "all right, we're left with no other option. Lindsey Gaetani looks like a good distraction. Let's release her phone." And then that cycle repeated over and over and over and over again. And Lindsey's not the only one who's been subject to this. You wanna talk about what's going on to Estey? Even what's going on with Deanna? With Meredith? What's going on with a lot of these people, right? There were PIs and moles in the internet saying that Lindsey was that and separating that. There were PIs, moles and various people in the end, just sort of people who were trying to either support Karen or support a movement that they could believe in or whatever it was, who got exploited, who got ran by various people for intel purposes to feed information back to their various handlers. And when they became expendable, they got burned. You watch, look at these emails sent to all these people's schools, the mass emails. That can't be a coincidence. Whoever it benefits can't be a coincidence, all right? It's a coordinated tactic. It's designed to put public attention on very specific people when otherwise damaging information gets released. And what have we seen over the past, let's say from April 2024 until now, what have we seen? That over and over and over again, all right? Every time something would happen, there'd be a new distraction. And then as we got through the end of the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case, what did we see? Yes, there were some real, real secrets lying beneath in terms of this case. And I mean it, I mean it with every bone and fiber in my towel body. There were secrets about the Birchmore case. There were secrets about that phone extraction. There were secrets about the inside baseball and the communications between Tully and Kate and Tully and Jen McCabe and Michael Morrissey and Kate and Michael Morrissey and Jen McCabe. And as it all started to come out and as it crescendoed folks over the past few months to the point where Michael Proctor's own attorney was basically making misrepresentations to the court about the existence of 12 years of cell phone records. When he had Kate Peter deleting evidence from Google Drives that were submitted as formal records to grand juries in the Kearney proceedings. When you have a special prosecutor statute that is so broken, it allows a DA rather than complying with the court order to appoint a new special prosecutor to just no-cross cases. So that stuff like what we've been talking about doesn't come out. It's indefensible. But what is the karmic justice here? It is that for whatever reason, Michael Proctor's cell phone records which I truly believe were captured and swept up by the feds during their federal probe of either Farwell or Tully's unit or John O'Keefe's death, whatever it was, exposing a lot of this. It's not just the Rule 14 discovery related to Kate Peter and otherwise and Tully that was turned over in the Aidan Kearney case, the 5,000 pages of material. Initially 4,000 pages of it was mysteriously just blank. It's not just that folks. It's also the, hey, Michael Proctor's cell phone until months ago, August of 2025 was hidden from the public. It was hidden from criminal defendants until someone somewhere must have informed Michael Proctor that a full copy of that cell phone already existed so there was no point in him continuing to hide it. What does this speak to? Well, it speaks to why I started this space today because in light of everything I just laid out from memory. I wanted to see if there was a single person who would be willing to stand up here and defend Michael Proctor's state police unit, Ryan Tully, John Fanning, Yuri Bukhenik, any of them or Kate Peter or Jen McCabe. Not because of their actions necessarily in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case but because of everything I just laid out and the silence would let it speak volumes because how are you possibly going to counter any of that? This is what I'm doing from memory sitting here while trying to challenge people to a debate. That is just a part of the historical record. I cannot put into words how much more expansive in scope some of this story is and it's not any one person's story to tell. Let me also go on a rant about this. I'm getting so frustrated with the possessive approach that some people take to some of this coverage. Do you care about what was done to the most vulnerable? I don't care if you think of Karen as vulnerable, Lindsey is vulnerable, Sandra Birchmore is vulnerable, whoever you think of as vulnerable. Do you care about what happened to them? Do you care about righting the wrongs? Do you care about actually talking about the misconduct or are you trying to make a polemical point in furtherance of some specific platform that either you run or you support? What are you trying to accomplish? And I think a lot of us recently have been forced to have some very difficult moral reckoning. Okay, because a lot of us were tricked. I felt absolutely tricked into supporting Michael Proctor. If I knew, I'm not saying about the merits of the John O'Keefe investigation. If I knew then, back in 2023, 2024, what I know now about what's on that phone and about what that unit was willing to do, I never would have supported them. We supported Lindsey, but I never would have supported that unit. I'm sorry. Nope, never would have done it. And that's why I want to talk about people became very possessive about coverage of this case. Reporters are supposed to fade into the background. It's not supposed to be about us. Yes, maybe you have some skills. The reporter, people are interested. You use those skills to get a following so you can tell a story and get the facts out there, but it's not supposed to be about us. If a reporter is the centerpiece of a story, they have failed. Okay, you just blend in the background. We make sure that the people who are the most harmed, their voices are centered. And then we make sure these predatory vultures, like Kate Peter, are unable to manipulate public narratives to protect entrenched systemic power structures. That's what it's all about. So for me, that's why I get so frustrated. That's why I wanted to do this space because I wanted to make a point that when forced to actually debate on merit, all the propaganda mouthpieces will run from the chance. They're happy to get up and shit talk other people when it's a space they control, and they don't have to address the merits. But you put them in a position where they don't control the space and they're forced to debate on merit and they'll run from it. So in some sense, I made my point. But I also think it's an important exercise in telling this story, in explaining where I'm coming from. I think there are a lot of us that are all coming to the same position, which is it doesn't matter what various camp we may have been in or what not. We're not defined by that. We are just individual humans who have a bunch of views on different cases. And at the end of the day, a lot of us, more so, I think than people realize, actually care about systemic reform. We're not in it to protect Kate Peter or Jen McCabe or Brian Tully or anybody. We're here to hold people to equal standards and ask that the justice system do the same. And I think that's a noble goal. That's something that I can believe in. I wish people would be willing to debate it, though. It frustrates me. It really frustrates me. And, you know, maybe that's the nature of it. Maybe it's that making this point requires showing the litany of evidence, showing the sort of timeline, showing the overlapping concentric social circles, talking about these people, talking about what they did, talking about the implications, talking about where this is going. That's what cuts out the propaganda. To me, everyone is capable of fault. I said this the other day. If there are people out there in your orbit who are telling you that they are incapable of fault, they're a threat to the United States. They're the most dangerous, pernicious force we can imagine. Everyone's capable of fault. And we should look to the people who, in spite of their faults, try to leave the world a better place than what they found when they arrived. I think there are those of us. In spite of absolutely inculcating incredible odds who have somehow managed to get to a point where we've centered the voices, we're not there yet, where we're centering the voices who are actually impacted by all this. And if that happens, mark my words, it will not be because of any large media platforms or networks or anything. It will be in spite of them. It will be in spite of their impact inside dealing in spite of the documentary contracts, in spite of the news networks. It will be because a small group of well-meaning people were willing to band together and say, everything else aside, we can stand behind what's right. It may not be a form of right that we all agree on, but starting from that place, instead of from a place of hatred or otherwise, is a good step. I don't know where this is going. I don't know where it's going. I know that no one will stand up here and defend Kate Peter and Brian Tully, at least in a debate with me where I control the playing field. Can you blame them? But I don't know where this is going. You're on my prediction. As someone who's, I think I've not lived this as much as some other people, but I've lived it a lot. It's been a lot. And I'm never gonna understand the impact that this had on the people who had directly impacted, but it's been a lot on a lot of people. The story has impacted many lives. Even myself, with the perspective I have, kind of sitting back here on my veranda, you can call me Thomas Jefferson Towel. I don't have any hemp though, or do I? Sitting on my veranda, kind of looking forward, right here, all right? I got my public records request back today. I know when a public records request denial is like, oh, we want to stonewall this because there's something there. And I'm getting that vibe related to the contacts between the Norfolk DA's office and the Mass AGO's office between September 25th and October 24th of 2025 related to whether the Norfolk DA reached out to appoint a new special prosecutor in the Lindsey Gaetani and Aidan Kearney cases. But as I'm sitting here on my veranda with my eyes closed, I don't have a veranda. I have a desk. I'm a little towel. As I'm sitting here with my eyes closed, I can see the future materializing, okay? There's only certain roads that this can go down. There are only so many pathways left. There's a reckoning coming, folks. Whether it's a reckoning by way of the Sandra Birchmore cover-up, whether it's a reckoning by way of Michael Proctor's attempt to hide a substantial amount of evidence across a substantial number of criminal cases, whether it's related to Kate Peter's involvement in the handling of evidence in the still remaining Aidan Kearney cases. You can sense the anticipation. You can sense the apprehension and anxiety. And you can sense imminent closure. I'm not saying that is gonna be an easy process. I'm not saying it's gonna be a short process. But I'm saying there's something in the air. It's undeniable. There's little left to defend. There's not a single person, troll or otherwise anonymous account or whatever, who would stand up here today right now and with me and try to defend Kate Peter and Brian Tully. I gave you the chance. There's a time, if I had done this space a year ago, oh, people would have been jumping at the bit. No one will do it. No one. Why? Because we're at the end of the road. What Proctor did was indefensible, not in the Read O'Keefe case, although he should never have used those words about Karen. I'd critique him if he was a private citizen, although obviously I'm protective of women, right? But say what you will about that. I wouldn't use those words in private. That man used them in his capacity as a police officer. Right? Not to mention the other defendants' cases that were impacted by whatever Proctor and Sean Goode and whoever else was on that text chain and whatever else is on that phone is gonna lead to. You can sense it. You can sense the reckoning coming. The question is, back to Watergate in the '70s, there was a member of the House of Representatives during the impeachment hearings in '74. We had a very famous phrase. "What did the President know and when did he know?" Folks, the phrase of our era will be, "What did Michael Morrissey know and when did he know it?" This cannot start and end with justice for any single person involved in this. This is not about any one person at this point. This is about a system of justice in Massachusetts that I suppose was not about justice long before any of us realized it was teetering on the brink of collapse. Annie Dookhan was a warning that we all ignored to our peril. I should have seen it when they somehow got Lindsey that same lawyer that Annie Dookhan had. I should have seen it. It's notโ€”I didn't realize until last week that lawyer George was a handler. Dookhan could create a hugeโ€”it could have created huge exposure for some people in the state police. It's incredible. If somebody painted the picture of the power structure that was at play here. Karen Read, when she said she was afraid of these people, I didn'tโ€”when she said it in the text or something and somebody leaked it. When I first started covering this case, I would not have got it. I don't know what it had been like. What do you mean? They're a state police unit. Like, yeah, they're paramilitary. Like, if you're a criminal, you should fear them, but they're not scary. Right now, after some of the stuff, and I'm talking about half the stuff I've seen as people pull, they horrifying. I think they're cornered, by the way. I don't think there's much they can do. They're getting a little desperate, burning a lot of their agents and their moles. And that's why I sense some kind of reckoning coming. You don't burn deep cover moles. I think Deanna was a mole for Kate for a while. You don't burn somebody like that unless it's almost over. Same thing with Kristy, the way Kristy's been burning everybody. I don't know who the hell she was working for, but whatever she's doing has got to be close to over because you don't burn everybody down unless it's almost over. So why is it almost over, folks? Why? What's coming? Some combination of all of this stuff. And if you want my fundamental prediction, let me give it to you like this. I don't like that it's coming to this, but it's a political question. It's a question of what the narrative is going to be. You don't just, as everyone now knows, you don't just prosecute people because they do things wrong. There's always a decision tree. So what do the feds want out of this? The people who were involved in the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder, whoever was the father of Sandra's unborn child, you know, it's not that Matt Farwell. Well, and then they obviously want this MSP unit. Okay, Michael Proctor, that cell phone, didn't just get cloned. It was a setup. They let Proctor lie to the judge about all those cases and all the cell phone records. And as soon as his lawyer filed the document, they moved on him. He must be under federal investigation. How did Aidan Kearney get those text messages from Jen McCabe to KF and Allie McCabe? Those were removed from Jen McCabe's extraction. The feds cloned her phone too, just like Aidan told Lindsey in those text messages as part of Exhibit O from November 28, 2023. Why did the feds clone Jen McCabe's phone? To see what Jen would withhold in the Rule 14 process. She didn't get banged up on charges federally, so she must have not done anything that bad. Something, however, is going to happen to Proctor, in turn, legally on the federal level. You can sense it. You can sense it. They're going to indict him. But for what? But then it leaves Tully, which was what this whole stream is about. We have the email from Tully. Forget about whether it's normal procedure for Tully to instruct Proctor to look into all the defense witnesses. We now know that Proctor was not running that case. It was Tully. It was all Brian Tully. What was the meme that I put up today? I really like this one. It says, the nine most terrifying words in the English language are, "I'm Brian Tully and I'm here to help." Attributed to Ronald Reagan. My point is though, it was Brian Tully. Look at it. Kate was his little, I don't know, what do we want to call, how can we say this nicely? You know, I'm trying to rise above and encourage more reasonable, respectful discourse. So Kate was his little, this is so hard. All right, let me, let me say a prayer here. Come on, now you can do this. Okay. So, there are so many words I want to use. Kate was his little assistant. I know, I know. You were expecting something wonderful. Every single thing that I was going to say there was going to be cruel, so I'm sorry. Kate was his little assistant, his little PI there. And then, I'm going to turn it around, nightmare PI Moms, version 2, Kate Peter, Jen McCabe, let's go down the seaport. Kate Peter was his little PI until he was quarterbacking all this. I think it was Morrissey who was even cut out of the loop a little bit, although I'm not sure he wasn't more involved than I'm willing to say right now. And you can see why it happened. Because when Morrissey recused in October of 2023 from the Aidan Kearney cases, and what became the Aidan Kearney and Karen Read investigations that are still ongoing, he didn't really recuse. He just had Tully and Kate running it. I started to wonder if Jen McCabe was like a PI for a case she was a witness on. I'm really starting to wonder that.

Grant Smith Ellis

17,939 views โ€ข 9 months ago

The Altar for sacrificing the red heifers in Jerusalem has just been built, and they are saying the ceremony may take place any day as I've been warning about for many years now. But what exactly does this all mean? Let's talk about how it relates to biblical prophecy and how even most professing Christians are missing the deeper biblical narrative unfolding beyond what's just on the surface. The Red Heifer prophecy from the Book of Numbers involves a unique ritual for purification in Jewish tradition. A completely red heifer is sacrificed and burned, and its ashes are mixed with water to create a "water of cleansing" for those who've touched a corpse, which symbolizes purification from death's impurity. This commandment is linked to Messianic hopes and the rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem. Jews are awaiting a Messiah who aligns with specific prophecies, such as bringing peace to the Middle East and the world through his political power. They believe Jesus didn't fulfill these expectations during his first coming, but we as Christians hold that He will achieve this in his Second Coming as He told the apostles and explained in Revelation 19. The Red Heifer ritual taking place now is seen as part of their preparations for this future era. We as Christians, however, obviously believe Jesus is the Messiah and see His rejection as setting the stage for the rise of their false messiah. John 5, particularly verses 43-47, where Jesus says, "I have come in my Father's name, and you do not accept me; but if someone else comes in his own name, you will accept him," The New Testament, especially the Gospels, tells a story of how Jewish leaders and many people didn't recognize Jesus as the Messiah, symbolizing a common human struggle to see divine truth. This theme is captured in John 1:11, where despite Jesus coming to His own, He was not accepted. This led to the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD, which was divine judgment for this rejection. Here's where people really need to pay attention as to not be deceived by this deception as most people will: I want people to keep in mind that God used rebellious, pagan nations such as Rome and Assyria as instruments of wrath against Jerusalem for her harlotry, illustrating His supreme sovereignty and His unique capability to employ the wicked to enact judgment on the wicked. What we are about to witness is a repeat of the judgement cycles on Israel. In the book of Amos, the prophet warns Israel of a coming "Day of the Lord" where they will face punishment for their disobedience (Amos 5:18-20). Similarly, the prophet Zephaniah uses the term to describe a day of wrath and distress that will come upon Jerusalem (Zephaniah 1:14-18). Thatโ€™s what brought the day of the Lord, was their harlotry, God delivered Israel into the hands of their enemies because she played the harlot. And so it will be at the end, when the Great day of the Lord comes in the final days and the Lord God delivers Jerusalem, the harlot, into the hands of her enemies, which will ultimately be the beast and his kings as described in Revelation 17:16. If we interpret the Bible with the Bible, as we should, you will see that the harlot of Babylon, can only be Jerusalem. Letโ€™s first look at Revelation 11:8 which speaks of the death of the two witnesses. โ€œAnd their dead bodies shall lie in the street of THE GREAT CITY, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also OUR LORD WAS CRUCIFIED.โ€ So obviously โ€œthat great cityโ€ is also where Our Lord was crucified. Now keep in mind the phrase โ€˜the great city.โ€™ Letโ€™s look at Revelation 14:8, โ€œAnd there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication.โ€ In Revelation 17:18 we read, โ€œAnd the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.โ€ So we can see in when speaking about Babylon or the harlot, the same phrase, โ€˜the great cityโ€™ is also used. In chapter 11 โ€˜the great cityโ€™ is identified as Jerusalem, and the great city is also used in chapters 14 and 17 when speaking of Babylon. If we let the Bible interpret the Bible, we canโ€™t come to any other conclusion than that the harlot of Babylon is Jerusalem. Which also makes because Jerusalem is the only city that God would call a harlot, because itโ€™s the only city that God ever made a Holy Covenant with. Itโ€™s the only city that He tried to make His bride. The martial analogy is used throughout scripture both with Jerusalem and Israel as well as the general body of believers who become part of Israel spiritually. The body of believers, both Jew and gentile make up Godโ€™s bride. And so thereโ€™s really no reason for God to call a city a harlot unless that city or the people of it betrayed a holy covenant with God. And thereโ€™s only one nation God made a covenant with, which is Jerusalem and the nation of Israel. Harlotry is not a reference to mere wicked acts, itโ€™s specifically a reference to betrayal. I think itโ€™s pretty clear that Jerusalem is that great city, Babylon the harlot, the unfaithful wife who has continually betrayed her marriage with God. And of course Jerusalem and Israel are referred to a harlot in Isaiah 1:21, Jer 2;20, 3:1-11, Ez. 16;1-43, and Gal. 4:25. Revelation 17:7 shows the beast initially supporting the harlot, symbolizing their alliance in the beginning. The beast's backing is key for the harlot's power, indicating they start off in a partnership where they rely on each other. The partnership between Jerusalem (Mystery Babylon) and the beast kicks off with a phase of mutual support, where the beast's political might boosts Jerusalem's position. This alliance, rooted in common goals, political gain, or perhaps mutual respect, sees Jerusalem siding with the beast, likely aiming to ensure a prominent and secure spot on the world stage. The turning point comes as an unholy, multi-faith gentile alliance, led by the beast, becomes "awakened" to the dark agenda of Mystery Babylon (the Zionist, Talmudic-led New World Order). This realization or awakening leads them to view Jerusalem not as a city to be protected or championed but as the source of crimes against humanity by Mystery Babylon, Jerusalem. This shift reflects a broader disillusionment with the initial alliance, as the true nature and consequences of Jerusalem's actions and influence become apparent to the beast and his coalition. Driven by their realization, the beast and its allies turn against Jerusalem, fulfilling Revelation 17:16's prophecy. Their initial partnership ends dramatically as they destroy the harlot, judging Jerusalem for her crimes and dark agendas. This act is depicted as complete and ruthless, demonstrating the intensity of the betrayal and the beast's deep hostility after the alliance dissolves. After destroying Jerusalem (Mystery Babylon), the beast and its allies bring about a short-lived period of false peace. This time, free from the harlot's influence, feels like a victory and freedom from her tyrannical agenda. However, this peace is not genuine but a poor imitation of God's true kingdom. It marks the height of the beast's power, where his rule goes unopposed. But this phase is temporary, serving as a calm before the storm of ultimate divine judgment and intervention. And that's exactly why, towards the end of the tribulation, after the harlot is taken down, they'll start declaring "peace and safety." (1 Thessalonians 5:3) They'll be under the impression that Satan's empire has been toppled and that the Millennium (1,000 Years of peace) is about to kick off. But that's when they're going to be hit with a harsh reality check as Christ makes His entrance, coming in the clouds to crash their party, which is the sudden destruction talked about in 1 Thess 5:3. And I believe that's exactly what Christians are unknowingly getting involved in when they only focus on the great reset and the whole tyrannical leftist/communist/zionist NWO agenda. They do not even realize the full scope of what they're gradually aligning themselves with. People who hyper-fixate on the obvious dark side believe they're revealing the impending kingdom of the beast, but in reality, they're actually uncovering the harlot, the very adversary that the beast is destined to destroy as told in Revelation 17:16. That explains why many people, including dominionist proponents of the NAR and seven-mountain mandate, like Lance Wallnau from Bethel Church, often emphasize the idea of "invading Babylon", which he wrote a book about. Because, in essence, what they're building isn't the millennial kingdom of Christ but rather a counterfeit version of it by defeating Babylon and inadvertently ushering in the beast. The world's current turmoil: moral decline, societal upheaval, and the emergence of charismatic leaders promising restoration, isn't new, it's a repeat of history and biblical narratives. This scenario often splits into two camps: those pushing boundaries towards blatant immorality and those advocating for a return to moral and national pride, albeit sometimes through questionable means. Consider Jezebel's story as a metaphor for today's extreme immorality, countered by a force that, while claiming to champion morality, mistakenly aligns with spiritual adversaries in a false unity known as ecumenism. Jehu's story in the Old Testament is a fascinating case of the difference between outward actions and inner spiritual commitment. Externally, Jehu appeared passionate about serving God, notably in his actions against Ahab's family, Jezebel and Baal worship, which might seem like true righteousness. Yet, Jehu's heart wasn't completely devoted to God. His main issue was his selective enthusiasm: he was eager to get rid of God's foes but failed to address the need for his own spiritual purification and that of Israel. Jehu's neglect becomes clear with his acceptance of the golden calf idols in Dan and Bethel. These idols, created by Jeroboam to keep Israelites from worshiping in Jerusalem, were a major departure from genuine worship. Jehu's decision to let these idols stay showed a compromised version of Judaismโ€”one that appeared to respect God on the surface but was fundamentally flawed. The Antichrist reflects a larger, more deceptive version of Jehu's conflict. He will perform actions that look good, like destroying foreign idols and transparently dark agendas, seeming to follow God's will. Yet, his critical failure, akin to Jehu's, will be in what he neglects. He'll ignore the modern-day "golden calves" โ€” subtler forms of idolatry that are not as easy to spot or discern. These may not be as obvious as the overt darkness of Mystery Babylon but are just as offensive to God. This misleading form of Christianity, similar to Jehu's insincere Judaism, will display an outward show of being righteous by targeting external foes while neglecting the deep, inner changes true faith demands, such as the need for sincere repentance and humbling of the heart. It serves as a powerful call for ongoing self-reflection and realignment with God's will, demonstrating that real righteousness involves not just fighting visible wrongs but also facing and rejecting the subtler forms of idolatry that can seep into our lives without us realizing it. This eerily mirrors the Weimar Republic, a period before Nazi Germany, where a struggle between societal depravity and a flawed sense of virtue set the stage for disaster. Jehu's and Jezebel's biblical showdown, where Jehu becomes a vessel of judgment against Jezebel, parallels the rise of figures like Hitler. Hitler, driven by a distorted zeal, identified Judah as the enemy, which history is poised to repeat through unveiling the dark agendas of Mystery Babylon, Jerusalem. Today, we see a cultural war marked by extreme stances on issues like LGBT rights, violence, racism, and especially abortion, which are akin to Jezebel's overt wickedness. The real threat lies not just in the cultural shift towards immorality but in the response it provokesโ€”an ecumenical movement that, though aimed at combating immorality, risks aligning with deceit, setting the stage for the rise of the Antichrist kingdom, a counterfeit kingdom of God as imagined by humanity through defeating Mystery Babylon, which will be misperceived as Satan's ultimate empire. This figure will likely emerge, claiming to oppose these immoral forces, only to lead people into a new and subtler form of idolatry, much like Jehu's false zeal. There's something about standing up against these glaringly obvious social wrongs and oppressive forces that really inflates one's ego. The more time you spend hyper-focused on obvious evils and tyranny the more you'll start to feel not so evil, just like the Pharisee in Luke 18. He convinced himself he was righteous simply because he wasn't as bad as "those other people." Another lesson from history, like King Ahaz's unholy alliance with Assyria, warns us against forming alliances with spiritual enemies for worldly security against physical threats that stem from fearing the world, rather than fearing the Lord. At its heart, the Red Heifer ceremony is more than just a ritual; it's a chapter in the bigger story of faith and prophecy that's been unfolding throughout human history. It's a sign to look inward, to really think about where we stand and what we believe in. It's a pivotal moment that challenges us to choose: Do we follow the path of patience, perseverance, repentance and not following the world's desire for peace and safety as Jesus says, or do we get lost chasing shadows? As we make our way through these stormy times, let's hold tight to the promise of a redemption that goes beyond the chaos surrounding us. Please pray on all of this, my brothers and sisters. May God bless each and every one of you.
4:35

The Altar for sacrificing the red heifers in Jerusalem has just been built, and they are saying the ceremony may take place any day as I've been warning about for many years now. But what exactly does this all mean? Let's talk about how it relates to biblical prophecy and how even most professing Christians are missing the deeper biblical narrative unfolding beyond what's just on the surface. The Red Heifer prophecy from the Book of Numbers involves a unique ritual for purification in Jewish tradition. A completely red heifer is sacrificed and burned, and its ashes are mixed with water to create a "water of cleansing" for those who've touched a corpse, which symbolizes purification from death's impurity. This commandment is linked to Messianic hopes and the rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem. Jews are awaiting a Messiah who aligns with specific prophecies, such as bringing peace to the Middle East and the world through his political power. They believe Jesus didn't fulfill these expectations during his first coming, but we as Christians hold that He will achieve this in his Second Coming as He told the apostles and explained in Revelation 19. The Red Heifer ritual taking place now is seen as part of their preparations for this future era. We as Christians, however, obviously believe Jesus is the Messiah and see His rejection as setting the stage for the rise of their false messiah. John 5, particularly verses 43-47, where Jesus says, "I have come in my Father's name, and you do not accept me; but if someone else comes in his own name, you will accept him," The New Testament, especially the Gospels, tells a story of how Jewish leaders and many people didn't recognize Jesus as the Messiah, symbolizing a common human struggle to see divine truth. This theme is captured in John 1:11, where despite Jesus coming to His own, He was not accepted. This led to the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD, which was divine judgment for this rejection. Here's where people really need to pay attention as to not be deceived by this deception as most people will: I want people to keep in mind that God used rebellious, pagan nations such as Rome and Assyria as instruments of wrath against Jerusalem for her harlotry, illustrating His supreme sovereignty and His unique capability to employ the wicked to enact judgment on the wicked. What we are about to witness is a repeat of the judgement cycles on Israel. In the book of Amos, the prophet warns Israel of a coming "Day of the Lord" where they will face punishment for their disobedience (Amos 5:18-20). Similarly, the prophet Zephaniah uses the term to describe a day of wrath and distress that will come upon Jerusalem (Zephaniah 1:14-18). Thatโ€™s what brought the day of the Lord, was their harlotry, God delivered Israel into the hands of their enemies because she played the harlot. And so it will be at the end, when the Great day of the Lord comes in the final days and the Lord God delivers Jerusalem, the harlot, into the hands of her enemies, which will ultimately be the beast and his kings as described in Revelation 17:16. If we interpret the Bible with the Bible, as we should, you will see that the harlot of Babylon, can only be Jerusalem. Letโ€™s first look at Revelation 11:8 which speaks of the death of the two witnesses. โ€œAnd their dead bodies shall lie in the street of THE GREAT CITY, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also OUR LORD WAS CRUCIFIED.โ€ So obviously โ€œthat great cityโ€ is also where Our Lord was crucified. Now keep in mind the phrase โ€˜the great city.โ€™ Letโ€™s look at Revelation 14:8, โ€œAnd there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication.โ€ In Revelation 17:18 we read, โ€œAnd the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.โ€ So we can see in when speaking about Babylon or the harlot, the same phrase, โ€˜the great cityโ€™ is also used. In chapter 11 โ€˜the great cityโ€™ is identified as Jerusalem, and the great city is also used in chapters 14 and 17 when speaking of Babylon. If we let the Bible interpret the Bible, we canโ€™t come to any other conclusion than that the harlot of Babylon is Jerusalem. Which also makes because Jerusalem is the only city that God would call a harlot, because itโ€™s the only city that God ever made a Holy Covenant with. Itโ€™s the only city that He tried to make His bride. The martial analogy is used throughout scripture both with Jerusalem and Israel as well as the general body of believers who become part of Israel spiritually. The body of believers, both Jew and gentile make up Godโ€™s bride. And so thereโ€™s really no reason for God to call a city a harlot unless that city or the people of it betrayed a holy covenant with God. And thereโ€™s only one nation God made a covenant with, which is Jerusalem and the nation of Israel. Harlotry is not a reference to mere wicked acts, itโ€™s specifically a reference to betrayal. I think itโ€™s pretty clear that Jerusalem is that great city, Babylon the harlot, the unfaithful wife who has continually betrayed her marriage with God. And of course Jerusalem and Israel are referred to a harlot in Isaiah 1:21, Jer 2;20, 3:1-11, Ez. 16;1-43, and Gal. 4:25. Revelation 17:7 shows the beast initially supporting the harlot, symbolizing their alliance in the beginning. The beast's backing is key for the harlot's power, indicating they start off in a partnership where they rely on each other. The partnership between Jerusalem (Mystery Babylon) and the beast kicks off with a phase of mutual support, where the beast's political might boosts Jerusalem's position. This alliance, rooted in common goals, political gain, or perhaps mutual respect, sees Jerusalem siding with the beast, likely aiming to ensure a prominent and secure spot on the world stage. The turning point comes as an unholy, multi-faith gentile alliance, led by the beast, becomes "awakened" to the dark agenda of Mystery Babylon (the Zionist, Talmudic-led New World Order). This realization or awakening leads them to view Jerusalem not as a city to be protected or championed but as the source of crimes against humanity by Mystery Babylon, Jerusalem. This shift reflects a broader disillusionment with the initial alliance, as the true nature and consequences of Jerusalem's actions and influence become apparent to the beast and his coalition. Driven by their realization, the beast and its allies turn against Jerusalem, fulfilling Revelation 17:16's prophecy. Their initial partnership ends dramatically as they destroy the harlot, judging Jerusalem for her crimes and dark agendas. This act is depicted as complete and ruthless, demonstrating the intensity of the betrayal and the beast's deep hostility after the alliance dissolves. After destroying Jerusalem (Mystery Babylon), the beast and its allies bring about a short-lived period of false peace. This time, free from the harlot's influence, feels like a victory and freedom from her tyrannical agenda. However, this peace is not genuine but a poor imitation of God's true kingdom. It marks the height of the beast's power, where his rule goes unopposed. But this phase is temporary, serving as a calm before the storm of ultimate divine judgment and intervention. And that's exactly why, towards the end of the tribulation, after the harlot is taken down, they'll start declaring "peace and safety." (1 Thessalonians 5:3) They'll be under the impression that Satan's empire has been toppled and that the Millennium (1,000 Years of peace) is about to kick off. But that's when they're going to be hit with a harsh reality check as Christ makes His entrance, coming in the clouds to crash their party, which is the sudden destruction talked about in 1 Thess 5:3. And I believe that's exactly what Christians are unknowingly getting involved in when they only focus on the great reset and the whole tyrannical leftist/communist/zionist NWO agenda. They do not even realize the full scope of what they're gradually aligning themselves with. People who hyper-fixate on the obvious dark side believe they're revealing the impending kingdom of the beast, but in reality, they're actually uncovering the harlot, the very adversary that the beast is destined to destroy as told in Revelation 17:16. That explains why many people, including dominionist proponents of the NAR and seven-mountain mandate, like Lance Wallnau from Bethel Church, often emphasize the idea of "invading Babylon", which he wrote a book about. Because, in essence, what they're building isn't the millennial kingdom of Christ but rather a counterfeit version of it by defeating Babylon and inadvertently ushering in the beast. The world's current turmoil: moral decline, societal upheaval, and the emergence of charismatic leaders promising restoration, isn't new, it's a repeat of history and biblical narratives. This scenario often splits into two camps: those pushing boundaries towards blatant immorality and those advocating for a return to moral and national pride, albeit sometimes through questionable means. Consider Jezebel's story as a metaphor for today's extreme immorality, countered by a force that, while claiming to champion morality, mistakenly aligns with spiritual adversaries in a false unity known as ecumenism. Jehu's story in the Old Testament is a fascinating case of the difference between outward actions and inner spiritual commitment. Externally, Jehu appeared passionate about serving God, notably in his actions against Ahab's family, Jezebel and Baal worship, which might seem like true righteousness. Yet, Jehu's heart wasn't completely devoted to God. His main issue was his selective enthusiasm: he was eager to get rid of God's foes but failed to address the need for his own spiritual purification and that of Israel. Jehu's neglect becomes clear with his acceptance of the golden calf idols in Dan and Bethel. These idols, created by Jeroboam to keep Israelites from worshiping in Jerusalem, were a major departure from genuine worship. Jehu's decision to let these idols stay showed a compromised version of Judaismโ€”one that appeared to respect God on the surface but was fundamentally flawed. The Antichrist reflects a larger, more deceptive version of Jehu's conflict. He will perform actions that look good, like destroying foreign idols and transparently dark agendas, seeming to follow God's will. Yet, his critical failure, akin to Jehu's, will be in what he neglects. He'll ignore the modern-day "golden calves" โ€” subtler forms of idolatry that are not as easy to spot or discern. These may not be as obvious as the overt darkness of Mystery Babylon but are just as offensive to God. This misleading form of Christianity, similar to Jehu's insincere Judaism, will display an outward show of being righteous by targeting external foes while neglecting the deep, inner changes true faith demands, such as the need for sincere repentance and humbling of the heart. It serves as a powerful call for ongoing self-reflection and realignment with God's will, demonstrating that real righteousness involves not just fighting visible wrongs but also facing and rejecting the subtler forms of idolatry that can seep into our lives without us realizing it. This eerily mirrors the Weimar Republic, a period before Nazi Germany, where a struggle between societal depravity and a flawed sense of virtue set the stage for disaster. Jehu's and Jezebel's biblical showdown, where Jehu becomes a vessel of judgment against Jezebel, parallels the rise of figures like Hitler. Hitler, driven by a distorted zeal, identified Judah as the enemy, which history is poised to repeat through unveiling the dark agendas of Mystery Babylon, Jerusalem. Today, we see a cultural war marked by extreme stances on issues like LGBT rights, violence, racism, and especially abortion, which are akin to Jezebel's overt wickedness. The real threat lies not just in the cultural shift towards immorality but in the response it provokesโ€”an ecumenical movement that, though aimed at combating immorality, risks aligning with deceit, setting the stage for the rise of the Antichrist kingdom, a counterfeit kingdom of God as imagined by humanity through defeating Mystery Babylon, which will be misperceived as Satan's ultimate empire. This figure will likely emerge, claiming to oppose these immoral forces, only to lead people into a new and subtler form of idolatry, much like Jehu's false zeal. There's something about standing up against these glaringly obvious social wrongs and oppressive forces that really inflates one's ego. The more time you spend hyper-focused on obvious evils and tyranny the more you'll start to feel not so evil, just like the Pharisee in Luke 18. He convinced himself he was righteous simply because he wasn't as bad as "those other people." Another lesson from history, like King Ahaz's unholy alliance with Assyria, warns us against forming alliances with spiritual enemies for worldly security against physical threats that stem from fearing the world, rather than fearing the Lord. At its heart, the Red Heifer ceremony is more than just a ritual; it's a chapter in the bigger story of faith and prophecy that's been unfolding throughout human history. It's a sign to look inward, to really think about where we stand and what we believe in. It's a pivotal moment that challenges us to choose: Do we follow the path of patience, perseverance, repentance and not following the world's desire for peace and safety as Jesus says, or do we get lost chasing shadows? As we make our way through these stormy times, let's hold tight to the promise of a redemption that goes beyond the chaos surrounding us. Please pray on all of this, my brothers and sisters. May God bless each and every one of you.

Donnie Discerned

715,123 views โ€ข 2 years ago